For God's Sake

Prayer without religion for public schools?

M2X00254_9.JPG
Photo by Katherine Frey/ The Washington Post

Amidst the growing excitement these days about democracy breaking out all over the world, one might be tempted to call for greater respect for "the will of the people" right here at home. New polling by Rasmussen indicates that 65% of Americans favor prayer in our nation's public schools. So why not give the people what they want?

The argument that whatever the majority wants, it should get, is a dangerous and misguided understanding of democracy -- one which quickly leads to an ugly state of affairs in which the rights and dignity of minorities is readily ignored. Tocqueville called this phenomenon "tyranny of the majority", but whatever it is called, it is a real problem when we fail to recall that terms like "will of the people" refer to both a collective people and also to all of the individuals who make up that collective.

While public policy cannot always reflect the desires of the latter, it must at least respect and protect them. Those advocating for the reintroduction of prayer in our public schools need to pause and reflect on how that would be accomplished if prayer were indeed to make such a return. That same poll by Rasmussen holds additional information which suggests one way that might be done.

I am not suggesting that now is the time to bring back prayer to our classrooms, but as one who prays, as one who sees that this issue isn't going away, and as one living in a time when the reintegration of faith and public institutions is on everyone's minds, I am suggesting that we might begin to think about this question in new ways.

Perhaps we should consider thinking about prayer without God, or at least without religion. Apparently that is what millions of us are already doing anyway. Rasmussen's polling indicates that while 65% of Americans want prayer in public schools - higher than last year, a decreasing number of us see religion as playing an important roll in our lives.

In other words, we seem to value prayer more than religion, and that may be a really good thing. In fact, it may be that this seeming preference for prayer over religion indicates a kind of common sense or popular wisdom from which the policy makers and religious leaders who debate the place of prayer in our public schools, could learn a thing or two.

What would it mean to embrace the importance of expressing gratitude and hope, the substance of most prayers in virtually all traditions, without resorting to any specific tradition or prescribed form of expression? What might happen if students were given a moment of silence every day for such reflection? What if we were really daring and called such moments, moments which are already observed in classrooms for all kinds of events, moments of prayer?

A large percentage of Americans seem to have already figured this one out - embracing prayer with increasing enthusiasm while diminishing the role of particular religions. That may well be a threatening trend for some practitioners, but it might also be a way of thinking about an endlessly divisive issue in a way that respects the will of the majority while also respecting and protecting the equally valid and important will of the minority.

By Brad Hirschfield  |  February 16, 2011; 12:26 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: How to handle the "Irvine 11"? Litigate or negotiate? | Next: Middle East troubles herald Messiah's arrival?

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



There cannot be prayer without religion. Praying is a purely religious act. even if it does not explicitly mention god or jesus ot whoever. It is still asking a higher power to act in some way. Those of nor religious following and those whose religions to not beleive in or use prayer would be forced. No one is preventing a religious individual from taking a few moments just about any time of day to pray in line with their belief structure.

Posted by: schnauzer21 | February 24, 2011 9:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

There is a difference between requiring prayer and allowing prayer. And what if the pupils prayed prior to coming to school: to God, Jesus, Ram, Buddha? Is it possible that the founding fathers (of US) had it right: the State should not engage in preferring one religion (or any religion)?

Posted by: Kingofkings1 | February 24, 2011 4:33 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I personally find the very notion of prayer is an absolute inanity. There are only a handful of categories all human communications fall under:
1) Ask or command the other party to do something
2) Inform the other party, hitherto was not aware.
3) Flatter or praise the other party
4) Entertain each other

Now my question is which of these four categories does prayer fall under? I will show that under any of the above categories Prayer is an absurd, consequently it is absurd.

1) Pleading or begging an omniscient god is futile as it knows by its omniscience, everything and what it has decided to bestow upon every one, justly. So ones pleadings or for that matter demands would fall on deaf ears.
2) Again, what is it that one has to inform an omniscient entity that it does not know already.
3) What purpose is served trying to flatter an omniscient entity. It will see through the entire charade fro the get go. Besides flattery is such a petty pursuit, not worthy of any righteous person.
4) This is ridiculous to presume to entertain the supreme deity. On the flip-side, expecting god to entertain oneself is all so selfish an expectation is not worthy of any praise.


So You all theists out there tell me what is the purpose of prayer?

Posted by: Secular | February 23, 2011 9:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

BibleCommentator, not only would that statutory requirement be unconstitutional in the US, it's also deeply offensive to the concept of individual religious conscience. "Giving kids a chance to experience worship and form their own opinions about God" is disingenuous because the exercise is biased in favor of one religion. Faith is a personal matter, not a national or societal matter. The US was founded by people who rightly rejected the commingling of religion and nationalism that you describe. In fact, the state where I live began as a haven for members of a specific Christian sect, one in which membership was considered treasonous in the UK for centuries.

Posted by: Carstonio | February 22, 2011 1:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In the UK kids pray every day. It is a statutory requirement to have a daily act of collective worship in school. All faiths are respected, but acts of worship are to be broadly or mainly Christain in nature. There is an individual right of withdrawl. As a Christian minister, I have led Christian worship in a school that is 90% Moslem, without a problem. The children and parents are happy to learn about other faiths, especially the faith of the country in which they live. I've not seen any riots in the streets about it, here. Only the most millitant athiest groups seem to have a problem with this system. Well, let them use their right of withdrawl.

Its sad that America is taking opportunity away from its children, for whatever reason.

Prayer in schools is not about what the majority want; it's about giving kids a chance to experience worship and form their own opinions about God, the world etc. Maybe in the States worship and prayer should not be compulsory, but at least it should no longer be BANNED!

Posted by: biblecommentator | February 22, 2011 11:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks, CecilG. The people who "seem to go deaf" when told that students can pray on their own in public schools are generally the same ones who become indignant during December when store clerks wish them Happy Holidays. In both cases, they seem to define religious freedom not as individuals worshiping on their own as they choose, but as society and its institutions regarding Christianity as the default or normal religion.

Posted by: Carstonio | February 22, 2011 9:27 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Farnaz2: You and I seem to be on the same page. It is nice to hear from someone who actually agrees with me.

Posted by: cecilg | February 22, 2011 8:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

If we bring back set-aside time for prayer in school, can children for whom prayer involves burning incense pray in school?

What about children for whom prayer is not silent, but chanted? Will they be allowed to pray in school?

Or will only those children for whom silent prayer with no accoutrements is the norm be allowed to pray?

Posted by: lepidopteryx | February 22, 2011 8:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

cecilg:

From the site your reference:


"...the First Amendment forbids religious activity that is sponsored by the government but protects religious activity that is initiated by private individuals" such as students. Therefore, "[a]mong other things, students may read their Bibles or other scriptures, say grace before meals, and pray or study religious materials with fellow students during recess, the lunch hour, or other noninstructional time to the same extent that they may engage in nonreligious activities."

Scanning the threads, I see no suggestion that we burn Bibles should they appear on school property.

Students are free to pray. The institutions are not free to impose prayer or religious instruction on students. There is a vast, vast difference, I'm sure you will agree.

Posted by: Farnaz2Mansouri21 | February 21, 2011 6:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

A friend of mine, let's call him Bob, married a woman who is a devout baptist. Bob's mother and father on the other hand are third-generation seventh day adventists, totally devout.

Bob's mother and his wife are constantly fighting over Bob's soul, his mother convinced his wife is taking him to hell along with all of her family .. why? Because they celebrate the sabbath on different days.

They can't even be in the same room with each other before they start screaming about it.

So sure, let the christians put prayer back in school, they all want it. But how long will it be before they start fighting with each other over prayers that are too catholic, too lutheran, too ... whatever?

Eventually they'll agree, no prayer in school if they have to put up with [catholic or pentacostal or sevent day adventist or whatever] prayers being taught to their children.

You religious types never seem to understand, keeping prayer out of schools wasn't just a way to keep the atheists happy, it's a way to keep you freaking morons from killing each other over the wrong kind of christianity.

Posted by: eezmamata | February 21, 2011 5:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Blending history with a prayer:

The Apostles' Creed 2011: (updated based on the studies of historians during the past 200 years)


I might believe in a god whose existence cannot be proven and said god if he/she/it exists resides in an unproven,human-created, spirit state of bliss called heaven.

I believe there was a 1st century CE, Jewish, simple, preacher-man who was conceived by a Jewish carpenter
named Joseph living in Nazareth and born of a young Jewish girl named Mary. (Some say he was a mamzer.)

Jesus was summarily crucified for being a temple rabble-rouser by the Roman troops in Jerusalem serving under Pontius Pilate,

He was buried in an unmarked grave and still lies a-mouldering in the ground somewhere outside of Jerusalem.

Said Jesus' story was embellished and "mythicized" by many semi-fiction writers. A bodily resurrection and
ascension stories were promulgated to compete with the Caesar myths. Said stories were so popular that they grew into a religion known today as Catholicism/ Christianity and featuring dark-age, daily wine to blood and bread to body rituals
called the eucharistic sacrifice of the non-atoning Jesus.

Amen

Posted by: YEAL9 | February 21, 2011 11:50 AM
Report Offensive Comment

A very good reason to keep prayers OUT of schools is that prayers do not work. To pretend otherwise is ignoring the evidence; many studies have shown this - including one recent study that cost two million dollars and reported in most newspapers including the New York Times.

Besides - history has many examples of attempts to save the lives of Kings or dictators where priests have organized mass prayer groups praying all day and all night to cure maladies and prevent death.
The reason it's not done anymore is that we now know there are no gods to pray to. Praying is simply talking to our fingers. Get real.

Posted by: Rongoklunk | February 21, 2011 11:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Brad: This is a well written and thought provoking piece. It has evoked a number of responses, mostly somewhat negative and some angrily negative. However, three responds that I though were good were from CARSTONI, from FREETHINKER, and from SAJANA'S.

My position oncerning prayer or meditation in the public schools is that we leave things as they are. However, you are absolutely right about one thing, i.e. this issue is not going away. To wit:

I have some relatives and acquaintances who raise their voices stridently and often, proclaiming that prayer has been banned from the public schools. When I tell these fundamentalist types that students are free to pray within a public school, always have been, and probably in this country always will be, these people seem to go deaf.

When I support my claim by pointing out that in 2003 the Sec. of Education prepared and distributed guidelines on constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary and secondary schools, guidelines intended to insure students right to free speech, including prayer -- when I tell these fundamentalists this, they not only go deaf, they often become angry.

The issue is not likely to go away, but for right now, let us leave it alone.

www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/religionandschools/index.html

People, make this a good day.

Posted by: cecilg | February 21, 2011 10:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I suspect this 65% statistic reflects a common misconception. A lot of people seem to think that students are not allowed to pray in schools, which isn't true. Schools and school officials can't lead prayer, but students can pray at appropriate times. I bet a large number of those 65% just want kids to be able to pray in school, which they can.

Posted by: acebojangles | February 21, 2011 10:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Header:"New polling by Rasmussen indicates that 65% of Americans favor prayer in our nation's public schools. So why not give the people what they want?"

For the same reason the people of Alabama can't have segregated schools, like their constitution mandates. It violates the rights of the individual as protected by the federal constitution.

Posted by: WmarkW | February 21, 2011 9:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Prayer without hard work is nothing more than a WISH. Teaching children to depend on wishes is ignorant. As a Buddhist, I wish the schools would allow children to form a Buddhist prayer. In Buddhism, you must answer your own prayers through hard work alone.

Making a prayer to some external deity just teaches about failure, not success. Praying to yourself to develop and answer your own prayers teaches success in life and faith, and laves nothing for others to do for you, just do for yourself.

I notice Christian's, Catholics, and Jewish, demand I pray with them, but they have NEVER offered to pray with me, with my prayers.

SELFISH GROUP CHRISTIANS are by their actions against others.

I taught my children to be aware of those that are selfish and care only for themselves and care nothing for others. I put my Children through Catholic school and told the priests and nuns, I would take care of their faith, while the school should focus on education alone. They agreed, as I paid the bills. I put them their because they were beat up and bullied in public schools.

Posted by: patmatthews | February 21, 2011 8:57 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Perhaps prayer can help the world.

May the most Sacred Heart of Jesus be praised, honored, adored, glorified, loved and preserved throughtout the world now and forever. Amen Sacred Heart of Jesus, pray for us. St Judes, worker of miracles, pray for us. St. Jude help of the hopeless, pray for us. Repeat 9 times a day for nine days and publish and your request will be granted. MCK

Posted by: Camille7 | February 21, 2011 8:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hmmm.. 65% of people favor prayer in public schools, but a decreased number say religion is playing an important roll in our lives. The conclusion is that here is something wrong with the polling in that 65% number.

Perhaps "favor" actually means "wouldn't strongly object to".

Posted by: DrRP1 | February 21, 2011 8:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

A moment of silence will not work for all the many reasons put forward in numerous venues.

The Constitution is there for a reason. We tend too frequently to honor it in the breach, already. Enough, frankly, is enough.

The more serious problems concern removing the RCC from the Congress, along with the Evangelicals.

Next, prohibit lobbying by organized religion.

Finally, end nonprofit status for all religious institutions.

Pray as you will, where you will, but not in violation of the Establishment Clause.
-------------------
Rabbi, on another note, consider this. For you and for other observant Jews, how, possibly, could accommodations be established that would honor daily prayer requirements?

And what of certain other groups?

Etc.
--------------
Sometimes, compromise is really a kind of surrender.

Posted by: Farnaz2Mansouri21 | February 20, 2011 2:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Having public, mandated prayer in schools, no matter what slant you put on it, is oppression. Students, as they are now, are perfectly free to pray when and where they wish, as long as they aren't disruptive. Why is there a need to take this and impose it on everyone else? Why are people such busy bodies that it matters to them not just that they pray, but that everyone else *must* pray.

And do you really think for a moment that mandating a moment of prayer, however non-religious it might seem if you excise mention of God, or Gods, or Satan, or whatever, is not license for the teacher or principal to impose their own religious views?

There is no good that comes out of enforcing some spiritual idea on children. Frankly, I don't think even parents have that right. Let the kids decide for themselves. You cannot enforce religion, and forcing any sort of thing just results in people's rights being violated.

Posted by: Sajanas | February 18, 2011 4:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Posted by: ITs-TIME | February 18, 2011 4:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Perhaps we should consider thinking about prayer without God, or at least without religion."

There's no such thing. All prayer is inherently sectarian. Even a prayer that mentions "God" only endorses monotheism at the expense of polytheism and animism and other types of religion.

To be clear, "prayer in school" means teachers or administrators leading mandatory prayer, and when they do so they endorse some religions over others. That's why it's unconstitutional. "Prayer in school" does not mean students praying on their own, something they have the right to do.

There's nothing wrong in principle with Hirschfield's idea of a moment of silence. In practice, however, there would have to be strict guidelines on its implementation. Otherwise, some school officials and board members may hijack the idea to push their religious beliefs on students.

Posted by: Carstonio | February 18, 2011 3:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The Rasmussen Poll? Really, Rabbi?

Who are you going to quote next? Fox News?

Posted by: areyousaying | February 18, 2011 2:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Students are already free to "express gratitude and hope" to whomever they imagine is listening. Many do.

Faculty and staff, government employees, may not organize or lead these exercises. Let's leave things this way, Brad.

Posted by: FreetoThink | February 18, 2011 12:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is not prayer just a waste of time?

The subject of prayer relates directly to the subject of religions and their foundations.

And what has history, scriptural text reviews and archeology taught us about these foundations?

1. Abraham is the reported founder of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Based on all we know now, Abraham was at best a combination of three separate individuals with 1.5 million Conservative Jews no longer believing he existed at all. (ditto for Moses and Noah)references: National Georgraphic review on Abraham, David and http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20E1EFE35540C7A8CDDAA0894DA404482

2. The founders of Christianity and Islam were both illiterate. i.e. neither one proof read or approved the NT or the koran so we are taking the word of scribes and embellishers with their own agendas?

references: NT exegetes from the last two hundred years, earlychristianwritings.com/theories.html

3. Christianity is based on the whim of Pilate, the false prophecy of the imminent second coming, and the sword of Constantine.

references: NT exegetes and their conclusions/books from the last two hundred years

Conclusion: Jewish, Christian and Islamic prayers have very little foundation to rely on.

Posted by: YEAL9 | February 18, 2011 11:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Let's just let people pray separately with their own and respect the First Amendment.

Evangelical Christians apparently don't have the corner on theocon designs for America.

Posted by: areyousaying | February 18, 2011 8:19 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Anyone who wants to pray can pray on their own time. Religion is controversial and divisive and should be kept out of public schools. Lets continue to keep religion and state separate.

Posted by: drwycw | February 17, 2011 10:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a disgusting idea. It's in your interest to get schools to indoctrinate children into believing in a supernatural God - it keeps you employed.

Be religious if it must - but keep it out of schools. It is the oldest scam of them all, and the greatest of lies.

Posted by: Rongoklunk | February 17, 2011 8:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In the U.S.A. as we know that everyone has a right to beleive in what ever religion they want just so they DO NOT force it on another by any means. KEEP ALL RELIGIONS OUT OF ALL U.S.A. PUBLIC SCHOOLS. If you want a religion in school, then go to a PRIVATE SCHOOL.

Posted by: usapdx | February 17, 2011 8:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

LET them do that (Pray in Public in Unison) in "CHURCH's, aka Temples, Synagogues, Mosques etc.. NOt on STATE

PATRIOTISM is Never RELIGIONISM.

America, Needs LESS , Not MORE REligions , includes Places of Church Worships. No Abusive, Tax-Free, Rides Anymore.

VOTE: Stop the [Funding] Building of Synagogues, Churches, Mosques etc.!

Help REDUCE AMERICA's DEFICIT!
Note: SECULARanity is a RELIGION Here, maybe Not Israel et al! Aye Boychick?

Posted by: IN_IT_WE_TRUST | February 17, 2011 7:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Amidst all the celebrating about the prospect for democracy in Egypt, there lies the very real possibility that they will use the ballot to vote themselves back to the Dark Ages. About 80% of Egyptian women are genitally mutilated, which is about the same fraction of the Egyptian people who favor things like stoning for adultery and death for apostasy.

Favoring prayer in school without endorsing any view, is a mis-guided attempt to deal with a very real problem -- cultural and political extremism. A society in which one side talks about "honoring the Constitution" and "following the prinicples of our founding fathers" while the other uses terms like "glass ceilings," "white privilege," "nativism," and "Islamophobia" is talking past each other.

People are fed up with a political process that consists primarily of pointing out how much worse the other side is. A choice between a party that takes money from the middle class to give to the idle rich, and one that gives it to the idle poor, is not satisfying to the majority of Americans.

Posted by: WmarkW | February 17, 2011 2:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Post a Comment




characters remaining

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company