Video
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Catholics and Unions
When I was growing up, it was almost part of the catechism that Catholics backed labor unions. We were taught that papal encyclicals on social and economic justice put us on the side of legitimate demands from workers. That centuries-old support received new clarity in June of 2009 when Catholic health workers and the U.S. Bishops delivered "Respecting the Just Rights of Workers."
In the spirit of the papal social encyclicals, this new document puts the American Church in support of union rights for the 21st century, which logically includes teachers in Catholic schools. The release of the bishops' document follows on the heels of the unionization of Catholic workers in Boston where employees of Caritas Christi joined the SEIU en masse. Now that the federal government is controlled by Democrats in the White House and in both houses of the Congress, it is fair to ask what unionization means to Catholic America.
The withering of Catholic support for unions became significant during the 1970s when the erosion of religious vocations ripped away a major part of the labor force in Catholic schools and in Catholic hospitals. Lay workers were hired to take their places. Secular salaries drove up the cost for Catholic schools and hospitals, forcing significant numbers of institutions into insolvency. In defense of their interests to adequate pay and benefits, many lay workers within church-run institutions demanded labor unions. But these increased demands for unionization came at a political moment dominated by union-busting presidents like Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.
The political climate conditioned the response from individual bishops. Among those who resisted unionization, the policies went from NIMBY ("not in my back yard") to downright hostility in declaring that unionization would "mean the end of Catholic education in the diocese."
Now the underpinning of that anti-union stance has been blown away. Cardinal McCarrick, the retired Archbishop of Washington and a leading player in the writing of the bishops' new document, said: "Because Catholic health care is a ministry, not an industry, how it treats its workers and how organized labor treats Catholic health care are not simply internal matters. They are also not just another arena for labor conflict and tactics, but ought to reflect longstanding Catholic teaching on work and workers, health care and the common good."
In other words, the church's relationship to its employees is not calculated merely as a bottom-line entry in a ledger, but part of the Church's mission to make God's Kingdom come.
Viewing union support through that pastoral and Catholic meaning makes it hugely different from the sort of blind ideological pandering that might be generated by a political machine. The Church supports good unions, not just any union. At the core of the consistent papal teaching is the end to destructive enmity between workers and owners.
In this new document, Catholic hospitals bind themselves to respond to a higher authority and become a model for all employers while simultaneously affording workers participation in management decisions. Greater power to management participation by unions is also at the heart of the restructuring of the American auto industry, wherein unions hold significant shares of ownership at Chrysler and General Motors. This trend is in accord with papal teaching.
What needs to be added here is how closely the bishops' document adheres to the provisions in the still-to-be-passed bill for worker's free choice of a union. Even without being forced to do so by legislation, the bishops have adopted a measure that puts them squarely in the pro-union column when it comes to hospitals and health care. The forthcoming encyclical of Pope Benedict XVI is reported to reiterate these premises, updating the church's stance on issues that have arisen with globalization. Moreover, it is likely to be a topic in the pope's meeting with President Obama in Rome on July 10th.
After many years as a scholar of Catholicism, I have come to realize that we Catholics often contradict our image as a monolithic religion and often are pulled in opposite directions by competing statements from pope, bishops and clergy. At least now we know that the pro-union direction is the Catholic choice, not NIMBY.
By Anthony M. Stevens-Arroyo |
June 30, 2009; 10:54 AM ET
| Category:
Catholic America
Save & Share:
Previous: Abortion and Slavery |
Next: The Pope and Peoria
Posted by: TomfromNJ1 | July 7, 2009 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Catholic priests, brothers and nuns need to unionize so they can strike for better pay, marriage privileges and equality in leadership roles
Posted by: ccnl1 | July 4, 2009 2:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Dear Rev. Stephens-Arroyo,
Do you intend to address the Inquisition launched by the Vatican against American nuns? The New York Times publicized the campaign on July 2.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/02/us/02nuns.html?_r=1&em
Excerpts:
"The Vatican is quietly conducting two sweeping investigations of American nuns, a development that has startled and dismayed nuns who fear they are the targets of a doctrinal inquisition... many (nuns)fear that the real motivation is to reel in American nuns who have reinterpreted their calling for the modern world...'Some sisters surmise that the Vatican and even some American bishops are trying to shift them back into living in convents, wearing habits or at least identifiable religious garb, ordering their schedules around daily prayers and working primarily in Roman Catholic institutions, like schools and hospitals...'They think of us as an ecclesiastical work force,' said Sister Sandra M. Schneiders, professor emerita of New Testament and spirituality at the Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley, in California...'our vision of our lives, and their vision of us as a work force, are just not on the same planet.' "
Look forward to your assessment.
Posted by: tbarksdl | July 3, 2009 8:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment
JUST LIKE BUSSINESS MUST BE ORGANIZED, SO MUST LABOR TO MAKE A JUST WAGE AND PROTECTION. LOOK AT THE USA ECONMICS FROM THE EARLY 1950s TO THE MOVE OF OUT SOURCEING. THE NON UNION WAGE EARNER MAKES A POOR WAGE WITH NO PROTECTION OTHER THAN CIVIL LAW. THE STANDARD OF LIVING HAS DROPED IN THE USA ACCOUNT OF THIS. WITH THE REPULICAN PARTY WHICH LOOKS AFTER MORE THE EMPLOYEER, WHY ARE SO MANY RELIGIOUS MEMBERS OF THE REPULICAN PARTY? WHAT IS A JUST WAGE AND A JUST PROFIT? IF THE USA WHOULD CHANGE THE TAX LAWS, OUT SOURCEING WHOULD NOT BE SO PROFITABLE. IF CONGRESS WHOULD COME DOWN ON THE ILLEGAL'S EMPLOYERS WHICH ARE BREAKING THE LAW, THE LOWER END'S WAGES AND JOBS WHOULD PICK UP AND THE PLUS 12 MILLION ILLEGALS WHOULD LEAVE THE USA ON THEIR OWN. THOES THAT FILE TAX EXAMPT AND SPEAK OUT ON POLITICS MUST BE APPROCHED BY THE I.R.S.FOR VIOLATING THE TAX EXAMPT RULES. BEAR IN MIND THE TENTH COMMANDMENT NOT TO MENTION A FEW OTHERS WITH IT'S VIOLATION.
Posted by: usapdx | June 30, 2009 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.
Back in the days when the Church was supporting the unions and a spokesman for the poor, the Church thrived. Many of the children of these people became the priests, brothers, and sisters. But then the Church started moving out to the suburbs and abandoning the poor in the cities. While most religious stayed liberal, some pastors interested in fund raising may have sold their souls on this matter. And, of course, the Church has suffered. Children who are brought up in a house where greed reigns and where the attitude is I've got mine and I will do everything possible to keep it from you are not likely to follow a calling to the poverty of a religious order but, it turns out also not to the diocesan priesthood which, while not having that vow still requires sacrifices.
As someone far wiser than I am said, you reap what you sow.