Aren't there better ways to do intelligence work?
Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, will begin holding hearings Thursday on "the extent of the radicalization of American Muslims." Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, has characterized the hearings as "a witch hunt." Are they?
King also has said he believes the "self-radicalization" of American Muslims represents "a very small minority" of the overall community. What are the potential consequences of singling out one religious group?
If the goal of the King hearings is for legislators to better understand the threats of terrorism from within the Muslim community, then the whole thing is misconceived. Presumably members of Congress can draw upon extensive classified information made available through our government's extensive intelligence gathering agencies, without conducting their inquiries in front of TV cameras. We are right to worry, then, that the real purpose is to stir up more Islamophobia. As someone who frequently encounters that kind of anti-Muslim hysteria in conservative circles, I don't want leaders in Washington further fanning the flames!
We can hope, though, that some good purpose will actually be served by these hearings. Representative King has said that he does not want to tar all Muslims with the same brush, and I take that as an encouraging word. If he really wants to perform a significant public service, he can use this occasion to give voice to those Muslim leaders who are eager to work alongside of others to promote the common good in our increasingly pluralistic culture. Many of the folks whom I know who are obsessed with Islamic plots have never seen or heard living, breathing Muslims talk about their commitment to shared American values. I hope and pray that Representative King will surprise all of us by turning these hearings into a positive experience in public education.
By
Richard Mouw
|
March 9, 2011; 8:24 AM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Ash Wednesday: a Catholic coming out day |
Next: A certain people, scattered and dispersed
Posted by: GoldenEagles | March 23, 2011 1:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Rcofield, what is the story that INFALLIBLE scripture tells us about God’s love for you personally? And please explain the reason for your silence on this subject. And please address the implications associated with this interesting scenario, where you appear to harbor, as a Baptist Minister, a belief structure, that is at odds with the central teaching in scripture regarding God's Love.
For example, your statement, “I know enough of my own sinfulness to understand that I could never be a worthy object of the sacrificial death of the spotless Lamb of God. If I were worthy of salvation it would not be exclusively a work of God's grace. (Eph. 2:8-10) I am counted worthy of eternal life exclusively on the ground of Christ's justifying work of redemption.” Appears to directly contradict this key teaching:
John 3:16 - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
This teaching tells us that the Love of God for the people in this world, pre-existed the sacrifice of the Lamb. In other words, the sacrifice of the Lamb, was made possible only because God loved the people of this world. The love came first, the sacrifice came second. If God did not love the people in this world first, there would have been no sacrifice of the Lamb.
For God our Father to have love for the soul, even in the fallen condition, tells us that He sees value in that soul. By definition, to love is to see value. And scripture tells us that God loved the people of this world, and therefore, saw value in the people of this world, so much so, that he would send his son Jesus to bring us home.
When you say, “I am counted worthy of eternal life exclusively on the ground of Christ's justifying work of redemption.” this appears to be in error. You are counted worthy of eternal life, because God loves you, and loved you prior to the mission of Jesus Christ. That is where your worth is, in God’s love for you.
And so, I would repeat my previous statement, “if you accept the premise that it is the desire of God your Father to return you to the full stature of the Divine and Heavenly Identity which was yours before the Fall, and that it is the mission of the Master Jesus Christ to work with you to bring about this reunion with your prior Golden Identity, you can see, then, that one category of dirty garments that must be stripped off and thrown aside, are all ideas and feelings of unworthiness.”
The first step in throwing away the garments of unworthiness is to stop clinging to them, as if they defined who you are. Actually, against this bright backdrop of the Truth of God’s Love, all ideas and feelings of unworthiness are exposed to be patterns of falsehood.
Posted by: GoldenEagles | March 20, 2011 1:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Rcofield, if you please, please give the scriptural references that support your belief that God our Father has no love for you personally.
Posted by: GoldenEagles | March 16, 2011 11:44 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Rcofield says, “I know enough of my own sinfulness to understand that I could never be a worthy object of the sacrificial death of the spotless Lamb of God. If I were worthy of salvation it would not be exlusively a work of God's grace. (Eph. 2:8-10) I am counted worthy of eternal life exlusively on the ground of Christ's justifying work of redemption.”
It sounds to me like you are making a case here that God your Father has no love for you personally. Is that the way you actually feel, that God your Father has no love for you personally?
Do you have a scriptural basis for this belief that God your Father has no love for you personally?
Posted by: GoldenEagles | March 14, 2011 7:27 AM
Report Offensive Comment
GOLDENEAGLES,
Rcofield, if you are so inclined, you can use the WAPO messaging system to let MrMeaner, Peterhuff, Walter-in-Fallschurch, know about the new forum thread.
Thanks for the tip. I'll do that.
...one category of dirty garments that must be stripped off and thrown aside, are all ideas and feelings of unworthiness.
I know enough of my own sinfulness to understand that I could never be a worthy object of the sacrificial death of the spotless Lamb of God.
If I were worthy of salvation it would not be exlusively a work of God's grace. (Eph. 2:8-10)
I am counted worthy of eternal life exlusively on the ground of Christ's justifying work of redemption.
Posted by: RCofield | March 13, 2011 4:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Rcofield, if you are so inclined, you can use the WAPO messaging system to let Psolus know about the new forum thread. (A seperate post for Psolus was required because the forum software allows only three Links per post.)
Posted by: GoldenEagles | March 12, 2011 6:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Rcofield, if you are so inclined, you can use the WAPO messaging system to let MrMeaner, Peterhuff, Walter-in-Fallschurch, know about the new forum thread.
Posted by: GoldenEagles | March 12, 2011 6:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Rcofield, if you accept the premise that it is the desire of God your Father to return you to the full stature of the Divine and Heavenly Identity which was yours before the Fall, and that it is the mission of the Master Jesus Christ to work with you to bring about this reunion with your prior Golden Identity, you can see, then, that one category of dirty garments that must be stripped off and thrown aside, are all ideas and feelings of unworthiness.
Posted by: GoldenEagles | March 11, 2011 2:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment
PETERHUFF, WALTERINFALLSCHURCH, GOLDENEAGLES, MRMEANER,
Hope you find your way here. Let me know if/when you do.
Our old thread:
Posted by: RCofield | March 10, 2011 6:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment
"anti-Muslim hysteria in conservative circles" is shameful. And any Christian who participates in this hysteria is not a mature Christian, but promoting hatred and justifying injustice out of fear.
We should be anti-terrorist, not anti-muslims. Don't forget Timothy McVeigh - he was not a muslim. We have to hate the act, not a vague group of people because they happen to have the same religion.
Posted by: BringYourOwnBags | March 10, 2011 2:40 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Twitter










The Stolen Diamond
Are you going to surrender this falsehood of unworthiness that has a grip upon your heart and mind, Rcofield, and accept the truth, that becaue of the apriori Love of the Father for you, that you have intrinsic worth before God as you are? Actually a very large degree of worth. And it is because of that worth, that Jesus Christ came to save you? Like plucking a diamond out of the hands of those thieves who stole it from the very treasure chest of God so long ago?