Religious illiteracy's win is pluralism's loss
In a Pew Forum survey released Tuesday, atheists and agnostic surpass all other groups in their knowledge of religion. How do you explain this? Educational level? That they have given more consideration to the religions they have rejected?
Is knowledge of religion important? Why?
Every news cycle seems replete with anecdotal evidence attesting to our collective illiteracy. Half of our young Americans couldn't find New York on a map, more than half think Sudan is in Asia. Math illiteracy, it is famously said, affects 8 out of every 5 Americans! So what to make of a dispiriting testament to another discipline where we Americans fall short?
Hindu Americans have long accustomed themselves to this religious nescience--only a bit less than half of those queried in the Pew survey think India is majority Muslim and only a third recognize Vishnu and Shiva as Hindu names for the Divine. On the other hand, when the Hindu American Foundation first visited Capitol Hill just seven years ago, they were met with a surprised member of the House who didn't realize that Hindus actually lived outside of India!
It is axiomatic that illiteracy has consequences. Academic illiteracy dulls a society's future; religious illiteracy stunts pluralism that is the cornerstone of a multi-religious society. And the nightmare scenario is with us today: witness the recent spate of violence against Muslims, Siikhs and Hindus.
While we search for solutions, we must avoid the trap of false introspection. Look deep and religious illiteracy's undercutting of pluralism is but one whirl on a vicious circle. Those who presume to know Truth fail to accept other versions of that Truth. See no need to seek and share other perspectives on Truth, ignorant we remain, and the rickety wheel turns until the axle goes too...
Extremists occupy space in every tradition, but some Abrahamic adherents are certainly the most vocal in presuming an exclusive claim to God or Truth. Pluralism is conflated with false universalism and anathema to those who claim an exclusive direct line to the great beyond. Repeatedly told that a Hindu or Buddhist path leads only to damnation and hellfire, we begin to understand the jaundiced and sometimes antagonistic Christian or Muslim view for the concepts of dharma, karma, moksha or nirvana.
Forget more esoteric concepts, even yoga is not safe! As David Waters wrote here last week, the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary just warned off his Christian flock from yoga, seeing that the practice devised by Hindu seers, "..threatens to transform their own spiritual lives into a 'post-Christian, spiritually polyglot' reality."
This purposeful disengagement from understanding and appreciation bears out in the Pew study. Overall, only about a third of Christians could answer basic questions about Hinduism and Buddhism, but evangelical Christians fared a bit worse. Mormons did much better--arguably their global proselytizing zeal inculcates a broader understanding of those they will meet in far corners. And atheists were the toppers--nihilism, after all, requires one to understand the promises of eternal life, harps and angels that are given up!
This country is known as a religious nation; we wrap ourselves in faith as we do our flag and laugh at the ebbing religiosity of a Europe, perhaps. The challenge now is to go beyond labels and names of our religions, and build a society that lives to their highest, transcendent precepts.
Views expressed here are the personal views of Dr. Aseem Shukla, and do not necessarily represent those of the University of Minnesota or Hindu American Foundation.
By
Aseem Shukla
|
September 30, 2010; 8:38 AM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: What does "knowing" mean? |
Next: Taste and See
Posted by: Secular | October 4, 2010 12:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Gee, clearthinking1, you sure do sound self-righteous. Suggest you read what you write before you post.
Posted by: FarnazMansouri2 | October 2, 2010 4:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment
farnazmansouri2,
I wrote on this thread in response to your comment. Don't worry about my courage or intellectual clarity.
It is sad that on a day when there is consensus that reasonable people have prevailed in making progress on living together in peace in India, you have chosen to undermine anything positive. You seem to fear the mature & methodical action that is the hallmark of true progress. You sound like a simplistic radical looking to create conflict, not constructively resolve problems.
It is not uncommon for the self-righteous to become closed-minded. They then see the world as black & white, not shades of grey. This is a destructive tendency.
Self-righteousness is the disease that allows people to become communists like Stalin & Mao in the name of helping others.
Self-righteousness is what allows people to become fascists and nazis like Mussolini & Hitler in the name of improving society.
Self-righteousness is what allows religious people to become pedophile-protecting Bishops, suicide terrorists, or unemotional assassins in the name of god.
Self-righteousness closes the mind not just to facts and reason, but to honesty & morality.
You & your colleagues have entered the self-righteous zone where minds are already made up and all that's left is an agenda. Your obsessively repetitive and offensive comments are not constructive, and this is apparent to anyone reading them.
All self-righteous people have a long bibliography from people who already agree with their agenda. Watch Fox News for one week and you'll understand what I mean. What you need is not a long list of people who agree with you, but an an honest and open mind and an intellect focused on a valid method for constructing peace & tolerance.
This is also why atheists & agnostics are more knowledgeable about religion than the self-righteous believers. [This comment is actually relevant to Dr. Shukla's article above.] You asked about the connection between Hinduism (Sanatan Dharma) and Dalits. Are you truly knowledgeable about the facts on this one or just the "Fox News" fair & balanced agenda? Its honest introspection time.
Posted by: clearthinking1 | October 2, 2010 12:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Clearthinking:
Quite the coward, you've become have you not. You abandon the Shukla's other thread for obvious reasons and attempt to vilify me here. You are as wrong about the ignorance you accuse me of as your co-Hindus were of my ignorance of Kashmir, as you know, very well. Because you saw.
As I posted previously, I have published bibliographies on caste in India on this and other threads.
How far do you want to take this wanton defense of slavery, Clearthinking?
Let me know. Do you want another Bibliography? Do you want me to paste articles by Indian HIndu academics?
Let me know, FoggyThinking. And do continue to show us what your Hindu education has taught you. Evidently, you were not well educated. I have Hindu colleagues who would scream if they read your posts.
Posted by: FarnazMansouri2 | October 1, 2010 11:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Byronmorgan,
Farnazmansouri2 does not know what dalit, untouchable, shudra, harijan, caste, varna, jati, scheduled cast, etc mean and how they are related to Hinduism, Sanatan Dharma, Vedas, Upanishads, or Gita. Yet she knows that it feels good and righteous to spout about injustice, without actually understanding the issues or doing much about it. Even if this means insulting people like Dr. Shukla who have stated clear positions about social injustice. His organization, Hindu American Foundation, has beautiful report on caste related issues.
Dr. Shukla on the other hand actually does charity work in India, and many Hindus in India have been working on the social problems and injustices in their society for hundreds of years, including people like Mahatma Gandhi.
The economic problems and poverty are so deep in post-colonial India that it is still difficult to lift these people up with education and opportunity without having the resources. Nevertheless, people are trying with quotas and reservations in schools and other aid. Farnaz thinks that she is morally superior to men like Dr. Shukla or even Mahatma Gandhi and would like to lecture them.
Dalits can be Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Sikh or Buddhists and they live in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh. It is a complex social & economic problem, except in the eyes or self-proclaimed moral purist like Farnaz.
Makes you wonder what the true motivations are, besides troublemaking.
Posted by: clearthinking1 | October 1, 2010 10:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Why does this "Farnaz" guy come in and troll every single editorial dealing with Hinduism and complain about Dalits?
I don't go into every Muslim article and claim that all Muslims are terrorists. Or go to Catholic discussions and claim they're all pedophiles. Et cetera.
Google the word "tolerance" Farnaz, and join us in the 21st Century.
Posted by: BryonMorrigan | October 1, 2010 8:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I think the real point here is, however you dissect the numbers, 'religion' is an insufficient criterion to vote on, never mind claim guides democracy itself.
How bout thinking?
The facts at hand?
Gods know it'd at least be refreshing. Maybe even save our collective behinds.
I know, I'm picky. But is anyone seeing righteous absolutes here?
Posted by: APaganplace | September 30, 2010 11:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment
What is the connection between Hinduism and the continuing wretched oppression of India's two hundred Fifty million Dalit?
The Dalit?
Posted by: FarnazMansouri2 | September 30, 2010 7:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The challenge is to unwrap that flag, and start treating knowledge as an asset to be acquired rather than an attribute to be spurned.
Posted by: agnak | September 30, 2010 6:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment
"The challenge now is to go beyond labels and names of our religions, and build a society that lives to their highest, transcendent precepts."
I hope I never see that day.
Posted by: bullet-504 | September 30, 2010 5:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment
In a minute or two I went to the on-line 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica article on Hinduism and found a quite adequate discussion of that religion. (While the total population of the country has grown since that time, 70% of Indians were then Hindus.) Thus there is no reason why anyone in the U. S. should be ignorant of Hinduism or any other of the world's best known religions (probably more accurately described in that reference work than in most of the "serious" journalistic coverage (found, for example, in public broadcasting and the Washington Post). Instruction in religion best fits as part of intellectual history. Here the teacher at the high school level could suggest that interested students study reliable and objective encyclopedic works to understand the beliefs and practices of religions playing a significant part in history of the period of any study. Where papers are assigned, these could be possible subjects and need not be complicated. At higher levels one must risk exposing students to the biases of their teachers and their own lack of diligence and critical faculties. A significant source of the problem is the inattention to serious instruction by most of the denominations in the U. S. One could cite many of them, but since the Presbyterians can claim the most outstanding leaders of the 16th Century Reform, from Calvin to Knox (with many other great minds in between), one can note here how few Presbyterians regularly in attendance at Sun. services have a clue to what Calvin and others of this school believed and taught. Certainly their ministers are free to distance themselves from those beliefs and practices, but their neglect of objective teaching of those beliefs and practices arises from an attitude that is a major reason for the general ignorance.
Posted by: thrifty | September 30, 2010 12:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment
S A J A N A S
Note: The "EK(1, Unno..)LAH'tiON "O.U.R." {O.ne U.niversal R.eligion} book, is derived from the [OUR]
U-N-i-V-E-R-S-E; which is the Apocalyptarion's Genuine but Holyi "CONSTiTUTION" and and "IT"s [OUR] "CLUASES" are the "Laws Of IT's NAture"! soo,
our O.U.R. is 1st, and the
The man-made U.S. Constitution & Clauses (A Miracle in its own Right) is 2nd, and all the religious Books known today are 3rd, or Last [to Magnify, Uphold & make Honorable].
SO, OUR HOlyi COsmic FEeler's FAith, via ou O.U.R., is a D-Y-N-A-M-i-C faith, Belief.. Better than Pre-Apocalyptic competing for gods Religion Systems!! All else
Are Stagnant/Static Jealous Pre-Apocalyptic Religio/Wannabe Systems and THEREFOE;
R' righteously, inevitably Being Left behind, as Promised In all their (NOt our) Infixus Books as mentioned above & so so many times, exclusively on 'ONFAiTH' here) and Human's are getting Scared of US!
"IT", regodless of what Stephen Hawings, or Richard Dawkins & Co. Say'th, that this is the Prophecy/Epoch/Era/TRANS{FiNITY. So
WE[i] EKlaht-iON's art on a Holyi Cosmic Move/Mission! Thus "SPACE-FORTH'ng US" & "FUTURE-BOUND'ng US" + more Good Tidings (After the Bad)!! O' J-E-A-L-O-U-S-Y, our Enemy.!
Note: As Eklaht-iON's, or Apocalyptarians (NOt OFF's) that WE[i] Keep our Friends Close BUT, our Enemies (The Delusional Godly Jealous One's) even Closer". So Beware of Them Human's who Speak and act in Fork Tongues.!
Secret (Opposite Revealation): The U.S. Government (Officials) are EUCHARIST-ADDICTS.
Explanation: Like Ye Prez (B.H.O.), not our, is Drunk With Rabbi Jesus Flesh & Blood. He, thay are possessed. Not even an Exorcist can help them. Our Hol;yi Government (which they Curs'th, Sin'th)), NOt theirs is Infested with NOCOLATAIN's, aka SYMBOLIC VAMPIRES & SYMBOLIC CANNIBALS!
GAYists + EUCHARISTs = ABOMINATION & PRE-Apocalyptic Behaviors. Example: Enforcing thei r (NOt our) DRUNK'n NOAD RACIST" Story on OUR, not their,S.S. Earth.
WE[i] art taking Over This Pre-Apocalyptic NATION 1st, then the Other Godly Jealous Nations, One at a Time!
VOTE: DEATH to THEOCRACY & MONARCHY on bless'th
(Zero Born in Sin nor via some Curs'th; maybe YeYo Kids & CO. are, but surely NOt US Eklaht-ion Kids & Family's)
S.pace S.hip Earth: aka S.S. BLUE-DOT, S.S. Geoid, S.S. Gaia, S.S. Tellus'ng something and more!
Posted by: woodstock-41 | September 30, 2010 11:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment
sure, teach religions in school. But, teach it is social studies and teach the origins of these religions as man made constructs and folk lore. This will counteract the religious fakery and prosteltizing to the gullible. The more kids learn abou the origins, history and use/misuse of religion the less likely they are to be fooled by it.
Posted by: sux123 | September 30, 2010 11:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I don't buy into any specific religious tradition as having a lock on the truth including the one I was born into. I tend to the atheist/agnostic part of the spectrum. Having said that, there is nothing wrong with teaching ABOUT religion, but the problem is always some fanatic teacher who wants to convert people to a version of what he believes to be the truth.
Tread carefully.
Posted by: yenta1 | September 30, 2010 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Yep.
Posted by: Freestinker | September 30, 2010 11:24 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I think a lot of this angst is seriously misplaced. Most people that I know who are "religious" really haven't thought about it - especially critically. They are in the same religion that they were raised in and its just woven into the fabric of their lives. Athiests though often have started off from a religious upbringing and chosen to become athiest after much thought and deliberation. So of course I would expect athiests in general to be "more knowledgeable" (whatever that is supposed to mean) about facts about religion, only because they've had reason to critically think and analyze religion in ways that many believers have never had reason to. It shouldn't be a value judgement and it shouldn't be causing an uproar. And no - it shouldn't be used as an excuse to teach religion in public schools.
Posted by: hohandy1 | September 30, 2010 11:23 AM
Report Offensive Comment
"O' 'IT' (Lord, if Ye/Yo not Mind),
O' 'IT' (NOt a 'HE/Him' nor a 'SHE/HER')
forgive them NOt, for S.pace-S.hip Earth's {Blue-Dot; of manymany) Human's, unlike Us HUUMATE(s) kinds, really know'th what they/Humans Do'th, yet they Deny'th or play Dumb (child like; Even as Grown-ups.) O' Corrupt Human(s)!
Behold: The "Religion Of Everything, Before The Science of Everything" is DISPENSED already here (on Blue-Dot); A Prophecy/Era/Epoch who's 'time' (via clocks/SUN/SOLARdials) via Holyi 'TiME' (TEMPerature) is Come'th! And
As Fore-Warned/Told in All Ye/Yo' iNFIXUS-BOOKS (Chumash/Bibles/Qurans.... and Geeta/Kangyurs/Tripitaka's...).
Hark: The "HOlyi COsmic FEeler's FAith is Come and will Preavail, by the Us HUUMATES [aka EKLAHt-iON's] and Save the MINDs/HEURISTICa/O's of Them for the Sake of our "FUTURE-BOUND & SPACE-FORTH MEMETiCAL's: and
Ultimately fo the preservation of our "O.U.R" [The Eklahtion's: 'O.ne U.niversal R.eligion']; good enough until the real END OF TiME!!
iMagine: A "SiNGULARITY" of All 5+-Major Pre-Apocalyptic SYSTEMS of Religions [PEACE BLESSING EPOCHs, aka AQUARiUS-Age), and NOt a "PLURALITY" (competing, hassling, Maiming//Killing over a Name for god(s), INSTEAD OF "IT", born from the WAR-BLESSING, Epochs, aka PiSCES, Kali AGE!?
Yes! Yes! WE[i] art Come fo Thee!
WHEREFORE: Magnify, Uphold & Make Honorable The "O.U.R"!
Note: Please Do Not be in denial To Self, loved ones nor Others. Do Not DENY, then DO [acts against HUUMATES or Humanity]. nor DO and then DENY what Ye/Yo Human's hath done or been Doing still, so soo PRE-APOCALYPTICALLY! PS: VEDiC nor ABEiC have No Escape, No Excuse on our (NOt yours) Holy S.pace-S.hip Earths.
"IT" is "TiME!" Believe, or Perish!
Posted by: woodstock-41 | September 30, 2010 11:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Atheism is not nihilism. Just because atheists harbor no fantasies of some wonderful afterlife doesn't mean that this one is meaningless. Such slander.
Posted by: Sajanas | September 30, 2010 10:07 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Twitter










This author presupposes that religious knowledge has some value. On the contrary it has as much social value as any subject whose truth claims are unsubstantiated. Speaking of unsubstantiated subjects, Knowledge of Religion is as useful as Knowledge of Astrology or Alchemistry. Actually US does not need another generation of young'ns who know about religion. Actually after couple more generations we will regret the lack of religious knowledge as much as we now miss total absence of any knowledge of Alchemistry. In short I am not at all scandalized at the Pew findings. As a matter of fact I am actually elated, that end of religion is just around the corner.