God in Government

Cheney's Support for Gay Marriage

By Jacqueline L. Salmon

It's not often (OK, maybe never) that you find Dick Cheney to the left of Barack Obama on any issue, but here's one. Former vice president Cheney yesterday voiced his support for gay marriage, as long as it is handled by the states and not the federal government.

Cheney, whose daughter has a longtime lesbian partner, said at the National Press Club that "people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish, any kind of arrangement they wish."

As my colleague Dan Eggan notes in his story:
"Cheney's position appears also to put him to the left of the current president on the issue. President Obama has said he supports civil unions, rather than marriage, for gay men and lesbians."

The question is whether Cheney's support will make any difference in the gay-marriage debate. Will it pull over more Christian conservatives into the pro-gay marriage camp? Probably not.

UPDATE: The Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights group, welcomed Cheney's comments, but it was through gritted teeth. "It is unfortunate that it took the former vice president two terms in office, two terms that were the most anti-LGBT in history, before he decided to stand up for equality," said Joe Solmonese, President of the Human Rights Campaign. "That being said, we welcome his voice to the table on this issue and hope the remaining right-wing opponents of marriage equality see how completely out of touch they have become."

By Jacqueline L. Salmon  |  June 2, 2009; 1:48 PM ET  | Category:  God in Government Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Religious Group Sets Up AskJudgeSotomayor.com | Next: Competing Groups of D.C. Ministers Struggle Over Gay Marriage

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Dick Cheney doesn't get points for defending his daughter's right to create a secure and committed family life of her own. That's part of being a dad, loving and supporting your kids and wanting what's best for them. This doesn't make him liberal, nor does it place him to the left of Barack Obama, by any means. To suggest so is nothing but malarkey. It simply reveals his humanity, proving his most avid critics were wrong – he's not Darth Vader after all.

But he's no Jimmy Stewart, either. His tolerance comes a day late and a dollar short, and only serves to demonstrate the lack of sincerity with which politicians are willing to kowtow to the vanities, fears, and prejudices of voters for the sake of wealth and power.

Let's face it, today's Republicans wouldn't have a house of freaks to call a party without the likes of philistines and nativists, racist rednecks and gun enthusiasts, and self-exalted religious fundamentalists. The Bush-Cheney administration had no qualms about appealing to the collective insipidity of this constituency of dupes. For eight years the Vice President was willing to not defend the dignity of his own daughter's domestic partnership in order to feign solidarity with the banality and stone-age religiosity that have pervaded American social conservatism.

Barack Obama doesn't have a gay son or lesbian daughter to protect from the harm and discrimination of bigotry and ignorance. Yet, he issued a proclamation declaring June as National Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month. “I am proud to be the first president to appoint openly LGBT candidates to Senate-confirmed positions in the first 100 days of my administration,” he wrote.

Additionally, he has partnered with the LGBT community to advance a wide range of initiatives. At the international level, he has joined forces with the United Nations to combat the criminalization of homosexuality worldwide. And domestically has pledged to support measures “that bring the full spectrum of equal rights to LGBT Americans.”

The President is sophisticated enough to put aside his personal feelings because he understands that inequity for the LGBT community is disparaging to us all, whether we realize it or not. “If we can work together to advance the principles upon which our nation was founded,” he said, “every American will benefit . . . I call upon . . . Congress and the American people to work together to promote equal rights for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity . . . . I call upon the people of the United States to turn back discrimination and prejudice everywhere it exists.”

This speaks directly to the core difference between the current and previous administrations. Altruism v. greedy self-interest.

Posted by: paulcaubet | June 14, 2009 10:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Better late than never, but it sounds to me like he's still not willing to extend full faith and credit, as the federal constitution requires.

Posted by: lepidopteryx | June 2, 2009 3:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company