Arun Gandhi
Co-founder of the M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence

Arun Gandhi

Gandhi is the fifth grandson of India’s legendary leader, Mohandas K. “Mahatma” Gandhi. He worked for 30 years as a journalist for The Times of India.

 ALL POSTS

Do people marry or religions marry?

Chelsea Clinton, raised Methodist, and Marc Mezvinsky, Jewish, will wed this weekend.

Statistics show that 37 percent of Americans have a spouse of a different faith.

Statistics also show that couples in interfaith marriages are "three times more likely to be divorced or separated than those who were in same-religion marriages."

Is interfaith marriage good for American society? Is it good for religion? What is lost -and gained -when religious people intermarry?


It is amazing that almost a third of the inter-religious marriages end in a divorce in the United States. I think this is very largely due to the belief that religions are getting married instead of people getting married. I don't have comparative statistics of inter-religious marriages in other countries so I don't know where the United States stands in world ranking on this issue but I do know that where two people in love from different religious backgrounds have made it work and yet followed their different beliefs. Where religions are very radically different it does raise some long-term issues, especially with children. Which religion should they follow, is the most common one? Often that grows into a major crisis.

Normally, two people who are truly in love are expected to be mature enough to discuss all the pros and cons of inter-religious marriages before they get married and then follow the path agreed upon. Problems arise when Faith overpowers Love in which case Faith quite simply becomes an excuse for a marriage that is otherwise doomed to failure. If there is no abiding love between the couple then nothing will keep them together. Alternatively where there is love then any couple will find ways of overcoming all hurdles, including religious.

I think the United States is, perhaps, the only advanced country where the people are divided down the middle -- believers and non-believers. There appears to be no one in between. Both sides are deeply wedded to their belief and therefore most of them cannot make their own individual marriages last.

By Arun Gandhi  |  July 27, 2010; 1:42 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: It's marriage - no adjectives needed | Next: Interfaith marriage strengthens American tolerance

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Sometimes it really is a marriage of religions, though, at least from some points of view: in my own faith- community, it can be hard to see a boundary. We've had a lot of people come to Pagan ways through partners, and sometimes I see there's an element of coming to love our ways along with the person. I think it was similar with an atheist friend who married into Judaism.

The real problems I see in interfaith marriage often have to do with *privilege.* I've seen Christian-Pagan couples motor along fine and then hit the rocks once kids are involved and the Christian or their family says, 'For the sake of the kids/my relatives cut out this nonsense and submit/hide/convert/keep it from the kids.' ...there are often a lot of pressures to do these things for the 'wrong reasons' because the Christian relatives and affluent institutions tend to freak out/withdraw support if the child won't be raised in their ways, (And only their ways) and Pagan communities tend to be tolerant, ...and because of worries about stigma and all the usual that are actually threat of marginalization used to justify marginalization.

The problem with these things is they often aren't terribly honest, and that usually means trouble later in any relationship.

Anecdotally, I haven't seen as many of the same kinds of issues when someone from a majority religion 'marries into' a smaller one and associated community: not that it's without its own complications, but nothing that can't be worked out: minority religions may have concerns about traditions being 'watered down,' but also are far less accustomed to having their way as a matter of course.

For community/family purposes, the Unitarian Universalists often have a lot of good things going on in that way: being very pluralistic, and often actively-celebrating that, they're a place where families can celebrate together without necessarily having to make a social division of it.

Posted by: APaganplace | July 30, 2010 10:33 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Since the odds are up to fifty percent that any marriage in America might end in divorce, depending on the area, perhaps that statistic is a bit misleading. The more conservative-Christian the area, in fact, the higher the divorce rate, so perhaps that's not saying much in particular. One wonders if interfaith marriages are actually above the curve in those areas, or what.

I do think that the much-emphasized *polarization* between (certain kinds of) 'believers' and (certain kinds of) 'nonbelievers' can be somewhat misleading, as well. The media and much of the Internet gravitate toward emphasizing conflict and not looking at much else.

A lot of the people churches claim as members don't necessarily 'believe hard' and the majority of atheists are not the strident and 'anti-religion' ones that are so loud on the Internet. The fastest-growing demographic group in America are the 'Nones' who may encompass varying degrees of unaffiliated spirituality, some from alternative or personal paths, and varying degrees of nonbelief or agnosticism.

To my observation, interfaith marriages depend much on the particular religions involved: how much they are theologically-compatible and how picky/exclusivist they are: (I've seen different branches of Lutherans and other Protestants who may seem almost identical from the outside cause tremendous strife between couples and their communities over differences that seem trivial, for instance.

Perhaps it's not always about how different theologies are, but rather how much they respect difference.)


Posted by: APaganplace | July 30, 2010 10:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company