John Bryson Chane
Episcopal Bishop of Washington

John Bryson Chane

Chane is the eighth Episcopal Bishop of Washington, a diocese of 93 congregations and about 45,000 church members in the District of Columbia and Maryland.

 ALL POSTS

How many more will die?

After Saturday's tragic shooting in Tucson, some have pointed the finger at inflammatory political rhetoric.

Many singled out Sarah Palin's now-infamous "Don't Retreat, Instead - RELOAD!" tweet and her 'Crosshairs' campaign map, which included Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords' district, as a sign that some politicians have gone too far in stoking vitriol against their political opponents. (Since the shooting, Palin reportedly emphasized in an email that she "hates violence.") Others reject any connection between the shooter, who does not appear to espouse any coherent ideology, and our current political climate.

What are the ethical and moral implications of incendiary political language?
The shooting on Saturday, January 8th in Tucson that left a federal judge, a 9-year-old girl and four others dead, and a U. S. Congresswoman and 13 others wounded raises the contentious issue of the right of Americans to keep and bear arms.

The Second Amendment of the U. S. Constitution states: "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed"

Last June, the United States Supreme Court ruled that state or local governments could not infringe this right in the name of public safety. This decision applauded by gun rights activists was preceded by a 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller when the high court ruled "that the Second Amendment protects a personal right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes, most notably for self-defense within the home."

Yet some minimal regulation of firearms is necessary if we are to stop automatic weapons from being acquired and used by people who are mentally instable, or have murderous intentions. Our current guns laws are not only weak, but vary from state to state, and do little to keep weapons out of the hands of obviously unstable people. As an example, the Arizona shooter, Jared Lee Loughner legally purchased a Glock 19 semi-automatic pistol at an Arizona sporting goods store even though he had been viewed by the Army, and his community college as a very troubled young man. On YouTube, his postings clearly indicate the same, but because a court had not ruled him mentally ill, he was able to purchase a lethal weapon and then used it to kill.

Arizona's guns laws are some of the weakest in the nation. The state recently repealed its concealed weapons law which required the gun owner to have a permit to carry a concealed weapon. In Arizona, anyone 21 years or older may carry a concealed weapon without a permit. The owner is even permitted to carry a concealed weapon into an establishment that serves alcohol so long as they do not drink, and can carry a weapon on school grounds when picking up a student so long as the gun is not loaded and the owner remains in his or her vehicle.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence rates each state on the strictness of its gun control laws. In 2009 Arizona earned just 2 points out of a possible100. Statistics from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms lists Arizona as a significant exporter of guns seized in crimes committed in other states. In 2009 1,637 guns purchased in Arizona were used in crimes committed elsewhere.

State and Federal firearms laws are so disconnected and inadequate that the Congress must now summon the courage to address amending the Second Amendment to better reflect how that Amendment relates to a society and culture that is quite different from that of 1791 when our nation was still in its infancy. This is politically difficult, but failure to act means more innocents will die in the future due to gun violence.

Virginia Tech, Columbine High School, Tucson, President John F. Kennedy, The Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., Bobby Kennedy, countless law enforcement officers, innocent citizens and disaffected youth in our cities: How many more will die before the Congress of the United States and the highest court in the land stand up to the gun lobby, put aside their political ideologies and differences and exercise the wisdom and courage necessary to address what has become the shame of our great democracy?


The Right Reverend John Bryson Chane D.D.
Episcopal Bishop of Washington

By John Bryson Chane  |  January 10, 2011; 4:24 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: When hate speaks, how much are we supposed to listen? | Next: American idolatry?

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Gun control advocates are as bad as abortion shriekers.

Posted by: aartmann112004 | January 17, 2011 9:11 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Much of the black on black crime results in death by the use of firearms. How do these young men get their guns? Washington, D.C., had gun control policiies in place until the courts struck them down last year.

It is amazing that we want the people in Iraq and Afghanistan to be unarmed except for the security forces. Seems like a double standard to me. It makes no sense that our supposedly Christian nation should not only be armed to the teeth but also be one of the largest sellers of arms in the world. So much for global stability. If we truly believe in God, He is our shield and defender.

The Second Amendment really needs to be looked at and decided closely by the Supreme Court. I personally do not believe that the Second Amendment give any of us a right to bear arms as is interpreted by the gun lobby (NRA) today. We used to have armories and the like where the weapons were stored until needed to fight the Indians and so forth. On the frontier, the pioneers were allowed to have their weapons for hunting as well as for protection. After all, there were no armed militias per se on the frontier.

Posted by: EarlC | January 16, 2011 7:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

These steps are required to own an automatic weapon in the US;

Fully automatic firearms must be taxed and regulated, cannot be imported from outside the United States, and can no longer manufacture and/or register new/existing full auto weapons with the federal government (BATFE).

In order to legally own one, you must first find one that you wish to buy. For it to be legal, it must have been made and registered with the BATFE prior to 19 May 1986. These are what are known as transferrable NFA or Class III items.

Your next step will be to negotiate a price with the buyer. Most buyers have their prices set pretty firm and the going rate for a M16 varies by condition and model (M16A1, A2, AR-15 conversion, etc). A brand new, unfired, factory Colt M16A2 is going to run you about $18,000+ while a used AR-15 conversion will run you about $9,500-$13,000+. You will just have to shop around and look for the best deal out there.

Once you find one and negotiate a price you will need to pay the seller. Depending on if you are buying the item from out of state or not, you may also need to find a local Class III FFL/SOT to handle the transfer. NFA/Class III items CANNOT be shipped or carried across state lines without the proper prior approved paperwork. If buying out of state, you would need to have it transferred to a local seller who would then transfer it to you. Once you have found a FFL/SOT if needed, you will need to pay the seller. Unlike with other firearms where you can often do installment payments for years or put it on a credit card, most NFA sellers want full funds up front although some are willing to work with you and do half now, half when the paperwork comes back. At best, you are looking at half up front before he will even start the paperwork.

Once the seller is satisfied with the payment plan and has his funds, he will begin the paperwork. This requires a little bit of work on your end. You will need to get a few things in order for the process to be complete. You will need to get two sets of fingerprint cards done, two passport photos, and fill out a Form 4 (to include the signature of the CLEO of the area you live in) and write a check to the Department of the Treasury for the $200 transfer tax. It is this special tax that will allow you to legally own the weapon. Once you have all this together along with the required paperwork from the seller, you will ship it all to the BATFE who will then have one of their 10 or so inspectors sit down and review it. Any little error will cause it to be rejected and sent back. This is where the frustration begins as the wait starts. It generally takes anywhere from 50-90 days for them to process an application. The main thing that they will be doing is running an extensive background check on you through the FBI criminal database using all your information as well as your fingerprints.

Once the paperwork finally comes back, the seller can then legally ship/transfer the weapon to you.

Posted by: MrMeaner | January 12, 2011 7:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

volkmare

Let's cut back more and more on care for the mentally ill, and put guns in their hands.

Here is a truth that you need to seek: you have a very hard heart.

Posted by: DanielintheLionsDen | January 11, 2011 11:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

volkmare -

Of course someone who is highly-enough motivated can manage to kill a lot of people somehow, but sensible gun laws can cut down on the carnage. If its harder for someone with schizophrenia to get hold of guns, particularly automatic weapons, how will your Second Amendment rights be curtailed?

How many people do you think is a fair number to be sacrificed each year to your interpretation of the Second Amendment?

Posted by: david6 | January 11, 2011 9:23 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Yeah, yeah, yeah, Mark - "guns don't kill people yada yada ..."

Except, having a Glock 19 semi-automatic pistol with extended clip made it a LOT easier for Jared Loughner to kill so many so quickly. Why does he, or ANY civilian, need such a weapon?

Pointing out the danger automatic weapons pose is not "spreading fear", it is pointing out the reality. And Mark, please, you don't speak for "the people".

Posted by: DROSE1 | January 10, 2011 8:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There is no gun law that could have prevented this event.

Stop spreading fear to promote an agenda that the people dont want.

Mark
Always seek the truth.

Posted by: volkmare | January 10, 2011 7:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Post a Comment




characters remaining

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company