Government should keep out of end-of-life questions

End-of-life care should be managed and decided between the patient, the patient's family, and medical professionals. Government should be kept out of the consultation.

Millions of Americans have thought ahead about end-of-life care and have created living wills. I have myself. I have made it clear to my family and my physicians that I do not want to prolong dying unnaturally, nor do I want my death to be hastened unnaturally.

But that's my decision, not some bureaucrat or health-care czar's. If we allow the government to get involved in this kind of a decision, you can count on this: The government's decision will not be made in the best interests of the individual patient. The deciding factors will be cost and the government's view of what course of action provides "the greatest good for the greatest number"--which is just dandy if you happen belong to the greatest number. The greatest good for the greatest number is the ethical formulation called utilitarianism, which led to the horrors of eugenics.

Don't believe this will happen? Check out the Florida Department of Health's draft guidelines in case of an H1N1 emergency. The state has already published "the greatest good for the greatest number" as the standard for determining who will get care and who will not be worth the effort to save.

By Charles "Chuck" Colson  |  November 6, 2009; 9:36 AM ET Save & Share:                 
Previous: This about Islam or Islamophobia? | Next: Fort Hood: Trauma is contagious

The comments to this entry are closed.