National Day of Non-Prayer?
Thursday is National Day of Prayer, as mandated by Congress. What should President Obama do? Should he follow tradition and sign a ceremonial proclamation? Should he follow President George W. Bush's practice of hosting a formal White House event? Should he ignore it completely?
Imagine this hypothetical companion headline: "President Obama will also sign a proclamation Friday recognizing National Day of Non-Prayer." Obama would explain that he's being inclusive, as in previous declarations that the U.S. is "no longer a Christian nation," echoed in his inaugural address that America is a nation of many faiths and "nonbelievers."
Of course, I would not expect the president to set aside a special day for what I happily choose to do every day--not pray. And President Obama was wrong to say we were once a Christian nation. We were founded as, and remain, a secular nation, where individuals can pray to one, many, or no gods. We are a nation whose constitution favors neither religion nor non-religion.
Historically, the overwhelming majority of Americans were Christians, and Christianity is still the dominant religion. However, the majority of Americans are also white, and we don't call ourselves a white nation or ask the president to promote a National White Day. Actually, here in South Carolina, a former head of the Charlestown County school board, John Graham Altman, objected to "Black History Month." So he proposed a "White History Month," which received proper public disapproval.
Most Americans would give priority to black history, women's studies, and GLBT programs over their race, gender, and sexual orientation counterparts. Not because we know all there is to know about whites, men, and heterosexuals, but because we recognize how underrepresented are the contributions of certain groups against whom we have long discriminated. Altman's antebellum attitude might be an argument for why a non-prayer day would be more enlightening than a prayer day.
A Hindu friend of mine would be both surprised and delighted if President Obama were to call for a national day to recognize the god Vishnu, to which Christian friends would object even more than I. Vishnu is as real to me as is Yahweh, Zeus, and any other gods. But National Vishnu Day would at least give Americans something to think about, and in my mind, thinking is more effective than praying.
I do congratulate President Obama for not making as big a deal of the National Day of Prayer as did President Bush, and it would be silly to request a non-prayer day. But a president who wants to base decisions more on evidence than on faith might consider issuing a proclamation recognizing a "National Day of Reason." Who could object to a president promoting reason?
By
Herb Silverman
|
May 5, 2009; 2:20 PM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Prayer Doesn't Require Presidential Endorsement |
Next: Religion Safer in Hands of the People
Posted by: walter-in-fallschurch | May 11, 2009 12:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Robin and Walter,
I like the way your think!
Posted by: Nevermore531 | May 10, 2009 7:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment
that's what today we would call "pandering."
on the religious views of our founders (to quote myself...):
They were “Deists” – the sort of fuzzy philosophical “religion” Christians rail about. The God of Deism created the Universe and its physical laws, but stays out of earthly affairs. He does not write scripture and is not interested in us or our salvation. Dutch Reformed minister William Linn, in his 1800 pamphlet, Serious Considerations on the Election of a President, accused JEFFERSON of not believing in divine revelation, trying to destroy religion and seeking to “introduce immorality.” He warned that an “infidel like Jefferson could not, should not, be elected.” The problem was that Jefferson believed Jesus was a great moral teacher, but not the Son of God. Jefferson had no use for the Old Testament, and edited all the miracles and dogma out of the New Testament to create a tidy little handbook commonly called “The Jefferson Bible.” You can see how this would have upset Minister Linn. Interestingly, from its publication in 1904 until 1957, when Christian congressmen put an end to it, freshmen members of congress were given a copy of Jefferson’s apocryphal Bible.
MADISON was more discrete than Jefferson in dismissing Christianity. Nonetheless Episcopal Bishop of Virginia, William Meade, said Madison “left the impression on my mind that his creed was not strictly regulated by the Bible.”
ADAMS, in a letter to Jefferson, said, “The question before the human race is, whether the God of Nature shall govern the world by His own laws, or whether priests and kings shall rule it by fictitious miracles?”
FRANKLIN wrote, “Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of sermons preached at Boyle’s Lectures. It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist.”
Ashbel Green, Presbyterian minister and chaplain to Congress during WASHINGTON’s administration, lamented that “while Washington was very deferential to religion and its ceremonies, like nearly all the founders of the Republic, he was not a Christian, but a Deist.”
Had this not been the case, the U.S. would have be just another nation beholden to ancient scripture.
Posted by: walter-in-fallschurch | May 8, 2009 5:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The Words of George Washington : "Thursday next the 20th. Instant, be observed by the Inhabitants of all the english Colonies upon this Continent, as a Day of public Humiliation, Fasting and Prayer; that they may with united Hearts and Voice unfeignedly confess their Sins before God, and supplicate the all wise and merciful disposer of events, to avert the Desolation and Calamities of an unnatural war".
Posted by: US-conscience | May 7, 2009 9:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment
""National Day of Reason." Who could object to a president promoting reason?"
Reason may result in providing practical solutions to global problems, as famine, malnutrition, education, hygiene, access to resources etc. If one is to seek a solution through reason and based on evidence several of our national interests would be compromised. God's will to condemn millions of people to suffering is a much safer way out of solving the problem.
God bless inequality!
Posted by: ZeroTolerance | May 7, 2009 2:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment
prayer09,
i've got no problem with christians declaring a national prayer day (heck, they declare every sunday that). my problem is when they use PUBLIC MONEY to do it.
if interested see my post here (http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/godingovernment/2009/05/not_day_of_prayer_event_for_president_obama.html) quoting james madison on the matter of congressional chaplains.
Posted by: walter-in-fallschurch | May 6, 2009 5:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment
robinlandseadel,
it always amuses me when someone says something like, "they came to america for the freedom to pray and worship".
well, what was wrong with "praying and worshipping" in europe? ah...yes...the problem was other RELIGIOUS people. the only reason we need protections like "freedom of religion" and "separation of church and state" are religious people. freedom of religion is freedom from other RELIGIOUS PEOPLE. atheists don't care what your religion is.
Posted by: walter-in-fallschurch | May 6, 2009 5:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Hmm, the post by DCWCA is a bit baffling. It seems a bit too convenient to always have some way of blaming the other side when it comes to problems in the world. Are you seriously saying that most of the problems in this world are due to people not following God's laws (whatever those laws may be...based on individual interpretation of holy scriptures)? When you say "because most religions thru the millenia have disposed of those laws," does this include Christianity?
Posted by: potatosticks | May 6, 2009 1:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Prayer09: "Attorney Alan Sears put it well when he said: “This nation was founded, settled, and populated by people seeking, first and foremost, the freedom to pray and worship"
Wrong.
This country was founded by people who were attempting to get away from religious nuts telling them how to pray, and other folks who were out to make a buck, including an assortment of criminals and undesirables being shipped out of their homelands and a clutch of slaveholders & slaves. The need to get away from religious intolerance is a dominant theme among settlers to the new world, not some overwhelming desire to prepare the way for James Dobson & his ilk.
Posted by: robinlandseadel | May 6, 2009 1:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Many of these criticisms come from groups that have everything upside down. The National Day of Prayer was proclaimed in 1775 by Gen. George Washington to encourage all religions to promote fasting and prayer in their own ways. There have been 134 national calls for prayer, humiliation, fasting and thanksgiving by the President (1789 to 2008). Nothing prevents Jews, Muslims, etc. from creating their own national prayer committees to contribute to this historic, national observance. Some critics actually go as far as to say that our organization violates separation of church and state by promoting state ceremonies with governors. This might give the impression that government participated in religion and that this violates the First Amendment. Since President Reagan’s 1988 proclamation establishing the first Thursday in May as annual date for the National Day of Prayer established into law by President Truman in 1952 , Christian groups eagerly created national and local prayer committees. Today there are tens of thousands of Christian-oriented events on the 1st Thursday of every May. Jews, however, do not respond in the same way. Virtually no synagogues participate. My research has revealed little to no events in the newspapers or Internet advertising events sponsored by other faiths as well. Instead other faiths demand penetration into Christian groups or else, incredibly, an end of the National Day of Prayer completely.
Attorney Alan Sears put it well when he said: “This nation was founded, settled, and populated by people seeking, first and foremost, the freedom to pray and worship; a government proclamation doesn’t compel anyone to continue that tradition…it merely recognizes a love for God and religious freedom that still pulses in the hearts of most Americans. But when the government simply acknowledges that a religious observance is taking place, and makes it a point to tell everyone in the country they’re invited to join in – and you choose, for reasons of your own, not to participate – and no one shows up at your door to arrest you, or to see that you’re fired, or to summon you to an IRS audit – that’s called “freedom.” http://townhall.com/Columnists/AlanSears/2009/03/18/preying_on_prayer?page=1
Millions of Americans now participate in the National Day of Prayer each year (1st Thursday in May). Last May 1st, tens of thousands of prayer gatherings were held, covering every state. “Day of Prayer” declarations were made from the President of the United States and all 50 governors. Prayer observances were held in 110 federal prisons, YMCAs, national monuments, Indian reservations, military bases, stadiums, nursing homes, airliners crossing our nation, schools, town halls, in the Senate and Congressional chambers of many state capitols, and overseas in Afghanistan and Iraq. In addition to these public activities, people gathered to pray in their homes, churches, and other private places.
Posted by: prayer09 | May 6, 2009 12:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment
>>National Day of Reason.
Human reason?
If so, wouldn't put much hope in that, considering the history of mankind.
When someone truly doesn't understand our origins and reason for being on this earth...wisdom is certainly lacking. God is not the problem. God's laws are certainly not the problem..because most religions thru the millenia have disposed of those laws. That was the basic beginning of our problems.
Posted by: dcwca | May 6, 2009 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter










;-)