Discrimination: not with my tax dollars
Q:If a church or other religious organization receives government funding, should it follow all government rules, including those against discrimination based on sexual orientation? Or should government exempt such organizations from requirements that violate particular religious beliefs?
I certainly do not believe any religious institution taking Government funding to provide social services to the community has a right to discriminate. The Government does not discriminate when collecting taxes. Everyone, irrespective of color, race or sexual orientation is required to pay their fair share of taxes. And if that money is given to organizations that provide services then they must provide those services without discrimination. I resent the fact that my tax dollars are being used to promote someone's political agenda. If the Catholic Church, or anyone else for that matter, finds this difficult to do then they should shut down all their services and focus only on promoting their religion with funding collected from their congregations. Or, if they wish to continue practicing discrimination in the social services they provide, then let them raise the money required for the purpose from private sources. It seems odd that they are willing to take money from people with different ideologies and different sexual orientation and then discriminate in the services they provide. I think it is most unethical for the Catholic Church to behave in this manner.
By
Arun Gandhi
|
March 8, 2010; 5:26 AM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: What does "proselytize" really mean? |
Next: The problem with outsourcing compassion
Posted by: peterhuff | March 14, 2010 1:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment
No taxation without representation was the rallying cry of America's fledgling nation yet now it seems the Government is happy to use taxes to try to force the Catholic Church to have its own hospitals, social welfare organisations and schools abandon what they represent.
There is no need to try and force Catholic institutions to betray what they represent It is bigotry and religious persecution and an abuse of catholic taxes.
Many of these institutions were originally built with no Government funding at all Government funding only came in in the last half 50 years before that every brick was paid for by the sheer blood sweat and tears of catholic people.The same applies to other religious denominations.
Posted by: marymack77 | March 14, 2010 8:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter










Should government monies be used to fund religious groups?
It depends on what that group is doing. The apostle James said that religion that Gods accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.
Polluted by the world means taking on values that are worldly instead of godly. As Christians we are to treat all people with dignity and respect, but that does not mean that we cannot say when something is wrong and stand against it.
I've witnessed missionaries in Asia working hand in hand with the poor, and not for any earthly reward, simply to be the compassion as the hands, feet and heart of Jesus. They were working with people that others had given up on, and in the process put their health at great risk.
So there is a synergism between Government and religious groups that the Government recognizes. Sometimes these groups go where others can not or will not tread. And in the case of this group that I was privileged to see, they worked in a Muslim region in which the only means of witnessing to their faith was in Christian acts of service to those less fortunate than you or I.
As for discriminating, the kind the question identifies, 'those against discrimination based on sexual orientation' there are certain things that faith in God teaches. It teaches us to discriminate between things that are morally right and wrong. So here are a few questions for you:
What is the highest form of authority that you can appeal to in judging right and wrong? How do you know this is true?
Do you not think that truth is discriminating? Does it not discriminate against falsehood?