Religious Progressives, Conservatives: Talking Past Each Other
By Jacqueline L. Salmon
What's most interesting about a report released today that compares conservative and progressive religious activists is how much the two groups are talking past each other. No wonder they cannot come to agreement on issues. They're not even in the same universe.
The report, by the Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron, is a survey of 7,200 conservative and progressive religious activists. You could argue that much of it was predictable--conservative religoous activities approach their faith in different ways and have different political priorities.
But the degree is astounding and suggests that the various "common ground" efforts to find consensus between the constituencies will have very difficult time achieving any traction.
First, they have strikingly different issue priorities. While 83 percent of religious conservatives rated abortion as "very important," a mere 7 percent of progressive activists did. Same story with same-sex marriage: two-thirds of conservative activities gave it a high priority, while less than one-tenth of progressive activists did.
On the flip side, three-quarters of progressive activists ranked poverty as a "very important" issue, while less than one-quarter of conservative activists did.
And the big issue, health care: Two-thirds of progressive activists ranked it as a top priority, while only one-tenth of conservative activists did.
The only issue that both sides saw as very important was immigration--one-fifth of progressive activists gave it a top priority, as did one-quarter of conservative activists.
From a theological viewpoint, the same dynamic applies. Close to one-half of conservative religious activists believe that Scripture is the word of God. Among progressive religious activists--a miniscule 3 percent.
As commentator E.J. Dionne said at the press conference at which the survey was released, "Is there any way these guys could get together and agree on anything?"
By
Jacqueline L. Salmon
|
September 15, 2009; 3:55 PM ET
| Category:
God in Government
Save & Share:
Previous: Health Secretary: Communion Controversy Over Abortion "Painful" |
Next: Bishops Push Heath-Care 'Safety Net' for Illegal Immigrants
Posted by: DOUGLASFIELD2 | September 18, 2009 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I think it should be noted that the survey found only 3% of the progressive activists said Scripture was the LITERAL word of God, not just "the word of God." Most progressives have a deep reverence for scripture and see God's inspiration in it, but yet do not take every single sentence literally. There is a huge difference in these concepts.
Posted by: bethd714 | September 16, 2009 10:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter










* THE FINE ART OF DENYING 45 MILLION AMERICANS HEALTH~CARE IN OUR JUDEO~CHRISTIAN NATION *
AMERICAN RELIGIOUS LEADERS ALL ACROSS THE USA HAVE ALWAYS BEEN ABLE TO COUNT ON THEIR RELIGIOUS FLOCK TO CONTRIBUTE(TITHE)THEIR HARD EARNED MONIES TO THEIR MINISTRIES EVERY WEEK.
THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS ATTENDING RELIGIOUS SERVICES IN THE U.S. ARE MIDDLE~CLASS AND WORKING POOR CITIZENS WHO NOW DESPERATELY NEED THE HELP AND SUPPORT FROM THESE SAME U.S.RELIGIOUS LEADERS IN LOBBYING THE U.S.CONGRESS TO PROVIDE PROPER HEALTH~CARE FOR ALL POORER AMERICANS.
***THERE ARE CURRENTLY AN ESTIMASTED 45 MILLION MEN WOMAN AND CHILDREN WITHOUT HEALTH~CARE IN THE WEALTHIEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD????
SILENT AMERICAN RELIGIOUS LEADERS WHO ALL HAVE HEALTH~CARE FOR THEMSELVES AND THEIR FAMILIES IS MUCH MORE FRIGHTENING THEN THE POSSIBLE DENIAL OF A FUTURE HEALTH~CARE PLAN FOR ALL...
LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS (424-247-2013)
lawyersforpooreramericans@yahoo.com