Georgetown/On Faith

A world of despair

This Catholic's View

By Thomas J. Reese, S.J.

As I was thinking about this column, there was a part of me that knew I had to write about Haiti and there was another part that simply wanted to ignore it.

On the one hand, we are faced with a humanitarian disaster in Porte-au-Prince that cannot be ignored. An estimated 200,000 people have died. Thousands have been traumatically injured, and many of them will die of their injuries or disease. These people are not just statistics, they are men and women and children with faces and names and feelings. Those who survive will be living in a ruined country without hospitals, utilities or housing. Finding water and food is a daily struggle. Haiti was a basket case before the earthquake and now there is not even a basket.

On the other hand, I want to ignore Haiti. I am suffering from what has been called compassion fatigue. Or maybe it is simply despair. The economy of the world is in the toilet. Unemployment in the U.S. will stay around 10 percent for the rest of the year. Wars are going on in Iraq, Afghanistan and all over Africa. There are millions of refugees around the world. Because of global warming, humanity is heading pell-mell toward an ecological cataclysm that will make the Haitian disaster pale to insignificance. And partisan politics has created gridlock in Washington making it impossible to deal with any of these crises.

As a political scientist, journalist and priest, I have followed and commented on the tragedies of the world for the past 30 years, and I am tired and ready to despair. Living in a global village sucks. The problems are too big and we appear powerless to do anything about them. St. John of the Cross would call this the "Dark Night of the Soul." I think it is what Jesus experienced in the agony of the Garden.

How do we get out of this dark night, how do we get out of this despair?

The Scriptures help by showing us the compassion of God. When confronted with the suffering of the refugees returning to a destroyed Jerusalem after the Babylonian captivity, God said through Isaiah, "For Zion's sake I will not be silent, for Jerusalem's sake I will not be quiet."

Updating that for today would be: "For Haiti's sake I will not be silent, for Porte-au-Prince's sake I will not be quiet." God is not indifferent to human disaster. He cries out with the suffering of his people. If God cries out, how can we be silent?

God promises that they will be vindicated. "No more will men call you 'Forsaken,' or your land 'Desolate,' but you shall be called 'My Delight,' and your land 'Espoused.'" This is what God wants for Haiti. Ministers who talk about God punishing Haiti are blasphemous.

In the Gospels, Jesus also shows the compassionate face of God to the sick, the disenfranchised, the outcasts. He wept over Jerusalem and now he weeps over Porte-au-Prince. If Christians are truly the body of Christ, then we too must weep over Jerusalem and Porte-au-Prince. The people of Haiti know that God has not abandoned them, he weeps with them.

There is a story that I am sure many of you have heard before which also gives me hope. It is about a man walking down a beach after a storm has cast millions of starfish high up on the shore where they are dying because they cannot get back to the water. He sees a little girl picking up starfish, one at a time, and carrying them back to the sea. He asks her why she bothers since she will not be able to make any difference when there are so many. And as she drops a starfish in the sea, she responds, "Well, I made a difference for that one."

This story reminds us to do what we can. You can make a difference with the people you touch even if you cannot save everyone. You try and do the best you can. This story also reminds us old guys that there are children out there who care, young people with energy and compassion who will make a difference. This new generation also gives me hope.

Two organizations making a difference in Haiti are Catholic Relief Service (CRS) and Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS). They were in Haiti before the disaster and they will be there after the cameras go home.

Thomas J. Reese, S.J., is a Senior Fellow, Woodstock Theological Center, Georgetown University.

By Thomas J. Reese |  January 25, 2010; 12:02 PM ET

 | Category:  This Catholic's View Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Environmentalists as missionaries | Next: The activist Buddhist

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



"I'm confused, what about Occam's razor would force one to deduce that the existence of God is very unlikely?"

Yes, you are.

Occam's razor cannot force one to deduce anything.

Posted by: PSolus | February 5, 2010 4:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm confused, what about Occam's razor would force one to deduce that the existence of God is very unlikely?

Posted by: arasin89 | February 5, 2010 10:40 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"You wrote, "It's not all about you, regardless of who you may believe you have met; this article was written by a Thomas J. Reese.""

You're getting pretty good at this.

"My comment was to alltheroadrunnin about a comment that he/she made to me, not specifically about what Thomas J. Reese wrote."

I presumed that he/she would have referred to you as "friend of god".

"If you have actually ever read anything that I have written on these different sites, you would or should know that I have never said nor implied that it was "all about me"."

Now, now, don't your panties in a bunch.

"Quite the contrary, I have said that it is about God and God's Plan for All of humanity and All of creation of which I happen to be a member of."

That's your BFF god, right?

"I have said tho that God chose me for a specific "job" and that it is up to God to see me thru on the "job" that God chose for me to do, I did not chose this "job", God did, I accepted."

Correction, that's your boss-man god, right?

"Like it says, "Remember, you have not chosen Me, I have chosen you", God chose, I accepted, pretty simple."

You must be as giddy as a schoolgirl.

"See you and the rest of humanity in the Kingdom."

You won't be seeing me.

"Take care, be ready."

Don't worry, be happy.

"Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum."

Insincerely, Peregrine Bartleby Rumpelstiltskin Solus

Posted by: PSolus | February 4, 2010 11:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

PSolus

You wrote, "It's not all about you, regardless of who you may believe you have met; this article was written by a Thomas J. Reese."

My comment was to alltheroadrunnin about a comment that he/she made to me, not specifically about what Thomas J. Reese wrote.

If you have actually ever read anything that I have written on these different sites, you would or should know that I have never said nor implied that it was "all about me".

Quite the contrary, I have said that it is about God and God's Plan for All of humanity and All of creation of which I happen to be a member of.

I have said tho that God chose me for a specific "job" and that it is up to God to see me thru on the "job" that God chose for me to do, I did not chose this "job", God did, I accepted.

Like it says, "Remember, you have not chosen Me, I have chosen you", God chose, I accepted, pretty simple.

See you and the rest of humanity in the Kingdom.

Take care, be ready.

Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum.

Posted by: ThomasBaum | February 2, 2010 11:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"You wrote, "Rather than reading the Scriptures, Thomas, you could have read Arthur Schopenhauer. He had more information, than the writers of the Scriptures. Then, your other choice would be just as reasonable."

I have never heard of Arthur Schopenhauer much less read anything that he wrote."

It's not all about you, regardless of who you may believe you have met; this article was written by a Thomas J. Reese.

Posted by: PSolus | February 1, 2010 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

alltheroadrunnin

You wrote, "Rather than reading the Scriptures, Thomas, you could have read Arthur Schopenhauer. He had more information, than the writers of the Scriptures. Then, your other choice would be just as reasonable."

I have never heard of Arthur Schopenhauer much less read anything that he wrote.

What do you mean by "other choice"?

Take care, be ready.

Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum.

Posted by: ThomasBaum | February 1, 2010 3:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Large scale disasters inevitably raise discussions about our hope and faith in God, and God’s actions in the world, but perhaps we should also ask about God’s hope and faith in us. Why did it take an earthquake to arouse a level of global compassion that Haitians have never before experienced? The concentrated and conspicuous suffering in the wake of this 2010 earthquake has elements of the chronic daily suffering that Haitians have tried to escape for decades. The crumbling infrastructures, the poverty, the predation by gangs, have been blights on that nation for far too long. The outrageous burdens of an unfair national debt with roots in reparations to slave holders has too long weighed down the hopes of Haiti. Now in the midst of tragic deaths, injuries, fears, and despair, we might ask ourselves where were the prophylactic actions of the global community to seek justice that would have allowed the nation to outfit itself with structures that could withstand seismic activity to a greater degree. Is justice as simple as access to sufficient rebar ? Is justice as simple as the possibility of modern building codes and standards ? Is justice as simple as acknowledging and righting historic wrongs ? How much less compassion fatigue we’d feel now, had a clarion call for social and economic justice in and for Haiti captivated the entire world long before now.

Posted by: MarshaHansen | January 31, 2010 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Rather than reading the Scriptures, Thomas, you could have read Arthur Schopenhauer. He had more information, than the writers of the Scriptures. Then, your other choice would be just as reasonable.

Posted by: alltheroadrunnin | January 31, 2010 3:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"I wrote, ""No matter how "unlikely", God does indeed "exist", I have met God."""

Indeed you did.

"You responded, "This is not true; it is simply something that you desperately want to believe is true.""

Yep, that sounds like something that I would write.

"Not really, actually it was 10 years and 2 days ago that I met, Who is referred to as God the Father and 10 years and 1 day ago that I met the Holy Spirit Who revealed to me that the Catholic Eucharist Is Jesus."

Again, this is not true; this is simply something that you desperately want to believe is true.

"It was then that I stopped believing in God and KNEW that God Is and Is a Trinity."

I'm sure that you desperately want to believe this to be true.

"There are still things that I believe and there are a few things that I know."

I'm sure that there are many things that you want to believe to be true, and that you have convinced yourself that are true.

"Also, it was 10 years ago today that I met satan."

Again, I'm sure that you desperately want to believe that that is true.

It seems as if it is you who "desperately" wants to believe that there is no God..."

Wrong: I believe nothing.

"...but not only are you wrong but it seems as if your "conception" of God is also wrong..."

Wrong: I have no conception of an imaginary being.

"...as does it seem that quite a few people that believe that God Is also have a distorted "conception" of God."

And I’m sure that they desperately want to believe that.

"If God were even remotely like some people's "conception" of God than I, personally, would want to have nothing to do with God and would wish that there was not a God."

Well, good for you.

"God has a Plan and not only is it for All of humanity but it is also for All of creation."

I’m sure that you desperately want to believe that; how do you think that plan is going so far?

"Take care, be ready."

Don’t' worry, be happy.

"Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum."

Peregrine Bartleby Rumpelstiltskin Solus

Posted by: PSolus | January 30, 2010 2:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

PSolus

I wrote, ""No matter how "unlikely", God does indeed "exist", I have met God.""

You responded, "This is not true; it is simply something that you desperately want to believe is true."

Not really, actually it was 10 years and 2 days ago that I met, Who is referred to as God the Father and 10 years and 1 day ago that I met the Holy Spirit Who revealed to me that the Catholic Eucharist Is Jesus.

It was then that I stopped believing in God and KNEW that God Is and Is a Trinity.

There are still things that I believe and there are a few things that I know.

Also, it was 10 years ago today that I met satan.

It seems as if it is you who "desperately" wants to believe that there is no God but not only are you wrong but it seems as if your "conception" of God is also wrong as does it seem that quite a few people that believe that God Is also have a distorted "conception" of God.

If God were even remotely like some people's "conception" of God than I, personally, would want to have nothing to do with God and would wish that there was not a God.

God has a Plan and not only is it for All of humanity but it is also for All of creation.

Take care, be ready.

Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum.

Posted by: ThomasBaum | January 30, 2010 9:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"No matter how "unlikely", God does indeed "exist", I have met God."

This is not true; it is simply something that you desperately want to believe is true.

"If it weren't for God, we would not exist."

This, also, is not true; it is simply something that you desperately want to believe is true.

"Take care, be ready."

Don't worry, be happy.

"Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum."

Insincerely, Peregrine Bartleby Rumpelstiltskin Solus

Posted by: PSolus | January 29, 2010 10:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There's a good reason for life being so tough. Human tragedy offers the opportunity of revealing a soul's core character. In difficult conditions, such as in Haiti, while some become more hardened, others become more humble. It becomes easy to tell who loves God and men, and who does not.

God comfort those who suffer and strengthen those who respond to their needs.

http://bwldrnss.blogspot.com/2010/01/trial-life.html

Posted by: mwpalmer | January 29, 2010 6:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

tojby_2000

You wrote, "If you would simply apply the elegantly simple logic of Occam's Razor to the god question, sir, perhaps you would deduce that one is very unlikely to exist."

No matter how "unlikely", God does indeed "exist", I have met God.

If it weren't for God, we would not exist.

Take care, be ready.

Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum.

Posted by: ThomasBaum | January 29, 2010 1:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If you would simply apply the elegantly simple logic of Occam's Razor to the god question, sir, perhaps you would deduce that one is very unlikely to exist.
Please reconsider your fundamental assumption, father.

Posted by: tojby_2000 | January 29, 2010 12:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

'And as she drops a starfish in the sea, she responds, "Well, I made a difference for that one."'

"Whoever saves one life, saves the whole world."

Posted by: norriehoyt | January 29, 2010 11:58 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You can learn more about the work of Jesuit Refugee Service in Haiti here
http://www.jrsusa.org/haiti/

Posted by: Tampa | January 27, 2010 2:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

ALL NATIONS HAVE BORDERS AND A TOTAL RIGHT TO THEIR OWN GOVERMENT AND LAWS. NO OTHER NATION OR RELIGION THAT FROM ANOTHER STATE ( nation ) HAS NO RIGHT TO TELL ANOTHER NATION OF HOW TO RUN ANOTHER NATION. A GROUP OF NATIONS CAN CALL FOR CHANGE IN A NATION ONLY THROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS. IT TIME THAT G20 REQUIRES ALL THAT TRADE WITH G20 MUST USE A FLOATING CURRANCY FOR THE GIVEN TRADE ACCOUNT PEGGED CURRANCIES ARE UNJUST. THOES IN THE USA THAT PAY NO TAX AS A GROUP UNDER THE TAX EXAMPT LAW MUST NOT SPEAK ON ANY POLITICAL MATTERS AS REQUIRE BY THE TAX EXAMPT LAW ACCOUNT TOTAL FREE SPEECH IN THE USA REQUIRES NOT ONLY TO FILE TAX OF THE INCOME BUT TO PAY THE TAX DUE. THE USA BALANCE SHEET MUST BE CORRECTED OR THE USA WILL GO TO A INSOLVENT NATION. ALL NATIONS OF THE WORLD WHOULD MAKE THE WORLD BETTER BY LIVING WITHIN THEIR ECONMIC AS WELL AS RESPECT THE BORDERS OF ALL OTHER NATIONS BEARING IN MIND THE ENVIORMENT OF THE PLANET. PEOPLE OF THE WORLD THAT WILL BECOME PARENTS MUST FULLY BEAR IN MIND THAT THEY ARE FULLY RESPONSABLE TO RAISE THAT CHILD TO ADULTHOOD NOT TO DEPEND ON OTHERS OTHER THAN WHAT THEIR NATION OFFERS. WHAT RIGHT DOES ONE HAVE TO VIOLATE A LAW OF ANY GIVEN NATION?

Posted by: usapdx | January 27, 2010 11:43 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Each and every god exists only the minds of the people who believe in that god.

Posted by: PSolus | January 26, 2010 5:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company