Video
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Socialism for the rich!
A deal President Obama struck with Republican leaders last week will extend tax cuts across the board including, controversially, to the richest Americans.
Some politicians argue that religious values should be reflected in the public square. Should this faith-based view of politics be applied to the economy? Jesus said, "Whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me."
In a time of economic turmoil and record poverty levels, are tax cuts for the wealthy moral?
In Chapter 70, the Quran invites those who turn away from the truth and hoard [70:17-18] wealth to return to the straight path. The Quran further reminds everyone that in the wealth of each one of us is the share of those who seek a share and for those who are impoverished [70: 24-25].
Distributive justice is an important element of Islam. It is one of its five pillars (Zakat). While Muslim theologians, by and large, have frozen the textual meaning and social scope of the principle of Zakat, by adhering to its definition as a wealth tax applied at the rate of 2.5%. In my understanding Zakat is the principle for redistribution of natural resources in such a way that all beings benefit from God's bounty in an egalitarian and just fashion. In an age when enormous amounts of wealth are generated and an inordinate degree of inequity is simultaneously sustained, I am open to raising the percentage of wealth that can be redistributed.
One of the primary functions of the state is to redistribute resources and benefits to overcome the inequities generated by markets. Taxation is the key instrument for achieving this balance. Therefore while giving tax breaks to the rich during times of surpluses are understandable; doing the same when the society in general is suffering and the economy is reeling is haraam (that which displeases God) and unjust.
It is surprising how, the very people who believe that America is a Christian nation, abandon the spirit of Christian charity and Jesus' love and concern for the oppressed and the impoverished while framing tax policy.
During the current economic crisis in the U.S., we have given over 800 billion dollars in financial relief to rich corporations to save the economy. Now we are giving nearly 900 billion dollars in tax cuts, a significant share of which will go the rich who have already benefitted from state's generosity, to once again save the economy. No matter how the economy fares, in times of surplus and in times of crisis, the state gives wealth to the rich as tax cuts or as bailouts.
In America, we have invented socialism for the rich! The consequences are there for all to see.
I think it is immoral for any society to privilege the well off at the expense of the deprived. Whether it is Prophets like Muhammed and Jesus (peace be upon them) or philosophers like John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin, whoever cared about justice, sought equitable redistribution of resources. Taxing the rich to serve the poor is one way to do that.
By
Muqtedar Khan
|
December 14, 2010; 1:37 PM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Talking faith with President George W. Bush |
Next: Peace, love & Lennon
Posted by: jennas27 | December 17, 2010 8:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Very good response and one that I agree with wholeheartedly.
Posted by: lcarter0311 | December 14, 2010 9:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Only in the U.S.S.A can allowing one to keep a bigger percentage of their own money, be called socialism for the wealthy.
Amazing
Posted by: MrMeaner | December 14, 2010 6:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Very true Muqtedar. In this country the welfare for the rich and large corporations seems to be justified for unknown reasons. The wealthy and powerful, privatize profits, while in contradiction they socialize their failure and risks.
When someone in the poor or middle class goes bankrupt, they take his possessions away. However if you are rich, you get a bail out for your company and get absurd bonuses and parachutes.
Welfare works for the rich. The system is backwards.
Posted by: theAnswerIs42 | December 14, 2010 5:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Unfortunately, there are varying terminologies what is classified as rich. Thus, who exactly is defined as rich?
During the past few years alone numbers have been constantly lowered to include families who where both parents are working to small business owners.
And what about the Senators and Congressmen who claim these "tax cuts are for the rich" while they themselves along with quite a few of the current president's administration would probably be seen as rich. Yet, they are found negligent on their own taxes. But happily receive earmarks for the silliest of projects.
And what about companies and unions tied in so closely to government interests who are bailed out when in trouble?
During the past few years alone numbers have been constantly lowered to include families who where both parents are working to small business owners.