Protecting earth a moral duty
Q: The catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is a widening environmental, economic and political crisis. Is it also a moral crisis? How does religion influence our use and abuse of the natural world? Does religion help or harm the environment?
Between 1933 and 2003, three Humanist Manifestos have laid out worldviews. Here is a portion from the latest: "Ethical values are derived from human need and interest as tested by experience. Humanists ground values in human welfare shaped by human circumstances, interests, and concerns and extended to the global ecosystem and beyond."
Is this a religious statement? No. It's from the American Humanist Association, which is not a religious organization. Yet it's also supported by two nontheistic religions--the Society for Humanistic Judaism, and the American Ethical Union. Many secular organizations have long had similar versions, like one of the principles from my humanist group in South Carolina, the Secular Humanists of the Lowcountry: "We want to protect and enhance the earth, to preserve it for future generations, and to avoid inflicting needless suffering on other living beings." I expect many theistic religions could selectively substitute "God" in the Manifesto, and more or less come to the same conclusions.
And what are the conclusions? If we extract natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico or anywhere else we should have proper safeguards to avoid a disaster, always erring on the side of caution. If immediate drilling had been necessary to save many lives, then taking such a risk might have been the moral choice. But a "Drill, baby, drill" manifesto, without thinking through the consequences, speaks more of greed than of morality.
No question that oil improves countless lives with its ability to heat environments, fuel transportation, and transform itself into many other forms, like plastic. Yet oil is not our most precious natural resource. Water is. Every day, children in other countries die because they lack clean water. Ironically, in our lust for oil we often befoul our water. By most worldviews, whether natural or supernatural, such behavior is immoral. But there are exceptions.
Some religions are prone to neglect the earthly present and concentrate, instead, on a heavenly future. Perhaps the most egregious example of this attitude among people in power came from James Watt, former Secretary of the Interior under Ronald Reagan: "We don't have to protect the environment, the Second Coming is at hand." Yet we also need to be wary of the careless use of scientific innovations, without which BP oil would not have had the opportunity to create the damage it did.
Science and religion are tools, neither moral nor immoral. Their shared criterion for human morality is the extent to which humans use them to improve the quality of life for all, here on earth.
By
Herb Silverman
|
June 1, 2010; 4:41 PM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Our complicity and responsibility |
Next: Profaning creation
Posted by: Athena4 | June 7, 2010 4:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment
.
O'Blind "SATANIC-VERSUS" Lovers of ISLAMi Umah!
.
Behold O' ROCK; O' SABRA/iSRAELite NATION!
.
Hear O "KAFiR" Nation;, Help Contain ISLAMi-Scare!
.
LET OUR “A-B-R-A-H-A-M” Religion Go, O' Hijackers!
.
.
________♥
_______♥♥♥
______♥♥♥♥♥
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
_♥♥♥♥♥_____♥♥♥♥♥♥
__♥♥♥♥_____♥♥♥♥♥
_♥♥♥♥♥______♥♥♥♥♥
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
______♥♥♥♥♥
_______♥♥♥
________♥
.
.
DEATH to THEOCRACY in Mid-East & Elsewhere!
.
D-E-A-T-H -- TO "AL TAQIYAH" (Islamic-SPY's)
.
D-E-A-T-H to "WAHHABi'S & AYATOLLAH'S" Monarchy!
.
D-E-A-T-H To TURK Jerks, HAMAS, HEZBOLLAH & CO.!
.
H-E-L-P Stop anti-KURDiSH In Nazi-TURKEY!
.
H-E-L-P Stop anti-ALEVi In KEMAList-TURKEY!
.
H-E-L-P All None-Islamics In Racist TURKEY!!
.
H-E-L-P The AHMADiYYA People In TURKEY too!
.
LEAVE THE SABRAites Alone, O’ Jealous-Islami!
Posted by: shaheed-yahudi | June 6, 2010 5:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Herb Silverman
Your post is right on target. WishI had written it.
Posted by: cecil4 | June 3, 2010 12:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Any religion that posits a hereafter completely separate from this Earth will inevitably denigrate the physical environment of this Earth. Such a religion cannot work as a force to protect the Earth from the greed and chauvinism of human nature.
Posted by: pelicanwatchcb | June 3, 2010 1:33 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I think it's safe to assume Herb was referring to the most precious resource TO people.
I would contend though, that religion isn't inherently amoral. In the foundation of the Abrahamic religions, for instance, there are passages that are clear as day against the common (sense?) standard of ethics. There is only one way to interpret a command of stoning someone to death for a misdemeanor at best.
Posted by: jgpolitico | June 2, 2010 6:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment
1 of 2:
ON: "INNATE-RELIGION" & "IT"s assigned (holy-frequency) "Holyi-#".
REVEALation:: G-D's Particle awareness plus G-D's Number (permeating) awareness, in OUR current Holyi BIOFINITY (Appearance), is a big big deal.
___
NOW: "The British (BP) are coming, the British (BP) are coming..." Well; IF Oil/Gas deposits is Natural-Made; AND Technology is Man-Made; THEN How is INNATE-RELIGION Made?
HiNT: IT was never created not can it ever be destroyed. WE [i] art ALL NATURALLY SELECTtioned; Realizing that fact that YO art not "G-D's Chosen People" anymore.
Note: Religion is not a Science nor can ever be so, but IT (religion Feelings) is an innate Feeling/experience only. And this True-Religion of All religions (please don't be Jealous) have certain Property's (some observed and some not) which are both heart-felt and mind-observable. That's how simple "Religion" is, so don't make IT anymore simpler or anymore complicated than what IT already truly is.
Another HiNT: Natures very own Temperature is the most Holy 'Characteristics' (Observable & Imaginable) of ones current REALITY in both our 9-DiMENsions + holyi-TiME; simultaneously space-forthing US together forever with "SOURCE-1" {a Miracle, not Sin, yet appearing US in Holy Motion), viaa Miracle, Zero biblios SIN/Curse'th factors. So;
We don't need any Man-Made [competing] Religion Systems anymore. Sing, "Goodbye Amon/Zeus/Baal"! Goodbye Moses/Jesus/Muhammads! Goodbye Gautama/Buddhas/Confucius et al!
As Prophecy (if any) Ye surely will be Ye-Selves again, and NOmore under someone-els's MIND/INFLUENCE CONTROL & Pocketbook or as a slave. So their man-made Religion(systems) are dieing or heading the way of the Dinosaur.
Note: The Problem with the "Believer" of the Man-Made; zero Natural-made {innate} System is that such believers of them are still in Denial to selves; or [those 2/3 Awakened] Don't believe in such PRE-Apocalyptarianity anymore yet don't want to spoil a good thing in His/Her Organization for Con Game Activities (having fun playing/manipulating such SuperStupidStitious folks via such old Religions & their naive organized flock of believer).
Posted by: i-me-my | June 2, 2010 5:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment
part 2 of 2
Don't Worry: WE [i]'m Not the Imagined "Anti-THIS or Anti-THAT or Anti-G-D/head. But rather; WE [i] as Evoluting MEME's Always Wins.
Besides Photons; TIME IS OUR BEST MEDICINE. So, MEME's will fix their amazing/plasticit bio-carbon-based Holy-MEME-Brain & Holy-MEME-MIND sometime in the 1st, 2nd or 3rd Generations, starting from Today.
Oh YES! The END IS NEAR, the End is Happily Near! Behold another coming New Beginning via OUR holyi TiME {Temperature Balance, aka Holyi-fixed-Frequency. note: IT's unique frequency with Y-O (like Finger Print) is also likened to a Holy Cosmic given Social-Security # assigned to each Frontal-Lobe}. HiNT: One needs only know this # (Frequency). And The Channel is righteously in front of OUR own Noses. No PRAYER nor NO MEDITATION; can make one see IT'S-LOVE.
Say Goodbye to ALL ABRAHAMIC+ & VEDIC+ Man-Made Religions for profit, NOt prophet or such group-Based Systems. So, No Crying please. No condolences, No anything.
Psst; TRUE-RELIGION IS A LONELY ENCOUNTER, THAT CAN NEVER BE SHARED, YET EXPERIENCED IN ONES INDIVIDUAL LIFE THROUGH CHANCE.
So from now-On: Say, [i]WE have religion already and IT's NOt a "HE" nor a "SHE"; it is only an "IT" being ITSELF in & out of US innately. [WE] are "Born In Miracle", NOt via someone els's Sin story's. NOt via someone els's Ancestral Curses or their story's.
WHEREFORE: SEX IS NOT LOVE. LIFE IS-LOVE! BIRTH is the Stuff of Miracles. Miracles begets Miracles. That's the LAw outside Of & inside your very Nature. IT's that simple. NOTE: This Apocalyptic-Sermon is Free Of Charge.
Posted by: i-me-my | June 2, 2010 5:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The BP oil spill has dominated the news lately as it should. While this spill could have been avoided by taking more safety precautions, it wasn’t. This was not some random accident that couldn’t have been prevented. Pat Robertson isn’t claiming that God hates the Gulf Coast. Where does religion stand in relation to the environment?
Obviously whenever we talk about religion in a general way, we have to realize that there are many religions and many variations within each religion. Christianity for example is split on the issue of environmental morality. On the one side, you have those Christians advocating the Biblical principle of “good stewardship of the Earth” and on the other side you have those Christians who advocate the Biblical principle that God gave man “dominion over the Earth” to “use and subdue it.”
You can read the rest of my response to this topic:
http://bit.ly/93g2Wg
I will be responding to every issue posted in the 'On Faith' section. If you would like to be notified when my new response is up, please subscribe.
Posted by: dangeroustalk | June 2, 2010 3:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Water is not the most precious natural resource. This suggests the problem with materialism.
Life is the most precious natural resource and human life is the most precious resource to humans.
And life is made precious by the value we give it. Without a value for life, all else is inert matter.
The value of life is chosen by the moral system to which one adheres. And if one adheres to a construct that life is random result of inert entities assuming apparently complex forms (when they are really random carrying no other (transcendent perhaps) information), then the value of life is just that of inert matter.
And this brings us back to the importance of human debate, diversity, and unity in promoting life and value of that precious resource. In that spectrum, we can then judge whether this or that action is more or less moral. We can transcend the materialism that is empty of morality.
hariaum
Posted by: Navin1 | June 2, 2010 1:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment
A small but important edit is needed for Herb Silverman's statement: "Science and religion are tools, neither moral nor immoral. Their shared criterion for human morality is the extent to which humans use them to improve the quality of life for all, here on earth."
The shared criterion certainly SHOULD be the quality of earthly life and for many religions this is so - but not for all. Religions that preach that the earth exists for human exploitation ... or that a non-earthly afterlife is more important than human welfare in this one ... are completely inconsistent with the proper aims of scientific research. (They also happen to be at odds with humanist values.)
Posted by: maryellensikes | June 2, 2010 12:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Interesting and on point comment by Professor Silverman about how we tend to foul our water in search of oil. Also, I agree about the problems with James Watt as Secretary of the Interior. Actually the entire Regan policy was a short-sighted consume now, worry about the consequences later. Had we followed the conservation path started by Carter in the 70's, we would be much better off today.
Posted by: jonesm2 | June 2, 2010 10:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter










"Water is not the most precious natural resource. This suggests the problem with materialism. Life is the most precious natural resource and human life is the most precious resource to humans."
Ah, you must work in "Human Resources".
Life is not a resource. It is not tangible. You cannot quantify it.
From Dictionary.com:
1.a source of supply, support, or aid, esp. one that can be readily drawn upon when needed.
2.resources, the collective wealth of a country or its means of producing wealth.
3.Usually, resources. money, or any property that can be converted into money; assets.
4.Often, resources. an available means afforded by the mind or one's personal capabilities: to have resource against loneliness.
5.an action or measure to which one may have recourse in an emergency; expedient.
6.capability in dealing with a situation or in meeting difficulties: a woman of resource.
Without water, we would not be able to live. Period. Try it sometime and see how far you get.