Anthony M. Stevens-Arroyo
Director, Research Center for Religion in Society and Culture

Anthony M. Stevens-Arroyo

Anthony M. Stevens-Arroyo is Professor Emeritus of Puerto Rican and Latino Studies at Brooklyn College and Distinguished Scholar of the City University of New York.

 ALL POSTS

Leader of the Movement, not the Party

It is tempting to believe that the U.S. political system of two parties is an immutable standard for democracy. It is not. Were the historical Jesus in our midst, he would oppose the notion that running within the system would produce a president to change the system. By examining his stance towards the political parties of his day – the Pharisees and the Sadducees – Jesus’ renunciation of both is unmistakable.

That is not to say that Jesus was an immature fool who did not recognize political and social realities. My reading of the best of the scripture scholars affirms that Christ’s central conviction was that the Messianic Age was about to begin. It was not necessarily the “End of the World” in Hollywood-style, with the heavens opening and angels descending; but it did represent an inversion of values. In the Messianic Age, the powers of the world and the influence of wealth and injustice would be corrected by God’s powerful Hand. Those on the bottom would rise and those in power would be toppled. (His mother more or less predicted it in her Magnificat.)

All of the above make Jesus into a leader of a movement rather than a political candidate. His movement came before rationalists invented a dichotomy between belief and action or between church and state. The values of the Jesus Movement concerned justice, altruism, and the capacity to turn suffering into witness, i.e. martyrdom. If we had to look for U.S. political figures who led movements we would have a list with names as varied as Tom Paine, Patrick Henry, John Brown, Mother Jones, Eugene Debs, Susan B. Anthony, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X and César Chavez. What the life experiences of each of the above demonstrate is the non-transferability of moral conviction into a political commodity. In fact, failure, frustration and assassination are the common results. The difference with Jesus is his rising from the dead: it assaults every rational premise that tells us “nice guys finish last.”

By Anthony M. Stevens-Arroyo  |  March 7, 2008; 4:41 PM ET  | Category:  Religion & Leadership Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: How Would Jesus Vote? | Next: The Grand Inquisitor's Veto: Bush Vetoes Torture Bill

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Catholics consider themselves to be Christians. Christians say they follow the teachings of the Christ. Jesus said God’s Word is truth (John 17:17). Would Christ be involved in politics? What does the Bible teach?

Jesus was not interested in or part of any political movement. When he was offered political power he refused it. (John 6:14&15) And rightly so, because Jesus knows Jehovah God’s purpose for the earth will not be realized through human governments but through God’s heavenly government.(Matthew 6:10&11)

Posted by: Christie | June 10, 2008 11:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Funny I have not been faithfully religious for years but this presidential campaign has brought me back to my long forgotten foundations. I don't pay much attention until somebody or something is radically off the path of what I learned was a foundation for Christianity. I consider myself liberal until things are so messed up I can't see Christianity anymore. One foundation I learned was a given for Christians was Church is for worshipping GOD, peroid. Giving God the sidelines in Church is a nauseating reality that causes me disgust and fear. Jesus was not political or racist and he would not condone a church such as Barack Obama's Chicago congrefation of Trinity United Church of Christ. Jesus would not condone a commitment to Black people, a commitment to Africa, Black leaders, Black liberation...A Nonnegotiable commitment to Africa, a church that asks for a commitment of personal resources to BLACK leaders. The fact that so many people ignore the conflicts between the Ten Commandments and this church and support Obama anyway scares me as it makes me wonder if popularity has become more important to people and GOD is now a sideline. This is not a racial issue for me. It is not about Black or white but one of People, and allegiance to GOD's word. How could one unite all colors in such a church? Impossible. How could one explain to a white or Bi-racial or Hispanic child or person the exclusive focus on BLACK people in a church of GOD? I found a youtube video that asks just that. Apparently I am not the only one who finds this sidelining of God in a church that calls itself a Christian church contradictory.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMP40jSMqBE
In this a video a bi-racial family visits Trintiy United Church of Christ and the family sees the conflict through the child's eyes. "Doesn't God love Everyone?" the child asks. "Then why do they say BLACK people all the time?", the child asks. Why indeed? Blacks and Whites are coming together as friends, neighbors and spouses, and in this church they can't be together as GOD intended.

Posted by: Jaloney Caldwell | March 13, 2008 1:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Our panelist writes: "It was not necessarily the “End of the World” in Hollywood-style, with the heavens opening and angels descending; but it did represent an inversion of values."

I don't think the Romans got the memo. God's hand seems not so powerful given the wealth of evidence around us.

Posted by: TJ | March 11, 2008 4:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Historical Jesus? Is Jesus now a proven historical fact? When did this happen?

Posted by: trailing begonia | March 11, 2008 11:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Lawyer missing after criticising China's human rights record

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/08/china.olympicgames2008

Posted by: FRIEND | March 8, 2008 6:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with the Prof that the Jesus Movement, per se, should be "in the world but not of it".

However, in the practical sense, it is men and women who must transform the world -- at least until Jesus' return. And transformative change can certainly come from within individuals, and social structures (e.g., political parties), both.

It is past time for people of good will and high ethical standards -- irrespective of religious orientation -- to retake the reins of both political parties and the government itself. Our children, and our childrens' children, demand it of us.

Posted by: loco_moco | March 8, 2008 10:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

There will be a rewind says the Lord, a rewind then a moving forward, from the past of what has already happened. Then they will say what do we do and why did we do this? Believe Me says the Lord this will be a way to learn and relearn what you have forgotten. For when April comes they will say is it too late for it to happen. For the year will be over and the will belong to Me says the Lord.

What do I speak of you ask? And I tell you that they will want to turn back the clock of time and I will not allow for in order to gain what is right there will be nothing of the sort. I will push them forward as they look to the one who is Radiant and Bright. And when they find him they will go to the Word and look at wars and hear of wars now and I will sow My plant in fertile soil and not where the pests are I will take those who are plotting deceit out and bring the righteous into the storehouse! I will take what has been lost and hidden from the sight of the prophet’s and reveal them the secrets of Armageddon! I will have the rams horn blow I will send My angels and Jerusalem will be an everlasting home for Me says the Lord.

The fundamentalist of religion will get knocked to the ground for their corruption watch what I do with the legal fundamentalists as they will be purged I will cleanse this nation of those who are misusing their privileges for the sake of My servants. I am going to begin this in Texas and Ohio you will see it, you will see it happen My servants will be brought up and raised up in this time and they will come from the fires of My potters wheel and I have molded them so that they will bend and not break. For in the times of the exposure of the nakedness of the fundamentalists I will put them in their proper place, I the Lord have waited for change and now I will bring the change that I was molding.

http://jcudell.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Joshua | March 7, 2008 5:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Professor Stevens-Arroyo:

You said:
What the life experiences of each of the above demonstrate is the non-transferability of moral conviction into a political commodity.

I would say that the eventual outcome of most of those mentioned was legislation. For example, the 19th amendment in Susan B. Anthonies case, the Civil Rights act of 1964 in Martin Luther Kings case, or Social Security in Eugene Debs case.

Posted by: FRIEND | March 6, 2008 5:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company