Non-sectarian laws and judges

For a country that prides itself as being the most advanced and the most compassionate, America tends to bring religion into issues where it does not necessarily belong. Whether in government or courts of law or educational institutions, we don't need sectarian religion of any kind. Even if the other religions are a minority it does not mean the majority must impose its rituals or religion on others.

The question applies to two recent events: First, whether the Supreme Court can function without any Protestant representation; and, second, the outrageous statement made by Franklin Graham that only Christians can go to heaven and that other religions are either evil or insignificant. He seems to forget that some of the most Christ-like people in modern times have been non-Christians.

As for the Supreme Court, I think it is important that the judges display moral and ethical rectitude and the ability to judge equitably. I am sure this can be done irrespective of whether they are Jews, Catholics or Protestants or, for that matter, Hindus, Muslims or Buddhists.

By Arun Gandhi  |  May 12, 2010; 6:36 PM ET Save & Share:                 
Previous: No Protestants? Also no non-Abrahamic faiths | Next: Touched by a Text

The comments to this entry are closed.