Catholic humiliation in UK
Now that Pope Benedict XVI has returned from the UK, most commentators will surely label the trip a failure, in spite of Vatican characterizations to the contrary. Preceded by a major gaffe by a highly placed cardinal and by rumors that charges would be brought against the pontiff himself, the trip seemed to confirm the depth of negative reactions that Benedict has evoked since his election. To be sure, the trip perhaps did not fulfill the gloomiest forecasts: there was an apparently cordial meeting with the Archbishop of Canterbury and attendance at papal events was greater than had been predicted. But overall, the impression was one of humiliation. Benedict himself acknowledged this humiliation and did so in a surprising and compelling way.
The Pope's arrival in the UK was heralded by a facetious, and leaked, Foreign Office memo suggesting a simultaneous inauguration of a line of "Benedict condoms." Condoms, along with pink mitres, were also fashion accessories for protestors for a gathering near the site of the Benedict's vigil at Hyde Park. American media commentators were no less scathing in their criticism. Lisa Miller argued that the Pope's concern with "arcane" doctrines shows that he's fiddling "while Christianity burns." The image of a Nero-like Pontiff--oblivious, persecutory, and licentious--finds parallel in a number of cyber photo-montages mocking Benedict's papal regalia. Also playing on papal sartorial pretense, Gary Wills wrote that Benedict is "the best dressed liar in the world." Wills went even further by suggesting that the Pope's characterization of cardinal Newman as a defender of papal authority would have led the now deceased cardinal to have called for the pontiff's "demise"--a wish that has been echoed in different contexts throughout the blogosphere. This is the language not just of substantive criticism that seeks to challenge, but of seething anger that seeks to humiliate.
The curious aspect of such protest and commentary is that it does little to persuade those to whom the criticism is directed. It also unwittingly strengthens the two default positions that the Catholic church often maintains in the face of criticism: defensiveness that draws attention to anti-Catholic or secular themes or triumphalism that takes refuge in an image of the church as a "perfect society." However, as his UK journey developed, Pope Benedict decisively broke with this pattern.
During his homily at Westminster Cathedral, Benedict remarked that he hoped the humiliation and shame endured by the church would bring healing to the victims of clerical sexual abuse. In one sense, Benedict was drawing upon classical Catholic atonement theology that connects the experience of suffering with reparation and redemption. But in a more subtle and equally important way, the Holy Father was recognizing the religious significance of the victims' anger.
The pope connected humiliation with shame. Shame, unlike guilt, has an unmistakably communal and public dimension. Acknowledging, and accepting, humiliation and shame seeks to reestablish, and indeed revalue, the relationship between victims and the institution responsible for their abuse. For many Catholics, including myself, this public humiliation of the church has not gone far enough, especially since some complicit or obstructionist bishops still retain their ecclesiastical dignity. Because of this, many Catholics have only been able to express their anger outside the Church in ways that could lead to a destructive fracturing of the Church itself. This is why Benedict's words at Westminster are important: they open a necessary space for taking seriously the humiliating and constructively religious dimensions of anger both within and at the Roman Catholic Church.
By
Mathew N. Schmalz
|
September 20, 2010; 4:27 PM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Comedy saves America: the Stewart and Colbert rallies |
Next: Herb tea party
Posted by: areyousaying | September 22, 2010 9:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment
garylong3 wrote:
However, an aggresivley secular society has been stunned by the relevance of the Pope's message to their lifes, and many traditional Church of England Protestants have heard a message that resonates, and sates a hunger for strong leadership that does not bend in the breeze of a Godless, PC society. I'm sure many of them will make the journey home to Rome.
---------------
As a member of the Anglican Church, married to an English CofE member, I would bet really serious money that you are wrong.
Try to understand: IF WE PROTESTANTS WANTED TO BE CATHOLIC, WE WOULD GET OURSELVES OVER TO THE NEAREST CATHOLIC CHURCH AND ASK TO BE RECEIVED INTO THE CHURCH. We are free to do so. Yet, not one person I have ever known has done so.
We don't want these old men meddling in our lives or our society. We see the mess they made in Ireland. If that is what the Irish want, it's their country and their decision to make. It's NOT what Protestant Britain wants. It's not even what Catholic Britain wants, as they too want to decide for themselves how they live their lives.
In short: We are not interested.
Posted by: darling_ailie | September 22, 2010 8:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I'll repeat what I said on the your other blog. Schmalz your writing is a farce.
You were so eager to proclaim the demise of Catholicism that you wrote a complete falsehood.
And look who you quote:
* Gary Wills--surely not a Brit
* Lisa Miller: an inhabitant of--wait for it!--Washington DC.
Oh yes! these worthies proclaim the visit a failure. Case closed.
I always knew the American elite was out of touch with its own citizens, but to preach the gospel according to Wills & Miller in relation to a trip to Scotland and England shows you're out of touch with the rest of the world as well. It really is rich. You're a joke, you know, you really are.
Posted by: Mary_Cunningham | September 22, 2010 9:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment
It really doesn't matter whether the visit was a success or failure. What matters is whether the pope will actually ACT on his "humiliation and shame." Both are useless emotions unless they are followed by action, and the pope so far has proven that he is incapaple of doing more than just saying pretty words. He is not capable of actually doing anything to attack the horror of sexual abuse by priests and religious. What consequences are there for bishops, cardinals and popes who covered up for sexually predatory priests? (Oh, I forgot, Law is firmly esconced in one of the largest basilicas in the world as his consequence.) What will be done to those priests and religious who have sexually abused thousands of innocent children and vulnerable adults? Words mean nothing. Shame means nothing. Humiliation means nothing if all the pope is going to do about this horror is pray.
Posted by: gabe3 | September 21, 2010 12:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment
"The Pope's visit to UK was a huge success."
I would have to agree. My heavens, there were hundreds of thousands (over the four day visit) cheering the pope, compared to maybe 10 to 20 thousand protesters. Even the political leader of the Tory party, Cameron, praised the pope, acknowledging that he not only raised the spirits of "6 million British Catholics" but the spirits of the whole country. The Labour party people (Brown, Blair, etc.) were happy, too, since they invited the pope earlier.
The crowds were jubilant. Some American students from Notre Dame said that the people were wildly jubilant, many cheering, following his motorcade to Hyde Park where 85 thousand people prayed and sang. It was unbelievable!
BBC covered it. Check it out! By British standards, it was a huge success. Read the TIMES, GUARDIAN, and TELEGRAPH.
Posted by: william27 | September 20, 2010 10:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment
When I read these types of columns I now wonder who and what they are speaking about and to whom they are speaking it. As an ordinary U.S. Catholic, I was outraged that the Cardinals elected Ratzinger. Not knowing much except what CNN and the news media reported I was sure he was the devil. Imagine my surprise by my own reaction to hearing his claim to be a "humble laborer in the vineyard of the Lord" when I saw him on the loggia. His first homily as Pope blew me away. I then read everything online he's written - started at the Cardinal Ratzinger Fan Club aka Pope Benedict XVI Fan Club. From month 2 I realized that the press had created a monster out of the man. I discovered much to my chagrin that most pundits haven't a clue about their own faith let alone the man. And, actually exercise an injustice to him that they, in their self-righteousness, don't see. I for one think that he's terrific and pray that he live a long life. I know countless others who do too because they have seen him and know the same.
And, as was pointed out just in this week's Gospel reading - those trustworthy in small things are trustworthy in big ones - I find I know longer trust the news media to provide me with the truth of a situation. If you are willing to lie or manipulate the truth for an analysis the is pleasing to the subscribers or the shareholders, the truth is always sacrificed. When it comes to the Pope, I always make sure that I read what he actually said. This is easily available all over the WEB and make up my own mind.
Posted by: Mary370 | September 20, 2010 9:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment
As one who attended the Mass at Bellahouston in Scotland, rest assured that the Holy Father's visit has been a huge success! The Catholics of the UK are reinvigorated, and strengthened in their faith, and if that's all that happened, then that would be enough. However, an aggresivley secular society has been stunned by the relevance of the Pope's message to their lifes, and many traditional Church of England Protestants have heard a message that resonates, and sates a hunger for strong leadership that does not bend in the breeze of a Godless, PC society. I'm sure many of them will make the journey home to Rome.
Don't let anyone kid you. The Pope's visit to the UK was a HUGE success.
ADMG
Posted by: garylong3 | September 20, 2010 8:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Twitter










"....he hoped the humiliation and shame endured by the church would bring healing to the victims of clerical sexual abuse"
Apparently "shame endured by the church" is his plea bargain with his small and shallow god of abraham in lieu of turning over his pervert priests to civil authorities.