The Faith Divide

The Power of Protest

Today's guest blogger is Hafsa Arain, an intern at the Interfaith Youth Core. Born in Karachi, Pakistan and raised in the suburbs of Chicago, Illinois, she is a senior at DePaul University, where she works with University Ministry as a Student Interfaith Scholar, and is on the board of the Muslim Students' Association, UMMA.

I find it really interesting that Thomas Friedman, like other scholars and thinkers, needs Muslims (or in this case, Pakistanis) to actively demonstrate against terrorism, extremism, fundamentalism, whatever you want to call it. I completely understand why this is a popular idea, but I have a few problems with it.

Large populations of Muslims, as well as other groups of people around the world, have a lot of civil rights issues that need to be dealt with. Their problems consist of poverty, starvation, disease, government oppression, sometimes violent living conditions, and more. This is true for, sadly, a large population of the world; it is not limited to Muslims. So instead of asking why Muslims don't stand up against extremism, I think our question should be why people feel the need to resort to violence in the first place.

Yes, fundamentalists are, in many ways, irrational. How, then, do they have such clout in their areas? Because they promise things that protesting cannot: results. Whether or not they receive the food, clothing, and shelter that were promised, the fact that someone gave them their word is powerfully enticing.

In many cases, protests have not worked for the rest of the world. Here in the United States, we are unbelievably fortunate to have the power of protest with us, and the right to actively demonstrate whenever we feel the need or reason. However, when Sikh groups in Punjab, India protested for more governmental representation, they were ignored. When a few of them turned to violence, suddenly their government was paying attention, but with negative attention.

Protest only works if people can believe in their own power of change. I know many Pakistani people have lost that belief. Their mistrust in the Pakistani government is high, and that is not going to be rectified soon. This is why you don't see Pakistanis protesting their own government, but rather Denmark's. Because in Denmark, they might have a say.

The content of this blog reflects the views of its author and does not necessarily reflect the views of either Eboo Patel or the Interfaith Youth Core.

By Eboo Patel  |  December 15, 2008; 12:37 PM ET  | Category:  Personal Religion , Religion & Leadership , Religion & Politics , Religious Conflict Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: In Defense of Sonal Shah | Next: The Day After Mumbai: Nothing Changed

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Pakistan has been ruled by military dictators for most of its 60 year history. Maybe Pakistanis don't even know what democracy is really about. Getting educated in madrassas don't help much in understanding secular democracy. A non-Muslim opinion is non-existent in Pakistan. Muslims themselves seem poorly equipped to criticize their own government. Hence military dictatorships have been the order of the day and most likely civil governments can ultimately function only as puppets to the military. Pakistanis must learn the art of looking inside for their own problems without constantly looking for scapegoats. Poverty does not automatically lead to terrorism. Terrorism, just like resorting to a life of crime to deal with poverty, is a choice.

Not trying to take over Indian territory (read: Kashmir) in the name of "liberating" Muslims would help too. Over 140 million Muslims live in India of their own free will, even though some Hindu fascists would dearly like them to move to Pakistan or Bangladesh created specially for the purpose of accommodating Indian Muslims who didn't want to live with non-Muslims in India. The real reason for taking over Kashmir is no secret. It is a beautiful part of India, and the intention is to make money through tourism. Calling it religious liberation is a complete lie. With all the problems all of the poor of all religions in India faces, Indian Muslims are not doing any worse. They would all move to Pakistan if it were not so. There are successful and rich Muslims in every strata of Indian society.

Posted by: politicallyincorrectworldcitizen1 | December 15, 2008 5:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company