Guest Voices

Can religion solve conflicts in the Middle East?

By Bishop Dr. Munib A. Younan
Common Ground News

Is religion the problem in the Middle East conflict? Or can religion be the solution?

Many people have opted for the former, observing that so often the negative side of religion is what is being covered in the news. Those who attract the cameras are people we call hardliners--like Pastor Jones in Florida earlier this month--those who appear inflexible, and leave no room for compromise. They are the ones stoking the flames of the conflict and creating an image that religion is at the heart of the ongoing struggle.

Is the problem religion or extremism in religion?

The answer can be found in an early Christian text: "Those who say, 'I love God,' and hate their brothers or sisters, are liars; for those who do not love a brother or sister whom they have seen, cannot love God whom they have not seen" (I John 4:20).

At the heart of Christianity are two principles: love of God and love of neighbor, as Jesus himself taught (Matthew 22:37-40). Yet this was not original with Jesus. It came right out of the Jewish Torah. Islam teaches the same.

The problem is not Islam, or Judaism, or Christianity. The problem is when certain individuals claim to be speaking for God, or defending God, and act counter to this core teaching that love for God shows itself in respect for the other. We call such individuals extremists.

In his book, When Religion Becomes Evil, Charles Kimball writes, "Whatever religious people may say about their love of God or the mandates of their religion, when their behavior toward others is violent and destructive, when it causes suffering among their neighbors, you can be sure the religion has been corrupted and reform is desperately needed... Conversely, when religion remains true to its authentic sources, it is actively dismantling these corruptions."

I see a second problem, hinted at by Kimball. When mainline Christians, Muslims, and Jews--and especially their leaders--remain silent and timid about these core values, they allow themselves to be held hostage to the extremists, and they in a sense are contributing to the problem.

So the solution is not to remove religion from the political discussion. Religion must play a role as the guardian of the politicians, as Dietrich Bonhoeffer said, we as religious leaders need to become more engaged and to speak out more forcefully to "dismantle the corruptions" and give a vision of life together in all its diversity.

I would like to suggest three steps that we can take, bringing religion back into the public sphere in a positive way. Religion must be: prophetic, a catalyst for reconciliation, and offer peace education.

There are plenty of examples throughout history, when religion has turned political rather than prophetic; when it legitimized the political power of the day rather than offering a self-critical prophetic word; when it remained silent and complicit, rather than risk losing privileges and status. The Hebrew prophets are our example in addressing truth and justice. The situation in Palestine-Israel today needs prophetic voices that call for security for Israel and justice for Palestinians in order to achieve historic reconciliation.

The late Pope John Paul II held that there is "No peace without justice, no justice without forgiveness." These were not just empty words. He humbled himself in asking for forgiveness for past actions of the Roman Catholic Church against the Jewish people. We need statesmen and religious leaders to learn from him, confessing the sins of the past to enable new beginnings.

Reconciliation is not simply the absence of hatred. Our people need to learn how to create a shared vision of common values and a shared hope for the future.

This is why peace education is crucial. We can make a start by teaching about other religions without prejudice and misrepresentation--just as the Council of Religious Institutions in the Holy Land has already begun a project monitoring Israeli and Palestinian textbooks.

Religion can have a positive role in the current peace negotiations when it emphasizes love of God showing itself as love for the other.

To live with other religions, cultures, races, languages and traditions is an art. But it is an art we must learn, practice and perfect if we want our children to be able to live together in peace--with human rights, dignity, religious freedom, cultural liberty and justice for all.


Bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Jordan and the Holy Land; a key member of the interfaith Council of Religious Institution of the Holy Land (www.crihl.org) and the recently elected President of Lutheran World Federation".

By By Bishop Dr. Munib A. Younan  |  September 30, 2010; 11:13 AM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Finding God and my father at Normandy | Next: What matters more than biblical literacy?

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Put another way, when you have a blogger, who in appalling ignorance, fixates on the "OT" (Tanakh), who week after week comments upon it, who is, in fact, a former Hindu(!), knows nothing of Tanakh, who refers to Abraham as "pond scum," he is telling you religion will not help bring peace.

Reply:

Please enlighten us all Ms. Professor-know-it-all-NOT when did religion bring peace in these past 6000 years.
===========================================

When such a blogger, brings up out of context, every week, often several times a week, vilifications of this text, with no knowledge of Christian typology vs. Judaic levels of interpretation, reads from mistranslations, and, fails to do any of the recommended reading simply in order to spread hatred, religion is not the answer.
___________________________________________

Same old drivel mis-translations and contexts. Same old bull I heard from Hindus, Muslims, Christians & you. I generally do not hear much of this from Jews, except you.
===========================================

And let me add, that the enslavement of two hundred fifty million people, the Dalit, ignored by the world, is also underwritten by religion, Hinduism. This can change, but will require rereading of sacred texts, which some Indian Hindus have begun.
___________________________________________

Of course it is under written in Hindu scripture what do you expect from religion some kind of morality, ethics and compassion. You have seen one you have seen them all musty old tomes should have been cast in to the dust heap of history.
===========================================

In the meantime, the Christian West befriends Apartheid India (literally, Apartheid) because there is money in it.
___________________________________________

Lady you have no clue what "literally" even means. What the hell do you know of Indian constitution and statutes. You come to this blog with skull full of mush. One pf the first thing Indians did once gaining independence is abolish all castism and made provision for affirmative action. If there is continued discrimination it is because of religion not because of secular law. In apartheid south Africa ruling elite codified everything into law not just religion. All this venom from you is because I described your OT heroes in stark terms. Whatever explanations you may have the character of Abraham is nothing but pond scum. In your book the whole world was over flowing with honey & milk, especially the holy land till Gentile Romans came along. And then the whole thing went down the tubes for last 2010 years. Why don't you write book and see how many will under write it.

Posted by: Secular | October 2, 2010 12:24 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Put another way, when you have a blogger, who in appalling ignorance, fixates on the "OT" (Tanakh), who week after week comments upon it, who is, in fact, a former Hindu(!), knows nothing of Tanakh, who refers to Abraham as "pond scum," he is telling you religion will not help bring peace.

When such a blogger, brings up out of context, every week, often several times a week, vilifications of this text, with no knowledge of Christian typology vs. Judaic levels of interpretation, reads from mistranslations, and, fails to do any of the recommended reading simply in order to spread hatred, religion is not the answer.

You are dealing here with a blogger who is militantly ignorant, has decided to remain so. Will learn nothing of Judaism of which Tanakh is a founding text. And he is not alone. There are Muslims who view NT in the same way.

I should add that there are Christians and Jews who have read and well understand the essentialism and racism in the NT, understand that the bodies of millions of Jews have been strewn in unmarked graves in the wake of the NT. Not to mention Muslims, animists, and HIndus. And atheists and agnostics. However, when an ignorant, bigoted coward, finds it easier to deal with a text not his own, religion is not the answer. He is following those Christians who wish to cast off the "OT" though they have used it to authorize their "NT," and somehow leave the "NT" in tact.

In so doing, of course, they cannot recognize the hatred in that latter text, the essentialism that underwrites it. Then there are those who are simple cowards. And there are the brave, the academics, clerics, including ministers and priests who have taken the Jew hating NT to task and demanded its recognition.
Former HIndus are not among them.

And let me add, that the enslavement of two hundred fifty million people, the Dalit, ignored by the world, is also underwritten by religion, Hinduism. This can change, but will require rereading of sacred texts, which some Indian Hindus have begun.

In the meantime, the Christian West befriends Apartheid India (literally, Apartheid) because there is money in it.

Blind, haters and blind religious nation states, including Apartheid America, which relegates its native Americans to "reservations," demonstrate well that religion in the public domain undergirds not a "peace process" but a "War Process" and this it has always done. Religion underwrites slavery and genocide. Thus Hindus use their sacred texts to oppress the Dalit, and Adolf Hitler quoted liberally from the NT (sic) to eliminate on third of the Jews in this world.

Posted by: FarnazMansouri2 | October 1, 2010 2:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Middle East problems (read Isreali-Palestinian conflict) are best solved by Israelis and Palestinians. Not secular Indian Americans, not Indonesian-Malaysian Muslims among others.

Posted By: Jihadist
_______________________________________________

Let's not kid ourselves that we are solving this conflict. We are all commenting because the thread is Washington Post and not in some mid-eastern subscription only newspaper. The title of this thread is "Can religion solve conflicts in the Middle East?" Lets not go off the deep end and discuss everything else such as Hinduism or US involvement around the world. If you wished to share your opinions about US there is never a dearth of that topic on this blog. Likewise, if you wanted to share your opinions about Hinduism there were 3 or 4 threads just this past week. If you cannot stick to title of the thread, it is best you keep out.

Posted by: Secular | October 1, 2010 12:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Please go on bishop...
I believe you're starting from a reasonable foundation.

Posted by: Kingofkings1 | September 30, 2010 11:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Another thing, Bishop, as you know. In Jordan, though Palestinians are the majority, you among them, Bishop, they continue to face discrimination. See the problem?

Posted by: FarnazMansouri2 | September 30, 2010 10:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Christians need to solve their own problems. The first would be getting out of Aghanistan and ending their endless interference in Iran, Pakistan, and other nations.

Hinduists need to stop enslaving two hundred fifty million Dalit, get out of Kashmir where the new roaming young men do not want them. REcently more mass graves were discovered in Kasmir. The Kashmiri want an end to the checkpoints, and the one hundred thousand Indians OUT.

The Hindus also need to get out of Bangaladesh and stop interfering. Finally, they need to stop treating Indian Muslims as second-class citizens, as now even Indian Hindu elite academics are joining that discussion.

There is no way I can see for John to figure in this, given his attitude toward Jews. I think some Christians are well intended, but they really should butt out. The answers if they come at all, which I strongly doubt, will come from Palestinians and Israelis, the Muslims and Jews, and it would probably be best if those who negotiate have strong secular voices.

The biggest problem remains Hamas. Hamas and Fatah conflict, often armed, will undermine everything. Syria is the wildcard. It's starting to get confused. Has moved women wearing hijab out of public view, is beginning to get paranoid about "extremists," while supporting Hezbollah and Hamas. It does need Iran to support Greater Syria (formerly Lebanon), but being left out of the "peace process" makes Syria nervous, as Iran is beginning to. Iran is too "religious."

Posted by: FarnazMansouri2 | September 30, 2010 9:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Middle East problems (read Isreali-Palestinian conflict) are best solved by Israelis and Palestinians. Not secular Indian Americans, not Indonesian-Malaysian Muslims among others.

After all, certain Indian American secularists have too many chips on their soldiers against religions and believers, including the Abrahamic faith groups to grasp, among other things, the religious rationale for the creation of Israel too.

After all too, some Indians, both Hindus and seculars, in and outside still can't get over Muslim invasion and occupation of "India" on their land, never mind the Aryans were also invaders to India and occupiers of Dravidians, putting in place and/or perpetuating the caste system.

We never see parallels in history. Nor care for them much. After all, each and every people's country and situation are held to be unique and particular to them.

Posted by: Jihadist | September 30, 2010 4:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Religion has been the source of the current situation. Your evangelical brethren of last century wanting to hasten the second coming floated the notion of a Jewish state in Palestine. Some Zionists, who were really secular with noble cause to ameliorate the European Jewery's plight jumped on the only plausible chance, which later taken advantage by the bigots such as begin and others caused the problem. The islamic jihadists, who instead of making the best of the bad situation got into their bigoted heads that they can throw the Jews into the sea and such blunderbuss have been prolonging the suffering of the innocents. And you now claim religion will be the solution. We had enough of your religion stuff.

Posted by: Secular | September 30, 2010 3:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company