One President Can't Change the World
Like the fight against racism, the fight against extremism is going to take a long time. While tough legislation against those who translate extreme views into criminal activities is necessary, it is the smallest part of any program to combat extremist views.
These days, when we talk about extremism, the first thought that jumps to mind is Muslim extremism. But the fact is that there is a world-wide tendency to extreme views in all religions. Hindu ultra-Nationalists in India, hardcore Jewish Zionists in Israel, and Christian fundamentalists in America all display the same tendency to black and white thought, disdain for other views, and self-satisfied superiority as Muslims who hold to extreme views.
Unfortunately, the most important part of the battle against extremism -- fostering a culture that frowns on bigotry, intolerance, and narrow-mindedness -- is something President-elect Obama has little control over, except in our own country. And, equally unfortunately, it is not the sort of battle that will take two or three years, but rather, two or three decades.
There is little Obama can do to influence the cultural mood of, say, Pakistan. The battle for an open, moderate, tolerant society has to take place within Pakistan. It requires an adjustment of Pakistani school curriculum (which requires a standardization of Pakistani curriculum). It would take Pakistani governmental officials standing up to to tribal jirgas in provinces where now they have little control. It would require a public discussion, and commitment to the rhetoric of moderation and tolerance. It is not a process we in America have much control over.
We can encourage the Pakistani government to take certain steps, but beyond that, it is up to the Pakistani government to implement any program to reduce extremism within their own borders.
So, too, with any dozen other countries where extremism is flourishing, whether it be Muslim or any other sort of religious extremism.
In our own country, Christian fundamentalism is threatening to impose itself in a variety of ways -- from instituting inequality in marriage and adoption laws to threatening science curriculum. We need to have a serious national conversation about the protection of freedom of conscience for our country's minorities. And we need to have a serious discussion about the role of religion in education. I'm glad to see we've moved away from the era when religion was not allowed to be mentioned in public school curriculum, but I am very worried about the attempts to dictate science curriculum, as well as the furor against teaching about certain other religions in public school. In today's world, we would be doing our children a disservice if we do not teach them about a variety of religious belief systems, or if we mix tenets of a particular religious faith in with our science classes.
The other issue we have to deal with is militancy. All too often, extreme religious views become coupled with violence. We see it in Muslim terrorists who believe they are doing God's work. We see it among ideologically motivated settlers in the Israeli occupied territories. We see it in Hindu nationalist rampages, and sectarian or interfaith violence in dozens of countries.
Again, stringent laws against criminal activity are necessary, but equally important is fostering a culture that sees the way to solve problems is through the ballot box and public dialogue, not intimidation and violence.
We can, and should, encourage democracy in other countries -- and that includes supporting democracy when it brings to power people we don't like -- but there is no way we can enforce democracy on other countries. International pressure has proven to be an ineffective tool even for changing policies within a country, even economic boycotts have been useless. And military intervention, as Iraq has proven, only increases the tendency to extremism and militancy. Again, the will to democracy has to come from within, just as the will to teach against extremism has to come from within.
On the flip side, we also need to be consistent and vocal in support of human rights, and the right for all humans to live a decent life. Two of the major factors feeding Muslim militarism today are the political and economic inequality of the world. The fact that vast numbers of people live under horribly oppressive regimes and in terrible living conditions with little or no hope of improvement, gives militants a justification for their militancy -- they believe they are fighting injustice. If we truly want to eliminate militarism, then we have to address the fact that our global economic system is terribly unbalanced, and we need to bring pressure on totalitarian regimes to relinquish power to the ballot box and a parliamentary system.
America preaches that all of humanity is created equal, and that freedom, liberty and justice are fundamental rights of all human beings. When we uphold that ideal in our international dealings, we will help our allies (and even those who are not our allies) in their struggle against militarism and extremism. Unfortunately, all too often, our foreign policy is not based upon ideals, but upon short-sighted self-interest. If we truly believe that freedom and justice are for all, then we need to take the steps required to encourage that around the globe.
By
Pamela K. Taylor
|
December 8, 2008; 6:33 AM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Call on Religious Leaders to Advise |
Next: Stealing Eid
Posted by: marcedward1 | December 9, 2008 2:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Dear Panelist says,*Two of the major factors feeding Muslim militarism today are the political and economic inequality(is there man-woman equality in islam) of the world*(muslims always try to justify islamic terror by sophistry and always accuse someone else except muslims theirselves and their cult)
Lets have a look;
1-*Vast number of people(muslims) live under horrible oppressive regimes*(They live as what they deserve,yes,yes)
A-Why Swedish,German,English,Frenchmen etc are not living under horrible regimes ?
B-Why dont they(oppressed muslims) try to overthrow those regimes ?
C-Islamic Republic Iran,Saudi Arabia etc. are being governed according to islam and shariah/islamic laws,in that case,does it mean *shariah is a horrible oppressive regime?*
D-Do muslims know what Democracy is ? If not,whose guilt is this,muslims or their cult ?
E-Can anyone say *islam is not compatible with Democracy and Contemporary Values ?*
F-If muslims dont know what Democracy is and islam is not compatible with Civilization,who will found/establish Democracy and how in islamic countries ?
2-*in terrible living condition with little or no hope of improvement*
A-Non-muslim africans are worse than muslims.Why Africans do world-wide terror ?
B-If muslims live in Poverty,whose guilt is this ? Switzerland is a mountainous country like Afghanistan.What is the difference between Switzerland and Afghanistan/Pakistan/Egypt ?
C-Australia was a cannibal land at the edge of the world.Anglo-saxon Protestants touched thier hands and Australia became rich and improved country,but Indonesia remained as Indonesia(fourth class country,I dont want to offend Jihadist,so,I dont write much more),what is the difference between Australia and Indonesia ?
D-Can a man who worship five times in a day(although the book says three times) produce any economic values ?
E-Can we say *submission brings Poverty*,if islam brings Poverty/Backwardness/Idleness,whose guilt is this ?
F-The white robed bedouins have huge oil money,but they couldnt found any contemporary order in their own countries,whose mistake is this ?
Briefly,can we say *islam/submission is not compatible with Democracy,Human Rights,Rationality,Civilization,Contemporary Values and Twentyfirst Century*.
Posted by: halozcel1 | December 9, 2008 7:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Farnaz, Farnaz, Farnaz,
Need we reiterate the atrocities listed in the OT/Jewish Scriptures??
The irony is that Islamic terrorists take their guidance from the Worst Book Ever Written aka the koran which was written by scribes who plagiarized from a number of sources to include
the Jewish scriptures/OT/bible.
Posted by: CCNL | December 9, 2008 12:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment
jamil, jamil, jamil,
How very Islamic of you to threaten blog commentators!!!!
Posted by: CCNL | December 9, 2008 12:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Pamela Taylor:
"hardcore Jewish Zionists in Israel"
As you know, essayists are expected to use terms generally familiar or to define terms that are not. However, you are positing an identity that doesn't exist.
There is no such thing as "Zionism"; there are only "Zionisms" (plural). The number of books on Zionisms could easily fill up the WaPo building; in fact, I doubt it could accommodate them, so numerous are the various branches. In a sense, every Jew living in Israel, regardless of his/her politics is a Zionist. In that sense, what you have written is the equivalent of "hardcore atheist American." In other words, to be charitable, I will say you are not making sense.
Further, to be credible and accurate, you would have to distinguish among the extremists you list, that is, after you in some way clarify or rethink what you mean by "hardcore Jewish Zionists in Israel" [sic]. Christian fundamentalists have blown up abortion clinics and committed other acts of violence in the US, but that has not occurred for some time.
To the best of my knowledge they have not targeted minority groups worldwide or slaughtered people with whose governments they disagree.
Jews have neither blown up abortion clinics or set about killing members of other religious groups all over the world. Neither have Hindus.
Now, one thinks of Gavriel, of Rivka, of the six innocent people at Naiman House, especially selected for torture. One thinks of Moshe, Gavriel and Rivka's two-year-old son brought out covered in his mother's blood after having witnessed his parents' slaughter.
And they are just one case. Jews are assaulted by Muslims throughout Europe, in the US, the Middle East, and now in India. There is no equivalent activity on the part of Jews toward Muslims and to imply that there is is false.
You would do better to be less evasive, to begin with recent events, and deal with the different extremisms separately and historically. Lumping them together is evasive, unconvincing. It destroys your credibility.
Posted by: Farnaz2 | December 8, 2008 11:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment
CCNL, Arif, Farnaz and clan
WATCH OUT!!!!!!!!
Iranian revolution throw out its sledge, you can find these infiedls cut/pasting here and there on this forum. Perhaps they are paid for this service.Perhaps their burns are deep and a punishment for them.
You spit on the moon and it will on your face
Posted by: jamil51 | December 8, 2008 7:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I thought you might be interested in this moving post from Shoja, a Kerala Christian, on the slaughter of R. Gavriel, his Rivka who was six months pregnant, in front of their beaten two year old son brought to safety covered in his mother's blood.
s_j_thaikattil :
I wish to offer my heartfelt condolences to all the family and friends of the Indian and non-Indian victims of Mumbai 26/11. May they all find the consolation, strength and support they need to come to terms with their loss and continue with their lives. May all those who are wounded and/or have been traumatized by the incident recover completely.
My special love and condolences to two year old Moshe Holtzberg, orphaned overnight in the terrorist attack but saved miraculously by the protective hand of God that came in the form of his Indian nanny, whose heart piercing cries for his mother are haunting. Jews have lived quiet lives in India for over twenty two CENTURIES (including in my native state of Kerala), without being discriminated against or persecuted by Indians of any religion, caste or creed. The small community of Jews in Mumbai lived among Indian Muslims and had a specially good relationship with them. The fact that a Jewish house in India, which offered accommodation and Kosher food to passing Jews visiting India, was specifically targeted, has left Indians of all religious persuasions shocked beyond belief.
There are many tales of sorrow and courage associated with the Mumbai 26/11 terrorist attack.
May God use this incident of mindless violence bring people of all nations of good will together to protect the innocent and to advance God's righteousness, His mercy and His peace in all places where hate filled ideologies make people blind to their higher purpose and universal calling. I extend my special gratefulness and thanks to the US, UK and Israeli, and my own now home country Australia, governments who have been prompt in their offer of active help and support to India and Indians in their time of confusion and grief. My grateful thanks also to all governments and peoples of various nations who have offered their moral support to India and Indians.
It is a stark reminder that we live in an interdependent world and we all need each other.
Soja John Thaikattil
Sydney, Australia
December 4, 2008 7:24 PM
Posted by: observer12 | December 8, 2008 5:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I'm coming to the opinion that at least for the WA Post it's no use to even put out a more or less fair opinion piece when it comes to Islam. You'll either have liars or crazies responding with half-knowledge or completely unaware of the extreme degree of bias they're injecting in their response. I mean, really, couldn't you [respondents] TRY to present your points in a fair way??? Suffice it to say that this type of mentality in the nation's capital is worth removing for SOME peace.
Posted by: JamieSays | December 8, 2008 4:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Being a convert I understand your desire and zeal to make excuses (defend is very close to be correct verb to use) for Muslim Terrorism more vigorously than people in born in Muslim faith.
Unfortunate rise in Hindu ultra-Nationalists in India was in response to Muslim extremism. Please study History and you will find that Hindus never left their land to conquer other countries. For more than 1000 years Hindus were killed, raped, looted, and converted by force in their own country first by Muslim Invaders, rulers and then colonized and looted by British, Portuguese and French and now they are attacked and killed on a regular basis by Muslim Terrorists.
India perhaps has suffered maximum terrorist attacks in last few years to the point that some Hindus think that it is cowardly if they do not do anything in response. Unfortunately some group response mirrors that of Muslims.
Posted by: ushak | December 8, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Au contraire!!!
BO can start his presidency by promulgating the following about Islam:
Mohammed was an illiterate, womanizing, lust and greed-driven, warmongering, hallucinating Arab, who also had embellishing/hallucinating/ plagiarizing scribal biographers who not only added "angels" and flying chariots to the koran but also a militaristic agenda to support the plundering and looting of the lands of non-believers.
This agenda continues as shown by the massacre at Mumbai, the assassinations of Bhutto and Theo Van Gogh, the conduct of the seven Muslim doctors in the UK, the 9/11 terrorists, the 24/7 Sunni suicide/roadside/market/mosque bombers, the 24/7 Shiite suicide/roadside/market/ mosque bombers, the Islamic bombers of the trains in the UK and Spain, the Bali crazies, the Kenya crazies, the Pakistani “koranics”, the Palestine suicide bombers/rocketeers, the Lebanese nutcases, the Taliban nut jobs, and the Filipino “koranics”.
And who funds this muck and stench of terror? The warmongering, Islamic, Shiite terror and torture theocracy of Iran aka the Third Axis of Evil and also the Sunni "Wannabees" of Saudi Arabia.
Current crises:
The Sunni-Shiite blood feud and the warmongering, womanizing (11 wives), hallucinating founder.
Posted by: CCNL | December 8, 2008 10:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter










Farnaz2 writes
'In a sense, every Jew living in Israel, regardless of his/her politics is a Zionist.'
That'd be true if there weren't Jews in Palestine before the Zionists started showing up.
'I will say you are not making sense.'
Pot, kettle, black.
'And they are just one case. Jews are assaulted by Muslims throughout Europe'
Evidence? Seems like Jews have always done worse under Christian rule than Muslim rule. Not much of a reader are you?