For God's Sake

Did God Give Madoff Cancer?

Despite denials by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, stories continue to circulate that Bernie Madoff has cancer. Sadly, but not surprisingly, more than a few people have suggested that he is getting what "he deserves" and that this is his "punishment from God". Such comments, and the theologies which support them, while viscerally satisfying for many, actually make God very small. They imagine a God whose frame of reference is no larger than our own, and whose definition of Justice is no more complex.

Of course, if their claim is true and Mr. Madoff is getting his just desserts from God, we would also have to accept that all those people whose lives were turned inside out and upside down by Madoff's thievery were also "getting what they deserved from God". If there is a God who controls the details of our lives at every level of specificity (a possibility I readily accept) and whose actions are immediately understandable and just from a human perspective (a position which I find preposterous), then Madoff's alleged cancer and the suffering that he caused are all ascribable to divine will.

If however, we don't accept the entire package as being from God, we dare not invoke God, or God's justice, as the way to understand Madoff's possible illness. Doing so would just have us using God as the cover for our own desire to wreak vengeance on Mr. Madoff - an entirely understandable, but equally absurd, understanding of God as nothing more than a projection of our own desire for control.

In fact, if we go down this road of too easily ascribing things to God, one could imagine a new defense against the ugliest crimes, including Bernie Madoff's: "If God didn't want it to happen, then God would have stopped me. The devil didn't make me do it, God did! Blame God, not me."

Ultimately, we can choose to ascribe all things to God. But if we do, then we need to let go of the claim that God's logic makes sense to us. Does that mean that we should simply stop invoking divine will as a source for what happens in the universe? Not necessarily. It simply means that we should humbly accept that if divine will is guiding everything, than it is informed by a divine purpose which is so vast and beyond our understanding, that the presence of divine will may provide some of us with genuine comfort, but it excuses nothing in terms of human behavior and explains little more.

God's presence in our lives, whether in our misfortunes or in our triumphs, is a faith worth affirming. But that presence provides no excuse for celebrating the downfall of those we deem our enemies or for pretending that we understand how we came to "earn" the good things in our lives. Divine presence is just that - present with us and a present to us, not an explanation for us.

I don't know if God gave Bernie Madoff cancer. We don't even know if he has cancer. But we should all take note of the fact that how we interpret these events tells us more about ourselves -- our need for vengeance, understanding of justice and the place of compassion in our lives, than it does about either Bernie Madoff or God.

By Brad Hirschfield  |  August 26, 2009; 2:20 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: The Biblical and Rabbinic Roots of Ted Kennedy's Politics | Next: Russia, Poland and Atonement

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



No, god did not give Madoff cancer. To even ask that question marks the speaker as an addlebrained, delusional simpleton living in a fantasy world. Everyone knows that it was the tooth fairy that gave him cancer.

Posted by: Impartialobserver | August 31, 2009 11:15 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Mark says "God will cure us if we deserve it.." and "We are free to pursue our wills on this earth with a guarantee that he will not interfere with our lives."

Speaking for god is easy. Whatever you feel like saying at the moment. No matter if it's contradictory.

Posted by: bobinhouston | August 29, 2009 9:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

HumanSimpleton

For your "open space":

..and if he interfered with all of that, he would be interfering with our free will that he promised us.

We are free to pursue our wills on this earth with a guarantee that he will not interfere with our lives. He will, however, judge us upon what we do while we are here.

What has happened to Jaycee is terrible, and I pray for her recovery.

As for her abductor, he should pay attention to this scripture: “…Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” Matt 25:40.

He will receive his just punishment. In the mean time, we should protect our children from him by confining him to prison for the rest of his life.

Mark
Always seek the truth.


Posted by: volkmare | August 29, 2009 9:44 AM
Report Offensive Comment

No, God was too busy watching Jaycee Lee Duggard raped for 18 years. He had no time to give Madoff cancer, when he was given Jaycee's living nightmares his fullest attention.

But it was God's will that she would be saved. Probably figured out how to pray sincerely.

Just as it was God's will that she be kidnapped, and raped repeatedly till she squeezed out her rapist's children, and then made to live in tents in the backyard.

God watched this.

But Christians can sleep in peace tonight thanking their God for the miraculous return of Jaycee, and his divine patience and attention-span as he watched a eleven year old brutalized by a convicted sex-offender for eighteen years, and his will be done by the birth of two children, one after four years of sexual assaults on a eleven year-old.

Damn, that God sure can watch horror movies with rapt attention. Probably enjoyed it too.

Hallelujah!

[space left below for the apologists to comment on how the rapist will get his due in God's court, how Jaycee will be unraped and things set right in heaven, and how God works in mysterious ways...]

Posted by: HumanSimpleton | August 29, 2009 1:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Concerning the Rabbi's assertion of the possibility that God might have given Madoff cancer, notwithstanding his concession in the last paragraph of the post, in his zeal to attack any presumption of God, Spencer1 wrote:

"...is an excellent example of the immediate and inevitable consequences of the ridiculous assumption that some supreme supernatural being exists."

I'll just say this: Spencer1...ah...never mind.

Posted by: MGT2 | August 28, 2009 6:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Colinnicholas

Heavenly Father (God) is NOT the kind of father that child services were developed for.

He loves us, he does not abuse us.

We are here to prove our worthiness to return to his house, not to be voodoo pincushions to his every whim.

God will cure us if we deserve it, but he will not cause us problems any more than you would your own children. That would be interfering with our free will and making us just rats in a maze to be toyed with.

Heavenly father loves his children (us), he does not cause us harm.

Mark
Always seek the truth.

Posted by: volkmare | August 28, 2009 2:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The only way folks get cancer is if the good lord thinks it's necessary. He's that kinda god. He can give anyone anything...cancer, syphilis, smallpox, aids, heart attacks and strokes. That's why we have to pray to him all the time to stay on god's good side and live a wonderful life, and put lots of money in the collection box. Praise be.

Posted by: colinnicholas | August 28, 2009 12:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hmmm, James210 and Carstonio, the probability waves have returned. Are they crashing these blog beaches in the singularity or are they undulating separately? Ahh, the strangeness of blogging and bloggers!!!!

Posted by: ccnl1 | August 27, 2009 5:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is poetic justice that Madoff now has cancer, however that is not an act of god.

If god were to give someone cancer for the crimes he committed, then there would be no point in the final judgment for he would have already paid for his sins. He would also be interfering with our free will.

However he is watching how we deal with him.

Mark
Always seek the truth.


Posted by: volkmare | August 27, 2009 2:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If God gave Bernie Madoff cancer, why does He also give little kids cancer? They've done nothing to deserve it. I'm a firm believer in karma, but sometimes this really pushes it.

Posted by: Athena4 | August 26, 2009 5:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hirschfield's impossibly tortured and twisted logic re the possibility that god gave Madoff cancer, is an excellent example of the immediate and inevitable consequences of the ridiculous assumption that some supreme supernatural being exists.

Posted by: spencer1 | August 26, 2009 3:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Msh41, one can interpret the Eden story any number of ways. To me, it seems like an allegory for the development of human sentience, including the awareness of mortality and the capacity for moral choice, although the allegory puts very negative spins on both of those developments.

The question is what did the ancient Hebrews intend with the story. Were they telling a make-believe parable to illustrate some aspect of the human experience? Were they telling a history account as they understood or believed it? Or did they have some other meaning in mind?

Posted by: Carstonio | August 26, 2009 11:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment

James10, I like your point, except for the apple part. The idea that the fruit in question was an apple is a modern one. The ancient Hebrews did not have apples, and the word is not in Genesis. It's the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which may still be a poor reason to punish all mankind for all eternity, but at least it has some mythical heft.

"Take for example Adam and Eve and the apple. Prior to the apple episode Adam and Eve were naked and apparently allowed to do whatever came into their minds. God gave them one rule, don't eat the apple. Seems like a rather arbitrary rule. But they eat the apple and for that, all of humanity for all time is stained with original sin. Doesn't seem like justice to me, but then I'm not God either.

Aside: Ironically, we have the expression "An apple a day keeps the doctor away". Wouldn't it be logical to have a dietary law that prohibited apples? Instead they [The Chosen People] came up with a dietary law that you couldn't eat fish without scales. Seems like a slap in the face to God doesn't .... "You told Adam and Eve not to eat apples so we're going to eat one every day."

Maybe that's why the world is so screwed up. God is punishing us for eating apples. Which makes more sense than punishing all of humanity for all time for eating one stinking apple.
"

Posted by: msh41 | August 26, 2009 11:08 AM
Report Offensive Comment

So basically, instead of paying for his own end of life medical treatment, the US taxpayers are going to be footing the bill....I do believe Madoff has gotten the last laugh.

Posted by: wolfcastle | August 26, 2009 9:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment

God gave him SEC. They are the cancer and we all have it.

Posted by: Dermitt | August 26, 2009 9:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"God didn't give Bernie Madoff cancer: Bernie Madoff's evil gave Bernie Madoff cancer."

Even that kind of conclusion is immoral, because it implies that anyone who gets cancer must be a bad person or must have deserved it.

Posted by: Carstonio | August 26, 2009 9:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

God didn't give Bernie Madoff cancer: Bernie Madoff's evil gave Bernie Madoff cancer.

Posted by: joebanks | August 26, 2009 9:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What does Hirschfield mean by "God's presence in our lives"? Is he talking about a sensory perception or an extrasensory perception? Hypothetically, if one had zero knowledge of any religion, how would one determine if one or more gods exist?

Posted by: Carstonio | August 26, 2009 8:40 AM
Report Offensive Comment

God does work in mysterious ways.

Take for example Adam and Eve and the apple. Prior to the apple episode Adam and Eve were naked and apparently allowed to do whatever came into their minds. God gave them one rule, don't eat the apple. Seems like a rather arbitrary rule. But they eat the apple and for that, all of humanity for all time is stained with original sin. Doesn't seem like justice to me, but then I'm not God either.

Aside: Ironically, we have the expression "An apple a day keeps the doctor away". Wouldn't it be logical to have a dietary law that prohibited apples? Instead they [The Chosen People] came up with a dietary law that you couldn't eat fish without scales. Seems like a slap in the face to God doesn't .... "You told Adam and Eve not to eat apples so we're going to eat one every day."

Maybe that's why the world is so screwed up. God is punishing us for eating apples. Which makes more sense than punishing all of humanity for all time for eating one stinking apple.

Posted by: James10 | August 26, 2009 8:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I would go much further than Hirschfield and say that it's morally wrong to believe in divine punishment and reward. If a person believes that Madoff's cancer is justice, the person implicitly believes that if he had the power to give Madoff cancer, he would do so and be justified in doing so.

The gospel song "Farther Along" asks why the "good" suffer and the "wicked" prosper. That song and Hirschfield both make the mistake of assuming that there is some purpose for these unknown to us. We have no evidence for such a purpose, and it's pointless to waste time longing for it. The universe is not a just place. All the evidence and observations we have suggest that the universe is indifferent to human existence and human emotion. We must we must simply accept that and work toward justice toward the limits of our abilities.

Posted by: Carstonio | August 26, 2009 6:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I tend to see it the opposite way, Madoff played the game beautifully. All Ponzi schemes are doomed to fail, at some point you won't find another sucker and the recession probably provided that scenario.

But if he was already ill, why not take chances? why not just push things knowing you'll get exposed sooner? (Thinking that it was the thrill of the chase that spurred him on also.)

All I know is he is always gaming the situation, true or not, he's doing it again.

Posted by: jhtlag1 | August 26, 2009 6:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"...understanding of God as nothing more than a projection of our own desire for control."

During my lifetime, only Gandhi, and now you, made that observation.

Humans are not so difficult to figure out, are we?

Posted by: alltheroadrunnin | August 26, 2009 4:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Religion gives believers mental cancer. Atheists are largely immune.

Posted by: AIPACiswar | August 25, 2009 10:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sure, God gives everyone cancer - what a guy.

Posted by: persiflage | August 25, 2009 10:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I wouldn't waste a CyberKnife on him.
http://www.cyberknife.com/
He could get knifed you know.

Posted by: Dermitt | August 25, 2009 5:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Silly rabbit. God doesn't give people cancer. Madoff gave himself cancer. Bad things happen to good people, too. Do you Huckabees really think God punishes people in this way?

If so, I look forward to God destroying your megachurches in the Bible Belt with tornados and giving Limbaugh kidney disease as a punishment for your collective Abrahamic intolerance.

Posted by: coloradodog | August 25, 2009 5:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gee, is he going to escape punishment the way Ken Lay did?

Posted by: WmarkW | August 25, 2009 2:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company