Sally Quinn
Washington Post reporter

Sally Quinn

Washington Post journalist and author of several books, Quinn is founder and (with Jon Meacham) co-moderator of On Faith.

 ALL POSTS

Palin's Pregnancy Problem

My first reaction was shock. Then anger. John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman and one who appealed to the Republican's conservative evangelical base. Now, with news that Palin's 17-year-old unmarried daughter is pregnant, McCain's pick may not even find support among "family values" voters.

It has happened before, of course. Geraldine Ferraro was chosen as the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 1984 because she was a woman, but that was 24 years ago. I thought we were past this. Apparently not. McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win an election. It is a political gimmick. And it's very high risk. I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country.

This is nothing against Palin. From what little we know about her, she seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person. She certainly has been successful in her 44 years. But is she ready to be president?

And now we learn the 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is pregnant. She and the father of the child plan to marry. This may be a hard one for the Republican conservative family-values crowd to swallow. Of course, this can happen in any family. But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother.

McCain claims he knew about the pregnancy, and was not at all concerned. Why not? Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil. Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well.

McCain's cynical choice has created a dilemma for many women. For still-angry Hillary Clinton voters, they will have to decide if they want to vote against their concscience and political interests by voting to elect a Republican woman who's even more conservative than McCain.

Evangelical women also will have to decide if they will vote against their conscience by voting to put the mother of young children in a job outside the home that will demand so much of her time and energy.

Southern Baptist leaders like Richard Land and Al Mohler have praised McCain's choice. But these are the same men who support this statement from the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message:

"A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation."

Palin's lack of experience and her family situation are both valid and vital considerations here, especially when she will be running with a 72-year-old presidential candidate who has suffered four bouts of a deadly cancer.

And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?

I don't blame Palin for accepting the position. How could she or anyone turn down such an opportunity? I was once in a similar position. After four years of reporting at the Washington Post, I was chosen by CBS to be the first network anchorwoman in America, to co-anchor their Morning News. I had never been on TV a day in my life. I was 32. There were women at CBS who were much more qualified than I was and certainly other men. They chose me because they wanted a woman. I didn't even want the job, but I didn't feel I could turn it down. Of course it was a disaster. I lasted four months. I wasn't ready for Network TV. Palin isn't ready to be leader of the free world.

The calculation on the part of the McCain people is clear. Palin's candidacy could draw some of the 18-million Hillary Clinton voters who are not happy she lost and who want to vote for a woman on a national ticket. Palin is not of Washington and that will be appealing to some. Most importantly for McCain, Palin is decidedly anti-abortion and that will keep the Republican base under control and appeal to some evangelicals who might be considering Obama. She has a son who is headed to Iraq.

Those are positives for a McCain-Palin ticket, but what about the negatives?

She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy. That fact that she is not of Washington also will be difficult for her. Barbara Bush once told me that her husband had been a congressman, UN ambassador, ambassador to China, and head of the CIA and they thought they were prepared for the vice presidency (under President Reagan). But she said nothing can prepare you for the criticism and scrutiny of being in the White House. Sarah Palin is not prepared for that.

Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job? She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome. Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make? I'm the mother of only one child, a special needs child who is grown now. I know how much of my time and energy I devoted to his care. He always had to be my first priority. Of course women can be good mothers and have careers at the same time. I've done both. Yes, other women in public office have children. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has five children, but she didn't get heavily involved in politics until they were older. A mother's role is different from a father's.

These are dangerous and trying times for the entire world. This is no time to to play gender politics. The stakes are too high. And given McCain's age and history of health issues, the stakes for choosing a qualified vice presidential candidate have never been higher.

Maybe this will work. Maybe McCain will win with Sarah Palin as his running mate. But if he does, it will be for all the wrong reasons.

By Sally Quinn  |  August 29, 2008; 4:03 PM ET  | Category:  Religion & Politics Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Divine Impulses: Barry Lynn | Next: Vodoo Helping to Heal New Orleans

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



"My first reaction was shock. Then anger...This is nothing against Palin...But is she ready to be president?" Quinn is all about opposites, pulling in disagreeing arguments from opposite extremes, where the only unifying point is support for her conclusion that Palin is no good. From shock to anger, from nothing against Palin to having something against Palin, Quinn just doesn't make any sense. It doesn't make sense that Quinn objects to Palin at the bottom of a ticket over her inexperience, given that the top of the other ticket has even less experience. Quinn's mutually incompatible arguments smack of dishonesty. She should just admit that for none of the reasons she's given, she just doesn't like Palin. Quinn is for Obama, probably, as she's a religious reporter, because Obama's spiritual mentor of 20 years, Reverend Wright, rants on a moral wavelength that resonates with her outlook. Quinn should be honest about why she opposes Palin, and then she'll be able to provide reasons that make sense.

Posted by: Sense Ability | September 17, 2008 1:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Bristol Palin is only following her mother's example- Sarah Palin was pregnant before marriage. She eloped August 29th, and had her first child less than 8 months later. Having the child is an honorable, personal decision for Bristol Palin, but it is unfortunate that Sarah Palin was unable to educate her daughter on the importance of abstinence. Presumably, the decision to abstain was not something she could justifyably preach when she had not practiced this herself.

Posted by: Shilpa | September 15, 2008 1:26 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This column is profoundly disappointing to me. "Her first priority must be her children." A man's first priority does not have to be his children?
In the CNN interview Ms. Quinn says we are "beyond the idea that there are no differences between men and women." Of course there are differences and that was never doubted by most people. But over the past 30 years the society has moved in the direction of eliminating artificial restrictions place on the opportunities available to women. If the differences between men and women make women less capable of political leadership, then it is hard to imagine any endeavor from which women could not be similarly restricted.
Men can take care of children and men are taking care of children all over the country.
There are many reasons that one may oppose the election of Sarah Palin to the position of Vice President. That she should be home with the children is not one of them.

Posted by: Joe | September 14, 2008 10:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
Are you so confident in who you are that since
you didnt last 4 months that you hold Palin
to your standard?
Also it amazes me that liberal thinking people
are the first to jump on the fact that a women should stay home and take care of their children as opposed to running for vice president of the United States. Yet( in reality) they are not wanting a pro-life woman candidate for vice-president. Come on!
The question should be. "Should a mother stay home and take care of an unwanted baby or should she get rid of it so she doesnt have to stay home?
The latter would be the easiest way out.!

Posted by: breana | September 14, 2008 5:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am so glad to see another Christian professional woman come to the same conclusions that I have. God Bless You!

Posted by: Pediatrician in Texas | September 12, 2008 8:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Polin was a great choice for VP. She might win the white house if she was running for President.

The problem with the Republicans which I am one, also a disabled veteran who worked to get Bush elected. Bush started a war based on lies and deception, everyone around the world knows this. As a veteran I trust the President or I did in the past.

When a man starts a war, then him and Rumsfelt betrays the fighting men and women of this nation by trying to cut disability benefits. You can not sink any lower. McCain had to know it was a deception, we watched it on TV and knew yet he supported it. A war that thousands killed and disabled for life, a war that destroyed this nation and put thousands out of work.

Now McCain wants to let France build our airforce tankers, it will cost the tax payer billions and crerate thousand of jobs forfrance.

Obama has a bill in the senate that Biden tried to ram rod throught before being asked to be VP. The bill gives ther UN 3/4 of a trillion dollars under the pretence of globel poverty. Bush al ready gives billion. The Obama bill would force us to pay .o7 percent tax to the UN, it would also put us under the UN gun Ban.

If you are not aware of this go to, http://www.dove777.com, you can read it for your self.

As you see we have to pick the lease of two evil.

If McCain continues to ignore America and the American people he will lose the election.

Obama can win by a land slide if he is telling the truth about restoring the economy and this nation.

Oil companys are ripping of the American people and causing great damage to this nation, the democrats refuse to drill, One democrat wants to add another .50 gas tax.

Senator Feinstein from California supports the Obama bill.

This election could make or break America, make sure youknow the facts.

Sincerely, a disappointed veteran!

Posted by: Robert Banton | September 12, 2008 4:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

your just another feminist woman hater. get over it, Sarah Palin has everything you will never have and that is brains and hot legs.

don't be a hater!

Posted by: zolapoyet@yahoo.com | September 12, 2008 10:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

your just another feminist woman hater. get over it, Sarah Palin has everything you will never have and that is brains and hot legs.

don't be a hater!

Posted by: zolapoyet@yahoo.com | September 12, 2008 10:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Just because you couldn't handle being a TV anchorwoman doesn't mean that Sarah Palin can't handle being VP. Going from a writer to being on TV is quite different from going from governor to VP - as a mayor and governor, Sarah Palin is used to leadership. Being an anchorwoman and leading the free world are not quite on the same level.

The same website that says that, "A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband" also indicates that,

"The husband and wife are of equal worth before God, since both are created in God's image. The marriage relationship models the way God relates to His people. He has the God-given responsibility to provide for, to protect, and to lead his family."

So maybe SP's husband should take control of the family while she works on helping run our country. Their family and their daughter's pregnancy and their grandchild-to-be are not all SP's responsibility. If the phone rings at 3am, her husband can answer.

This might not be the time to play gender politics, but doesn't B. Hussein Obama have a family and young children that need looking out for ? What's he going to do at 3am when one of them is sick ?

Posted by: Rachel | September 12, 2008 2:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment

my answer to sally quinns cheap comments about sra palin are nasty and mean, sally quinn's hates any woman who is against abortion, sara and her husband decided not to abort their child simply because he would be born with down symdrome, she and her liberal's only have one agenda hate all conserveratives and ahte any woman who decideds not to have an abortion, they relish in the fact that babies can be murdered, they have no soul or heart for any woman who decides that her family means more than her pleasing the sicko liberals, Mrs Palin cam handle her job and her family, nobody questions any man who has 5 children and a career who is to say that the man can do it better I don't think so for thousands of yeaers women have take care of their families and other duties, in todays world a strong minded and a strong willed woman can do anything she sets her mind to and she sure doesn't have to have the approval of a flunky like sara quinn, try walking in Mrs. palins shoes for 24 hours ms quinn and see if you can handle it, you can't even cary her lipstick. proud to be a woman and mother a working woman and a strong conservative so Ms quinn try being supportive of women who decide to keep their babies and not kill them
linda siler

Posted by: linda siler | September 10, 2008 9:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, I see it's very easy for you to question Palin's experience but ignor Obama's. What is with you liberals. Obama is the guy that voted against making English our official language. This is the guy that wants to divide this country with diversity instead of unity. What is wrong with the language used for our Constitution, our Pledge, our National Anthem, our Laws, etc. Why do we have American/Native American, American/Hispanic American, American/Afro American, etc.? What the hell is wrong with just plain AMERICAN? One country, one flag, one language, "One Nation Under God". Is this the United States of America, or the Divided States of America. The last time I checked, English was the language used in every states charter. Men and women have died so we can continue to speak English instead of German, but Obama can't find the guts to vote for our language or put his hand on his heart. Unity is strength Sally.
Sally, you better check on Palin's experience, status, and position with our national defense team in her own state. How long can silly Sally ignor Obama's experience level at 175 days (Congress in session), and then question Palin's experience. Our kids get more experience in preschool preparation for kindergarden than Obama has for President. Talk about audacity. Thanks to liberals like yourself, many of us will continue to boycot you and send e-mails to every sponsor/advertiser we can find. You approach to fairness is a joke. You have your own agenda, so you stick to it Sally.

Posted by: Ken Corbin | September 10, 2008 8:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Why are you pushing the clock back on woman?

Posted by: sally | September 10, 2008 8:00 AM
Report Offensive Comment

> "Maybe this will work. Maybe McCain will win with Sarah Palin as his running mate. But if he does, it will be for all the wrong reasons."

If they win I hope it will be for all the right reasons.

your judgment about Governor Palin's prepardness her prepardness appear to be tinted by your own political agendas and therefore worthless.

Ms. Palin is a strong woman who lover her country and her family and it appears that she has accepted the circumstances of her pregnant daughter as a challenge to be made the best of rather than a problem.

What fits the definition of "problem" is the entrentched self serving crowd in Washington in which Mr. Obama would too easily find comfort. I certainly hope that John McCain and Sarah Palin can prevent that from happening. That's the right reason.

Posted by: John in Kansas | September 10, 2008 3:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

During Senator Obama's acceptance speech, he specifically stated several times that he was his brothers keeper, but has a half brother in Kenya living in a hut on less than $1 a day. If he won't take care of blood kin, do you really think he will take care of us?? Thank you, but I'll stick with family values and trust Gov Palin to do what's best for her family and our country.

Posted by: ROBERT | September 10, 2008 2:08 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you for coming forth with integrity and truth about our role as woman, wives and mothers.

Sarah is at a cross-road in her life where the roads of self, responsibility and duty meet at the intersection of the brass ring that all its notoriety and financial security.

All woman and men come to this place at some point their lives. Some of us on more than one occasion face a choice to choose "personal principles", over something that is shiny and appealing, however, we have to ask ourselves what are we being asked to pay. Then, there are those moments when its dark and its just you and God, when we have to analysis things and decide to stick with our personal principles and choose the unknown.

We all know that all things are not what they seem when offered, there are bad people without conscious lack character in the pursuant of self gain and use others to get it; then there are the nicely packaged deceptions with a bow with fine print that reads you are my scapegoat; my fall guy, etc.

Then there is the question of "Character".
I want a woman or man in office who I believe has the ability to represent all the peoples of these United States. The rich, the poor, the needy, those with special needs, those of varied religious interests and belief systems and those that don't necessarity have to look like me to represent me.

In Sarah, I am witnessing a person that does not represent the character of the nation founded by our forefathers who built this nation along with its freedoms; nor the people who have fault and achieved their places in a country that was not their own who came to believe that the American dream is for everyone.

I will let my vote speak along with the voices of my ancestors who as slaves and freed people without the right to vote who died to give me the right. So on November 4, 2008, along with many Americans who have achieved this great honor I will vote on what matters, based on principle, not gender or color, on who will represent those who believe in America like me as well as those who do not -- but I will indeed join with a nation echoing the voices of all its people.

I will cast my vote for the leader who "thinks" and "has an agenda" that represents the United States at home overseas.

At the end of the day we are all still woman, men, seniors and children -- "people", with families, on a journey of world peace, a little laughter and a lot of joy, that starts and ends on our personal principles.

I haven't seen this ideal coming from the White House in a long, long time.

Thank you for saying it out loud Sally Quinn so eloquently and in the fasion of a real lady.

Posted by: BBRN,CA | September 9, 2008 8:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just one comment as I am sure a lot of this has been covered. Give me a break regarding the all-consuming job of VP. Does anyone actually think the job of VP is much more than a perfunctionary role. Even if it was a function that demanded a lot of time, I am sure the Palin family can figure out how to manage. I am a father of child with severe disabilities due to a regressive disorder which primarily affects brain cells - slowly taking all life and function from a person. My wife and I manage quite well with our daughters care as do all the persons I know with children who have disabilities. Does it mean we don't get out much alone or do everything we would like to - yes. Does it mean our lives are unmanageable - no. Like most Americans (I hate when politicians use that phrase) we do what we have to in order to have some quality of life and provide the best we can for our children. Also it seems to me the older daughter is getting married and will be setting out on her own journey through life. We all have issues and we all learn to deal with them and balance our lives. To Ms Quinn I simply say get a life! Where is all that liberal gender equality now?

Posted by: Rob, Frederick MD | September 9, 2008 7:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow - so much for the glass ceiling. You've just reinforced that ceiling which Hillary and so many of us women have worked so hard to crack. So are you saying that only women of non-child bearing years have a right to expect equal treatment and have careers? You are a hypocrite! If Ms. Palin had been a Dem + the RNC had made the same comments as you - they would have been labeled chauvinsts.

Posted by: KB | September 9, 2008 5:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY JUST CAN'T UNDERSTAND THAT THEY NEED TO CHANGE THEIR VIEWS TO FIT IN WITH THE TIMES. INSTEAD, WITH THE CHOICE OF SARAH PALIN THEY ARE GOING BACKWARDS. BACKWARDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, EDUCATION, WOMEN'S RIGHTS, ETC. I'M FRIGHTENED.

Posted by: JANET HOWE | September 9, 2008 3:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Most of the time, I agree with you, but in this case, I feel that you are incorrect. I have read that her marriage is a strong one and that her husband has taken the roll of stay-at-home dad and will continue to do that if she is elected VP. I think that although in most cases it is best for a mother to raise her children, the Lord gives special talents/abilities to women and expects them to use them for the betterment of all. Staying home to raise her kids may not be what the Lord wants in her case and she may just be doing exactly as he directs.

My immediate impression of her is that she's not a career-oriented go-getter-at-all-expense type of woman, but a family-first type of woman who has the unique challenge of receiving an enormous opportunity to effect the lives of millions of people in a very positive way. There will be a cost on her family, of course, but having a loving partner who will sacrifice his own career to be at home for the kids is, in my opinion, worth the good she can do for our country and the world (if she is what she appears to be = selfless, a fighter, and good).

Sincerely,

Jason Mount, MD

Posted by: Jason Mount | September 9, 2008 10:17 AM
Report Offensive Comment

you mention mccain's treatment for skin cancer-i have been wondering for a long time about any concern for obama's long history of smoking cancer causing cigarettes (which apparently he still does even though "trying" to quit. in addition, his mother and grandfather both died of cancer.

Posted by: nan fallon | September 8, 2008 5:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

you mention mccain's treatment for skin cancer-i have been wondering for a long time about any concern for obama's long history of smoking cancer causing cigarettes (which apparently he still does even though "trying" to quit. in addition, his mother and grandfather both died of cancer.

Posted by: nan fallon | September 8, 2008 4:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh, Sally, you might better understand what happened to Chris and Keith at NBC. Folks are getting tired of you people always giving your opinion and not reporting. Are you called a "reporter?" If so, report! You are not a policy maker and no one cares who you like and don't like. You are a hateful person. You say you are for women's rights. No way, Sister. You are a OJ: back stabber! Maybe CBS will soon wise up!

Posted by: Don Tedder | September 8, 2008 1:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment


This has been the most exciting Presidential race I have ever experienced. I can’t wait to see how it turns out! Regarding Sarah Palin’s nomination for Vice- President…


To quote and second Dr. Laura’s reaction, “I am stunned.”, but not for the same reason. I am truly stunned by the “feminist” reaction to the news. I first learned of Sally Quinn’s interview on Fox, August 30, 2008, after John McCain and Sarah Palin announced her candidacy for Vice-President. Sally Quinn, feminist extraordinaire of the seventies and eighties, defender of womens’ rights to do anything and be anything that a man can be; writer of uncountable columns and articles denigrating the oppression of and cultural bias against females and equal rights in this country; regular decryer of antiquated attitudes about roles of the sexes, stated in her blog “On Faith” August 29, 2008, “McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win an election. It is a political gimmick. And it's very high risk. I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country.” Cynical? In no way. Calculated? Absolutely. Of course it’s a choice made to try to win an election, as is Biden. Insulting? I am insulted by her knee-jerk reaction, which makes her real agenda remarkably transparent. She is skeptical that Sarah could be focused on the job, considering her five children. Again she states, “Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil.”


As I listened to Sally’s interview defending the blog she had written deriding the nomination, my disbelief turned into something closer to disgust. Unable to simply state that Sarah Palin is a conservative with whom she disagrees politically, (and Sally has rarely agreed with political conservatism that I recall), she pulls out the gender card. (Sally, of all people!!!!!!) She states, “A mother’s role is different than a father’s.” For those of us old enough to remember the old Sally, that statement alone is hilarious. Of course, a mother’s role is different than a father’s, but what does that have to do with this issue?


Let me be clear about this point. I am a mother. I would have been unable to hand over the primary care of my children to another, even a loving, responsible father, for the amount of time that Sarah may be required to do so. I worked most of my children’s growing up years, out of economic necessity. But, if not economically necessary, I would have had to be involved in other pursuits for at least part of the time, as I know that I am here for more purposes than motherhood. However, there are alternative family set-ups that are successful. Mothers and fathers are not interchangeable units, but there are certainly families in which the father is the more hands-on caretaker and the mother is the dragon-slayer. There are also families in which the parenting roles change back and forth over time depending on the family’s situation. As far as we know, the Palins appear to be one of these. How prejudicial for Sally to announce that the Palin family couldn’t possibly handle the family and vice-presidential demands, essentially because Sarah is a woman/mother. There is no denying if Mark Palin were the vice-presidential candidate, his family responsibilities would be a byline story only. The newspaper and magazine articles would show smiling family photos, describe how Sarah had quit her job on the birth of their fifth special-needs child to stay home and quote her stating how proud she is of her vice-presidential nominee husband. NO ONE would be questioning how he could possibly focus on the country, when he was so busy with his own family. How anti-feminist is that? How far do we still have to go on the gender gap?


Many people appear to ignore the fact that for at least the last ten years Sarah Palin has been an extremely busy woman who has already been balancing public and family responsibilities. She is a GOVERNOR, for Pete’s sake. Think she gets to work at 9 after dropping off the kids and picks them up at 3 to take them home and make dinner? Are you kidding me? She will handle her public and private responsibilities as well or as poorly as anyone with a family who holds public office. If the Sally Quinn’s or the Dr. Laura’s were to be heeded (who ever thought that Sally Quinn and Dr. Laura would be on the same side of a gender responsibilities/rights issue????) NO mother, only fathers, could hold public office until their children were grown. Children need and deserve our first priority, but this is never questioned in a male candidate. Was this one of Hillary’s most important attributes to her liberal base, that her daughter has reached adulthood?


I am hoping this is a brief hiccup in our progress to equal opportunity and responsibility regardless of gender. Since this vice-presidential selection took us all by surprise, opinions and positions had not been well thought out yet, and the reactions have been tossed out willy nilly. I am going to believe that most of the working mothers and fathers in this country look at this situation with a smile and a silent cheer. Nearly all of this country’s leaders have been working parents. I am going to give the Palins’ the benefit of the doubt, the same as I have always done for candidates of high public office - that they will manage their family, without my having to pay it any consideration whatsoever. I have faith they are quite capable of taking care of their private responsibilities.


Sadly, Sally’s apparent shadow agenda has come to the front with this event, cloaked in the more politically palatable assertion that she is really considering the children and/or nation.

It appears that she believes that equal rights and opportunities should be de rigeur for women who have liberal political convictions, and conservative women should stick to less demanding jobs (tell that to a woman who works two or three jobs to support her family) until their children are grown. I am confident that she would not have had the same reaction, had Obama chosen a Democrat mother of five for his running mate. Sally would have been her biggest champion.


Posted by: Melissa Sibert | September 8, 2008 12:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Everyone keeps harping on these 5 kids, but no one else seems to have noticed that she only has two children under 14 that are 7 (?) years apart. The older three are or are practically out the door. And she has lots of help. It's probably difficult for people in east coast cities who are either too busy or isolated from their extended families to understand what it is to have a family and community network. If anyone is setting us back, it's the elitest east coast feminists I went to school with (womens college) who only want equality for certain women (i.e. those who think like them). Regarding Andrew Mitchell, she looked like she had sucked on a lemon after Palin's speech the other night.

Posted by: Marge | September 8, 2008 12:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The only "cynical" ideas that come out of this post come from Sally Quinn. She is not upset about that fact that a women can get to the top of the political scene, but rather that a women can get to the top without the help of the feminists. She is implying that if McCain gets elected, that he is going to die or be unable to carry on the duties of the President. As for her quoted comments of Southern Baptist leaders, who says she isn't a helpmate to her husband and who says that she can't be hands on. I detect a bit of jealousy from Mrs. Quinn with her inablitiy to multi-task and be on TV. Don't be intimidated Mrs. Quinn, women are more capable than you give them credit for. And I hope that women do not depend on your "input" to make informed decisions.

Posted by: B. Thrift | September 8, 2008 12:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I wonder if Sally Quinn would still publish the same editorial comment (8/29/08) on Sarah Palin today.

Posted by: Tom Lull | September 8, 2008 11:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I can not even rationalize her pro life stance with her record considering she slashed funding for programs for teen moms (20 %) and special needs children (62 %).

Posted by: Mary | September 8, 2008 6:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I believe Gov. Palin expressed very poor judgment when she chose to fly on commercial flights 14 hours from Texas to Wasilla, Alaska, when she developed very serious pregnancy complications in her seventh month. Her values dictate abstinence? So then, getting pregnant while serving as Governor is allowed? And, getting pregnant again while serving as Vice President or again as President would be allowed? I do not want my President and leader of the free world meeting with heads of state having to excuse herself because of morning sickness. There are now some very complicated lines that need to be considered. As if we don't have enough to do. I, also, am angry at Sen. McCain and I’m not even a Republican.

Posted by: bmw | September 8, 2008 12:31 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a registered Independent and am still not certain about whom I will vote in November.

I have my issues with Obama and have continued to research, read and KEEP AN OPEN MIND.

The same sentiment for McCain.

Palin's introduction into the race has been interesting and gives me more to have to ponder. Woman to woman, I would like to give her serious consideration and I am at this point. I am Pro Choice, so her stance on that issues does present a problem for me. I do also struggle to understand how some seem so "accepting and supportive of her daughter's pregnancy, yet some of the same people were ready to burn Jamie Lynn Spears at the stake.

I am however as I stated, keeping an open mind.

I guess I am a bit confused by some of the posts on here that are so unequivocally for someone, whom most have only seen and heard from once or twice. There seems to be no one on this site, other than hard core Dems who even question whether she is the right person for the job. Why is that? Simply because she is conservative?

I am amongst that small minority that both parties need to win this election, so I guess I am in the cat bird's seat, as I still am in the position of uncertainty.

So please someone who is OPEN MINDED, please tell me why I should pull the lever for the Republicans, seeing as I am middle class,biracial, pro-choice and yes, a mom who is struggling in hard economic times.

Thanks


Posted by: D. Douglas | September 7, 2008 11:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

On the comments section we are asked to "Report Offensive Comments". I am reporting that your column, Ms. Quinn, is entirely offensive. Your hypocrisy is incredible. Your attack on a candidate’s child and the statement that the candidate may not have been a good parent is outrageous. I thought perhaps the conservatives were just bellyaching about unfair treatment but when I read your nonsense myself, I discovered that if anything the case has been understated. Your comments are beyond offensive – they are putrid.

Posted by: William O | September 7, 2008 10:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Thank you, thank you. I know you are a big deal in a couple of zipcodes, but your hatchet job on a 17-year-old girl has generated a backlash in STATE after STATE ! ! ! Please keep it up.

You have started a brushfire.

To impress your beltway friends, you have shown yourself to be vile, vicious, vindictive, venal, vitriolic and self-serving to a fault.

Thank you, thank you. Say hello to Andrea Mitchell. She too has been impressive.

Chuck

Posted by: chuck b | September 7, 2008 10:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

S.Quinn, your 2nd appearance on Fox did nothing to improve your reputation.
You continued to state that Gov. Palin should not be running for such a high level role due to the # of kids she has.
As a professional female, I am appalled at your stance and you are a disgrace to the working women of
America.

Regardless of party, this is a ridiculous stance.
AGAIN, this is 2008 NOT 1958!!

And to all of the leftist liberals commenting, have some balls and list your name.. not just "anonymous"

S. McLeod
Wilmington, NC

Posted by: S. McLeod | September 7, 2008 7:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

NO MORE YEARS!
USA AND PROUD!
OBAMA WILL WIN!
MCCAIN WILL RETREAT!
DEMS WILL RULE!
SARAH WILL BECOME A GRANDMA IN 3, OR IS IT 4 OR 5 MONTHS?


BE THERE FOR THE PARTY FOLKS!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 7, 2008 6:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

SARAH THE SCREEEEEEEEEEEECH PITBULL MAY HAVE SOLIDIFIED THE BASE WHICH UNDOUBTEDLY HAS MCCAIN BY THE BALLS, BUT SHE WILL NOT SWAY THE HILLARY SUPPORTERS NOR THE INDEPENDENTS WHO ARE TRADIONALLY PRO-CHOICE.

NICE TRY FOLKS, BUT NO MORE YEARS

Posted by: Anonymous | September 7, 2008 6:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah may solidify the base which has McCain by the ball, but she will NOT sway the Hillary supporters like myseLF OR the majority of the independents, who typically are PRO-CHOICE.

Nice try folks, but NO MORE YEARS!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 7, 2008 6:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Both John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin are not just talking about improving the way Washington is run but have examples of reducing taxes, fighting earmarks, reducing deficits, and have actually been a leader of the National Guard and the military. That is experience. She is a good choice for all of those reasons in addition to her belief in the right to life.

Posted by: Barb Hail | September 7, 2008 2:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Both John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin are not just talking about improving the way Washington is run but have examples of reducing taxes, fighting earmarks, reducing deficits, and have actually been a leader of the National Guard and the military. That is experience. She is a good choice for all of those reasons in addition to her belief in the right to life.

Posted by: Barb Hail | September 7, 2008 2:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Mrs. Quinn,
You are at the same time being cynical and disingenuous concerning the issues surrounding Mrs. Palin. You are very cynical in that you believe wholeheartedly that she was Mr. McCain's choice for only one reason--that she is a woman. Why do you choose to discredit both Mr. McCain and Mrs. Palin in such an anti-intellectual manner?
Second, how can you raise these questions about Mrs. Palin when you have ignored the same issues about other, more liberal, politicians? This is overtly disingenuous.
The validitly of your commentary has been diminished to the level of being worthless.

Posted by: smiledoc | September 7, 2008 2:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I believe that you are a disgrace to women in America. I just watched you on the late edition of Wolf Blitzer spewing the same talking points as written above. To say that a woman is unable to lead America because of the guilt she must feel for leaving her children is absurd. Would you argue the same theory for Joe Biden, who served in the senate after the mother and caretaker of his children passed away? Or that Senator Obama has two young children to raise with a wife that works for a $350,000 a year job at the University of Chicago? Why don't you keep your eye on the ball and talk about the issues that are important to the American people. Stop trying to distract voters and be a little more objective and a little less irresponsible with your words.

Posted by: Suzy | September 7, 2008 11:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Who let Sally Quinn out of the mail or laundry room?

Posted by: johnlgoff@bellsouth.net | September 7, 2008 10:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn - what a joke you are.

I have NO respect for you, and am not surprised at your instant dislike of Sarah Palin.

This is why most Americans despise the newspaper and television reporters. You have no ethics, are biased and . . . . outrageous male bovine excrement artists.

Posted by: Donna Campbell | September 7, 2008 6:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Please stop thinking that women want you to speak for us. We don't. I speak for a great many women, and we are tired of you thinking we are a bunch of man hating, abortion begging, shrill women. We know when life begins....we know how to keep our legs crossed before we are married and we know our way home after we are married.....Thanks but no thanks Sally...
Sarah rocks, she is one of us, the bed rock women of America.
Donna

Posted by: Donna Tagliaferri | September 6, 2008 11:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I can appreciate that you were willing to go back on O' Reilly and admit you prejudged Palin and YOU WERE WRONG, SALLY.

And thanks, too, for the good laugh. When you said that you as a citizen needed to know if she was going to put her family or her country first because "she can't do it all," you were clearly projecting your own limited abilities on to Palin. YOU, Sally, can't do it all--phony, elitist snobs like you have "the hired help" to make sure you never have to--but it's obvious Palin can do it all, evidenced by the fact that she is. Sarah is an inspiration. Sally, you're NOT!

Posted by: in Aspen | September 6, 2008 9:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I can appreciate that you were willing to go back on O' Reiley and admit you prejudged Palin and YOU WERE WRONG, SALLY.

And thanks, too, for the good laugh. When you said that you as a citizen needed to know if she was going to put her family or her country first because "she can't do it all," you were clearly projecting your own limited abilities on to Palin. You can't do it all--phoney, elitist snobs like you have "the hired help" to make sure you never have to, but it's obvious Palin can do it all, evidenced by the fact that she is. Sarah is an inspiration. Sally, you're NOT!

Posted by: in Aspen | September 6, 2008 9:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Who is Sally Quinn? I've never even heard her name before today after hearing comments she made about Sarah Palin. Get a life lady.

Posted by: Pam | September 6, 2008 4:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a Southern Baptist preacher, I am sorry that you quote my fellow preachers to make a point that they personally disagree with.

"A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation."

What part of "equal to him" do you not understand? And why did you not also include the responsibilities of the husband to love his wife and to give his life for her, even as Christ gave his life for the church?

Ms. Quinn, with all due respect, you are not qualified to comment on my faith.

Posted by: Tim | September 6, 2008 4:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are absolutely despicable in your reaction towards Ms. Palin. You are of the Washington Elite. You and yours ordinarily love the non-traditional family. You love throwing working, unmarried mothers, with 5 children in our faces. This is so remarkably, surprisingly conservative of you to be so concerned over Ms. Palin's family and general welfare. Who the hell are you the mother police now?? Ms. Palin needs to report to you that she is putting her family first before she decides to run for VP? Did you ask that of Nancy Pelosi or any other female Dem with children? Your arrogance is absolutely astounding. I guess you radical liberals really are threatened by our soon to be VP!!

Posted by: Cheryl Lyon | September 6, 2008 3:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you are such an embarrassment, as a journalist, as an American, and as a human being.

Posted by: Tom | September 6, 2008 3:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a complete idiot you are. But....you can be proud. You belong to the mindless in media. Your parents should be so proud.

Posted by: Lon Faison | September 6, 2008 2:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Guess you called another one wrong, eh Sally. Also, the Down Syndrome little boy is 5 months old. Try getting your facts right some of the time.

So, now you're an authority on "faith"! Makes as much sense as most of all that is written in the WP and comes from a similar uninformed perspective.

Like so many of today's pretend journalists who think they can sit down and string some alphabet together any way they choose with nothing to back it up, you do our country a grave and dangerous disservice.

Posted by: Penny Parker | September 6, 2008 2:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

" A mother's role is different from a father's."

Try telling any feminist that one. Your problem with Palin is the fact she is a conservative, plain and simple. And even after covering religion for a while, you really don't get it. An essentially modern pagan covering religion, who has used her marriage to advance herslef, calls someone else unqualified. You have got to be kidding me. Hubris knows no gender.

Posted by: Joe | September 6, 2008 2:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn has been on various news shows this week saying she doesn't think Sarah Palin can handle the pressure and responsibilities of being vice President because she has five children, one with Down Syndrome. Ms. Quinn noted in one piece I saw that she has one child who had disabilities and it was hard. I actually found myself laughing aloud because we have eight sons, two with challenges (1 deaf, the other type1 diabetes since a baby) , and the boys have never held me back. Neither did being a caregiver for my husband until he died. So I got to thinking. Maybe some of us women here in the West where to survive one better be strong all the way around, the women who soar so well, have a genetic make up that makes them do it all well, type people. Or maybe we simply marry better and have better husbands who see us as real equals, and as such are more than 'part time' Fathers who play a the role but don't do the job. I hate to say it but Ms. Quinn is either a snob, or needs to realize that unlike herself, some women are do it all well type women. Ms. Quinn is a pampered media person, a Washington D C insider, who needs to think outside the box. Not all women are like her or the elite liberal bunch.

And having seen Ms. Quinn on Bill O'Reilly where she said she had handled guns years ago, I will also suggest there is a HUGE difference from handling guns years ago and using firearms of all kinds on a regular basis as we hunters here in the West do. That's like someone sharing they baked pies with their Grandmother growing up, but haven't baked a pie since then.

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was a lawyer and working Mom of three sons, and it wasn't until she was well into her seventies when with a husband with Alzheimer's she retired from the bench. But he had had Alzheimer's for years and she still served on the Supreme Court. Perhaps as another wild west cattle ranch woman, she had that gene that makes for special can do it all women.

Maybe thats why Ms. Quinn and those like her end up living in nice areas of cities, while some of us end up choosing to live in some rugged area of the United States.

Posted by: MotherLodeBeth | September 6, 2008 1:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I may not agree with everything Sally has to say, but I am skeptical about the selection of Palin. Skeptical about her being a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Being a pitbull in lipstick, half decent looking is nice, BUT it is clear that what some would like for us to believe about all her experience is overrated. She has done some things but worthy of being the 2nd name on the ticket? Get real. Why has the McCain campaign insulated her from the media and the real questions? Becaus they cant afford a VERY LIKELY gaff. Until recently she didnt even know what the VP did, for goodness sake. If she needs this much of a crash course, she my friends IS NOT READY! Let her come back in 2012, more seasoned, kids older and run against Hillary. NOW IS NOT THE TIME. Remember, ready on DAY ONE? Barack has limited experience but his administration wont be much different from the Bush/Cheney arrangement. Anyone with half a brain knows Cheney ran the White House, not GW. If something happended to Bush, the person who was really in charge would have simply stepped to the plate.

Same would be with Barack. Now on the other hand, if something happened to McCain, I am not comfortable with a smiling hockey mom, having a fork full of moose stew in front of her, kids running amuck and her hand on the button. Just dont. So before we all go hog wild over the very nice woman from AK, lets put our thinking caps on.

In a world crisis, where our President is off doing his job, who is better to hold down the fort? Biden or Palin? If you say Palin, my advice to you is to back away from the kool aid and sober up before November.

Posted by: VA VET | September 6, 2008 12:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally is so wrong.

Posted by: Mom | September 6, 2008 12:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

uxvqkj unixp shqdkuv jfnyi mrbntwoxy nulqbhfj iugpnvy

Posted by: phsjfzdxe svdaq | September 6, 2008 11:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment

uxvqkj unixp shqdkuv jfnyi mrbntwoxy nulqbhfj iugpnvy

Posted by: phsjfzdxe svdaq | September 6, 2008 11:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Please get this NEWS out!!

Does Sarah have 4 or 5 children. We “the people” need a simple fact check! If you want to know the truth about the Sarah Palin pregnancy HOAX, check out this website which has all the links and facts/lies in one place. Give yourself an education and then you can judge for yourself! These are almost all news articles and some simple mental conclusions.

http://www.ourchiropractic.com/sarah-bristol-fake-pregnancy-hoax-links.html

Posted by: glenncz | September 6, 2008 11:07 AM
Report Offensive Comment

SALLY QUINN, YOU WROTE EXACTLY HOW I FELT.THE PICTURE THAT I HAVE OF MRS.PALIN IS ONE WITH THE SAME SORT OF MENTALITY LIKE THE WOMEN OF UTAH!HOMELY.SHE IS NOT READY TO RUN THE US OF A.TRUTH CAUSES CONFRONTATION, AND WHAT YOU HAVE SAID IS THE TRUTH!
ENOUGH ABOUT MCCAIN'S MILITARY RECORD. I RESPECT HIS SERVICE TO THIS COUNTRY, BUT WHAT ABOUT ALL THE SOLDIERS WHO ARE RETURNING HOME MINUS THEIR LIMBS AND HAVE TO BEG ON THE STREETS AND LIVE IN CARS, NOT HAVING THE CARE THAT THEY TRULY DESERVE?NO PSYCHOLOGICAL,EMOTIONAL AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT? MCCAIN HAS ALL THAT AND MORE. I DO NOT WANT TO HEAR ANOTHER WORD ABOUT HIS MILITARY RECORD.IT IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY MIND.

Posted by: Carol A from queens N.Y | September 6, 2008 11:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Saw you on O'Reilly last night and was happy to see you trying to water down your ridiculous article.

Funny thing though, that same morning when you were on CNN with Kiran Chetry you hadn't changed your mind yet. So.... what happened?

Did you get a tap on your door from the boss that said something like this, "Sally you better get your head out of the sand and make peace with the ladies"?

BTW - Your constant blinking on O'Reilly told all the viewers what a phony you really are.

Posted by: Sara Michaels | September 6, 2008 10:07 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Shame on Sally for such a diatribe. I just ignored her publicized opinion at first but when I saw it time after time on various shows I thought it is time to say something. She obviously thinkS she has something worthy and of value to say. Sally is quite frankly a pompous and ignorant A$$ to think that she could credulously transfer her abilities onto the Palin family. What she should be saying is that "Being the mother of 5 and the VP would be impossible for ME". I truly think that the Palin family is a unique family that possesses the qualities of tough mental fortitude, stamina, drive, etc. Those are required qualities to win that 2000 mile snow mobiling race that Todd Palin has won 4 times!! Sally, you probably couldn't even dream of competing in that race but Todd Palin won it 4 times. To him, it wasn't impossible. Obviously Sarah has those winning qualities too. Cream rises and both of them have been extremely successful in their endeavors.
Also, to say that perhaps she wasn't a "hands on enough" mother because her daughter was pregnant. Sally, are you saying to the millions of women who have had teenage daughters that got pregnant, that they may not have been hands on enough? Are you seriously saying that teen age children would not get pregnant if their parents were more engaged?!! If that is your stance,honey, you are foolish. News flash, even great parents can have this happen.
If you really want to get right down to the meat and potatoes of teenage pregnancy, why dont' you examine the affects of all of the acceptable and mainstream sexuality on TV these days, which can be factually said to be a product of the "left wing" elite in the TV & movie business. When teenagers see show after show of blatant sexual talk and action, it becomes "normal" and "acceptable". But this isn't a response to that...I am blown away by your judgement of a woman who has risen to the top of all she does and yet and still you want to limit her. By saying that she couldn't possibly be a good mother to 5 kids (one with down syndrome and a pregnant 17 year old)is an affront to all of the hands on fathers of the world. In this case, an insult to Todd Palin.
Let's just call a spade a spade Sally and admit it. YOU wouldn't be able to do what Sarah Palin does....but YOU aren't Sarah Palin. Put your ignorance to rest. Those who have achieved greatness, many times, do it in spite of the naysayers and doubters. YOU are one of those naysayers and doubters. YOU are one of the ordinary. GO SARAH GO!!!

Posted by: Jackie Cunningham | September 6, 2008 9:43 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms.Quinn,I watched you on Fox News and agree with your statement that Women should rule the world and will very soon rule and be in charge.

Posted by: James | September 6, 2008 6:26 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You are a great thinker, writer and teacher. And I prayerfully pray that the Unwashed will one day, appreciate your intelligence for the greatness that it is. Please, for the sake of Humanity, have your Attorney (Levin Bred) insist on a clause in your next contract with the Proust, which demands that all of your writings be etched into the tripe of a fatted calf, sealed in a mayonnaise jar and locked in the vault of the famed archivist firm: Dewey Cheetum & Ho.

Posted by: St.Paul | September 6, 2008 12:44 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn - Your viewpoints of Gov. Palin are blatantly anti-suffragette. Have you forgotten that, during WWII, with so many men overseas, women had to fulfill duties to country and home by WORKING in factories and raising their children on their own or with the support of their other children? Are you simply transferring your own weaknesses onto Gov. Palin? For goodness sake woman, Kings and Queens and other monarch types haven't had to stay at home to tend to children....Please reconsider your myopic viewpoints.

Posted by: lobokitch | September 5, 2008 11:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maybe I missed the response, but I have taken the liberty of reposting someone else's post.


RESPONSE??

ANYBODY???

Pav

Since the selection of Sarah Palin religious conservatives have done a 180 on the primacy of mothers staying home. The same people who for decades condemened mothers who worked outside the home -unless they were on the verge of being homeless (these arguments are a luxury for poor and working class mothers)- are now endorsing a mother with small children and an infant- to the second highest office in the land. Religious conservatives would encourage single mothers (or even married couples) with children to move back in with relatives if that was what was necessary to keep the mother home with their children and out of the workforce. Married parents were encouraged to live on one salary so the mother could stay home. Parents were told they should make whatever financial sacrifices were necessary to keep mothers home - vacations, second car, new cloths, dinning out, cable tv, home gardens and bartering for goods and services to reduce the need for cash. Biblical arguments were made for mothers staying home;societal arguments; financial arguments- the sum of the costs of second car, insurance, wardrobe, daycare, higher taxes ect.. might equal or exceed the second income. Fathers working overtime and second and even third jobs is what you do if necessary. Only in the most dire circumstances were mothers grudgingly not considered selfish for not staying home. If financially strapped families are expected to follow this model what's the justification for it not applying to Palin? Mothers were also encouraged to stay out of the workforce since it "hardened" them; a mother who took abuse from a boss all day is stressed out and not going to be the nurturing caregiver when she goes home to her husband and kids- so says James Dobson. Military service for current or future moms is even worse- how can someone who has been trained to kill be the nurturing caregiver of life? Where are these past arguments now? How are Christian families going to have the man as head of the household if his wife is the breadwinner?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 5, 2008 11:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
With your hate-filled attack on women, I expect that you will resign from your job, whip up a dinner for me every night promptly at 6PM, clean the dishes afterwards, and ensure my house is spotless. You will serve breakfast at 7AM and carry out my every whim and desire. I would expect you to perform your womanly duties but, you know, you're old so I'll let you off the hook. Since I am a man, you will recognize that I am your superior and you are a second-class citizen.

Is this really what you want to achieve with your misogynist rant? You meant to question Palin's fitness but the person who was really revealed as incompetent is you.

Posted by: Mustafa | September 5, 2008 11:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you so much for expressing much of what I have been feeling. I think a mother of five can certainly work...don't see how that is an issue...but I also think she sacrificed her eldest daughter to the media. Of course, I disagree with her on issues (disagree with McCain too) so she wouldn't get my vote no matter what.

Posted by: Pam Green | September 5, 2008 11:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you so much for expressing much of what I have been feeling. I think a mother of five can certainly work...don't see how that is an issue...but I also think she sacrificed her eldest daughter to the media. Of course, I disagree with her on issues (disagree with McCain too) so she wouldn't get my vote no matter what.

Posted by: Pam Green | September 5, 2008 11:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you so much for expressing much of what I have been feeling. I think a mother of five can certainly work...don't see how that is an issue...but I also think she sacrificed her eldest daughter to the media. Of course, I disagree with her on issues (disagree with McCain too) so she wouldn't get my vote no matter what.

Posted by: Pam Green | September 5, 2008 11:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin sold her child on ebay.

Posted by: lol | September 5, 2008 11:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Cant compare Pelosi to Palin and I am NO fan of Pelosi-

Nancy "was pregnant for a good portion of the 1960s", having five kids, born in six years and one week.
Source: Cbsnews.com

Nancy was a stay-at-home mom while raising their five children. She was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1987 and elected to serve as the first female Speaker of the House in January 2007.

Kids born in the 60s, Mom to Congress in 1987.

You do the math.

Posted by: SpokenTruth | September 5, 2008 11:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Has anyone ever questioned Speaker Nancy Pelosi's not putting her children first, her 5 children, over her career in politics? I thought not.

Posted by: Cathryn | September 5, 2008 10:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Respectfully Ms Quinn...? In Regards To Your Appearance On The OReilly Factor. You Really Should Find Out About Things, BEFORE You Offer “Your Learned’ Opinions. Once Again You Have Spoken Too Quickly. This Time Re: Mrs. Palin & Her Lack Of Understanding Re: Time & Special Needs Children. As I Myself Learned On Day Three Of The RNC, Sara’s Sister Has A Special Needs Child That Is Around 13 That Mrs. Palin Is MORE Than Familiar With.
I Expect…? That Many End Up On Your Site Looking For Information. Wouldn’t It Be Nice…?If They Left Your Site Well Informed? Rather Than…? Ohhh… I Don’t Know? Filled With Gossipy, Opinionated, Tabloid Style Innuendo.

I Came Across Your “Previous Opinion” Soon After You Made The Verbal Mistake That It Was. Sad…
I Thought The Newsweek/Washingtonpost Was A LEGITIMATE News Organization.

Take Heart That Sarah… Is Most Likely Not Bothered The Least By The Treatment. Sarah’s Own Words Re: Some Of Hillary Clintons Past Complaints Suggests That Reasoning.
The Mothers & Fathers, Of Millions Of Daughters Though..? Most Certainly Are.

Be “Old School” Ms. Quinn! If You Think Before You Speak…? You Should Be Satisfied With The Person You See In The Mirror Every Morning. We Can Only Hope…
=^_^= I Hope Next Week Goes Better For You.
(Leif... Pronounced “Life”)

Posted by: Leif From Fairbanks, Alaska | September 5, 2008 9:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I saw you on O'Reilly and laughed out loud when you mentioned George Romney as a better choice for McCain's vice presidential running mate. You are showing your age. George's son, Mitt was who you meant.
P.S. You should not have received Communion at Tim Russert's funeral. As a Catholic, I know you had no right to do that. It just tells all about your arrogance and lack of understanding of ordinary people.

Posted by: Jeanne McCabe | September 5, 2008 9:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"This is no time to to play gender politics."

Which of course is why this column is dedicated to doing exactly that. You are a transparent weasel.

Posted by: PA | September 5, 2008 9:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Att: Sally Quinn

I am outraged by the sinful comments you have made of Sarah Palin What unacceptable statements. Nursing a child? I think people of poor character during this race will go nuts, after all going to such a low level to talk about a female because she has kids the way you have is sad. Sarah Palin's son is defending my USA my USA so I guess if she put her kids 1st he would not be signed up. Do you have kids in arms way?
Are you saying men don't love their kids as much as women? Faith! You must be kidding. Are you one of those people to use Religion to make money? Don't worry someone else knows the answer. Cynthia


Posted by: Cynthia Denman | September 5, 2008 9:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Since the selection of Sarah Palin religious conservatives have done a 180 on the primacy of mothers staying home. The same people who for decades condemened mothers who worked outside the home -unless they were on the verge of being homeless (these arguments are a luxury for poor and working class mothers)- are now endorsing a mother with small children and an infant- to the second highest office in the land. Religious conservatives would encourage single mothers (or even married couples) with children to move back in with relatives if that was what was necessary to keep the mother home with their children and out of the workforce. Married parents were encouraged to live on one salary so the mother could stay home. Parents were told they should make whatever financial sacrifices were necessary to keep mothers home - vacations, second car, new cloths, dinning out, cable tv, home gardens and bartering for goods and services to reduce the need for cash. Biblical arguments were made for mothers staying home;societal arguments; financial arguments- the sum of the costs of second car, insurance, wardrobe, daycare, higher taxes ect.. might equal or exceed the second income. Fathers working overtime and second and even third jobs is what you do if necessary. Only in the most dire circumstances were mothers grudgingly not considered selfish for not staying home. If financially strapped families are expected to follow this model what's the justification for it not applying to Palin? Mothers were also encouraged to stay out of the workforce since it "hardened" them; a mother who took abuse from a boss all day is stressed out and not going to be the nurturing caregiver when she goes home to her husband and kids- so says James Dobson. Military service for current or future moms is even worse- how can someone who has been trained to kill be the nurturing caregiver of life? Where are these past arguments now? How are Christian families going to have the man as head of the household if his wife is the breadwinner?

Posted by: Pav | September 5, 2008 9:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How do I get to the comments?

Posted by: marty@historicrealestate.com | September 5, 2008 8:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, Nice Back-Pedaling on O'Reilly. How about picking a side of the fence and staying there.

Posted by: June Forest | September 5, 2008 8:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why can't I pull up the comments?

Posted by: Marty Byrd | September 5, 2008 8:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I saw your interview with Bill O'Reilly and I agree with you 100%. I am a 66 year old mother of 2, grandmother of 5- 4 of them pre-schoolers. I was a teacher and was fortunate to be able to have the same holidays as my sons and most days saw them off to school and was home when they arrived. Now I look after my grandchildren while my daughters-in-law work-one,part-time, the other a teacher like me. Too quickly go the years when your children are young and you can miss so much.
Second,Bristol is marked for life as the pregnant,unmarried teen of the v.p candidate. The whole world knows her situation and will follow with morbid curiosity her life, even if her mother is not elected. Good luck to them all.

Posted by: Barbara Pettigrew | September 5, 2008 8:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am glad you have decided to give Gov. Palin a chance.

Believe me, All my friends are just THRILLED with the idea of McCain/Palin. McCain could not have picked a better person.

I cannot believe the women liber's reaction. Who do they think they are fooling. We may live in the south, but believe me, we didn't fall off the turnip truck!!

Just a loving grandmother in Jacksonville Florida

Posted by: jean parrish | September 5, 2008 8:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am very concerned about the arguements you have made here. I believe that there are valid reasons
with her lack of experience being the most significant. I have 2 adult daughters and the idea that today there are intelligent people like you saying that neither could become a CEO of a large company, or an attorney in a high pressure job because they have children is, to me, a very sexist and degrading remark.
It is quite in keeping with the former idea that women would not be promoted because they have children, or may have children. This belief, now illegal but probably still practiced to some extent today, is just as ridiculous when the VP job is involved. Men today, certainly a minority but a growing number of men are very willing and able to take over the responsibilities of caring for the children. Or are men not supposed to do that because they are genetically unable to do so?

Posted by: Tony | September 5, 2008 8:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Lighten Up America. Take a moment to laugh

http://www.youtube.com/SaraBenincasa

Posted by: LightheartedLassy | September 5, 2008 6:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Keep up the attack, Sally. The more you attack, the more will vote for McCain-Palin!!! People's eyes are being opened to your viciousness!

Posted by: Jude | September 5, 2008 6:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn's commentary about Sarah Palin and her family is SO SEXIST I would think it was written by a man. How many mothers who are totally involved in their children's lives have seen a child become pregnant? Even a so-called "good mother" can't be with a child 24 hours a day. You just pray they will make the right decision at the right time. After all, isn't this the 21st century and don't all the "left-wing" liberals believe in letting children run the show? Who gave Sally Quinn, a mere "woman" a job as a journalist? Did the magazine need a token woman?

Sally, you owe Mrs. Palin and all other women in this country a BIG apology.....

Shirley Gorman
Sun City, AZ

Posted by: Shirley Gorman | September 5, 2008 5:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
I followed your career. Your right. You were not ready for prime time @32 years of age. You still aren't today. I wish Ben would take away the pen he gave you long ago. The American Mom has grown a lot stronger since yours and I'm not surprised you wouldn't notice the difference.Sarah will do just fine. Relax Sally, you have been irrelevent for years. You don't need to remind us why !

Posted by: James M Irving | September 5, 2008 4:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Judy Martin,

As a man I take offense that you believe I could not tend to the special needs of my son while my wife assumes important responsibilities out side of the home. You have no basis to intrude upon Todd Palin's willingness and desire to meet that need. Your comments are not only sexist against women but also against males who lovingly and willingly decide to meet their children’s needs as a partner with their wives and the father of their children. Your stereotypical and sexist comments are not appreciated. So---no---Sally Quinn doesn’t get it and neither do you.

Posted by: Eric | September 5, 2008 1:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh Please Ladies... Give the Husband/Dad a little credit. Men are just as capable of caring and loving their children as women. Maybe Todd Palin would be the better caregiver, gasp!

Posted by: Steve | September 5, 2008 12:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I couldn't agree more with Sally Quinn. I definitely believe that a mother's responsibility with a special needs child is to be with that child and tend to it's special needs and not traveling all over the U.S. trying to win the position of V.P. I definitely believe Sarah's priorities are in the wrong order. I also shudder to think of her running the country if McCain wins and then dies. Sally's last sentence stating that if McCain and Sarah win the election, it will be for all the wrong reasons is right on.

Posted by: Judy Martin | September 5, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,

I'm sure all your women readers agree we should keep women barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen. After all isn't that what progressive women have been fighting to achieve for the last 40 years?

So you think a women’s family will be …. “an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil” but would not be a distraction for a man?

Just listen to yourself ----

--- “Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job? She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome.”

--- “A mother's role is different from a father's.”

Your message to women with young children is STAY HOME WHERE YOU BELONG.

No one would ask if a male candidate was qualified for office because his family commitments. You would think only male chauvinistic pigs would ask such questions. But no - - it’s a liberal democratic woman. Isn’t Gov. Palin the epitome of the liberated women? What ever happened to the Virginia Slims slogan “You’ve come a long way?” You would prefer to send women, at least conservative women, back to the Stone Ages for men to drag around by their hair.

Four you Sally Quinn, the truth is not a constant, at least when it’s your political ox that’s getting gored. Keep it up….it will just give the McCain-Palin ticket more votes. You are so transparent.

Posted by: eric | September 5, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,

I'm sure all your women readers agree we should keep women barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen. After all isn't that what progressive women have been fighting to achieve for the last 40 years?

So you think a women’s family will be …. “an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil” but would not be a distraction for a man?

Just listen to yourself ----

--- “Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job? She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome.”

--- “A mother's role is different from a father's.”

Your message to women with young children is STAY HOME WHERE YOU BELONG.

No one would ask if a male candidate was qualified for office because his family commitments. You would think only male chauvinistic pigs would ask such questions. But no - - it’s a liberal democratic women. Isn’t Gov. Palin the epitome of the liberated women? What ever happened to the Virginia Slims slogan “You’ve come a long way?” You would prefer to send women, at least conservative women, back to the Stone Ages for men to drag around by their hair.

Four you Sally Quinn, the truth is not a constant, at least when it’s your political ox that’s getting gored. Keep it up….it will just give the McCain-Palin ticket more votes. You are so transparent.

Posted by: eric | September 5, 2008 11:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey Sally!

So could you provide us with a list of jobs that women who are mothers can have oh wise and omnipotent one?

How about explaining to Katie Couric why she should have never taken the anchor position with CBS as she is a single mother and could not possibly be taking care of her children as she should according to you.

Sally - you are proof - as is Obama that just because you have an college degree doesn't qualify you as intelligent. In fact it shows just how badly you got ripped off in your quest for smarts.

Thanks for setting women back 50 years oh bright one.

Posted by: Nunya | September 5, 2008 10:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, Sally, Sally,I don't know whether to laugh, cry or throw up after reading your toxic nonsense. I guess we've come to the conclusion in our country that women can not play a role in leading this country because parenting is their main responsibility. Sarah is not a single mother, she has a husband that will work with her on the home front.
Now for the appearance of a double standard. Let's see, as I recall Robert Kennedy was the father of 11 children. What was he thinking when he ran for President! How dare he leave his wife at home to care for all those children.

Posted by: Katherine | September 5, 2008 10:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with you. Your writting makes a lot of sense.

Posted by: Rob | September 5, 2008 9:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment


JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ

Posted by: Massguy | September 5, 2008 9:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment


You are the and your elite martini crowd are the exact reason John and Sarah will win this election. They are real people with real values who care about womens rights, even if the women is a conservative, unlike yourself who only cares about a womens rights if the women is a left wing liberal.

Posted by: Massguy | September 5, 2008 9:34 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, Why is it that you would not support another woman that has shown the amazing ability to balance Family, Personal Achievement and Happiness?

I can't help but point out that your article has a tone of jealousy. Instead of comparing your own life and career struggles, maybe, try to see beyond yourself and give Sarah Palin the support and credit she deserves. She is a terrific role model for her children, and has given all women a reason to walk taller today.

Posted by: Joan Riley | September 5, 2008 9:26 AM
Report Offensive Comment

As a professional woman with children I am appalled by your unbelievably ridiculous argument that a woman cannot do this job if she has five children. ( or even one or a baby or is breastfeeding etc..)it is simply not fair and not the relevant issue. The professional women I know bring an incredible amount of personal empathy and experience that comes from working and raising a family. I admire them. I would never want to be judged unfit to do my job because I chose to have a family.

Posted by: apple | September 5, 2008 8:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn set's a whole new standard for sexism. She has set the clock back 50 years with her ignorant statements regarding who loves their country more, men or women? Sally needs to pull her head out and walk through the door of the 21st century.

Posted by: Janeece | September 5, 2008 7:57 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Get a grip Sally. You have got your priorities wrong. For the first time in history, we have a very smart, savvy woman in the running for vp. Get off her back, how can you NOT support someone from your own sex who was born to lead...obviously? I am an ex Democrat/pro-choice woman, who has the utmost respect for Sarah Palin, and am married to a man who has been an extraordinary father, and it seems as if, if you haven't noticed, Todd Palin and Sarah Palin are wonderful parents, with a great family. So, fyi, single for 39 yrs, Democrat most of my life,she AND the running mate for President, John MacCain have my vote. And for the first time ever, I made a donation to the RNC

Posted by: Barb von Netzer | September 5, 2008 7:56 AM
Report Offensive Comment

A mean-spirited article. Ms Quinn, how do you want to be remembered? A writer with no integrity? A writer with worthless legacy?

Posted by: Irek Janus | September 5, 2008 6:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, so if I understand you correctly, because Gov. Palin has children she my not be able to do her job if the phone rings at 3:00am. If that were the case, how did she run the large state of Alaska (while pregnant even) and maintain an over 80% approval rating. To say you know little about her amazes me. I found out more about her in a few short minutes than I have about Obama in the almost 2 years of his campaign. What I have learned is not pretty. He wants change. He will be the president of change if elected. Change to a socialist society. He has no experience whatsoever. Even Biden himself said he lacks the experience to be president. Oh, that was when Biden was for Hillary. Now, I guess, Obama got experience. Oabama hangs with the lowest of the low and how smart is a man who sat in a church for 20 years and claims he had no clue that Mr. (he doesn't deserve the title of Rev.) Wright was an angry, angry black man who hates white people. By the way how did Biden hold his position, being a single dad, taking the train for hours a day, and not a single dem or rep questioned his ability to do that. Obama has no experience and for the hundred and some odd days he spent in the senate he accomplished nothing. He spent 4 years in a muslim school and personally I find him a very scary individual. We are now living in a great country with the media controlled by liberals. Oh yes, we do have our talk radio that the liberal dem are trying to shut down. Maybe you should listen to Gov Palin. You could learn a lot from her. It may even take some of the venom out of your fangs. Maybe you and your party are walking on egg shells and fear you will find Obamo lost come Nov. It is amazing with all the lies and unbalanced reporting from the media and people like you that the Rep stand a chance. With all the negative reporting concerning the rep and all the hype you give the likes of Obama won't you feel foolish in Nov when the rep win the race of the century and we have a female a heartbeat away from becoming commander in chief. Can you list any accomplishments of Obama as he is getting desprate and added running his campaign to his resume.

Posted by: Jane Clemens | September 5, 2008 12:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Having spent 30 years working for women's equality

I am shocked and disgusted that someone in your position to do so much good has chosen instead to

be stereotypically mean and catty and spiteful

toward another public woman - GOV. Sarah Palin.

How dare you tell someone she has too many children.
You would NEVER say that to a male.
How disgusting! Shame on you. You have shown yourself to be a little woman a silly woman>

Shame Shame Shame. You know better.

Professor Helen McCaffrey

Posted by: Prof.Helen McCaffrey | September 4, 2008 9:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why is Sally Quinn so angry at Sarah Palin?

Could it be because Sarah Palin achieved her position through hard work that earned the trust of
people in flyover country? Perhaps Ms Quinn would be happier if Sarah Palin got ahead using the Sally Quinn method -- marrying a big shot.

Posted by: Mike W | September 4, 2008 8:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I have bought the last Washington Post and Newsweek I will ever buy (and I have bought plenty). The column was shameless.

Posted by: maria north | September 4, 2008 8:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How insightful!!!!!Did you go to school to learn to write like that?

Posted by: Barack JoeMamma | September 4, 2008 7:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Really appreciated your sharing with us your own personal experience. EXCELLENT articulation of why Affirmative Action is a bad thing both for those who are granted positions they haven't earned and for the rest of us who are forced to suffer their incompetence. People should NOT be given a position based upon either the color of their skin or their sex.

Cliff

Posted by: Cliff Cloonan | September 4, 2008 6:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally was so obnoxious on Fox news last night talking about Sarah Palin. The remark about her breastfeeding and difficulty running for VP......geez....get real! The only conculsion I came too is that you are jealous. Pull on your big girl pants and get over it!

Posted by: marinemom | September 4, 2008 6:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find it extremely ironic that a liberal woman, would chastise another woman, by essentially saying she should stay home and take care of her kids. Even more shocking this woman (Sally Quinn) criticizes her (Palins) lack of experience, when everyone knows she (Quinn) married her way to the top. I guess Liberals think the idea of women advancing politically is their exclusive domain.
Ha Ha Sally, wrong again. Palins going places and she doesn't need a dayglo orange pantsuit to get there.

Posted by: Poe | September 4, 2008 5:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Very well spoken. As a conservative Christian woman, wife of a Pastor and seven children, first grandchild on the way, where is the mom in all this. She will teach women a feminist position although Christian. Deborah sat under a tree to judge and the people came to her, she did not go out except to encourage a man to move forward. This double standard in the Christian community is a little discouraging but expected.

Posted by: Michelle Hensley | September 4, 2008 5:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So you think she should just stay home and be "barefoot and pregnant"? Would you say the same thing if the candidate were male?
I am a Democrat and all for Mr. Obama, but your comments about Mrs. Palin and just wrong! Are you jealous or just plain mean? Shame on you!

Posted by: Mike Oxard | September 4, 2008 5:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
Some of your criticisms are warranted re: Palin's qualifications, and everyone is entitled to their opinion. As a conservative, I wish McCain would have made a different choice. However, re: your view of evangelicals, you are clueless. Yes, there are those who think a mother should be home with the kids. I know several fairly liberal women who feel the same, and stay home with their kids. So, it's not just evangelicals. Where you are clueless is the fact that many evangelical women work, and many serve as ordained ministers. I know, I have a family full of them. And personally, I am home with my kids, right now, while my wife, a Major in the Air Force, and evangelical, works and serves our country. As a social worker who has worked with children and families for 20+ years I find some of you Feminists laughable. 30 years ago you wanted into the work-force, which I support, and for 20+ years you've defended the notion that 2 women or 2 men could raise children just as a mother and father (I know every side of that argument and understand). Now, suddenly, you're questioning this woman's ability to serve as Vice President as a mother. I think her husband is a part of the equation. Can Barack be a worthy father as President. Was Hillary much of a mother during her Co-Presidency with Bill? Is this situational ethics, or have you found yourself through this election, just like Barack , and Hillary?

Posted by: Michael Jay | September 4, 2008 4:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally

You are clueless

Posted by: Robert | September 4, 2008 4:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WHAT? Her first priority has to be her children? Says who? A mother's role is different from a father's? Not when you're the vice president. Is Sally Quinn serious?

Palin's husband who has a labor job in Alaska would obviously not continue working in his career once they moved to Washington. No steelworker jobs in DC.

So, who's to say that he couldn't just be a stay-at-home dad and be the primary caregiver of the kids? I mean, does Sally Quinn ACTUALLY think that Sarah is going to be the one getting up at night to tend to her baby when he wakes up in the middle of the night?

This is so bizarre.

Posted by: Cristina Portuondo | September 4, 2008 3:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn employs a sexist double standard in her consideraton of Sarah Palin's candidacy. She's concerned that Palin cannot manage to be a good mother and a Vice President because Palin has several small children. Does anyone think, even for a moment, Quinn would have criticized Joe Biden in 1972 when he began working as a young U.S. Senator, with two small children, within months of those little boys being traumatized by their mother's untimely death? Did anyone seriously contend rearing two small boys--without a wife--disqualified Biden form high office? We all know the answer to that question.

Simply put, Quinn despises Palin because Palin has strayed from the liberal plantaiton. Just as Quinn cannot accept African Americans, like Clarence Thomas or Condoleeza Rice, because they reject traditionally liberal causes and beliefs, she can only condemn a woman who denounces abortion. The fact that Palin favors gun rights, increased oil exploration and drilling, and small government, only serves to aggravate and incense Quinn all the more. Just as Colin Powell is not really "Black" because he does not subscribe to the civil rights grievance politics championed by the NAACP, so too is Sarah Palin not really "female" because she does not worship at the altar of the freedom most dear to liberal feminists like Quinn--the freedom to kill unborn children.

Posted by: Dan W. Taliaferro | September 4, 2008 3:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I have recently moved down to the USA from Canada and cannot believe that people actually support the Rep. Although, I do not agree with everything that you have written in your article, I do believe Paulin is not qualified. If the Rep. take a look at themselves in the mirror and hold up to the same standards they are putting against Barack - how can they say this is a good choice for VP?? This is simply a selection to try and steal Hillary Clinton supporters.

Posted by: foreign insight | September 4, 2008 3:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am disgusted and outraged with Sally Quinn's recent article about Governor Palin (Aug. 29, 2008, "Palin's Pregnancy Problem"). Instead of applauding, or even acknowledging, Gov. Palin's many accomplishments, Ms. Quinn's arrogance and snarky "know-it-all" attitude can allow her only to demean and denigrate.

Perhaps, being a wife and a full-time working mother is "too much ... too difficult" for Ms. Quinn. But, it is not for Gov. Palin, and it is not for millions of other women.

Ms. Quinn, maybe if you occasionally would leave the rarified atmosphere of your mansions and estates in the Hamptons, Maryland, and Georgetown, you can see real women going about their daily lives doing what they have to for their families -- all without the benefit of your opinions.

Posted by: Jan | September 4, 2008 3:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are such a through back to the 50's!! that a women has to choose to stay home with the kids just because she with a HUSBAND chose to have 5 of them is absurd!! Are you living under a rock?
What happened to the women's right to work? Do you not know about day care or nannies? Is it still not true about quality time vs. quantity? If this family has chosen this route or ANY family chooses to have working parents and the kids are tended to - how arrogant to pass judgement on what is a personal family decision.
I suggest you poll your employees at the Post and see how many of them share your archaic perspective!

Posted by: elaine S. | September 4, 2008 3:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I can't believe how you're criticizing this lady & her family. How would you like it if they did this to you. Stop trashing people!

Posted by: Carol | September 4, 2008 2:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I will never visit the Washington Post again. How in the world you receive a salary from such a prestigious publication is beyond me. I disagree with you 100% and after all of the attacks on McCain, I am simply done with you guys. I would come back if the Post was to never publish your rubbish ever again. You are a complete joke and screaming for attention. Being original isn't a crime but it requires vision, don't be such a follower of the mainstream media.

Posted by: shane | September 4, 2008 2:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Good lord Sally! As an ardent feminist, I have to say that this piece is incredibly offensive and sexist. So tell us, where was Ben when your son was being raised? In your attempt to bolster support for the Obama-nation, you have only disparaged women. Are you and Maureen Dowd pen pals? By the way, as a Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter and I can probably speak for many others, it wasn't so much about the strongest candidate losing, as it was about how the game was played - by the corrupt DNC, the many foul Obama supporters, the "white uncles" of current and previous political scenes, and the "race card playing" surrogates (hello Rep. Jim Clyburn).

Posted by: What a load of cr@p | September 4, 2008 2:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

She is WELL qualified--much moreso than Barak. This sounds like feminist hypocracy to me.

Posted by: gina | September 4, 2008 2:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How unbelievably smug this sounds coming from you. You clearly are threatened by her, and you and your DNC brothers and sisters are scared to death that Sarah Palin just sealed victory for John McCain. All the strides that powerful women have made, and you try to tear down Gov Palin because she's a republican. If she were a democrat, she'd be the poster child for assertive, powerful women, who multi-task with children, careers, husband, etc. If you must be so overtly against a republican woman, you should do mankind a great favor and resign from the Post. You're a disgrace to women everywhere, and worse yet, you're a complete political stooge for the liberal agenda.

Posted by: abear35 | September 4, 2008 1:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am horrified with your questioning and judgment of Sarah Palin as a mother. Is this not 2008? Hasn't the feminist movement supported all women with their choices in regards to career and family? You may not agree with his choice for VP, but to insinuate that she is not a good mother is outrageous. It is so disappointing, especially coming from a woman. I feel your column set us back decades.

Posted by: Carla Blake | September 4, 2008 1:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn,

You are a "feminist" hypocrite of the first degree. Gov. Palin, unlike you, has had a real job in a real small town. She has not rubbed elbows with the DC gliterati at Kennedy Center chablis and brie parties. She gets it, you don't.

My wife works and we have 3 children. One of them has had severe medical issues since birth. We have coped fine, and our family is all the stronger for it.

Wake up. Drive down 95 South to a small town in VA or NC and meet some real people. But be sure you "dress down" and leave the Italian designer clothes back home. I wouldn't want you to get insulted by the "unwashed" locals whom you would no doubt not understand either.

Sincerely,

Tom Neale

Posted by: Tom Neale | September 4, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Apparently Ms. Quinn lied about her skills with a gun to Bill O'Reilly, because she sure shot herself in the foot. Good thing (for her) that she was able to extracate said foot from her mouth beforehand. Please get out your Better Homes and Garden Cookbook and go back to being a Washinton hostess. Leave the work to the real women, and we'll bring you the moose steaks.

Posted by: I Want Moose for Dinner | September 4, 2008 11:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Apparently Ms. Quinn lied about her skills with a gun to Bill O'Reilly, because she sure shot herself in the foot. Good thing (for her) that she was able to extracate said foot from her mouth beforehand. Please get out your Better Homes and Garden Cookbook and go back to being a Washinton hostess. Leave the work to the real women, and we'll bring you the moose steaks.

Posted by: I Want Moose for Dinner | September 4, 2008 11:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am sure what you are really referring to is that you, Ms. Quinn, would find it personally difficult to balance a large family and a high profile and demanding position. It is understandable since it would require a temendous amount of ability and stamina. What you and many of your conceited pen pals are suffering from is fear and envy of powerful women. That, too, is understandable. Get over it.

Posted by: J F Rector | September 4, 2008 11:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn:

You don't know the Governor, yet you pretend to know that she is unqualified and was chosen simply because she is a woman? Please give me one-half hour with both Sen. Obama or Sen. Biden, and I will use my knowledge and background as but a simple small town attorney and CPA to make them look utterly foolish about tax policy and business and economic issues. 95% (or 80% or whatever their statistic is for the day) of Americans will receive a tax break? Rubbish. Every dime that comes out of ANY U.S. taxpayer's pocket (individual and business) is a tax on ALL Americans, because it is that much less that goes back into the economy to acquire capital goods, provide employment, grow the economy, and actually promote savings by the few people who do not squander their paycheck on Bud and Camels. But that hardly makes them unqualified, as Messrs. Obama and Biden will rely upon their advisors. Just as Governors Clinton, Regan, Carter, F.D. Roosevelt, T. Roosevelt and some 15 other governors did when they ascended to the Presidency.

More disturbing, however, is your obvious projection. Your admitted professional failures (at CBS, for example) and your concession that you would be unable to manage your family and workload as well as, say, Sarah Palin, hardly support your argument. In fact, I can count many, many women who've accomplished far more than you or even Gov. Palin and managed a family just fine. One woman in particular I know is VP of a huge global public corporation, has several young children, runs marathons and competes in triathlons, devotes significant time to charitable work, oh, and yes, is a cancer survivor. And, she's Gov. Palin's age! So while you've been honest about your visceral reactions (shock and anger), it may well be jealousy that causes you such discomfort.

A mother's role is different from a father's? Wow! In that case, I hope you do not advocate same-sex marriage or parenting, because obviously you cannot believe children raised in such a situation could ever receive an adeqate upbringing. Or do you advocate only lesbian partner parenting, because you really mean fathers are superfluous? The last time I checked, the only thing I could not offer my children is breast milk. I trust Gov. Palin when she says she's got that under control.

Posted by: Scott L | September 4, 2008 11:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is an advocate for women...just as long as they are LIBERAL women! She was brave to appear on "The Factor". Why? Because she had to know the majority of O'Reilly's viewers were looking at her with utter contempt and for just reason after the "sexist" column she wrote about Sarah Palin. Last night we saw Sarah the Barracuda "ImPALINg" the opposition including far leftist critics like Sally Quinn!

Posted by: James A. Webster | September 4, 2008 10:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is an advocate for women...just as long as they are LIBERAL women! She was brave to appear on "The Factor". Why? Because she had to know the majority of O'Reilly's viewers were looking at her with utter contempt and for just reason after the "sexist" column she wrote about Sarah Palin. Last night we saw Sarah the Barracuda "ImPALINg" the opposition including far leftist critics like Sally Quinn!

Posted by: James A. Webster | September 4, 2008 10:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Geez, Just when I thought the days of "woman slavery" had ended and us women had gained our due freedoms to work outside the home......along comes Sally Quinn with these totally absurd remarks about Palin. Two of my daughters got pregnant before marriage, I worked full time and still managed to be there for them, my other children, my grandchildren, my husband, my church and various committees in my community.

Posted by: JoAnne | September 4, 2008 10:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I cannot recall reading a more dogmatic, hypocritical, self-absorbed, and blatantly sexist opinion piece - what a leap backward from decades of progress in women's equal rights and respect at work and at home! You should be ashamed of yourself.

Posted by: Jim Byrom | September 4, 2008 10:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I thought Sarah Palin was everything the "feminists" have been telling us women can be for years now. I guess it only applies to liberal/democratic women. How sad and old Ms. Quinn sounds.

Posted by: Susan Emrick | September 4, 2008 10:11 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Geez, you get paid to write this garbage?

What have women been screaming for all these years? To be recognized as being able to achieve and do some things men can do.

And now one is there and you write this drivel?

You're a moron. You really can't believe you are to be taken seriously?

Posted by: Stephen | September 4, 2008 10:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn has cited the Southern Baptist Faith and message, but obviuosly she does not understand SERVANT leadership. That term is not denegrating to the one being led but connotes the leader being a servant to the one being led! That is a great thing in marriage and would be great in government!

Posted by: Lisbeth Turner | September 4, 2008 9:50 AM
Report Offensive Comment

How dare you. Would you spout this type of hate toward a man? No, I doubt you would. Nothing like a woman who is a true sexist! You should be ashamed of yourself. She is a mother who works. Just like many others. Her gender is not the issue, the issue is that close-minded and simple people like you are not happy unless the woman is a three-time abortion using godless liberal.

Posted by: Robert | September 4, 2008 9:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

How ironic is it that the left-slanted media (and this is by no means all media) such as Sally Quinn may have just taken down the democratic candidates for president in the 2008 election? With a sitting Republican president enjoying an approval rating of 33% http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob1.htm and an unpopular war in two Mideast countries HOW COULD THEY SCREW THIS UP? They may have just found a way. Obama's message of hope inspired me and I was on the fence until now. Thank you Sally Quinn!

Posted by: John M | September 4, 2008 9:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You my dear are a hypocrite! Shame on you for berating a Mom who has raised her children with morals, we parents cannot make every decision in life for our children. We parents give guidance and hope. Teen pregnancies happen everywhere in every lifestyle, rich or poor, religious and atheist. I give the Palin’s credit for standing by their daughter giving her love and support. She made a mistake.

You, Sally need to go to the local high school and listen to this generation and not be so judgmental when you have no idea what is out in the real world!

Her daughter and her boyfriend made the choice and now will reap the consequences. It is not only up to the girl to prevent pregnancies but the boy could have too! He is just as responsible!!!!!!!

Posted by: Janine Halsey | September 4, 2008 9:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You my dear are a hypocrite! Shame on you for berating a Mom who has raised her children with morals, we parents cannot make every decision in life for our children. We parents give guidance and hope. Teen pregnancies happen everywhere in every lifestyle, rich or poor, religious and atheist. I give the Palin’s credit for standing by their daughter giving her love and support. She made a mistake.

You, Sally need to go to the local high school and listen to this generation and not be so judgmental when you have no idea what is out in the real world!

Her daughter and her boyfriend made the choice and now will reap the consequences. It is not only up to the girl to prevent pregnancies but the boy could have too! He is just as responsible!!!!!!!

Posted by: Janine Halsey | September 4, 2008 9:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am an Evangelical Christian, I also work as a computer analyst for a major defense contractor. I am also a retired veteran, with 22 years of Army Service. My wife is a store manager for a worldwide retail firm. My wife chose her career in part based on my career, as I had been in the Army five years when we met, and she took a career that she liked and at the same time would not interfere with my career, we discussed this before we got married, in otherwords, we discussed the issue and reached a mutually agreeable 'compromise'. My wife is not subservient to my wishes, and nothing in our religion says she has to be. In matters of our relationship we discuss and act on nearly everything. Granted, when I went to college she didn't pick my major, I did, but then I don't tell her how to do her job either.

Based on my experience, and the experience of others, with whom we associate, Ms Quinn, knows little about real Evangelicals, nor does she seem to know anything about the average family. Perhaps the world she is discussing matters pertaining to evangelicals inside the beltway, a world of it's own that holds little resemblance to most of the real world. Then again I could be wrong, Ms. Quinns bizzare description of evangelicals may simply be her own fantasy.

Posted by: Jon Weiss | September 4, 2008 8:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin was the attack dog that all at the RNC had hoped she's be.

Dems at home, Biden and Barack included were probably at home screaming "GAME ON!"

That said, let the games begin. Sarah is NO SHRINKING VIOLET, so please lets let her get out there and fight her fight, without others coming to her rescue when it may appear that she is smacked around.
As a woman I LOVE a feisty, outspoken, confident woman who can handle her own. What I DONT like is when such a woman isnt winning round for round, she sheds a few tears to get sympathy or calls in her big brothers to come to her aid. Will Sarah play that game? I hope not. But in order to keep the "women can do it all" label for ALL women, she has to be consistent. Duke it out with the big boys, go for the jugular, but be able to stand strong when you get backhanded by your opponent without crying foul. I do caution her from here on about parading the family around because she runs the risk of it backfiring. Its great that she is a mom of five, running a state, etc. However if she routinely parades Bristol and Trig, she makes them a part of the discussion and that invites criticism from the other side and rightfully so, it will come.
Personally, I would love to get an interview with Levi and his family. They too are effected by this sudden fame.As a mom of a teen son I can only imagine how rattled he must be at this point.

To paraphrase a true tough woman, Bette Davis "Fasten your seatbelts. It's going to be a bumpy TWO MONTHS!"

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 4, 2008 8:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate (...) is a choice made to try to win an election."

What a shock! What candidate for President has ever chosen a running mate that would help him win the election?!

"(Palin) seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person. She certainly has been successful in her 44 years."

Impressive argument not to vote for her... I guess.

"Palin's lack of experience..."
When someone mentions 'lack of experience of someone trying to get elected for office' Palin is NOT the first name to come to mind. Guess what is.

"There were women at CBS who were much more qualified than I was and certainly other men. They chose me because they wanted a woman."

Wait... rewind.

"There were women at CBS who were much more qualified than I was and (...) They chose me because they wanted a woman."

So, there were other women more qualified but they wanted a woman so they chose you?! Judging from this post, no wonder it was a disaster.

For the record, I'm not supporting McCain/Palin. The first and only reason is that I'm not even an american voter (I'm portuguese). But articles like yours sure make me wish they win.

Posted by: Joaquim | September 4, 2008 7:23 AM
Report Offensive Comment

From one Sally to another, Quinn's interview on O'Reilly last night gave me the creeps. This self-important, self described hostess of D.C. came off as, best described, skanky. Sarah Palin shined the light on Quinn who, by now, has crawled back into the woodwork.

Posted by: Anne in Northern Atlanta | September 4, 2008 6:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

From one Sally to another, Quinn's interview on O'Reilly last night gave me the creeps. This self-important, self described hostess of D.C. came off as, best described, skanky. Sarah Palin shined the light on Quinn who, by now, has crawled back into the woodwork.

Posted by: Sally Northern Altanta | September 4, 2008 6:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

From one Sally to another, Quinn's interview on O'Reilly last night gave me the creeps. This self-important, self described hostess of D.C. came off as, best described, skanky. Sarah Palin shined the light on Quinn who, by now, has crawled back into the woodwork.

Posted by: Sally Northern Altanta | September 4, 2008 6:19 AM
Report Offensive Comment

From one Sally to another, Quinn's interview on O'Reilly gave me the creeps. This self-satisfied and self-proclaimed hostess came off in no other terms skanky. Sarah Palin shines the light on Quinn, who by now has slunk back into the woodwork.

Posted by: Sally in Atlanta | September 4, 2008 6:15 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Give me a break! This is exactly what liberal feminists have been touting as the perfect female life choice -- you can have it all -- husband, kids, successful career! Now that the example of this is a conservative woman liberals are ready to take back everything they've said they staunchly believed in. I also wonder why the first reaction to a woman being chosen for vice president is shock and anger. It seems sexist to assume that a woman being chosen is automatically for political marketing gain and not just because she was the best choice.

Posted by: E. Luke | September 4, 2008 5:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

When a person attacks the press, the free press, the media, journalism, reporters, liberal press, liberal media, call it what you like -- when you attack the press you are not being a good American. You are being an angry person, maybe even an angry American, but most of the time you need to calm down and think. What does it really mean to stand up for America?

Remember the soldiers who die for our freedoms. Freedom of the press is one of those freedoms. Some of you should be ashamed. You wave a big flag but our flag is more than an attack flag, it's a freedom of expression, freedom of the press and freedom of religion flag, too. You don't need trinket jewelry on your lapel to uphold the flag. You need to uphold what the flag represents. Stand up for a free press, don't be attacking the people doing their jobs. What do you want, regulate the press by intimidation, force them to tell only the stories you want people to see?

Let the media do its job without going ballistic. If you don't like one newspaper, do what real Americans do -- go read a different newspaper or start one of your own.

Or express your contrary opinion, but do it with reason, like the writers of the Federalist Papers did when they put together a little something we Americans refer to as the Constitution of the United States of America. That's what your candidate suffered for in Viet Nam. Ask him. That's what either McCain or Obama (may the best man win) will swear to uphold, as they have done, and always will. Ask them.

I realize a lot of the "attack mode" messages here are meant to be part of a strategy to suppress the media to the advantage of the presidential candidate you prefer. You want to win votes for your favorite person by making sure no one hears anything but your side's opinion.

When you do that, you are trying to take away my right to consider facts and opinions, reasonably expressed, and to make a free choice on election day. That's not what America stands for. Listen to reason, sometimes it really does speak softly and carry a big stick.

"The world has always been more impressed by the power of our example than the example of our power."

Posted by: Citizen of Chicago | September 4, 2008 5:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

so what kind of foreign policy did hillary have? ducking for shots that werent fired? to make her look good, self admitted..oh, because she had bill arouned i see, well palin would have many more educated that are going to let bin laden go the way bill did. he was a terrible president, and you would give him another shot at helping wreck the country more than he already has on so many levels..

and obamas only experience is hanging with a bunch of anti american rev wright who thinks we deserved 911, and bill ayers which who he was on many committees, and hung out together, many parties, and obama campaign was launched from ayers house..someone who said he didnt blow up enough govt blgs, that tell me eith he thinks like all these crooks and crims, or he has bad judgement

Posted by: zsa | September 4, 2008 5:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

so what kind of foreigh policy did hillary have? ducking for shots that werent fired? to make her look good, self admitted..oh, because she had bill arounmd i see, well palin would have many more educated that are going to let bin laden go the way bill did. he was a terrible president, and you would give him another shot at helping wreck the country more than he already has on so many levels..

and obamas only experience is hanging with a bunch of anti american rev wright who thinks we deserved 911, and bill ayers which who he was on many committees, and hung out together, many parties, and obama campaign was launed from ayers house..someone who said he didnt blow up enough govt blgs, that tell me eith he thinks like all these crooks and crims, or he has bad judgement, either way he isnt fit to be a senator let alone president...disgusting

Posted by: zsa | September 4, 2008 5:26 AM
Report Offensive Comment

so what kind of foreigh policy did hillary have? ducking for shots that werent fired? to make her look good, self admitted..oh, because she had bill arounmd i see, well palin would have many more educated that are going to let bin laden go the way bill did. he was a terrible president, and you would give him another shot at helping wreck the country more than he already has on so many levels..

and obamas only experience is hanging with a bunch of anti american rev wright who thinks we deserved 911, and bill ayers which who he was on many committees, and hung out together, many parties, and obama campaign was launed from ayers house..someone who said he didnt blow up enough govt blgs, that tell me eith he thinks like all these crooks and crims, or he has bad judgement, either way he isnt fit to be a senator let alone president...disgusting

Posted by: zsa | September 4, 2008 5:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

so what kind of foreigh policy did hillary have? ducking for shots that werent fired? to make her look good, self admitted..oh, because she had bill arounmd i see, well palin would have many more educated that are going to let bin laden go the way bill did. he was a terrible president, and you would give him another shot at helping wreck the country more than he already has on so many levels..

and obamas only experience is hanging with a bunch of anti american rev wright who thinks we deserved 911, and bill ayers which who he was on many committees, and hung out together, many parties, and obama campaign was launed from ayers house..someone who said he didnt blow up enough govt blgs, that tell me eith he thinks like all these crooks and crims, or he has bad judgement, either way he isnt fit to be a senator let alone president...disgusting

Posted by: zsa | September 4, 2008 5:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally for the sake of the country I am praying John McCain does not win. There are too many issues that needs to be addressed and he is playing games with the presidency. I do not know of any Hillary voters who does not see this as an insult. It is a sad time for america, McCain will make us Prisoners in our own lives.

Posted by: Heather Dyce | September 4, 2008 3:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

First of all doesn't Nancy Pelosi have 5 kids?? Ms. Quinn go back and read your bible evangelicals are not taught to be "subservient" as in doormats. Biblical principle teaches submission only to husbands who are submitted to Christ and love there wife as Christ Loved the church.(Ephesians 5 and Proverbs 31) So this religious rhetoric your trying to discredit Palin with is erroneous! It's outright hypocritical especially since the Dems/ liberal left don't uphold to the same values. So what if she has 5 kids, if she can handle it and hubby supports it and will be home with the kids it's none of our business. Aren't you feminazi's the first ones preachin women can raise a family and run a country? Or does that only apply if your a "liberal"?

Posted by: Breal | September 4, 2008 3:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

I saw you tonight on Bill O'Reilly or whatever his name is. I thought you held your own and then some. I did not know that is was a qualification to be able to use a rifle to lead our country but, you surprised him with your comment. You have totally struck a cord with me on your opinion. I am an independent and totally not a political person. But, this issue of picking this woman with her lack of experience along with more family issues than any of us can even imagine shows to me a total lack in the decision making from McCain. I can only imagine what process he would use to pick our next Supreme Court Justice. Even more alarming to me is that this woman who had a special needs newborn baby and another baby on the way from her 17 year old daughter would even for a minute think about taking on a role of campaigning and possibly becoming our VP or President of the US. She should of said thanks but no thanks as any good mother would do. This to me is very alarming in that the far right and Republications think she is a role model who preach that they are the party of family values. Her family needs her a lot more than the country does. It really makes me question how good of a mother she is to put her family and her pregnant daughter on the front stage and in the middle of the media storm. Shame on John McCain and the Christian right wing for applauding her. I as a woman think she is a pawn and has a huge ego. When this is all over all that will remain with be a bunch of tabloid covers of her pregnant teenage daughter. I am now convinced that I will vote Democratic and McCain's ploy to put up a token woman to attract the Hillary vote backfired. And guess what I was not even going to vote for Hillary anyway and I was even considering voting for McCain. Women can make informed choices and are smart enough to realize that this woman does not believe in any of the issues Hillary supported. I think John McCain does not respect the women voters and does not realize that the first thing we women look at is a person's character and how good of a mother or family situation they have and then next what issues the candidate represents. Sarah Palin fails in the character role in that her newborn child and forthcoming grandchild need her. Her next failure is that she would out her unwed teenage daughter for the sake of her own career. Her last failing is that most of the mainstream population do not agree with her extreme views such as no sex education only abstinence (it did not work in her home). We do not just vote for a candidate because she is our same sex we do have a brain John McCain.

Posted by: susan | September 4, 2008 3:08 AM
Report Offensive Comment

For someone who is running on a family values platform, she has the gall to tell everyone else what they should do with their kids and their bodies while she admits that not all families are perfect and excuses her own parenting skills.

The stories about her daughter, though unseemly, are definitely relevant -- especially when she seems okay parading the unmarried couple all over the RNC for political purposes. It's also relevant when your platform is pro-family. The self-righteousness of Republicans, to me, smacks of elitism.

Posted by: IE | September 4, 2008 2:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey Sally,

You and your little petty backbiting commentary are getting more laughable by the day.

Did you see the Palin speech? Coming out there after you creeps in the mainstream media have been piling on for days trying to break her spirit? Coming out there and casually swatting you despicable left-wing hypocrites aside like a nuisance fly, and commencing to give an excellent, perfectly delivered, rousing speech -- and making it look easy. She stood there with perfect aplomb and showed shrewdness, presence, and command. She was confidence-inspiring.

How's it feel, Sally, to be one of the pretentiously sanctimonious hypocrites -- how's it feel to be a sham? How's it feel to be doing the dirty work for your sexist smarmy old-boy liberal Democrat overlords?

Pretty low, I would think.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 4, 2008 1:56 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You know what I haven't seen covered in the press? How hands-on of a dad is Mr. Palin? Sure, he's a busy guy, but if he is there to fill in the gaps left by Ms. Palin's career, what's wrong with that?

Of course, there are a lot of things wrong with Ms. Palin as a vice president, and I don't think I'd vote her ticket. BUT, singling her out for being a working mom . . . how hypocritical can you get? Let the evangelists wrestle with their consciences as they will. Do YOU dislike her because she's a working mom? Or do you dislike her candidacy for other reasons?

The voters are smart enough to see through ridiculous arguments like this . . . aren't they? Aren't they?

Posted by: M. Haller Yamada | September 4, 2008 1:34 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Jean Oneill writes: "Watching the Republican Convention tonight, with flashes between those beautiful young children and that nasty, pushy woman was too much. No mothering instincts whatsoever."

I have to respectfully disagree with your comment. I think she has outstanding mothering instincts. She is a role model to all women, young and old and in between. She showed restraint while the media and critics questioned her family's moral values, and her parenting skills.

In her speech, she refuted each attack with poise and dignity.

As a mother of two daughters and a son, I want my daughters to be self-assured and assertive. I want my son to take take an active role in nurturing and raising his children.

I applaud Sarah and Todd Palin.

When will we stop perceiving women who are confident and decisive as being aggressive and "nasty"?

Posted by: julie | September 4, 2008 1:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Is the rumor true that she will quit?

Posted by: Is Ms. Quinn resigning? | September 4, 2008 12:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin was excellent. She spoke to the base with her attacks on the Dems. She was feisty, almost cocky, but effective. Pitbull with lipstick. Thats a good thing and a bad thing. Good- The audience got their RED MEAT. Bad- its game on now from the Dems prospective and no one can scream sexism or try to come to her aid,etc. She stepped to the big boys, so now she has got to be able to take the punches without anyone else coming to rescue a damsel in distress.

Posted by: TruthSpeaker | September 4, 2008 12:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sounds like a bad case of sour grapes!

Posted by: Mark | September 4, 2008 12:17 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am glad I can read for myself what all the noise was about. I kept hearing Sally Quinn said this and Sally said that and how awful...etc etc

It seems to me, unfortunately, that all the Republicans have to run against is the liberal media. They have no issues to bring up otherwise, having given away the experience card.

I like Ms Palin and with some additional experience she would be a very very formidable political force. Provided she held open meetings, she would make a good energy czar.

But back to Sally..this article raises good, tough points which people should consider seriously, especially Republican women if they can get past the "media elite" garbage and take in a view that actually might be what they truly believe in but just need to read it.

Posted by: Charles Zwilling | September 3, 2008 11:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I just watched Sarah Palin's speech and am shocked at how impressive she is compared to the misogynistic stereotypes peddled by Sally Quinn. As a female with an advanced degree, an executive position, and two children, I do not agree with Sally Quinn that I should be compelled to give up my job to a man so I can waddle off and cook and clean. Shame on Sally. It appears her child was the one with a special needs mother and not vice versa.

Posted by: Sue | September 3, 2008 11:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Sally:

Keep attacking Sarah Palin! She'll chew you up and spit you out. That lady stole the show when she got an opportunity. If my memory doesn't fail me, I think you failed miserably under similar, but much less stressful circumstances. Says a lot about you. You're no Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin for PRESIDENT!

Posted by: Bobby D. Allison | September 3, 2008 11:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Sally:

Keep attacking Sarah Palin! She'll chew you up and spit you out. That lady stole the show when she got an opportunity. If my memory doesn't fail me, I think you failed miserably under similar, but mucy less stressful circumstances. Says a lot about you. You're no Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin for PRESIDENT!

Posted by: Bobby D. Allison | September 3, 2008 11:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Sally:

Keep attacking Sarah Palin! She'll chew you up and spit you out. That lady stole the show when she got an opportunity. If my memory doesn't fail me, I think you failed miserably under similar, but mucy less stressful circumstances. Says a lot about you. You're no Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin for PRESIDENT!

Posted by: Bobby D. Allison | September 3, 2008 11:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

After having had a chance to watch, listen, and
think about McCain's choice for V.P. I concur
with your comments to a "T." Sarah Palin is not
Hillary Clinton, and I believe McCain saw an
opportunistic moment to grab up and throw in a
virtual "unknown" to the political scene solely
on gender and relative youth. She does not appear to have the breadth and depth of experience that many of candidates who ran in the primaries. I am surprised at his choice and not pleased.

Posted by: Madeleine | September 3, 2008 11:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Watching the Republican Convention tonight, with flashes between those beautiful young children and that nasty, pushy woman was too much.

No mothering instincts whatsoever.

jean oneal

Posted by: jean oneal | September 3, 2008 11:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

one question for you Mz. Sally Quin--HOW DO YOU LIKE SARAH NOW???????????

SHE IS MY HERO! she is more woman than you will ever be!

Admittedly, I am a Republican that was wavering on her vote and questioning my loyalty to my party. I was almost sucked in to believing the "brainwashing" techniques of a slick and smooth orator--Obama!

Shame on me! Sarah Palin just sealed the deal for me--I'm voting for McCain.

Just a little "FYI," I am a woman, I am a wife, I am a mother, I am a Christian, I am a Business Administrator for a church, I am a volunteer, I am also a voter!


Posted by: HOW DO YOU LIKE ME NOW | September 3, 2008 11:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Shame on you for your baseless, sexist attacks against a woman. This is not critical journalism or even informed opionion, but just plain mean spirited bias.

You point out that Sarah Palin has no foreign policy experience. Please note that she has as much foreign policy experience as Barak Obama does, but she is the Vice President candidate, not the Presedential candidate. I can only assume that John McCain will be setting the policy for awhile, giving Sarah a chance to come up to speed. Barak would have to delegate that responsibility to his VP.

It is a shame a woman would take such an outdated and unfair view. This is not part of the America I hope for for my neices.

Is this the Washington Post or the Huffington Post?

Posted by: Dale | September 3, 2008 10:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The truth comes out. Liberals celebrate the anniversary of the sufferage movement yet, when a conservative woman is given this honor and opportunity you downgrade it to insulting politics and call her "unqualified." The truth is, if Obama had nominated a Palinesque woman, she would be hoisted atop all the liberals shoulders, and they would have screamed we are the party of unity and we are finally breaking the glass cieling. The suggestion that McCain is being insensitive to the needs of Palins family and using her as a political tool is insulting on numerous levels to McCain and Palin. My last point is this. Had a conservative black man like Alan Keys won the Conservative nomination, no liberals would be talking about how great it was that a black man would be president. They would simply discredit him.

Posted by: David | September 3, 2008 10:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,
It's Okay. You don't have to worry about the Republicans. You have your hands full worrying about the mess the Dems and the liberal media (you included) are getting themselves into by exposing their own hatred, intolerance and hypocrisy.

Cause guess what!! Now moderates and independents (like me) clearly see that liberals don't care about women, don't care about ordinary people, don't care about babies, don't care about children.

I'm also sorry to have to tell you this, but Washington party circuit isn't going to be the same soon. There are going to be some real, normal people coming to town -- some from as far away as Alaska.

And I hope they slam the door in your face.

Posted by: kittiewan | September 3, 2008 9:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah,
By explaining that Sarah Palin's husband Todd is an inadequate caregiver to provide for their children and by advocating that all mothers stay home rather than seek an education or work, you've also delivered a powerful argument against gay male couples raising children. After all, when a child is sick and there is no mother to attend, how will two grown gay males provide nurture to a child? All that's missing from your article is an explanation of when you demand that the Democrats pass a law mandating American women must wear burqas. Or are you waiting for a Constitutional Amendment outlawing the female gender?

Posted by: Mustafa | September 3, 2008 9:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment


You are a hateful person. I think you are a little
jealous of Sarah Palin. I can read it between the lines. I thought someone as acclaimed as you would
not have written such a column. I am disappointed.

Posted by: Annette Trent | September 3, 2008 9:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn, Army brat and feminazi hypocrit.

Posted by: Jayne | September 3, 2008 9:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The idea that Sarah Palin can't juggle the VP position with family life is ludicrous. Why should Obama be any more able to juggle his presidental position with fatherhood than Palin her position as Vice President? Aren't fathers just as important to a family network as mothers? If Palin has her support network in position (and I think she does) then there should be no problem.

I was a stay-at-home mom. That was 1968 through 1988. However, that was then and that was me. Times have changed! I have friends now who are working fulltime with the support of their husbands with no real problems. One of them is running a large foundation, has obligations which take her out of town frequently and yet she still has had time to raise a family. She has four children, none of which are love deprived . . . . they are all fantastic kids, and her relationship with them is very strong. She has a very hands-on husband and a very competent MANNY. Yes, if it weren't for the support of these two men her job would be very difficult.

I don't think it will be any different for Sarah Palin. She will have the support of her husband, family and friends. Plus, I'm sure that she could get extra paid help if needed.

Don't count anyone out just because they may be doing it differently than you!

Is Sally Quinn jealous or what?

Ann Dewey

Posted by: Ann Dewey | September 3, 2008 9:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
I totally agree with this article and the views you have stated.
I am a mother of 2 college age sons that are very independent now but I know the time I invested in getting them to this point in their life.I also work.

I also believe no one is talking about the true facts about teenage motherhood. We should not be celebrating this.The boyfriends don't hang around for long and the babies are supported by the grandparents or the child has to go on welfare. We have a segment of the population in this country that thinks this is okay. Mrs. Palin stated she was happy on her daughter's future marriage to this 17 yr. old. I question Mrs. Palins judgment and her values ,if she is happy about her 17 yr. old getting married. We do not need to send this message to young people.
We have a huge underclass in this society that does not value education and this attitude validates their lifestyle.That lifestyle also keeps people in a cycle of poverty.
Motherhood is about more than just giving birth.
She made the decision to have 5 children and she needs to make the right choice now. What mother or father allows their 17 yr. old daughter to be in this media firestorm? This is so hard on a teenager even when you don't have the world chasing you around. I am questioning the party I have been supportive of for 25 years.

Posted by: susan Frazier | September 3, 2008 9:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

'CHANGE IS GOOD! (but only if it serves our own agenda)

Kudos to Sally Quinn!

It's reassuring to know that, in times of uncertainty, we can always count on the Democrats' consistent message, which is:

"We are here for the average person--we will help the hard working Middle Class, we will speak out for equal rights and equal pay for women, we will support single moms, and minorities, and we will fight for the right for a woman to CHOOSE, but only if you CHOOSE what we believe!"

Sally Quinn will spare no cost when it comes to winning--even to attack a woman and mother(Sarah Palin) who has spent her entire life teaching her daughter, by example, that a woman can:

CHOOSE TO BE SINGLE OR CHOOSE TO BE MARRIED
CHOOSE TO HAVE A FAMILY
CHOOSE TO HAVE A CAREER
CHOOSE TO HAVE A CAREER AND A FAMILY
CHOOSE TO HAVE SEX OR CHOOSE TO ABSTAIN
CHOOSE TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR OUR ACTIONS
CHOOSE TO LOVE YOURSELF
CHOOSE TO FORGIVE YOURSELF

Way to go Sally!

Posted by: I CHOOSE TO HAVE A CHOICE | September 3, 2008 9:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You truly do not have a clue and are a classic case of how intelligence is not synonymous with wisdom or just plain common sense. As G. K. Chesterton said, and in his honor I'll paraphrase him rather than look up an exact quote here, "children are mankind's way or saying the world should go on." I'd take the average mother of five to run this country any day over 98% of the politicians in DC. And the job would be a step down for the mother, not a step up - I doubt you folks inside the beltway with your messed up measuring sticks get this.

Posted by: Kevin Ryan | September 3, 2008 9:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The position you've presented here offends me. As a 40-something mother of 3 - all special needs, all girls, and small business owner with my husband, I would never seek to impose my opinions of what other women should or should not do onto them.

. We are blessed in this country to have the ability to make a choice about how we live our lives - we are not chattle, as women are still considered in other parts of the world.

. We are blessed with the intelligence to make choices that do not always follow the beaten path, to discover wonderous opportunity - that spirit is what drives American women to move ahead and embrace leadership roles.

While you made a choice you felt was "disastrous" and was simply because you are a woman, other women make choices every day that help open doors for the women that follow them. Are we, regardless of the reason, to remain in the seats of secretary, teacher or nurse while men assume C-level positions? I think eBay's CEO Meg Whitman might have something to say about that.

We all make decisions in life based on our experiences and personal situation. When I married and then had children, I set out to change the traditional role of husband and father. I wanted my husband to be involved, to feel the same pride and joy I experienced - and he has and does.

To suggest in any way that Sarah Palin would win for "all the wrong reasons" is to reveal a serious flaw in your objectivity. There are women out here who believe every woman should be given the chance at anything if they want it - should we not be supportive of other women's choices? After all, unless we have walked in her shoes or anyone else's, we are in no position to know what anyone wants or can achieve.

I want as many strong, talented female role models for my girls as possible; I would never want them to think others in the public have control over their decisions. They will most likely experience the glass ceiling when they grow, years in the future, if nothing changes.

As Senator Fred Thompson pointed out during his address at the Republican National Convention, change is more than empty words.

Changing the role of women in society starts with us - and every woman counts. Perhaps you could reconsider your position after you have provided her with a chance to share more about who she is and what she wants to do, as Bill O'Reilly suggested.

Posted by: Melanie | September 3, 2008 9:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a 62 year old woman who feels like I went to sleep one night and woke up 45 years earlier when women were nurses and teachers (I happen to be a teacher). I have since raised 2 daughters, both of whom are successful businesswomen. One of my daughter's best friends is a highly paid executive with a technology firm ($1 million a year) whose husband stays home and takes care of their 2 children. This is a common situation and should be a common situation--it depends entirely on the marriage choices of the couple. I am furious that we seem to be losing all that we fought to gain. You have certainly motivated me to get out and campaign for Palin--and it looks like I am also once again fighting for equal rights for women (thought I had been there and done that)!

Posted by: Carol Hunt | September 3, 2008 9:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a 62 year old woman who feels like I went to sleep one night and woke up 45 years earlier when women were nurses and teachers (I happen to be a teacher). I have since raised 2 daughters, both of whom are successful businesswomen. One of my daughter's best friends is a highly paid executive with a technology firm ($1 million a year) whose husband stays home and takes care of their 2 children. This is a common situation and should be a common situation--it depends entirely on the marriage choices of the couple. I am furious that we seem to be losing all that we fought to gain. You have certainly motivated me to get out and campaign for Palin--and it looks like I am also once again fighting for equal rights for women (thought I had been there and done that)!

Posted by: Carol Hunt | September 3, 2008 9:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you really shouldn't be writing about Sarah Palin in the semi-critical way you have. You are not qualified! Look at your own past life and your dalliances, etc, etc. Of course, you are taking the wrong stance here with Gov. Palin. She knows what she is doing. You, clearly, don't.

Posted by: Penny Parker | September 3, 2008 9:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The position you've presented here offends me. As a 40-something mother of 3 - all special needs, all girls, and small business owner with my husband, I would never seek to impose my opinions of what other women should or should not do onto them.

. We are blessed in this country to have the ability to make a choice about how we live our lives - we are not chattle, as women are still considered in other parts of the world.

. We are blessed with the intelligence to make choices that do not always follow the beaten path, to discover wonderous opportunity - that spirit is what drives American women to move ahead and embrace leadership roles.

While you made a choice you felt was "disastrous" and was simply because you are a woman, other women make choices every day that help open doors for the women that follow them. Are we, regardless of the reason, to remain in the seats of secretary, teacher or nurse while men assume C-level positions? I think eBay's CEO Meg Whitman might have something to say about that.

We all make decisions in life based on our experiences and personal situation. When I married and then had children, I set out to change the traditional role of husband and father. I wanted my husband to be involved, to feel the same pride and joy I experienced - and he has and does.

To suggest in any way that Mrs. Palin would win for "all the wrong reasons" is to reveal a serious flaw in your objectivity. There are women out here who believe every woman should be given the chance at anything if they want it - should we not be supportive of other women's choices? After all, unless we have walked in her shoes or anyone else's, we are in no position to know what anyone wants or can achieve.

I want as many strong, talented female role models for my girls as possible; I would never want them to think others in the public have control over their decisions. They will most likely experience the glass ceiling when they grow, years in the future, if nothing changes.

As Senator Fred Thompson pointed out during his address at the Republican National Convention, change is more than empty words.

Changing the role of women in society starts with us - and every woman counts. Perhaps you could reconsider your position after you have provided her with a chance to share more about who she is and what she wants to do, as Bill O'Reilly suggested.

Posted by: Melanie | September 3, 2008 9:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, I just saw your attempt to defend this column on the O'Reilly Factor. In a word... instructive. Governor Sarah Palin reached your "tipping point" when she accepted McCain's V.P slot while breast feeding a newborn with downes syndrome and will raise a sixth child when her teenager daughter gives birth. Thank you Ms. Quinn, for proving you are emotionally spent, morally bankrupt and intellectually vapid. There's no reason O'Relly should invite you back. You clearly have nothing to offer America. Ms Quinn, examine your own heart and re-examine your own children. 26 years of your parenting skills has likely robbed them of all humanity. Pathetic.

Posted by: Nancy Lamb | September 3, 2008 9:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow - Ms Quinn

you really are sitting on the right hand of God.

Honestly, I am so very insulted by your views about Gov. Palin. I am a Republican woman, a professional engineer for 25 years and now a small business owner. I am also first and foremost a mother of two sons - a soldier's mom and a former soccer and hockey mom. I was a single mother for ten years and was the primary bread winner for my two children because I had an exhusband who had the Seattle gay rights people on his side and got away with not paying child support ever even though he had a six figure salary. I know a thing or two about being a Christian women facing tough choices for my children - I am also a woman of faith and was an active member of a care ministry for single parents in my church during those years I was alone raising my children.

Many people from the small mill town in southern VA judged me, as you are now judging Ms. Palin, for my choices. I want you to know how damaging I think your article was on Gov Palin and though it won you a spot on O'Reilly's show, which you seemed to be quite pleased with yourself over, YOU were the one who insults all intelligent, articulate and professional women of faith with your politically correct rhetoric.

I listened to much of the political activity this year from the Dems to the Republicans and found that the ultimate winners are both pathetic - Barack Obama, a virtual unknown and only selected by his party because he is BLACK - I watched in horror as the super delegates took the election away from the rightful winner - Hillary Clinton - all because she has remained true to her faith and commitments - staying married to Bill - my gosh, why have you not honored her in your columns to state that had she dumped him, she would be the party's candidate? but instead she stands by her principles and remains married to him - a cheater and liar and certainly unworthy of her - and you say nothing - and she is one of your own! but Hillary, while an articulate, educated, intelligent and experienced woman could not be my choice because she stands for big government and I don't BUT I was willing to concede that just because she was better for the job than our other choices were going to be...

then, we have John McCain, certainly not my first choice but he did a rather amazing thing last week when he added Sarah Palin to his ticket. He showed me he is a maverick and he stands for change. While Chris Matthews gets chills down his spine for Obama, tears of joy ran down my cheeks as I listened in the car to Gov Palin's speech on the radio.

She was speaking for me - a working mom - a HARD working mom, who has gone after corruption, who wants change in WA (as all of us outside the beltway do), AND she is a SOLDIER'S MOTHER...she knows how I feel and how so many of us feel about our sons and daughters being overseas fighting a war...she was and is very real to me.

and then today, I hear all this crap coming from the media about her daughter, her inexperience...and then I read your column...

No you'd rather attack Gov. Palin, a mother, a SOLDIER'S MOTHER, as I also am, - a woman who has had to make difficult choices

a strong woman

a smart woman

a qualified woman

she is far more qualified than Barack who has only been in public office at a national level a short time and has never run anything but his campaign

oh and yes was ONLY nominated because he is BLACK...

I am not a racist...it is as obvious to ME as it seems the reasons McCain chose Gov Palin is to you - she is a WOMAN

Thank God.

PS the reason you failed at the network is pretty easy - you weren't tough enough - no mettle - I recognized in your words a pattern that many women who have not succeeded in life have used on those of us that have - you put them down by saying they are attractive, or dress nice - because the truth is they are simply smarter and better at what they do...than you could ever be.

Posted by: Laurie Malm | September 3, 2008 9:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, the first paragraph of your article was a little confusing to me. Why wouldn't McCain make a VP pick that would help him become president? But than again you're in DC and I'm not.

Than your article becomes hateful and what's sad about that is you're not even aware of it.

The more comments likes yours are made by the left, the more you make women like my wife mad. And my wife is not mad at you but at Obama.

Keep up the good work, you should be on the Mcain's campaign payroll.

Posted by: John McIntyre | September 3, 2008 9:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just a little jealous Sally? Grow up!

Posted by: Tim | September 3, 2008 9:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess according to Sally Quinn its OK for women Like Sarah Palin to have a job, it just can't be a good job!!

Posted by: Bob | September 3, 2008 9:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess according to Sally Quinn its OK for women Like Sarah Palin to have a job, it just can't be a good job!!

Posted by: Bob | September 3, 2008 9:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear undecided Republican voter, your not , never were. Elizabeth said it best, you dems are really scared.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 8:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I would like to comment on "SINGLEMOM'S" post. I could have written it, so Ma'am you are not alone. What everyone on here fails to see is this cretin who calls herself a journalist is an officer's kid. Her mother was probably in the PTA and Officer's Wives Club. Unless you have been subjected to these women and their pathetic husbands for 28 years you could never understand this mentality. Nor would you want to. Just feel sorry for all of us terrible mothers serving our country and our families, just without the whole demeaning anyone who gets in our way. This woman is a pathetic joke and I hope the TV keeps her off the screen. I need to go vomit.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 8:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin's daughter is pregnant and Quinn is upset and mean. Biden's daughter is arrested in Chicago on AUG 03,08, and Quinn says nothing. LA Times, page A-14, 04 AUG 08, what a bias.

Posted by: Biden's daughter arrested | September 3, 2008 8:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms.Quinn, I understand college educated women are concerned about our soldiers, concerned about the earth, concerned about the enemies of our country, now you are concerned about a woman you don't even know. Why are you concerned about Sarah Palins children, and you are probably one who support the murder of unborn babies? You people need to stop harrassing people and get your own lives together with your own consciences. This woman Sarah is more of a woman than you or your cohorts, just for the plain fact she believes in everyone's right to live even a child with down syndrome. Go back to your thoughts and your comments and maybe you will realize you don't have a clue as to what value every every human life has. If you support the safety of all humans then Where are you with the unborn Children? Your comments mean nothing to a person who knows God and Creation. You, until you change your own life will never understand why Sarah is an important part of this world, your kind are willing to stand by and watch a beautiful world go down the toilet without any morals. I will pray for you and your cohorts that one day you will care about every life not just the ones you choose to care about. McCain made his decision I guess just to keep you animals off of a decent human being.
Clean up your own life, take care of your own, and let Sarah worry about her family. If you are so concerned about our country then why are you voting for a man whose background is so dirty and can't tell enough lies to cover it up.
God Bless you and yours
God Bless's America not you!
God Forgives all of with his grace, maybe he will forgive you for standing behind the murder of babies.

Posted by: Lynda Richardson | September 3, 2008 8:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Sally you are just - simply negative!

Palin is refreshing...so what of she doesnt follow your recipe exactly as to what a woman should be like?

you need to put the claws away.. let her be
and support the fact that she was even nominated!

The glass celing will never be broken with dissention in the ranks that smacks of jealousy
Where is the freedom to be... and accomplish whatever we can dream? Why should this be limited to only Obama- whos salay I am paying for years now as my senator-- all he has done is campaign on my tab....

Posted by: irena | September 3, 2008 8:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Shame on you. Let Sarah Palin speak first, give her a chance. I am a working Mother and Grandmother and I do not feel I neglected my children in anyway. What a breathe of fresh air to have someone not caught up in the Washington quagmire.

As a proud American, I am going to wait and see, listen and review what the candidates say and then I will make my decision.

Posted by: Lady from Florida | September 3, 2008 8:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

A woman can't do half the job a man can. Let alone a woman with a retard son. The question you have to ask yourself is if I am talking about Sally Quinn or Sarah Palin. Not that there is any difference.

Obama 08

Posted by: Josh | September 3, 2008 8:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am certainly disappointed in your article about Sarah Palin. I think it speaks volumnes that she and her "first" husband are still together having a family after all these years!!! My goodness, how very refreshing in this day and age. I was thrilled at the selection of this Gov. from Alaska with the terrific record she has and the many accomplishments she has made. An 80% approval rating....would not any public servant desire that? Shame on you, and others, for bringing up the daughter's pregnancy. This is a parent's nightmare, but not a parent's responsibility. This young couple will have a long road in front of them and you have made it public and more difficult. Shame on you!!!! This really has nothing to do with her being a candidate for the Vice President. I am so amazed that you can hold your head up and smile as you just did on Fox. Terrible journalism, sad really.
A former Democrat, Carmen Behrens

Posted by: C. L. Behrens | September 3, 2008 8:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks for the article, Ms Quinn. You certainly hit the nail on the head and summarized everything I have felt about this poor VP pick.

And thanks to McCain's dementia in naming Palin to the vice-presidency, I regret I must vote Democrat this time.

God Help us all.

Posted by: Undecided Female Republican Voter | September 3, 2008 8:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

All I can say is that I wish feminists had so much concern about a mother's involvement in the life of a child who is considering abortion. It seems that the fight on the part of feminists has been to REMOVE a mother's influence. Why else would states have to deal with bills on a parent's right to be notified? But all of a sudden you are concerned that Sarah Palin can't be a proper mother to her 17-year-old daughter. Again, would you care if she had any input on an abortion consideration, especially if she wanted to talk the daughter out of it? Besides, once the daughter is married, Sarah Palin will have put her daughter's hand into the hand of her new husband and her mothering, for all intents and purposes, will be over. She'll be a grandmother, and being a grandmother hasn't stopped Nancy Pelosi being Speaker of the House (and she is in the line of succession, isn't she?). But I must admit this concern for mothers being fully available for mothering is very encouraging. I just wonder what you think of Hillary Clinton's busyness as a mother when Chelsea was at home. After all, she was the co-president, and from what I can tell, was preoccupied with matters of state and policy, more so than with matters of the home.

Also, the oldest son is going into the Army, so in a short time Sarah Palin will have only three children at home. Is this an acceptable number? How many women in government or the media have three children and have their attention diverted elsewhere? I thought women were supposed to be able to do it all, REGARDLESS OF THE JOB. I guess we know now that women with children should be excluded from certain positions. But didn't Queen Victoria have a whole slew of kids when she presided over the British Empire? She managed somehow, and, as far as I can tell, history hasn't slammed her for her kids or for her job performance being affected by them.

So give Sarah Palin a chance to prove herself before you write her off.

Carole Parma

Posted by: Carole Parma | September 3, 2008 8:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks for the article, Ms Quinn. You certainly hit the nail on the head and summarized everything I have felt about this poor VP pick.

And thanks to McCain's dementia in naming Palin to the vice-presidency, I regret I must vote Democrat this time.

God Help us all.

Posted by: Undecided Female Republican Voter | September 3, 2008 8:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks for the article, Ms Quinn. You certainly hit the nail on the head and summarized everything I have felt about this poor VP pick.

And thanks to McCain's dementia in naming Palin to the vice-presidency, I regret I must vote Democrat this time.

God Help us all.

Posted by: Undecided Female Republican Voter | September 3, 2008 8:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks for the article, Ms Quinn. You certainly hit the nail on the head and summarized everything I have felt about this poor VP pick.

And thanks to McCain's dementia in naming Palin to the vice-presidency, I regret I must vote Democrat this time.

God Help us all.

Posted by: Undecided Female Republican Voter | September 3, 2008 8:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is amazing that the rules when entering a comment ask that one does not violate another rights ssuch as religion, race and gender!! Well , how is it that Sally Quinn is violating Sarah Palin gender rights? As a Catholic, educated at Georgetown, Sally Quinn has failed the women of this country. Women are equal Sally!!

Posted by: michael lynch | September 3, 2008 8:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WOW, You guys really are scared! This is going to be fun!!

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 3, 2008 8:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Shame on you Sally. I am an independant voter and have never read your work before. Your article and your appearance with Bill O'Riley show you to be very self serving and unfair for not giving Palin a chance to prove herself to the general public. YOU try to discredit her for being a MOTHER Shame on YOU Shame on YOU

Posted by: John, Redding CA | September 3, 2008 8:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Pretty sad article. Also, you need to update your photo

Posted by: M Kirby | September 3, 2008 8:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Let me try to understand your position. Sarah Palin is a woman and a mother, therefore she is incapable of performing the duties of vice president.

Are you saying that the glass ceiling should only apply to Republican women?

I read the other comments looking for support for this column...I quit after the first 100 or so negative comments.

Best of luck with your new career.

Posted by: Rodney S Taylor | September 3, 2008 8:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find your opinions of Sarah Palin to be un-Christianly and I am shocked at your bigoted, narrow minded take on what women are or should be allowed to handle based on your personal interpretation of the Gospel. Women, by the grace of God, are strong and talented in ways men are not. And by that grace we manage homes, children, grandchildren, aging parents,and work — even if that is the Vice-President of the USA. The balancing includes all the good and bad that happens. You obviously base your references of skills and talents on your own experiences — which must be lacking. I suggest you pray a little more and be careful about judging — lest you be judged. Oh, too late!

Posted by: Kelly Zap | September 3, 2008 8:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally I will pray for your salvation from the left wing radicals in America who have sold you a bill of goods. Seems like Satin has done a fine job in raising you my dear.
Palin is more qualified than your OBAMY is! He gave a speach. And? A cocain user. And? Lets see that is it. No he is a clean guy per Senator Joe.
You have no values Sally your are just a wac job leftest!

Posted by: Scott | September 3, 2008 8:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's amazing that someone like you knows everything about another person like "Sarah Palin." It's people like you that imply you know everything about a subject. i.e. On Bill O'Reiily show you said you knew she was not completely vetted. How would you know? It's people like you that spread rumours where you expound on a subject, without having all the facts. It's really a shame that you conduct yourself this way.

Smarten up woman and do your research prior to publishing untrue facts to the world.

Posted by: Bill Becker | September 3, 2008 8:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
You narrow minded Liberal wacko. I just saw you on O'Reilly touting the mothers role in a family.
Yet most liberals like yourself promote gay
and lesbian parenting. I don't have anything
against them, but PLEASE make up your mind. You
liberals are just running scared because the
Republicans put forth a qualified capable candidate for Vice President and your dream team
doesn't look so bright anymore. By the way as my mother used to say "I hope your face doesn't freeze that way" lose the pout!! It amazes me that women can't stick together, we have to lower ourselves to jealousy and back biting.

Posted by: Pat Sherry | September 3, 2008 8:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

sally quinn; you are another jealous female who is angry about sarah palin because you assume to know why she was chosen according to your own sick & twisted subjective viewpoint; who do you think you are? Do NOT attempt to speak for any other "American" woman with your pathetic opinion; you are meaningless in the grand scheme of things: you are the FOOL. Get off your high horse. Have lunch with Keith Olberman and then drop off the planet, broadzilla.

Posted by: cary allen | September 3, 2008 8:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Shame on you Quinn. Because you failed you want her to fail. How can you have it both ways? I am woman hear me roar but when I do look out I am a bad person. Since when did a liberal journalist on the WP worry about family values. McCain scored a home run.

Go home Quinn you are a loser.

Posted by: Michael Demma | September 3, 2008 8:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You should be ashamed to print this crap! I was on the fence and NOW I can proudly say my vote and many others , friends , collegues are voting for Palin/McCain!! She is a Smart,Confident, Beautiful, Mother, Wife..And she will be a Great Role Model to young women in the United States! I do not know why the press is coming at her, the reason , she is a threat, she is not judgemental!!She will stand up to anyone , she has proven that, and will continue to!! Go Sarah!! Knock em dead, you got my support!!

Posted by: This article is a Piece of Garbage | September 3, 2008 8:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

Could you write a stupid article like this once once a day please? The more you write, the madder normal women will become and the more of us will defect the democratic party!
I am a democrat and I am voting for John McCain.
GO SARAH!

Posted by: Sondra Bouchard | September 3, 2008 8:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article is horrible. How dare Ms. Quinn judge another after her track record.

Shame on you.

Posted by: What gives you the right? | September 3, 2008 8:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is a bonafide idiot!

Posted by: E Williams | September 3, 2008 8:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You should be thrown over the prison wall with no lubricant.

Posted by: Up Yours C**t! | September 3, 2008 8:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally has no clue, She is just jealous that Sarah can run a family and country at the same time.

Posted by: Runningwolf | September 3, 2008 8:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn will burn in hell for eternity for her attack on Gov palin

Posted by: tony | September 3, 2008 8:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You jealous old blonde skank. Souunds like your lealous of an attactive successful woman

Posted by: Russ | September 3, 2008 8:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: aaron | September 3, 2008 8:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
You are amazing! How can you speak for women. Given your logic Obama's own Mother should have aborted him. She after all was unmarried and 17 when she was pregnant with the democratic nominee. Think next time and don't speak for working women or any women who has multiple children, career and can actually manage to have a life outside of the home.

Posted by: erin carroll | September 3, 2008 8:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you speak from both sides of your mouth.

Posted by: Rightway | September 3, 2008 8:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Governor Palin is the ONLY candidate with CEO experience; how does that qualify for "no experience?"

If Gov. Palin's first name was "George" or "Henry" or "Patrick" NO ONE would question the dedication of "his" parenting or would be troubled or wondering about "his" being able to handle the high pressure job of vice-president while "he" had a four-month-old special needs baby or a pregnant seventeen-year- old at home.

So my question is - why are so many in the media arguing against her position? Is it because she's a woman and the media thinks a woman's place is in the home? Or is it because she's a CONSERVATIVE woman who has a chance of becoming the next vice-president and the media doesn't want a conservative White House?

Posted by: Linda J. Perron | September 3, 2008 7:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Since when is "Washington Insider" something good for a resume?

Posted by: Joe Pekorney | September 3, 2008 7:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The two words in your title say it all--"Pregnancy PROBLEM," and Governor Palin is not even the one who is pregnant.

What I find most offensive about this missive is the transparent jealousy thinly disguised as "concern." Governor Sarah Palin is essentially debunking 30 years of feminist myth: that children are an inconvenience, and unless you discard them, you can never achieve your goals. She has pursued dreams and achieved them, and is poised to do so much more! Yet she still embraces a full life with a husband, plenty of children, and everyone in the mix, including the great state of Alaska thrives. To quote an old feminist ad line: "We've come a long way, baby!"

A pregnant teenage daughter is no proof of neglect, and having come from a large family, the older ones DO take care of the younger ones, and most times gladly--that's the benefit of having more than two or three kids--but that would be something women and men who don't live the Beltway life would understand.

Get your head out of your elitist backside, Sally--feminism and especially evangelicals are no longer defined by you people--Sarah Palin is giving it a new definition, thank God!

Posted by: Jennifer Oliver O'Connell | September 3, 2008 7:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Here's the difference Sally. You failed because you had NO experience. Sarah Palin has run a state for the last two years. Obama has run nothing. Also, would you carp on a man who had a similar family situation? Or is a Republican female too threatening to you? I really doubt that you have any true concern for her family--just for promoting your agenda.

Posted by: Shaman | September 3, 2008 6:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What are you on the far left so afraid of? If she is such a bad pick, why not let the Republican ticket go down in flames. It seems jealousy of a highly successful and attractive woman has gotten the better of you. Nevertheless, keep it up, you are just driving more independent women to her.

Posted by: Blair | September 3, 2008 6:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Using Sally's Logic, Joe Biden needs to stay home to help with the grandchildren. He could teach them plagiarism. And, if he stayed home the taxpayers could save the $350 he spends each day on Amtrak showing us that he is just a common man.

Posted by: Sidney | September 3, 2008 6:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Using Sally's Logic, Joe Biden needs to stay home to help with the grandchildren. He could teach them plagiarism. And, if he stayed home the taxpayers could save the $350 he spends each day on Amtrak showing us that he is just a common man.

Posted by: Sidney | September 3, 2008 6:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Using Sally's Logic, Joe Biden needs to stay home to help with the grandchildren. He could teach them plagiarism. And, if he stayed home the taxpayers could save the $350 he spends each day on Amtrak showing us that he is just a common man.

Posted by: Sidney | September 3, 2008 6:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Using Sally's Logic, Joe Biden needs to stay home to help with the grandchildren. He could teach them plagiarism. And, if he stayed home the taxpayers could save the $350 he spends each day on Amtrak showing us that he is just a common man.

Posted by: Sidney | September 3, 2008 6:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My, my, my. Your full rules certainly do protect the probable sensitivities of your writers. Never mind that Ms. Quinn has no problem using this space to personally attack the Governor of Alaska. I find myself wondering how in the world you and your agents think for a second that you decide for us and our potential leaders how many children one should or should not have. Was there a problem for you with Joe and Rose Kennedy? Robert Kennedy and Ethel? Oh, I think not. Do you have any clue how many people out here in the real world are consistently offended by such pontifications? How dare you, Ms. Quinn, spend any time at all with your pen, when you should be spending 100 per cent of your time tending your own challenged child? That's your stated standard for Sarah Palin. What, you're special and exempt from your own position?

One wonders who you people think you are. Worse, I wonder who you think WE are. I could not care less whether you print this. That's not my purpose here. I do indeed want you to know that you and your attitudes make my anger incendiary. Out here where we live real lives, we have just about had enough of you. This enormously talented woman is, sooner or later, going to clean your clocks. And you won't see it coming. That is how good she is, and how poor you are.

Posted by: Barbara Ayars | September 3, 2008 6:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

DO YOU REALIZE HOW ABSOLUTELY STUPID YOU SOUND WHEN TALKING ABOUT SARAH PALIN? DID YOU EVER FINISH GRADE SCHOOL?

Posted by: KAREN | September 3, 2008 5:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am so sick and tired of left wing loud mouths like Sally Quinn who think that because they've been hanging around inside the beltway their whole lives, they know better. GOVERNOR Palin has more experience that O'Bama..PERIOD! She's the Governor of a state with a $50 Billion dollar budget. That's not up for debate..it's a fact that anyone can look up. Ms. Quinn has no problem with a Presidential candidate who has no experience, and a former President whose foreign policy included doing nothing about several terrorist attacks against our Military..ie: USS Cole...BILL CLINTON DID NOTHING! And now leftist Sally Quinn is offended because John McCain, who she would never vote for in the first place picks a Woman who doesn't fit the mold. Give me a break. This whole column makes Ms. Quinn and those like her look like the hypocrites that they are.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 5:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This posting, as well as your recent interview with Soledad O’Brien, touting Sara Palin’s inability to balance the role of Vice Presidency with the demands of family is just plain short sited. You are in no position to speak for her and certainly do not speak for me or the many Evangelical women I know who work. We are not all subservient and incapable as you tried so diligently tried to paint with one brush. It is getting increasingly frustrating - all the labels, judgments and sweeping generalizations, not based in fact, that are being used to create so many false realities. It's just irresponsible journalism.

Posted by: Terri Christiansen | September 3, 2008 5:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How sad your column is. You must be being paid a bunch to lynch a person in print, when you don't know her, her family or the circumstances of her being where she is now. If her daughter is pregnant, it is none of your damn business!
If your daughter is pregnant, it is none of my business! Leave it alone. This is yelliow journalism. If this is all you can write about, then pack up your computer and go home to YOUR family!

Posted by: maryan | September 3, 2008 5:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well done Sally, you are a good little liberal lapdog,
have a treat.

Posted by: Hugo Chavez | September 3, 2008 5:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It sounds to me like you are either JEALOUS or afraid.!!!!!!

Posted by: Colleen Wagoner | September 3, 2008 5:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally has lost one reader here. I am in shock over what you have said about Sarah P. You are so out of line here that I don't even know what to say. You have made me re-think this whole republican ticket. How many other women have you insulted with your article? You have pushed me over the side. I won't be reading you ever again.

Posted by: ann | September 3, 2008 5:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

I know you're real smart and refined, but here's my take on this. Women have been dumping their children and infants into daycare centers for years. I know that some absolutely have to, but I believe that with a bit of doing without (like a second Volvo in the driveway) and using Grandma it CAN be done--I did it and worked professionally.

But all of a sudden along comes Palin and these women are concerned for her children???--that is a joke.

I am a drug counselor and I see the results of this dumping of unbonded children into daycare; they're invariably on Ritalin or the like and diagnosed as bipolar etc etc. Then comes addiction.
If they had been raised by parents who made sacrifices of time, I believe this wouldn't be happening as much. Now I try to help them(parent them and give them hope). I am very busy needless to say.

This appears to be a double standard. Sincerely, Marla

Posted by: Marla | September 3, 2008 5:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am furious with you sally! How DARE you disqualify a woman for a position of that importance and imply that she cannot be both a successful mother and a Vice President! How did you feel when a man suggested that you might be better off at home than in the work force? Or that your son Josiah Quinn Crowninshield Bradlee needed you at home so you should not work OR that maybe your son Josiah should have been aborted because of his Velo-cardio-facial syndrome? I am through with the democratic party FOREVER!

Posted by: Donna B | September 3, 2008 5:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As the single mother of four children I have had to support myself. I chose a career in a male dominated field and for over 25 years have experienced all forms of discrimination and harassment for choosing to work in this field. I am still working in the same career and still facing daily discriminations, regardless of how old my children are.

You, Sally Quinn, join that group of men I have been facing every day. You, Sally Quinn, are one of those I battle to overcome every day. You, Sally Quinn, carry your own grudges and attempt to throw onto others of your own gender. You, Sally Quinn, are another reason why women will not get ahead in this world. You, Sally Quinn, are an embarrassment.

I only came to this website because I heard about this article on the radio. I am disgusted. Do your research, Sally. Palin has been on the radar for quite some time now. Not that you would know it or recognize it because you are too busy denigrating a woman for being successful. You would never have written this column using this tone or judgment were the VP choice a man in the same position.

I was neither drinking the Obamanation kool-aid nor was I on the McCain train. I know my choice now. You have helped me make my mind up when I have been struggling. A woman who can achieve the governors position maintaining an 80-90% approval rating with many accomplishments ...who also has to battle discrimination on a daily basis. That is one strong woman.

Posted by: SingleMom | September 3, 2008 5:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You wrote that you were angry with McCain's pick because it seemed calculated. News Flash - ALL VP picks are calculated. Do you think Obama chose Biden because he was truly the best candidate or because he might be able to appeal to Evangelical voters that are alledgedly 'in play' this election (despite all evidence to the contrary).

I have been on the fence this election, but the attack reporting from the left is slowly putting me into the McCain camp. The insinuations that a woman with children can't effectively have a career, that a candidate's stance on abortion is an open license to slander her teenage daughter, and that conservative values = submissive slave are not only offensive, they set the feminist movement back 50 years.

Posted by: Jennifer Gribble | September 3, 2008 5:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you liberal shill. So, according to you, McCain should have said, "I really want to ask Sarah Palin, a wonderfully qualified woman to run on the ticket with me, but she needs to stay home with her kids so I passed her over." Yeah. That would have gone over real well with the chattering class. Go buy a clue . . .

Posted by: Brian | September 3, 2008 4:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm a woman and I do not think a women can be expected to be able to raise a family and work a job that critical.

Obama 08

Posted by: Weundra | September 3, 2008 4:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

i think sally quinn is jealous of Sarah Palin because of her qualities the average person can relate.
Our troops leave their families and serve and those families sacrifice for their country. Maybe Sarah Palin's family believes that they are willing to sacrifice for her and service to her country.

If you had a child with special needs did you give up your day job. No. Pelosi did not give up her job or her career goals.

Who is quinn to judge how Sarah Palin should lead her life with her family. What qualifications give her that right. None. But quinn and pelosi feel that because of their god like insight should make all decision for all people and their judgement should rule. That is why pelosi and the democratic congress has a 9% vote of confidence white Sarah Palin has an 80% vote of confidence from her state.

Posted by: cheryl brick | September 3, 2008 4:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
You call the chioce of Sarah Palin "cynical and calculating". Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! This is one of the most cynical hit-pieces I've read in quite a while. Gov. Palin has no foreign policy experience? What about Senator Obama? (by the way - no, his kindergarten class in Indonesia doesn't count.) You ask how McCain can call Obama inexperienced - McCain can, and should, level that charge _because it is valid_! You fret about what would happen (God forbid) if something happened to a President McCain. By the exact same logic, why don't you fret about what would happen if (God forbid) Senator Obama was actually sworn in?

To intimate that Gov. Palin is somehow neglecting her children is outrageous, hysterical caterwauling. It shows your "elite liberal" status -- it shows that you are seriously detached from the ebb and flow of life for most of us "normal folks".

Is Sarah Palin ready to be President? Well, she's one heck of a lot more qualified than Obama is. I'd rather have the Governor of the largest state in the Union running the federal government than some "community organizer" that thinks a retired bomber is a "cool dude".

Posted by: Jill | September 3, 2008 4:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn, as usual, got everything completely wrong; but what else do you expect from this liberal twit.

Posted by: D. Alan Thompson | September 3, 2008 4:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You're wrong.......
I have had the opportunity to live in the midst of Southern Baptist, and Methodist and plain ole Southern women for the past two years. This being from California (born, raised and having lived over 56 years there and Catholic, I might add)until retiring and moving to Chattanooga, TN. Having said this, you are so wrong if you think evagelical women are submissive. I have never seen such sharp eyed and potentially sharp tongued powerful women in my life. Please be aware, this does not deminish the men by any means. I'm simply letting you know you do not know of which to pontificate.

Posted by: Colleen Cavin | September 3, 2008 4:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn,

Your comment, "Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil. Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well" simply supports the archaic thinking of the "evil white man" who has done his best to keep women down.

For years "men" have questioned this very thing of women and for years we've listened to women activists assuring us this wasn't the case; that women are better and stronger mentally than men give them credit.

We've listened to activists "educating" us on how women have been and are being penalized for wanting a career and a family. Well, here we have Sarah Palin, who one would think would become the poster child for the cause, and yet you, Ms. Quinn, are the first to suggest that she - and presumably women in general - are not capable of handling "distractions".

Ms. Quinn, if Mrs. Palin can't handle the distractions, what makes us think that women federal judges can, women senators and women in congress can, women police chiefs can, women astronauts can, and so forth. Well Ms. Quinn, as a white male American, I chose side with competent women who have faced and continue to face personal adversity and continue on to succeed.

As you can see by the messages on this board, your comments are not well received and off the mark with most Americans - those the mainstream media doesn't think exist.

Posted by: Ben Armato | September 3, 2008 4:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow - what a sexist piece of garbage you wrote. Disgusting partisanship on parade.

Posted by: Dan Mosqueda | September 3, 2008 4:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn, you are an ardent Obama supporter and that's fine. What's not okay is for you to use your position as a nationally recognized journalist to influence people at large with you idealogical based veiws, as you did so swimmingly on CBS this am. Your non-sensical remarks about Palin being past the "tipping point" of being effective in office even offended my liberal school teacher wife. Shame on you, get it right Sally. Find a real point, if there are any, to discredit Mrs. Palin, instead of marginalizing your own creditability. You made yourself the look like like someones lacky. Biased reporting
is a propaganda tool no matter which side of the aisle uses it.

Posted by: scott l | September 3, 2008 4:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This comment is regarding Sally Quinn's article titled: Palin's Pregnancy Problem

Why does Sally Quinn call herself a journalist? The media coverage of Gov. Palin has finally proven to the American public just how bias the media is. Sally Quinn, correct your title to reflect what you really are: an " activist-journalist."

Posted by: Maria | September 3, 2008 4:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, you have it precisely wrong. She was chosen because she helps Sen. McCain convince voters that he is the real change Washington is looking for. To condescendingly suggest that she was chosen "just because she's a woman" and a sop to the evangelical base (after all it was your paper that called them "poor, uneducated and easy to command")is more a reflection of your ignorance and arrogance than her bad hair.

Your column insults, and reflects the panic among the wine and brie set over a brilliant choice by Senator McCain of someone that real people who live in "flyover states" can relate to, and connect with. Fact is, you like Washington just the way it is, and she's just not acceptable to you and your effete ilk. Get over it.

Posted by: bucknelldad | September 3, 2008 4:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, you have it precisely wrong. She was chosen because she helps Sen. McCain convince voters that he is the real change Washington is looking for. To condescendingly suggest that she was chosen "just because she's a woman" and a sop to the evangelical base (after all it was your paper that called them "poor, uneducated and easy to command")

Your column insults, and reflects the panic among the wine and brie set over a brilliant choice by Senator McCain of someone that real people who live in "flyover states" can relate to, and connect with. Fact is, you like Washington just the way it is, and she's just not acceptable to you and your effete ilk. Get over it.

Posted by: bucknelldad | September 3, 2008 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Get real Sally! You are really reaching on this one. Are you not concerned for the male candidates and their ability to meet the needs of their children? Or is Obama a pay grade above meeting these needs? Are you saying that no women should hold down this job unless she has no children at home? What about female Physician's, Police Officers and Soldiers who have children? As for her experience, did you raise the same questions when Bill Clinton was running? Were you opposed to Jimmy Carter when he ran for office? No, you just oppose a female who is a conservative! By the way the image of a woman submitting to a husband who loves her the way Jesus loves the Church is to show who God is, not to make the man or the woman feel better or worse about themself.

Posted by: Paul | September 3, 2008 3:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why have you been so quick to condemn Sarah Palin?Obama hasn't been home in 17 or more months to spend quality time with his family. Why is there no comment on his actions? Nancy Pelosi raised six children and remained a Congresswoman for the entire time. Why no criticism of Nancy? Bill Clinton chased women all over America. Why no critism? John Edwards caught in an affair. No critism. Why not? The answer is as plain as the nose on your face....... It is unthinkable to besmearch a Democrat comrade, no matter the severity of his or her offenses or shortcomings. But by golly, you take no prisoners when attempting to crucify Republicans. How did America get this way? The Democrat hate for Republicans is beyond my powers of comprehension.

Posted by: David Goode | September 3, 2008 3:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
Unless you are an evangelical don't pretend you speak for them or know what they are thinking about how John McCain's choice of a running mate will sit. It doesn't matter how much hands on parenting a child gets. Once they reach an age of independence they will make their own choices. We, as parents can only hope we've created a sound foundation for our children to help them make what we as parents feel are the right choices. Some make mistakes like Bristol, but what is important here is what happens after the mistake. Did Bristol try to get rid of the "mistake" by having an abortion? No she took the high road and owned up to her mistake and took responsibility. And what did her family do. They supported her in her decision showing that no matter what they still love her. The foundation was laid to help Bristol make what I think an evangelical would consider the right choice after a mistake.

On the matter of Gov Palin's expierence - You said Barbara Bush thought they were ready for VP by all the expeience her husband had but they found out "nothing can prepare you for the criticism and scrutiny of being in the White House". If nothing can prepare you, what is your point about Gov Palin's experience. I am an Alaskan and have followed Gov Palin's actions since she routed out ethical problems in the Alaksa Oil and Gas committee she served on and the Alaska Attorney General's office. From what I have seen of her since taking the highes office in the state of Alaska, she is not beholden to anyone including her own political party when it comes to doing the right thing. She knew the oil tax legislation that had been approved by our state legislature prior to her taking office was rotten to the core with corruption and bribes. BTW 3 state legilatures are presenly sitting in prison and one is awaiting trial. She brought it back to the table against the wishes of her party and of course the oil companies. But because she had the people of Alaska behind her she got what was right and just for the people of Alaska even though it was unpopular with her party and the oil companies. When you are fighting multiple corporations that are raking in billions of dollars every quarter and win, I'd say that in and of itself is plenty of experience in running this country. After-all. She's not running for president, it's vice president. It's sad the majority of you media folks already have John McCain the the grave and he hasn't even taken office yet.

Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2008 3:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I believe your comments on Sarah Palin and the Southern Baptist female church members were completely out of line and totally wrong.

Sarah Palin has shown herself to be a strong and intelligent woman. What is the difference in her working with 4 children at home and the CNN (Clinton New Network) reporter ( that has 4 children UNDER NINE YEARS OF AGE)that interviewed you?

I am member of the Southern Baptist Church, been married for 47 years - I have never deferred to my husband in any decision - we make them jointly - I have managed my own finances for my entire life - our bank accounts are separate. I worked in a job that was considered a 'male job only' long before you married someone that could give you a job.

I have not contributed to any campaign this year because I did not like the way either party was headed but after watching Sarah Palin, I immediately contributed to John McCain's campaign and will do so again.

Posted by: Norma Johnson | September 3, 2008 3:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are so wrong.....I was born, raised and lived all of my life in California. I worked for 37 years, raised my daughter, retired and moved to Chattanooga TN. Certainly well within the Bible Belt. I have worked a part time job for two years which gives me the opportunity to come in contact with about 20 people a day in a one-on-one relationship. With that said, I am here to tell you that the Southern Baptist (and the Methodist -- heck, all Southern women, I might add, evangelical or not)are some of the strongest sharp eyed, and potentially sharped tongued women you can imagine. They may claim submission to their spouses but everyone knows clearly who is in charge. This does not at all chip at the stature of the Southern male. It simply means the women are not what you believe them to be. Therefore, again, you are wrong.

Posted by: Colleen Cavin | September 3, 2008 3:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are so wrong.....I was born, raised and lived all of my life in California. I worked for 37 years, raised my daughter, retired and moved to Chattanooga TN. Certainly well within the Bible Belt. I have worked a part time job for two years which gives me the opportunity to come in contact with about 20 people a day in a one-on-one relationship. With that said, I am here to tell you that the Southern Baptist (and the Methodist -- heck, all Southern women, I might add, evangelical or not)are some of the strongest sharp eyed, and potentially sharped tongued women you can emagine. They may claim submission to their spouses but everyone knows clearly who is in charge. This does not at all chip at the stature of the Southern male. It simply means the women are not what you believe them to be. Therefore, again, you are wrong.

Posted by: Colleen Cavin | September 3, 2008 3:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Do you ever re-read your writing? How did this newspaper ever give you license to write to such a broad base?

Since I doubt you read your own stuff, I quote: "My first reaction was shock. Then anger. John McCain chose a running mate SIMPLY BECAUSE (emphasis mine) she is a woman and one who appealed to the Republican's conservative evangelical base. Now, with news that Palin's 17-year-old unmarried daughter is pregnant, McCain's pick may not even find support among "family values" voters." Pretty sexist old broad, aren't you?

Suggestion: You pontificating media hypes ("types" is a misnomer and quite oxymoron-ish) might consider backing off until there have been a few debates and exchanges between the two VP candidates. Right now your "guy" with 30+ years Washington Beltway experience lends me to believe he's so far removed from ordinary grassroots politics as one can get...and I think, based on many, many comments Senator "Motormouth" (my term) has made and I've read I think a good homespun woman just might do some real damage control.

How wonderful it just might be if instead of pulling away from an interview with Larry King she actually did the interview and in the process slammed him flat by answering some questions with, "That is the dumbest thing I ever expected you to ask...can't you do better? But, I'll lower myself to your freshman standards with my reply....".

Lady, didn't you learn that to assume when broken into syllables means to make an ass-of-you-and-me? Quit it and stick to the facts, if you know how.

Posted by: Dr. Scott McVittie | September 3, 2008 3:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Few Lines A Few More Times For Old Times

Less said and more done
She is light and bright
Do not give all your heart to one
Do not be consumed with hate
She is my love and liberty
Special and warming the heart
I hardly knew you
You taught me well
So all is not lost
With Love
There is a way and a light
The enemy is in the dark

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 3, 2008 3:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally how many abortions have you had. It sounds like since you are so against Palin and her kids. You don't know what it is like to have kids because you abort them. That is your type of sex education. Have all the sex you want, and if you get pregnant just abort the useless baby. Is that what liberals are all about...heartless abortion pusher....so how many times do you just go out and have sex for fun and then turn around and get an abortion

Posted by: Steve | September 3, 2008 2:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, I appreciate the way you've tried to cover up your out and out 'hatred' of McCain's choice of a running mate with "This is nothing against Palin,...", but overall your article is dripping with your anger and frustration. I'm sure that before you knew who had been selected as the VP candidate, you thought that the presidency was in the bag.

As a conservative voter, registered as a Republican, I vote for the candidate that best reflects MY values and convictions. All of us SHOULD do that, but I know that many will vote for the Party no matter who is running.
Personally, I had resigned myself to vote for John McCain because his values were "closer" to mine than those of Mr. Obama, and that is what I have heard from many others as well. With the selection of Sarah Palin, whom I, as apparently most of the country, have never heard of, I now have certainty that my vote for John McCain will definitely be the right one!

I must add that I have never been so disappointed in the media...and ESPECIALLY the women of the media, as I am now! Women who have shoved feminism down our throats for more than 30 years are now showing their true colors, and where their hearts definitely are not. I am proud to be an American, and I'm thankful that we have the freedom of speech and the press, but my confidence in the mainstream media and many women that I have admired will never be the same.

Oh, and by the way, I am a Christian that is a member of a Southern Baptist Church. I think that you are forgetting that Christianity is about love and forgiveness. I know that I speak for many as I say that I am very proud of the way that the Palin family has chosen to deal with the life issues that have come their way. Sarah Palin has shown us all that she is not just another talking head...she is living out her convictions,...what a refreshing thing that will be in Washington!
Thank you.

Posted by: Susan Wells | September 3, 2008 2:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why is it that a thirteen year-old girl doesn't need her parent's input when she makes a decision to have an abortion, but a seventeen year-old girl can't function without her parents constant attention if she decides to have her child?

Posted by: ABC | September 3, 2008 2:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You sound like a Sarah Palin wanna be but never will. She displays characteristics a person like you should emulate. You are just swimming around in that MSM cesspool thinking we are all dumb to realize your agenda. I don't consider you a reporter at all but a sniveling waste.

Posted by: Chuck | September 3, 2008 2:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Here's what Sally said in 1992


"What most [women] don't want is to be told how to live their personal lives"


Quinn, Sally. 1992. The feminist betrayal. Reader’s Digest 140:84-86

Posted by: KH | September 3, 2008 2:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn expresses her outrage on behalf of women, Southern Baptists, Republicans, and Conservatives.

To which of these groups does Ms. Quinn belong?
Is it proper to define members of groups to which
one does not belong proper?

Posted by: Bart Johnson | September 3, 2008 2:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So let me get this straight. Thirty five years ago Sally Quinn was not ready to be a TV anchor, and that's relevant to a discussion of whether Sarah Palin is ready to be Vice President now. Got news for you Sally, based on your inability to construct an argument, you're not qualified for the job you hold today.

Posted by: KHorn | September 3, 2008 2:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

KindlyAdvice,

That wasnt very nice. But since you brought it up, why not share some advice about securing that area with the 17 year olds of the world.

Posted by: TruthSpeaker | September 3, 2008 2:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, you're right. I guess women with children are not as good as men. Good call.

Posted by: Tkevan | September 3, 2008 2:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, try some honey in your douche dear you’ve become quite the sour puss!

Posted by: Kindly Advice | September 3, 2008 2:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I can't believe what old Sally, the media and many Democrats are saying about Sarah Palin & her family!! Like a previous poster says...they are rolling gleefully in their feculence, like a dog who discovers something disgusting in the grass. Such a perfect description of the Democrat party/media (same thing), wish I had thought of it.

Ruth


Posted by: Ruth | September 3, 2008 2:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You feminists are like crabs in a pot trying to grab and pull the one back in who is getting away. How dare you look at your own failures and suggest that because you couldn't hack it Palin won't be able to either?...You just keep watching this gal who is building a $40 billion pipe-line through Alaska, and all without federal assistance (which is only one of her many accomplishments). Your jealousy has come through loud and clear in your article. So get rid of your poochy lip disease, put a smile on your face and get ready to experience "the rest of the story.........." :)

Posted by: Kathy Andersen | September 3, 2008 2:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn...I don't even know what to say...all I can do is shake my head.

Would you like to give Sarah a rolling pin and an apron and have her stay in the kitchen like a good little housewife?

Posted by: Greg Martin | September 3, 2008 2:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn...I don't even know what to say...all I can do is shake my head.

Would you like to give Sarah a rolling pin and an apron and have her stay in the kitchen like a good little housewife?

Posted by: Greg Martin | September 3, 2008 2:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn should be told that Sarah Palin is not a Southern Baptist, but a Pentecostal, who have a proud tradition of women in leadership since the denomination was founded. Palin is, no doubt, well aware of the multi-tasking abilities of the Proverbs 31 woman, the charge God gave the propehtess Deborah, and the way God raised up Queen Esther "for such a time as this."

The Washington Post knows nothing about religious people, and it is an insult to us for them to allow her to write an article in the supposed voice of a religious authority.

Posted by: seanmom | September 3, 2008 1:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin is living her faith and principles, not just talking about them. Her daughter is doing the same. This is clearly a family that pulls together. What is inside you to cause you to trash them so? Have you no shame or decency? Sarah Palin is running for Vice President, not President. She is as qualified as others who have run for the Vice Presidency, albeit she is a different gender. You have nothing but your own negative speculation that she could not handle that job or even the Presidency in the unlikely event something happened to President McCain. It is Barack Obama who is running for President and who fails the test of being ready to be President, but you lack the integrity to write about that. How about also digging into Obama's relationship with Tony Rezco, William Ayers and Rev. Wright with the same fervor you and others have gone after Sarah Palin?

Posted by: D. Thomas | September 3, 2008 1:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gosh! You people are just ignorant. Why would McCain not pick someone who caters to the base. Christians "myself" believe in supporting the family during good and bad times and it looks like Sarahs family is doing just that. Also her husband is rihgt there with her at every step...I say the best thing that will come from her young daughters pregnancy is "its going to happen" and not be another needless death on the floor of an abortionist.

Posted by: Daveman | September 3, 2008 1:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Another example of the 'elite' media types who think they know everything; who wallow in a fetid and festering wasteland known as the beltway; who are convinced they are smarter than the rest of us (remember Howell Raines' stupid comment 'surely the country knows John Kerry is smarter than George Bush, when in reality Bush had better grades & a higher SAT, but we won't let the facts deter our superior intellect and attitudes)

Posted by: Kent Pomrenke | September 3, 2008 1:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama, “Suck, suck, swallow Sally and remember its not polite to speak with your mouth so full - hey watch that second row of teeth!”

Geez!

Posted by: Obamanation | September 3, 2008 1:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

To raise this issue as a legitimate campaign concern is an insult to the intelligence of the American voters. Sally Quinn is a joke as a journalist and would be better used writing greeting cards for Hallmark than as a professional reporting pertinent news.

Posted by: Jack Lenburg | September 3, 2008 1:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Interesting that "personal attacks...will be removed from the site" but an entire personal article written by Ms. Quinn is permitted. Another example of the hypocrisy of some of the media. SWEIN.

This is "nothing against Quinn", but she was a much better TV personality than a news writer.

Posted by: Clark | September 3, 2008 1:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Soledad isnt running for the 2nd most powerful job in the country. Soledad isnt expected to be available 24/7.
Soldedad has all healthy babies and doesnt have a promiscous 17 year old pregnant daughter.

No one is saying that a mother cant have a career outside of the home. Personally a real woman will be able to do both and always put family first.

In the role of VP, its AMERICA first and family second. Doesnt sound like thats the order that the traditional Family Values promoting GOP has stood for.

Sounds very hypocritical now to be changing ships midstream, but anything to win an election, I guess.

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 3, 2008 1:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow. I'm dumbfounded. Talk about a double standard. Are you saying that Barack Obama is qualified for the presidency but Sarah Palin is not? Give me a break.

Posted by: Patricia | September 3, 2008 1:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow. I'm dumbfounded. Talk about a double standard. Are you saying that Barack Obama is qualified for the presidency but Sarah Palin is not? Give me a break.

Posted by: Patricia | September 3, 2008 1:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"...no time to play gender politics..." That is truly comical. Hillary is politically different from Obama how?

With few exceptions, you lefties are missing the point. We like Palin because she is conservative, not because she is a woman. If McCain was just angling for Hillary votes, he would have chosen a pro-choice RINO.

Posted by: lloydrmc | September 3, 2008 1:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Are you serious?

You just said that Soledad O'Brian should stay at home. She has 4 children, all under the age of 8. Why did you never attack her for neglecting her children?

Check it out yourself.

http://soledadobrien.info/

You just took the position that society should not "put the mother of young children in a job outside the home that will demand so much of her time and energy."

If a Republican ever made such a statement, you and your compatriots would crucify him or her.

Posted by: sally miller | September 3, 2008 1:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn's article is outrageous and hits below the belt. She has no right to tell someone how to manage their family or their children... or to presume to know more than they do in this regard.

This is all the more outrageous considering the qualifications of the democratic nominee for president, who is nothing but a socialist and who has been in the pocket of Tony Rezko since law school. And don't think Ayers is going to go away. No chance!

As far as Mr. Biden, he might have experience, but his foreign policy decisions have been more than questionable--and what about his son's and brother's involvement in a crooked hedgefund scam? What's your take on that, Ms. Quinn...?

I'm sure had Sarah been a liberal woman, this editorial would have been very different indeed.

Yours truly,

Deborah McCoy

Posted by: Deborah McCoy | September 3, 2008 1:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Everything either side does is calculated. I think you protest way too much. I think McCain's choice is brilliant. If family is off limits for Obama then it should be off limits to you. This piece is so one-sided it makes me sick! Get over it. Have a great day. :)

Posted by: Sandee Clark | September 3, 2008 1:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is OBAMA ready TO BE PRESIDENT.? DId you ask that question?Why is it GOOD FOR You and all the other women in politics and THE MEDIA to have CHILDREN and A CAREER but a conservative woman can't raise a FAMILY and be a governor and VICE PRESIDENT> YOU shoud be ashamed at being such HYPOCRITE. Women will never break through the glass ceiling because comments such as this reinforce it with concrete.

Posted by: Lisa Kulp | September 3, 2008 1:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are nuts Sally Quinn!
Sarah Palin is a great woman.
You should be building her up not cutting her down.
I can't wait to vote for her she brings excitement to McCain and the Republican party.
Maybe a new Ronald Reagan in Palin.

God Bless the USA and women like Palin.

Posted by: Tim | September 3, 2008 1:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, your a boring bonehead, you need to retire.

Posted by: Dave C. | September 3, 2008 1:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Shame on you Sally Quinn!

Where were these misplaced demands that individuals prioritize family and avid public service when Nancy Pelosi (a mother & grandmother) took onthe role of speaker of the house. Or is is just that she is a libral politician and thus your outrageous doule standard doesnt apply to her.

Where was thiso outcry about family matters as "distractions" from ones public service when Bill Clinton was having trouble keeping his lies straight concerning al lof his extra-marital affairs, lying under oath, impeachment, etc. were going on. NO! Then the "distractions" didn't keep him from serving effectively.

What a joke!

And another thing... Since when are you the definer of evengelicals and their beliefs and practices.

You are truly a disgrace.

Posted by: Ron C. | September 3, 2008 1:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WaPo Created an On Faith site in-house so they never have to deal with the other side - just stuff the thing with socialist and atheists.

Then trot out these clowns like Sally Quinn to pretend to speak for religious people!

What a JOKE. . .

Posted by: On Faith - WaPo Shame! | September 3, 2008 1:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn has personally taken the 'women's movement" back 100 years while being so hypocritical it is hilarious!

MESSAGE FOR FAR LEFT (individuals and media types):

KEEP IT UP-YOU ARE TOTALLY LOSING IT!

The wacko left is making sure that McCain/Palin will win bigger than Reagan did!

KEEP IT UP!!!!!
And my sincere thanks!

Posted by: Susan | September 3, 2008 1:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are insulting to women, Sally. I would like to know who appointed you as the all powerful judge of whether or not Sarah Palin can be a good mother to her children while holding the position of vice president. These attacks on Sarah Palin are vicious and completely inappropriate. It is amazing that you in the media who think you are so smart and above the rest of us could be so blind as to the damage you are doing to yourselves and to your messiah Obama.

Posted by: Kellin | September 3, 2008 1:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hypocrite. It isn't about women's rights or the rights of African Americans, or the rights of working people with you is it? Typically liberal, you espouse these rights only if the people that might benefit from them agree with YOUR ideology.

Posted by: Lark Mulvahill | September 3, 2008 1:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think McCain choice for the VP is the best decision he has done in this regard. Excellent choice of a woman who has the achievements not many congress people have. A decision maker, strong values, with an outstanding record as a public server in her state and in her duties as a Major. Who are you to say that a woman like her is not qualified? I simple and plain think, your are afraid of her attributes in every aspect. Go to the core of the issue and do not try to distract the public from what is important in the process of having a public server in our country administration. I would suggest you to check on Mr. Obama's judgements and associates who have brought him into the public arena. Or better, Why do not question Biden with his multi millionaire young son, Hunter Biden involved in lobbing his father. Do not play the victim of the Republican's decisions and try to outsmart the judgment of we, the public and voters, with such a disgrace comments of Mrs. Palin. If you call yourself a journalist, do your due diligence in bringing factual reports and concrete issues and do not play with the integrity of a public figure. I will suggest you to listen Rush Limbaugh and you might get some insight in having a better judgment. Behave yourself and be a competent journalist.

Posted by: Lenita | September 3, 2008 12:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow - it's amazing how little Sally Quinn knows about Evangelical strong women. When will "experts" like Sally Quinn stop deciding what others can handle. Sally Quinn is obviously not as strong a women as Sarah Palin and for some reason that is threatening so she needs to tear her down.

Christians are called to love one another and build each other up. It looks like the Palin family is all about that.

Posted by: Donna | September 3, 2008 12:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You, madam, are a hateful person and a disgrace to humanity.

Posted by: Bob | September 3, 2008 12:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Reading the posts here I can see that you put foot in mouth Ol' Sal. You didn't think this would be the case did you? I am pleased to read that most people do NOT think like you do. You are one old mean-spirited broad.

Christina

Posted by: Christina | September 3, 2008 12:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job?"

Are you serious? The real question is one you are unwilling to ask for obvious reasons and that is "Is Obama prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job he is seeking?".

Sarah Palin has more executive experience than Obama and Biden combined and that's a fact. She is a true DC outsider, unlike Biden who is running on the Change ticket and who has been in the senate so long he probably thinks his first name is Senator.

Posted by: Mudd | September 3, 2008 12:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"So, she must be destroyed by any means possible."
Politics of personal destruction is back. It's like it or hate it, they squirm and get desperate for they have no courage. Even the kids are not off limits as the political terrorists seek to twist religion into a new faith based on common destruction. They always end up destroying themselves, playing supermen, which saves us the time of day. Go have a slice of apple pie, get into your Chevrolet and enjoy the day. I got pork, beer, spuds and am thinking about a certain Eve and another lonely evening. Life comes at you fast, love comes from you slowly. It only seems fast. Avoid fast women and drive fast cars. Keep your motors running and your blades sharp. The train keeps a rolling all night long, so bite the Big Apple and try to keep the kids from squirming too much. They aren't worms, well the better half anyways aren't. Gone Fishing!

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 3, 2008 12:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

SALLY,

You are blinded from the darkness in which you live.
The self-absorbed loneliness, that is your closed world, has allowed the fermintaion of the bile in your mind and now dribbles from your mouth.

Posted by: EXJUPITER | September 3, 2008 12:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quin, please stop with this stuff, you're playing directly into the hands of McCain. Arguing that Palin isn't in a position to be Vice President because of her children seems regressive, not progressive.

These kind of opinions only alienate older moderate women. Focus on the issues. These attacks on Palin and her family don't help. Amongst my Mother and her friends, a group of successful women with families, are angered by these attacks. They agree with the democrats on many issues, but if this becomes a male-female divide, then you will be sucessful in driving them to McCain.

Actually, as I write this, Rush Limbaugh is playing you up. If I didn't know better, I would think you were running a false flag operation against Obama.

Posted by: Andrew Hvatum | September 3, 2008 12:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"So, she must be destroyed by any means possible."
Politics of personal destruction is back. It's like it or hate it, they squirm and get desperate for they have no courage. Even the kids are not off limits as the political terrorists seek to twist religion into a new faith based on common destruction. They always end up destroying themselves, playing supermen, which saves us the time of day. Go have a slice of apple pie, get into your Chevrolet and enjoy the day. I got pork, beer, spuds and am thinking about a certain Eve and another lonely evening. Life comes at you fast, love comes from you slowly. It only seems fast. Avoid fast women and drive fast cars. Keep your motors running and your blades sharp. The train keeps a rolling all night long, so bite the Big Apple and try to keep the kids from squirming too much. They aren't worms, well the better half anyways aren't. Gone Fishing!

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 3, 2008 12:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
It is sad that you think you are a reporter. You are obviously bias like much of the main stream media. I find it alarming that so many people like your self will destroy your creditability to advance your political views. Why can't the father be the main care giver? Why is it O.K. for Men to do what she is doing without question? You seem to be an angry angry women. You should seek help.

Posted by: A man from IL. | September 3, 2008 12:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn, Maureen Dowd, and others of their ilk are perfect examples of why the "C" word has not faded from our lexicon.

Perhaps, Mizz Quinn, you would have a compelling argument were it not for your own lack of achievements...outside of marrying the boss.

Posted by: Ron Jones | September 3, 2008 12:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
It is sad that you think you are a reporter. You are obviously bias like much of the main stream media. I find it alarming that so many people like your self will destroy your creditability to advance your political views. Why can't the father be the main care giver? Why is it O.K. for Men to do what she is doing without question? You seem to be an angry angry women. You should seek help.

Posted by: A man from IL. | September 3, 2008 12:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

president clinton's choice of al gore
president bush's choice of cheney
al gore's choice of liebermann
washington redskins choice of joe gibbs
obama selection of biden
us olympic team selecting phelps
ny giants calling for a pass play on 3rd and long
new england patriots signing randy moss

It is a choice made to try to win (an election.)
i'm in
are you in?

thank you
tom in mn

Posted by: tom in mn | September 3, 2008 12:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You madam are not only arrogant but also a sham of a journalist.To insinuate that governor Palin is not going to be able to devote attention to her family is beyond ludicrous, it is ridiculous. You and all of the rest of the liberal media are scared to death of Governor Palin because she is something you all will never be, HONEST.

Posted by: bryan lamb | September 3, 2008 12:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I could hardly believe what I read here.

But, then, I considered the source.

Sally Quinn owes her success to her husband, Ben Bradlee.

Of course, a woman like Ms. Quinn, who is only important because of whom she sleeps with, would be opposed to a self-made woman like Gov. Palin.

Posted by: Disgusted | September 3, 2008 12:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Well that explains why Madame Speaker is so dumb - too many kids and grand kids distracting her!

Thanks Sally for explaining that.

She should resign first!

Then we can see if you really believe your own garbage!

Yeah, didn't think so!

Posted by: Ooohhh!!!! | September 3, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WOW!! Who needs sexists when you have Sally Quinn?

Posted by: Jeff Mellott | September 3, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn has no idea what it means to be a Christian woman. It is obvious that scripture is something that she has not read. Throughout scripture God has chosen to use women to meet His purpose. God chose Deborah to lead an army, Rahab to help the children or Israel, and Mary the mother of Jesus to carry the most precious gift this world has ever received. So before you start your idiotic rhetoric take time to learn something.

Posted by: J Ferguson | September 3, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You disgust me

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I could hardly believe what I read here.

But, then, I considered the source.

Sally Quinn owes her success to her husband, Ben Bradlee.

Of course, a woman like Ms. Quinn, who is only important because of whom she sleeps with, would be opposed to a self-made woman like Gov. Palin.

Posted by: Disgusted. | September 3, 2008 12:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey Sally . . . just heard your comments about women staying home and raising their families instead of running for Vice President . . . Way to go . . . you are bringing the feminist movement back into the dark ages . . . how about taking on women's suffrage next?

Posted by: Michael Palmer | September 3, 2008 12:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey Sally . . . just heard your comments about women staying home and raising their families instead of running for Vice President . . . Way to go . . . you are bringing the feminist movement back into the dark ages . . . how about taking on women's suffrage next?

Posted by: Michael Palmer | September 3, 2008 12:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I could hardly believe what I read here.

But, then, I considered the source.

Sally Quinn owes her success to her husband, Ben Bradlee.

Of course, a woman like Ms. Quinn, who is only important because of whom she sleeps with, would be opposed to a self-made woman like Gov. Palin.

Posted by: Disgusted. | September 3, 2008 12:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn,

You are a jealous, hate filled liberal who has no sense of professionalism and decency. The Washington post and the drive-by media are nothing but sock puppets for the democrat party.

I am offended at your two-faced hypocrisy. You and your cohorts have crossed all lines in your attack of Sarah Palin's family. Sarah is 10 times the woman that you will ever be.

Go ahead and keep on campaigning for Obama under the pretense of "journalism". So much for the politics of personal destruction, you are the master of it.

You are not a feminists, you are a fraud. Do us all a favor and resign!

Posted by: Brian | September 3, 2008 12:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

president clinton's choice of al gore
president bush's choice of cheney
al gore's choice of liebermann
washington redskins choice of joe gibbs
obama selection of biden
us olympic team selecting phelps
ny giants calling for a pass play on 3rd and long
new england patriots signing randy moss

It is a choice made to try to win (an election.)
i'm in
are you in?

thank you
tom in mn

Posted by: tom in mn | September 3, 2008 12:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally:

I want to know what century you are living in. I am a right wing christian conservative and very much a woman. I think Ms. Palin is wonderful and fully support her. I cannot believe that you are saying in this day and time that we as Christians do not believe that women are able to do whatever they desire. God gave us free will and ability to do whatever. Women were very important in the Bible. I believe that you need to go back and actually read the Bible. I don't think you understand the Bible.
Thank you
Lacy

Posted by: Lacy | September 3, 2008 12:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

You are an idiot. And you cannot be a woman. I don't know what sex you are, but if you cannot understand the Palin equation, something is wrong with you. What about Nancy Pilosi? Did you write about her when she first got into politics with five kids? Hmm?

Posted by: Mrs. Hilliard | September 3, 2008 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You can be a "hands-on-mother" and still have a kid go bad. My parents had 4 kids, 3 turned out to be good people and 1 turned to the dark side for whatever reason. Beside there's only 3 things to do in Alaska: hunt, drink, and screw so the fact that this girl gets preggers at 17 doesn't concern me. Sure beats having a kid at 14!

Posted by: Gutbucket | September 3, 2008 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn is incorrectly stereotyping evangelical Christians. I am an evangelical Christian and I have been working my entire married life. I had to but it's not by choice. Do I regret not staying home to raise my kids, sure! I would much rather spend time with my family than in an office. Am I "subservient" to my husband? No, he is my spiritual head. We discuss things together but, in the end, he has the final say. I am college educated, madam, not barefoot and pregnant.

Posted by: Deborah | September 3, 2008 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally:

I want to know what century you are living in. I am a right wing christian conservative and very much a woman. I think Ms. Palin is wonderful and fully support her. I cannot believe that you are saying in this day and time that we as Christians do not believe that women are able to do whatever they desire. God gave us free will and ability to do whatever. Women were very important in the Bible. I believe that you need to go back and actually read the Bible. I don't think you understand the Bible.
Thank you
Lacy

Posted by: Lacy | September 3, 2008 12:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn you are a damn idiot. You two faced sorry excuse for a woman.

Posted by: icon | September 3, 2008 12:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Governor Palin was a liberal, would such sexism be used to discredit her?

Posted by: Sexism | September 3, 2008 12:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn has once again showed her true liberal bias. I am a 64-year-old Evangelical woman, mother and grandmother whose 16-year-old daughter had a child out of wedlock. Contrary to your opinion, all my church friends were not only supportive of my daughter and the child, but to we her parents. There was no one throwing darts (unlike the liberal media, I might add), and we found out what it means for people to act Christ-like. Oh, and by the way, our daughter went on to graduate from college with honors, works for a Fortune 500 company and has supported she and her son very well. I have worked since before my children were born, and I handle both working and motherhood very well as do thousands of other Evangelical women and mothers. The media is showing what we all knew from the beginning of Obama's campaign; the media will do absolutely anything to get him elected and will destroy by outright lies or innuendo anyone who stands in the way. Shame on the media - shame on you Sally Quinn. Oh, where was the comparable story on what Obama was doing 22 years ago (doing drugs and bragging about it) versus Todd Palin's DUI? The media is so disgustingly one-sided and America is noticing!!

Posted by: Janet Hutson | September 3, 2008 12:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How hypocritical can you be? McCain made an amazing choice in Sarah Palin, who can run circles around Biden in her ability to speak and communicate. Sally Quinn is a person who pretends to have principles, that in fact she does not actually possess. What a double standard.

Posted by: Laura | September 3, 2008 12:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn you are a damn idiot. You two faced sorry excuse for a woman.

Posted by: icon | September 3, 2008 12:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Governor Palin was a liberal, would such sexism be used to discredit her?

Posted by: Sexism | September 3, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Would you like me to get inside a glass cube? Is the glass ceiling not enough, do you need us completely encased. Is this because you could not do it? My husband is the homemaker in our family and role-reversal is a fact of today's families. Get into the 21st century.

Posted by: wanda | September 3, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally; I demand you have your kids get a blood test and find out who their father really is!

Posted by: gatsby | September 3, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maybe you are right, and the liberals picked Obama just because he is black! How can a publication like yours print trash such as this spat out by someone like Quinn. It removes any credibility you might have had left. Danny

Posted by: Danny | September 3, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn has once again showed her true liberal bias. I am a 64-year-old Evangelical woman, mother and grandmother whose 16-year-old daughter had a child out of wedlock. Contrary to your opinion, all my church friends were not only supportive of my daughter and the child, but to we her parents. There was no one throwing darts (unlike the liberal media, I might add), and we found out what it means for people to act Christ-like. Oh, and by the way, our daughter went on to graduate from college with honors, works for a Fortune 500 company and has supported she and her son very well. I have worked since before my children were born, and I handle both working and motherhood very well as do thousands of other Evangelical women and mothers. The media is showing what we all knew from the beginning of Obama's campaign; the media will do absolutely anything to get him elected and will destroy by outright lies or innuendo anyone who stands in the way. Shame on the media - shame on you Sally Quinn. Oh, where was the comparable story on what Obama was doing 22 years ago (doing drugs and bragging about it) versus Todd Palin's DUI? The media is so disgustingly one-sided and America is noticing!!

Posted by: Janet Hutson | September 3, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Governor Palin was a liberal, would such sexism be used to discredit her?

Posted by: Sexism | September 3, 2008 12:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey Sally,

My question is Senator Obama (roughly 175 days in to his Freshman Term) ready to lead the country. What has he done. Oh yeah, he has written two books about himself. He's 47 and he has already written two books about himself? No self promotion there!

He has no executive level experience. He has no real legislative accomplishments other than a couple of token co-authored bills. When he does vote he votes far left all of the time. He has voted present over 90 times.

Then he chooses Biden. Sounds like old Washington elites at work again. So much for change.

Posted by: J Frey | September 3, 2008 12:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You may be a woman, but you obviously don't know a thing about conservative women, otherwise you wouldn't stereotype them as all having the same opinions about their roles and priorities among family, career and faith. Hello? A man can't be the primary caretaker? I'm in healthcare mgmt and have known several female physicians who have stay-at-home dads who can handle the role as caretaker (even - gasp! -- when they're sick or have special needs). What worked -- or didn't work -- for you, may not be the case for others. I'm a conservative,Catholic who's a 3rd generation working mom and somehow we've all made it work and had well-adjusted, happy children and happy marriages. Sorry if we don't fit the equation, but I thought equality for women was all about doing your own thing and not being judged for it.

Posted by: CindyM | September 3, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Investigations on Sally Quinn begins today.

Posted by: T Lewis | September 3, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Funny - since when is a leftist feminist like Quinn concerned about family?

And as far as experience - what executive and foreign policy experience does Obama have and did Bill Clinton have when he was governor of Arkansas? I guess you get a pass if you are a left wing socialist.

Hey Quinn - your lefty slip is showing and its not very pretty.

Posted by: Jim | September 3, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are a disgusting human being!

Posted by: Dawn | September 3, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is Ms. Quinn prepared to make the exact same analysis and argument were Governor Palin a liberal-leaning Democrat. I think not, and I find Ms. Quinn's commentary highly disingenuous and calculated.

Posted by: r. w. nakea | September 3, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Shut up Sally Quinn. It is none of your damn business how many children Sarah Palin has. If she was a liberal you would love her.
Ruth Lindemann

Posted by: Ruth Lindemann | September 3, 2008 12:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is a hypocrite of the first order.

Nothing else needs to be said.

Posted by: Paul Greene | September 3, 2008 12:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Paragraph 11. The word is spelled "presidency", as in "vice presidency"

Posted by: Timothy DeWitt | September 3, 2008 12:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is a nut job

Posted by: Scott Kress | September 3, 2008 12:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

how exactly was sally quinn hired at washington post with NO experience?
was she sexually active with the managment staff?
is ben bradlee the actual father of her kid?
or is it bob bernstein?

Posted by: danielle estonovich | September 3, 2008 12:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I cannot believe what I am reading. In this day and age when women have achieved many of the same goals in the business and political arenas as men, I cannot believe the backward-thinking expressed in this article. It is almost beyond belief that a liberal, left-leaning person like yourself would restrain a WOMAN from achieving such a prominent goal. I guess in today's society, even other women are jealous of a powerful woman's rise to power, and would relegate her to baking cookies and nursing kids. "Barefoot and pregnant" - thought that phrase went out with the 70's. Thought you girls were the ones who said women could have it all.
You go, Sarah!!

Posted by: Rick | September 3, 2008 12:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This woman is definitely insecure and if she is representative of the women's movement in this Country then you all are in trouble. She actually wants to keep women in there place. Sarah has already shown she can handle major responsibility of family and government and still do an outstanding job. She doesn't kill those who can't defend themselves or throw her daughter out because of a baby. She doesn't look at a baby as being a punishment of God. She is a strong women and will be great for this morally and deceitful Country that is going the wrong way and needs to be turned around. John and Sarah can and will do it. God Bless them both and America. Tom and Joni Krapf, Orlando

Posted by: Thomas & Joni Krapf | September 3, 2008 11:58 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This is disengenuous and patronizing, and quite frankly nothing more than a mean political attack against a successful, conservative woman who looks to already be adapt at balancing a career and family.

The pathetic arguments Ms Quinn put forth are too numerous to address all at once. Some are more absurd than others, including this one:

To say having a daughter and grandchild is a great distraction, is ridiculous. I guess the world stops for all of us who have daughters and grandchildren... I can't imagine how those people who have more than one daughter and scores of grandchildren ever get anything done, much less are even able to survive?

Regarding the comment that this is a "cynical and calculated move". I guess the choice of Barak Obama is neither? And once again, you are playing the "death watch" fear campaign against Senator McCain - give it up Sally, that's pathetic.

The arguments Ms Quinn put forth are painfully trite and, I'm afraid, not unexpected from someone on the left. Shame on the Washington Post for even considering such a hateful editorial.

Posted by: Stuart Sorensen | September 3, 2008 11:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Are you sure your a woman? This piece of literary drivel is disgusting even by Washington Post yellow standards.

I mean, you sound a bit like a charter misogynist in your tirade here. I'll just bet your editorial pit-bosses are mightily ticked off that the GOP has seen fit to trust their future to a capable, talented and no nonsense woman who is neither named Hillary Clinton nor is a Democrat and it galls them (and you) to no end.

You should wake up and smell what you're pedaling here. If nothing else, you are actually doing Obama a disservice by stooping to these sorts of smear tactics. I was strongly contemplating Obama's stated vision for the future and giving him a good solid look see, but honestly if that means that people like you get your candidate put into office it is not worth it even if he were the second coming of George Washington himself.

Posted by: Stephen Rybacki | September 3, 2008 11:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama should say at home and take care of his young girls. Sally, either you don't have children or you are a terrible mother for neglecting them while you work. That is what you are saying in your article. I personally think you are scum and a liar, but that is just my opinion.

Posted by: WOMEN | September 3, 2008 11:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow Sally Quinn! Sarah Palin's ascension to the national spot light (and possible VP position) has really struck a nerve with you. Are the veins in your forehead as big as your ego right now? She is more woman than you . . . admit it . . . and then get on with your life. I'd be careful with your comments . . . they might backfire on you (like before).

Posted by: D | September 3, 2008 11:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You sound very bitter, and possibly suffer from self-loathing. Get better.

Posted by: Ken | September 3, 2008 11:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms.Quinn: Voters have always voted for someone who represents their views or lifestyle. The VP candidate is a woman which represents half of the population.Ms. Palin is a successful Governor with a great family, and according to you, she is not ready. She will be surrounded by experts from all phases of life to guide her through the Washington way. She will be surrounded by foreign policy experts who will guide her through that process as well. She is intelligent, and she will figure it out and make her own decisions, just like anyone else. We have had enough of the four term Congressman or Senators who have the so called "experience". I like the thought of having a smart and successful mother as the VP. By the way...have you ever heard of spellcheck?

Posted by: Mark OBrien | September 3, 2008 11:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The vice president has virtually nothing to do. Maybe one weeks worth of work to do a year - that is it.

Obama has two young girls, and next to no experience. Is HE ready for a job which actually is all consuming?

Posted by: Richard Lyon | September 3, 2008 11:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you're truly an idiot. God help you.

Posted by: john | September 3, 2008 11:17 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Are you serious? Is this the "progressive" future we have to look forward to from pundits like you - "She is the mother of five children", "a four-month-old with Down Syndrome", "Not to mention the grandchild" - are now suddenly valid disqualifers for an American running for vice president? Or is it just because she's a woman? And I just love your statement, "Her first priority has to be her children". That statement reminds me of the men who showed up at one of Hillary's public appearances with "Iron My Shirt" garb. Could you possibly be more sexist?

M'am, you seriously need to take a look at yourself and analyze your values.
http://brianw.blogtownhall.com/

Posted by: BrianW | September 3, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

So Sally Quinn did you get your position because you were a women or huh....you your experience. I guess that is still to be decided.

Posted by: Jefftrey Republican | September 3, 2008 11:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I expect no less from Liberal Sally. Let's all remember how she became Mrs. Bradley and mama was out sleeping around with Barry Goldwater

Posted by: Dixie | September 3, 2008 11:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

How can you tell that Sally Quinn and the rest of the out-of-touch editors at the Washington Post and the New York Times are afraid of a candidate?

When they foam at the mouth with indignation, whine at how offended they are, and make arguments against the candidate that they would never apply to their favorite, anointed candidate for President.

Its really going to be funny to watch Sally and her other elitist friends come up with more of their double-standard arguments after Palin gives her speech tonight, and Americans find out she is an intelligent, reasonable and articulate woman, every bit as ready to lead as either of the two good old Senate colleagues on the Democratic ticket.

Posted by: laughing in va | September 3, 2008 11:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Governors historicallly make better Presidents than Senators
And we have drifted so far from our founding roots, that it is refreshing to see someone in the white house that has high level of Judeo-Christian principles
After all, our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, and our laws are based on those principles. As a society that has been the most prosperous ever in the world because of those principals, we need to change our ways and return to God. Has anyone noticed that almost only in the US can a person of any other religion freely worsip (and maybe destroy our country), but Christians are nor free to exercise their religion in most other countries. The UN is dominated with muslims and is also on the attack agaiinst Christianity.

Posted by: Tom | September 3, 2008 11:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

If only Gov. Palin was a liberal like you then it would be all good!! Almost all my girlfriends work outside the home and they are all Christians, you obviously do not understand Christianity. Don't you worry your little head about Gov. Palin's family they will get along just fine. You might want to start worring about the plagiarist VP on the other ticket with his lobbiest grown sons. Just food for thought.
Sally you are no Sarah!

Posted by: Laurie | September 3, 2008 10:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I find this piece to be a deliberate attack on a woman who has done nothing but live her life according to her values. You should be ashamed of yourself for stooping to the level of the kook left wing of the Democratic Party. A smear like this can not go with out consequence to you and your so called news organization a pox on both of your houses and I hope you reap what you sow.

Posted by: phil from colorado | September 3, 2008 10:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am truly disgusted by this article. The hypocrisy is just too much to handle.

Posted by: Stephen | September 3, 2008 10:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am absolutely sick over the way women are attacking Sarah Palin. Senator Biden is held up as a working class hero for working in the Senate with a long commute as a single dad. Did anyone question his parenting skills? This is a blatant sexist smear -- and from an educated & accomplished woman?!! You are no feminist and your smear attacks are going to send us right back to the kitchen. SHAME ON YOU!!!

Posted by: Stephanie A. | September 3, 2008 10:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

In a country where more than 90% of its citizens believe in God why would we believe anything written by a secularist. Especially a column by a media elitist who lives inside of the beltway. Don't you realize that America is a conservative nation. This election is a classic McGovern race of 1972. The shooting star finally burns out and the daylight comes. With that daylight this country will come to its senses and never vote for a "black liberation theologist" from the south side of Chicago. Palin knows what corruption is, and Chicago corruption will be in her headlights.

Posted by: Peter Kondos | September 3, 2008 10:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I cannot believe a woman wrote such a sexist article. Two of Governor Palin's children are grown and she has a husband that can help with the younger children. My mother almost always worked and my father, who was quite nurturing in his own right, was very helpful. Single parents have to make do and play both roles all the time. It is not fair for anyone to judge that the Palins, as a married couple, are incapable of maintaining a healthy family environment despite one of them (in this case, the woman) holding a demanding job.

Posted by: Edwina | September 3, 2008 10:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What an ego! Being considered as co-anchor for a network news show is nowhere near the same thing as being vice-president. Ms. Quinn wasn't ready 35 years ago so Mrs. Palin isn't ready today? Unless Ms. Quinn has access to the inner workings of the John McCain campaign, or McCain himself, she cannot state as a fact that Mrs. Palin was picked solely because she was a woman. Apparently, Ms. Quinn is unaware that there's a difference between her opinion and fact. What condescension! I thought it was a feminist given that woman could have a family and a job. I guess that only goes for liberal women. Conservative women are supposed to stay home and take care of their babies because, apparently, that's all the Left thinks they're good for.

Democrats should take a minute out from their hatred for all things Right and see a few years down the line, years during which Conservatives are having babies and liberals are aborting theirs. Who's going to be in the majority?

Posted by: Roxanna M | September 3, 2008 10:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn comments:

"And now we learn the 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is pregnant. She and the father of the child plan to marry. This may be a hard one for the Republican conservative family-values crowd to swallow. Of course, this can happen in any family. But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother."

Ms Quinn apparently doesn't know that Senator Obama's mother was 17, unmarried, and pregnant, as well. She was in the exact same situation Bristol Palin finds herself in today. So why does she not apply the same questions, concerns and values to his mother? Was Senator Obama's mother enough of a "hands on mother" when she left him in Hawaii in the care of his grandparents so she could resume her 17 year career in study for a PHD?

Ms Quinn either is ignorant of this fact, or plainly uses a double standard in this issue of a motherly relationship with her children. This is another excellent example of blatant hypocrisy in the dinosaur print media. Good going there Ms Quinn.

Ms Quinn asks:

"Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job?"

Governor Palin is obviously better prepared to do her job, than Ms Quinn is to do her job, because Governor Palin has the obvious talent to do everything the feminist agenda has touted for the last 40 years, and either Ms Quinn fails to recognize it, or refuses to acknowledge it.

In either instance, Ms Quinn has failed in her professional repsonsibilty to do her job, so perhaps she needs to go back to Journalism school and learn how to merely report a story, so as to be unbiased, fair,and balanced, in the delivery of news copy, and keep her personal biased point of view private from the reader.

Perhaps Ms Quinn needs to take a lesson from a real feminist such as Governor Palin who is an all achieving woman, rather than apply a double standard to a woman who has "walked the walk" rather than merely "talked the talk", as Ms Quinn so clearly demonstrates in this matter. It is obvious Ms Quinn is merely "mouthing" the feminist agenda and Governor Palin is "living" the feminist agenda. Now I ask, who is more credible?

Posted by: Brien Kroeger | September 3, 2008 10:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am an adamant Obama supporter and a Democrat, but I am seething about this post, and about Ms. Quinn's appearance on the Today Show this morning. However Sarah Palin manages her family is her own business. We would NEVER be having this discussion about a male candidate. As a working mother of a baby, I appreciate how much time and energy it takes to raise a child. I also understand that there's a fundamental difference between a mother's relationship with her child and a father's. But guess what---I am also the primary breadwinner in my family, and my husband is the primary caregiver. And it's working just fine. Instead of wasting all of this time making foolish and presumptuous judgments that distract from the real issues, why not focus on what matters? There are plenty of reasons that I am not voting for McCain/Palin, but her family issues have nothing do to with me or my vote.

Posted by: Marie | September 3, 2008 10:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Re Quinn's piece about Gov Palin:

This yellow bit of writing is just one more example of why the "mainstream press" is no longer the "mainstream press" but rather an "out in the open" arm of the democrat party.

Freedom of the Press carries an obligation to have integrity and honesty. The Quinn's of the media world have destroyed virtually all that the news media SHOULD stand for.

Posted by: J. Dean | September 3, 2008 10:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am already against Palin not because of her pro-life (for humans only) stance, but because she is a hippocrite. Pro- life kill animals? Reproduce like rabits No planet left for them to multiply on? Pro-violence unnessesary Iraq war? I mean come on do republicans think we are all that stupid? The republican party is so outdated they are all angry old white men with their brainwashed wives. Guess what? I am not a dem. or independent. I am a disgusted American citizen that wants the country to get off religion and morals bandwagon and run the economy save the planet before its to late, and have respect for ALL living beings Animals and trees included!!!

Posted by: Mary | September 3, 2008 9:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Frankly, this piece just recycles all the democratic attack points we've already heard about Palin. All you people can do is complain that McCain picked a woman. If he had picked a white male, people would be complaining about the lack of diversity on his ticket. But since he picks a woman(or if he had picked a minority man), all you do is complain about how cynical and political it is. How dare he pick a running mate who he thinks will help him the election. No presidential candidate has ever done that before? Obama certainly didn't pick Biden because he thought it would help him lose the election. If Obama had picked Hillary, would you be complaining that was just a cynical ploy to win woman voters? And what is all this stuff about a woman not be able to handle the job of vice president? Doesn't that go against everything feminists have been fighting for the past 50 or more years? Why do I have a feeling we wouldn't be hearing all these complaints(from liberals anyway) if Palin was a liberal in her same situation and she was Obama's running mate? And how dare she have a child with Down syndrome or an unwed daughter who is pregnant and actually having the child. We all know a "sensible" person would have just "taken care of the two problems" by aborting them before they were born. How dare woman actually use their choice to chose life. Excuse the rant, but this article deserved nothing more coherent in response than that.

Posted by: P | September 3, 2008 9:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment

as a journalist you're an embarrassment. the attacks on palins family doesn't represent responsible journalism. i've been a democrat for forty years and thought issues are what counts. but you and the web bloggers demonstrate that we don't need to talk about the issues of the day, when we can destroy a candidate and her family by speading outrageous distortions.

Posted by: noke | September 3, 2008 9:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

She is also being sold as having more experience than Obama & Biden.
Being Governor of a state with less than 700,000 people and a commensurate budget, doesn't make the cut list as experience as does being next door to Russia make it for foreign policy experience.!

Posted by: D. L. Fertel | September 3, 2008 9:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"This is no time to play gender politics" . Sally Quinn should see the irony in her statement. Who is playing gender politics? Nancy Pelosi didn't get involved in politics until her children were older. Should we tell our daughters not to get involved in the workplace until their children are older?

Sally Quinn's comments "her first priority has to be her children" are the same as those southern leaders quoted as saying "a wife...has the god-given responsibility... in managing the household and nurturing the next generation."

And the final insult to working women..." a mother's role is different from a father's". Can my boss use that line on me next time I ask for a raise? Women are still working to get pay on parity with men.

My reaction to this article is "shock. Then anger." I am an independent woman and voter. This dialogue is an outrage and an insult to all working mothers.

Posted by: Ann | September 3, 2008 8:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment

My family,Baptists who can never vote for a female in a position of power as you state,consider me a heathen as well,,have said this week that ms Palins daughter violated the oath to god and her father of abstinance that she took, an abomination. The family has a weakness of morals,character. To me the fact that the 17 year old bridegroom,the self proclaimed "Redneck who doesnt want to be married or have a child" perhaps needs a bit of seasoning like graduating from high school.

Posted by: mcnertny | September 3, 2008 8:40 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Why would you sit there and judge Governor Palin's daughter? I mean every family has "issues". It doesn't take away the fact that she is a Christian(a strong one). As every person is, even Christian's, are fallen beings. So why judge her daughter? Especially when we have past presidents cheating on their wives(while in office) or other politicians cheating on their wife who has cancer. Why are you going to single out Palin and her daughter? In my eyes the fact that she doesn't have a "perfect" life makes me feel that she will be able to lead this country in a better way:)I will be praying for a McCain/Palin victory.

Posted by: Appalled | September 3, 2008 8:33 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

What's wrong upset you were passed over for a promotion and you had to take it out on someone a little more successful. After reading your article, I am sure Obama will hire you for attack ads. Things are looking up for you.

Posted by: sltiowa | September 3, 2008 8:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment

One might expect that a piece appearing in an "On Faith" section might reflect a more thoughtful appreciation of the faith of the people the author is commenting on. Instead, we have someone who clearly assumes she does not need to engage those views because she already understands what those stupid rednecks believe.

Posted by: Fr. John Whiteford | September 3, 2008 8:27 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Badly written and thought out article. Especially demeaning to working mothers. Just because Sally quit work (and had a rich enough husband to enable her to do so) doesn't mean Sarah should. Sarah Palin married her high school sweetheart and it looks like Bristol Palin will do the same...only a little earlier. Why is this an example of bad parenting?

It might be an example of bad parenting IF YOU'RE A LIBERAL, because a good lib. parent will get his daughter an abortion *tout suite* like BO has obligingly told us: A baby is "punishment for a mistake". Whereas for Sarah Palin a baby is a "gift from God." A SoCon likeSarah Palin likes babies a liberal like Obama doesn't.

Different choices and hard to see why the Dems are so upset. After all, they're the pro-choice party!

Posted by: Johanna Swift | September 3, 2008 8:17 AM
Report Offensive Comment

>> tlrasnic, sw virginia: "Sally has hit the nail on the head and she sure is not some latte liberal."

It was impossible to read the rest of your post since your opening sentence was so laugh out loud funny that I literally had tears coming out of my eyes, thus blocking my vision.

But I'm sure you babbled on about something equally as ridiculous as Sally's hack-like editorial...

Posted by: Tlrasnic makes me laugh | September 3, 2008 8:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I worry about a loose cannon maverick like Sarah Palin having even an indirect access to nuclear weapons.

Beside her connection to the radical Alaska Independence Party (which urges members to "infiltrate" US government), is she connected to any white supremacist groups in Idaho (where she was born and earned a journalism degree)?

People say, "Vice President, well it's not that important." Really? What if the people pushing this candidate Vice President had other plans for her? Look at how the people around Dick Cheney all but controlled the Bush presidency!

By election day, American voters won't know Sarah Palin well enough even to be sure she is mentally stable enough to be trusted within hostage taking distance of our President. She's physically tough enough to be a threat, she uses guns, knives, etc.

Is she really this bad a risk or not? Its just that we don't know! Nobody can be vetted for high office that easily. Look what it takes just to clear a Federal Judge or the head of CIA. Thousands of trusted people are directly involved. Sarah Palin -- unless some other factor is secretly involved -- was cleared in a few months by Sen. McCain's campaign staff.

America doesn't know Sarah Palin at all, no matter how highly McCain values himself as a judge of women or how good the "product placement" and public relations work.

Senator Obama is known in some of the best ways our country provides to earn trust in these matters. He was educated at Harvard Law, was a teacher of constitutional law at University of Chicago for 12 years, and has survived the intense trials of this current campaign.

What was Sarah Palin doing in Alaska in those same years? Her biography, as spun, looks great. But there are warning signs and questions that should have made John McCain pause and say, "No thanks".

What will we learn about Sarah Palin the day after election day and beyond? The Sarah Palin problem looks like a movie where each new surprise is simply more thrilling to watch, but affecting our lives. The Sarah Palin problem arose from an attempt at leadership by rolling dice. Can we know the truth about Sarah in time? We have this 60 day race to the Presidency and the destiny of our country will be set.

I want to close with this: I love our country, the United States of America. My concern comes from a good place in the heart. I hope that voicing my concerns here helps others deciding how to vote.

Posted by: Citizen of Chicago | September 3, 2008 8:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you for articulating my reaction to this choice. I firmly believe that a woman's responsibility to her children - especially at the ages and with the needs these children have - belong with the children. No matter how efficient, how much assistance she has from husband and others, children must come first - even before her job.

Posted by: sjbravo | September 3, 2008 8:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Is she ready to be president? NO! Which unequivocally underscores how Senator Obama is even LESS ready. In the heat of debate Obama draws a straw-man about his campaign size versus Palin's responsibilities as mayor. What a joke - he doesn't even run his campaign - his campaign manager does! Not to mention the true comparison should be regarding her responsibilities as GOVERNOR of Alaska, which carries a budget responsibility 76 times that of Obama's campaign ($11B vs $144M). She has a wealth of experience in energy and has actually managed, led a free-market life, and fought big government. What has Obama done? He is a community organizer - oh great. The sad fact is, while people like Sally Quinn proclaim Governor Palin unfit for the POSSIBILITY of becoming President, they vote for Obama - making an unfit President a CERTAINTY (if elected.)

Posted by: Jon | September 3, 2008 8:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The fact that Sally Quinn was unable to take advantage of a great opportunity has absolutely no bearing on the Sarah Palin situation. To imply otherwise is unequivocal sexism.

Posted by: LarryW | September 3, 2008 8:00 AM
Report Offensive Comment

If Palin were ideologically "correct" for the Left they would be cheering her on.

Her maverick status taking on her own party establishment, her rise from nowhere to become Governor, and doing it all while raising a family.

The classic feminist success tory.

But... she's the wrong kind of woman, as Clarence Thomas was the wrong kind of black man.

So, she must be destroyed by any means possible.

The paranoid ferocity of the Left's attacks only underscore how scared they are of her.

It will only generate more sympathy from real people in that obscure place between NYC and LA called America.

Posted by: jc | September 3, 2008 7:50 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You question Palin's experience? What about the "wind bag" Obama? He has accomplished NOTHING since he has been in public office; all he's done is talk!

Posted by: Donald Ney | September 3, 2008 7:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

3,157 comments and counting!!!!!

Our little Sarah is certainly becoming popular!

I want to know the answer to two questions:

1. What is Sarah cramming, in order to bone up for her debate with Biden.

2. How is Levi going to support Bristol and the baby? You don't suppose some good Christian will offer him a good-paying job?

Posted by: Jamie | September 3, 2008 7:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sounds like you should right about Sports.
Even Obama says stay's out of family.
Whats in your closet????????

Posted by: Southern MD Joe | September 3, 2008 7:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I watched the video of Palin when she talking to those students in June. It over at HuffPo.

My flesh crawled and my stomach turned not when she charged God with executing the battle plan in Iraq, but when her and her minister were talking about prophecies and end-times and telling people to get ready for Alaska's special role as the gathering place for end-times.

She shouldn't even be governor.

Posted by: K Ackermann | September 3, 2008 7:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What kind of mother would knowingly put her teenager through this kind of media slime frenzy to further her own ambitions?

Posted by: Lynn McLure | September 3, 2008 7:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally has hit the nail on the head, & she sure is not some latte liberal.This nation is at its most critical crossroads I have seen in over 60 yrs.We are at war with fundamentalist who believe we are waging another crusade against Islam; our economy, based too long on middle east oil,is in the crapper;millions of our people have no health care, & cannot get any, which is putting an enormous strain on rhe system.So, John McCain picks a pentacostal woman who believes in the rapture( so does the nut in Iran);that the war IS a holy war for christianity;that home schooling is the way to go; that abstinence works!!!; & that she can be the POTUS while submitting to her husband,rocking & changing a downs baby, caring for two other children & supporting a pregnant 17 yr. old.She, John McC & the entire republican convention are in a dream world. They should call Speilberg & get this on film. If the American people vote for this ticket they surely deserve the next halocaust.

Posted by: tlrasnic, sw virginia | September 3, 2008 6:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

And if anybody thinks that commanding the Alaska National Guard is trivial, remember that the Alaskan Air National Guard plays tag with Russian Nuclear Bombers on a regular basis.

[h/t Paul]

Posted by: Britcom | September 3, 2008 6:34 AM
Report Offensive Comment

It seems to me that the media pays to much attention on meaningless issues instead of matters that really affect the U.S.

Posted by: David | September 3, 2008 6:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

1)
What experience and financial expertise does Palin bring to help McCain correct our 9 TRILLION DOLLAR debt?

If the answer is, taxing big oil in Alaska- will she and McCain do that to bring down our deficit?

No- neither have said that. Nor iwll either go against big oil, but continue to prop it up- that dying qucikly diminsihing resource.

2) What is her resolution to the Middle East war and peace?

She is on record as saying she "has no interest in the war in Iraq"

Serious questions- unaddressed or avoided with feel good pump em up cheerleading speeches.

Posted by: VICTORIA | September 3, 2008 6:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess everyone is still waiting for the RNC speech by Palin tomorrow to receive their talking points.

People have strong feelings- but don't seem to know why.

I foresee tomorrow, we'll get bucketloads of parroted history-

NOne of us heard of Palin before Friday- unlss we lived in Alaska.

Yet people are vetting her record vehemently- and they can't even say what it is.

Doesn't anybody, at all- research and investigate and vote for issues?

Posted by: VICTORIA | September 3, 2008 5:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Picking Palin for VP is no worse than picking Barack for President. Barack has been selected simply because he is black. Do you really think they picked him because he is the best man for the job? No. They picked him because he is black. They picked him because if he is elected, it will create an upheaval in American social order. The liberals want to unravel the social fabric of America. They would like to completely destroy all things American: traditional family values, morals, respect for life, patriotism, etc.

Posted by: Eve Blanco | September 3, 2008 5:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn

Every time you, Maureen Dowd, and Donna Brazille dump on Sarah Palin, try to diminish her accomplishments & record, and use her 17 year old daughter's pregnancy as an excuse for your snarky and pseudo-sophisticated comments you push thousands of PUMA'S, independents, and undecided Democrats to vote for the McCain/Palin ticket.

Congratulations for helping to push so many unlikely voters into the Republican tent, even if it's only for this election cycle. Keep it up; Obama is destined to be the next in a long line of the Dem's failed candidates like Dukakis and McGovern.

Posted by: sportsone234 | September 3, 2008 5:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn notes that Palin's job as vice president would keep her from spending time with her minor children. I understand that this may go against the evangelical Christian values that she espouses. But Quinn herself seems to be arguing that Palin should stay home with her children, and I find this stance bizarre in the absence of evidence that Palin's husband can't fill that role. It's doubly bizarre if Quinn herself was a full-time newswoman while raising a handicapped child (although I also understand that being a reporter may be less demanding than being VPotUS and that Palin has not one but five children).

Quinn is much more valid in her concern that Palin might not have been enough of a hands-on mother. No parents can absolutely prevent their teenage daughter from getting pregnant, but it's still not the example the Veep's family should be setting for the nation, if you believe that Americans should look to elected officials as personal role models. I personally do not, because I know how to find my own role models in my own life, so I'm not disturbed if the veep's daughter gets knocked up or if the president fools around with an intern. I just want to make sure Republicans are aware of the double standard of going after Clinton over Lewinski affair and then knowingly nominating someone who may have fallen down on the job of parenting.

All of that said, nobody really knows how Palin's grandchild is going to turn out. You can bet that the Republican Party (and the federal government, too, if McPalin wins the election) will supply the Palins with the best day care and parental support network in history, to keep the family from becoming a national embarrassment. But that won't answer the question of whether the party allows other young, single women the tools they need to avoid situations where children grow up in poverty and neglect.

Posted by: EscoMan | September 3, 2008 5:26 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, first let me say that I am an Obama supporter. In reading your article I must say I totally disagree to the questioning of the parenting of Gov. Palin. She's a human being as is her daughter which makes prone to make mistakes and for that I thank God for His Grace.

I'm so sick and tired about experience and about who has enough vs who doesn't. Nobody really knows until whoever gets elected gets in office, and if experience was really the end all be all, then Jimmy Carter should be running against George Bush Sr. The only candidates with experience who could actually run again.

I think people read into so much stuff that has nothing to do with leadership or the ability to be President of this country. Can a Black man be elected in America? Can a woman? Well its now a 50-50 shot isn't it? Well, sort of. And when its all said and done, before I pass on both may have had the opportunity to be President. Since the bar is set so low due to our current President, both may get their busts on Mt. Rushmore. God is good...All the time!

Posted by: Clark202 | September 3, 2008 5:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally:

I'm neither a Democrat nor a Republican, but a very concerned American.

It's pretty sad to see how a political party can use a woman as a puppet in order to win an election. That's how I perceive this pathetic charade. I think the McCain campaign isn't afraid of Palin's inexperience, they can very well manage her as VP chenney has managed our current president.

What I can hear from either party is just rethoric and more rethoric. Both parties talk about their points of view in many aspects of our lifes, but I think everything stops rights there, just words and alot whole of innaction.

Republicans talk about being Pro-Life but approve the death penalty and supported wars that has killed thousands of children and adults in other coutries (I wonder is those people don't count as human beings to be included in their Pro-Life point of view)

We are tired of just hearing words and we need a goverment that saves lives not one that due to beurocracy and incompetence, let people die because of a hurricane (I bet those victims didn't count in their Pro-Life diatribe either).

I want a goverment that doesn't go to bed with so many coorporations and special interest groups that gets told what to do when it comes to issuing laws and regulations that are supposed to benefit the people (all of us).

We don't have time to be involved in speeches to prove who's more experienced or who is more popular or is Pro-Life or Pro-Choice. We need a president with common sense, one that is capable to identify what is wrong now in America and know what to do or should be done to make it right.

Last campaing flip-flopping was attached to one party only and was really condemned, now I see both parties doing and nobody says anything about it. I think that just became part of America mainstream politics.

We can tell that each party spend millions of dollars in their own campaigns, distorting the truth, spinning their own faults and belittling their opponents. Imagine how many things going wrong now in this country can be turn around with
that money, just imagine.

We need to get more involve and let both parties now that we are listening, we know what is going around and we can't be fool. It would very arrogant for them to think that Americans are not listening and that we can't see through all their charades.

Please, pay attention, do your research, listen carefully, then vote.

Posted by: A concerned American | September 3, 2008 2:56 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy."

Perhaps Ms. Quinn is not aware that considering Alaska's proximity to Russia, Palin has in fact received relevant national security briefings; in my book, that beats living in Indonesia as a child any day. In addition, I'll take Palin's common sense over Obama's three-day process required for him to come up with the correct response; i.e., Iran is a tiny country...no threat, his feeble attempt to draw moral equivalence between Russia/Georgia and America/terrorists, undivided/divided Jerusalem.

"When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?"

I am offended that you insult women by assuming Palin would tell the country, in effect, 'take two aspirin and call me in the morning.' Yes, children come first, but conservatives realize that if their children don't have a country, what's the point of taking care of a sick child? I lived at Ground Zero with my children during the Cuban Missile Crisis--in a place very close to Cuba that could have been easily vaporized--not among the Washington elite.

"These are dangerous and trying times for the entire world."

You must be hallucinating if you think Obama/Biden truly understand that danger.

"This is no time to to play gender politics."

Again, you insult; it apparently did not even occur to you that McCain might actually think Palin is the most qualified to give the country confidence that McCain/Palin put the country first rather than "me first."

Your column alone clearly exhibits that feminism has been a fake; Palin is the epitome of what you claimed you wanted for women. Liberal ideology obviously trumps your alleged desire for women to achieve...very revealing.

Posted by: Suzanne Carpenter | September 3, 2008 2:43 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Since Sarah Palin is running for Executive Office, lets compare Elected Leadership experience:

Sarah Palin has been:
* Governor of Alaska
* Mayor of Wasilla Alaska
* President of the Alaska Conference of Mayors

Hillary Clinton has been:
* President of the Wellesley (college) Young Republicans
* President of the Wellesley College Government Association

Barack Obama has been:
* ?

Joe Biden has been:
* ?

John McCain has been:
* ?

It looks like Gov. Palin is the best qualified by virtue of having the most experience.

Posted by: Britcom | September 3, 2008 2:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Well, ms. Quinn,
You just go on believing that Mrs. Palin is the wrong choice for the wrong reason. Several weeks ago I responded to a survey from the republican party. In it I commented that a sure way for the McCain to win was to select a minority: a woman, or an ethic minority (for example Colin Powell or Bobby Jindal). There is no confusion or doubt about Palin's ability to balance family matters with her career. Men, and now women, are doing so with regular familiarity. It's no easy job. For you to even hint that Palin is sacrificing her family (that's exactly what you are doing) for her own ambition is ludicrous, if not deprecating to say the least. If you had the fortitude and necessary competence you would still be sitting as the first anchor woman for CBS. But since you lack these qualities, you disparage someone that is capable of fulfilling this challenge. You should be commending Palin rather than even suggesting that she can't possibly serve in dual roles. So much for women's equality.
Vote for McCain. He will set you free.

Posted by: Arthur Parra | September 3, 2008 2:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally:

Let me get this straight. You think it wrong to nominate someone for Vice-president -- because she is a woman -- who has been a governor for less than two full years (and a mayor for 6, and chair of her state's most important commission and co-owner of a fishing business).
But you have no problem with the Democrats nominating someone for President who was only a US Senator for 120 days before running for President, who cannot even run his Senate subcommittee, who has never run a business much less a state.
Obama is the least experienced nominee of a major party (less than four years as a US Senator come December)since the R's nominated Thomas E Dewey against Roosevelt in 1944 (less than two years as governor of New York).
Let's speak the truth here. Geraldine Ferraro had it right months ago: now way Obama would be his party's nominee if he was not an African American.
Palin's biggest weakness is that you don't agree with her on "women's" issues.

Posted by: Jim Hale | September 3, 2008 2:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This again, "When the phone rings at three in the morning"

Hopefully if it's real important, the phone will ring at the Pentagon where nobody ever sleeps. The last person I'd be calling is some sleeping politician at 3 A.M. to figure out what to do next. That's just me though.

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 3, 2008 2:17 AM
Report Offensive Comment

A recipe for frozen flowers and ice cubes

First wash the edible flowers with lukewarm water and place each blossom in an individual ice cube compartment that is half full of water. Flowers float, so if you fill the compartment to the top, that’s where your blossom will appear. To get it in the middle of the cube, the flower has to be frozen first in the half-filled tray, then, an hour or more later, add water to form the top half of the cube. Use distilled water, which makes the clearest cubes. If you use tap water, the cubes may be cloudy when they’re removed from the tray, but when added to drinks they clear up nicely.

Have a dink and go make a baby and forget about all the other people making babies. They are real busy right now and don't care about what you are thinking. Honest to God, they don't!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 2:05 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Let's not underestimate Palin. With Obama running on "Change," Palin cannot be roped in by urging her to follow precedent (e.g. by nagging at her not run for V-P until her children are all grown). Palin shows drive, discipline and ambition energized by political (and religious) principles and beliefs. But those beliefs lie at the extreme right of the Republican Party if not outside it, as evidenced by her forays into Alaska separatism and her support for Pat Buchanan. Her supposedly reformist attacks on corruption in Alaska remind me of what happens after every electoral sweep -- exploit opportunities to demonize the status quo, fire the incumbent civil service, put in your own people and start funding your own earmarked, pork-barrel projects ($27 million to her own small town; money from the Bridge to Nowhere plowed into other projects). She might look like a Republican who virtuously drove out corruption from her own party. But Palin belongs to a wing (or fringe) of the Republican Party that has been working and waiting to take power; and John McCain's "marverick" role is being used as a lever. This is not about mothering (liberal or conservative), it's about power. If Dick Cheney could play puppet-master to George Bush, others can do the same with Gov. (and maybe some day President) Sarah Palin. Do we want her to have power over us? If we don't, we need to work the issues. Palin "chose" to have Trig, says Timothy. Yes, and she is against choice for victims of rape and incest. Let's take a look at the rest of her social agenda and practice. Her positions on climate change are out there. She believes in intelligent design. She has an interest in censoring library books. What's her position on Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security,and so on. Do you want this woman running your life and depriving YOU of choices you value and depend on?

Posted by: js | September 3, 2008 1:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am impressed by Palin.
As a man and a patriot I think her choice was the smartest move that McCain ever made, although I don't care much about McCain.
Palin's history and her long standing success in every thing she did portend success in handling any political social and financial problem that she might encounter as VP or president of this country.
God bless Sarah and God bless America.

Posted by: kammoon | September 3, 2008 1:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Polo has free shipping if you spend 195 bucks. That should get you a shirt and maybe a pair of socks.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 1:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Polo has free shipping if you spend 195 bucks. That should get you a shirt and maybe a pair of socks.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 1:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Bravo! This Independant voter has finally heard a sane voice here. While Mrs. Palin certainly has quite a political career ahead of her, I feel the timing is off. Why now? Why this election? While I certainly feel that women can work and raise a family, most, if not the majority, wait until their children are a little older. Preschool age. Why? Well, as social conservatives like to emphasize, children (& babies!) need both parents and the early years are crucial. Some of the men who are her most vocal supporters, are the same ones who criticize "power women"(on the other side of the political spectrum) who try to do too much and make their families suffer as a result. Simply put, Sarah Palin's children need her. Now. The vice presidency is not a 9-5 job. Not even close! By asking Palin to serve now, McCain has put her in a position of choosing between her family and a promotion up the political ladder. Don't tell me that the VP is some part-time job! Some day, if the Republicans win, Mrs. Palin will look back and realize that she can never have these precious years back. The years that she spent in service to her country, but out of reach to her children. Even now, her teen-age daughter is feeling the intense glare of scrutiny & moral judgement by a national media with no concept of boundaries or tact. So it will go with the rest of her children. How about "Palin 2012 or 2016"? The extra experience will only make her more credible and lessen the "no experience" argument and give her a chance to be the amazing mother I know she is.

Posted by: heather | September 3, 2008 1:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Deacons walk the walk. Politics is more talk the talk and running for the office. It's a different pace. Sometimes you need to walk the line. Babies can't walk, but they do learn and if you can walk you can run. To get along in politics you can never run from a fight. The best thing to do is to stop a fight before it starts. It's too late for prevention, it's never too late for the cure. With all these comments you would think somebody had cancer or something serious. It's as if pregnancy was a dreaded disease and it's going to spread. Get over yourselves.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 1:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow,

If John McCain voiced the reasons you gave as his reasons for not picking Gov. Palin he would have been labeled as a sexist pig.

As far as her pregnant daughter is concerned, I would wish that situation on no parent. As the father of an 18 year old daughter I have dreaded the thought of my daughter coming to me with the news the Palins received. But the one thing that would have and I am sure made it a little better was the ending of the news. Mom, Dad, we are getting married.

As far as experience goes, She, Gov. Palin has held two elected Executive positions. Senator Obama has never held an executive position. The Senator has spent the majority of his US Senate time running for President. He has never, never made a tough decision.

Lets compare the two shall we. Comunity activist, Mayor. First term US Senator, Govorner.
Military hater, Commander in chief of the Alaska National Guard. Running a senate office, Running a state. Can't decide when or can't answer when life begins, Had a down syndrome baby. She is more qualified to be President than he is.

I would feel more comfortable with Gov. Palin a heartbeat away from the presidency than Senator Obama as the President.

Posted by: Wesley Norris | September 3, 2008 1:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"Evangelical women also will have to decide if they will vote against their conscience by voting to put the mother of young children in a job outside the home that will demand so much of her time and energy."

Ms. Quinn, you make it sound like Palin is the one woman show. She has been in politics longer than Obama and has managed to accomplish all of this with her 5 children and very supportive husband. The point is that the concept of a "traditional" family (mom, dad and 2 kids where the mom stays home and dad works all day) is no longer the norm. The changes I have witnessed is that the parents do everything in their power to let their kids have the best opportunities available to them. If that means the mother is the sole or majority bread winner or the dad stays at home with the kids then so be it. I believe these evangelical voters you refer to have an understanding of the struggles of American families and further know that it is not within their power to judge one family unit as better than the other.

The changes we are seeing for women extend far beyond what you give credit to. Palin is able to pursue this career because she has a husband who supports her ambitions. These doors are opened to her because she has an incredible support system, just like McCain does and the fact that she is a woman should have no bearing in the matter.

Despite your arguments against the Palin pick, I believe she will be an excellent Vice President for the United States. She has over and 80% approval rating in Alaska and is paired with one of the most experienced leaders in politics and not to mention, she appeals more to the conservative base than McCain with her pro-life, anti-gay marriage, pro-gun, and anti-excessive spending viewpoints.

Posted by: Kathleen | September 3, 2008 1:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What an absolutely obnoxious article. Yes Palin lacks experience, and that is worthy of serious discussion, which the article almost reaches; however, the fact that she lacks maleness or has a family (oh no, how terrible female) should not be part of the equation.
>For an article apparently positioning itself as progressive on women's equality, why does her "attractive"ness matter, especially enough to be listed as a qualification? This makes the Obama is articulate comment look downright intelligent, as a candidate's attractiveness has even less to do with leadership than articulation.
>"But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother."
Wow, so I guess all the career women out there whose kids get knocked up better look themselves long and hard in the mirror for their failures... What a patently offensive statement, however guised as "possible evangelical concerns." For the record, evangelical leaders are not concerned with this at all. This author is far more concerned with evangelical sentiments about mothers and teen pregnancy than evangelicals themselves. Many good mothers end up with accidents like this, and crappy mothers' daughters may get lucky and not get pregnant. Considering that half of all women will experience an unwanted pregnancy in their lifetimes, and that many teenagers have premarital sex (after all, the difference between a pregnant teen and a merely sexually active one is mostly a crapshoot), who are we to pin this common consequence of sex on Palin's poor mothering, here equated with her decision to be Governor of Alaska?! I wasn't aware that the chastity of one's daughter was a)a qualification for the vice presidency, or b)a litmus test for a mother's involvement or love. Leave the judgment of Palin's mothering and Palin's daughter to Palin's family, as even Obama has done. McCain is on his third marriage and no one's talking about his hands-on involvements or failures in those committments. Obama has made his own mistakes that make many question his judgment, and his VP candidate is a known liar and plagiarizer... Yet Palin is the one whom we are willing to tear apart, whose personal life becomes a demerit?
>"Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months." This author is a woman, but obviously what seems to bother her in these lines is the fact that it's a WOMAN. If you read that sentence with the word man wherever the word is woman, does this sound like a political issue worth bothering with? Aren't we in 2 protracted wars, and in a recession, or something?
It's well known that Palin's husband plays Mr. Mom, as the post put it. Why does it matter that OMG WE HAVE A WOMAN. The kids are being taken care of. The lady's running for office. Unless the kids are running out in the street, who really cares if she has 2 or 5 or if they all have down syndrome if they're being taken care of by the dad and the mom when she has time, which women are legendarily good at finding?
"Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil." So now even grandparents aren't eligible... should the country be run by childless adults only? So we can handle Russian-Georgian conflicts, the whole lot of the Mideast, one's spouse, one's child(ren), the media, one's aides, 2 wars, one's party, a million interest groups, and a weakening, globalizing US economy, but that grandkid's 1st birthday party will tear a VP's time asunder? Seriously...
>"Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well." If the media are that retarded, and they may be, that's on them. It has zilch to do with whether the McCain-Palin ticket is better for AMERICA, which it seems like IS the real issue facing us, although members of the media like this author seem to want to nitpick this woman's family instead of focusing on that.
>"Evangelical women also will have to decide if they will vote against their conscience by voting to put the mother of young children in a job outside the home that will demand so much of her time and energy." Again, the dad's on it. Being governor is not a breeze either, and the kids seem all right so far (pregnancy at 17 in an upper-middle class home is hardly an unbelievable crisis). Having a uterus is not a requirement for being the primary caregiver; millions of families know this from experience, and many where women have been the primary caregiver are failures for a variety of reasons. It is ridiculous to claim that Palin should stay aiming low (governor, but a woman as VP, gee I don't know) because she has babies. Is this the 1940's?! Rather than shooting her down based on preconceptions about gender and the inevitable distribution of childcare in a household, maybe 45 years after the women's movement, we should let the lady try.
>"Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job?...Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?" Perhaps you should ask her husband, who has been holding the fort down so far. Or the state of alaska, where she's been prioritizing their needs just fine. Clinton had a kid, Bush had 2, Obama has a couple. Why does it matter that so much that she has kids and not that they did? Yes, she has 5, but she handled it quite well as gov. Perhaps she can provide a role model for working mothers, many of whom vote, are evangelicals, are poor, are rich, are backbones of their family while working 1 or more jobs... It seems the author is implying that she might miss a meeting (Reagan slept through his, and is a hero) or shirk her duties because Susie got a cold. What an insult. Women the country over are managing work and Susie's colds just fine, and with a good income and a supportive husband it's even more doable.
"He always had to be my first priority." Good for you. That doesn't mean that all women must sacrifice their careers for their children, or risk doing the opposite. Perhaps Palin has more support than this author did. In any case, she's not an idiot, and the slogan of the campaign is country first. Even though she's a woman, she probably knows what she's getting into. Can we talk about the issues instead of gender, please?
>"Of course women can be good mothers and have careers at the same time... A mother's role is different from a father's." If the father sucks, yes, women have to pick up the slack on everything from housecare to advocating at the PTA. Mr. Palin has played Mr. Mom, and families the world over are incredibly flexible in their structures. Essentializing a woman out of a VP because she is a mother and thus must take full care of the children and be distracted by them and put them first is ludicrous, anti-feminist, and antiquated.
Country first, yes, but as a woman I hope to hell that the McCain-Palin ticket wins and shows sexist, women-patronizing doubters that espouse these sorts of arguments that like men women can do whatever the hell we put our minds to, come childcare, hell, or high water.

Posted by: Rosemary Logan | September 3, 2008 1:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

If she were a man, Governor Palin wouldn’t even qualify to be a deacon in most fundamentalist churches:
1 Timothy 3:12 A deacon must be the husband of but one wife and must manage his children and his household well.

Posted by: David Blackburn | September 3, 2008 12:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment

However many times Quinn (who was still giving pajama parties at age 28) and other nanny-state polemicists repeat it, I do not believe a pregnant Bristol Palin is a "17-year-old child."

Posted by: daibhidh | September 3, 2008 12:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The real moving stuff is on paper in ink, secure from the likes of the dislikes. That is why we have safes and presses, to keep some out and lock others in. Goofballs and evil minded nitwits are on servers serving no purpose. Keep your powder and paper dry.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 12:43 AM
Report Offensive Comment

John McCain's selection of Palin, who is quite obviously totally unprepared to govern the most powerful country in the world is scarey!!. People you really need to think here. Do you really want this 72 year old man and a women that is totally ill equipt to have her finger on the trigger. Talking about just the protecting the country from terroist, I sure if they could vote they would be over here in droves pulling the handle for the McCain/Palin ticket. It would be funny if it was not so dangerous.

Posted by: C. Scott | September 3, 2008 12:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment

In God We Trust. Money talks and BS walks. Evil runs from the big guns.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 12:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Anonymous, you truly moved me. I will save you a special place on the beach along poop river. It is a somewhat smelly place, but it is a step up from cankerville.

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 3, 2008 12:27 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Like it or not, Palin is a pawn in this political bloodsport. Had Hillary been on the Dem ticket, Palin would not have been given the time of day. A MAN with the same level, or lack thereof, experience of Palin wouldnt have been given the time of day.


Thompson stated tonight that Palin was chosen as a breath of fresh air to combat the usual, old Washington, Beltway Boy stigma. HELLO!!?!? What the heck does he think McCain represents? Is he sipping his own stupid-laced kool-aid??? I actually like Thompson and had he put a little more fire in his belly, HE would have been a better choice than McCain. I guess he has lost all his stamina keeping up with a much younger wife and his toddlers. Hint hint, Palin.

Palin will be back in Alaska in a few months when this ticket goes up in flames. No doubt. In the meantime, read my lips Mrs. Palin:

A-B-S-T-I-N-E-N-C-E DOES NOT WORK.

Need a referral? It's spelled B-R-I-S-T-O-L.

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 3, 2008 12:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Like it or not, Palin is a pawn in this political bloodsport. Had Hillary been on the Dem ticket, Palin would not have been given the time of day. A MAN with the same level, or lack thereof, experience of Palin wouldnt have been given the time of day.


Thompson stated tonight that Palin was chosen as a breath of fresh air to combat the usual, old Washington, Beltway Boy stigma. HELLO!!?!? What the heck does he think McCain represents? Is he sipping his own stupid-laced kool-aid??? I actually like Thompson and had he put a little more fire in his belly, HE would have been a better choice than McCain. I guess he has lost all his stamina keeping up with a much younger wife and his toddlers. Hint hint, Palin.

Palin will be back in Alaska in a few months when this ticket goes up in flames. No doubt. In the meantime, read my lips Mrs. Palin:

A-B-S-T-I-N-E-N-C-E DOES NOT WORK.

Need a referral? It's spelled B-R-I-S-T-O-L.

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 3, 2008 12:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Why, thank you Anonymous for such a lovely poem about your love for me.

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 3, 2008 12:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Make love, make babies, make America. You are free to make mistakes and free to be happy. Outside it is America it is all good. Words that hurt don't help. Babies are pure love and joy. Here to my love and her babies. An American Dream is a happy heart and a pleased soul.

"Please You"

How my heart longs for yours
To please you is what my heart feels for you
How my lips long to kiss your body
To touch yor skin and feel the softness of you
How my soul calls to you in only dreams you could know
To be next to me and resting in my embrace
Feeling each breath as we lay together
Pleasing you forever and making sweet love
Together making all your senses alive with mine
You take me to a place I long for
I wait for you and know it is love
So it can not hurt to wait longer
You can be with me and I will always wait for you
My lonesome tears will never dry
My eyes see you always here for me like a child
They long to see you and my hand longs to hold
Your hand and your heart is all my desire
How these words could not be without you
How such a love could save me is your grace
I felt I could not be good enough
You showed me how good love could make life
I found my true self because you inspired me
To search for you my whole life was my purpose
To find you was my dream come true
Now my heart is happy knowing you are there
So much more than good enough
It is a love so great that it is for more than two
If these words find you sad please be not sad
Know how deeply I care for you
How I feel you with me was written long ago
You only know how I feel and only for you
I will remember you and you will not pass me by
Without knowing you should remember the love
You feel so strong that all your pain is past
You will never feel that pain again
For I long to please you and make your soul pleased
That is what binds us and I can hold you in these sweet dreams of the future in love with you
You are always my first love and lasting passion
You are love
You are beautiful

Written for You

Posted by: Anonymous | September 3, 2008 12:19 AM
Report Offensive Comment

America need to get back to its fundamental roots. Let us become root farmers and burn our books. Let us tear up the evil "Internets." Howoooooooooo howoooooooo. Let us now pray in TONGUES!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 3, 2008 12:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment

So the left wines and wines and never moves to said enemy hell hole after an election so lets make them this time or simply eliminate them! Not like they matter much except to rouse ill will between men!

Posted by: Ok | September 3, 2008 12:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This article is an insult to women.

Posted by: hcleal | September 3, 2008 12:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Remember when my disciple Son of Sam acted on his voices?

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 3, 2008 12:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"Her life experience alone gives her wisdom...now thats a real qualification to lead!"

Ooooh stop it, you make the most evil one laugh. But it is true that those with such wisdom TALK IN TONGUES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Decipher that gibberish and act on the message!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 3, 2008 12:07 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ma'am: You are completely wrong on McCain and Palin? Have you ever heard of a battlefield commission? McCain as an old Navy hand knows some of the best officers in the Navy and Marines were not from Harvard, Columbia, Yale or Annapolis. They were officers who rose up through the ranks through their courage, steadiness and leadership skills. They were challenged and they responded. Sarah Palin is like this. Consider her promotion a battlefield commission for meritorious service. As McCain has long experience both as an executive, a Naval Officer and as a Senate leader, I trust his judgment on Palin.

Palin's rise is meteoric no doubt. Historically, it can only be compared to the rise of Lincoln and TR. Her rise is even more impressive than the rise of another great president -with less experience than Palin- Harry Truman. One cannot help but think her rise is providential and her we have our first woman president -not in 2008- she is too green for that but for 2012 and beyond.
There can be no doubt Sarah Palin has made history and will have a great future in American politics win or lose this election. Yes, win or lose. Because if it is a close election that closeness will be her triumph.

She is not 32. She is not applying for the insignificant job of a taking head. She is not even applying for the first spot as Obama is even though she has far more executive experience and work experience than Obama. She may even have published more journalism than Obama. From what I have heard of her and from what I have read this is a very well-informed person. She may not have the views of a Washington insider who hobnobs on Embassy row, but she has the views and values that will resonate with heartland America.

I was undecided ten days ago. My wife was undecided. Many of our friends and coreligionists were undecided. But now most of us are enthusiastic supporters of the McCain-Palin ticket. Mac choice was a revolution, in my opinion, and I feel that history will prove my intuition that we are witnessing the beginning of something important that will be remembered long after Obama and Biden are just aa footnote in history.

LET US HOPE AND LET US PRAY
MAC AND PALIN ALL THE WAY

RICHARD K. MUNRO

Posted by: Richard K. Munro | September 3, 2008 12:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Soon folks like Jimbo, Jack and Jill will be burning and drowning witches. It will be so delicious. I can't wait!

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 3, 2008 12:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah will be a great VP. Sally and some of my progressive friends are having a hissy fit over this. But as a Hillary supporter i am now voting for McCain/Palin! Her life experience alone gives her wisdom...now thats a real qualification to lead!

Posted by: hjb | September 3, 2008 12:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Please review Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. You, my dear are breaking the law.

Posted by: Liz | September 3, 2008 12:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

STOP!!!!!! Let's come to our senses. She's the VP candidate and these issus are not worth the candle, especially considering the downside. Like a pack of raging dogs, we are reflexively snapping and biting our way into yet another McCain trap that will open the door to more damaging scrutiny on Obama's weaknesses--inexperience and dirty Chicago politics. With a candidate that exudes such confidence and the broad assumption everywhere for so many months that the election is ours, I think that we Democrats have moved from focused confidence to the lazy, pompous arrogance exemplified by this article. Unfortunately, we will lose if we don't start playing both hard AND SMART again, but right now we seem to senselessly bully away at any and all "issues". Stop being tactically retarded!!! Pick the right fights!!!

Posted by: Jon | September 3, 2008 12:00 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn says:

"...with news that Palin's 17-year-old unmarried daughter is pregnant, McCain's pick may not even find support among 'family values' voters."

Gee, Sally, reading the thousands upon thousands of galvanized pro-Palin respondents here and on other websites, it seems otherwise. And, it seems the hugely influential conservative base, as a whole, is just a wee bit energized.

It seems that the entire premise of your article is shot to hell.

Just a thought, Sally.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 11:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Jack Jenson: "It's hard when your kids are going to Sidwell friends at 30k per year to imagine what is going on in real America."

Yes Jack, make sure the kids don't know anything but jack shirt. Make America strong. Did you know that you can shave if you catch a bee in a clam shell and then rub it on your face? Yes, it is true. It must be. I saw it on TV.

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 2, 2008 11:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I was appalled at the CNN interview Sally Quinn gave this afternoon regarding this article. It was condescending, righteous and bigotted. As a psychoherapist, I feel the lady doth protest too much in an attempt to bolster her own agenda. Talk about being insulting to women and being concerned that a "child" of one of our candidates is pregnant out of wedlock. I found this whole article and interview to be the epitomy of insult to women and downright abusive to this young girl who is trying to make a difficult situation right. I tell my clients that criticizing other's parenting can be very dangerous as we never know how things will turn out for our own children and grandchildren. I know many extremely involved and devoted parents who have found themselves in the position of Sarah Palin. It had nothing to do with their parenting. None of us can be with our children 24/7. It is egocentric to believe that only a mother can raise and give children the love that they need. It is an insult to every father, who as a single parent, has done a wonderful job raising his children. It is an insult to the many wonderful men and women who are in the role of surrogate parents when the mother is working or absent. This need not be the case with Governor Palin's children. Children are not "distractions" but "people" whom we love, cherish and care for despite our vocations. Being a strong role model for our children by participating in public service and righting wrongs and corruption are gifts that positively affect their character for a lifetime. Every President in history has faced this dilemma of spending time with his children and it is ridiculous to say that all these chilren have suffered because of the office. Sally Quinn knows nothing of the mother that Palin has been or who she will be in the future--and no one has the right to judge her when the evidence does not exist. Good for you, Sally, that you took time off your pontificating for the media to raise your special needs child. But, this is not about YOU and you have no right to use your platform to malign women and children who have chosen other paths than you.

Posted by: Anita Maier | September 2, 2008 11:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

JoAnne Heron says:

"If I weren't so afraid of who she is and what she believes, I would cheer her on, but I can't. She is dangerous because of her convictions..."


C Gruen says:

"...I write as a sister in Christ, and voter who is consistently pro-life and already committed to Obama."


Yes, we're wading in it up to our eyebrows now, folks!

These "independent women" are "concerned" about Palin as VP. Thankfully, they have the street-activist radical totalitarian "above my pay grade" leftist senator-trainee at the top of the Dem ticket.

ROTF!

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 11:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow I just heard about this post by Sally Quinn and I guess I am really shocked.

For many years I have read with great interest Sally's columns. This really sounds like a wrap up from a Beltway Cocktail party hosted by the media elites. Was EJ Dionne and Sally Reimer pouring the champagne?

Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan had no Washington experience. Whether you were a Democrat or Republican you cannot say they didnt do well.

It's hard when your kids are going to Sidwell friends at 30k per year to imagine what is going on in real America. Sally what a really low mark in your esteemed career to attack another woman in this manner in an effort to support your candidate. Wow. really sad

Posted by: Jack Jensen | September 2, 2008 11:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Got to go now, Feynman will giving his next in a series of lectures on the theory of quantum electrodynamics. It is sinful to miss one. After that, I will poke him with hot branding irons.

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 2, 2008 11:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You're next Hawking!

gaagaaa hobledegaga! TONGUES TONGUES

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 2, 2008 11:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Love the assumptions that family-values people are too judgmental to separate Palin's actions from those of her teen daughter. Nice little jab in there, too, about her not being a "hands-on" (translation: unfit) mother.
Also love the assumption that because Quinn floundered at CBS, the logical conclusion is that Palin can't be successful as v-p. Elitist logic, I suppose.
Yep, it sounds like Palin needs to stay in the kitchen and let elites like Biden make life's decisions.
Essays like this remind me of the liberals' real disconnect: they believe the only smart people in America are rich attorneys. This is why her party gets shocked so often in November.

Posted by: abe hardesty | September 2, 2008 11:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I regret to inform the living fornicators that Einstein, Newton, Galileo, Max Planck, Euler, Lorentz, Rutherford, Joule, Boyle, Bohr, Helmholtz, Faraday, Maxwell, Davy, Ohm, Volta, Franklin et al. are all with me now. They burn for all eternity.

Make sure to teach your children the correct science, i.e., that which was taught by Hanna Barberra. The way Fred, Wilma and Dino carried themselves is the standard Americans should strive to achieve and maintain!

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 2, 2008 11:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin would make a great poster mother for the perfect Christian Republican Woman or Mrs. America for her obvious multiple talents and balancing act, but she is not running for Mrs. America (does that exist anymore?) I am very concerned about the possibility of her running the country.

Alaska is an odd place. Recently, we tried to find an open restaurant in Wasilla on a Sunday, and were almost unsuccessful, except for a Mexican Restaurant with no Mexicans. That was a first, as we are used to having all wait staff and cooks Mexican. Guess the town was closed down like in the old days. Everybody was at church. (My son lives 10 miles away in Palmer.)

In Talkeetna, Alaska, the bachelors have an "Alaskan woman" contest where the contenders have to bake a pie, run uphill in "bunny boots" (extreme cold weather bulky footwear) with a pail of water, and shoot at a target while skiing through the woods. (There are many more things), and Sarah definitely fits this mold. The winner gets two free tickets to Hawaii. (This was 15 years ago. Please research if you use this reference.) I guess the bachelors hope they will get an invitation. I have a friend who won it at least twice, and I'm sure Sarah would have done quite well.

I am a former Alaskan and would normally think this and all of the things that have been said about Sarah and all of the conflicts surrounding her are funny. It's just that they are not.
There are huge problems here, including denial.

She cannot keep control over her own life and family, much less over a country and a world she knows little about. I am embarrassed at myself for being so obsessed with this story, but I think it is my Alaskan history, the fact that I too, tried to balance motherhood and a job (in Alaska with only one child), and that in my own larger family, I have the extreme right and left. I also identify with her on some level as a woman, and I am caught in the middle of what feminism means in this instance. Does it mean supporting a woman no matter what stupid choices she makes? My mothering instincts also get mixed up in there somewhere.

I think about the pregnancy, which also happened with my niece with the same view of abortion. What about the young man, who has a foul mouth, is obviously some kind of egotistical high school stud, who is into himself heavily and doesn't want kids. What kind of marriage will this be? Who is going to take care of Sarah's family? Will they move to Washington? I know in my own son that it is impossible to take the Alaska out of the child. They will never be happy. Alaska men can only stand so much of being inside. Who is going to home school them? The hyprocrasy here really bothers me. This is not family values, and so, am I not a feminist for raising these questions?

Lastly, I will say what I have not heard this observance in articles or on blogs. Whenever I go to Alaska, (and I go every year), I experience a love/hate relationship with the culture. Sarah epitomizes Alaskan culture. People move there to get away from rules, to make their own, to operate independently, to hunt, shoot, whatever they want, do whatever they want, don't want the government involved, unless it is to bring pork to their community.

If I weren't so afraid of who she is and what she believes, I would cheer her on, but I can't. She is dangerous because of her convictions, but on some level I understand her as a woman.

Well, won't this be an interesting campaign? JH

Posted by: JoAnne Heron | September 2, 2008 11:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What twisted logic!
Sally, you are a sick woman in need of help.
I'll pray that you stop hiding from the truth.

Posted by: not surprised | September 2, 2008 11:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

On the issue of Palin's role as mother and grandmother...
I can't help but wonder how Palin would react if her pregnant daughter had a medical emergency, like eclampsia, which is more common in teenagers than in adults. Of course, we all pray that this doesn't happen, but the reality is that doctors sometimes have to recommend an abortion to save the life of the mother. It's a tragedy but it happens every day. Would Palin toe the Republican party line, a party which recently adopted a platform which opposes abortion and makes no exceptions for the health of the mother? I can't believe she would do that.

Posted by: Dr. Michael Pugh, Jr. | September 2, 2008 11:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin would make a great poster mother for the perfect Christian Republican Woman or Mrs. America for her obvious multiple talents and balancing act, but she is not running for Mrs. America (does that exist anymore?) I am very concerned about the possibility of her running the country.

Alaska is an odd place. Recently, we tried to find an open restaurant in Wasilla on a Sunday, and were almost unsuccessful, except for a Mexican Restaurant with no Mexicans. That was a first, as we are used to having all wait staff and cooks Mexican. Guess the town was closed down like in the old days. Everybody was at church. (My son lives 10 miles away in Palmer.)

In Talkeetna, Alaska, the bachelors have an "Alaskan woman" contest where the contenders have to bake a pie, run uphill in "bunny boots" (extreme cold weather bulky footwear) with a pail of water, and shoot at a target while skiing through the woods. (There are many more things), and Sarah definitely fits this mold. The winner gets two free tickets to Hawaii. (This was 15 years ago. Please research if you use this reference.) I guess the bachelors hope they will get an invitation. I have a friend who won it at least twice, and I'm sure Sarah would have done quite well.

I am a former Alaskan and would normally think this and all of the things that have been said about Sarah and all of the conflicts surrounding her are funny. It's just that they are not.
There are huge problems here, including denial.

She cannot keep control over her own life and family, much less over a country and a world she knows little about. I am embarrassed at myself for being so obsessed with this story, but I think it is my Alaskan history, the fact that I too, tried to balance motherhood and a job (in Alaska with only one child), and that in my own larger family, I have the extreme right and left. I also identify with her on some level as a woman, and I am caught in the middle of what feminism means in this instance. Does it mean supporting a woman no matter what stupid choices she makes? My mothering instincts also get mixed up in there somewhere.

I think about the pregnancy, which also happened with my niece with the same view of abortion. What about the young man, who has a foul mouth, is obviously some kind of egotistical high school stud, who is into himself heavily and doesn't want kids. What kind of marriage will this be? Who is going to take care of Sarah's family? Will they move to Washington? I know in my own son that it is impossible to take the Alaska out of the child. They will never be happy. Alaska men can only stand so much of being inside. Who is going to home school them? The hyprocrasy here really bothers me. This is not family values, and so, am I not a feminist for raising these questions?

Lastly, I will say what I have not heard this observance in articles or on blogs. Whenever I go to Alaska, (and I go every year), I experience a love/hate relationship with the culture. Sarah epitomizes Alaskan culture. People move there to get away from rules, to make their own, to operate independently, to hunt, shoot, whatever they want, do whatever they want, don't want the government involved, unless it is to bring pork to their community.

If I weren't so afraid of who she is and what she believes, I would cheer her on, but I can't. She is dangerous because of her convictions, but on some level I understand her as a woman.

Well, won't this be an interesting campaign? JH

Posted by: JoAnne Heron | September 2, 2008 11:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

It's amazing that John McCain effectively said that, of all the people in the country that he would personally choose to be president, this woman is his first choice.

But trying to spin the Palin pregnancy issue as some wonderful evidence of her character is beyond moronic because any good family should stand behind their daughter, no matter what their politics are.

Secondly, it's obviously a POLITICAL expediency to push the two kids into marriage, a life long commitment for which they may not even be at all suited. Of all things, it's now the Republicans who seem to be equating readiness for marriage simply with functioning genitals. Because people are ambitious beyond belief and immersed in illogical belief systems, they bypass the necessary thinking about the actual welfare of the young people.

Just because they made a mistake and she's now pregnant doesn't mean that they are at all ready for marriage. Whatever happened to the idea of people marrying because they're mature enough, that they have enough life experience and have gone through enough counseling to make an informed decision? All of the people involved are very vocal on abstinence, family values, etc. and the sanctity (not convenience) of marriage. But the message here is that if abstinence fails and they get pregnant everything will be made all right by having these children marry...and they are children. And looked at clearly it's more of a punishment of the two children so that the family (and the religious right) can spin it as some wonderful, noble thing.

It would have taken real guts for the family to just acknowledge the situation and say that the child will be raised within the family and the daughter will have responsibilities, etc. Then, if the couple prove to have the necessary maturity, actual love and devotion over time, etc. They could and should marry.

But not until then.

Actually, Palin's first indication of lack of good judgment was accepting the invitation to take a job that she's admittedly uninformed about and not qualified for. The next indication was her prioritizing her political ambitions above the significant, complex responsibilities that her daughter's pregnancy adds to her family obligations.

Oh yeah, I'm not voting for Obama either. Neither of the candidates are qualified to lead the country, as time will again prove. But this is a country that loves to live on image, spin and fantasy, which has gotten us into this no-win situation...along with plenty of others.

Michael Horn

Posted by: Michael Horn | September 2, 2008 11:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You know, action speaks louder than words

Look at all the Republican hierarchy,

McCain, Fred Thompson, Newt Gingrich, all of them have dumped their wives and married younger women. Obama is through and through a family man. Evangelicals? Hypocrites -all of them. And what do they think of women? Look to their leaders. And yes, I mean it. Their leaders are all politicians, not religious leaders.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 11:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I love the way you liberal women,turn into mean liberal men whenever a real woman enters the room. Get used to it

Posted by: republican | September 2, 2008 11:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

afafa gata notobologot tepolitarytonagu! TONGUES TONGUES TONGUES!!!!!

TONGUES will fornicate in the pentecostal house of the lord our savior Mack the Knife. afafa gata notobologot tepolitarytonagu! TONGUES TONGUES TONGUES!!!!!

She speaketh in the holy tongues of the holy spirit and eat raw moose. Matthew 6:29:1

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 2, 2008 11:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You know, action speaks louder than words

Look at all the Republican hierarchy,

McCain, Fred Thompson, Newt Gingrich, all of them have dumped their wives and married younger women. Obama is through and through a family man. Evangelicals? Hypocrites -all of them. And what do they think of women? Look to their leaders.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 11:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your reactions and analysis are absolutely on target -- and I write as a sister in Christ, and voter who is consistently pro-life and already committed to Obama.

Posted by: C Gruen | September 2, 2008 11:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just because Sally was a failure at age 32, she believes Sara will be a failure at age 44. Her beliefs are not supported by the facts. I can only believe that Sally has continued her failing performance since age 32. Maybe Sally should try a career change. Cleaning motel rooms does not pay much, but she might be good at it, and she might enjoy it. Give it a try Sally.

Posted by: Ralph Rivera | September 2, 2008 11:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Okay, I'm done with this. Apparently you cannot bring up a valid concern with such crazies.

Posted by: seville | September 2, 2008 11:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

No, YOU are cynical and calculated. This is the perfect VP selection at the right time. If McCain selected Tom Ridge and it was "calculated" to win PA then isn't THAT cynical? Ms. Palin is everything McCain -- and many, many Republicans -- and many, many Americans -- want in a VP. And she happens to be a woman. Or does that automatically disqualify her in the strange perverted world of Washington, which is the only place you seem to reside. Get out. Meet some real Americans. We LIKE strong women. And then get over how Republicans are the feminists and Obama is not.
JDE
Irving, Texas

Posted by: John Evans | September 2, 2008 11:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sounds like Sally Quinn has a jealous streak toward Mrs. Palin because she is quite an attractive woman. She was elected governor of a state, that qualifies her in my book. Governors run an entire state, senators like Clinton and Obama don't run squat. Oh woo, i just got a look at Horseface Quinn's picture above, woman jealousy for sure ....

Posted by: Rockhard50 | September 2, 2008 11:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Zane says:

"The writer seem to be unaware of the fact that the person with the LEAST experience is at the TOP of the Democratic ticket."

Exactly! Imagine that, the liberal mainstream media thinking we can't add two and two.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 11:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are so partisan, this is not worth a comment beyond this period.

Posted by: Country first | September 2, 2008 11:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Slick Will's several undisclosed half breed children, shotgun fornicating and oval office rape of a half brained invalid; Hillary's acceptance of that and her lesbian experimenting; the indiscriminate use of drugs in and around the White House; Bill's deserting this Country's military; his lies to Congress and to the People; his sentencing to fine and suspension from the Bar for criminal perjury............none of that disturbed your sensitive ethics. You see fit to pass judgment upon pre nuptial sex of two young adults, who are about to marry. How much prenuptial homo and etero sex did Hillary have at Wellesley and Yale. Have you bothered to inquire??? You see fit to pass judgment on a kid ...and her mother. Shame on you. you are a disgrace on womanhood

Posted by: michael petrone | September 2, 2008 11:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Can Sarah think without a script?"

Well, we know she can read a Teleprompter. Barely.

She has obviously failed to teach her daughter the difference between right and wrong. How can she be trusted to run the country, or even preside over the Senate?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 11:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Slick Will's several undisclosed half breed children, shotgun fornicating and oval office rape of a half brained invalid; Hillary's acceptance of that and her lesbian experimenting; the indiscriminate use of drugs in and around the White House; Bill's deserting this Country's military; his lies to Congress and to the People; his sentencing to fine and suspension from the Bar for criminal perjury............none of that disturbed your sensitive ethics. You see fit to pass judgment upon pre nuptial sex of two young adults, who are about to marry. How much prenuptial homo and etero sex did Hillary have at Wellesley and Yale. Have you bothered to inquire??? You see fit to pass judgment on a kid ...and her mother. Shame on you. you are a disgrace on womanhood

Posted by: michael petrone | September 2, 2008 11:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, a crazy redneck chick for vice president. See how we are! This country has already gone down the crapper.

And, afafa gata notobologot tepolitarytonagu! TONGUES TONGUES TONGUES!!!!!

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 2, 2008 11:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Another truckload of sour grapes by a former feminist turned into a chauvanist.

Posted by: ron s | September 2, 2008 11:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

To Seville, and the "other" posters who are "oh so concerned,"

The false righteousness ain't playing, dears.

The pretend unctuousness ain't playing. You're not even fooling yourselves that it is. It will continue not to play, as long as you insist on trying it. It will only continue to galvanize everyday normal folks in their support for Palin.

You're way out of your league if you think this is an issue.

We're a public that saw Bill Clinton cavorting in the oval office. A 17-year-old daughter getting pregnant by her husband-to-be is not going to sway one voter against Palin.

The added publicity will only help her.

PS, if you libs are going to post here pretending to be "concerned independents," at least show a tattered shred of remaining integrity and consistently post using the same name; these sock-puppet posts are just too obvious. But I guess intellectual honesty is asking too much from liberals.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 11:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I support the Palin's in the handling of the issues in their family. I am the father of four daughters, the youngest of which is now 19 years old. Every honest father will tell you that even with the best of efforts to pass on your morals to your children, inevitably those same children are to become adults with their own free will and the responsibility that comes with it. To have to go through all this in the public eye while cynical journalists hurl petty barbs causes an intense and instinctive revulsion in me. How more sexist can one be than to suggest that Palin would be distracted with children, but Obama would not?! How much more misogynist can one be than to say that a woman has a choice to abort or keep her child, then ridicule her for making her choice?

Posted by: Matt | September 2, 2008 11:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The writer seem to be unaware of the fact that the person with the LEAST experience is at the TOP of the Democratic ticket. If elected, no one will need to die for him to take office.

The editorial was, at best, offensive.

Posted by: zane | September 2, 2008 11:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WE are talking the here and now and family values. I am wondering what is different in a child becoming an unwed mother is worse that a drug addiction. We all know Obama has had a drug addiction to COCAINE..............and the sllure of that drug is always with that former addict.

Posted by: Eileen | September 2, 2008 11:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm shocked that women like Sally Quinn attack Sarah Palin as a vice presidential candidate because she's a mother. Ms. Quinn holds mothers and fathers to different standards. Does she not think Sen. Obama's top priority are his young children?

I believe that Gov. Palin wants the very best for her children, and I applaud her for becoming involved in politics in order to insure a brighter future for her children. Mr. Palin is a supportive husband and father, and the Palins, like most American families, do what it takes to make ends meet.

If Sen. McCain has survived 4 bouts of cancer, his health must be extremely strong!

Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2008 11:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

All right! Speaking in tongues is back in vogue!!!

gaga baba booboo tglarfaliaverminaotleter!

Posted by: The Devil, THE DEVIL! | September 2, 2008 11:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My - what an attack against having a woman in the presidency. And from what appears to be a liberal democrat. I must say, I'm confused by your reasoning, which has all of the earmarks most people would, wrongly, attribute to an exremely conservative person of faith. So, if I understand this corrently, in essence, you're saying that it's fine for a woman to be president, vice president, or hold any other public office, provided she's already raised her kids - because obviously, a woman's place is in the home. Huh.

I am, by the way, a Christian conservative who has been in the workplace, and left the workplace to raise my kids, and returned to the workplace. I have gone from extremely liberal in my youth and immaturity to being more considered and responsible as I've grown up. I have also suffered with the humiliation and indignation of being offered a management position because they wanted a woman in the position, regardless of qualifications. This position, by the way, was offered to me by the hiring committee of a liberal university in California. I turned that position down. I prefer to obtain a position on my merits rather than my gender.

Personally, I am thrilled with Sarah Palin. Having relatives in Alaska, I understand how difficult governing in that part of the country can be. I believe that, as Vice President, she is in a position to allow her intellect, which is quick, and her leadership skills, which are strong, to be honed to the point of being a successful President. She has shown herself to be a regular person - not a lifelong politician, not a charismatic charmer - a person, who will work for what she believes in. She addresses issues forthrightly, as with her "Troopergate" supposed scandal, and any other "questionable" items the main stream media wishes to dredge up about her. She announces her frailties and faults - things every human person has - immediately and honestly, and does not attempt to hide them or spin them into someone elses responsibility.

So - for me, speaking as a republican conservative Christian working woman - way to go John McCain for your pick. I'm excited about Sarah Palin as our next Vice President.

Posted by: Christy | September 2, 2008 11:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally - you don't find it cynical; you find it downright scary that McCain has picked a game changer.

Quite frankly, I find it "cynical" and "insulting" that you pretend to be a journalist when in fact you are just another one of Nobama's media lapdogs. Do you, like Chris Matthews, get a funny feeling racing down your leg when you are sitting up on Nobama's lap writing your next anti-McCain hit piece?

Instead of attacking a young 17 year old girl, why don't you spend time investigating your master's relationship with Bill Ayers, the radical left-wing anarchist member of the 1960s Weather Underground terrorist organization? Or perhaps you could contemplate the relative inexperience of the top of your party's ticket w/the bottom of the GOP ticket (yes, Palin actually has more political experience than your master, Barrack Nobama.)

Oh, and as a "family values" voter myself, I'm damn proud of her. I know that in your world it's okay to discard human life for personal convenience and abandon personal responsibility. That is the world of moral relativism that you and those of your ilk have adopted. Therefore, it's only natural that you wouldn't understand how support for Palin remains strong. Pathetic.


Posted by: NObama/Marx08 | September 2, 2008 11:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The writer seems to be unaware of the fact that the person with the LEAST experience is at the TOP of the Democratic ticket. If elected, no one will need to die for him to take office.

The editorial was, at best, offensive.

Posted by: zane | September 2, 2008 11:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama is a political hack street-activist with a reprehensible, ultra-liberal voting record that even he doesn't want to talk about.

The Obama-drones, in trying to downplay his glaring lack of qualifications and experience, have resorted to citing his Harvard Law experience. That's nice.

Obama talks about 57 states, wants to have a nice talk with Ahmedinejad, and thinks the answer to the energy crisis lies in windmills and tire gauges. (The buffoon talks about alternative energy as if he invented it; it's been around for decades.)

He comes up with these "visionary" ideas when he isn't too busy denouncing his own supporters or trying to stamp out any discourse concerning his Wright, Ayers, and Rezko connections.

His extremely short stint in the Senate was full of holes where he voted "present" -- when he wasn't voting ultra-liberal. Much of his time in Senate was spent campaigning. Apparently, being a senator grew old rather quickly for Teleprompter Barry.

The guy is out of whack, way out of the mainstream. He's a power-hungry totalitarian control freak.

Instead of citing his positions, he himself says the answers are "above his pay grade."

For his running mate, he picks an entrenched old-boy Washington liberal who got bounced back by the voters anytime he even thought of getting to the White House -- apparently someone high up in the Dem party thought Obama needed a "reliable" string-puller for his affirmative-action candidacy -- hence the extremely uninspired and uninspiring pick of Plagiarizin' Joe Biden. Biden brings nothing, not even the mainstream media's favorite noun, "gravitas." Biden was a wasted pick.

So much for the brilliant and uhh-uhh articulate Barack Obama.

Palin is rock-solid on the issues, she has strong convictions, executive experience, a history of taking on the establishment; she has guts and, unlike Hillary, she moved up the political ladder on her own steam. Next to Obama, Palin is amazingly qualified. And she's only the VP pick, while the amazing empty-headed Obama is the Presidential nominee. The Dems tossed Hillary over the side for this flake.

Don't even get me started on McCain's qualifications compared with Obama.

Teleprompter Barry is going to get slammed in the debates.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 11:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Eileen - who said I am voting for Obama or approving of his drug use? You have no idea what I have said about that. I simply said W used cocaine and there's a good chance you voted for him. I pity what we have to present to our children these days in terms of role models - Sarah Palin in no way is a role model, nor is her daughter.

Posted by: seville | September 2, 2008 11:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

One more point about women saying home. Believe it or not, women CAN successfully lead powerful countries (Queen Elizabeth, Margaret Thatcher, etc...), and men CAN be home makers. Do you really think MR. Palin will keep his day job if his wife is elected vice president????

Posted by: Russell | September 2, 2008 11:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find it funny that you slam McCain for choosing this woman for VP with 5 children, yet its ok for Democratic women to run for office with 5 children. I think this woman scares you. She has more to offer as a Vice President then Obama has as THE President. I like the fact that she is a conservative, I like the fact she is not from Washington, I like the fact that is a member of the NRA, I like the fact her husband works in the oil industry! We need people who know more about that then I do. I like the fact she is not afraid of the media and chose to accept the opportunity McCain has given. That says to me that she won't be afraid of the Pelosi's and Biden's. I can not wait for the VP debate! I think you doth protest too much! Your Obama pin is a little crooked and your green eyeshadow is begining to run. I say all of this as a guy from Minnesota.

Posted by: Hal G. | September 2, 2008 11:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Joe Biden has been in the congress longer than John McCain, so does that make him more qualified than McCain? Maybe what this country is yearning for is to get normal, everyday, people with some common sense in positions of responsibility and power, because God knows the liberal establishment,including Sally Quinn, have thououghly messed things up for the last fourty plus years. More power to Sarah Palin

Posted by: Jim Leyland | September 2, 2008 11:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You know, all your comments said about Palin being picked because she's a woman can be said about Obama because he's half black. Last I checked 92% of black voters were voting for Obama. Don't even try to tell me that they believe this guy is the best man suited for the job. Obama has no executive experience, except for a small charity he ran into the ground (spent too much money). If he's never lead, and his past experience shows that the only executive position resulted in bankrupting a charity, what do you think he's going to do for the country?

Posted by: Russell | September 2, 2008 11:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Unbelievable. In other words, a woman should stay home with her children? Suddenly, this is what the elite believe? The hypocrisy is breathtaking.

Posted by: Larry | September 2, 2008 11:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is an admitted former COCAINE user a better example for your children????????

Posted by: Eileen | September 2, 2008 10:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn,from one woman to another,let me just say this about your article concerning John McCains VP pick. Palin does have a first name, it's Sarah. As my mother would say,"woman like you were called jealous,rhimes with witches".Get used to Sarah Palin, you will be seeing alot of her in the next four to eight years.I hope this wasn't inappropriate. And by the way, John McCain didn't pick Sarah Palin simply because she is a woman, but because she is a superwoman. We can all learn from her, even you. Thank you, Janet

Posted by: Janet Rotharmel | September 2, 2008 10:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is also written, "Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word."

So does that mean Obama's first priority should be to his wife, thus making his decision to seek the presidency a selfish one? What happens if something happens to his wife or children?

Apply the standard equally please.

Posted by: Yvonne | September 2, 2008 10:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You know, all your comments said about Palin being picked because she's a woman can be said about Obama because he's half black. Last I checked 92% of black voters were voting for Obama. Don't even try to tell me that they believe this guy is the best man suited for the job. Obama has no executive experience, except for a small charity he ran into the ground (spent too much money). If he's never lead, and his past experience shows that the only executive position resulted in bankrupting a charity, what do you think he's going to do for the country?

Posted by: Russell | September 2, 2008 10:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Eileen - W used cocaine too; plus he was an alcoholic with a DUI...I am sure you voted for him.

Posted by: seville | September 2, 2008 10:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is totally wrong. Liberal women should learn to control their hysteria when confront by strong and capable women like Sarah Palin.

Posted by: The Professor | September 2, 2008 10:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You know, all your comments said about Palin being picked because she's a woman can be said about Obama because he's half black. Last I checked 92% of black voters were voting for Obama. Don't even try to tell me that they believe this guy is the best man suited for the job. Obama has no executive experience, except for a small charity he ran into the ground (spent too much money). If he's never lead, and his past experience shows that the only executive position resulted in bankrupting a charity, what do you think he's going to do for the country?

Posted by: Russell | September 2, 2008 10:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You know, all your comments said about Palin being picked because she's a woman can be said about Obama because he's half black. Last I checked 92% of black voters were voting for Obama. Don't even try to tell me that they believe this guy is the best man suited for the job. Obama has on executive experience, except for a small charity he ran into the ground (spent too much money). If he's never lead, and his past experience shows that the only executive position resulted in bankrupting a charity, what do you think he's going to do for the country?

Posted by: Russell | September 2, 2008 10:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gosh do we question Obama's dedication to his children or is it just a female thing???????
Also I am wondering why is a former drug addict ...cocaine user ....on the ballot. as we all know cocaine always has an allure for former users.

Posted by: Eileen | September 2, 2008 10:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gosh do we question Obama's dedication to hid children or is it just a female thing???????
Also I am wondering why is a former drug addict ...cocaine user ....on the ballot. as we all know cocaine always has an allure for former users.

Posted by: Eileen | September 2, 2008 10:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sara Palin is sending our daughters the wrong message. She is saying it's o.k. to get pregnant while in school. Just get married when you get out. Women that believe this need brain surgery.

Posted by: Starbright | September 2, 2008 10:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well, let's see. The same exact people that voted George Bush into office TWICE, are the same people that now can't wait till John McCain starts WWIII so he can prove he got what it takes to be 'commander-in-chief.' The same people who put Dick Cheney back in the White House TWICE, are the same people who now want to put a little town mayor turned governor (for about 2 mins) into the second highest office of the land. God forbid anyone question her credentials or abilities . God forbid any American questions her character, since we all know of course that it is perfectly alright now that she leaves a 4 y/o, a special needs baby of 5 months old, and a teeenage pregnant daughter back in Alaska so she can fulfill her dearest wish...to be on the cover of Vogue and People magazine! God Forbid we ask questions, because, after all, these people had such honest to goodness sharp decision making capabilities!

Posted by: anniemargret | September 2, 2008 10:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a mother of two young girls ages 4 and 6. In light of recent political events and I am forced to question: how would I explain Bristol Palin's pregnancy to my daughters if they were 14 and 16? It's one thing when Jamie Lynn Spears is the unwed teenage mother and quite another when it is the daughter of the candidate running for vice president of the United States.

Teenage pregnancies for young, unwed mothers seems to be becoming a mainstream, acceptable situation. I am so sorry for all of you mothers of teenage girls that will have to be having this discussion this week - while it is so important to discuss it, it must be so hard to explain why it's probably not going to work out so well for Bristol Palin - daughter of the GOP VP candidate.

Posted by: seville | September 2, 2008 10:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

everyone is hating on the Governor. Don't think that would be the case from this particular paper if she was a dem.

Posted by: Wow, | September 2, 2008 10:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am sure that this is the same thought process that kept women from breaking through the glass ceiling for years. "Should be home with the family.", "Can't do the work and raise kids at the same time.", "Can't do the work because of the kids.", "Her kids have done X, so it is obvious she is A)the cause of her kids problems or B) not qualified because her kids have problems.", or both.
As far as the choice made by McCain goes, it is obvious that it is a tactical and strategic selection more on what Sarah appears to be (much of politics is perception) to voters than on the loads of experience that she lacking.
I don't knock Obama on his lack of foreign policy experience. It is his foreign policy judgment, that the press has covered up as much as possible, that is the real problem. He has made a multitude of blunders that rival extreme ignorance such as his statements about nuclear weapons being "off the table". How about Iran is a tiny country and can't hurt us? How about willingly going along with denying our war effort the money needed to be successful? His background and upbringing form his judgment, which is horrendous.
It would be more conducive to intelligent questions and debate to cover actual decisions made by her in regards to her duties as governor. Trolling around her daughter and the life altering situation she is in now is despicable. Since liberals like to troll for anything, having no class, I would imagine their next target will McCain's disabled daughter, Bridget, in order . to be completely investigate our prez candidates

Posted by: infinitewisdom4u | September 2, 2008 10:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Can Sarah think without a script?"

Well, we know she can read a Teleprompter. Barely.

She has obviously failed to teach her daughter the difference between right and wrong. How can she be trusted to run the country, or even preside over the Senate?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 10:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin: 2 years of executive experience running the largest state in the country
Barack Obama: 143 days in the Senate

Sarah Palin: "Armed forces, including my son, give us security and freedom." (Jan 2008)
Barack Obama: "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction" (from his autobiography, Audacity of Hope)

Sarah Palin: Reduced general fund spending by $124 million. (Mar 2007)
Barack Obama: Voted NO on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)

Sarah Palin: Claimed $500 million subsidy for gas pipeline. (Aug 2008)
Barack Obama: Voted YES on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies. (Jun 2007)

Sarah Palin: Cut state funding to Alaska’s construction projects, reformed corrupt government positions, and now has an approval rating of over 70%.
Barack Obama: Cast 130 "present" votes in the IL Senate

And Palin is only up for Vice President. I find it absurd that all these Obama journalists swear she will be unable to handle the position when she's been far more effective getting things done than Obama has--5 kids and all.

Posted by: Amanda | September 2, 2008 10:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with this article entirely. As a working mother of a three year old I understand just how difficult this balance is. I started working when she was 5 days old as Sarah Palin did, but have chosen to never work more than twenty hours a week so I could spend time with my child. This has been an incredibly difficult balance - but one I cherish.

Add in to the mix the fact that the new child is a special needs child and that the job is being leader of the free world and you have an impossible challenge. Either you short change the needs of the child or you short change the needs of your country. Neither is acceptable.

Hands on education is vital in the first four years of a child with down syndrome. They have an enormous effect on the rest of the child's life. Who has taken on this challenge? The husband? I haven't heard him described as a stay-at-home Dad, I have heard him described as a part-time fisherman.

Apparently her family values are to have as many children as possible and then ignore them.

These are not my family values.

Posted by: Bea | September 2, 2008 10:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Truly amazing how quickly the RNC can get people (their sheepies) to flood websites like this with comments attacking anyone who dares to criticize their Chosen One. Good job trying to fake the comments to look like your typical semi-literate, trailer-trash Republican.

Anyone who believes that Palin has foreign policy experience simply because her state is the nearest to Russia doesn't deserve the right to vote. Maybe we should elect the governor of North Dakota, since his state also adjoins a foreign country. Or the governors of California, Washington, New York, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Idaho, Wisconsin, Michigan, etc.

Yes, one side in this race is truly desperate--but it isn't the Democratic side.

Posted by: Amazed | September 2, 2008 10:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Anger, rightly said.
It is sickening to see how this 'top political learders do not hesitate a bit to put the country's interest at stake for power and to get to the whitehouse. It is a shame. I cann't believe this is happening in the educated American society. Do we care whether woman has to rule, no, this is not a office assistant job. Whether man or woman who is capable should lead, who is capable of turning the economy for better, handle international and security issues should be the one.

Posted by: oberver | September 2, 2008 10:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama is a 'two bit hustler from Chicago?' Lordy...you 'Christians' are truly amazing, and so 'Christ-like' aren't you?

Barack Obama is a full professor of law with a degree from HARVARD. He was the President of the Harvard Law Review! He could run rings around St. Sarah in two minutes flat, with a brain that runs at the speed of light. He actually thinks! Unlike McCain and Bush, he can think without a script in front of him! Can Sarah think without a script? Can McCain?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 10:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"isn't ready to lead the free world" such a rush to judgement. The opinions that matter most are the ones who have been executives of a town, started a small businesses, or the ones who took on her own party's corrupt establishment. Not to mention having the approval rating over 80%. What else? She probably thought network TV was to easy.

Posted by: TheB52s | September 2, 2008 10:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn is an example of a reporter who writes more and more about less and less. All she can do is rip a qualified leader like Gov. Palin to exalt her opinion. This is a tired form of criticism that will fold as fast as the newspaper industry. It is interesting that Ms. Quinn made no comments about Gov. Palin's accomplishments in the offices she's held. She would rather suppress this information and magnify Palin's family affairs.

Posted by: Upstate New Yorker | September 2, 2008 10:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As someone who does not enjoy hype and spin, I am quite dizzy over the past two days. Yes, family and personal faith should be off limits, but , then, a party has made such a thing its bread and butter. I read a recent pro-Palin essay attributed to Pat Buchanan, which I thought at first was a lampoon, because the comedy blogs are already making such defensive statements as jokes: namely that we are safe from Canada and Russia during Palin's watch.

Foreign experience, abstinence, no sex ed, family values, and what else? This is like the Mad Hatter's (Republican) tea party. What is real?

Posted by: Bryan Gilliam | September 2, 2008 10:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This just in....Sarah will have to be 'tutored' by Bush advisors. Tutored. The woman couldn't find Iraq on a map if they pointed it out to her. She will be reading on script. When are the American people going to see this 'electrifying' person of high intelligence and experience? When will see a one on one with the press? Fire away! Don't pull any punches, Press. She wants to play with the 'big boys club' and we will let her, provided she gets the same treatment that any other candidate will get. Let her speak without a script on war/peace, immigration, taxes, economy, India, China, Pakistan, Ahmadinejad, the Ayatollah, etc...Let's hear her opinion on the Sunni and Shi'a and the conflict with Israel and Iran. Then we'll see if she is V.P. material or just another Alaska 'babe' pretty face with a penchant for killing caribou with an AK47.

Posted by: anniemargret | September 2, 2008 10:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I remember when Sally Quinn was gushing when George W. Bush was inaugurated in 2001. Quinn was on television telling the audience how honorable and decent the Bush's were. Now she writes that Palin is absolutely unqualified to be vice-president. I'll tell you something she didn't know that a lot of Americans knew in 2000, George W. Bush had absolutely no business even being considered for president, let alone to be appointed president by that useless Supreme Court decision. She finally sees the light...8 years to late for the rest of us.

Posted by: Rick Vanderstappen | September 2, 2008 10:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You posted the following in order to turn off women voters:

"A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation."


It probally will, but if all was right in the world it would be the number one reasen she was voted for.

I read in the blogs that being a beliver is a negative.

What is our country comming to?

I hope and pray Obama is not the next president

Posted by: Larry McEntire | September 2, 2008 10:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win an election."

Oh, but Obama didn't make his VP choice based on calculations to win an election?

Wow, the double standards and "doublethink" of liberals is simply amazing...

Posted by: asdasfasdgsdf | September 2, 2008 10:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I love the fact that you and the whole lefty/liberal blogosphere are up in arms over Palin. If Obama gets elected, it will truly be "for all the wrong reasons"; the man is an articulate but empty suit, adored by mindless pundits like you and the hollywood elite.

The sad part is that you would attack a viable woman candidate over your own shallow, narrow-minded political pandering.

Posted by: Brady | September 2, 2008 10:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Right on, Sally. I was amazed at how many scathing responses you have had to your piece. Wow, the Republican Right Wing must have had instructions to flood all these areas.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 10:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win an election."

Oh, but Obama didn't make his VP choice based on calculations to win an election?

Wow, the double standards and "doublethink" of liberals is simply amazing...

Posted by: asdasfasdgsdf | September 2, 2008 10:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win an election."

Oh, but Obama didn't make his VP choice based on calculations to win an election?

Wow, the double standards and "doublethink" of liberals is simply amazing...

Posted by: Hypocrisy | September 2, 2008 10:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As someone who does not enjoy hype and spin, I am quite dizzy over the past two days. Yes, family and personal faith should be off limits, but , then, a party has made such a thing its bread and butter. I read a recent pro-Palin essay attributed to Pat Buchanan, which I thought at first was a lampoon, because the comedy blogs are already making such defensive statements as jokes: namely that we are safe from Canada and Russia during Palin's watch.

Foreign experience, abstinence, no sex ed, family values, and what else? This is like the Mad Hatter's (Republican) tea party. What is real?

Posted by: Bryan Gilliam | September 2, 2008 10:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

OMG, Palin isn't ready, but a two-bit chicago hustler is? I love you women's libbers demonizing the epitome of a do-it-all female. You BO idolizers will say or do anything, won't you. We all understand that you hate Bush, but is selling out your decency, integrety, beliefs and your soul really worth getting a Marxist into the presidency?

Posted by: mmouse | September 2, 2008 10:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, why don't you go eat a ham sandwich and salute your Joseph Stalin poster and stop spewing your biased liberal garbage all over the internet. It's because of you that your poor excuse of a newspaper is going under and others like it all over the country. Good riddance.

Posted by: SandwichLuvr | September 2, 2008 10:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Family first. Especially in Sarah Palin's case.

Posted by: C. Neiman | September 2, 2008 10:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

No wonder newspapers are going broke!

Posted by: Jim | September 2, 2008 10:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sex bashing to the worst degree. Please put this piece back in the 1940s where it belongs.

All other women need to make the vote to change this discrimination against women, mothers, and working mothers - vote for Sarah Palin in 08!

Posted by: Why Is This Still Up? | September 2, 2008 10:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The extremely meager details of Obama's healthcare, economic or foreign affairs plans that he's articulated don't make a bit of sense, which I think is a much larger issue than Sarah Palin's family life. Obama claims to have more experience than her, but she absolutely trounces him in the area of tangible accomplishments. His is a campaign of empty promises and the msidirection of blame. Fortunately for him, most liberals don't let facts and common sense influence their decision. There is currently a GLOBAL economic turndown. The UK economy is in its worst position in 60 years, and the dollar has been steadily gaining on the Euro in recent weeks. The difference is that the Brits don't have the audacity to suggest it's the governments fault.
Arrogance and ignorance are a deadly combination, and those are two areas where Obama bests McCain and Palin hands down.

Posted by: MarkD | September 2, 2008 10:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn has eloquently and thoughtfully stated the case regarding Governor Palin's assumption of the Vice Presidential mantle.
It would be contrary to all the wisdom which the Right has repeatedly voiced regarding major issues surrounding the role of woman taken from the biblical model they have interpreteed and endorsed repeatedly.
This action of John McCain's is a slap at all women who take seriously the role of office and the role of motherhood. He is attempting to manipulate his election by using a woman upon whose shoulders he would lean and stand as he assumes the stressful and challenging role of the Presidency. This is insanity. Someone offering this script for a film would have a hard time shopping it to the producers.
The presidential campaign coming from the right is now a sideshow gone mad.
McCain has violated his own principles and those of his party by his behavior.
Sarah Palin appears to be a nice person but she is not the appropriate candidate for the job.Why did he not choose Kay Bailey Hutchnison or one of the other outstanding women with a track record in the party? Because he wishes everyong to continue to percieve him to be a maverick. Well John it is time to hang those spurs up and think of the welfare of the country your so ardently embrace. and proclaim.

Posted by: Rev. Christine D. Barton | September 2, 2008 10:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

great example!
Your job as an anchorwoman vs Palin (already a proven Govenor)becoming VP. Sounds a little like you are just angry at the beauty of the choice and the fact that you were terrible on tv.

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 10:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are focusing on the negative only; I hope other Christian women will see her as a leader who will be a role model.

Posted by: Diane | September 2, 2008 10:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

THERE IS NO PROBLEM. Many kids do as they will; they make mistakes (Lord knows YOU didn't make any as a teen, correct?:). The family is living up to its pro-life stand; how HONORABLE that they don't want to kill a growing child for convenience. What a smear piece you've written, but it's from the Washington Post, perhaps only second in shame to the NY Times. And how ashamed you should be AS A WOMAN. But why am I surprised? Since Day 1 the media has been campaigning and covering for Obama. Now they are worried their choice for president (which they want to be OUR choice because we're apparently too stupid to form our own conclusions), may lose due to the CREDIBILITY, CHARACTER and HARD WORK of the HONEST Sarah Palin. I wasn't voting for McCain until Palin joined the ticket. She has PROVEN herself the best man/woman or whatever for the job. Anyone notice how much gender doesn't matter when it's a conservative running? How dishonest of the left and how typical of the quickly sliding media; the U.S. media needs to read the Journalist's Creed and come out of the pit! This former journalism major is disgusted with what I see; a biased press is no better or worse than a govt-controlled press! WHich is why I stopped reading the Post regularly LONG ago. And PLEASE stop insulting GOD by putting your POLITICAL piece in a section entitled "On Faith." Do you even believe, attend worhship in community as Jesus did, know what WWJD stands for??? Your article makes me wonder...

Posted by: FLNonny | September 2, 2008 10:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with EVERYTHING you have written. First hand I know what it takes to raise a child with down's syndrome and I cannot fathom how she intends to juggle the care and emotional well being of a special needs child, a young pregnant daughter plus 3 other children while sitting in the VP slot. It is terrifying to think that this woman might replace McCain as President. She is completely unprepared to sit in either office. Her ambition is so great that she is willing to jeopardize the stability of her family and our great nation.

Posted by: nikki Hodges | September 2, 2008 10:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I totally agree with the above article on Palin. She seems to be an intelligent woman but is not up to perform the job as a VP for the President of the USA. She does not show herself as a great mother. Giving birth to 5 children does not mean she is a good mother.

Posted by: chan | September 2, 2008 10:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm saddened and astonished by the assertion that a woman and mother is being irresponsible by choosing to aspire to high office. And, with the participation of her husband in the management of home and family.

What about her opponent? Mr. Obama aspires to the highest office in land with two young daughters - who many will advise - require the vital presence and support of a father at this delicate point in their development. Are we to disregard him as a worthy candidate because his place is with his family? And, what if HE gets that phonecall at 3am??????

What an absurd debate. It sets the progress women have made back by 50 years...shame on you.

Posted by: Carol | September 2, 2008 10:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well, now. Should John McCain and Sarah Palin gain the white house, this will be one for the history books. VP with a pregnant and unmarried daughter inhabiting our greatest institution. Republican Family Values at its best. That, along with the Republican talking points that have been handed out and read like a high crib sheet written in the palm of the hand and shared to the sheep. Hypocrisy is at work and America is the laughing stock of Europe.

Posted by: Walt | September 2, 2008 10:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

get real

Posted by: john | September 2, 2008 10:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Washington Post blather. Once again we see the other reason our founding fathers included free speech as one of our most cherished rights. Not only can we speak of our opposition without fear of retribution, but when they speak we can know them by their limping.

Posted by: pat | September 2, 2008 10:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

1. Proofread your work.
2. Don't assume that because you were a failure, she will be.
3. If Palin can't do the job having children, then you must condemn Obama as well.
4. The race for the presidency is between McCain and Obama, not Palin and Obama - don't cloud the issue. Any VP who has to step into the position will get more than enough help.
5. Please provide some evidence that this is gender politics in action - if it were about gender politics, McCain could have just as easily picked Condi Rice or Kay Bailey Hutchison. No, I think there is more to this story than you are acknowledging.

Posted by: Tony | September 2, 2008 10:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You write for the Washington Post?

Posted by: Clark Ian | September 2, 2008 10:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a stupid article. You nitwit liberals are promoting an empty suit affirmative action candidate simply because he is black. He has no accomplishments, has no record of change, in fact no record at all. His spiritual advisors are hate America liberals, and he has indicated that he will back muslims when the chips are down.
Palin has more experience governing(you do understand the word, don't you?) than both the losers the democrats nominated. And she isn't Hillary. Thank god she isn't Hillary. She is tough, honest, classy and has ethics, integrity and morals. She has a husband who loves her and doesn't chase every skirt that goes by.
You liberal nitwits are backing a couple of arrogant eggheads who couldn't secure their back yards, much less this great nation.
Keep writing your liberal BS. It won't make a difference in the long run.

Posted by: LarryG62 | September 2, 2008 10:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

anyone investigating statutory rape charges for the father? was he an adult at the time? do they still have sex?

Posted by: indigoblue | September 2, 2008 10:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your dumb

Posted by: Sam | September 2, 2008 10:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why can't the dad help raise the daughter and grand daughter??? I see no problem "reversing" roles, do you?

Posted by: Steve | September 2, 2008 10:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why are mothers held to a different standard than fathers? If Palin were a man would we be asking ourselves any of these questions about her family and where her priorities are? Of course we wouldn't. Why are women expected to put their children first and careers second? Why aren't men expected to do the same? Why did you have to point out that Nancy Pelosi waited until her children were older to have her political career? This is incredibly sexist and unfair.

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 2, 2008 10:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama/Biden both empty heads , empty suits. Is it any wonder newspapers are on the verge of extinction. They are polluted with members of the countrys largest hate group, the democRAT party, a party Saddam Hussien, Osama Bin Laden, Adolph Hitler, Bill Ayers, would feel right at home in. And yes this is the party stinky old hag Sally Quinn belongs to. People are fed up with the loon left like yourself.

Posted by: Jill | September 2, 2008 10:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Each woman has the right to make choices for her own family and to not be judged for them. If Sarah Palin can spit out a baby and return to work the next day, good for her. Her husband is the primary caregiver. Why should Quinn or any other woman make a judgement that she can't be VP and a hands on and good mother because she has five children. She has chosen what works for her and her family and should not be attacked for it. To suggest she go home is insulting. I am offended that other professional women dare to attack her when they themselves have made personal choices that may not be traditional. These kinds of ridiculous attacks only make Palin more attractive to working mothers like myself.

Posted by: Jeanie | September 2, 2008 10:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Disgusted NJ Independent.

You are fooling no one, dear. Not even close.

Your name should read "panic stricken Obama acolyte." You and the other two or three "independents" posting their sham indignation because McCain DARED to pick a woman.

As a hopeless liberal, you are too, too transparent.

Anyone who "worries" about Palin, a strong-minded intelligent woman of conviction with executive experience, being "a heartbeat away" -- while Obama, a street-activist radical with extremely limited experience and a voting record and a past he doesn't want to talk about sits AT THE TOP OF THE TICKET -- anyone who tries that line is obviously one of the Kool-Aid drinkers.

Keep bringing up experience, so we can keep reminding everyone that Obama, sitting AT THE TOP OF THE TICKET, has none.

"NJ Independent." Get real.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 9:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Get over it. I think it was a fine pick. Yes, the fact that she is a woman no doubt played a role, but she is also a reformer in exactly the same mold McCain wants to be.

Posted by: Mark A. | September 2, 2008 9:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
It is quite obvious to us out here in the real world (outside the beltway) that your piece is written from a person who is afraid that John McCain might be the next president, or who is completely out of touch with the rest of us. Sarah Palin has more experience than Obama in that she has run a business, been an executive officer as mayor and later Governor of the most geography of any U S Governor. What does Obama's experience consist of? Oh yes, community organizer dealing with who gets food stamps and free rent, and later a short time as a legislator where he got nothing done, and then three and one-half years as a U S senator of which two and one-half years was spent running for president. You must be forgetting that Mrs. Palin is not running for President. She is running for Vice President. Obama, the rock star, is vying to be commander in chief of the most powerful fighting force in the history of the world, yet he doesn't even know which end of the tube the round comes out of. Could it be that you are afraid your guy is going to lose? I have to admit it's a lot of fun watching you main stream press people squirm.

Posted by: Darrell Williams | September 2, 2008 9:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"After four years of reporting at the Washington Post, I was chosen by CBS to be the first network anchorwoman in America, to co-anchor their Morning News. I had never been on TV a day in my life. I was 32. There were women at CBS who were much more qualified than I was and certainly other men. They chose me because they wanted a woman. I didn't even want the job, but I didn't feel I could turn it down. Of course it was a disaster. I lasted four months. I wasn't ready for Network TV."

Sally, you are pathetic and self-loathing. The above paragraph shows how incredibly JEALOUS you are of Palin.

Sarah Palin has gotten this far through intelligence, common sense and hard work. The only reason you're still writing for the WaPo is because you married the BIG boss.

Admit it. The only stunningly regrettable thing about Palin as far as the Dems are concerned is that she is not a Dem.

BTW - For the posters mentioning Mr. Palin's DUI from about 22 years ago - Let's see... that puts it at about the same time Obama was admittedly snorting cocaine.

BTW2 - Obama's mother got pregnant with him when she was 17 and married his father (the bigamist) three months later.

Posted by: waterfrontproperty | September 2, 2008 9:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article is completely off the mark. Yes I'm sure her being a woman has something to do with his decision, and it was a shrewd political one. But how many of those have Obama done? Didn't Obama pick the candidate that would help him win? Why can't McCain do the same? Your arguments do no follow logic. This is a sad all to bias report that can't be taken seriously.

Posted by: Sam | September 2, 2008 9:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you for telling it like it is, Sally. I agree with you 100%. McCain has made a reckless choice, one that thoughtful people will have a hard time respecting.

By the way, why is no one asking who is taking care of the new baby? Even if he didn't have Down's Syndrome, WHO IS TAKING CARE OF HIM??? His pregnant teen-age sister? Why is the media not asking this important question? Oh, yes, I remember, once feminist thinking took hold in our country, little children became invisible. Nothing is more important than a woman's career. Sarah Palin is to be praised for going back to work two days after he was born!
Who needs a mothe anyway?

Posted by: Deborah | September 2, 2008 9:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Here are some Alaska FACTS:

Alaska is the largest state in union by far, everybody knows that, but did you know that Alaska has a greater population (683,478) than current Democratic party chairman and one time Democatic Presidential candidate and former Governor, HOWARD DEAN's state of VERMONT and nearly as great as the population of current Democratic Vice Presidential candidate Sen JOE BIDEN's state of DELAWARE.

In fact Alaska has a greater population than that of many other places including the Cities of:
Washington DC,
Orlando FL,
Boston MA,
New Orleans LA,
Cleveland OH,
Seattle WA,
and Baltimore MD,

And a greater population than the States of:
North Dakota
and Wyoming,

And a greater population than the Nations of:
Montenegro,
Iceland,
Luxembourg,
The Bahamas,
The Isle of Man,
Gibraltar,
Greenland,
Andorra,
Malta,
Aruba,
and Monaco.

Posted by: Britcom | September 2, 2008 9:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why in the world would anyone think that "Hilary Clinton voters" would EVER vote for Sarah Palin? There is NO comparison. Sarah Palin is the antithesis of Hilary Clinton. It is an insult to women, Democrats, and all voters with any gray matter (at all) to consider Sarah Palin as any kind of alternative to Hilary Clinton. The political platform and agenda is the issue, not HER GENDER!!!!

Posted by: Jennifer Cook | September 2, 2008 9:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn has gotten most of her jobs because of her gender and because she is an ineffective, neutered spokesperson [says who?] of religion.

Posted by: Quinnsfather | September 2, 2008 9:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I and a republican, but I don't like McCain because he is a RINO. I was going to vote for Obama until he picked Biden for his running mate. Then, I wasn't going to vote. Now, I am going to vote for McCain because of Pulin.

Posted by: Marie | September 2, 2008 9:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Great article Sally, I thought it was fair and balanced.

Posted by: Winston | September 2, 2008 9:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If as Republicans claim, we are voting for the top of the ticket and not also the VP, why should we be excited about Sarah Palin's selection? If on the other hand, the person one heartbeat away from the presidency, God help us!

Mrs Palin is clearly unsuited to the commander-in-chief should the need arise. Her candidacy poses risks to three communities: republicans, women and christians. An incompetent Palin administration can only raise the hurdles for the next candidate from any of these groups, just as JWB's spectacular job is making it harder for his fellow republicans and born-again christians.

Republicans and christians should remember that God is not a Republican. Also, we live in a plurality. Their views on abortion apply to their own conduct and the conduct of those they influence. Trying to compel others to live by their precepts or choosing a woman soley because she's a woman, totes guns, eats moose and wants to impose her views on the rest of us is nothing short of insulting. Just try to lead by example for a change.

The republicans are trying to dress up spam and call it filet mignon. Americans are not that stupid.

Posted by: Disgusted NJ Independent | September 2, 2008 9:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What an obvious attempt to attack the choice instead of the issues. You automatically assume that just because she is a woman, that is the only reason JM chose her. How sexist indeed. Why can't you be honest and just say you dont agree with her political views. You suggest she shouldn't run because she has 5 children. I guess any mother with 5 children should be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen as opposed to serving the public good. You suggest the out of wedlock pregnancy of her teen daughter somehow makes her a 'bad mother' or one that lacks 'hands on' parenting. What hogwash. The fact that she and her husband have a special needs child and a pregnant teen daughter only makes them more human. It is after all, the Utopia that liberals have been pushing for decades where teen sex is okay, isnt it? Your article is BS, pure and simple and I believe you should take a good long hard look at your true motives. How would you like to lose your job because of your family obligations? HOw would you react to being denied opportunity in any position because of your gender. I am ashamed for you, and you should be ashamed of yourself.

Posted by: Shame On YOU | September 2, 2008 9:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So... you're saying that McCain can't criticize Obama's youth because he picked Palin for VP but you felt comfortable criticizing her for this apparent "youth". You also asked an incorrect rhetorical question... "Is Palin ready to be president?" Last I checked, she wasn't running for president. Lastly you mention that Barbara Bush said there's nothing you can do that prepares you for the White House but then say Palin's not prepared. What exactly would you say could prepare you for the White House? Didn't Barbara's comment clarify this for you? Do you even have an editor rapidly scan this nonsense before you publish it? I think the local community college is offering intro courses to logic this Fall. You may want to look into it.

Posted by: Confused | September 2, 2008 9:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Amazing. I gave up on Maureen Dowd long ago, but still gave Ms. Quinn credit for having a lot of class. Boy was I wrong.

PS I actually enjoyed her on TV back in the 70's.

Posted by: marty Chapman | September 2, 2008 9:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow Sally! Just the kind of snobby elitism I'd expect from a Washington Post alleged journalist. Were was your call trying abolish gender politics when Sen. Clinton was running? Could it be your comments are no more than eight grade girl jealousy because she's been able to accomplish things that you haven't been able to do? Have fun drinking that liberal media bias kool-aid.

Posted by: Adam Cummins | September 2, 2008 9:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess your inbox is full, so this is the default?
No matter, I'll just call you out in public!

Your objection to Sarah is not based on any idea you have that she may not be qualified, you gave that away early! You are scared to death that a woman who doesn't conform to your political ideology will be successful, thereby demonstrating that your complaints of "sexism" always have been and always will be empty, and your ideology is baseless.

You're done!

Thank you for your time,
Leo Wiser

Posted by: l wise | September 2, 2008 9:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just because you Sally Quinn didnt have a son entering millitary service in a dangerous zone, a 4 month old downs syndrome child, a child expecting, having served in elected positions for years and governor of one of the largest states of the union bordered also by a foreign nation means nothing. You probably didnt grow up in a rural self sustaining area where self preservation and existance in the elements is everyday knowledge. You Sally may not have been ready to take on an anchor position but what does this have to do with Palins qualifications and accomplishments?

Posted by: brian | September 2, 2008 9:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So McCain is a cynic? I think the chief cynics in this election is the mulatto candidate who is nothing but a scumbag Chicago machine politician and his socialist/Marxist media buddies.

Posted by: Bob Moore | September 2, 2008 9:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So McCain is a cynic? I think the chief cynics in this election is the mulatto candidate who is nothing but a scumbag Chicago machine politician and his socialist/Marxist media buddies.

Posted by: Bob Moore | September 2, 2008 9:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If family issues disqualify a candidate, then no one is qualified to run for office. Were you as concerned with John Edwards running for president at the same time his wife was suffering from cancer? I was led to believe liberals supported working women. Guess that is not true.

Posted by: Ryan Kaufman | September 2, 2008 9:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You can't be serious or expect people to take you seriously if you call yourself prolife and yet support the death penalty and war.

Sorry, you can't cherry pick scripture. Jesus was specifically against violence, including the death penalty ("He who has not sinned must cast the first stone").

Catholics like Palin say they are following the church on the subject of birth control and abortion, but have they ever noticed that the church is officially against war and the death penalty?

True prolife individuals respect all life, even that of the cruelest sinner. Only God should take life.

Posted by: Mike of Atlanta | September 2, 2008 9:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Pandering? Uh, does anyone (to the political right of Stalin) actually believe an empty suit like Obama didn't get nominated because he's black? Or runner-up Jr senator Hillary because she's a woman and an ex-president's wife?

Posted by: Mike Schmidt | September 2, 2008 9:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

why am i not surprised a washington post (so extremely liberal that it's commonly joked about) journalist and DC Insider (translation - she kisses up to the liberal democrats and puts their talking points in WaPo articles) come across as an unstable partisan hack?
sally, it appears as if your competency as an unbiased political journalist is as much of a disappointment as your stint as a network anchorwoman. kudos! keep on keepin' on!!

Posted by: mike hunt | September 2, 2008 9:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Pandering? Uh, does anyone (to the political right of Stalin) actually believe an empty suit like Obama didn't get nominated because he's black? Or runner-up Jr senator Hillary because she's a woman and an ex-president's wife?

Posted by: Mike Schmidt | September 2, 2008 9:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Excellent reasoning. But McCain didn't pick her to appeal to folks who consider issues like "is she qualified to manage world affairs". He picked her to appeal to the emotion of the blue collar crowd; NRA membership, teen pregnancy, beauty contests. These folks look at the Palin family and see their own, made good.

Posted by: Theresa | September 2, 2008 9:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

More liberal snobbishness and garbage. Its amazing these people have jobs.

Posted by: CTB | September 2, 2008 9:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your so right Sally! That Palin woman ought to be home raising her babies. A woman cannot work a job that important and be a good mother at the same time.

Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: DeJohn | September 2, 2008 9:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Liberals are running scared. It's truely entertaining to watch.

Posted by: patrick | September 2, 2008 9:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally if you remember BHO Mother was not married to his Father, or does that matter to big libs?

You really can't stand it that she is such a beautiful sucessful lady that you will never be.

What does her daughter have to do with her running
for vp. Her family is off limits to you losers.

She is really some smart lady. Council, Mayor and Gov. You can't get any better than that.

I say go MCCAIN/PALIN 08

Posted by: Minnie | September 2, 2008 9:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Those who are left stranded by a changing tide never want to believe that a sea change is happening. HMS Boomer has reached its final port. Political analysis by anyone over 50 is passé and excruciatingly solipsistic. Sally, you may still be collecting a paycheck but your crowded hour is over. Retire and play with the grandkids, for once.

Posted by: all ashore | September 2, 2008 9:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
I'm not qualified to judge your interesting views about Palin's candidacy.
However,isn't the most importent point that McCain choosing her shows him to be as dumb and reckless as a Bush?
Why didn't he choose Condi Rice? Wouldn't that have cinched support, and the election?

Posted by: Jack | September 2, 2008 9:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This piece is as elitist as it is hateful. Why do liberals only claim to be open minded when it suits their agenda?

Posted by: Sean Keefe | September 2, 2008 9:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't understand why everyone is asking if Palin is ready to be president. I get that John McCain is old. I get that he keeps getting cancer. I get that you need to attack Palin in every way possible. But seriously. McCain has done a bang up job with surviving cancer, torture and the rigors of running for president. I think he can make it 4 years. If we need to get into push and shove, what makes Biden capable of being president? 25 years of politics? The question has to be asked. POTUS vs. POTUS; VPOTUS vs. VPOTUS. That's how the campaign should be run. It's not Obama/Biden vs. Palin. It's Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin. Let's keep our heads about us people.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 9:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are sick and twisted and jealous!

Posted by: Mary Teets | September 2, 2008 9:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The greatest asset of Sarah Palin is herself. She has written herself in her life and work. She is not shaped and molded by expectations and sterotypes. Her varied and unusual background in growing up free in Alaska has given her uniqueness and character.
This is most exciting.
I'm sure you, Sally are a good mother. But a good mother can also have children who get on without her because she is a good mother. Sarah Palins children also have a father.
Sara seem full of promise and gives me hope. She fulfills my dream that new ideas and new resisitance to the statis quo is possible.

Posted by: kathy boland | September 2, 2008 9:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn is afraid of a woman like Palin. She, like all the lefists cannot understand and do not want to understand Palin. Here is a strong and forceful woman who is married, has children, hunts and fishes, NRA member, God forbid, a conservative, etc. But even more important than the above, she does not worship at the feet of Obama, she does not worship the Left's sacrament in their religion, which is abortion.

We are well aware that Ms. Quinn is in the tank for Obama and is a tool of his campaign. It is a shame.

Posted by: walter | September 2, 2008 9:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I like how "qualified" woman is used as a euphemism for "liberal" woman. Just because a person doesn't share your liberal and permissive views doesn't mean that she's unqualified.

It's just more of the same automatic assumption that a liberal point of view is somehow "objectively correct". How ridiculous.

For example, it's obvious Condoleeza Rice "doesn't count" to you as a milestone of US history as the first African-American Secretary of State. Must be because "she's just not right" or "not on your side", or that she's so closely tied to your blurry hate for the existing President that you can't admit that truthful fact.

Liberal hypocrisy knows no limits.

Posted by: Lava | September 2, 2008 9:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a hypocritical column, or should we say hit piece. Any thinking woman would be offended or outraged at the multiple feminine put downs you drop. Do you have any kids? If so, please stay home and quit writing these nonsensical columns.

Posted by: Sam | September 2, 2008 9:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is as ready as Obama. If Sarah Palin isn't ready to be VP, then certainly Obama is not ready to be President. What foreign policy experience does Obama have that is so superior to Palin's?

In a weird way, talking about how Palin's experience compares to Obama's highlights Obama's inexperience. At least the GOP has their ticket right-side-up. Notice how the Democrats are comparing the person at the top of the GOP ticket to person on the bottom of the Democratic ticket? It's like a team at the Olympics saying: "Ha, ha, our #1 beats your #2!"

Posted by: Tevye | September 2, 2008 9:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hmm. I thought Palin was running for Vice-President.

Wait, there's more genius in here:

"And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?"

McCain can do that in his campaign for the "pesidency" just as well as you don't bother to spell check.

The "heartbeat" away garbage argument didn't work against Reagan years ago (President to age 77). it also didn't work more recently against George W. vis-a-vis the universally hated Cheney.

Unless you can predict the future, you can't say that McCain won't outlive you, either. He could die tomorrow (you'd like that, I bet).

Until that time, let's compare qualifications and positions Pres-to-Pres and Veep-to-Veep, and stop taking lame shots. If you're going to shoot with words, learn not to be sloppy and make your shots count.

Posted by: Benny | September 2, 2008 9:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Everyone is a critic. I think Obamas bkgd of drug and alcohol use in conjuntion w/his great voting record make him a prime candidate.For dog catcher or meter maid. Get off Palin she has accomplished more than you ever will in public service and is a real person unlike The Plastic Obama Band!!!!!

Posted by: jmichjaels | September 2, 2008 9:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Very objective and well said!

Posted by: uno4all | September 2, 2008 9:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow. What a hateful article. Newsweek has no shame.

Posted by: Bob Frack | September 2, 2008 9:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I do believe that anyone who can support Palin is not really looking at her objectively and in comparison to the real qualifed women who could have probably met the needs of the party and the country.

As for the polls, I don't know what that dude is smoking but Obama is up by 8 in the daily tracking polls (Rasmussen and Galllup).

Posted by: Delilah | September 2, 2008 9:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

As a person of faith, do you oppose Ephesians 5 which calls for women to submit to(read respect and honor) their husband's leadership and likewise calls husbands to love their wives sacrificially as Christ loved the church... to care for their wives with the same attention to detail that they understand and care for their own bodies? After re-reading your quotation from the Baptist faith and message... what is so wrong about husband and wife putting each other first in marriage (I noticed that you failed to comment on what the husbands are called to do)?

Granted the language might seem outdated in the 21st century but I think when it comes to men and women we have had enough of the "me first" generation and its mindset.

As for Palin, she has more political experience than Barrack (not as much as Hillary but Hillary has been 'taken out' of the race and so we are left with a man who has less track record than McCain and Palin).

I am afraid your bias is showing through. It's disappointing. It seems that you speak of her from a liberal perspective and not that of a moderate. What is a moderate anyway? Just say you are a progressive or a liberal, theologically or politically speaking.

In any event, I agree that Palin is qualified to be VP but I am not so certain that the man nominated by the Democrats is qualified to be President or Vice President.

Keith Crosby

Posted by: Keith Crosby | September 2, 2008 8:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Some of what you say is true. Unfortunately it is interspersed with innuendo, bias and just plain garbage. As it does with most of the media, your real agenda stands out like a sore thumb. Keep up such stuff and your tenure will be short here also. (hopefully) If if I were your parent I would restrict your privileges and take away your Internet for 90 days.

Posted by: Dave West | September 2, 2008 8:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hmmm...faith and values columnist who is this out of touch with the worldview of people who embrace both faith and values.

Christians and various other religious groups will, I predict, be heartened by the fact that John McCain has nominated this woman who not only talks the talk, but also seems to be living it.

"These are dangerous and trying times for the entire world. This is no time to to play gender politics. The stakes are too high"

You might want to take your own advice, because you have entered into gender politics with glee...would you ever ask the same questions of a male candidate?

John McCain, in a highly competitive race has made the call to Sarah Palin, not as a token (as Walter Mondale utilized Geraldine Ferraro in a campaign that had not chance) but as an intriguing outsider pick.

I not only hope that John McCain's choice is a success from the standpoint of the election, but I also hope that Sarah Palin forces you to eat your words.

Posted by: Rocky | September 2, 2008 8:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

She is ready to be Vice President. The real question is Obama ready to be President.

Posted by: Indyracefan | September 2, 2008 8:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

sally instead of hashing the fish wrappers you need to get back over to the watergate. everytime you leave ben alone he wanders around the lobby in his bathrobe and dribbles down his chin.

it is your job to keep him out of the public eye. he might reveal that deep throat was linda lovlace and that bob woodward was the CIA contact at the WAPO.

be careful , elder sitter!

Posted by: walter kohn | September 2, 2008 8:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally: These poor deluded people on the right. Somehow they have become so insane about one thing, Abortion, they can't seem to understand that there are many other things that they should be worrying about like who in the hell is Sarah Palin? One of her defenders felt that she would be a great negotiator with Russia because Alaska is close to Russia. This is the level of intelligence of the average Palin supporter. Ach!!! Help us all.

And please read the post by the Jewish guy. It's hysterical. I think I might apply. I'm qualified. Kids are grown. I've traveled extensively and have been to every state in the U.S. I have a disabled daughter. But I'm not nearly as witty as Jewish guy. He wins:)

Posted by: Delilah | September 2, 2008 8:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

im sorry to say but i think u r very wrong sen mcain did not just choose sarah palin for his running mate just because she is a woman he choose her because she is a very bright and intelligent woman with expirience and will only help change and improve the republican commite for the better. she is for offshore drilling which is awesome because offshore drilling means no more forgin oil and more money for the united states. and as far as im cncenered the whole pregnant issue is and should not even be concidered an issue and i dont think it will or should effect the campaign at all!! it is a very personal and private issue and they dont need the media or the democrats breathing down their throats about it!

Posted by: lindsey | September 2, 2008 8:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

im sorry to say but i think u r very wrong sen mcain did not just choose saah palin for his running mate just because she is a woman he choose her because she is a very bright and intelligent woman with expirience and will only help change and improve the republican commite for the better. she is for offshore drilling which is awesome because offshore drilling means no more forgin oil and more money for the united states. and as far as im cncenered the whole pregnant issue is and should not even be concidered an issue and i dont think it will or should effect the campaign at all!! it is a very personal and private issue and they dont need the media or the democrats breathing down their throats about it!

Posted by: lindsey | September 2, 2008 8:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn--

I understand your concern about whether Governor Palin can handle the Vice-Presidency job, given all that she has on her plate.

All you examples you cited, however, are past based (on your own experience and other peoples'). My question to you is....how do you know what this woman (Sarah Palin) is made of? She is paving the way for history and the opening of many doors for other women who will follow her.

After all we females have fought for .... demanding equal opportunity in the workplace, isn't it a little anti-feminist to suggest that we should once again....let the circumstances of our lives dictate to us our limitations. Ms. Palin appears to have many supportive people around her (including her husband and family) who are willing to empower her. She also seems to have born with a rare leadership quality that is much needed for our country right now.

I applaud her for her willingness to take this challenge on.....looking to create a giant possibility in the future and allowing all the forces in the universe to align with her commitment. She has my support to have it all work--her career, her family and her obvious love of these United States. We as women have all come too far to turn back now.

--Melody Leo
Seattle, WA

Posted by: Melody Leo | September 2, 2008 8:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In the trying days ahead, who is going to need Sarah Palin more - 300 million Americans or 1 - 17 year old child trying to figure out how to be a mom. Who wins, who loses? McCain is to blame.

Posted by: Will Merritt | September 2, 2008 8:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn--

I understand your concern about whether Governor Palin can handle the Vice-Presidency job, given all that she has on her plate.

All you examples you cited, however, are past based (on your own experience and other peoples'). My question to you is....how do you know what this woman (Sarah Palin) is made of? She is paving the way for history and the opening of many doors for other women who will follow her.

After all we females have fought for .... demanding equal opportunity in the workplace, isn't it a little anti-feminist to suggest that we should once again....let the circumstances of our lives dictate to us our limitations. Ms. Palin appears to have many supportive people around her (including her husband and family) who are willing to empower her. She also seems to have born with a rare leadership quality that is much needed for our country right now.

I applaud her for her willingness to take this challenge on.....looking to create a giant possibility in the future and allowing all the forces in the universe to align with her commitment. She has my support to have it all work--her career, her family and her obvious love of these United States. We as women have all come too far to turn back now.

--Melody Leo


Posted by: Melody Leo | September 2, 2008 8:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Geek,
The job of Secretary of State has already been filled, but I hear Obama needs someone to clean his toilets. Unfortunately since you admitted to using controlled substances you are unqualifed for a government job to clean toilets, but I hear the DNC needs a new Chairman.

Sounds like you'd fit well. I'll forward your letter immediately.

Respectfully,
JM

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 8:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm sure that Sally Quinn would have no problem with flushing a baby with Down's Syndrome down the toilet. At what point in time did Quinn become an expert in Christianity or in God? Answer: Never.

Posted by: Jim | September 2, 2008 8:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why do people keep saying that it is a mistake for a woman to have a baby? Why do people attribute the decision to have a baby as poor judgment? Babies are not evil. They are not a punishment. What despicable people invented such a lie?

Babies are innocent and defenseless human life and deserve to have their lives protected from those who would kill them. What respectable person doesn't know this?

Save the babies! Abort the Democrats!

Posted by: Britcom | September 2, 2008 8:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You said it all! Anyone who says diffrent is not being intellectually honest.

Posted by: The TRUTH! | September 2, 2008 8:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you Sally Quinn for your honest analysis of Ms Palin as the prospective VP of the United States.
A columnist in the British paper, "The Guardian" gave a succinct response from Europe, "Has McCain Gone Insane?"
The issue is not whether Ms Palin is a nice person, or whether she prays every night. The question is whether she is fit, in McCain's words to take over the presidency."
This is not a game of the "Emperor's new Clothes"
It would make the US the laughing stock of the world
She was selected for one reason alone, to draw in the right wing Evangelicals to support McCain.
For no other reason.
With the world facing massive upheavel from climate change we don't need someone who blows off this deadly issue like a child's game.
Polar bears don't deserve to be on receiving end of a gun toting Annie Oakley!
The nation's economy is in a shambles. We need someone who has at least a semblence of economic understanding.
Opening up the Alaska Wildlife Preserve for oil exploration is a reckless act. What does Ms Palin understand about the world's energy needs?
The list goes on and on. We all know it.
When the order collapses, everyone suffers.
Global warming also affects Republicans.
Let's see this for what it is. McCain is impulsive and reckless. I shudder to see him as our next president

Posted by: lionsden | September 2, 2008 8:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Not to be critical but Chelsea Clinton is an adult. And for the poster who finds it helpful to rehash Bill Clinton, it's time to get over it.

Tell me why Palin is a better choice than the other multiple well-qualified conservatives, men and women? I don't understand why this is a question that is still unanswered. Don't you think that this is a question that people like Lindsey Graham must be asking?

Where is he, by the way?

Posted by: Delilah | September 2, 2008 8:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The issue of whether Sarah Palin is or is not a good mother does not belong in this discussion. Some of the posts are correct. Her daughters situation is, as Sen. Obama has insisted, is also not the issue for political discussion. What is, is Gob. Palin's record as being more right wing than Pres. Reagan and Sen.Conservite (Barry Goldwater. Some of her positions are off the chart. And these are the areas that should get all the attention. Secondly, serving on the city council, serving as Mayor of a small town in a small (population wise) state is not the same as Vice=President of the US,
As for the "executive experience" gained from being Governor of the state that is ranked 47th in population, it is a no brainer. She may be smart and accomplished for where she is, but do you really want someone so clueless about national affairs to be a heart beat away from the office of President. If McCain wanted a woman there were many more qualified ladies in the Republican party.

Posted by: Ira | September 2, 2008 8:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a conservative and I love the choice of Governor Palin. She is authentic. A real American. She is not a contrived, political opportunist, manufacturing by a political machine (Obama), maneuvering for the Presidency for the past 15 years.

Sally, you are dead wrong. I was on the sidelines until this selection because I am sick and tired of career politicians.

Governor Palin is the real deal and the more she and her children are attacked the more she will be supported. No one likes it when someone is bullied.

Your tone is elitist. You sound like a snob. I am a very well educated, high income, conservative, and I will vote for McCain, and contribute, because of Palin!!!

Posted by: GoConservative1776 | September 2, 2008 8:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The issue of whether Sarah Palin is or is not a good mother does not belong in this discussion. Some of the posts are correct. Her daughters situation is, as Sen. Obama has insisted, is also not the issue for political discussion. What is, is Gob. Palin's record as being more right wing than Pres. Reagan and Sen.Conservite (Barry Goldwater. Some of her positions are off the chart. And these are the areas that should get all the attention. Secondly, serving on the city council, serving as Mayor of a small town in a small (population wise) state is not the same as Vice=President of the US,
As for the "executive experience" gained from being Governor of the state that is ranked 47th in population, it is a no brainer. She may be smart and accomplished for where she is, but do you really want someone so clueless about national affairs to be a heart beat away from the office of President. If McCain wanted a woman there were many more qualified ladies in the Republican party.

Posted by: Ira | September 2, 2008 8:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What about those military families where the wife leaves behind her kids to deploy?!?! How do those families pull it off?
As far as Palin's experience...if the founding fathers felt the need for special qualifications they would have spelled it out. Government by the people, for the people! She looks like the average person sick of the Democratic party's miserable performance when controlling the house and senate. What ever happen to Pelosi's "1st 100 days" in power. Why not do a "news" piece on that one!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 8:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow! What a poor analysis and conclusion. Do you get paid to do this?

Posted by: RandalH | September 2, 2008 8:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Senator McCain,

I would like the position of Secretary of State. The allure of foreign travel and the occasional use of Air Force One major attractions.

I have a passport, have visited NYC and Washington DC and have been exposed to many who are not US citizens. I have visited most of the Carrbbean Islands so one could say I am experienced in foreign affairs. I have been married for 32+ years and have a teenage daughter and experienced in the art of diplomacy and negotiating tough economic issues.

Most of the automobiles I own and the electronics I buy are made in other countries, so I have experience in foreign trade.

I am both pro choice and pro life. I support my wife's and daughters desire to make choices since I am motivated not to be killed and thus am pro life.

I am Jewish which may be a problem in the middle east, but frankly am Jewish lite, which means I don't have milk with my ham sandwiches.

It is clear that I will fit in with the McCain Palin team, where those pesky subjects, such as background, experience and knowledge can be set aside to give a break to a nice guy.

I look forward to joining the Whitehouse team and having never been arrested, have been with the same employer for over 30 years, am University educated am confident that I will pass the vetting process. There however was this incident in college 34 years ago with 2 women, which is now a faded memory. Oh yeah I did smoke dope, did inhale and frankly enjoyed it at the time.

Give me a call after the election and we can talk.

Regards,

Geek


Posted by: geek | September 2, 2008 8:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I reading that men and woman can both be 'mothers.' WRONG! Fathers can be father but they can't be mothers. Get over it. Women are created to conceive, give birth and nurture. Every intelligent pediatrician in this country will attest to the importance of raising children with a nurturing mother, particularly in the first seven years of life when the child first forms their identity. The fathering is also important from a male perspective, but no father can 'mother.' That is why God made TWO different sexes! What is frankly appalling to me is that the liberals are more conservative on this issue than the CONSERVATIVES! Suddenly their gal might be the V.P. and just as suddenly all the typical traditional roles for men and women fly right out the window. Who cares if she leaves her 5 y/o and 5 month old behind in AK while she flits around the lower 48? Who cares if her teenage daughter is pregnant and will have face enormous challenges of her own raising that child, with a young man who apparently from news reports really didn't want the child! You conservatives are falling through the cracks. You have given up every single Christian conservative principle to support St. Sarah! Shame!

Posted by: anniemargret | September 2, 2008 8:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why the strong reaction to Sarah Palin? She scares the daylights out of a corrupt media who has allready had the coronation of the "chosen one" at Invesco Field. Why, someone might turn the queston of "experience" around and actually ask Barak Obama about his experience to be, not Vice-President, but President. No one ever asks Democrat women if they can handle elected office and a family at home. This IS what feminists worked for, that women be treated the same, but, I guess, not if you are a REPUBLICAN woman!

Posted by: Doug | September 2, 2008 8:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What's wrong the Baptist Faith and Message? I guess you have some issues with the Bible as well. Marriage is representative of the relationship we have with Christ. Believers are the bride of Christ and must submit to his headship. The same goes for marriages. You cannot have two heads.

Colossians 3:18-19 says, "Wives, be subject to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. Husbands, love your wives and do not be embittered against them." Ephesians 5:22-29 says, "Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body. But as the church is subject to Christ, so also the wives ought to be to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her, so that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, that He might present to Himself the church in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing; but that she would be holy and blameless. So husbands ought also to love their own wives as their own bodies. He who loves his own wife loves himself; for no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ also does the church."

It's funny how liberals ignore this. I'll be honest, the happiest women I've met in my life (my wonderful wife included) are those who understand what biblical submission really means. To folks like you, it means being a slave. But to godly women, it means loving and honoring their husband as the head of their household. You're in my prayers.

Posted by: Ryan | September 2, 2008 8:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

While you , with all of your "sophistication" will be a glorified beat reporter for the paper, Sarah Palin will be Vice President.
I cant believe your hypocrisy!All of a sudden your worried about the job qualifications of a mother with children? If she was applying for CEO and was turned down, you would be protesting. (and rightfully so)
And where you to question Obamas lack of experience?
At least be consistent!!

Posted by: Sally Quinn is just Jealous | September 2, 2008 8:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow Sally! What a sexist pig you have become. You mean to tell me that a woman can't tackle career and family? Are there things to high for working moms? Even those worth a bucket of warm uh..spit?

Or excuse me should she be at the top of the ticket because that's where the amateurs belong- just like the Dems have it?

Or maybe experience is required of Republicans but non-essential for Dems!

Or maybe it's ok to apply standards to Republicans but not Democrats! After all Republicans are always harping that kind of thing...

Or maybe it's all of the above coupled with the fact that the left believes its ok to do whatever needs to be done to win...

Pathetic............

Posted by: Wes Walton | September 2, 2008 8:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

For those of you who are so charmed with hockey mommy Palin, keep in mind that most Republicans are conservative non-evangelicals. In my city where most voters are Republican, John McCain's choice is not seen particularly favorably. Many view Palin as a less than steller choice and an insult to the the voters who support real conservative views. The conservative moniker has nothing to do with this craziness related to social issues. It is based on economic principles which Palin does not understand to the depth to at least qualify her for VEEP.

This choice has nothing to do with what's best for this country or as McCain phrases it "Country First". The real slogan should be "me first". It's simply viewed by McCain as a means to power by using a "woman" to give him a leg up. It is cynical and dishonest. He's still pissed off that he wasn't the candidate in 2000 when he was the real McCain not the current imposter. What short memories Americans have! This is truly Dubya's third campaign and he should be proud that he is responsible for compromising the real McCain.

And for VEEP, instead of Darth Vader, we have a character and story straight out of a tawdry dime store novel. Palin has forsaken her family for the bright lights of broadway. And she couldn't care less.

Posted by: patryot | September 2, 2008 8:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is a hypocrite! Her statement: "We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents."

'Decision' to have her baby? Did Bristol REALLY have a choice? The same choice that Palin now wants to deny all Americans?

Palin would not be a hypocrite if she said "We forced Bristol keep her baby and are proud to become grandparents."

Posted by: Buddydog | September 2, 2008 8:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It makes me sad that so many Americans call other Americans hateful names rather than being able to say "I disagree with you, and this is why"

I will be voting for Obama, but I am disappointed by your analysis. Palin has a number of very interesting qualities, and there are still a few things about her that are also troubling. If McCain was serious about his repeated criticism of Obama's experience, he would never have selected Palin. Clearly he did not believe his own words. I am disturbed by the lack of judgement shown in flying while pregnant, and by her interest in teaching creationism in public schools. I love her willingness to strike out against corruption, even within her own party.

Personally I think experience is overrated as a requirement, and clearly Senator McCain agrees with me. I'm not voting for experience, I'm voting for someone who will hold a vision for a better America. Obama is effectively the Democratic party version of Ronald Reagan, with a better intellect. I've had it with mediocre thinkers in the white house. The most critical thing a president does is appoint qualified people, and picking Biden says something good about Obama's judgement. The Palin pick, especially if the reports on how it was done are accurate, reflects less well on McCain in my judgement.

Please stop attacking other Americans and focus on the issues, actions, and goals. We've had enough senseless rage.

Posted by: Colin | September 2, 2008 8:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Congratulations for parroting every left wing cliche' that has been bandied about since Governor Palin was announced, all in one article. I especially like the "one heartbeat away" line. Talk about fear tactics. The same party who (allegedly) champions change and equality for women now turns their spin machine loose on her private family matters, even questioning her mothering skills. Way to go!

Amazing country we live in, that is until the Dems turn it into the Socialist States of America.

Posted by: John Q. Patriot | September 2, 2008 8:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother. She's a bad mother.

Posted by: Ken | September 2, 2008 8:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn's bio from www.charlierose.com/guests/sally-quinn

"Quinn began as a reporter for the "Post" with very little experience, but soon became expert at getting subjects to talk more than they'd expect."

Shouldn't she have started out as a reporter for a little newspaper in Podunkville, Arkansas? Evidently, she thought more of herself than she gives other people credit for.

"But it's not Vice President Quinn was going for." OK fine, then what about Obama, who would be president? Is that not the 800lb. gorilla in the room that the MSM is trying to avoid? You can't have it both ways, hypocrite.

Posted by: SQ Hypocrisy | September 2, 2008 8:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What Judgmental gall!
Weren't you having an affair with your boss before you were married? Where was your moral compass?
Hey, if that's what you wanted fine but then don't judge a 17 yr old kid and blame her parents for her mistake.

And to the competency of Mrs. Palin.
Maybe you should travel out west where we think differently.
We like to be independent and live and let live.
This is an incredibly accomplished woman who would be an asset to that table where all these men are making decisions.

Posted by: Charlotte Hoffman | September 2, 2008 8:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maybe the Democrats haven forgotten a president who lied to the American people about a sex act in the Oval Office and who left office with the country in a recession. Reasons for the decisions of some politicians on both sides amaze me. Which ever president we end up with will make little difference to the United States. Only to the media.

Posted by: Remy Reulet | September 2, 2008 8:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I really cannot believe how wrong you are. I think that she is an excellent choice and will be an excellent VP.

Posted by: Nancy in Nashville | September 2, 2008 8:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Talk about unbiased reporting, what a joke. Why not just say preface the article by saying that your a dedicated democrat.

Posted by: brian | September 2, 2008 8:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I just saw your interview in regards to the fact that Palin should put her family first. You seem to have quite a few questions as to whether or not she can balance the needs of her 5 children (one with Down syndrome and one that is pregnant)with the demands of the VP job. You said in the interview that you found it very difficully to raise one child with disability. Did you ever think that maybe she is just better at it than you. Maybe it was tough for you because of your lack of skills. It might be that she can raise 5 kids and hold an important, all consuming job. Oh wait, we know whe can because she has. As for her 17 year old pregnant daughter, it happens everywhere to all types. White, Black, Christian, Jewish, Rich, Poor, Middle Class, Country Girls, City Girls, Northern Girls, Southern Girls and the list goes on so to imply that he daughter's pregnancy is in anyway the result of her lack of attention is just wrong and you know it.

Posted by: Michael | September 2, 2008 8:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gee. You type real fast there!

Posted by: dibbs@yahoo.com | September 2, 2008 8:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

LIFE is THE most important family value, and it trumps all the rest.

Roe v. Wade gave Sarah Palin and Bristol Palin a choice; the most important choice any woman will ever make.

They both chose Life for their unborn babies even though society told them they didn't have to accept that responsibility. They both considered their options and they both decided that the death of a child, even though legal, is still an unacceptable result. They both chose correctly, and they are both heroes for having shown such courage.

The fact that they were both willing to put the life of their child ahead of their own academic and political careers is breathtakingly selfless and undeniably respectable.

Sarah and Bristol Palin's humanitarian definition of Family Values is a stark and refreshing contrast to the venial and bloody alternative promoted by the Pro-Abortion death cult that now infects the political left in this country. Apparently the media has blinded themselves to this fact in their rush to sway public opinion against these two great American women.

FROM THIS DAY FORWARD Sarah and Bristol Palin will be towering icons for the Pro-Life movement; much to the consternation of the leftist Democrats and their viciously protective Hollywood/News Media jackals.

Posted by: Britcom | September 2, 2008 8:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a disgusting woman !! The Bastion of Equal Rights for Women is putting down a woman for being a working mother. The real truth is that because Sarah Palin does not fit Quinn's idea of what a female candidate should look like, a small town girl who married her high school sweetheart that likes to hunt and fish, Quinn the social snob is absolutely naseauous at the prospect. Sorry Sally but you are out of touch with America. There are many more like Sarah Palin then there are like you....THANK GOD! If you have an empty stomach you can read Sally Quinn's full piece here:Palin's Pregnancy Problem

Posted by: jim | September 2, 2008 8:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I worry about the state of education in our country when I see so many people equating Palin's "inexperience" as a small-town mayor and small state governor with Obama's "inexperience" as a law review editor, teacher of constitutional law and United States senator. Where's our critical thinking? Is there any evidence that Palin has given a thought to the constitution, or that her intelligence is capacious, creative, or national in scope? Obama has wanted to help the poor. Has Palin's public service been in the interests of anyone but herself? If so, I don't see it, and I've been glued to this story since Friday. Now I see that she's cut funding to help pregnant teenagers. She'll help her own teenager, but the others are on their own? Come on, people. Being a decent (so far as we know), smart, overconfident human being with a family is one thing. But doesn't she have to be QUALIFIED to be Vice President?

Posted by: Teacher | September 2, 2008 8:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The democrats have managed to make women dirty and now they are trying to make babies seem dirty. It is the demoncrat wing of the party running into the dark side of Camelot led by Hollywood and the warped. Add an N and you have no way. Goofballs and screwballs cloaked in religious fever. New frontiers for the N word.

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 2, 2008 8:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gee, all these years, liberals have been telling us it's OK for 16 year old Johnny to have a sex change operation and for 14 year old Suzie to have an abortion without parental permission, but now, they want us to be shocked, SHOCKED!, that a 17-year old girl is pregnant!!! All of their pseudo-moralizing will be seen for what it is. Ironically enough, we wouldn't even know about her pregnancy except for her brave, and correct, decision to keep the child, unlike the liberals who have no qualms whatsoever about infanticide.

Posted by: Truman Show | September 2, 2008 8:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Finally, someone with the courage to tell the truth! The real issue is the total lack of judgement by both John McCain (him for offering her the job) and Sarah Palin (she for accepting it).

As a working mother of two working a more or less normal 9 - 5 job with the occasional business trip, I know how hard it is to balance home and work.

There is no way she can do a good job at being VP ( a 24/7 job) and a Mom. While everyone praises her for having a baby with Downs Syndrome (and I completely agree with that as I am pro-life) she also needs to take care of it (along with her other children and teenage daughter). The bottom line is that this is not a good time in her life to do that, due to other committment as a mother. In another 10 or 12 years maybe, not now.

Posted by: Sue | September 2, 2008 8:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Now that we have our choices...
I would rather have someone with limited foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency (Palin) than IN the presidency (Obama).

Sally, this is just advance sour grapes b/c your side is going to lose because of this choice. I was ho-hum about McCain but this VP pick is FANTASTIC, and completely outflanked the Dems. I, a pro-life Virginia Catholic, am re-energized, as is the McCain campaign.

Typical cynicism from a "progressive"...you can't celebrate a woman being picked for VP (or secretary of state) because she's not on your side.

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 8:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation."

The above statement, mockingly quoted by Ms. Quinn, is 100% Biblical. She really is out of touch with most Americans...clinking glasses at her high-brow political parties. Oh, how sophisticated she is!

Now along comes Mrs. Palin. Quinn questions her readiness..whoever heard of her, etc. Whoever heard of Barack Obama before????? He's basically a Ivy-League trained community activist. C'mon. Sally, your bias against conservative, church-going, God-fearing women is all-too apparent.

Didn't your interview with Dr. Norris of 4th Presbyterian Church teach you anything about people of genuine Christ-centered faith? When will you grow-up and take leave of your hard-left socialist/secular mantra? I had thought there was hope for you. You disappoint me.

Posted by: Robert B | September 2, 2008 8:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Shame on you, Sally, for your anti-women article. I suppose all mothers should stay at home in the kitchen, not even considering ever doing a man's job like running for office!

I would take Sarah Palin over Joe Biden any day. He is arrogant, can't even shut himself up when he knows he needs to, and stole not just another poltician's speech, but his LIFE STORY and tried to adopt it as his own. He has the integrity of... well, of a failed TV news anchor who thinks because she couldn't handle a job, means no woman can.

I am an Independent from Delaware who will be voting for McCain / Palin... and voting for no more politics as usual! Reform in Washington!

Posted by: Delawarean Indy | September 2, 2008 8:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You forgot to mention she smoked pot and inhaled and shes willing to jail people for using pot as medicine because it sends the wrong message. What message is now being sent to young horny girls in high school?

Shes against gays.....believes theres a god?....is not grounded in Economic/Science....she wants creationism taught....she's simply a moron in my book.....NEVER McSAME!

Posted by: Castklearr | September 2, 2008 8:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

New Orleans is doomed. They tried and it's just one big mess, leading to another bigger mess. Dumb people and subsidies can't trump capital. You need be brain damaged to put money there. It was the Big Easy minus the love. Love is true and money makes money jokers. New Orleans gave birth to something worth killing so God killed it. It was born to be bad and it is bad. It could get worse. Cities rise and fall. Below sea level, the chances are many and opportunities are few. Welcome to Atlantis. A total waste of cash and cash doesn't grow on trees. And people think Sally is evil...We have a whole evil city here being doomed by divine right.

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 2, 2008 8:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sexism is alive and well - in the female ranks of the main stream media. Sally - you're a sexist.

Just an FYI - I planned on sitting out this election. Palin has changed my mind. I'm not alone. McCain's selection was brilliant.

Her daughter's pregnancy is a non-issue except as fodder for the mendacious Obama left.

Posted by: jim | September 2, 2008 8:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You raise some great points and pull heart strings when you say "her first priority should be her children", but you neglect the fact that she is a married woman. If her husband was a widower, he would have to raise all those children (including the 4 month old) by himself. Would he need all the remaining female members of his family to swoop in and take over? Probably not. Want to bring up the DUI 20 yrs ago...what mistakes did you make when you were 20 something? But then again, he isn't running for office and I'm sure Washington D.C. is full of spouses with "indiscretions" that don't make the news.
Further, there are plenty of military families where the wife deploys with the military overseas and the husband is left with the family. Yes, some of them have children with special needs too. It's hard, but military families pull together to support the spouse and for their country. Let us give Mr. Palin and his family some credit.
As far as her experience, I seem to recall a certain Arkansas governor who didn't have a whole lot of foreign policy experience when he was elected president. At least Gov Palin's state has a large budget, borders two different countries, and is as large as Texas and California combined. She probably has more constituents than Biden and Pelosi combined too.
I think Gov Palin and her family are closer in resembling a modern American family than most in government who try to present themselves as "perfect". Most of us don't get to go to Harvard Law school.
Try to find something that is really news worthy than this flashy/trashy tabloid piece. I'm sure your journalism professors are not very proud of you for this. I know I'm not. Obama says to lay off the families!

Posted by: Some missed points | September 2, 2008 8:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sexism is alive and well - in the female ranks of the main stream media. Sally - you're a sexist.

Just an FYI - I planned on sitting out this election. Palin has changed my mind. I'm not alone. McCain's selection was brilliant.

Her daughter's pregnancy is a non-issue except as fodder for the mendacious Obama left.

Posted by: jim | September 2, 2008 8:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

These "Family Values Voters" have been dealing with the fact of unplanned pregnancies for years. There is Nothing New Under The Sun. They will not waiver in their support.

Posted by: Beth Orrell | September 2, 2008 7:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

New Orleans is doomed. They tried and it's just one big mess, leading to another bigger mess. Dumb people and subsidies can't trump capital. You need be brain damaged to put money there. It was the Big Easy minus the love. Love is true and money makes money jokers. New Orleans gave birth to something worth killing so God killed it. It born to be bad and it is bad. It could get worse. Cities rise and fall. Below sea level, the chances are many and opportunities are few. Welcome to Atlantis. A total waste of cash and cash doesn't grow on trees. And people think Sally is evil...We have a whole evil city here being doomed by divine right.

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 2, 2008 7:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

just how is mothers' role "different" from a fathers? i should think a liberal like you would be happy, perhaps, overjoyed at the prospect of a woman holding the second highest office in the land [according to you and all other liberals, just a single heartbeat away from the highest office] but no your true colors stand out-- it not about true feminism, its about pushing the liberal agenda by ripping apart those that you disagree with. and coincidentally, those that are more successful than you; your failure was your failure-- don't project your failure[s] onto others. and furthermore, who are you to tell us what the right reasons for electing someone are.... are not my resaons and thoughts as valid as yours-- i'm educated, well read on the subject in question. thank you soooo much for telling all the rest of us what the "wrong" reasons are. thank you so much for your wisdom. by the way, if barbara bush told you that nothing could've prepared them for the rigors of the vice presidency, then why does it matter how much experince she has??? SHE HAS WAY MORE EXPERIENCE THAN THE TOP OF THE DEMOS TICKET!!!! and if mccain should "have the big one" while in office, do you demos think that she'll just be there left all by herself?? -- i mean that's how you're all hysterically blogging and whining, she might call onsomebody who has "loads" of foreign policy experience, like , i don't know joe biden-- oh wait baryy hussein obama already copped to that!! yes it's a calculated move; that's what happen in prediential politics-- it is one of the biggest gambles ever-- like you don't think mccain thoguht of that [ i predict it'll pay off bigtime; i think she'll destroy biden in their debates] you also forgot mention as positives:1] shes a reformer 2] she snuffed out corruption [has barack??] 3]she told feds "no thanks" onbridge to nowhere 4] she has more oil & gas [thus energy] experience than ALL THREE OF THE MEN INVOLVED in the race [ psst-- guess what, this means she does have some national security experience, as we all know this is a natl. sec. issue!] and as family values voter her honesty and integrity about her daughter's situation is awesome; we "value voters" recognize that nobody lives up to the standards that HE sets for us. however we recognize that people make mistakes, like plagarizing entire speeches rep,eatedly for instance,we "values voters" aren't concerned with the "hypocrite" label the way you libs are-- we're much more concerned with NOT being able to be called bay killers, so we do the right thing-- respect life and get married. Palin is tough as nails. you're ticked b/c it IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY / THE CONSERVATIVE VIEWPOINT that is advancing a woman toward the oval office; it is THE REPUBLICAN PARTY / THE CONSERVATIVE VIEWPOITN that is bringing in a real outsider for change to washington-- isn't it!?!?! PLUS, SHE A FRIGGIN' BEAUTY QUENN THAT CANHANDLE A GUN AND WAS A STAR ATHLETE.... jealous a bit,eh sally quinn....

Posted by: ted smith | September 2, 2008 7:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

After reading this article, I'm left with the impression that only thing cynical about is it's author. I expected something that exhibited a person of faith and not something straight out of Democrat Party's handbook. Disappointing to say the least.

Posted by: Wes | September 2, 2008 7:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Redlum: Is integrity what prompted Palin to fire the city's police chief and library director? Did you read what her reasoning was? "Accusing them of not fully supporting her efforts to govern." What a joke.

She strong-arms various public officials under color of authority.

Her husband has a DUI.

Her 17-year-old daughter is photographed drinking on numerous occasions and gets knocked up by her boyfriend.

And this is what three days has revealed. Image what will come to light in two months.

Palin will go down as the worst vice presidential selection in the history of our country. Democrats are laughing all the way to the Presidency.

Posted by: Another | September 2, 2008 7:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The merchants of doom showed up for the party.
"We are all doomed to make mistakes."
That's just the One Corps people talking smack.
We are not all doomed, just some of us are doomed. You are known by the company you keep, so the Edwards people are doomed by degree. Obama is an Edwards loyalist, before that he was a Rev. Wright loyalist. All these loyalties fell apart. Stay loyal to the country and those who support the country. The village people can't stop the U.S. Navy. It's mission impossible for the bozo's, so get over it. Love of country makes liberty possible and to thine own self remain true. Blackjack isn't flying. You get shot down in flames, what a shame.

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 2, 2008 7:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The merchants of doom showed up for the party.
"We are all doomed to make mistakes."
That's just the One Corps people talking smack.
We are not all doomed, just some of us are doomed. You are known by the company you keep, so the Edwards people are doomed by degree. Obama is an Edwards loyalist, before that he was a Rev. Wright loyalist. All these loyalties fell apart. Stay loyal to the country and those who support the country. The village people can't stop the U.S. Navy. It's mission impossible for the bozo's, so get over it. Love of country makes liberty possible and to thine own self remain true. Blackjack isn't flying. You get shot down in flames, what a shame.

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 2, 2008 7:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am an independant leaning towards McCain. I was happy to see him choose a woman, however her lack of experience is troubling, as is Obama's. I also feel that with a 4 month old baby and a pregnant 17 year old daughter, now is the time to cut back on work not add to it 10 times. Her family needs her. At this point I don't know who to vote for.

Posted by: Kathy | September 2, 2008 7:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow Sally, how far into the future must we go before selecting a women as Vice President will not be viewed as cynical? What happened to "we can have it all," a family and career? Don't look now, but your hypocrisy is showing.

Posted by: Jerry Pomeroy | September 2, 2008 7:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If you are going to quote from the Southern Baptist Faith and message at least quote the whole part of that statement:
"The husband and wife are of equal worth before God, since both are created in God's image. The marriage relationship models the way God relates to His people. A husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. He has the God-given responsibility to provide for, to protect, and to lead his family. A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation."

You try to make it seem like us Southern Baptists think women are inferior, yet the very first line of that section says they are equals. It also says the Husband is to love his wife to the same extent Christ loved the church. That means he is to be willing to die for her, it says the wife is to assist the husband, so who really gets off worse from that.

Posted by: Andrew Mitchell | September 2, 2008 7:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh I get it - it's a dumb blond thing right?

It is the arrogance of Obama that prevented the dems and libs like you sally from having a woman on the ticket. Now you're p o'd that McCain did what your savior couldn't. Palin is more woman and has more integrity in her little finger than you do and it's killing you. Don't you have a hair appointment or massage to run to?

Posted by: Redlum | September 2, 2008 7:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Had Chelsea Clinton shown up on the campaign trail this spring with a baby bump, or worse, was reported to have had an abortion, I'm certain Sally Quinn would have advised Hilary to give up the campaign and tend to her motherly duties.

Yeah, right!

Posted by: William Dalton | September 2, 2008 7:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Good grief. Get over it Sally. Focus on the real problems and forget this teenager. This is so unimportant. we have a country to run. For get this sill y stuff. Thank you cjhjlh@hughes.net

Posted by: cjhjlh@hughes.net | September 2, 2008 7:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Really? Just because you were so weak, you have to extend that to all other women (except Hillary)? I suspect that, as usual, the majority of Sarah Palin's critics will be second place finishers and non-finishers, but I doubt this woman's political career will be over even if McCain/Palin lose.

It remains to be seen, whether she has the mettle to survive all of the liberal attacks and succeed. I suspect she does, but you are betting the ranch that she doesn't. If they win, for what will you be remembered?

Posted by: Lyman | September 2, 2008 7:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You chose to leave the clinton brat alone but were on the Bush Twins and now on Ms. Palin's daughter. You folks are disgusting.

Posted by: Don Coffey | September 2, 2008 7:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with much of your post and appreciate your candor when discussing your own experience as a mother. I think this is an excellent opportunity for Americans to come together and discuss our teen pregnancy epidemic. Abstinance only doesn't work and we need genuine solutions for real families. We also need to address the hypocrisy that exists regarding the racial and socioeconomic issues of teen pregnancy. An unwed teen mother of color is seen as a blight on society, whereas an unwed teen like Palin's daughter is seen as a champion for "Life" and "Family Values" by the religious right.

Posted by: Sunnydale | September 2, 2008 7:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

SALLY QUINN TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT SARAH PALIN WHAT WAS JOHN THINKING HIS JUDGEMENT AINT WHAT IT SHOULD BE FOLKS

Posted by: Buddy Jones | September 2, 2008 7:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is a smart, tough, accomplished woman who made it on her own and not on the coat tails of her husband. I'm confident she'll withstand the withering attacks from the left and hope that the vile criticism hurled her way will motivate voters to give McCain/Palin a landslide victory in November.

I have many friends on the right and the left of the political spectrum and I feel compelled to say that those on the left, overall, show more prejudice, intolerance, disdain and downright mean spiritedness than my right of center friends.

Posted by: stella e | September 2, 2008 7:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Mrs. Quinn,

I think you give "values voters" too little credit, by inferring that somehow an unwed, teenage mother is beyond our ability to forgive.

Let's go over a few things here.

We know, and are taught 3 basic things about human nature:

1. We are all doomed to make mistakes.
2. Just because you teach your children values, does not mean they have to agree with them, or abide by your standards for living.
3. If someone makes a mistake, you forgive them, and help them deal with the consequences lovingly, because you could be next.

You are engaging in wishful thinking if you believe evangelicals will punish the McCain ticket over this. If nothing else, there will be an outpouring of empathy.

I believe I speak for most "Values Voters" when I say that you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about when it comes to this subject.

If the Post wants someone to write about issues of Faith, they should probably hire someone who understands what it means to possess it in some way, shape, or form.

Posted by: Kurt | September 2, 2008 7:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think Sarah is right on! McCain is showing his age with his decisions. Sarah Palin need to be at home with her sick child and pregnant tween.

Posted by: Leekma Knutsen | September 2, 2008 7:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally has almost reached anti-Christ status here. I've met several of them and they were all guys, guys. If she is paid by the responses, she should have plenty of cash by Christmas. It beats the hell out of plastic. Everybody wants to beat up the messenger and they are all the same. Plastic people spending plastic money, looking for somebody to blame for their troubles. This whole thing looks like a bad mortgage of ideas launched out of desperation. McCain has 7 houses and a beer heiress. I have beer here, so I'm happy as hell and another beer away from being happier. I could use a good woman, but that will take more time. I hope I have it because life is short, so can we all give Sally a break. WHAT A BUNCH OF BALL BUSTERS AMERICANS ARE BECOMING. Have a drink and relax.

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 2, 2008 7:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

What flavor of koolaid are you drinking? Retract your claws and take another look at. You've had 18 months to investigate your savior Obama and still no one knows a thing about him or about his radical friends. Shame on you, your bias is showing.

Red

Posted by: Redlum | September 2, 2008 7:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How can you on one breathe critisize her for not staying at home and taking care of her children and on the next critisize a church for saying the same thing. This is a knee jerk reaction to her being asked. As a Moderate I find it very offensive the way the media has attacked her apparrent lack of expirence, yet gives Obama such a pass. Everything I have heard about her has been either supportive or lashing out. There has been no middle ground. How can a "soccer mom" have polarized our country in a weekend? I think instead we are seeing the true nature of the agenda based media!

Posted by: Geof Lickey | September 2, 2008 7:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

It appears you and your pals in the Obama biased, left-winged media are panicking, squirming, and spewing sour grapes as a result of McCain's choice of Palin. Her selection as a vice-presidential nominee IS a game changer.

It is nice to know that you and your ilk are "angry." It feels good.

Posted by: Vic Coelho | September 2, 2008 7:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

It appears you and your pals in the Obama biased, left-winged media are panicking, squirming, and spewing sour grapes as a result of McCain's choice of Palin. Her selection as a vice-presidential nominee IS a game changer.

It is nice to know that you and your ilk are "angry." It feels good.

Posted by: Vic Coelho | September 2, 2008 7:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I once thought Sally Quinn had some class. No more.

Posted by: Steve McCurdy | September 2, 2008 7:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

" It is a choice made to try to win an election" - DUH!!!!

I'm so sick of hearing what will happen if McCain dies in office and Palin becomes President. Here's what will happen: She will nominate a vice president who will need to be confirmed by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress. I'm sure she is smart enough, if this happens, to nominate someone who might be stronger in the areas she might be weak in, NOT UNLIKE BARACK OBAMA PICKING JOE BIDEN TO FILL IN HIS WEAK SPOTS! Com'on you news folks: do us a favor and educate us instead of whining about who's going to take care of Palin's kids - her husband, of course, like many other husbands of wives with demanding jobs!

Posted by: Kathy Brundin | September 2, 2008 7:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I once thought Sally Quinn had some class. No more.

Posted by: Steve McCurdy | September 2, 2008 7:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
Thanks for your remarks on CNN today. Your vile remarks managed to offend working women/mothers,(yes, I am one) wonderful fathers, (yes, my husband is one) and Christians (yes, I am one), and will only serve to energize those of us who believe that Sarah Palin will be a remarkable Vice President. Keep up the good work, and we'll see John McCain and Sarah Palin in the White House in January.

Posted by: Karen Martin | September 2, 2008 7:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally - the far left leanings of the Washington Post editorial staff make me wonder if your judgments about Governor Palin are more about ensuring the election of a Democrat candidate with significant flaws, than genuine concern for Governor Palin or her family. You should try being as critical about the quality of journalism the Post is putting out, particularly its general lack of balance.
Frankly, I was surprised by Governor Palin's selection. But after listening to her and understanding what she has accomplished in her life, I'm pretty excited about the opportunity to have an executive in place that is more representative of middle America.
Good Luck,
Paul
Drayden, MD

Posted by: Paul | September 2, 2008 7:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As an undecided voter this does not feel like a conversation from Ms. Quinn.More like her pontificating

Please elevate the debate. I used to expect better out of the Washington Post.

I am truly disappointed

Posted by: A conversation on religion? | September 2, 2008 7:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, I'm afraid you ruined the rest of your commentary when you opened with the fact that the Republican pick for Vice President has made you "angry." I'll bet it did make you angry -- you and all the other slimy so-called journalists who would like nothing more than to turn this country into another bastion of socialism with your biased reporting and undying affection for anyone that supports your agenda. If you had character, that anger would instead be respect for the superior party that has out-smarted your poor misguided candidates and that will lead this country proudly through the dangerous and trying times you write of.

Posted by: R. Thompson | September 2, 2008 7:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your column is an insult to my Mom, my Sisters, my Wife and my Daughter. Is it possible for you and other liberals to put your prejudice of Conservatives on hold for one moment and applaud this bright lady from Alaska for all that she has achieved.

What was the last actual job you held Ms. Quinn? Anyone can write an opinion piece.

When was the last PTA meeting you took the time to attend?

How can you insult this woman, her family, her values?

Shame on you.

Posted by: Jim | September 2, 2008 7:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your liberal bias is entertaining. If she was a single mother, and a democrat, you would be supporting her 100%. P.S. I do not think that you are religous. Your drivel is like reading a gourmet food column written by someone who eats out at Dennys on a weekly basis.

Posted by: Bill Stead | September 2, 2008 7:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My only comment: Americans should probably stop referring to their president as "leader of the Free World."

I happen to live in the Free World (outside the bubble of the US) and I would suggest that stopped being true some time ago.

Posted by: tom s | September 2, 2008 7:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I love how McCain had 4 bouts with deadly cancer...mmmm... wouldn't that make him dead? They act as if he is on his deathbed already.

Posted by: Rachel | September 2, 2008 7:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Another evil woman, Co-anchor of a news network is equivalent to being the Vice President of the United States.....A hanger on comparing herself to an accomplished woman.

Posted by: Craig | September 2, 2008 7:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are almost catching almost as much hell as I am Sally and looking better doing it. They get over it for all the right reasons. They are not using Irish diplomacy though, so you won't have to look forward to the trip. Keep raising hell and they'll keep wondering what you are up to. Don't get too popular, it has plenty of snares and little value. Good luck!

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 2, 2008 7:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, please do not act as you know evangalicals or Catholics. They are just fine with this as they are very compassionate and forgiving in this areas of pregnancy. What is hard to swallow for the pro-life party that a child is not going to kill her own child? For goodness sakes, they are the ones who create pregnancy centers to support teenagers who need assistance with an unplanned pregnancy. Moreover, JFK had little children in the White House and he had to deal with a wife of child bearing age who had one stillborn and one miscarriage. I am sure there was much in family issues that JFK had to deal with.

Posted by: Palin Supporter | September 2, 2008 7:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are almost catching almost as much hell as I am Sally and looking better doing it. They get over it for all the right reasons. They are not using Irish diplomacy though, so you won't have to look forward to the trip. Keep raising hell and they'll keep wondering what you are up to. Don't get too popular, it has plenty of snares and little value. Good luck!

Posted by: Mr. Challenger | September 2, 2008 7:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Again, just like the Baltimore So called writer, you are just not getting it. She is the most qualified on both tickets and a great pick for the Republican party. Once McCain/Palin get elected in November and allow you to continue writing this mess, you will change your tune.

Posted by: Cort | September 2, 2008 7:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,

As your biography suggests, you are definitely a "Washington DC Insider" who is completely out-of-touch with Middle America. To somehow compare yourself anchoring a news program to someone being chosen Vice President of the United States indicates how you feel about your own self-importance. I think your inflated feelings of self further affect how you view, and write about, the Pallin Vice Presidential pick.

The media response to the Pallin pick would actually be quite laughable if it was not so offensive. It shows extreme arrogance for you (collective 'insiders') to bash this woman simply because you do not know her. Because someone did not grow up in Washington is actually a positive to most of America. When a Democratic Congress has approval ratings of 9%, a Republican president has approval ratings of 30%, and hundreds of papers are cutting staff because newspapers are not selling, it should probably indicate to you that you have been figured out. Your reality is not reality.

It would be refreshing to have a VP candidate who does not live in DC, who fights corrupt politics (unlike Obama and the Daly machine)instead of joining them, and who understands the battles of owning a business, running the PTA, etc.

Stop the madness. Just because you don't know her does not mean she is an ignorant boob. It might mean we finally have a real "outsider" who will not be afraid to miss cocktail parties and will be motivated to create change.

Posted by: Arrogance Emanates from Sally Quinn | September 2, 2008 7:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn says:
"This is no time to to play gender politics. The stakes are too high."

But it's ok to play racial politics, Ms. Quinn?

Dimos pick one of the most liberal Senators in the Senate, one with no accomplishments, one who attended a racist church for 20 years, etc. etc. etc.

Ask yourself, Quinn, is Obama the best qualified in the Dimocratic Party to run for President?

Posted by: zqll | September 2, 2008 7:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is expressing "shock" and "anger" along with others in the liberal news flock over McCain's vp pick. It is really a reaction based on fear, because now your little darling Obama has been outsmarted and may not have a chance at the white house. Now we see the liberal media in its true colors: un-objective, bias, ignorant, uneducated, untalented, and not interested in truth at all.

Posted by: Ron Sharp | September 2, 2008 6:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I couldn't agree more. I was baffled by the choice McCain made. I was a staunch Hilary supporter and was on the fence as to whom I would support...when I heard the McCain choice of Palin I was insulted. The calculation that Palin is on the same plain as Hilary is an insult. A young woman who obviously has place career over family in a very zealous manner is not my idea of a vice president. Having little Washington experience frightens me since her office is a heart beat away from being the President of a huge powerful nation. What qualifications does she have to be THE leader. How much understanding does she have on foreign policy, the poor, health care, jobs, education, gay rights,for that matter main stream America. MINIMAL Experience. I reluctantly have decided to vote for Obama.

Posted by: janet | September 2, 2008 6:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

POOR SALLY. A feminist journalist just trying to protect Momma Palin and children and the USA from themselves - all in one byline. Mrs. Palin has been married for 20 years to a man that seems to have allowed his special bride to continue grow to with their family to her full potential with his full support. WOW - Is that news to so many women in America!? I would think that her success would be lifted up and praiseworthy by all the down troddened married and single mom journalists of our great country. Why, as Sally bemoans, should an American mom wait until she is older to become involved with politics?? I wasn't aware that was a stipulation prior to becoming an activist. I don't see that when viewing the ages of the demonostrators at both political conventions. 3 CHEERS for women who commit to take action and can lead families and men and politicians.

Posted by: Wife Supporter | September 2, 2008 6:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am TOTALLY supportive of Mrs Palin. As a Jewess in the US, may I remind everyone that America wasn’t won with a registerd gun? And that criminals are stopped by FIREARMS, not by talk? That is why all REAL Americans put our 2nd Amendment FIRST!!

Posted by: Wendy Weinbaum | September 2, 2008 6:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well- You have exposed yourself as being sexist rather than pro-woman. Obviously if this accomplished woman were a liberal you would love her. But, since she is conservative, you loathe her and go on a sexist rant. My wife, mother, sister, and daughter who are a business owner, a student, a stay at home mom, and a teacher all love the selection of Sarah Palin and are excited at the prospect of having a female rise to this level. They run the gamut from Pro-Choice to Pro-life and moderate to conservative. They are all incensed at the way Governor Palin is being treated. Let the backlash begin. I personally just think you have shown yourself to have little to no credibility.

Posted by: Tom | September 2, 2008 6:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

To question Sarah Palin's qualities as a mother because her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant is repugnant. It is also the depth of irresponsible journalism. You should be ashamed.

Posted by: Dan Kennedy | September 2, 2008 6:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palins got all you libs running scared. HAHA. Dont worry when Obama gets crushed in the election you can write about how Americans are all a bunch of racists for 4 years.

Posted by: DK | September 2, 2008 6:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sorry, Sally that McCain didn't pick you! What an ego. All I can say, is you (all the main stream media types) must be terrified at Palin's pick, since you're all taking your pot shots. McCain is on his way to victory, and this lady is going to point him in the right direction. They are the true ticket of reform!
(Ever heard of any time, ever, that Obama took on his party? Nope.)

Posted by: spk2moi | September 2, 2008 6:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am TOTALLY supportive of Mrs Palin. As a Jewess in the US, may I remind everyone that America wasn’t won with a registerd gun? And that criminals are stopped by FIREARMS, not by talk? That is why all REAL Americans put our 2nd Amendment FIRST!!

Posted by: Wendy Weinbaum | September 2, 2008 6:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sorry Sally that McCain didn't pick you! What an ego. All I can say, is you (all the main stream media types) must be terrified at Palin's pick, since you're all taking your pot shots. McCain is on his way to victory, and this lady is going to point him in the right direction. They are the true ticket of reform!
(Ever heard of any time, ever, that Obama took on his party? Nope.)

Posted by: spk2moi | September 2, 2008 6:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is more qualified to be President than Obama, and all the smears from the radical left/Obama campaign/media won't change that

Posted by: hot dog | September 2, 2008 6:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sorry Sally that McCain didn't pick you! What an ego. All I can say, is you (all the main stream media types) must be terrified at Palin's pick, since you're all taking your pot shots. McCain is on his way to victory, and this lady is going to point him in the right direction. They are the true ticket of reform!
(Ever heard of any time, ever, that Obama took on his party? Nope.)

Posted by: spk2moi | September 2, 2008 6:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment


It's interesting you know the thoughts and intents of the heart - especially conservative hearts.

Posted by: Don Mathis | September 2, 2008 6:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

what liberals fail to understand is that family values means that we preserve and protect human life ,in particular the unborn.this young girl and boy made a mistake in judgement and even though it will be diffecult they chose to protect their child.God bless sarah and her family.

Posted by: stevo | September 2, 2008 6:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn: I am outraged by your article. As a woman you should be supportive of Ms. Palin's decision to be VP. Do we ask Barack Obama about the care of his two children? If he wins, his wife Michele will have a very demanding role of First Lady. In fact, with all the campaigning she has been doing for him, she hardly is with her small children. I beleive this is a private family matter, and that we should not judge or attack Sara Palin.

Posted by: Michele Brander | September 2, 2008 6:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Let there be No mistake. The Left would take this 17 girl out back and shoot her in the back of the head in the blink of an eye if they thought it would help them win the election, and they thought they could get away with it.

That is the honest truth of the matter and don’t ever forget it. This people are so power hungry they will do ANYTHING and ALL things to get power. Right and wrong matters nothing to them, only their own egos do.

Posted by: Steve | September 2, 2008 6:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm a lifelong Democrat that has always voted Democrat and was raised a Democrat by my parents who were Democrats, but now I'm voting for McCain/Palin.

THERE.....maybe that will counter all the fake posters on here saying they've "always voted Republican but now are in love with BO". What a bunch of horsepucky. Do you imposters not realize we see right through your lies? Get a life.

Posted by: TexasTwister | September 2, 2008 6:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, your comments are a disgrace to working mothers everywhere.

Posted by: Margaret Billings | September 2, 2008 6:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Clearly Sally's only faith is with Godless, Socialist Pol's that come to her parties or that she Lewinski's so she can pretend she's the puppeteer pulling all the strings behind the scenes while not responsible for all the failures of said policies.

Posted by: Sally's Faith | September 2, 2008 6:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, What a pitiful article.

Posted by: Ralph | September 2, 2008 6:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You cannot be a mother by name only. A 'mother's is someone who is THERE for her children, morning, noon and night. Sarah Palin is not working a PT job at the local Wal-Mart. She is going to be gone on the campaign trail, she will be traveling through and around the country, and she will meeting with heads of state, if GOD FORBID, she becomes V.P. Who is breastfeeding her baby? The husband??? Who is burping him, holding him, singing to him, putting him to bed, bathing him? Hubbie? Or hired help? Or maybe she will just get that 17 y/o young mother to help with her baby, too! What a travesty for women! What a shameful scene for the so-called 'family values' crowd who has now circled wagons around her because they are so desperate to win the presidency with a no-brainer war hawk like McCain. So what's the big deal about the babies in her family? Doesn't she also have a 4/yo? As a woman I find her actions deplorable. She is NO MOTHER! It takes more than giving birth to be a real mother..it means sacrificing your own personal needs and desires for the sake of your children. Frankly, she disgusts me. But I have even greater disgust for the odious McCain who clearly doesn't even know who she is! What a FARCE!

Posted by: anniemargret | September 2, 2008 6:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is a smart, tough, accomplished woman who made it on her own and not on the coat tails of her husband. I'm confident she'll withstand the withering attacks from the left and hope that the vile criticism hurled her way will motivate voters to give McCain/Palin a landslide victory in November.

I have many friends on the right and the left of the political spectrum and I feel compelled to say that those on the left, overall, show more prejudice, intolerance, disdain and downright mean spiritedness than my right of center friends.

Posted by: stella e | September 2, 2008 6:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

You said "John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman and one who appealed to the Republican's conservative evangelical base." That makes about as much sense as saying Barak Obama chose a running mate simply because he was an older man with experience. If McCain's choice is cynical then Obama's is equally so. Should old men with experience be insulted? People are what they are and that is why they are chosen.

So my question to you is if Obama had picked Clinton would you feel just as used? What if he picked another woman? Are you upset he picked no woman at all? Or do you view only view Republican motives as cynical and manipulative?

Posted by: Bob | September 2, 2008 6:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Blow-back?

Karma?

Boomerang?

This is PRICELESS!

Good thing WaPo doesn't sell tickets or the angry mob would be rattling the fillings out of managements head trying to get their money back about now!

Isolate yourself some more with some lefty friends and pretend this didn't happen Sally - you'll feel better and then shockingly lose another election.

SQ "How it happen? I don't know anyone who voted for McCain." - come on you can say it.

Posted by: Whats the word? | September 2, 2008 6:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

awww whats wrong Sally? you upset that she isnt a complete dog like you?

Posted by: marcus | September 2, 2008 6:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

First, so much for your pretention to be a commentator "on Faith." We now know you to be a far-left liberal shill for the Obama campaign. I think I see why you were an immediate failure as a TV news anchor.

I was actually considering voting for Obama when I first heard his message of "No more politics as usual. No more partisanship - we will reach across the aisle, forming one America for Democrats, Republicans, whites, blacks, men and women, young and old."

Then I did some research and followed his campaign, and found out nothing could be further from the truth. His entire campaign has been about attacking Pres. Bush and demeaning the job our brave troops have done overseas. He has one of the most far-left voting records in Congress, along with Sen. Biden, a known and proven liar and plagiarist.

Sen. McCain on the other hand has always been known to ACTUALLY reach across the aisle and so is disrespected by most conservatives. And now he has selected a woman who is a known for ACTUALLY reforming politics, starting with her own party.

She has more experience than Obama, yet you consider him qualified to be president but she is not qualified to be VP?

Why don't you just move to MoveOn.Org with the other socialists and spew the far-left kool-aid. You certainly don't know much about faith, so why not just come out of the closet and admit it?

Sarah Palin is the most refreshing candidate that America has seen in a generation, and she will win millions of Independents and swing-voters, and you are petrified of that result. You should be... America is not quite ready to become Socialist yet.

Posted by: IndependentVoter | September 2, 2008 6:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It strikes me as hard to believe that the Republicans ignore the fact that McCain passed over tremendously talented and politically astute men and women who could be characterized as change agents. Why not question this decision? I don't get it. Are we so much into popular culture that a babe is better than a thinking candidate would be? Why is an education and analytical thinking so disdained? Do we aspire to be less than we can be? Is there some comfort in elevating an unwed mother to be something admirable rather than someone who has made a mistake and must face a difficult pathway? What is worng here? Yes, be sympathic and caring. But recognize this for what it is: A mistake! After reading more about the father, Levi Johnston, he may not be quite as excited about fatherhood as hoped. What will he be sacrificing?

Posted by: Patryot | September 2, 2008 6:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I assume your feelings are the same regarding Nancy Pelosi and her children.

She has more elected hours than BHO...Does that count?

Posted by: Sparky | September 2, 2008 6:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"It is a choice made to try to win an election. It is a political gimmick. And it's very high risk. I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country."

Memo to Sally: HE'S TRYING TO WIN THE ELECTION! This stuff is so funny. You lefties are so upset about this you don't know whether to poop or go blind. The meltdown on your side is as stunning as it is funny!

And how could you find something "insulting" to the Republican party when you belong to the Democrat party?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008 6:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Funny how Obama kept jumping to mind at every complaint Quinn raised!

Of course he's got lots of stuff thats WAY WORSE - Communist, Hates America, Hates White people, treats his bro stuck in Africa like crap, hangs out and takes favors from felons. Buddies with unapologetic terrorists!

Hmm, are we voting to put Obama in prison?

Maybe we should. . .

Posted by: Thinking About It | September 2, 2008 6:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I always heard that Vice Presidents were good mainly for ONE thing. To go to funerals. Does it make any difference if it is a man or a woman?
Thank you for allowing me to express my feeling on the Gov. Palin discussion.

Posted by: Garry Wright | September 2, 2008 6:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

@ Quinn
Given that Palin has almost as much elected experience as Obama, and clearly more executive management experience, I'd like to know if you've also written about Obama's lack of experience to be Vice President (much less President).

Posted by: Carnack (the Curious) | September 2, 2008 6:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

With everything else being the same, if Palin were a Democrat chosen by another Democrat, this column would be fawning about 'a bold choice' and 'a first for women, especially working mothers', blah, blah, blah ad infinitum. You know the routine. But because Palin is Republican and does not fit the stereotypical leftist view of a strong working woman, she scares the crap out of you. So you unleash an grasping and ineffective attack on her. You are so blinded by your ideology that you can't see that Palin was a brilliant choice. Just watch and see. Pathetic articles like this one only emphasize the value of choosing Palin. So just keep on bashing a self-made woman who became governor of the most macho state in the union who also has five children, one of them a special needs child. See where that gets you.

Posted by: Dr. Dean | September 2, 2008 6:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn -
You can throw out the experience argument, Sarah Palin has more experience than the Democratic nominee for president! The fact that she is a woman and a mother should be a breath of fresh air. Are you not for women breaking through the glass ceiling? Are you saying every mother of young children or special needs children should not work until the kids are out of the house? Have you considered what that would do to the workforce? Your reference to Nancy Pelosi has no bearing on Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin has values Nancy Pelosi can't even comprehend. Sarah Palin puts the people first. Nancy Pelosis puts herself and her own liberal agenda first (i.e. the recent congressional recess she called for when the country was demanding a vote on drilling). As far as your own failings as anchor for the CBS morning show, they aren't comparable to Sarah Palin's. As far as we know, she has none. What she is dealing with — her infant son and oldest daughter — are hardly failings. These are problems a significant percentage of American households deal with everyday. And she's doing it honestly, openly, and with dignity regarding what most Democrats have little use for, the most vulnerable of human life.

Robert Ross
Pasadena, CA

Posted by: Robert Ross | September 2, 2008 6:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn,
I read your article and thought "Is this a joke?" If John McCain HADN"T chosen Gov. Palin for his running mate for the reasons you disparage her, you would have been angry and outraged! If he had said that he wouldn't pick her because he thought she would be distracted by her family, you would have been screaming about his sexism. You cleverly hide your arguments behind the words of one evangelical and what you presume conservative voters would think so that you don't sound like a walking double-standard. The problem is you can't, in your wildest dreams, know what we think. You don't know us. You don't come across us in your insular media world. You don't know that we relate to people like Gov. Palin. We know that we aren't perfect. We just actually have values we try to live up to. We know that life happens to us all. One of the those values is honesty. You should be honest and say that you hate Sen. McCain's choice because he may gain an advantage on your choice, Obama. Please stop sounding naive by pretending that candidates don't pick running mates which give them an advantage. Why wouldn't they? Anyway, if I buy your thin argument, why wouldn't a woman want to be used in this way? What is so horrible about a woman being vice president? I think your partisanship has prevented you from thinking clearly on this subject. Your argument is more demeaning to women than anything Sen. McCain has done by choosing a qualified, energetic, accomplished woman to hold a high-level position in this government. To you the sin is that woman is a Republican, and not your kind a woman.

Posted by: C. Gleason | September 2, 2008 6:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:42 PM
Incredible. Barack Obama snarls at the growing recognition that Governor Palin's executive experience --as governor and oil and gas commissioner as well as in local government--by noting that his experience running a campaign for 18 months is what makes him more qualified than Palin.

Let's see.

First of all, Obama is running for president not vice president.

Second, did he think we wouldn't notice that all the time he's been running for president, Governor Palin has been running Alaska?

Finally, Obama struts his management of 2,500 employees and a budget of $30 million-plus in July.

Alaksa's budget is more than 11 billion, and the state employs 15,000 people. (HT: Byron York via the New York Times.)

Palin wins the side-by-side easily, and of course Obama is running against McCan.

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 6:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin cant even get her own family to buy into her positions, so why should the American public?

Practice Abstinence Kids! Uh, Mom, Bristol disobeyed.

Abhor teen pregnancy! Uh, Mom, Bristol disobeyed.

Given the choice and based on her behavior thus far, something tells me Bristol wouldnt be going forward with this pregnancy if it were not for Mom pointing one of her shot guns at her and making the wedding plans.

Well lets not forget that MOM was pregnant BEFORE she got married, so I guess its a case of do as I say, not as I do!

Bottom line is this- back in Alaska out of the national spotlight this mess would be her personal business. You wanna run with the big boys and get on the big stage, all gloves are off.

Welcome to Washington, Madame!

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 2, 2008 6:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

awww whats wrong Sally? you upset that she isnt a complete dog like you?

Posted by: marcus | September 2, 2008 6:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I can't believe how much Sally Quinn's comments are a throw back to the old days. She thinks a woman can't be vice president, or president, because her daughter or infant may need her. Isn't this what we've been trying to intelligently demonstrate all these years: That women can make these decisions for themselves and they can choose to work or stay at home with their children?

Are not children and grandchildren a distraction to men as well, Sally?

Why is it that if a democrat is a woman her choices are okay even lauded, but if the woman is a republican she is held to a different standard and clearly not able to be a working mom let alone a candidate. Furthermore, why can't a republican woman be chosen as a vice presidental candidate because of her proven leadership qualifications rather that for the sexist comment, Quinn made, that she was only chosen because she IS a woman. Quinn's comment is off-base. My immediate thought upon hearing of Palin's selection was that it was a calculated strategy based on her age and leadership shown at the state level, not based on her sex. With all the mean and age-ist comments about McCain coming from democrats I was sure the age issue was the democrats' overriding hang up, not the sex of the VP candidate. Apparently, I was wrong and democrats can't conceive of having a Republican woman in this position. Alternatively, if Joe Leiberman had been selected we would have heard more of the same old democrat comments about there only being "rich old white men" on the republican ballot. What a double standard the democrats always show. "Black or women who are republican cannot be genuine. Only the democrats can have legitimate black or women candidates." No one can please these democrats.

Obama's lack of experience is still the overwhelming problem of the democrat ticket. Voting for him just because he's black or young is a recipe for disaster. Biden's lack of integrity leaves the potential VP un-ready and un-deserving of the potential post of president. But, of course, lack of integrity is part of the democrat platform: look at the personal values of Bill Clinton, Edward Kennedy both of whom received standing ovations at the convention.

Just as an aside: Republicans have chosen people for who they are and not how they fit into fixed stereotypes much more consistently and earlier than democrats: it was a Republican President, Ronald Reagan, that brought us the first woman supreme court justice, Margaret Chase Smith was the first woman nominated for president of the United States by the Republican National Party, Jeannette Rankin, a Republican, was the first woman in the United States to serve in Congress, and more.

Posted by: Madkor | September 2, 2008 6:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

MS. Quinn

On you comment how can she be a mother and VP. You are a misogynistic sexist pig! Why do you not ask Obama that one? How come it is only the woman's responsibility to raise the children?

Posted by: insulted | September 2, 2008 6:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

THe only difference in credibility, as defined by Quinn's commentary to be president between Obama and Gov. Palin is that one is a male without experience and the other is a female without experience.

So, neither are qualified by their experience, but according to feminist logic, better to support a male who will bow to matriarchy than vote for a female who respects men and fathers. Quinn, will not play gender politics with her vote if her vote would install a socio-fascist to impose "equal pay" for "equal job title". In the matriarchy, experience doesn't matter, only the force of law.

Posted by: Jon W. | September 2, 2008 6:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Poor, poor Sally. You sound so bitter that McCain DARED to choose someone outside of the Washington establishment. And just WHAT business is it of YOURS that Mrs. Palin's daughter is pregnant? The sheer desperation of you so-called "journalists" is transparent.

Posted by: Glenn Smith | September 2, 2008 6:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a moderate Republican I was leaning toward McCain but I do not understand this pick at all. There are plenty of strong Republican women who would have been far superior picks. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas has an outstanding record as U.S. Senator and is widely admired. She has demonstrated experience and none of the baggage that Palin carries.

Frankly, I am surprised at John McCain's lack of judgement! I am now planning to vote for Obama.

Posted by: Moderate Republican | September 2, 2008 6:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

For your article much could be said about you;
-Arrogant
-Elitist
-Arrogant journalist
-Insulting
-Lacking of any moral fiber
-Do as I say not as I do person.

....... I understand why you wrote this article; Because you wanted attention and we all now the media newsprint and tv will do anything for ratings and attention no matter who it hurts, especially a conservative and more especially a conservative woman. If she had no children, I am certain you would find something wrong with that too!

I just feel sorry for those in your life that will have to call you mother, wife, sister, grandmother. and/or aunt in the coming days! Think about how they feel knowing a family member said about another woman.

Posted by: James | September 2, 2008 6:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm not exactly sure why the posters here are so angry with you, Ms. Quinn. You are expressing an opinion which is valid. Disagreeing with you is one thing. Demeaning you with ugliness is something else. When I read the hate-filled right wing posters, I think that you are onto something. Me thinks they doth protest too much.

How ironic that McCain's mouthpiece was complaining on Today this morning about the horrors of the left wing blogs. If she had been paying attention, she would have known that the rumors were related to the baby that Bristol apparently substitute-mothers now with questions related to whether Bristol or her mother were really the biological mother. That's pretty awful. But without those blogs and posters, apparently Bristol's pregnacy was not going to be revealed. This leaves some of us to wonder what else has not been brought to light. Is the daughter's pregnancy our business? Absolutely. Once you make a decision to enter into the public spotlight, you waive your privacy. And no one is demeaning Birstol. It's her hypocritical mother who is troubling. Palin's conduct is very consistent with the Troopergate allegations. This is a controlling woman who finds it cool to lounge around on dead animals.

Listen: There were plenty of qualified Republican women that would have been favorable to the Hillary folks. This woman is the antithesis of Hillary. This was purely pandering to the religious right. I expect canonization any moment now.

Posted by: Patryot | September 2, 2008 6:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow - so I guess all that junk about Obama planning his second term was just a lot of hooey and you guys are scared, er really, really scared.

Also: It seems you forgot Obama's Mama was about the same age - but NO PROBLEM THERE Democrats Good - Republicans Bad.

Wow you are so deep. . . Like Jake Handy on an Acid trip.

You must of been edgamucated in one of dem ivy leag skools. . . duh, huh or watch alot of mtv.

Posted by: What happened to the 2nd O' term? | September 2, 2008 6:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Journalism like this explains why Sally Quinn couldn't cut it as an on-air morning news anchor for CBS.

Posted by: Pastor Ken | September 2, 2008 6:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Balanced, insightful and courageous words from an experienced mother with no apparent ideological axe to grind. In his haste to excite the right and embrace female voters McCain appears on the verge of unloosening a maelstrom of controversy which could easily in a 48-hour accelerated news cycle lead to the disengagement of this nervy arrangement.

Posted by: Dave Pomeroy | September 2, 2008 6:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Poor Sally. So deluded by her insular life as a liberal journalist. Too bad she can't get out more.

Posted by: Texas Pete | September 2, 2008 6:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is so yesterday. She expresses her concerns about Governor Palin being selected because she is a woman, and then turns around and is distressed that conservatives won't pick a woman. Sally get real.

Palin/Jindal for 2112

Posted by: cluelessinky | September 2, 2008 6:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I couldn't agree more with this article. Sarah Palin is the worst possible choice for the oldest ever President (I hope not) John McCain. McCain is 72 years old and has a history of cancer. Cancer killed all of my grandparents in their early 70's. If this happens to McCain what will be left with to fight a coming cold war with Russia; Sarah Palin a hockey mom with no foreign policy experience and a 4 month old child, a 5 year old child, and a 17 year old daughter who also has a new baby? I feel like I'm in the twilight zone with this whole Republican ticket! I'm voting Democrat for the first time in my life on Nov. 4th!

Posted by: howard | September 2, 2008 6:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Balanced, insightful and courageous words from an experienced mother with no apparent ideological axe to grind. In his haste to excite the right and embrace female voters McCain appears on the verge of unloosening a maelstrom of controversy which could easily in a 48-hour accelerated news cycle lead to the disengagement of this nervy arrangement.

Posted by: Dave Pomeroy | September 2, 2008 6:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Golly, asking men and women to submit themselves to their households (You left out the other part of that biblical quote). That IS disturbing. In the next conservative move maybe they'll ask these oppressed women to be vice president just to mess with them. Fortunately every liberal in the audience will scream "FEMALE!" at the top of their lungs, secure in the knowledge that the only reason someone would ask a woman to be vice president is because of her gender. It's always disappointing and insulting to assume the motives of the other side of the political spectrum, no?

Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008 6:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn's article fails to mention Obama's or Biden's physical problems. All Quinn seems to elaborate on is McCain's bout with cancer. I would much rather take my chances with a true war hero with years in the senate like McCain than someone like Obama that only has been a community organizer and in the senate for 144 days. There are just too many questions concerning Obama that the left doesn't seem to be able to answer. Just tell me what Obama's experience is and someone he has known for 20 years besides Jeremiah Wright or his wife Michelle. The left repeatedly attacks McCain and Palin for their own lack of knowledge of their own candidate. These are definitely dangerous times for the United States. When I read our enemies advertise in their newspapers that they want Obama to win and the left wing media doesn't have any concrete experience they can tell Obama has you bet as a woman I'll be voting for McCain and Palin. And by the way, where is the hundred million dollars that Obama and Bill Ayers were suppose to use for colleges in Chicago? That's just one of the 20 or so questions I have for Obama that the left media is hiding from the public or knows about it and is lying to the American people. Which is it? The left wing media is destroying the United States. The left cares nothing for human life. You know it took Obama 20 years to figure out his church preached DAMN America. Our enemies teach their children DAMN America too. Our enemies don't care if we are democrat, republican, man, woman or child, black or white, christian or jew. They want all Americans dead.

Posted by: debbie | September 2, 2008 6:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sorry, you are wrong and under no circumstances should Obama get elected to drag our country farther down the road of communism / socialism.

Posted by: Keith | September 2, 2008 6:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The only reason why you resent Sarah Palin is that blows out of the water your comfortable box of totalitarian identity politics. Only an atheist (or pagans like the Nazis) would consider not working on themselves and developing good character traits and immerse themselves in the slime of moral relativism.

Posted by: FF | September 2, 2008 6:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Bristol is well on her way to having at least 10 kids by the time she reaches 44. Will her husband work or will they go on welfare?

Posted by: writing opinion | September 2, 2008 6:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ok, this is the start of a New Low for the so called Press!!!

Spin, spin, spin - reverse 180 - whatever it takes for their guy!

We need FEMA to open up a bunch of RUBBER ROOMS for the press when Obamination looses!

It's going to be Keith Obermann 24/7 on all the networks - REALY it's not going to be safe around these people!

Posted by: New Low | September 2, 2008 6:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, You obviously hit a nerve and thank goodness you did!

If McCain and the Repubs wont vet their VP candidate, the intelligent American voters will.

This is almost comical. I feel like a kid on Christmas morning. McCain just gave the election to the Obamites!

McCain was strong armed into ignoring Leiberman and selecting an unexperienced individual who just happens to be a woman.

Palin is a woman, but in the words of another VP candidate, You Sara Palin are NO HILLARY CLINTON.

You cant nor will win this election simply because of your gender.

Dont insult me!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 5:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You say she can't be a good leader because she is a mother of young and special needs children? OMG, if you were a man and wrote this, you would be tagged as the biggest sexist in the world. If Obama had chosen a mother with young/special needs children, you would be proudly harking his choice as someone who is in touch with working moms, young people and the downtrodden.

I was ambivalent about McCain's choice of VP candidates until reading your article. It has proven the hypocritical nature of the left, particularly the liberal media.

Posted by: A. Mazed | September 2, 2008 5:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, Sally. So you think that when women are selected for candidacy that this only as token females and not based on their potential competency in office? Do you really think a woman must be the primary caretaker and can't serve as a mother and stateswoman with a husband who takes on the majority of the child care role? I honestly have some other concerns about this woman as VP, just as I do about all of the candidates (it's slim pickings this season). But I wanted to comment on your overt misogyny. For the record, I think Geraldine Ferraro had a lot of things going for her other than her gender. Bet you never thought you would here another woman telling YOU to pull your head out of the stone age!

Posted by: JE | September 2, 2008 5:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

you are so off base here. This woman has accomplished much in a so called mans world. You do nothing to applaud her accomplishments. It seems that you are going out of your way to denigrate Gov. Palin. Shame on you.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 5:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You should be ashamed of yourself. The media is conducting a full scale onslaught against Palin. Perhaps the media should ask some of these same questions of Obama and Biden. The double standard is appalling.

I have been aware of Palin for most of the year, and feel that she is a very fine pick for McCain and his personality. It appears to me that the Media and the Democrats are trying to destroy Palin because she is a woman and they feel that if she becomes Vice President that they will loose the notion that all women are Democrats.

The truth is there are fine women that are liberal and fine women that are conservative. The attempts to demonize Palin is unbecoming and shows the bias and hypocrisy present in the media.

Posted by: Uomo Del Ghiaccio | September 2, 2008 5:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"DISINSEMINATOR"

You say "Get your own house in order before trying to tackle the US's Problems." And that Palin has failed as a parent.

You forget 2 things, that the Palin house's personal problems are their own business, and that teenagers (juvenile humans that have not reached full maturity yet) have the tendency to think for themselves. By the age 17, parents can only do so much parenting, its up to the teens themselves to learn something from the years of teaching. It is a fault with Palin's daughter, not with Palin.

Also, by assuming that it is Palins responsibility to 'get her house in order' is assuming that it is a mothers job to resolve home issues. Do you hate women, or do you just not care about what they think? Perhaps you think women shouldn't be allowed outside of the kitchen?

Posted by: Anon. | September 2, 2008 5:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If this election about judgment, the choice of Sarah Pahin shows poor judgment on McCain’s part.

Any intelligent person knows when you choose to have unprotected sex at 43 you have a very high probability of having a child with Downs Syndrome. She used poor judgment not using birth control.

Would she use better judgment dealing with our economy?

Would she use better judgment dealing with our enemies?

I for one am not willing to take a chance on Pahin’s and McCain’s judgment.

Posted by: Kwaayesnama | September 2, 2008 5:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Of course McCain picked someone he felt would help him win the Presidency. So did Obama. He picked someone whose values reflect the party for whose nomination he is seeking. He also picked a gutsy maverick like himself who will take on the self interests in both parties.

She has more executive and foreign policy experience as No.2 than the Democratic party's No. 1, and she has the opportunity to grow under the tutelage of John McCain. IF these are "trying times," isn't it better to have the more experienced and capable person at the top of the ticket?

And are you saying that Sarah, with older children to help, an involved husband, and a daughter who is marrying soon, will need to be involved with her children to the detriment of the country? Didn't I notice Obama's young children? Or is it alright to be traditional and nonfeminist when it suits you? You probably subscribe to Obama's dark statement that he would not want them to have to suffer for such a mistake. In other words, kill to rectify the mistake.

Let's get down to the difference in the parties. Democrats want to kill unwanted children, Republicans want to protect them. That's the basic issue, reflecting a relativistic value system versus a belief in fundamental moral laws.

Sarah Palin's selection will unite the Evangelicals, please the Catholics, appeal to women who admire real feminists and not just baby killers. The Republicans have my vote this year.

Posted by: freeagent | September 2, 2008 5:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn

To apply your logic Obama's choice of an exprienced old "blue coller" white guy is for what?

Posted by: ME | September 2, 2008 5:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It comes back to choices. Sarah Palin is choosing to try to be VP, mom and Grandmom, all at the same time. She can make this choice, because she is financially secure, her husband appears to be willing to be the primary care provider, and he has a job that has allowed him a generous leave of absence.

Many other women lack these supportive resources, and end up feeling like they have no options that are not tragic.

The real question is, as governor what has she done, and as VP what would she do, to ensure that women who lack the resources she has, have less tragic options than abortion available to them?

Posted by: NotSoGreatScot | September 2, 2008 5:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm a conservative Republican and have to admit Sarah Palin has immediate family concerns. I was thrilled to first read about her until I got to the part about having a newborn - and with Downs Syndrome to boot. That and the fact that her youngest daughter is 7. I suppose one can argue her 17 year old daughter is almost an adult. It's psychologically different for a mother than it is for a father both individually and in the family - and she's got a young family.
Nonetheless, I'll vote for McCain/Palin. She'd better realize now that in this job, family can't come first. I hope she's superwoman. Sarah Palin had better be worth it.

Posted by: kris | September 2, 2008 5:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"A mother's role is different from a father's."

Funny, we've not heard that from a Post columnist in many decades. What makes it relevant now, sweetheart?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 5:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There's a basic difference between your life's experiences and Sarah Palin's. You got where you are through your connectione, going to the right schools, marrying the boss, etc. Sarah Palin got where she is through hard work and fortitude.

That's why she is a success and you failed.

Posted by: BWC | September 2, 2008 5:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally

How's the Post's circulation, I am guessing that you actually think that what you write people read? Newspapers are going the way of the buggy whip, and it's in large part do to your objectivity, oh, I am sorry, you don't have any objectivity. Please keep up the good work, your opinions are always well known, so your readers don't have to waste their time reading them, will the last person at the Post please turn out the lights,

Posted by: Don | September 2, 2008 5:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Typical conservatives, changing their views on teenage pregnancy and sex before marriage on a case by case basis. And I suppose Palin's daughter's baby is a blessing while some inner-city 16-year-old's baby is a shame?

Posted by: Josh | September 2, 2008 5:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

You made it even more clear for me. I now have even higher respect for Palin for accomplishing all this while raising 5 kids and for saying "yes" to the call of duty for her country despite her family's needs. Let's face it, as Rep. #2, she is better qualified than the Dem.s'#1. Thanks for sharing your own personal failures and what "you" would do if offered the VP job. If she can figure out how be good governor in a few months, she can figure out how to be a good president if needed. She has the brains, charisma and the guts to succeed. Obama picked a Washington insider career politician, I can understand the panic at your place of work that McCain picked a real person.

Regards


Posted by: Eugene | September 2, 2008 5:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What no one is prepared for is hags like yourself. Is there any wonder why the print media is dying? Think about the things you wrote and then apply them to yourself 30 or 40 years ago.

Posted by: Rick | September 2, 2008 5:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am nearly wetting myself laughing at the right-wingers trying to justify the choice of Palin by McSame.

How can any of you actually try to spin a 17-year-old getting pregnant as a good thing, or that this somehow represents anything other than a colossal failure of parenting by the Palins?

Sarah: get your own house in order before trying to tackle the US's problems.

Posted by: Disinseminator | September 2, 2008 5:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I heard Sally Quinn interviewed on CNN today about this editorial. She said that "evangelical women are expected to be stay at home moms," and sited the fact that certain Southern Baptist churches do not allow women to be ministers. I belong to a Christian denomination where many of the pastors are women. Why is it that liberal women are only supportive of liberal women?

Posted by: Nancy Brown | September 2, 2008 5:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

Your first sentence premise is as silly and hypocritical as it is revealing– only because she is a woman that appeals to (a) base?

How did you get your job and your 4th Estate bully pulpit? Did you earn someone's confidence and if so at what cost? (tsk tsk).

Governor Palin was elected, and she enjoys strong bipartisan support in Alaska, where she proved that one can Govern and clean house when necessary- even against a cynical and corrupt backdrop.

Meanwhile, why did you and your like-minded media ilk select Obama? He is likable, but was he the best man or woman for the job?

Posted by: Kirk Taber | September 2, 2008 5:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maybe Sally Quinn and Nasty P. (Ms Stretchy-Face Speaker) can go on tour and tell people who ACTUALLY HAVE SOME FAITH what it actually means - you know like 180 degs off - or as we like to call it - COMPLETELY WRONG.

Having this woman write so much BS on a faith page is as outlandish as nasty, NABALA Nancy telling us matter of factly that the church supports abortion - yeah like only she knew about it - big debate about abortion inside the church!!!!

They are not just Left Wing Loonies they are Evil.

Posted by: Heres an Idea | September 2, 2008 5:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?"

Agreed that Obama and Palin don't have much experience. However, I would much rather have an inexperienced Vice President than an inexperienced President. The Dem ticket is backward - shouldn't Biden be the Pres nominee and Barack the VP nominee?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 5:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a yellowdog Democrat and an ardent Hillary supporter I find this endless Palin speculation both insulting and time-wasting. There are only two facts that matter here: 1) She is without doubt the least experienced candidate on the national stage in my lifetime. She has LESS experience than George W. Bush had when he was elected to national office. And look what an unmitigated disaster that has been. (And now McCain wants to give us at least four more years of THAT!) That has been precisely my concern about Obama all along. 2) With all the doctors, nurses, nannies, superdomos, and subordinates available to national politicians, Palin's children certainly won't go without support and supervision. That is a non-issue. The real issue here is what a Palin vice presidency might do to my children (or grandchildren). I (and they) don't want or need any further destruction of the public education system, any meddling with the balance of church versus state, or any decision-making that tilts to bible belief over scientific analysis. Palin is not responsible for her daughter's decisions - good, bad or otherwise. But she must be held accountable for her own beliefs and approaches to decision-making that will affect the rest of us. And there she is clearly lacking based on the prima facie evidence already on the record. McCain's choice was hardly "cynical;" it was political. That's how the game is played because the voters fail to demand more (and better). But the polls have shown - and are now showing - that just maybe the old politics isn't going to be enough this time: that the voters are ready for someone who really thinks about problems and systems and has the vision to address them in a new way. It happened with JFK; it may very well happen with BHO. And If so, the lightly experienced BHO will have behind him a highly experienced vice president of the same caliber of LBJ that Kennedy had if it becomes necessary for the vice president to carry on. All we need now is the vote. Am I entirely happy with my choices? Not entirely. But at least this time I have a clear one.

Posted by: theyelladawg | September 2, 2008 5:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

this has got to be a joke. what happened to fair journalism. sally quinn should be ashamed of herself. To compare her failed stint at CBS as a national news anchor to the abililty to be vice president from govenor is a bitter comparrison because of her failure. i swear she is looking for every reason to NOT vote for her. Hey does sally have any kids..if so shouldnt she leave her position and raise her kids? the obvious answer no. Her husband raises the kids and she works. Get you head out of the ground, thats more status quo than you would care to admit im sure, but seriously, why dont you just stick to journalism..if you can.

Posted by: Steve Henager | September 2, 2008 5:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

1. You must be kidding
2. You are making a joke
3. You make far too much money for writing this

I vote for #3.

Posted by: URDRWHO | September 2, 2008 5:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Do you really believe what you are saying lady? Obama's own mother was 17 when she got pregnant and she wasn't married, not to mention the fact he was some african guy. And what about Obama's own brother who lives in some mud hut on $12 a year. What about Obama's racist views on white people and his ties to terrorism. What about Michelle Obama's upper lip. What about that.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 5:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am astounded,shocked,astonished,confounded,
flabbergasted and down right gob-smacked to hear someone who is supposed to have a modicome of compassion take such a selfish venal position on one young Bristol Palin who is courgeously and with the help of her family (certainly not the media) going to step up to the plate and shoulder her responsibilities as a young mother and soon to be wife. Why do you insist on comparing yourself to Sarah Palin. You have absolutely nothing in common save that you are a woman. I think. I raised four children who are just a year apart in ages while running a small company, going to university and launching my career as a successful artist. I have four great self-sufficient and enthusiastic kids now completely launched. I relate to Saah Palin and know that the newest baby will be loved and cared for by THE ENTIRE FAMILY. You see, a failed net-work broadcaster has, again I'll say it...ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in common with Sarah Palin. While pregnant, she stickhandled through one of the most advantageous energy deals for the nation. Bet you don't even know what that is. Google TransCanada pipeline and gulp. You have written a minor column which is rarely read and have the audacity think you are qualified to draw comparisons between your own life and that of the next VP of the USA Sarah Palin. Let me be the first to advise you. You are SO not in her league. And may I say, you are soooo not in my league.

Posted by: Kate McLean | September 2, 2008 5:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The tongue is such a wicked instrument, shown here with the pen. Many assumptions made, where is your evidence of why she is the choice of the party? "Token Evangical", how just is this?

Posted by: mikee | September 2, 2008 5:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally is right, Mrs. Palin just isn't ready to be VP of this regressing nation.

Posted by: Cheeba Loins | September 2, 2008 5:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn, I am a "family values voter" and I fully support Sarah Palin for VP. Family Values Voters are just that - they support families and family members make mistakes. Its not whether or not one makes a mistake its how they deal with them, and voters like us don't judge those people, we support them and hope they make better choices in the future.

It is liberal "moderate" or "religious" holy than thou people like you who are intolerant and narrow minded. On one hand I feel sorry for Mrs. Palin's daughter but on the other I admire her for her strength in having to put up with your ilk. If she can get through this she will have a much better formed character than you seem to have.

Your column is just another of many examples of why I have stopped reading the Washington Post. Furthermore your column and ones like it are the reason why the paper's circulation is down year to year. Readers are fed up with your baloney.

Posted by: Ross W | September 2, 2008 5:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I've lost my faith in getting facts that are important to me and my family's life in the media. This article reads like the National Enguirer. Leave the family life out of politics. We Americans really want to read what she does as a governor and politician and not as a mother and wife. Her views on health care, social security, Iraq, terrorism, etc. I am a 59 year old white woman.
Don't think I am wrong.
Please go back to the old days when news and information were news and information.

Posted by: Janet | September 2, 2008 5:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ewe-yuck!

What orifice did Ms Quinn spew this filthy bile out of?

Posted by: Oh My Gosh!!!! | September 2, 2008 5:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are an out of touch, intellectual bigot if you have a sense of "anger" about this. Anger? At whom? McCain? Because he chose someone "REAL"? For the love of ... ugh!

If this were a man would you be asking the same thing?

She wasn't picked because she was a woman only, she's a governor with STRONG conservative values.
If it was to woo Hillary voters, why did it energize the hard right base?

Should we judge EVERYONE based on the actions of their children?

You are weak, and I'm a independant liberal. No wonder Obama is leading in the poles when a so-called "moderate" like yourself has to drag a person's gender into the debate. Wow.

Posted by: Chris Norman | September 2, 2008 5:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well, Sally Quinn, you're showing YOUR true stripes, aren't you? Give us a break, we know YOU are the slanted, cynical one. Be honest with yourself and your readers and, perhaps, we'll respect the MSM again.

Posted by: Observation | September 2, 2008 5:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn:

I am also the mother of a 40 year old special needs daughter plus two younger children. I did not go back to work full time until my youngest was 6. Subsequently, I went to law school while the youngest were in college.

I do not believe that Palin's daughter's pregnancy is off limits and here's why. Although Palin does not make any claim that her daughter is declining an abortion because they are anti-choice, her surrogates are praising Palin and her daughter and actually elevating the situation to some kind of positive badge of success. Palin is opposed not only to abortion, but she is opposed to contraception and pre-marital sex. This is something that the right wing finds attractive. But there's no acknowledgment of the results of turning a blind eye and the resulting teenage pregnancy. With the emergency marriage looming on the horizon, only with a great deal of support can Palin's daughter and grandchild expect a positive outcome.

Instead, Palin has chosen her own ambition over her family. This is totally okay with me but is at odds with her religious base. I see Palin as self-absorbed and unable to step back and take a look at her family. Sure, none of them want to deny her a chance at national office. But a person true to their faith would be more concerned about the issues that need her attention more imperatively: The new Down Syndrome son and the expected grandchild. It's her choice. In this case I see it as selfish. She dispensible as a candidate and indispensible as a mother!

Posted by: Patryot | September 2, 2008 5:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, imagine a politician doing something to get elected! Sally, this response is petty. What few valid points you raise are lost by the sheer pettiness of it all. You can surely do better than this!

Posted by: Mark Brooks | September 2, 2008 5:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So, in Ms. Quinn's calculation, Obama's lack of experience is a-OK although he's running for President; Palin's "lack of experience" (she was running a city when he was a Get-Out-The-Vote organizer) as vice-presidential candidate is a deal-breaker.

And to top it off, being offered a morning anchor position is "similar" to being offered the Vice-Presidency of the United States of America.

Pardon me, I have to go hit snooze on my "hypocrite alarm."

Posted by: Bull Moose | September 2, 2008 5:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

b

Posted by: a | September 2, 2008 5:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My mother started college when I started the first grade. She continued her education over the years and almost has a PhD. She was a role model. But her priorities never blurred.

Any parent - father or mother - with a down syndrome newborn (5 months) and a pregnant teenage daughter, muchless three other children, should carefully consider a major career "promotion". Parenting should be the first priority.

Before being elected Governor, Palin said her husband was going to stay home with the kids. According to an article I read, she had not discussed that with him, and he does in fact work.

The conscious choice to have five children is a conscious choice to put one's children first until they are older. Palin didn't do so. And for that, she does not have my respect.

Palin's situation does not involve the choice of losing one's job versus taking another. This is a personal priority - raw ambition. The 'timing' is off, and taking McCain's bait was a decision to put herself before that of her family. Yes, it's a one-in-a-million and once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. But that's jut too bad, Sarah. You made your choice when you kept having children. I bet you don't support the use of birth control, and you want to take that right away for American women.

This is not about women's rights. It's about children's rights. Come on Sarah, do the right thing. You have two choices:
1. Put your children first; turn down the VP offer and have your hubby play Mr. Mom, or
2. Put your children up for adoption.

Posted by: Jana | September 2, 2008 5:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

News Flash

Hey Silly Sally, your not up to the job you have now either!

Posted by: You Writing Stinks Too | September 2, 2008 5:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, Mrs Palin must be a real threat if Sally is writing such derogatory and ignorant comments about her. Sally obviously doesn't have any understanding of how "evangelicals" think based on her diatribe. Out of the four individuals that are being identified as potential Presidents or VP's, the one that I would pick to lead the country would be Sarah Palin! She exhibits all the qualities of a LEADER. This includes but is not limited to conservative fiscal policies (like saying no to the "Bridge to Nowhere") eliminating corruption (even in her own party--Ted Stevens and previous Governor)and the common sense to understand that life begins at conception.

As far as I know she doesn't go to a racist, hate mongering church or hang out with convicted criminals (Resko) and anti-establishment radicals (Ayres). She has demonstrated that she can not only run a small town as Mayor but an entire state with an approval rating above 80%! She sounds pretty solid to me.

It's got to be difficult for far "lefties" to understand that the typical US citizen doesn't want socialism, redistribution of wealth, unions or more government programs! We just want the government to stay out of our way and let us keep the buck that we earned.

Posted by: Common Sense Ed | September 2, 2008 5:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I cannot read this article, it is distasteful and inexcusably biased, especially for a media source (something that i know is inevitable, but i feel compelled to point it out).

Sarah Palin's DAUGHTER and her daughters personal decisions should not influence how anyone votes for the Republican Ticket. Not Every politician can be perfect, and Palin is no exception: Sure, she'll lose a few Family Values voters, but she'll gain support from the Pro-Life people. Its unrealistic to expect she'll gain support from every voting group in existance.

As for the clear Feminism regarding Palins selection as running mate, you do not give enough credit to McCains intelligence by assuming he made an uninformed and political choice. I expect journalists (even when writing an opinion article) to do a little research regarding the choice. By gathering insufficient data and drawing conclusions based on that poor data, you draw a picture of an Idiot-McCain picking Palin just because, not because she might actually be a good choice. Following that logic, if this Idiot-McCain were to NOT select palin, Feminists such as yourself would probably be equally outraged for NOT selecting her "just because she's a woman".

Posted by: Anon. | September 2, 2008 5:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you just don't get mainstream religious conservatives. The way her family has handled both her pregnancy and that of her daughters shows that they are real people, making tough decisions.

You should be embarrassed that you don't give the Obama campaign the same scrutiny.

I have heard no one ask how Obama chose an admitted plagiarist to be his running mate! You are really unbelievable.

Another example is the GLARING irony of Obama's favorite Bible verse: "Whatever you have done unto the least of these, my brothers, you have done unto me, " when Obama's own brother lives on 12 dollars a day. This is a man who thinks he can spend your money better than you can, when he can't even even send his brother $100.

You also don't seem to understand the difference in executive experience and campaign experience. Barack Obama has accomplished virtually nothing in his brief legislative career, and he's running for president, not Vice President! My God, have you ever listened to the man when he's off teleprompter?

Posted by: Scott Hardin, Atlanta | September 2, 2008 5:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn didn't know Alaska was in the Union. She doesn't care about anything west of Tysons Corner.

Posted by: grunk | September 2, 2008 5:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Columns such as this one show why journalism, once a respected profession, have degraded to the point that they are found in today. You and your sort have fettered away the public trust and are now viewed with contempt and suspecion. Much in the way that you and your sort portray others. What goes around surely comes around in time.

Posted by: WTFO | September 2, 2008 5:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, another jibe from a jealous women at Palin. I guess she just isn't "Feminist" enough for you guys huh?

Women vote for women, and that is considered ok by feminists and thier ilk, but when the women running for office isn't a feminist, then suddenly it becomes wrong. Now it's just a gimmick, a fruad... I am simply amazed at the hypocrisy females have.

Posted by: Jesse | September 2, 2008 5:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is Sally serious? or is this a joke..??

I think Palin is a GREAT choice - based on her VALUES and EXPERIENCE.

Sally - you've been in DC too long....

Posted by: Brian | September 2, 2008 5:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win an election. It is a political gimmick. And it's very high risk. I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country. "

"User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site."

Too bad you don't apply your comments policy to the actual article!

Posted by: Bob in Omaha | September 2, 2008 5:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

After reading your article I was “left” with a feeling of déjà vu. Back in the 1950’s that was the argument women used to hear from men when they applied for a job …I am a conservative with two beautiful little girls and would never dream of telling them that when they grow up, they will have to choose between having a profession or raising a family.I’m amazed at how backward your thought process is...Change you can believe in ? I hope not .

Posted by: wayne butler jr | September 2, 2008 5:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your review is a joke when it comes to discussing the Palin family. You focus solely on Sarah Palin. Not once do you give her husband any credit for fulfilling the roles of the mother in this family. Not once do you mention other family members that help support her family. Sure one of her daughters is a pregnant teenager. But, there are many teenagers that have been raised properly and have made mistakes. You can't be with your teenagers 24/7, but, it is most important that you are there when they need you and that you instill values in them to make good decisions. Sarah is clearly their for her daughter and appears to have at least instilled one value in her--don't kill babies because you made a mistake. And(oops,I almost forgot like you did in your article), her father is there to help out.

Posted by: Independent Voter sick of liberal press | September 2, 2008 5:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It might just be possible that Governor Palin has demonstrated extraordinary character, skill, and potential in her short political career.

In reviewing the criticism of her lack of experience, allow me to point out the difference between the job Senator Obama is running for and the job she is running for with some quotes on the vice-presidency:

...a "stepping stone to oblivion."
-Teddy Roosevelt

(of the vice-presidency)"...wasn't worth a warm pitcher of spit."
-VP Jack Garner

"I wouldn't want to trade a vote for a gavel, and I certainly wouldn't want to trade the active position of leadership of the greatest deliberative body in the world for the part-time job of presiding." -LBJ

On the whole, this article completely lacks intelligible political thought.

Posted by: Jared | September 2, 2008 5:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The press thinks your all a bunch of sheep - that they can pull a complete 180 on any issue whenever its suits a Democrat or hurts a Republican and we will somehow not notice it and just go along like good little sheep!

That may work for emotionally drunk libs like M Dowd and their ilk or the welfare, prison classes, Hollywood twits and mush brained MTVers who don't vote but NOT really anyone else.

They are going to reap a huge whirlwind with this attack on Palin and they will be stunned by the election results.

MSM " Yesterday American voters had a Temper tantrum at the poles."

Posted by: They Have No Idea | September 2, 2008 5:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey socialists: middle America is getting very angry.

Just a warning.

Posted by: Kal | September 2, 2008 5:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey "Reasonable":

We all have ethics, standards, goals by which we live our lives - call them whatever name you choose. It's hard enough sometimes to live up to one's own - the hardest thing I've learned from being a parent, is trying to instill your own values into someone else (your own child) and having them 'stick' because at some point they learn they have the freedom to make their own choices and set their own standards and then the parents' become secondary to each individual's own decisions. This is the most difficult thing about being a parent - you try to instill your values but at some point the child takes control and responsibility of his/ her own life.

You can't honestly say anyone is a poor parent because their child became pregnant at 17. Well, I guess lib's can - typically out of touch but it's far too common these days.

I don't know if Palin's a good parent or not. Honestly I don't know and couldn't possibly just read enough about her to make that decision. Can you say you can? Apparently Sally thinks so.

Posted by: patriot | September 2, 2008 5:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Married women have no business holding responsibities if they have children or grandchildren. i am a long time democrat, i have a hard time swallowing that crap.

Posted by: danny beano | September 2, 2008 5:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You wouldn't ask whether a man could handle his job due to his big family. How sexist.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 5:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

From the party of family values, we bring you an ill-tempered adulterous who calls his wife the c word and a woman with a 17 year old pregnant daughter who apparently missed several of abstinence classes that her mother so heavily supports.

From the anti-family values party, we bring you a happily married man with two bright and well spoken daughters and widower who was lucky enough to find a wed the second love of his life and raise fine children with her.


Posted by: BrooklynGirl | September 2, 2008 5:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree, I feel that Palin was picked because she is a woman and because of her purported religious views. Religious views she wants imposed on all of us via legislation and Supreme Court nominations. Her views on abortion and abstinence in and of themselves are not a problem, but when she advocates eliminating the choice for both for everyone else, she becomes a huge target. And, in light of these revelations, a walking example that abstinence doesn't work. And, by forcing her teenager daughter and paramour in to the national limelight, she is showing her terrible judgement as a parent.

Posted by: Jim | September 2, 2008 5:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Can I just say that I find there is an unbelievable lack of respect for other people's opinion in the US. There is best exposed on cable TV and even more effectively in the 'blogosphere'.

Sally Quinn has stated her opinion. But rather than respectfully reply saying 'that's well argued but I disagree because...', a large number of replies simply state their own ideology regardless of relevance, and often personally attack the writer.

This disrespect is alarming because it dehumanizes people by putting them into 'us' and 'them' camps rather than remembering that our differences are minor compared to what we share.

Finally, on the subject: I personally feel a great deal of sympathy for Bristol. It is clear from the tone of the Palin spokespeople that this was not a planned event, and now he pregnancy has become international intrigue. It does not seem very 'family-values' to be running for office with a small baby and a daughter soon to need support with her baby.

Posted by: Craig | September 2, 2008 5:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a pathetic anti feminist column. You should be embarrassed to call yourself a women.

Posted by: Kyle | September 2, 2008 5:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a pathetic anti feminist column. You should be embarrassed to call yourself a women.

Posted by: Kyle | September 2, 2008 5:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama -

Being a male child born to a Muslim father automatically makes him Muslim in Muslim eyes. Add to that the fact that he was raised Muslim and attended mosque up until his rearing was taken over by his Grandparents makes him doubly Muslim in Muslim eyes. Now comes the rub. If he was Muslim in Muslim eyes and he has renounced Islam then in Muslim eyes he is 'murtadd' that is apostate and it is then the duty of all practicing Muslims to denounce him as such and to kill him at the first opportunity. However if he is practicing the time honored Islamic tactic of 'al-taqqiya', the deceiving of infidels in order to destroy them or bring them into subjugation to Islam, then he is an Islamic Saint and there would be no Islamic outcry against him.

Is there an Islamic outcry against him, or is there massive Islamic support for him?

Posted by: John | September 2, 2008 5:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just because she has achieved more than you have in your entire life and she is better looking is not a reason to attack her.

Posted by: Dadvocate | September 2, 2008 5:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Let me get this straight....

"She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy." What prior experience does Barack Obama have?

"Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job? She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome. Her first priority has to be her children." This is not the 1960's. I have no doubt that Govenor Palin's husband is capable of being a parent. Are you suggesting that parents of young children should not run for office? Does that include both men and women?

It became apparent with the democrat primary that women were just as guilty of sexist comments and ridicule. Jan Crawford Greenberg had written a very good piece addressing this a few months back, I suggest you read it.
If you have then i suggest you read it again.

You as well as other journalist who support democrats should look in the mirror. You and others have become everything you disliked about the GOP. I am a life long democrat. I am a proud Clinton democrat since 1992, but after the democrat primaryof 2008 I have only disgust for those left leaning liberals who have taken over my party.

Heather Gibson

Posted by: Heather Gibson | September 2, 2008 5:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is one of the most bigoted collumns I've read in a while. I am a Republican and lean toward the family values crowd, what ever the "family values crowd" means. I hope you mean the parents of the child take responsibility for starting a human life, and the family helps that parent to raise and nurture that child instead of aborting it, for the convenience of all involved (except for the child).
But really, this should be a non-issue. Chelsea Clinton was kept under wraps away from the effects of her father's sexual escapades while at work. Barack Obama, the offspring of an 18 year old, dangled his children in front of the media to establish his family values before pulling them back under cover. The media dutifully stayed away from the children.
Now that the Palin family is coping with a mistake their daughter made in a responsible, beautiful way, collumnists from the liberal side of the spectrum have wasted no time in hypocritical attacks on a working mother who's the only candidate with executive experience.
Shame on you.

Posted by: Bob Burns | September 2, 2008 5:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You wouldn't have asked if a man could handle the job due to his large family. How sexist.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 5:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is one of the most bigoted collumns I've read in a while. I am a Republican and lean toward the family values crowd, what ever the "family values crowd" means. I hope you mean the parents of the child take responsibility for starting a human life, and the family helps that parent to raise and nurture that child instead of aborting it, for the convenience of all involved (except for the child).
But really, this should be a non-issue. Chelsea Clinton was kept under wraps away from the effects of her father's sexual escapades while at work. Barack Obama, the offspring of an 18 year old, dangled his children in front of the media to establish his family values before pulling them back under cover. The media dutifully stayed away from the children.
Now that the Palin family is coping with a mistake their daughter made in a responsible, beautiful way, collumnists from the liberal side of the spectrum have wasted no time in hypocritical attacks on a working mother who's the only candidate with executive experience.
Shame on you.

Posted by: Bob Burns | September 2, 2008 5:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You wouldn't have asked if a man could handle the job due to his large family. How sexist.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 5:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well it driving the liberals crazy, here they have a Presidential Canidate that is totally unprepared to be President, and this bright articulate women is stealing their thunder. It is truly amazing to me to watch the so called press fall all over themselves for Senator Obama.Whatever crediability the press had is gone, no longer are they to be trusted with providing imformation. It really a sad time to watch in our history. The press has so isolated themselves from the heart land and the people that they think we are fools, I can assure you, you have made a sad mistake and have done the nation a disservice.

Yours truly,
Charles R. Broyles

Posted by: CHUCK BROYLES | September 2, 2008 5:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well it driving the liberals crazy, here they have a Presidential Canidate that is totally unprepared to be President, and this bright articulate women is stealing their thunder. It is truly amazing to me to watch the so called press fall all over themselves for Senator Obama.Whatever crediability the press had is gone, no longer are they to be trusted with providing imformation. It really a sad time to watch in our history. The press has so isolated themselves from the heart land and the people that they think we are fools, I can assure you, you have made a sad mistake and have done the nation a disservice.

Yours truly,
Charles R. Broyles

Posted by: CHUCK BROYLES | September 2, 2008 5:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

We, the American public, don't care what the so called journalists are reporting. They don't report, they try to influence the news. It appears the era of Edward Murrow, and Ernie Pyle has come and gone. We don't care about the left leaning liberals running rampant in Hollywood. We don't care about the Democrat Party's mantra of "change". The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, NBC, CBS, ABC, etc. are declining to the point of being of no consequence. I say good riddance to them all. Personally, I wouldn't use the Times or the Post to wrap dead fish in. I wouldn't waste my television viewing time on the three major networks either. Please convey my disdain for the so-called reporting bias of the Post. Earnest Scott, B.A., J.D. Abilene, TX

Posted by: Earnest Scott | September 2, 2008 5:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Don't be concerned for the Conservative Evangelical Right, many of us know more than anyone we are "broken" people. I think Jesus put it best when the religious hypocrites brought Him the woman caught in the act of adultery for stoning; "...let the one who has never sinned throw the first stone!” John chapter 8 in the Bible, not a PC book for sure.

Posted by: R Robinson | September 2, 2008 5:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

These reporters/writers need to be fired for reporting false information. This is why newspapers are failing. No one believes the junk anymore. NY Times is the worst and Elisabeth Bumiller is leading the way.

Posted by: Jinks | September 2, 2008 5:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well Sally, I guess the husband will need to attend to the family matters while Sarah is in Washington. Successful parents often are absentee parents. This is why we have private schools: to raise the darlings.

Posted by: Rich Rosenthal | September 2, 2008 5:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You shouldn't question Lord Obamaha! Leave the girl alone....or risk the wrath of Lord Obamaha! Praise be his name.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH HA!

Get a life you jerk!

Posted by: Clone From Star Wars | September 2, 2008 5:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You have to be kidding. Sarah has as much if not more experience then Obama has. In fact she has to run a state and a senator has not that same experience. POINT - Why are most governors elected to president and not senators?

Palin will, just like Bush, Regan and many others, surround themselves with the cabinet of experts. If you think one person has all the answers then maybe it is good to be a democrat. Oblivion of the truth is their foundation.

Palin may not be my choice, but compared to a baby killer who can not tell us when a baby is givin the right to live, but rather answers that is above his pay grade, I would choose Palin. She knows how to lead and has a record. Obama can lead a campaign. But can he lead a nation. Palin is leading a state. What has Obama ever led except for his many contradictions...

SUPPORT McCain and PALIN and stand for AMERICA...

Posted by: Corbin | September 2, 2008 5:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh please, your a better mother or are you even a mother? Who the h-ll cares what.. you think?
Just another wet seat trying to make a living!

regduane@bellsouth.net

Posted by: Walter R Dixon | September 2, 2008 5:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well Sally, I guess the husband will need to attend to the family matters while Sarah is in Washington. Successful parents often are absentee parents. This is why we have private schools: to raise the darlings.

Posted by: Rich Rosenthal | September 2, 2008 5:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

These reporters/writers need to be fired for reporting false information. This is why newspapers are failing. No one believes the junk anymore. NY Times is the worst and Elisabeth Bumiller is leading the way.

Posted by: Jinkster | September 2, 2008 5:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Feeling a little threathened aren't we Sally? Palin is a great choice!

Posted by: Jeff Potts | September 2, 2008 5:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally complained about this too and found it demeaning.

Southern Baptist leaders like Richard Land and Al Mohler have praised McCain's choice. But these are the same men who support this statement from the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message:

"A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation."

I guess she gets upset if the Baptist message sticks a little too closely to the New Testament message. And no, I am not a Baptist.

Ephesians 5:

22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;

Sally for decades has a tendancy to read things into situations that are simply a result of her own overly-active imagination. Check out her phony story about Bezezinski years ago and how her Post story had to be retracted due to lack of facts.

Her obvious can't do attitude is showing again.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 5:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment


FACT:

Clinton had less experience when he was elected PRESIDENT then Palin has as a VP candidate, so stuff it - stuff it - and stuff it some more!

And just wait till Palin lets blow-hard, wind-bag Biden hang himself from his own petard in their debate!

I'd pay to see your smug face then!

Posted by: What did Clinton have? | September 2, 2008 5:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally you cast the first stone and another and another at a teenager who is none of your business. I am sure there is nothing in your background that stones should be thrown at.
I will be voting for McCain and Palin because it will annoy people like you. And besides they are better people than you or Obama.

Posted by: John Merchlinski | September 2, 2008 5:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You Americans should eat so much fast food. The fat is slowing your thought processes! You'd get a long ...hard...spanking in my country.

Posted by: Allah Ben Allah | September 2, 2008 5:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sounds to me like you are just jealous Obama didn't grab her first as a vice presidential pick. At least she will have some ethics and morals, which cannot be said of Hillary.

Posted by: jimconch | September 2, 2008 5:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you should have been aborted, you skank!

Posted by: ted nugent | September 2, 2008 5:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gee, too bad her mom wasnt a better "role model". She could have taught her daughter to sleep with the boss and become a "journalist". Too bad you didnt have a girl, Sally. Some of us OLD Hillary supporters have a long memory. You probably wont post this but it needed saying.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 5:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin's future son in law is quoted on a MySpace page subsequently taken down "I'm a f--in redneck".Ya f--with me I'll kick your ass" he further claims to be "in a relationship" but states "I don't want kids"
Is she really sure she wants her daughter to marry this person.
If these quotes are accurate as reported on TV and in the NY Post what does it say about Sara Palin's judgement and priorities.

Posted by: Louis | September 2, 2008 5:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sounds to me like you are just jealous Obama didn't grab her first.

Posted by: jimconch | September 2, 2008 5:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is to Paul. While he was talking about abortion, your own candidate for president said that he would not want to see his daughters burdened with a baby for a mistake.

As for Sarah Palin. Cudos to her for still running for veep instead of giving her daughter the added guilt of being responsible for her mother losing the chance to be veep. That is a burden that she will not have to live with because of the bravery of these two women.

Posted by: Frances | September 2, 2008 5:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, Sally Quinn you're a real idiot.

Posted by: Jan | September 2, 2008 5:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If you only had a brain.

You give dumb blond a whole new meaning.

Please go back in your hole. You've got no idea about reality in these United States. Stay in the Belt Way.

Posted by: Bobby McSame Yo | September 2, 2008 5:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As predicted, the liberal elites are ravaging Sarah Palin. One thing they DON'T understand is that Sarah is an American woman and represents OUR ideals, not the sexist, liberal, lesbian, male-castrators that represents the left side of the Democrat party. Everytime you hit her, you put one more vote for her on the books! Keep up the hate, you are so good at it!

We, the true women in this country, will make certain that McCain/Palin is in the White House!

Go Liberals!!!!! Ravage away!!!!

Posted by: Susan from California | September 2, 2008 5:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I AGREE!!

Posted by: Charles | September 2, 2008 5:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Miss Quinn this is bad stuff. Not going to work.

Posted by: Bill, Florida | September 2, 2008 5:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally -

A couple of comments please.

First, Mondale lost the 1984 election, not Ferraro. He lost 49 states as I recall and that's because he was wrong for America.

Second, I would like to know what kind of 'family values' regards the slaughter of over 40 million babies as 'choice'. When Rick Warren asked Obama about this he was actually squirming and stuttering trying to answer it. I suspect that you too are just as uncomfortable responding to similar questions. You should be. At least the girl is having the baby and will raise it with her husband-to-be.

Third, you libs run two people, Clinton and Obama, and through the media try to convince us they are legitimate. If the press reporting was worthy of the First Amendment protection both would be political road kill and would never have reached this point. Obama is dangerously unqualified in nearly every way.

Finally, the press feeding frenzy over a 17-year old girl is despicable in every way. People like you are the reason people like me are voting Rebublican. You have no honor or decency, no plan for governance, and no core values. Everything's for sale and nothing is sacred. And you contemptible people think you're fit to run a country!? You must be dreaming. I cannot imagine people of your ilk having access to the power of the federal government.

Posted by: Lee Douglas | September 2, 2008 5:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sour grapes. I have never seen the left so scared! I am really enjoying the show. If you only knew how transparent you all are and how many of us are laughing at you!

Please go on........ it says sooooo much aboout you as a party.

Posted by: Cameron Baird | September 2, 2008 5:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I consider myself a conservative. I have rarely voted for a Democrat. The thing that bothers me about the Palin issue is that we're supposed to swallow all this "loving family" stuff. It's the same that the liberals have been saying for years, but now that it's from the GOP, it's all supposed to feel good and be OK.

Isn't it ironic that Mitt Romney said something to the effect, "I think people should get married before they have children," right before he got the boot from Republican evangelicals.

I see no option in this election for social conservatives.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 5:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are absolutly correct on this -- Ms. Palin is just another silly woman and has no right to the play with the big boys.

Besides, whose going to fix dinner and wash the family clothes?

Posted by: SexistPig | September 2, 2008 5:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Stupid....stupid....stupid.

Posted by: Ben | September 2, 2008 5:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The Dems picked a Black just because he's black then?

Posted by: mrcousteau | September 2, 2008 5:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Even you pagan fire worshipers at "On Faith" believe in Karma.

Hint: The Authors Tribute in Handbook for Radicals

Yeah that's gonna be a real 3itch.

Keep selling the kill your babies - set serial killers free - fecal matter message on a Faith page and see where it gets you. Life is short at best, eternity is a darn long time!

Posted by: You Square Sally is Very Dark | September 2, 2008 5:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Let's see Sally. Sarah is a mother of 5, she has a successful career, she has been called a babe by Rush, and she has a real man for a husband who has been loyal to her for over 20 years through thick and thin. Seems like you are jealous because you don't measure up. Besides that, she has more executive experience than Nobama, and she's not the one running for President. I smell fear.

Posted by: James | September 2, 2008 5:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Note to self: Never read any of Sally Quinn's trash again.

Posted by: Ray Warner | September 2, 2008 5:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's hilarious that the consumate D.C. insider, Sally Quinn, is up the behind of the Messiah of Change, Barack Obama.

What happended, Sally? Did McCain blow off one of your cocktail parties?

Must be nice to hook up with Ben Bradlee and have your ticket punched until dirt sandwich time.

Maybe before you go you will convert to Catholicism so that taking Communion won't make you sick.

Posted by: grunk | September 2, 2008 5:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

liberal garbage-give us a break

Posted by: oliver | September 2, 2008 5:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your column is entitled "On Faith" But you have none! This women is a fireball! She brings "change you can believe in" because she has done it.

Lying Joe Biden has been around since the Nixon years. What has this guy done?

Posted by: Holy Mackel | September 2, 2008 5:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If this were a man, children (even with special needs) would not be a consideration. Talk about cynical!?! You should check your own ideals or lack of them. You just don't understand conservatives and what make them.....and most Americans...tick.

Posted by: Bob | September 2, 2008 5:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gee....would she have been a better role model if she had slept with the boss and become a "journalist" like her mom. Too bad you didnt have a daughter, Sally. Some of us old Hillary voters have long memory. I guess you wont post this, but it needed saying.

Posted by: jeanette pate | September 2, 2008 5:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Look who talking? Do you have any kids? I think your just a feminist, and when a feminist doesn't agree with another women's point of view then their just a plain old women. Her place needs to be at home. Where was your stance for feminist when big Bill was being accused by all those women? Blacks complain about racists but when people like Judge Thomas, Colin Powell or Condellsa Rice get appointed to power, blacks call them Uncle Toms and Aunt Jamimas. YOU NEED TO JUST GO HOME!

Posted by: mrcousteau | September 2, 2008 5:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You wrote:
John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman, You know this because,1.you are a very smart and can read minds, or 2.you are like most liberal numb skulls. I'll think number 2 fits you.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 5:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is this a journalist? Or a liberal blogger?
She sounds like one of the DailyKooks.

Posted by: Ray | September 2, 2008 5:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Were you as negative about the qualifications of Govenor Keane of Virginia, whose resume is very similar to Governor Palin's? Was he a token Catholic on Obama's short list?

Posted by: Jane from Memphis | September 2, 2008 5:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yeesh what hypocrisy. It wasn't that long ago all we heard was " This is Bill and Hillary's private life. We should let them be. " Even though the issue there was more about lying to a Grand Jury. Well we can all see that the private life is fair game depending on what side of the aisle you land on.
You are so blinded by partisanship you can't even detect how transparent you are.

Posted by: Warren L | September 2, 2008 5:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

ha ha ha very funny! You can say what you want, but Palin has FAR more experience than Obama. so every time you talk about her inexperience, and how she isn't ready to be so close to the presidency, you reinforce the notion that Obama is no where near ready to be President. And your mention of the "family values" crowd shows how little you know: family values means you teach your children as best you can to make moral decisions, and love them even if they make a mistake. And while Liberal "family values" means killing 40 million babies, conservative family values means the family steps up, keeps the "surprise" baby, and doesn't just kill it like an unwanted puppy.

Posted by: Curtis | September 2, 2008 5:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am from the evangelical republican base, and I'll tell you what I think: If Palin were a liberal, her daughter wouldn't be 5 months pregnant and nobody would have ever heard about this because the baby would have been aborted!! Oh yeah, and there would be no news about the "Baby Daddy" because she would have taught her daughter that she doesn't need a man, that she has that power right within her, and with an abortion, why would he need to stick around anyway! What the evangelical base will see, is a woman who raised her daughter to take responsibility for her mistakes. The mistake was having sex outside of marriage, the right thing to do is to have the baby, marry the daddy, and make the marriage work. And I'm sure, even though this will be hard for them to do, it will work.

Posted by: Caleb | September 2, 2008 5:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The only thing cynical is Sally Quinn. Where was her reporting on Obama's lack of experience??

Posted by: Frances Daley | September 2, 2008 5:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am surprised that Sally Quinn is shocked.

In the real world, a wining politician promises: 1. a job; 2. hope; and 3. a place in the lifeboat.

In the real world, people are one issue voters.

In the real world, people vote for whom they identify. If 91% of black/Negro/colored (whatever) indicate a preference for Mr. Obama, that is racial pride. If not, then you are racist. If you are an old white woman and voted for Mrs. Clinton, you were voting identity politics. If not, then you are sexist.

Mr. McCain may win, Ms. Quinn. Get over it.

I have a bumper sticker on my car:

Vote
Harry Truman
2008

I haven't seen a presidential candidate with his guts, fortitude and independence in the last several elections Ms. Quinn. How about your writing an article on the glaring deficiencies of all of the candidates.

Posted by: Brian Cochran | September 2, 2008 5:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

More sexist hate from known lesbians.

anyway....

Racist black Muslim Democrat at Philly.com says there will be a race riot if McCain wins. Nothing like a black Muslim cretin threatening physical violence if she doesn't get her way!


http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20080902_Fatimah_Ali__We_need_Obama__not_4_more_years_of_George_Bush.html

My hubby and I are stocking up on guns and ammo, because after naming a strong, smart, beautiful, hardworking, independent woman as his VP, McCain is going to win in a landslide. Bank on it.

Who is surprised that liberal Democrat "journalists" now feel they have to threaten a race war if Obama loses?

Lies, smears and namecalling are all Obama has to run on, because he has no experience being a leader at anything.

Posted by: Ruth Mann Minner | September 2, 2008 4:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win an election. It is a political gimmick. And it's very high risk. I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country."

1) Hmm, isn't the VP choice supposed to be made to help win an election?

2) For a vice presidential candidate, the threshold for experience isn't as high. Being able to take over the Presidency during an emergency isn't the sole criteria for choosing a Vice-President.

3) If anyone is a gimmick, it would be Obama who is running his campaign solely on becoming the first black President - and nothing more.

4) How adept the media has become at tearing down women candidates with such great relish!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn was not ready for network news, and she extrapolates that sad experience to Sarah Palin......................who, by the way, has more executive experience than Apollo Obama. Sally was not ready but Sarah is!!!!!!

Posted by: NC_TEXAN | September 2, 2008 4:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I see that you have read the Democratic response handbook....
1. Palin is the ONLY canditate in the race with ANY executive experience.
2. The fact that she is "only a heartbeat away" from being President is irrelevent. EVERY VP is a heartbeat away from being President. And besides, would you rather have Biden? You've got to be kidding me.
3. Is the Democratic Party blind to the fact that she is the Governor of the state that is closest to an enemy of the US.

Frankly, I don't care if the candidate is a woman, a man or an hermaphrodite. As long as she shares the common sense approach to limited government that I believe in.

Posted by: Rob W | September 2, 2008 4:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

One thing no one is talking about - IF McCain loses - he has brought to national prominence another maverick politician like himself. Four years from now, Palin, HERSELF, will likely be a contender to campaign directly as President.

With a full term as Alaska governor (especially if those 80% approval ratings keep going), and the experience of one Presidential campaign under her belt, Sara Palin will be a major contender for PRESIDENT in 2012. Even if McCain loses in 2008 - he believes he's done something positive by bringing up another "McCain-like" contender.

The idea that Palin was chosen just because she is a woman, given there are many other, less risky candidates - is simply dumb. If McCain was just looking to pick a woman, he would have chosen one of the less risky alternatives (Linda Lingle, Jodi Rell, etc.). He chose Palin because she is a woman with executive experience who believes in doing things the same way he does things. Her being a woman is one positive part of the equation, but it's not the main part.

The Republicans fell apart when they had complete control - spending like crazy. WE NEED A POLITICAL SPLIT BETWEEN the LEGISLATURE and EXECUTIVE office. If one party wins and controls everything, the nation loses. Having a political split keeps each side true to it's stated philosophy.

Posted by: J Barringer | September 2, 2008 4:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment


And after reading all the hit pieces in the daily rags, we now know why readership at the newspapers is at an alltime low.

I guess woman like Sally are upset that a woman can have five kids, be a grandmother, be governor, have a child with special needs, and do all of this by the age of 44 with a smile on her face as she lives the American dream.

Cheer up Sally, not everybody is suppose to be like you.

Pat
Albuquerque

Posted by: Pat | September 2, 2008 4:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I see that you have read the Democratic response handbook....
1. Palin is the ONLY canditate in the race with ANY executive experience.
2. The fact that she is "only a heartbeat away" from being President is irrelevent. EVERY VP is a heartbeat away from being President. And besides, would you rather have Biden? You've got to be kidding me.
3. Is the Democratic Party blind to the fact that she is the Governor of the state that is closest to an enemy of the US.

Frankly, I don't care if the candidate is a woman, a man or an hermaphrodite. As long as she shares the common sense approach to limited government that I believe in.

Posted by: Rob W | September 2, 2008 4:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hypocrisy thy name is Sally Quinn.

Posted by: Robert | September 2, 2008 4:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find your reference to the daughter's pregnancy to be very ironic, given the fact that your candidate has said to lay off the children. I think Hillary is making that 4AM call to you tonight...will you be ready for it?

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 4:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I raised two daughters singlehandedly. I consider myself a feminist. But I was shocked and said that Sarah Palin would agree to accept the nomination as Republican candidate for VP. We women can have it all, but as most of us find out when we choose to be parents, we can't have it all at once. Governor Palin is the mother of a special needs infant and three school age girls, one of whom is going through a very difficult passage as a pregnant, yet-to-be-wed seventeen year old. I find it morally reprehensible that Gov. Palin would accept this position at this period in the life of her family. The role of Governor of Alaska pales in comparison to the demands of a candidate for high office. It involves frequent travel, early morning and late night meetings and jam packed days campaigning. If we choose to have children, then we must also accept the responsibility to parent, love, guide and care for them until they reach maturity. I do not respect Gov. Palin's choice to serve as candidate for VP of the US.

Posted by: Mary Kelly O'Donnell | September 2, 2008 4:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I haven't looked at any of the huge number of comments yet, but I'm bound to repeat some of them.

This is as wrong on as many levels as there are words.

You, Sally Quinn, certainly did your part to bring on this crappy mess we're in with your rants against the Clintons who "trashed" "your" little village.

The Villagers must be getting nervous; the natives in both parties are restless. And they're certainly not listening to the likes of you. Just who is your intended audience? Oh that's right, the other Villagers: Do something! Stop them!

Posted by: nene | September 2, 2008 4:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

BRAVO!!

As the mother of three, I can say without hesitation, that if one of my girls was 17 and pregnant, there would be no way in hell I would expose her to the cruel scrutiny she is currently experiencing. She has a lot on her plate and doesn't need to be the topic of discussion on every news program. And what about her school? How does she go back to school after all of this and face all her classmates? I would like to think that kids wouldn't react at all, but unfortunately, they can be very cruel. She will need all the love and support she can get, particularly from her mother. How can that happen when her mother is so very otherwise involved?

Posted by: Mary Anne Rahm | September 2, 2008 4:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you should have stayed home and been the mother you want every female to be. You simply pronounce that Palin has no experience, without anything in your column to support it. In fact, she is the only one of the four candidates with executive experience! Same kinda experience Bill Clinton had, except he never had a job nor did he ever serve a municipality.

I am appalled that there are women out there like you, Sally, who still believe women should stay home and raise the kids. And, if there are successful women who manage both a career and family (like you say), then where's your beef?

Just because you weren't ready for prime time doesn't mean Palin isn't ready for VP. I would worry more about Obama finishing his term than I would about McCain.

Posted by: Larry Hall | September 2, 2008 4:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is shameful. If a conservative made the same comments about a liberal woman, there would be no end to the outrage. I hope thius sort of hackery continues, as it is so transparant it is sure to drive voters directly to Mrs. Palin and away from the inside the beltway view of the mainstream media.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 4:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I have not seen ONE person on the left suggest that Palins daughter should get an abortion. So it sickens me when all of you pro lifers write posts saying that is what pro choice people are suggesting.

People are pointing out fact that Palin advocates abstinence rather than sex education and that her family should practice what she preaches-period.

It is relevant to me that she is woman or that Palin has 5 kids, what is relevant is that her own family doesnt reflect the values that she expouses to us and expects my children to follow. Dont you have to get your own house in order first???

Please dont write hateful attacks replies, respond to my actual points.

Posted by: Paul | September 2, 2008 4:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a hack.

Ms. Quinn,

Congratulations on hitting ALL of the DNC talking points you've been spoon fed.

...and on not much else.

Posted by: Beyond Belief | September 2, 2008 4:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil. Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well."

I brought up this concern and I was called a sexist.

Let's be fair. A woman with five children and an upcoming grandchild CAN become president. Granted, I DO NOT want that woman to be Sarah Palin. But you're selling your gender short by saying things like that. If you had five kids, you'd still VOTE, right? Would you still say yes if I asked that question in 1920? Because that was the excuse men would have given you not to vote back then.

The "enormous distraction" you speak of is actually putting Bristol's predicament ahead of Sarah Palin's ability to be President. Let's keep Palin's family out of this and focus on her beliefs and track record.

Posted by: Anthony Volpe | September 2, 2008 4:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn: You and your inside the beltway friends in the Democratic Party (and their mouthpiece, the mainstream media) will never get it. Sarah Palin is exactly what this country needs to bring you and your friends down to earth. Watching you and the media get hysterical for 4 years is worth my vote for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Kerry | September 2, 2008 4:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What happend to "CHANGE"....this is a change why not embrass it. And the more i read and watch it seems the president race is between Obama and Palin.. By the way Obama said he is going to change DC and he pick Biden as VP that has been in DC before it wad DC. Give her a chance! By the way the media was not this harsh on H Clinton b/c she is a women but you turn on a dime for Palin. By the she one tough cookie...read how she broke all her digits while working with her husband....thats the kind of mother/wife/president i want. THanks

Posted by: p9ink | September 2, 2008 4:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So did you and Susan Reimer sit down at the same table and compare notes?Disgusting.

Posted by: Larry k | September 2, 2008 4:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You know, with all the "Risks" we seem to go through every election year (Presidential or Congress) with the Washington insiders, professional politicians and primarily none that has ever worked for a living. Why not "Risk" the Presidential election on one of us? Sarah is from "Real Working class". Not from working class parents that sent the kid through college. Also, when we elect a President and VP, we are not electing a King or now possibly a Queen. There are executive orders but there is a Congress who can nix things. Besides, is it not the Left that praised Speaker Pelosi on her trip to the Middle East. What Executive experience does she have? Or even Foreign Policy experience? Lastly, what happened to "women can have-it-all" and "do-it-all", people? Now all of a sudden, you're saying she needs to be barefoot and pregnant at home with the kids?..

PS...this is a complaint directed to both sides of the aisle, Dems and GOP....

Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008 4:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

keep writing and talking no women will be liberal in a few years

Posted by: flogbishop | September 2, 2008 4:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is the exact conversation I have had with my friends and family these past few days. I am a professional working woman with four children. I am a Christian and someone who will vote Democratic for the first time in my life this presidential election. (This was a decision made well before the announcement of Palin as VP nominee.)Leaving aside her total lack of experience on the national/international stage, I would have a hard time supporting a woman who would choose a job over two of her five children who have significant, significant needs right now. This just isn't her time.

Posted by: TLC | September 2, 2008 4:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Very thoughtful!

Posted by: Ronald Smith | September 2, 2008 4:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

YOUR DOCTRINE AND OR PROPOGANDA OF FALSEHOOD DOES NOT SURPRISE ME AS LIE-BERALS HAVE NEVER CONCEDED ACCEPTED AND OR ADMITTED TO ANY OF THE EGREGIOUS OF MULTITUDES OF CRIMES THAT WHICH THEY HAVE COMMITTED EVEN WHEN THEY PLEADED GUILTY IN FEDERAL COURT5 SUCH AS BILL CLINTON FOR PERJURY AND SAMUEL BERGER FOR THE STEALING OF NATIONAL SECURITY DOCUMENTATIONS FROM THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES . WORSE WE HAVE BARACK OBAMA WHO SHOULD BE INDICTED LIKE HIS CONVICTED BLOOD MONEY MACHINE TONY REZKO IN CHICAGO ALONG WITH OTHER CRIMINALS SUCH AS GEORGE SOROS PETER LEWIS . PENNY PRITZKER HIS CHAIRWOMAN FOR HIS PRESIDENTIAL FINANCE CAMPAIGN WHEREFORE PENNY PRITZKER AS THE PRESIDENT OF SUPERIOR BANK FSB .ILL THROUGH CHICANCERY AND FRAUD CAUSED SUPERIOR BANK FSB .ILL TO BE SUBPRIMED MORTGAGE FORECLOSED ON JULY 27.2001 TO THE SUM OF FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS . THE FDIC TOOK CONTROL; OF SUPERIOR BANK FSB .ILL ON JULY 27.2001 . PENNY PRITZKER HAD THE FIRM KNOWN AS MORMON HOLDINGS INC BANKRUPTED WHEREBY THE RICH WEALTHY BILLIONAIRE LIE-BERAL BARACK OBAMA?S BLOOD MONEY MACHINE THE BUYING OF THE PRESIDENCY WARREN BUFFET PURCHASED SIXTY PERCENT OF THE EQUITY OF MORMONS HOLDINGS INC FROM PENNY PRITZKER AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PRITZKER FAMILY FOR THE SUM OF FOUR POINT FIVE BILLION DOLLARS THE BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC EMPIRE AS THE PURCHASING ENTITY . YOU HAVE BARACK OBAMA FRIEND AND ASSOCIATE THE GOVENOR OF PUERTO RICO INDICTED BY FEDERAL PROSECUTORS ON FORTY NINE COUNTS OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES . THE LAW FIRM OF MILBERG WEISS .LLP OF NEW YORK CITY AND IT?S FORMER CHAIRMAN AND CEO MELVYN WEISS ALONG WITH TWO OTHER PARTNERS OF THIS SAID LAW FIRM OF MILBERG WEISS LLP .OF NEW YORK CITY ALL PLEADED GUILTY TO CRIMES COMMITTED TO THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS WIRE WIRE FRAUDS MONEY LAUNDERING INSIDER TRADINGS AND OTHER FEDERAL FELONIES . THIS SAID LAW FIRM AND THE INDIVIDUALS NAMED WERE CRIME MACHINERIES OUTLETS FOR BARACK OBAMA AND OTHER DEMOCRATIC SENATORS WITH DONATIONS OF TENS UPON TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS . PENNY PRITZKER IS VALUED AT TWO BILLION DOLLARS THE ONE HUNDRED THIRTY FIVE RICHEST AMERICANS WHEREBY THE MEDIA DELIBERATELY WITHOLD ALL OF THESE INFORMATION FROM THE PUBLIC ABOUT BARACK OBAMA AND OTHERS .MORE TO COME TREVOR MERCHANT TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 02.200

Posted by: TREVOR MERCHANT | September 2, 2008 4:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally... you're the one that is cynical. As to experience, Sarah Palin has more executive experience than Oblamalamadingdong. Also, Sarah actually has 'accomplishments'. Another area in which Obummer is sadly lacking. Unless, of course, you count serving on a board with William Ayers.

Posted by: Royalsan | September 2, 2008 4:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, you have GOT to be kidding me.

Here, as a 45 year old woman, I have been in the glare of liberal feminism now since I was out of high school. We were "told" to do it all and have it all -- NO BARRIERS to women, nothing you can't do, girls -- whatever you set your mind to. If you want kids, have them, if not, have an abortion, but go on and make sure you have that career, no matter what. You people have been HARPING on this for what, now, 30-40 Years??? We were made to feel SO guilty if we didn't constantly ACHIEVE, ACHIEVE, ACHIEVE!!!!

And now this obviously accomplished and successful woman is selected for VP, and you're steaming MAD about it?? What gives? If this were Barbara Boxer, for example, we'd be CELEBRATING that she as a woman, was able to have a family, career, even a special needs child, yet STILL manage to work as a State Governor!!

Your hypocrisy is just mind blowing. PLEASE, stop your obvious slanted liberal rants -- they are just nauseating.

Posted by: Mabel | September 2, 2008 4:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Very thoughtful!

Posted by: Ronald Smith | September 2, 2008 4:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Forget Bias - this is so far beyond that you actually have a Life Long Feminist arguing against feminism for the moment in this article because they got NOTHING!

Yeah, whatever a Dem does or doesn't do its the greatest thing ever. This can even include perjury. Sure Lying to us is good if a Dem does it!

But a Republican their just lucky to be allowed to breath and the press is free to imagine there dark inner thoughts and write about how evil they are. . .

30 seconds on MSNBC and you'll know I'm not kidding!

Posted by: We Can Whatever - You Can't Anything! | September 2, 2008 4:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What we conservatives want in a candidate, above all else, is CHARACTER. As represented by a belief in God, the constitution, and self reliance. If we get that, we have every reason to believe good decisions will follow, as surely as night follows day.

Sarah Palin has more character in her little finger than Obama & Biden have in their entire bodies combined.

How can I make that statement? Let's see, Gov. Palin's record: successfully fought corruption in her own party, declined to waste taxpayer money on the "bridge to nowhere", used tax breaks to return money to citizens of her state, negotiated a natural gas pipeline deal with Canada, and more - common sense approach to high energy prices, filed suit against labeling Polar Bears as an endangered species (since their numbers have been INCREASING over the last decade), her decision on her last pregnancy as well as her handling of her daughter's first pregnancy, and more.

What about the records of the eminently qualified Obama and Biden? Do they have a singular significant accomplishment between them?

Well, they both demonize the capitalist system, and that's a good thing isn't it..who cares that it has made this country the envy of the world.

Well, at least they both believe in man made global warming,..wait, how many scientists that were once global warming believers have now recanted, such as David Evans? How is it that our SUVs are causing the polar icecaps on Mars to melt again?

Hey, they both believe in private property rights..oops, scratch that, they want to take your money and resdistribute it to those "less fortunate", to "even the playing field".

Sorry, I can't think of anything...you'll have to tell me what it is these two government employees have actually accomplished that improved the life of a single productive American.

You are right about one thing, the world is very dangerous, and this is no time to play politics with our selection of our national leaders.

The last thing we need is two more Ivy League lawyers in charge.

I think the majority of Americans would much rather have an old fighter pilot teamed with a lady of impeccable character, and who seems to have enough common sense to possibly change McCain's mind on drilling in Anwar.

Common sense seems to be in terribly short supply in D.C. these days.

Posted by: John in Alabama | September 2, 2008 4:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If you presume to know what John McCain was thinking when he chose his running mate, you are a minority of one in political circles.

And if you think he only chose her because she's a woman (I hear echoes of insults to Sen. Clinton as I type), you need to do some real research. Use Google Archives and look back through her career.

How many men with children have you questioned about being up for their job? Didn't think so.

Kay B. Day
The US Report

Posted by: Kay B. Day | September 2, 2008 4:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What happend to "CHANGE"....this is a change why not embrass it. And the more i read and watch it seems the president race is between Obama and Palin.. By the way Obama said he is going to change DC and he pick Biden as VP that has been in DC before it wad DC. Give her a chance! By the way the media was not this harsh on H Clinton b/c she is a women but you turn on a dime for Palin. By the she one tough cookie...read how she broke all her digits while working with her husband....thats the kind of mother/wife/president i want. THanks

Posted by: PINK | September 2, 2008 4:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

She and other liberals really know NOTHING about evangelicals or conservatives. They think we beat our daughters for getting pregnant and then ship them off to Aunt Bertha to hide for the rest of the pregnancy.


Posted by: Linda Martinez | September 2, 2008 4:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama gives a speech last week about equal rights and equal pay for women and Sally Quinn argues that a woman is incapable of being the Vice President and caring for her children at the same time. Wow! This is the real insult to women.

Posted by: GC | September 2, 2008 4:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

From Wikipedia:

"Quinn and Bradlee have one child, [Josiah] Quinn Crowninshield Bradlee who was born in 1982 when she was 41. They have acknowledged that he was born with velo-cardio-facial syndrome."

And yet you continue to work.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Look at her meteoric rise in the state of Alaska. She really has been shaking things up there, she's a serious reformer, honest and upright, a fighter of corruption.

As a governnor, she has been tremendously successful. She has a favorable polling rating among Alaskans that is IN THE 80's! That is to say, more than 4 of 5 Alaskans approve of the job she's doing.

If you just look at that alone, she'd be a good choice for Veep. Fact is, being "experienced" counts for much less than having principles, judgment, and integrity. And she does have executive experience, of which Obama has none.

I'll take a limited amount of experience like Palin has over just about anything else out there. You're just wrong on this one.

Posted by: Palin NOT just a sop to women voters | September 2, 2008 4:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Re: Palin's Pregnancy Problem

This column is laughable. Palin's executive experience is superior to that of either of the Democrats, and even McCain's executive experience was military rather than governmental. Further, she is an effective reformer, something that neither Obama nor Biden can even hint at.

Regarding "leader of the free world," whom would you rather have face Putin or Ahmedinejad—Sarah Barracuda or Barry the Squish? i know who would be my choice.

Posted by: Richard Donley | September 2, 2008 4:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find this blog insulting to all women!
The author mixes in "opinioned ideas" to support and twist facts to her slanted viewpoint.

On Faith??? what a joke you've made this concept.

Posted by: Margaret Truman | September 2, 2008 4:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Nice article!. Unfortunately this election seems to have too much discussion around race & gender. People have been too anxious to see a colored or women president/VP in office... to the extent that they are willing to overlook the merit factor. This is not good! The country has been making great progress in tearing down the race & gender barrier. Having colored and/or women President is likely to happen in the near future (if not in this election). So I hope those factors don't determine this election. I'm a non Caucasian, male immigrant... and I supported Hillary Clinton in the primaries because of only one reason... She was the most qualified candidate. Period! The country's future is at stake and let's elect our President purely on merit.

Thanks

Posted by: Sonny | September 2, 2008 4:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The left will one day destroy our country....mark my words.

Posted by: Wisdom gone on the left | September 2, 2008 4:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

To the writer IMMORAL PREGNANY

You say bottom line is to keep her legs SHUT!

Remember it takes two to dance. So why not tell him to keep the misssle in the silo so there are no mis-fires.

What gives you, or anyone, the right to judge her.
But then I know your children, if you have any, have never made a mistake.

Posted by: Jim W | September 2, 2008 4:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

For some reason someone appointed you to single out the sins of the politicians, not not just any politicians, Republicans...
I'm sure you did things to get where you are, entertain a few bosses, you know what I mean...
is not your cup full, women...

Posted by: Dwight | September 2, 2008 4:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I have a question for all of you conservative people who are pro Palin-

How many of you would think she was a great selection for ticket if she was Pro Choice?
Be honest.

At least call a spade a spade-most of far right likes her because of her "values"-not her experience or lack thereof.

That being said-her values should be reflected in her children-I dont have anything against premarital sex-but I thought you value oriented people did.

Lastly, the experience issue is being raised by the so called leftists in response to the last 6 month of campaing ads by repubs criticizing Obama's lack of same

Why isnt it fair game?

Posted by: Reasonable | September 2, 2008 4:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

I don't think Palin would have taken the job offer if she didn't feel she was up to it. Seriously, I'm sure she would thank you for your concern for her and her families well-being...if she cared.

I believe Palin thought this decision through. I'm sure she knew that the pregnancy of her daughter would become public. I think McCain knew about it also.

Ultimately, McCain's decision blows apart the democrat accusations that "McCain is Bush". Bush would NEVER have the brass to make a decision like Palin. It proves to the people of this country that McCain is his own person and that scares the hell out of socialists. Individual thinking and responsibility always does.

Posted by: Lance | September 2, 2008 4:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, what a lame argument. "Her first priority has to be her children." Maybe Sarah Palin sees her role as the winning edge on the Republican ticket as serving that first priority. I would consider myself as failing my two daughters if I did not do what I could to keep two of the most liberal voting members of the US Senate from ruining our economy and our great country. Oh, and great rationalization for allowing yourself and Nancy Pelosi to keep your jobs. Maybe we men should just keep all you women at home, barefoot and pregnant! Wouldn't that be a step forward for feminism!

Posted by: Roger in Lafayette, LA | September 2, 2008 4:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey Sally,What are you smokin? The Republican VPcandidate has a much more impressive resume than the Dems presidential candidate.I know the irony must be so painful that theres a pretty good chance that the first woman POTUS will be a conservative Republican.Thanks for helping to convince me to donate to the McCain campaign.

Posted by: WJD | September 2, 2008 4:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama is half american but nobody says anything, but as it goes if your born in america (hawaii) that makes you an american, next president will be Jose born in america.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Never in my life have I ever seen such blatant misuse of media power to throw elections in favor of the Socialists/Soviets - from Don Hewitt (who admittedly skewed the Nixon/Kennedy TV debate in favor of Kennedy) to Dan Rather's crude attempt to foist the election - the propaganda is overwhelming.

Why such hate on the left?

Two Americas: WE get free speech, YOU get hate speech; WE get mansions like Gore, Edwards, Pelosi, Rockefeller, etc. but YOU can't count your own homes, mister real estate entrepreneur; WE are protected, but YOU must be disarmed.

Lincoln said it best, and I paraphrase: "those from within will destroy us..."

Posted by: zucco | September 2, 2008 4:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Evangelicals are psychologically deluded individuals, as are all who think they "have it right" on the idea of a god or gods. You can have faith, you can have hope, you can feel strongly, but taking your ideas on deity to the level of fact is neurosis. It smacks of poor mental development, poor awareness, and is in fact the height of selfishness. I respect people's faith, when it is only faith, not ego projection. For faith to be valid it must be nested in honest and candid uncertainty, that is the beautiful and noble struggle that makes faith hard work. You use your free will to hold your faith in one hand, uncertainty in the other, you just hold tighter to the faith.

Posted by: CK | September 2, 2008 4:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The right wing says that a 17 year old should not be made an issue. Can you imagine what Rush would have said if this had been an obama daughter that was pregnant. Not only would they focus on the poor parenting and loss of family control. They would say what do you expect from a black man. I would prefer that this was not an issue, but frankly this VP choice was a poor one.

Posted by: mick | September 2, 2008 4:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Great article, this really sums up everything I had been thinking. John McCain has put his own ambitions rather than the country first and so has Palin.

Posted by: Mrs. C | September 2, 2008 4:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment


So let me get this right?

Democrats are now for:

Women staying home, not pursuing careers plus barefoot and pregnant.

Segregation in schools where black children are not taught to read and write proper English.

Eliminate Free Speech by passing the "Fairness Doctrine"

Screaming like spoiled children when everything does not go their way.

I'm sure I missed a bunch but I think I've got the general idea where this is all going.

PS Alaska is bigger then Arkansas (Clinton) and Delaware (Biden) combined so you might want to drop that stupid attack line too.

Posted by: The New Dem Party | September 2, 2008 4:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I have not read a more insulting column to women in my life. Whether you agree with Sarah Palin's politics or not, the argument that she can't do her job because she has to take care of her kids is just so insulting and sets women back. My wife, who is a liberal and voting for Obama, has been furious at the way Palin has been characterized in the media.

Also, Sally Quinn's ego knows no bounds when she says that she was once in a "similar position" because she was asked to be a news reader. Guess what, Sally? Thousand upon thousands of women have risen to the occasion when taking on new opportunities. Sorry it didn't work out for you. Maybe someday it will.

Posted by: Steve Bennett | September 2, 2008 4:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

it seems since she's not a liberal thinking woman she's not qualified, but if she was in the democratic party you would be bragging on her. Lets face it your just bias....

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, You obviously hit a nerve and thank goodness you did!

If McCain and the Repubs wont vet their VP candidate, the intelligent American voters will.

This is almost comical. I feel like a kid on Christmas morning. McCain just gave the election to the Obamites!

McCain was strong armed into ignoring Leiberman and selecting an unexperienced individual who just happens to be a woman.

Palin is a woman, but in the words of another VP candidate, You Sara Palin are NO HILLARY CLINTON.

You cant nor will win this election simply because of your gender.

Dont insult me!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, I didn't know you were still alive. I'm surprised, but pleased to see that you are still with us.

Posted by: bc3 | September 2, 2008 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Terribly sexist article.

Posted by: Charlie | September 2, 2008 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a tired legacy - if a "Democrat" does something it's ok, but if a "Republican" does (or doesn't do) something it's automatically bad. If the sun shines today it must be global warming.

Never in my life have I ever seen such blatant misuse of media power to throw elections in favor of the Socialists/Soviets - from Don Hewitt (who admittedly skewed the Nixon/Kennedy TV debate in favor of Kennedy) to Dan Rather's crude attempt to foist the election - the propaganda is overwhelming.

But why? Why such hate on the left?

Two Americas: WE get free speech, YOU get hate speech; WE get mansions like Gore, Edwards, Pelosi, Rockefeller, etc. but YOU can't count your own homes, mister real estate entrepreneur; WE are protected, but YOU must be disarmed.

Lincoln said it best, and I paraphrase: "those from within will destroy us..."

Posted by: zucco | September 2, 2008 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your comments are stunningly ignorant and sickening and illustrate very well the left-wing bias that you have.

Posted by: Daniel Ogden | September 2, 2008 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If she was a liberal, "her first priority" would be her career, but since she's a conservative, "her first priority" is to stay at home, "barefoot and pregnant", certainly not on the campaign trail threatening to take down the mainstream media-backed Obama steamroller.

Posted by: Brother Crimewave | September 2, 2008 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why is it that if a male voter such as myself is not offended by McCain picking a femail VP, that Sally Quinn is? I happen to like who she is and what she stands for, not that a "woman" was put on the ticket. If we are truly ever going to get past the race issue or the gender issue, the media needs to quit making a big deal of it.

Posted by: Craig | September 2, 2008 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If she cared about her child she should have turned down the offer of the VP slot not as a woman but as a parent of either sex. Not because she can't handle the children and the job (there is always help)but she shouldn't have exposed her daughter to national scrutiny. It is tough enough to be 17 and pregnant but to have the whole world discussing it is humiliating. Palin clearly cared more about herself and her career than her daughter. I doubt that she asked her daughter's opinion.

Posted by: Laura | September 2, 2008 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If she was a liberal, "her first priority" would be her career, but since she's a conservative, "her first priority" is to stay at home, "barefoot and pregnant", certainly not on the campaign trail threatening to take down the mainstream media-backed Obama steamroller.

Posted by: Brother Crimewave | September 2, 2008 4:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are obviously unqualified to be a writer either. Make up your mind (the inability to do so is a women trait), a female can have a career and be a parent too or not? Your rant fails to deliver a clear opinion (hence a rant)

Posted by: Fred | September 2, 2008 4:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Sarah Palin was a Democrat and pro-abortion, the media would be having multiple orgasms like they do for the "holy one" Obama. We conservative are more excited then we have been for years about this choice. For once, we have someone who isn't another "pickled in Washington" legislature who has no experience in the executive branch. She's going to make a lot of people eat their words (and then some). I love it!

Posted by: Art Chick with Brains | September 2, 2008 4:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Washington Post rules for posting:

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or "personal attacks" or other "inappropriate comments" or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to "block users who violate" any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site.


I guess Ms. Quinn’s article will need to be removed due to the Post’s own posting standards. Petty personal attacks are all you can muster Ms. Quinn! You can do better research and come up with some fact based comparisons to the democratic ticket can’t you?

Posted by: scott51 | September 2, 2008 4:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

OMG another politically directed newspaper article. How can you all look in the mirror and not be ashamed. How about focusing on something that matters like Obama's socialist goals for America v. McCains capitalistic society (that which has made America great). My final point- I am also amazed at the fact that newspapers are shocked that their subscribers are falling off. This trashy article is exactly why. Journalism....I think not. Political agenda from the Washington comPost....for sure.

Posted by: kern | September 2, 2008 4:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In my 35 years in the workplace (and a male) I have witnessed sexual discrimination 4 times from executives. Each and every time it was a woman executive discriminating and other men, including me, had to defend the woman being discriminated against. 2 times involved women going out on pregnancy leave, 1 time with a woman the woman executive thought "might" get pregnant, and 1 time because a woman was thought to be "too friendly" to males at work.

Posted by: skucount | September 2, 2008 4:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So the Post's Style Section writer is judging qualifictions for the President?

Posted by: bristol | September 2, 2008 4:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So Palin will fail as a VP becuase you were a "disaster" as an anchorwoman? Geesh!

Posted by: Reality bites | September 2, 2008 4:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?"

What? You ADMIT that Obama has no foreign policy experience.

If your side wins Obama will UNCONDITIONALLY become president.

If your side loses Palin will CONDITIONALLY become president.

You obviously prefer certainty.

A guarantee that America will be destroyed.

That wonderful combination of Sharia Law and Socialism will do the job.

Good luck!

Jim Mukubansky

Posted by: JIm Mukubansky | September 2, 2008 4:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you're being a silly, irrational woman. Just kidding.

Seriously, though... why don't you just come out and say you want Obama to win and will write anything to help his cause. At least that would be a genuine article. You sound spiteful and jealous and frantic in the article above.

This column is weak on so many points and I'm sure it will be ripped to shreds for the trash that it is on talk radio, but I'll point out one issue you brought up: Palin's daughter being pregnant will not hurt her among evangelicals... everyone in America has experienced this type of family crisis at one time or another. It will help her identify with them. Plus, the daughter is making the correct choice in marrying her boyfriend (according to evangelical values). So... what's the problem?

You're reaching. Try again.

Posted by: Ricky and Corrie Rater | September 2, 2008 4:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn:

"This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil."

Sally, I hope the next time you go for a job interview, your personal life is examined and the intereviewer concludes that your family obligations would interfere with your ability to the job.

Com'on, Sally, think before repeating democrat talking points. You're insulting women in a real way and this nonsense is going to back fire.

Posted by: The Happy Infidel | September 2, 2008 4:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Are these pictures of Bristol Palin drinking alcohol? Worse yet, are these pictures of Brisol Palin with empty alcohol bottles on her bedroom shelves in her parent's home? Is that her underage boyfriend sleeping in her bed in her parent's HOME? If these pictures are authentic, then why didn't Gov. Palin put a stop to this behavior? Why does she allow her daughter to put empty alcohol containers up on her wall? Will these pictures be authenticated?

http://www.stupidsheeple.com/index.php/2008090140/latest/bristol-palin-gone-wild.html

Posted by: Something is ROTTEN in Alaska | September 2, 2008 4:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Check a calendar. This is 2008, not 1908. These questions would not even be thought of if this exact same situation involved a man running for VP rather than a woman. Her husband is a stay-at-home dad. Unless you think fathers are incapable of loving, nurturing and rearing their children as well as a mother, I don't see what the problem is.

Since when does John McCain have one foot in the grave anyway? Has anyone told him? When was the last time we had a president die in office? How old was he? So there goes that argument.

I am one of Hillary's 18 million voters. I refuse to condone the voter fraud and intimidation of the primaries from Obama, so I'll be casting my vote for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Cindy | September 2, 2008 4:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I suspect that this is a witch hunt to bring down palin.

Palin does have more Executive-Leadership experience than Obama. Running the state government of Alask for two years and previous to that Running a City Government. That is four years of Executive-Leadership.

Now it's Obama's turn.
2 yrs as a state senator, no significant piece of legislature has been spearheaded by him. Many times he has not voted at all.

Obama claims that running his campaign has given him leadership,.. no it hasn't you don't run your campaign manager does.

How in the Hell did Obama get Super-Stardom, What did he do to deserve Super-Stardom? I handn't even heard of him until this election.

Answer me this question? Who is more likely to make a decision that is not based upon his party politics - Obama? or McCain?

Please take the time to search "Fatima Ali" her article is spreading Hate-Mongering and she is an african american,.. This election is not based upon race, but the Dems would have you think it is.

Posted by: Spanish Inquisition | September 2, 2008 4:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well Sally, If you're going to play the experience card, let's be fair and look at Obama's experience. Your man Obama is possibly the least experienced person ever to run for president, having a resume as thin as rice paper and a sad history of cultivating the wrong people throughout his brief career. Among those Obama is tied to are the unreconstructed 1970s Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers, who Obama supported as a community activist; the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, a racist church leader who, in the 20 years Obama attended his church, made a career out of decrying America and white people in general; Tony Rezko, the former campaign fund-raiser who assisted Obama with the purchase of his home three years ago, and who was convicted in June on 16 counts of corruption; Nadhmi Auchi, the Iraqi-born billionaire who bankrolled Rezko the day before the housing deal was settled in 2005, and who has had his US visa revoked because of what the Pentagon calls ``significant and credible evidence’’ of involvement in the Oil for Food scandal and illicit smuggling of weapons to Saddam Hussein’s regime. Quite the Chicago Democratic machine team by any measure, but apparently not worth a mention by you.

Posted by: Kilroy | September 2, 2008 4:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

Are you on the Obama or Democratic Parties payroll or are you just in the TANK! I saw your CNN interview today and it made me want to vomit.
I think that you are two faced on this issue, saying it is alright for some women, (including yourself) to have a full time job and still take care of their children but due to the size of Palin's family and the special needs child and because she is a conservative she should stay home! You should be ASHAMED of yourself.

PS: I'm a Democrat and voted for Hilary and now I'm voting for Palin.

Posted by: Bill E Betts | September 2, 2008 4:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Here's the bottom line -- Palin did not raise her children correctly. The first thing you tell a young daughter is -- keep the legs SHUT! This is not to mention the series of talks that need to occur around the importance of marriage before sex, and respect for the body. This effectively rules out her running on a ticket that highlights family values and high morals. The problem for McCain is that he'll look worse if he forces her off the ticket and chooses 'again'. McCain may not recover from this serious gaffe.

Posted by: Immoral Pregnancy | September 2, 2008 4:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Only to the hysterical Left is a pregnancy a "mistake" or a "scandal" instead of a choice.

Posted by: mdk | September 2, 2008 4:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This proves that liberals have bankrupt their own arguments. You are not for women's rights, you are for liberal's rights. It's amazing the hypcracy you display, you should be ashamed.

Posted by: Concerned | September 2, 2008 4:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The Choice of Palin by McCain is an example of very poor judgment. It is an insult to American citizens who need a strong leadership to steer this country out of the huge problems it is facing now. This is an utter disregard of the expectations of the millions of voters waiting for some thing new to happen.

McCain always bragged that he puts his country first even if he has to lose the election. When you choose your VP who is unknown to most of the Americans and who has no experience to hold such an important position for the whole country, you seemed to have done this only to get some extra votes from Evangelist group and disgruntled Hillary supporters. This is not a right move for a patriotic leader for the wellbeing of America. This is support for Evangelical group first and country last.

I do not blame Palin and her daughter but I believe that the vetting was not done properly. John McCain’s selection now exposed some one’s private family affairs
to the whole world. Now McCain and his team will have to keep on worshipping Palin and her family to cover their wrong selection.

Posted by: panna dasgupta | September 2, 2008 4:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

All the facts need to be in news situations, facts based on researched information, not a bit here and there to make a point. I do not think John McCain made his VP choice solely, or even a large percentage, because she is a woman. A factor, probably. However, listen to a wide range of news reporting, from several legitimate sources for balance, to get what I term the "news truth" of a situation. I think who she is resounded a like chord in Senator McCain, and think she is capable of fast track preparedness. Only time will tell, and there is very little of that til November, and this story will be fascinating to study every day.

Posted by: News Truth Seeker | September 2, 2008 4:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You have stated what no one else seems to be willing to say or too scared to say. I agree with you. Thanks.

Posted by: Jacgram | September 2, 2008 4:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Give us a break with the manufactured outrage. You're going to write about a V.P. candidate's daughter being pregnant and unwed, yet your candidate for President was born under the same circumstances to an unwed teenage mother.

You ask: "And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?"

However, I ask: How can anyone have a problem with Palin as V.P. simply because she lacks experience, yet not have a problem with Obama being President, who has zero executive experience and is utterly unqualified for the job?

Posted by: Randy | September 2, 2008 4:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If she was a democrat she would be celebrated by you types. She is everything a feminist supposedly champions, but everyone knows that feminism is really just liberalism - hence, the venom from leftist chicks. Typical and expected.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

I really want to respond to your article, but as a conservative subservient wife I cannot get a hold of my husband to first get his permission.

Posted by: Kajon | September 2, 2008 4:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a conservative, evangelical, mother, and voter I am highly insulted. First of all, please explain to me the different roles of men and women in the house. I believe that the only person pigeon holing anyone is you, Ms Quinn, and not the evangelical base in America. It disgusts me that intelligent women in this country are turing against another intelligent woman (Gov. Palin) and flinging sexist filth at her. If Gov. Palin was a male and had a 17 year old pregnant daughter and a baby boy with down syndrome, no one would accuse him of lacking family values for choosing to further his career by running for elected office, even though his children need him just as much as their mother.

In addition to your ludicrous remarks concerning Gov. Palin's "role" as a woman, you compare running for vice president to your own pursuit of a news anchor position. That is by no means the same thing. It's sort of like Senator Obama comparing running a political campaign to being the governor of a state with the 6th highest GDP per capita in the US.

Posted by: Chill | September 2, 2008 4:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I saw the CNN interview and was appalled. Your comments were highly inappropriate and indicate just how desperate the liberal media is. I just hope all those Hillary supporters were watching because you did a brillant job of firing up support for Palin!

Posted by: Eileen | September 2, 2008 4:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find it was a refreshing choice. You state the choice for Palin was made so McCain could win the election. Like Obama choice of Binden was so he could loose the election.

While they have a child with special needs, and will now be grandparents, I challege you would never have made the asinine statement if it Mr. Palin instead of Mrs. Palin being selected.

I can't understand why the vicious attack! Having spoke to many, many people, mostly women, all across the fine United States since Friday I have found by far the majority are excited, and not once have I heard such an attack spouted from anyone as you have done. Any negative reaction was they wanted to see the debates and how she handles herself, but they were still all glad of the choice. I spoke to people of both parties and as I said not 1 attack as I have seen in the liberal newpapers and journalist.

Is Clinton the only woman in this country qualified as a woman to run for President or VP.

I believe you own an apology to your readers.

Posted by: Jim W | September 2, 2008 4:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The McCain camp and Republican party are both blatantly using Sarah Palin and her teen-age daughter to promote their own 'family values' agenda. Pathetic and desperate. She should have said 'I appreciate the offer, but I have to decline. I have new baby to raise, a daughter to support, a family to care for and a state to run'.

Posted by: JMK | September 2, 2008 4:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You need to find a rock and go climb under it for the rest of your life. Middle American doesn't NOT care what you have to say!

Posted by: Jill | September 2, 2008 4:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It seems to me that Sally is merely pointing out some realistic limitations, that women have to face in the real world, drawing from her own experience as a working mother. Most everything she said seemed about right to me.

Judging from the number of comments, she has really struck a nerve. I cannot possibly read them all; my web-browser keeps crashing, when I try to read even a few.

But I have noticed that many of the posters seem to hate Sally, for no apparent good reason. And many of the posters also like to use any opportunity they can to cast their racist bombs at Obama, and even seem proud of themselves, that they oppose him because he is black and for no other reason.

Posted by: Daniel in the Lion's Den | September 2, 2008 4:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Very well stated.
Palin's experience comes down to consequences. Her entire state has only 600,000 people in it! She was mayor of a town that had less than 7,000 people in it. How can that experience possibly compare with the challenges we are facing now?

And people can try to throw the "experience" argument back at Obama, but he has co-authored Nuclear Non-Proliferation legislation. Welfare to Work legislation. Legislation that gave health care to 150,000 children. Ethics Reform legislation. President of the Harvard Law Review, a group which 6 Supreme Court Justices have come from. Illinois has a population of 12 MILLION. Palin's experience does not compare in anyway to what Obama has expereinced.

Posted by: Krissy | September 2, 2008 4:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman and one who appealed to the Republican's conservative evangelical base."

What don't you liberals get about it? It is the conservative base that brings a republican into office. If McCain had choosen Leiberman, the conservatives would have walked and he would have lost.

Despite the fact you are running a socialist for office, most conservatives were still not too happy with a moderate (McCain). McCain made a good choice. He selected a conservative to sure up his party's base. I think it will work. Furthermore, I believe Palin will convince Hillary soccer moms to vote for McCain. (Of course, the hard core feminist, abortion on demand types, will vote for the liberal.)

Listen, hard core feminists are mad because Palin proven that a woman can get ahead, without abortion, quotas, an equal pay amendment, NOW, socialist daycare and healthcare scemes, ect. You are mad because Palin offers another road to success besides your failed socialist, abortionist ways. Feminism, as we knew it, is dead.

Posted by: Kneller | September 2, 2008 4:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Very well stated.
Palin's experience comes down to consequences. Her entire state has only 600,000 people in it! She was mayor of a town that had less than 7,000 people in it. How can that experience possibly compare with the challenges we are facing now?

And people can try to throw the "experience" argument back at Obama, but he has co-authored Nuclear Non-Proliferation legislation. Welfare to Work legislation. Legislation that gave health care to 150,000 children. Ethics Reform legislation. President of the Harvard Law Review, a group which 6 Supreme Court Justices have come from. Illinois has a population of 12 MILLION. Palin's experience does not compare in anyway to what Obama has expereinced.

Posted by: Krissy | September 2, 2008 4:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If this was a Democratic choice this article never would have been written. You can bet that Senator Biden will not face the scrutiny and articles like this. I don't know which is more accurate. The Times is more Biased or more Sexist.

Posted by: Gary K | September 2, 2008 4:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Has McCain abandoned the concept of public officials being role models or at least pretending to be? McCain actually listed Palin's experience on the PTA as qualifying her for being President. She is not qualifed, nor is McCain qualified to be dogcatcher.

Posted by: Jason | September 2, 2008 4:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Keep 'em barefoot and pregnant. A woman's place is in the home. It was a mistake to give them the right to vote to start with.

Ms. Quinn must be outlining the new Democrat position on women's rights.

Posted by: grunk | September 2, 2008 4:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WOW you are stupid as hell....you sure you're really a journalist?

Posted by: Jaco Pataya | September 2, 2008 4:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn... Suffers Indsidebeltwayosis of the Democratic Strain.

Quotes followed by rebuttal by a simple minded engineer from fly-over country.

QUINN: “She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy.” …. Careful the comparison Sally, the Reports of the impending death of John McCain are grossly premature and that phrase pin-points the essence of Obama’s weakness. In fact replace “She” with “He” and you have the essence of the POTUS choice of the Democrats…

QUINN: “ That fact that she is not of Washington also will be difficult for her.”
… Now isn’t that like a typical liberal… Always protecting people from their difficulties? But seriously
… Inside the Beltway, Sally, where you are, no doubt certain all wisdom and great insider cocktail parties exist, phrases like this rings true… To the millions of Americans who have hoped for major politicians whose origins are more akin to intent of the founding fathers, “ that one should arise to public service from local trades and businesses, to take on representation on behalf of his countrymen”.

QUINN: “But she said nothing can prepare you for the criticism and scrutiny of being in the White House. Sarah Palin is not prepared for that.”

QUINN: “Now, with news that Palin's 17-year-old unmarried daughter is pregnant, McCain's pick may not even find support among "family values" voters.”….
WRONG! On all counts… Evidently Ms. Quinn’s belief in a neat and tidy “Beltway Cocktail Circle Life” may not find these things convenient but for those of us, family value folks, who have found our beloved daughters in this situation, we have made lemonade from lemons and our “family values” are further developed and resurrected by taking on both the burdens and joys of new grand children. We sympathize with the Palins and understand life goes forward and there is no reason for it to go forward negatively in any way.

Posted by: ADK | September 2, 2008 4:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Sally Quinn... Suffers Indsidebeltwayosis of the Democratic Strain.

Quotes followed by rebuttal by a simple minded engineer from fly-over country.

QUINN: “She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy.” …. Careful the comparison Sally, the Reports of the impending death of John McCain are grossly premature and that phrase pin-points the essence of Obama’s weakness. In fact replace “She” with “He” and you have the essence of the POTUS choice of the Democrats…

QUINN: “ That fact that she is not of Washington also will be difficult for her.”
… Now isn’t that like a typical liberal… Always protecting people from their difficulties? But seriously
… Inside the Beltway, Sally, where you are, no doubt certain all wisdom and great insider cocktail parties exist, phrases like this rings true… To the millions of Americans who have hoped for major politicians whose origins are more akin to intent of the founding fathers, “ that one should arise to public service from local trades and businesses, to take on representation on behalf of his countrymen”.

QUINN: “But she said nothing can prepare you for the criticism and scrutiny of being in the White House. Sarah Palin is not prepared for that.”

... So Sally, just because you aren't tough enough and moms and dads have a hassle, does that mean all people function the same?.... This is a claim without backup.

QUINN: “Now, with news that Palin's 17-year-old unmarried daughter is pregnant, McCain's pick may not even find support among "family values" voters.”….
WRONG! On all counts… Evidently Ms. Quinn’s belief in a neat and tidy “Beltway Cocktail Circle Life” may not find these things convenient but for those of us, family value folks, who have found our beloved daughters in this situation, we have made lemonade from lemons and our “family values” are further developed and resurrected by taking on both the burdens and joys of new grand children. We sympathize with the Palins and understand life goes forward and there is no reason for it to go forward negatively in any way.

Posted by: ADK | September 2, 2008 4:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In what religion are you offering your perspective? What is it that so horrifies you about this woman? I sense some jealously. The experience is laughable, Obama has none. Instead of questioning issues that have no bearing; why not look at her actual accomplishments, something Obama is painfully missing. How about watching the reaction of Obama spokesman when the name Williams Ayers comes up and ask a pertinent question: Why are you people so agitated. This is going to be painful for people like yourself when the mud slinging of the unimportant comes back in the final vote. These kinds of silly attacks will turn this into an actual race. So, transparent.

Posted by: Scott | September 2, 2008 4:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Azulu says:

"Can you imagine a conservative writer saying of a Democrat, 'She should stay home and take care of her kids instead of run for office'?"


Bingo. The lib mainstream media seem hell-bent on establishing their own hypocrisy -- establishing it as a thing beyond the pale. They have become truly revolting.

Can you say "huge, stinking backlash"?

The lib mainstream media have really put their collective foot in it this time.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 4:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally what does it say to you that out of over 2,400 responses, I conservatively (no pun intended) estimate that 80% think you're a hack?

It tells me that the other 20% are either too young to know better or just intend to go through life with "stupid" written on their foreheads.

Here's what else it tells me - I'll give you my journalistic opinion - although I have no journalistic experience, but then again, apparently neither do you and the rest of the OAS (Obama Assasin Squad)- Obama's going to lose in November and the biggest reason is that the majority of Americans realize that your liberals do not represent the majority in this country. Democrats, despite what they say, liberal media reports and leftist Hollywood spouts (collectively the OAS), only care about one thing - keeping otherwise good Americans down, keeping them dependent on big government and keeping them under their thumbs.

To you and all the other ignorant liberals posting here today I sincerely feel sorry for you all that you don't have a candidate as "American" as Gov. Palin. But I have no pity for you that you are too stupid to realize it.

From time to time the herd needs to be culled - Palin knows what I talking about - it's kinda a hunter thing, you wouldn't understand...

Posted by: patriot | September 2, 2008 4:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So McCain picks a woman. The democrats are sooo pissed off because Hillary was not selected. Now they have to vent on Gov. Palin.

Posted by: Independent Voter | September 2, 2008 4:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I saw the CNN interview and was appalled. Your comments were highly inappropriate and indicate just how desperate the liberal media has become. I hope all those Hillary supporters were watching because you did a great job at firing up support for Palin.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 4:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I personally realize that Sen. McCain feels the intensity of the comments across the nation and would better be well served if he makes a swift decision to ask Gov.Palin to consider dropping the offer as a result of unforeseen family issues; that may challenge her as vice-president and possibly a president. This action is very necessary to avoid further division of the Republican Party as well as the nation already divided by other critical issues. I never expected Sen. McCain to ignore political ethics such as Gov. Palin’s 17 year old high school teenage daughter’s pregnancy which is legitimate question in respect of Governor who has made abstinence one of her policies. I am beginning to agree the characterization that Sen. McCain judgment is questionable is not just a campaign rhetoric but real and “does not get it.”

Posted by: Liz Jacobs | September 2, 2008 4:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What is wrong with giving someone an oppturinty. Its far and i would rater give my vote to a persont that has ran a goverment for 2 years than a sen that knows how to talk. Thanks

Posted by: PInk | September 2, 2008 4:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My first reaction was raucus laughter. Then resignation to the inevitable liberal double-speak. Your reaction to a successful woman who has balanced both work and family -- and managed to deal with life's little issues such as a pregnant daughter and a special needs child (to use the PC terms you have foisted on us) -- proves that your all your posturing and defense of women is just fluff and no substance. What ever happened to feminists? Oh, I forgot -- they have to be a liberal to register on the radar. Just remember that Gov. Palin -- with all her 'faults' -- is way more appealing to middle-Americans than are latte-sipping Gucci-clinging backbiting denison of NY, DC, LA or SF who couldn't clean a spark plug on an F-150 if their lives depended on it.

Portly balding computer-wonk cat-loving Bible-thumping NRA life member... AND I VOTE!!!!

Posted by: Ypsilanti Republican | September 2, 2008 4:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What is wrong with giving someone an oppturinty. Its far and i would rater give my vote to a persont that has ran a goverment for 2 years than a sen that knows how to talk. Thanks

Posted by: PInk | September 2, 2008 4:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My thoughts, exactly.

Posted by: Theirmom | September 2, 2008 4:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The best hands-on mother in the world can find herself in Sarah Palin's position -- with a pregnant, unmarried, teen daughter. I find it insulting that you expect Americans to believe that you are qualified to speak on behalf of the women of this country. I expect that when Sarah Palin's child is sick and she is called to duty for her country, her husband will care for the child or maybe they can call on the same person that has been caring for the Obama children while Michelle has been otherwise committed. I am stunned that "motherhood" is being identified as a barrier to public office.

Posted by: Alice Phaler | September 2, 2008 4:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a shameful and cinical opinion.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008 4:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

McSame's pick is symptomatic of his snap-decision-making style....too much trouble to actually look into a situation, so pick a name from the hat and rationalize it later.

Posted by: nighthawksoars | September 2, 2008 4:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

McSame's pick is symptomatic of his snap-decision-making style....too much trouble to actually look into a situation, so pick a name from the hat and rationalize it later.

Posted by: nighthawksoars | September 2, 2008 4:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

SALLY,
Thank you for your self-revealing column. Unfortuneately, we(America) gets what we deserves.
As dangerous a choice as Palin is, this is the same electorate who chose Bush TWICE who will make the decision as`to its wisdom..
The Republicans clearly put party above country and have perfected a mewthodology to sell it to many Americans. Their prdicate now is Obama is not experienced enough( This is not so beyond reason)but that Palin is experienced enough (so far outside reason to make one pack their bags for Canada, if they succeed again.)

Posted by: James Carolan | September 2, 2008 4:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is the Washington Post using you for their agenda? Sure sounds like it. You know, you can spin all you want........however, I find Gov. Palin
a breath of fresh air.......I hope she can survive the vipers .......... and what they will put her family through........It is a shame good people
have not stepped up to the plate because how vicious Washington and the Media is........... and now comes Ms. Palin, whom I respect her accomplishments
and have no doubt she is bright, intelligent and able to be a quick study, however, worry she is tough enough to let the negative crap go by.
I, a woman voter, who previously did not know what I would do in the fall, will vote for McCain/Palin..... I pray for them and our country.

I resent how you categorize and stereotype, and insult my intelligence.

I cannot believe a so called "expert" on religion, (is that what you are?) would
print something like this....... I guess everyone has their opinion, like everyone has a nose.
Actually, reflecting on your comments.............it reminds me of the Pharisees in Jesus day......
dead bones....

Fran Boyle
Traverse City, Michigan

Posted by: Fran Boyle | September 2, 2008 4:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, with all due respect, Sarah Palin IS NOT an Evangelical. She is a Fundimentalist and it's high time you in the press understood the difference. Evangelicals are not particularly partisan and we do not think of "choice" vs. "life" as an intelligent issue upon which to base an election, especially when either side in the debate deliberately distorts facts and resorts to hysterical tantrums when anyone questions them. Evangelicals are about as likely to be Democrats and Republicans and give even more weight to issues like feeding the poor, providing necessary national health care, honesty, and providing jobs for our own people. This election cycle, based on what I see in my church, most Evangelical's will vote for Obama. Every Fundimentalist I know of will drink poison and vote for McCain. So, if you want to address the real core issue here, write about the split in the Christian church. It has gotten so polarizing that a lot of Evangelicals do not even think Fundimentalist are Chrsitian's.

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008 4:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn, go dig a hole and crawl in.

Posted by: Warren Wilson, WWII Vet | September 2, 2008 4:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The cynicism is all yours, Ms. Quinn. How disgraceful that 35 years after the beginning of the women's movement, someone like you who benefitted from it so handsomely now decides to jettison feminism and get mom back in the kitchen. My mother had 5 children and could have been a vice president of the United States with one hand tied behind her back. As for whether or not Palin is a "hands on" mother--none of your business. I know a number of very good mothers who have found their daughters in exactly the same position.

You have no right to call yourself a feminist, and you have even less right to present your own views under the guise of imagined thoughts by Evangelical women.

Posted by: Kate Domenick | September 2, 2008 4:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I saw your interview on CNN and was angered with your comments. I could not believe that a woman was attacking another for having a family and a career. Have we not gotten past this? I wanted to respond right away and then I thought maybe I should read the article. I get it; she is not a good candidate for Vice President. You were able to support your claim very well with the lack of experience. The comments on her family were unnecessary.

You disappoint me.

Posted by: Laurie | September 2, 2008 4:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I understood Mr. Palin has taken a leave from work so he can stay with the children. How many of our women Senators and Congresswomen can say the same, yet it appears they are given kudos for their choices?

Posted by: H. Cook | September 2, 2008 4:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You forgot the disclaimer: I am Barack Obama and I approved this message.

At least Palin has balanced the budgets in her town and state, thats more than Obama has done. I find it shocking that all of a sudden liberals are concerned
about experience. If your prayers get answered and McCain kicks the bucket, she can always bring up a lifer' out of the House or Senate, like Obama did.

What has happened to professional fair and non bias journalism?


D W Sparks

Posted by: D W Sparks | September 2, 2008 4:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment


They "The MSM" Say - "Nobody in there right mind would board a plane while pregnant?"

NOT TRUE - HOWEVER

Nobody with a good heart would allow their brother to live on less then $12 a year (year after year) while pulling down over $4 Million a year themselves!

Nobody who loved his country would spend twenty years around a avowed unrepentant terrorist who bombed the Capital!

Nobody in there right mind would go to a church of Hate for over twenty years!

Nobody in the right would pretend to be the Messiah!

Posted by: About Todays Attacks On Sarah | September 2, 2008 4:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You Madam, are the cynic. And a shallow one at that. Look at Gov. Palin's maverick record- The GOP now has a unified ticket of reformers. The fact that Alaska is so important to our energy supply will also be important. None of Obama's sophistry can diminish that.

McCain wins by 7% in November!

Posted by: John Duffy | September 2, 2008 4:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So the logic is that governors do not have the experience necessary to be president? What office did Slick Willy hold before he was elected?

And lets remember she is the VP candidate, not the presidential candidate.

Posted by: P | September 2, 2008 4:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I forgot to mention: disrespectful and looking down her nose at the reader. Sally cannot fathom that her readers may be more intelligent than she is, so she can follow them down the path of faulty logic without risk of being called on it. Gross miscalculation!!! An example: if Sally failed at a job she took does not mean that anybody will, and certainly does not mean that everybody will. Definitely does not mean Sarah Palin will! Learn to argue your points, Sally.

"Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil. Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well." What an incredible hypocracy coming from a democrat! Isn't that what the feminists have been fighting for? Freedom of choice? Freedom for a woman to have 5 children if she wanted to? A freedom to not be disqualified on those grounds - just as a man would not be disqualified on those grounds? CHILDREN A DISTRACTION FOR A WORKING WOMAN? Did this come from an FLDS blog? How can you disgrace yourself like that, Sally?

Posted by: Emilie | September 2, 2008 4:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ok so Mccain chose a woman for the position of VP, and it was a very strategic move. She is a white lady, with five children, who is a strong supporter of family values and is socially conservative. But to all of the woman out there, you should feel very offended by the fact that Mccain expects you to vote for her just because she's a woman. AND YES THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HE EXPECTS. When she mentioned Hillary Clinton's name in her speech, it made me want to throw up. Come on Palin, you don't hold a candle to to Hillary and her experience ( Im an Obama supporter). In reality having a 17 year old daughter who is pregnant is not a big deal and should not be a bone of contention, but Palin's situation is the exception. When your platform is based on social conservatism (family values) and you preach about abstinence, then it has to be a big deal! Especially when you cant even get your own daughter on board with you. You guys are the same people who bashed Jamie Lynn Spears, but now all of a sudden it's ok to be a 17 year old mother, and force the boyfriend to marry you! I HATE Hypocrites! And a side note to all of you who think Palin has experience, the first and ONLY time Palin set a foot out of the U.S. was when she visited the Alaskan reserves in Iraq and that was very recent. Commander in Chief, I think NOT! She is a governor of a state with only 600,000 people!

Posted by: LOSERS | September 2, 2008 4:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Smart, confident, conservative, HOT.......McCain/Palin in a landslide

Posted by: Bert Sympson | September 2, 2008 4:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find the suggestion that a woman with two small children should not accept or consider taking a demanding job to be sexist and demeaning. These charges would never be leveled against a male politician. Let us suppose for one moment that Sarah Palin had already assumed the vice presidency, and then became pregnant while in office. If Sarah Palin gave birth to a Down syndrome child while in office, would Sally Quinn demand that she resign?

Posted by: M. MacDonald | September 2, 2008 4:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Interesting thought process from a women who relates so well with deception and masterful manipulation. With each remark you could visulize the casting of a stone by a person with no sin.

Posted by: Allen | September 2, 2008 4:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a life-long Democrat myself, this column is offensive, and reveals to me the false feminism of elitism and the cynicism of the Yellow-Dog left.

I'm sure if the Governor was a Democrat, Ms. Quinn would see her story differently. I think the GOP will very quickly illustrate how wrong the author has been. Can you imagine a conservative writer saying of a Democrat, "She should stay home and take care of her kids instead of run for office,"?

Ms. Quinn so completely denigrates all of the Governor's achievements that she only gives legitimacy to the idea that Sen Obama, who had LESS experience than she in running ANYTHING, is not qualified to run for the TOP spot.

And, interestingly, isn't it Sen. Obama who is constantly quoting Bill Clinton, "The same old experience is not relevant: You can have the right kind of experience and the wrong kind of experience,"?

Isn't it Obama that says that judgment is more important than experience?

Posted by: azulu | September 2, 2008 4:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I couldn't agree more. Sarah Palin chose to have 5 children and they are her primary responsibility. She is no more a superwoman than many other high achieving women who had to make choices about career vs. family at least at some point during their lives. Clearly she is ambitious, but is she making the responsible choice given her circumstances?

I think this choice by Senator McCain says a lot about his judgement as well, which has come under attack many times depending on your political leanings. In my opinion, if he is prepared to take such a risk with the Vice Presidency, what types of risks would he take if he became President? I certainly wouldn't want to risk giving him that power and finding out when it's too late.

Posted by: Bengu Koker-Bramley | September 2, 2008 4:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well 1st off I'm a Black Male & truly believe that the Dem leadership threw Clinton under the bus in an attempt to trump the Republican's record of finding & hiring competent & qualified minorities. I think that most Whites feel a sense of relief & self gratification because here at last is an opportunity to cast off that awful White Guilt complex. It's a truly redeeming choice, a chance to say; "See! I'm not a racist, I voted for a black guy". Get over that guilt and look at the guy you're voting for... he's an unvarnished SOCIALIST! He's proposing the same remedies that any other communist/socialist regime would, and do propose, read anything about Chauvez lately? See any difference in his approach to the social ills of Venezuela? This man has absolutely nothing to recommend him for the presidency accept that he's Black, Clean & articulate. Oh yeah, and wants to redistribute the wealth in this country, so that everyone's poorer than we are now. Palin is a terrific choice and in keeping with the Republican's record of finding & hiring qualified minorities. McCain & Palin are ust what this country needs right now. This country only needs Obama if you desire to see America become another Socialist country. Am I mistaking, or was "Jesus Christ, Superstar" the theme to Barak's acceptance speech? BTW anyone who could sit for 20 years and digest the drivel that passed for religious discourse in Mr. Wrights pews is an avowed racist. I've heard this rhetoric all my life while growing up in North Philadelphia Pa. And I have seen those who subscribed to this manifesto of hate become mere disciples of racism, hate and powerlessness.... Wake up America & see this imposter for who he is.

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008 4:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sounds more like another whinning Liberal who is afraid that Gov Palin will give the Republicans the shot in the arm to come out like they did for President Bush. Articles like this infuriates woman more then anything.

Posted by: Ed | September 2, 2008 4:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

YOUR AN IDIOT...

Posted by: OWFMA | September 2, 2008 4:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm sorry Ms. Quinn doesn't get it. Palin is, apparently, qualified to be a state executive, as she has a fine record in Alaska given her tenure. All measures of "success" available attest to that assessment. And, as far as I know, Alaska is a real state and really in the United States, even though it is not within commuting distance of Washington, D.C. It is, as far as I know, bigger than Delaware with a comparable, if slightly smaller, population.

And as for family relations, a spouse's first priority is to the other spouse, and then to children, at least if we're beyond the gender stereotyping that Ms. Quinn used to, until today, decry. It seems that Alaska's "First Man" has, together with his higher-profile spouse and all their children, adjusted to the demands of public life on a large family. Sound, if not perfect, decisions.

Many Obama supporters a few days ago were trotting out Abraham Lincoln as the appropriate example: no foreigh policy experience, a little time in the state legislature, etc., but otherwise pretty naive. Where did all those arguments go? Lincoln was wise enough to see the evil of slavery even from the edge of the then-wilderness of Illinois. Perhaps Palin can clearly see the wisdom of a consistent life ethic--even when pregnancies are professionally inconvenient--when someone within the Beltway cannot. Actually living out a position even when it hurts you professionally and politically--that just might be a qualification, not an disqualification, for vice-president.

Posted by: Flying Knight | September 2, 2008 4:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You have got to be kidding me! Having children disqualifies you from office? Joe Biden was a single dad due to the tragic accident at the beginning of his Senate career - should he have stepped down? Of course not.
This article is insulting and sexist. Obama has two young girls - how can he deal with terrorism if he has to teach his girls not to be in a position to be "punished" by having a baby.
What flawed logic - you had never been on TV so you failed so Palin will fail as VP - wrong! She has been an executive at the city and State level (Obama and Biden have 0 exec experience - your analogy should apply to them, not Palin) - that is great experience - too small a state? Alaska has more complex issues than Arkansas has - it borders two countries and is has the largest land area by far of any state. By your standards the only one running on either side with direct experience is Palin.
Nice try - tell the little girl to go home and back cookies for her kids and let the men-folk handle the heavy lifting - Obama should be the one going home and back to being a "Community Organizer" - does anyone know what that is?

Posted by: Mike T | September 2, 2008 4:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Joan Trombetti,

What's truly "mind boggling" is the rose-colored lenses through which liberals and the mainstream media see themselves in their slavish pandering devotion to Obama.

With complete unintentional irony, the imbeciles dare to continue citing Palin's experience -- she who is running for VP -- while you have, AT THE TOP OF THE TICKET, a street-activist radical elitist with extremely limited experience and a voting record so reprehensible and so out-of-whack that even HE does not want to discuss it.

Not to mention his personal and/or political ties to the likes of Rezko, Ayers, and Wright. That's some record; that's some history; that's some "experience."

And this unqualified hack is running for President.

And then, you go on to say Palin is no Clinton. No indeed! For one thing, Palin made her political career on her own steam. Hillary relied entirely on Bill to move her into the spotlight.

Modern-day liberals must be just about the most ignorant blind hypocrites who ever lived. And yet they are certain they know best about everything -- even while they display the most blatant and despicable sexism against Palin, they try to assure us she's not a "real feminist."

You just keep digging the hole deeper.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 4:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow...if the left wasn't so concerned about Governor Palin, the attacks wouldn't be so personal and so vicious. How about we stick to policies differences and leave the personal attacks out of the equation.

Posted by: Karen | September 2, 2008 4:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you very much for saying what no one else seems to be willing to say. I have been amazed that no one seems willing to question the wisdom of this choice. It seems to be the proverbial "Elephant in the room."

I too have been a working mother and all my children were healthy, but to say that they were not a distraction to my career would be untrue, I know how much physical and emotional energy it took just to keep things in the family together while working.

Palin may be a remarkable person and all the good things they are saying, but the fact remains that a young family requires a lot of time and attention from both parents.

My first reaction when she was introduced was "What is she thinking?" I would like to see her come back in 4 years and see if she still believes she can fulfill the obligation of Vice President. That was before it came out that her 17yr old daughter was pregnant.

Posted by: Linda Fisher | September 2, 2008 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your comments are the best I have seen and read on the Palin-as-VEEP issue. I have worked many years with special needs children and have seen the negative consequences when parents either don't have the time or chose not to take the time to be involved. The kids have more problems reaching their potential. These kids take time--quantity and quality from both parents and the extended family as well.

I have a child who had a "whoops" baby and as the grandmother, I have needed to be there to support and encourage and teach as my own youngster learned to parent. Just can't figure out how one can spend the hours and stress of the VP of the US position and do a decent job with not one, but now two, children with special needs. Palin may be a compassionate conservative, but she sure seems more personally ambitious than family oriented.

Posted by: Caryl | September 2, 2008 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am not voting for McCain/Palin because of her gender. I am voting for them because of their stance on the issues. Ms. Palin is an incredible leader and talented person. She would make an awesome President if something were to happen to John McCain while in office. Stop making this out to be a gender driven choice. I don't care if they're male, female, green, black, white or any other color. It's who they are as a person. Get over the other crap. Paul

Posted by: Paul | September 2, 2008 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find the suggestion that a woman with two small children should not accept or consider a demanding job to be sexist and demeaning. These charges would never be leveled against a male politician.

Posted by: M. MacDonald | September 2, 2008 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you, Ms Quinn, for having the courage to touch the third rail of feminism. We can't do it all all the time and take care of ourselves and our children. We must begin this conversation.

Posted by: Virginia Yasin | September 2, 2008 3:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy."

and she still is more qualified than Obama!!!

Posted by: smithncustom | September 2, 2008 3:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well stated and balanced article. The only way someone could criticize the analysis is if they checked their brain at the door.

Posted by: Ted | September 2, 2008 3:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am not voting for McCain/Palin because of her gender. I am voting for them because of their stance on the issues. Ms. Palin is an incredible leader and talented person. She would make an awesome President if something were to happen to John McCain while in office. Stop making this out to be a gender friven choice. I don't care if they're male, female, green, black, white or any other color. It's who they are as a person. Get over the other crap. Paul

Posted by: Paul | September 2, 2008 3:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you very much for saying what no one else seems to be willing to say. I have been amazed that no one seems willing to question the wisdom of this choice. It seems to be the proverbial "Elephant in the room."

I too have been a working mother and all my children were healthy, but to say that they were not a distraction to my career would be untrue, I know how much physical and emotional energy it took just to keep things in the family together while working.

Palin may be a remarkable person and all the good things they are saying, but the fact remains that a young family requires a lot of time and attention from both parents.

My first reaction when she was introduced was "What is she thinking?" I would like to see her come back in 4 years and see if she still believes she can fulfill the obligation of Vice President. That was before it came out that her 17yr old daughter was pregnant.

Posted by: Linda Fisher | September 2, 2008 3:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you, Ms Quinn, for having the courage to touch the third rail of feminism. We can't do it all all the time and take care of ourselves and our children. We must begin this conversation.

Posted by: Virginia Yasin | September 2, 2008 3:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am surprised to find such a sexist article written by a supposed "professional" journalist. To assume Palin can't do the job because she is a mom is offensive. To suggest that she is a bad mom because one of her children got pregnant is ridiculous.

Likewise, in your ignorance you equate "evangelical" to "Southern Baptist" as if evangelicals are a monolithic voting block. Not to mention you misrepresent the evangelical view of women.

It is interesting to note that more women seem to be put off by Palin's selection than men. I think the distain of liberal women toward conservative women is rearing its ugly head. I just wish people who are supposed to be professional journalists would stop the tabloid journalism when it comes to Palin.

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 3:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Her first priority has to be her children."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Democrat nominee has children as well. Isn't he going to be burdened with raising his children?

Since when has this become a factor?

Ah.... It's a double standard. I get it.

You writers need to do some critical thinking before you print this stuff.

Posted by: Cdr. Vimes | September 2, 2008 3:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, as a mother of a special needs child who has been additionally trained to work with with Down’s syndrome and autistic children within the public school system as a teacher’s aid, I don’t agree with you that Palin’s special needs child will be a distraction as Vice President. As you well know, it takes enormous resources to raise and educate a special needs child. I believe that Palin will have less distraction as Vice President with the first-rate Down’s syndrome schools and education support available within the Washington DC area. As for her daughter, I just sent my own daughter off to college with a prayer that she was actually listened to me all these years. Every mother wants the best for her children; I believe Palin, by accepting the nomination of Vice President, is doing the best for her children.

Posted by: Victoria | September 2, 2008 3:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a silly little old woman you've become. You've forgotten how life is as you rotate in and out of your four mansions, haven't you, Sally?

Too bad about this terrible article, Sally, old girl; now you have to live with it.

BTW, while you're running to your bed crying, I suggest you apologize to the people you've insulted...again, like us working people.

You and your friends are incorrigible, and distinctly silly--just silly little people.

You should be embarrassed at your lack of understanding and humility, Sally. What a sad thing to watch a "Has Been" grow old and weirder.

Did you have Ben edit and proof this thing? You should have.

Andsie

Posted by: Andsie | September 2, 2008 3:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I would love to have seen a woman on the ticket.

Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Condi Rice, for example were MUCH better selections. Instead we have an unvetted Gov from Alaska (jeez!), who is under investigation for abuse of power, a Down Syndrome infant, who the rumor mill claims is really her grandchild, a 17 year old promiscuous, pregnant daughter, who missed 5 months of school this past year being treated for MONO ( get real!)

Pays to be a card carrying member of the NRA when you have to have a shotgun wedding!

Spin it anyway you want - THIS WAS A BAD PICK and the press that this is getting is much to much of a distraction. MCcAIN had my vote in the bag until this senseless attempt to pander to the evangels. I am back to square one seeking the lesser of two evil! Thanks MAV!

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 2, 2008 3:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am surprised to find such a sexist article written by a supposed "professional" journalist. To assume Palin can't do the job because she is a mom is offensive. To suggest that she is a bad mom because one of her children got pregnant is ridiculous.

Likewise, in your ignorance you equate "evangelical" to "Southern Baptist" as if evangelicals are a monolithic voting block. Not to mention you misrepresent the evangelical view of women.

It is interesting to note that more women seem to be put off by Palin's selection than men. I think the distain of liberal women toward conservative women is rearing its ugly head. I just wish people who are supposed to be professional journalists would stop the tabloid journalism when it comes to Palin.

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 3:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just because she has a daughter who is pregnant, why would you automatically assume that religious people wouldn't support her? Big city liberals don't understand religious people in the least in this country. Every time you put keystroke to monitor, something utterly insane comes out. My mom had a child when she was 16....they then had me when she was 18...they raised a beautiful catholic family of 8 kids who are all productive members of society-not wealthy by any means, but members in good standing. I'm doing okay, too. I am not as religious as they are, My parents are very religious, and while they started off maybe unplanned, their faith in family, and their family's support made it possible for them to make it. These faithful people, like Sarah Palin, understand that, and while it seems apparent that many liberals such as yourself see conservatives as willing to throw the sinners over the city walls, that is just not how it works. YOUR cyncism is what is appalling. That is what many of these heartland people think, and as much as you wish to demonize people who live by faith, they are not the ones who are now trying to ruin this young girl's life by blaming her mother for her missteps. People of faith love their families, and I am sure the Palin's will do everything they can to surround Bristol with love to assist her with this too early responsibility. How dreadful that so many of you supposedly enlightened liberals would be unwilling to do the same.

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Her family situation aside--this woman is not qualified to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. She recently stated about the Iraq war "I haven't ever thought about it much".

She was the mayor of a town of 7000--there were more people in my high school. She has been the Gov of AK--pop 556,000--for 18 mos. The Alaskan legislature convenes once every 9 months. So, she has presided over them twice.

The state is rolling in money--she doesn't have to balance the budget--she has to find ways to spend the money. Also, the town of Wasilla, where she was mayor, received 27 million in earmarks from the federal gov't. Also, before she was against the "bridge to nowhere", she was for it . And when the project was scrapped, she kept the money from the federal gov't for the project. Her husband works for BP--she's in the pocket of big oil--Alaska always was. I thought we were trying to change that?

For you Hillary voters out there--does the fact that she has ovaries do it for you? Her policies and beliefs are the polar opposite of Hillary--so, just any woman will do?

This is the most reckless and irresponsible decision made by any presidential candidate in my lifetime--and I'm old. John McCain says "Country first" and accuses Barack Obama of doing anything to win an election? I say the truth is quite the opposite.

Posted by: judy | September 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

her daughter is a senior in high school. if her mother wins the election, will she finish school in alaska away from her family in wash dc, away from the "loving support" of her family. will she be left with others to finish school>? will she be away from her family in dc when she has the child? if she moves to dc to be with her family, does that mean the father has to leave his school also, leave his family and friends to be with the mother in dc?
hopefully for the country and for this family, the best qualified candidate, barak obama will win the election and this whole family will move back to alaska to sort out this whole sordid mess.

Posted by: claire | September 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sen. McCain's choice of Gov. Palin fully flushes out the hypocrisy of the feminists. Now who wants to keep the "glass ceiling" in place?

Posted by: Greg | September 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

to whoever said that pregnancy can happen in any family, no matter how hands on, you have missed the point. This is not about a hands-on mother. This is about a judgmental woman whose own witness did not prevent her daughter from having sex before marriage. Evangelicals judge us all, but they want us to look the other way when their own values are shattered to bits. They want us to know them as 'flawed' or 'not perfect', but they want us to know we are all going to hell because we do things they find immoral, or if we do not take Jesus to be our lord and savior. I love how believing in Jesus is a free pass to bad conduct.

Posted by: Becky | September 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Damn good article and speaks to the heart of the matter and also makes one question John McCain's ability to make sound judgement. Perhaps, we should have him assessed and evaulated to determine if he is in fact suffering from both dementia as well as Alzheimer's(at times, he appears confused). Although, I am a Barack Obama supporter without question, I am still concerned in the event my candidate does not win. It appears McCain has decided to play chess with the lives of the people in this country by selecting Palin as his VP nominee and now leaves me suspect that indeed he is really the person who wants to win by any means necessary.

Posted by: A. Cross | September 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm surprised at the number of right wingers who will jump blindly in to support this pick. I guess I really shouldn't be all that surprised, they would jump right in to attack Obama if he had made a similar unqualified pick...good thing he didn't.

Oh and to Joe who can't seem to find anything that Obama has done that equals all the extensive things that Sara Palin has accomplished in her exceptional 18 months as governor....it's called Google, try using it sometime for something other than looking up porn.

Posted by: taddles | September 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is what some people consider journalism today? Amazing.

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 3:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I just saw part of your interview on CNN, which led me to this article.

You say that a woman's first responsibility is to her children, and you present your decision to take a leave of absence as a model of what should be done if someone (actually, just the mother---fathers seem to get a pass) has a special needs child. What gives you the right to impose your decision on everyone else?

Do you realize that you have basically condemned ALL chid-bearing-age women to an "also-ran" status in all fields? After all, how can one have any woman in a responsible position? She might give birth to a child with special needs, at which time, according to you, she will be distracted by the child to such an extent as to be unable to perform her job.

Somehow you think that, while a mother would be distracted (a word that you seem to be overly fond of using on camera), a father with the same problem would not be. As a man, I find that grossly insulting.

As best as I can tell, the people who are "distracted" by this story seem to belong primarily to the media, that, perhaps because of the demands of 24-hour news stations, would rather focus on such easy irrelevancies, and not address issues of real substance.

Posted by: bearspa | September 2, 2008 3:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hi Sally,

First, I want you to know where I'm coming from: I strongly support Barack Obama for president. So even though I want to see the McCain/Palin campaign sink like a rock, I have to say the mainstream media's focus on the Palin family's babies is revolting and counterproductive. It wastes valuable energy, and itg has served to rally conservatives -- just as the NY Times' ill-considered story did about McCain's supposed affair with a lobbyist.

America doesn't need its journalists to devote precious time and resources on such melodrama! Rome is burning -- in fact, here and around there world, dozens of Romes are in full conflagration. You, and every other responsible reporter, need to stop rationalizing your Attention Deficit Disorder.

Perhaps you've noticed that contrary to the very first sentence in your article, support for McCain among values voters is soaring! And it's precisely because of the attention the news media.

I'm sure you and your colleagues have plenty of justifications for focusing on this story. But remember the greatest mistake of the Bush team was to become stuck in a rationalization bubble, one that no outside logic could pierce.

For the sake of what's at stake in this election, please get off of this story!

Posted by: Jeff Smith | September 2, 2008 3:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally QUinn

Your column is distressing to me as a woman, as an executive, and as a mother -- not to mention the fact that I am part of that evangelical base that you think you know.

Sarah Palin is qualified to be Vice President because of her executive experience and her tough stance on issues that really matter. I spent more than 30 years as an executive in a major food company and I know what it means to work in a high powered job and raise a family and juggle it all at once. I did it and my kids are greatful for the quality attention I gave them even though I was working hard and rising to the top.

Shame on you for thinking a woman can't do it!

And by the way, I know you are the "faith" writer at the WP, but you don't understand evangelicals at all. You don't have a clue as to what makes us think and act and what motivations drive us.

Instead of saying what you think we will do or feel, why don't you ask some of us?

Kaeporter

Posted by: Kaeporter | September 2, 2008 3:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The Christian social conservatives politicized the personal long ago! Among other things, Palin wants to change policies and laws that affect our personal choices and behaviors.

The tragedy about the Sarah Palins in our society and government isn't that "We can't control what our children do," it's that they absolutely want to control what my children do.

The lesson that free-thinking humans should take from the Palin morality play is this: It is always the worst offenders who despise us for their failings and mistakes.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 3:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ok so McCain picked a woman for the position of V.P., and he made a very strategic decision. She is a white woman, with five children, and with supposed strong family values. But to all you woman out there you should feel very offended by the fact that Mccain expects you to vote for him just because she's a woman. When she mentioned Hillary Clinton in her speech, it made me want to throw up. When it comes to Clinton you don't hold a candle to her accomplishments (I'm an Obama supporter). Having a pregnant teen is really not a big deal and shouldn't be a bone of contention, but Palin's case is the exception. When your platform is based on social conservatism (family values) and preach about abstinence, how can you substantiate those points when you can't even get your own daughter to agree with you? You people are the same people who bash girls like Jamie Lynn Spears, but now all of a sudden it's ok to be pregnant at 17, and force the boyfriend into marriage. Oh, how I can't stand hypocrites. And a little note to all of those who think she's experienced, do you all know that Palin's only experience outside of the U.S. was a visit to the Alaskan reserves in Iraq, which was very recent. Commander in Chief, I think NOT! She is a governor of a state with only 600,000 people!

Posted by: WOW | September 2, 2008 3:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I just find it interesting that the media keep comparing Palin to Obama. Shouldn't they be comparing her to Biden? She is the vp candidate, not the presidential candidate.

Posted by: optionyout | September 2, 2008 3:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The last time I rediscovered Sally Quinn was when she gave an astute analysis of Reverend Wright's flare up concerning his comments about America and it's history. Once again Ms Quinn has addressed the issue head on and absolutely correctly regarding Governor Palin's readiness and appropriateness to run with Senator McCain for President and Vice-President. I wholeheartedly agree that Palin IS running for the top spot and that she too is bringing heavy baggage to the ticket, a criticism of Senator Clinton, should she have been the nominee. Not only is she having to deal with her family drama in public, but has she considered the effect it will have on all her children? Did McCain? Judgment matters, and bad judgment is dangerous. These preoccupying personal issues are not the only problems I have with her. Her conservative, anti-women attitudes, as well as her taking pork barrel monies for the bridge to nowhere while a mayor and claiming to be a reformer is insulting. Go Sally, you are POLITICALLY CORRECT because you tell it like it is.

Posted by: Tesa Mae Chavez | September 2, 2008 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn finds the pick of Sarah Palin as insulting to the Republican Party. Since when did she ever give a damn about the Republican Party?

Posted by: scott hollenbeck | September 2, 2008 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Keep up the good work leftist columnists.
you just made me definitely decide to vote for McCain.

Posted by: Rodney Matthieu | September 2, 2008 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why is it that when Drudge Report posts a link to a story the comment section IQ seems to dip? Anyone else notice?

Posted by: me | September 2, 2008 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You guys just dont get it do you

Posted by: mhj | September 2, 2008 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Based upon your confession, the suggestion that Sarah Palin was picked because she is a woman strikes me as being a little self-indulgent in your thinking. McCain picked her to soldify the conservative base and to highlight the energy issue as #1 in the 2008 campaign. No other candidate on the short list provided him the 2-fold advantage.

To suggest she is not experienced enough to handle the Vice Presidency only highlights Obama's lesser experience.

Posted by: Scott | September 2, 2008 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Because you were not ready must mean that Palin is not ready. Using your logic and personal experience no woman is ready to be President, VP, Governor, Mayor, council person, or even on the PTA.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hateful. Ignorant. Distorting truth and logic without shame. True democrat.

Posted by: Emilie | September 2, 2008 3:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn: your an idiot

Posted by: Cory Di Geronimo | September 2, 2008 3:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hi Sally,

You talk about Sara Pallin as not being qualified for the Vice Presidency. Can you please do an article on what the difference in qualification between Barack Obama and Sara Palin. I have been doing a lot of research on Barack but I can not find any information on why he is qualified on National security. Am I missing something?

Please help me understand.

thanks

Joe

Posted by: Joe N, | September 2, 2008 3:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, I just saw your interview on CNN and wanted to tell you how much I appreciated hearing you say all the things that I've been thinking. Having now read your entire article, the only thing I think you failed to mention is the alarming appearance of McCain using the Bush style of making quick decisions based on "gut feelings" instead of evidence. I pray God will save us from more of that kind of leadership. BN

Posted by: Barbara Nesom | September 2, 2008 3:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

hmmm, and this particular column is not cynical?

Posted by: anon | September 2, 2008 3:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The hypocrisy and condescension expressed in this article are not only breathtaking, they are unworthy of Kay Graham's life and legacy in the Washington Post. Perhaps you should return to your gossip column.

Posted by: mamacita | September 2, 2008 3:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

First: "Now, with news that Palin's 17-year-old unmarried daughter is pregnant, McCain's pick may not even find support among "family values" voters."

The difference between conservatives and liberals in America today is that conservatives at least HAVE standards, which, because they are fallible human beings, they sometimes fall short of. When they do, they accept responsibility, ask for and receive forgiveness. Unfortunately, liberals simply have no standards, which is a corollary of relativism.


Second: "And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?"

There is a great chasm of difference between a person with executive experience and someone who
has simply taken direction all their lives.

Obama is someone who has been a community organizer--whatever that means--,a junior senator who has voted "present" 143 times, who has introduced no significant legislative iniatives, who has never reached across the isle to take a tough, unpopular stand on important issues, who was in charge of an inconsequential senate committee, which he chaired but never called to meet.

Palin has been a governor. Even McCain had significant executive experience in the Navy. These are positions where your decisions and JUDGMENT actually impinge on people's lives in sometimes mortal ways.

The last senator elected president was JFK. There is a good reason for this.

Posted by: Carlton Austin | September 2, 2008 3:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is amazing that many of you are arguing that abstinence-only education has been proven a failure because one girl whose mother supports such education got pregnant. How many girls have gotten pregnant since sex-education has been introduced to the schools en masse? PLENTY! Your arguments seem to imply that not a single girl has gotten pregant since sex-education has been imposed. If abstinence only-education is a failure because one girl got pregant, how much more has sex-education in general been a failure because many, many girls have gotten pregnant! Your arguments to the contrary are extremely inconsistent, but hey, that's not surprising, coming from the left!

Posted by: Kathy P | September 2, 2008 3:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article begins with a laughable assertion: that candidates should (and apparently in Quinn's mind DO) not select vice presidential candidates for the purpose of winning votes. One need only look at who Ms. Quinn's beloved Sen. Obama to see the same "cynical" politicking of selecting a vice presidential candidate to win over a certain demographic. Barack knew that there were older white men that were generally liberal and blue-collar that did not trust his experience credentials, especially in foreign affairs. Thus, he picked an older white male with a foreign affairs record.

A popular counter-argument is that McCain could have picked Kay Bailey-Hutchinson from Texas. McCain's campaign shrewdly recognized that it'd need someone to electrify the campaign and bring attention to his candidacy, which to this point has been sorely lacking. The Texas Senator would have protracted the snooze-fest that has thus far embodied the McCain campaign. McCain made a choice that would help win him the election, as ALL presidential candidates (including the magical Barack Obama) do. The fact that Sen. Obama has received a strikingly mediocre post-convention bump, despite the 80,000-strong sideshow in Denver, reflects the impact of McCain's choice.

Posted by: Anon | September 2, 2008 3:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your entire piece is voided due to Obama's ZERO experience. You sound like a DNC puppet.

Posted by: evilc | September 2, 2008 3:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am surprised to find such a sexist article written by a supposed "professional" journalist. To assume Palin can't do the job because she is a mom is offensive. To suggest that she is a bad mom because one of her children got pregnant is ridiculous.

Likewise, in your ignorance you equate "evangelical" to "Southern Baptist" as if evangelicals are a monolithic voting block. Not to mention you misrepresent the evangelical view of women.

It is interesting to note that more women seem to be put off by Palin's selection than men. I think the distain of liberal women toward conservative women is rearing its ugly head. I just wish people who are supposed to be professional journalists would stop the tabloid journalism when it comes to Palin.

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 3:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Funny this whiner doesn't mention how Obama uses his half-black racial background to do well in the election or how Hillary tried using her gender as well. I guess only Republicans make tactical decisions to win a presidency and that is just horrible.

Posted by: Brandy | September 2, 2008 3:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hmmmm, Mother who supports her unwed, pregnant teen or Man who supports infanticide.... what's an Evangelical to do?

Posted by: chuck | September 2, 2008 3:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you for articulating this problem so well. I could not agree more. What is this woman thinking? It appears she's thinking with her personal ego and ambition, not as a loving mother. What angers me MOST is that Sarah Palin stepped into this arena knowing full well her daughter's pregnancy would become fodder for international media. I can't imagine poor Palin is enjoying a second of this, especially now that her self-described "redneck"
boyfriend's My Space page has been announced to the world, only adding to any mother's concern about this poor teenaged girl. And are we talking "shotgun wedding"? Just how backwoods are we talking? And what kind of role modeling is that for the women of the world?

Posted by: Kathryn | September 2, 2008 3:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms.Quinn:

You couldn't be more wrong. Let me spell that out for you since you have a "deficiency" in writing a reasoned perspective: WRONG. The Palin VP choice has made it so much more abundantly clear of the hypocracy flowing within the feminist movement. On the one hand they demand that: Women can have it all, but when that woman is a highly successful conservative, oops, she should stay "at home" and take care of her children. Pathetic. Please, Ms.Quinn, give us some substance that can be debated. Let's see
"political gimmick", Barrack has been the worst offender of all the candidates todate given the great "visit to Europe" act. Finally, If you lefty's want to go after the conservative "offspring", why not take on the Biden Brood and all their "clean slates", Shall we. I believe one had been quite successful off "Daddy's" getting government contracts for the company he works for. BUT, does the MSM touch that one. No, they would rather attack a 17 year mother to be. Quite classy, don't you think !

Posted by: Dave from Georgia | September 2, 2008 3:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are so right Sally but you missed something BIG, not only did one of Palin's daughters have sex but one of her four year old boys once pissed into the wind by accident while on a camping trip in the woods!
Today I hear with panted breath on the so called "News Media" on almost every channel that the Gov of Alaska actually got on a PLANE once too!!!!!

Holly Hanna - Crazy Keith O at MSNBC and the kooks on the daily kos will be foaming at the mouth until after the election about that!

PS - No word on the Obama / Ayers documents yet though huh.
MSM "Nothing to see there just move along."

You people are sick!

Posted by: I Agree Sally | September 2, 2008 3:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are such a hypocrite. McCain can't win for losing! It's obvious that you have an agenda.

Posted by: D. R. Trevino | September 2, 2008 3:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I couldnt have said it better myself - its a cynical, calculated move, and anyone who doesn't view it as such is being wilfully ignorant.

Posted by: dave | September 2, 2008 3:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn: Nice try, even with your attempt to show your poor career choice as a benchmark to rate Gov. Palin aginst, but your diatribe does not work. Please check your facts regarding the full scope of her offices held and the documented accomplishments of this woman before you try and denegrate her in future tomes. And before you write your final draft, draw a line down the paper and on the otehr side just try and list the stealth accomplishments of Barack Obama. Here's a question: if I decide I'm going to run for President and talk about it for two years and totally neglect the job I'm being paid to do by the taxpayers representing the state of Illinois, does that qualify me to be President? That's Obama's resume for the last two years.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 3:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your words have meaning not only for Sarah
Palin but more so for Barack Obama.
He wants to become President.
The lack of experience he possesses should
make every American open their eyes a little more.
Voting since the 60s, a Politician's
mantra has been, is, and will be to outpromise
your opponent. That is what Politicians do.
But promises are like
the morning dew that hugs the grass but
soon disappears from the light and heat of the
sun.

Posted by: Ron McGinnis | September 2, 2008 3:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment


I wasnt going to vote for Obama anyway. But, I wasnt too pleased with McCain and had decided maybe not to vote at all.
But, with all the left wing news media praising Obama and treating him like the Mesiah, I decided I will deffinitely vote for McCain. One thing many folks dont like is for newspapers to jump in the tank for a particular candidate. I have never seen it this bad.
So, thanks to all you leftie columnists, you have helped me decide to vote.

Posted by: Rodney Matthieu | September 2, 2008 3:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally: I caught the tail end of your interview with Soledad O'Brien on CNN. I think Soledad was too tough on you. I applaud you for taking the stance that Palin needs to be home. The needs of her family are crucial and her family needs her more than the country. Family First. I am a mother of 3 teens and I cut back on my career 8 years ago. I, for one, think we Moms make the mistake of being there for our children when they are just born until they start pre-school and neglect the later years. I think being there for pre-teens and teens are just as important. I gave up my full-time job when my oldest started middle-school. Life was smooth and my children were doing well but I just recognized the importance of being present in the later years. I have 3 teens and my oldest is a sophomore and my middle child will start college this Sept. My youngest will follow suit. I sacrificed, but I think it was beneficial. I'm 43 with many years remaining--by the grace of God--to build a career.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 3:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

To feign outrage that McCain chose a women veep is pathetic & should be in itself insulting to women.

Fact: Obama has less executive experience than Palin, and is arguably less qualified to lead (at any level) than her. Should African- Americans therefore be insulted that the Democratic Party chose him as their candidate for President?

The fact that Palin is not an over- exposed Washington insider like her plagiarizing, has- been, counterpart, does not disqualify her from being a viable candidate for Vice President. In fact, I and many others see her as the welcomed "change" that the other side has been preaching.

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008 3:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,

Just saw you on CNN...your ignorance regarding the Christian / evangelical base really showed itself.

Evangelicals are not limited to the Baptist denomination - and there are Baptist denominations that have female pastors!

Evangelical/Christian women are not made to stay at home in the kitchen - That was the funniest of your lies.

I have been an independant up till now. The sad thing is, it's not Obama that has lost me (though his willingness to distort and stretch the truth into something else has also been obvious) so much as the liberal media and the lengths that democrats have gone to to trash anyone not of their view and agenda.

The thing is, in a nutshell, your concern about Palin being distracted by her children in such a high position could have carried some recongnition if sold solo...but you had to wrap it up in false information in order to sell it...do you think the world or even your readers are as ignorant as you?...Actually, your readers, sadily, are probably much like you are - bitter and hell bent to see your liberal agenda promoted rather than integrity and balanced information.

Now that you've cast such a stone...care to share what's in your glass house?

Posted by: Leslie Ford | September 2, 2008 3:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
Thank you for bringing your intelligent and sane view point to the Palin issue. As you know, "When emotion goes up, intelligence goes down." Palin has clearly demonstrated that she can raise the emotions of women voters. This is just what the McCain folks were counting on to happen as a means of distracting voters from the real issues that face this country, both at home and abroad. To
meet with someone face to face for the first time on Thursday
and then offer them the job of VP a few minutes in to the meeting is pure insanity. Neither McCain nor Palin have the ability to lead this country. McCain may be 72 years old but he has demonstrated major immaturity with his "Shock and Awe" choice of VP.
FE

Posted by: Fay Evans | September 2, 2008 3:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Palin were a man and had a special needs child would we be saying the same things about him? NO, is Mr. Pallin such an abviously bad parent that he can't be with the children while she works, love that double standard!

As for experience I think McCain should state very clearly that the way to avoid having an inexperienced President is for McCain to live and for Obama not to be elected. I'm sure McCain will do his part, hopefully the American People will do theirs...

Posted by: Eric | September 2, 2008 3:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

McCain just doesn't get it -- nor does anyone who is on his side. How can they (who look at this choice for VP as a positive - with a straight face) think for a second that Palin is qualified to be second in command? She is no Hillary Clinton!! Please -- let's really think about this. Logistically, Palin spells disaster for this country -- or at the very least -- disaster for her family. It's mind boggling - it truly is. Real feminists --dead or alive- are shaking their heads in disbelief - trust me.

Posted by: Joan Trombetti | September 2, 2008 3:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gee, the last congressman to win a presidential race was John F. Kennedy. All the rest have been governors of a state, former VP or both. Seems like being governor of a state trumps being a congressman when it comes to being elected president.

Posted by: Myowngrandpaw | September 2, 2008 3:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you Ms. Quinn for showing your ass and telling every conservative in this country that John McCain made the RIGHT choice in Gov. Palin! America will rally to her side and shun you haters!

Posted by: Brian Ross | September 2, 2008 3:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with Sally Quinn and am personally disgusted with the choice of Mrs. Palin for vice-president.

Posted by: Phyllis H, Johnson | September 2, 2008 3:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Kudos Sally! Your comments are right on point. Sara Palin a) lacks the experience to be the VP pick b) She has come to the table with way more baggage than the GOP even could imagine. No way this woman was properly vetted! b) She came to US with her family problems, so how can she and the GOP now want a hands off approach with her? You cant have it both ways. Preaching family values, abstinence, etc., then have a 17 yr old pregnant daughter? Obviously her plate is already full, as Bristol sure had a lot of free time to get knocked up? She returned to work 3 days after giving birth to a Downs Syndrome baby. Most mothers of healthy babies dont want to return even after 3 weeks! Either her motherly instincts are out of touch or she simply doesnt practice the family values that she preaches about. Many women can have it all, career and family. However as a woman who attempted to do just that, I cant begin to deny that to a great extent, my family took a backseat or were cared for by hired help. THAT is not what the conservatives view as proper mothering.

This will be very interesting, as unlike what the GOP hopes, this isnt going away. In fact I fear that more dirty laundry will bear its ugly head in the coming days. I would love to see a woman on the ticket. I do personally believe that THIS woman just isnt the RIGHT one. I cant simply throw my vote at someone for gender purposes. McCain simply DID NOT pick the right candidate. Plain and Simple.

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 2, 2008 3:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are sillier than you are biased. Good luck with your astute lack of awareness.

Posted by: John R. | September 2, 2008 3:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I could never vote for palin. And I am a woman.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 3:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think you are very hypocritical. As a woman who is a Republican and is pro-choice I am HIGHLY OFFENDED by your article. You state women must be subservient because of the number of children they have. Tell me, what would you consider a fair number of children and still allow you to become a leader? I guess any parent that has at least five children(one who is actually an adult)and has a child with special needs should be a stay at home mom-definately not work in the entertainment field like Angelina Jolie or be an executive in a company because we all know they have great working hours. You say you are a parent. Well I teach teenagers and have two of my own and if you are really around for YOUR children you would know that a parent can't be around 24/7 to monitor everything their child does. As far as the religion issue Govenor Palin made a choice to be a working mom. Don't dictate what she can and cannot do if you are NOT a part of her religion. In the Orthodox Jewish religion women are NOT allowed to be Rabbis and have many religious restictions solely for the fact that they are women yet a number of them have made it in the working world and are successful leaders.
I think you OWE all of us an apology and should take a deep look at what interior motive you had for writing this article.

Posted by: Elise Czerniak | September 2, 2008 3:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think you are very hypocritical. As a woman who is a Republican and is pro-choice I am HIGHLY OFFENDED by your article. You state women must be subservient because of the number of children they have. Tell me, what would you consider a fair number of children and still allow you to become a leader? I guess any parent that has at least five children(one who is actually an adult)and has a child with special needs should be a stay at home mom-definately not work in the entertainment field like Angelina Jolie or be an executive in a company because we all know they have great working hours. You say you are a parent. Well I teach teenagers and have two of my own and if you are really around for YOUR children you would know that a parent can't be around 24/7 to monitor everything their child does. As far as the religion issue Govenor Palin made a choice to be a working mom. Don't dictate what she can and cannot do if you are NOT a part of her religion. In the Orthodox Jewish religion women are NOT allowed to be Rabbis and have many religious restictions solely for the fact that they are women yet a number of them have made it in the working world and are successful leaders.
I think you OWE all of us an apology and should take a deep look at what interior motive you had for writing this article.

Posted by: Elise Cooper | September 2, 2008 3:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you Sally for speaking the truth, no matter how unpopular. I consider myself a feminist, but chose to stay home with my children while they were young even though money was tight. (We only had one car for years.) I was ridiculed by my feminist friends for my choice, but I have never regretted it. I have a wonderful career now (I'm 57 years old). My daughter graduated from Yale and my son from the University of Miami. Both are outstanding young people with good careers and good values. I believe the time I spent with them at home helped them become the people they are today. Parenthood is not a part-time job.

Posted by: Margie Hill | September 2, 2008 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, why no mention of the fact that Sarah Palin has a supportive husband? He is, by all accounts, a loving husband and father. Yes, she is a mother of five and has a special needs infant, but her children also have a father to guide them--and my bet is that he is willing and able to step up to the plate. Real feminists will see right through your insecurity. McCain/Palin get my vote.

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There are five children in the Palin family. Three of the five will add unusual levels of stress to the life of the family: a son at war, a teen who is pregnant, an infant who has special needs.

A mother OR FATHER in such a family, who chooses to take a position, any position, that requires a more than full time commitment of time and energy is fooling her or his self if he or she thinks the family and/or the job is not going to suffer serious consequences.

Posted by: Pastor | September 2, 2008 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Folks,

Palin is not running against Obama. McCain is. Silly to compare a VP nominee to the Presidential nominee.

McCain rounded out his ticket with a hyper-Christian, just as Obama rounded his out with Biden for foreign policy.

Palin matched up with everything on McCain's "What I'm missing" checklist. (Especially pro-family; but let's keep her growing family out.)

What we need to keep in mind is that McCain has secured a ticket and possible administration which will be identical to Bush-Cheney. And with the direction Bush-Cheney's has been going in, it will be worse.

God help us if McCain actually pulls this off.

Posted by: REG | September 2, 2008 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

More smug poop-throwing from the DC elite. Palin has courage and determination, much of which is west of the elites of the east coast. Enough BS already,

Posted by: jtpisko@gmail.com | September 2, 2008 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

More smug poop-throwing from the DC elite. Palin has courage and determination, much of which is west of the elites of the east coast. Enough BS already,

Posted by: jtpisko@gmail.com | September 2, 2008 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just because you weren’t able to rise to the occasion when given a position don’t assume others can’t. Life provides people difficult challenges everyday; but that is when we find out what people are truly made of. Some of our greatest presidents had little experience; Abraham Lincoln (1 term in congress), while others with lots of experience and turned out terrible – see Richard Nixon for example.

People said Ronald Reagan was just an actor pretending to be President, people said Bill Clinton and JFK were too young, and again, all great Presidents.

Second. I find it offensive that when a women runs for elected office she is subjected to comments about not being able to be a mother and politician. Has anyone ever suggested previous male vice presidents might not being able to be both fathers and politicians? There is a clear double standard here. This suggests Palin’s husband is not capable of lifting a heavier parental load during Sarah’s call to service for our great country. We live in the 21st century, surely men can step up here when women have powerful careers, and they do.

On the question of Palin vs Obama's experience, it’s not even close – as a Governor and Mayor, Sarah Palin has more executive experience and a clear tangible record of change. From balancing budgets, ethics reform, taxing big oil companies and giving Alaskan’s rebates, commander of the National Guard, in process of building 40 billion dollar natural gas pipeline for energy independence, and this is in her first two years as Governor. Compared to Obama who is a community organizer and has spent nearly as much time campaigning for president than working in congress – and no record of change to speak of beyond soaring rhetoric. Palin’s record is pretty impressive on her own and considering she is #2 on Republican ticket and Barack is #1 on Democrat ticket, Dem’s don’t have a leg to stand on challenging her experience.

And on the question of Palin’s daughter, I think people should heed both Laura Bush and Obama’s advice and back off. Pregnancy can happen in ANY family regardless of how hands-on a parent is. I think you will find that when the dust settles this story line and negative criticism will backfire, and the American heart will sympathize with Palin and her family. We had enough of media sexism and criticism with the Hilary Clinton campaign and people have had enough.

I am a male registered democrat.

Best,

Aaron
Los Angeles, CA

Posted by: Aaron | September 2, 2008 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Kudos Sally! Your comments are right on point. Sara Palin a) lacks the experience to be the VP pick b) She has come to the table with way more baggage than the GOP even could imagine. No way this woman was properly vetted! b) She came to US with her family problems, so how can she and the GOP now want a hands off approach with her? You cant have it both ways. Preaching family values, abstinence, etc., then have a 17 yr old pregnant daughter? Obviously her plate is already full, as Bristol sure had a lot of free time to get knocked up? She returned to work 3 days after giving birth to a Downs Syndrome baby. Most mothers of healthy babies dont want to return even after 3 weeks! Either her motherly instincts are out of touch or she simply doesnt practice the family values that she preaches about. Many women can have it all, career and family. However as a woman who attempted to do just that, I cant begin to deny that to a great extent, my family took a backseat or were cared for by hired help. THAT is not what the conservatives view as proper mothering.

This will be very interesting, as unlike what the GOP hopes, this isnt going away. In fact I fear that more dirty laundry will bear its ugly head in the coming days. I would love to see a woman on the ticket. I do personally believe that THIS woman just isnt the RIGHT one. I cant simply throw my vote at someone for gender purposes. McCain simply DID NOT pick the right candidate. Plain and Simple.

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 2, 2008 3:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

And you believe people care what you think Ms. Quinn? You are judging John McCain's motives. It' a shame you haven't spent as much time over a year and a half judging Obama.

Posted by: Joe- Texas | September 2, 2008 3:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I respect and understand your concerns about inexperience etc. Do you feel the same about Obama's lack of experience?

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 3:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In appointing Palin, McCain isn't trying to attract the votes of apologists for a serial sexual predator.

Nor is he looking for the votes of supporters of a sex-predator enabler who lied to cover his tracks and blamed his victims.

Nor is he enlisting women who believe motherhood is a disqualifier for executive office. McCain is looking for intelligent voters.

I don't support McCain/Palin, but I am disgusted by self-proclaimed 'feminists' who demean the dignity of womanhood.

Posted by: non-partisan | September 2, 2008 3:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I completely agree that this is not a game. I can not believe McCain chose this Wonderful woman to be his VP. Wonderful yes, maybe, maybe not, (who knows?)but definately not capable of being President.

Posted by: Joe Hunt | September 2, 2008 3:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey Danielle,

"no nanny for them"?

They already have a nanny--her husband works 2 jobs.

Posted by: Judy | September 2, 2008 3:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin's daughter is pregnant. Clinton's daughter is ugly. So, what's the point? Ugly is forever.

Posted by: Jami | September 2, 2008 3:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WOW! HOW HYPOCRITICAL.... ohh sally you forget one thing the messiah obama picked biden because he is old and white.... im sure its crazy talk but in politics you have to get votes to get elected so you pick people who will get votes... McCain should be damed for picking someone who the voters actually like and who actually acts like a normal person.....if obama would have announced hilary as his running mate im sure you would do nothing but praise that decision... and of course since McCain is evil we can read his mind and know that inside he really hate Palin but just wants the vote... Qualified? You mean like obama....

Posted by: Stephen | September 2, 2008 3:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh, yes, McCain certainly chose Gov. Palin just because she was a woman. It had nothing to do with her great success, her Conservative principles, her experience (yes, it is more than Obama's), and many other things.

Yes, she is a heartbeat away from the Presidency, but the fool the Dems have to be there from Day One has far less experience than even Gov. Palin.

You're just upset because you know that McCain has chosen a candidate who isn't just a box-checker (i.e.: Obama, he's black and... has done nothing). He's chosen someone of actual substance.

Besides, how can you be the judge of equal sexes when you come out with a line like: "A mother's role is different from a father's."

I'm glad Liberal media is so easy to spot: it's the stuff that's blatantly wrong.

I know it is a very impressive thing to be the first African-American nominee for President, but just because you are doesn't mean you deserve it.

Posted by: John | September 2, 2008 3:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Great piece as was your handling of Soledad O'Brien a few minutes ago. I have worked for 39 years in television media advertising but took off 5 years to have my now adult children. I believe that you are right....children do want their mothers. Maybe it's because they live in there for 9 months, who knows but they definitely do. Ms. Pallin is facing more than a few distractions never mind the fact that she governed a city smaller than my Upper East Side neighborhood. McCain insults us all with this pick, men and women alike. All I can think is that the man thinks he's immortal. Or that he wants a #2 who will never push back. CBS shoving you into an uncomfortable spot was hard to watch all those years ago but we're not talking about a television show now.
What gets my blood boiling is that not one of these Republicans will stand up and say what were you thinking? Thank God there are thoughtful journalists like you to fire a warning shot.

Posted by: Marie LeFevre Karp | September 2, 2008 3:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with you, Sally, 100%. Sarah Palin has no choice as a mother except to be very involved in the lives of her children, who are still young. America needs our president to be focused on the all-consuming job of leading this country. If Palin was to become president, she would be constantly torn between the responsibilities of her family and her job.

Posted by: Janet, NJ | September 2, 2008 3:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin's experience is laughable, that's why it's such a horrible pick. Being Governor of a cash rich state isn't difficult, there are no budget problems to deal with. This pick is to try and 'buy' women's votes, not to pick someone who is ready to be POTUS.

Posted by: Mojorising | September 2, 2008 3:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I cannot believe you compared a news anchor position to the vice presidency.

Also, Palin has years of experience in the Executive branch of our government. How does this keep getting confused on the experience debate? Obama has never been in command of troops, and he has never held a veto pen. Palin has done both. How is she unqualified?

Posted by: KW-37 | September 2, 2008 3:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WOW! HOW HYPOCRITICAL.... ohh sally you forget one thing the messiah obama picked biden because he is old and white.... im sure its crazy talk but in politics you have to get votes to get elected so you pick people who will get votes... McCain should be damed for picking someone who the voters actually like and who actually acts like a normal person.....if obama would have announced hilary as his running mate im sure you would do nothing but praise that decision... and of course since McCain is evil we can read his mind and know that inside he really hate Palin but just wants the vote... Qualified? You mean like obama....

Posted by: Stephen | September 2, 2008 3:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am so in line w/ your feelings and the concerns expressed in your article. Hearing republican supported news commentaries insisting all we are learning about Palin is positive, upsets and scares the hell out of me. Thank you and I applaud you!!

Posted by: Mila from Alamo, CA | September 2, 2008 3:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is right on target in her concerns about Sarah Palin's readiness to become "the leader of the free world". I don't find anything "maverick" about John McCain pandering the the extreme religious right of his party. And it is nothing short of hypocritical to criticize his opponent as not being ready to be "commander and chief" because of is alleged inexperience only to pick as his heir apparent someone who is even less so. What a disappointment he is becoming...

Posted by: Paula Huffman | September 2, 2008 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I was amused to read when you wrote in your article: "I was once in a similar position." Do you realize how failed your logic sounds? How can you equate being a failed morning anchorwoman with being Vice President of the United States. With all due respect to your media savy, those two jobs hardly deserve being mentioned in the same sentence. It is mere journalistic hubris on your part. But that does explain your bias.

Still you are a good looking babe. I am sure Joe Biden will take notice.

Posted by: Pastor Ken | September 2, 2008 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I saw your interview on CNN today. You are, apparently, not as strong as many working moms. Shame on you.

Posted by: ann gary | September 2, 2008 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This column is empty and meaningless because it questions Palin's readiness for the Presidency without defending Obama's. As I ready it, my mind automatically responded with the thought, "well neither is Obama".

Most importantly, how does this woman know why McCain chose Palin. You KNOW why? If you are strictly a political hack you mights surmise such things, but you can't know why. All of your association with spiritual and theological should have resulted in some level of humility.

Or are you just a political hack hiding behind "the cloth" to further whatever goal you have? Or is this just fun and a cool career that allows you to rubs shoulders with the elite? Or are you just lost? If it is the last one, then I would ask you to consider the following questions. What makes Obama qualified, beyond studies and being part of the Senate club that ponders (little action) important issues. In other words, contrast his real (not on paper)experience to hers. Ask yourself if your own experiences are coloring your assessments.

Posted by: Steve | September 2, 2008 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I completely agree with Sally Quinn! Finally a woman that has the guts to say it like it is. Sarah Palin's life is pretty complicated at the moment. A downs syndrome child isn't going to grow up and go through the phases of growth like a normal child. There maybe complications and other issues. Does it make sense for the mother of the child to prioritize the country over her obligation to be there for the special needs child. Its pretty obvious that most of the people who don't see Sally Quinn's point of view, don't realize what level of office VP is. At 72, anything can happen to McCain...so lets see... she is going to juggle... downs syndrome child, daughters pregnancy, Iran, War in Iraq, the Economy, healthcare issues... WHAT??? Sally is just being real.

Posted by: Abhi Visuvasam | September 2, 2008 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job? She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome. Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?"

This is unfair and sexist. No one would ever ask this question of a male candidate. Maybe Sarah Palin's husband will be there to take on the role of the more involved parent.

Shame on you.

Posted by: mg | September 2, 2008 3:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess you have to be a Washington insider in order to be acceptable to the Washington elite?

Posted by: An independent Voter | September 2, 2008 3:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn

We are so tired of liberal rant like yours. You and your liberal friends are the hypocrits. You are the ones that are INTOLERANT. It bothers you
that McCain has chosen a 'conservative' Christian
as a running mate.

You and your other writers at Post cannot stand seeing a woman that could be elected VP coming from an ordinary background (from small town America) NOT a graduate from NYU or Havard or Princeton.

You are the snobs. JLambert
San Diego

Posted by: James L | September 2, 2008 3:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think you are very hypocritical. As a woman who is a Republican and is pro-choice I am HIGHLY OFFENDED by your article. You state women must be subservient because of the number of children they have. Tell me, what would you consider a fair number of children and still allow you to become a leader? I guess any parent that has at least five children(one who is actually an adult)and has a child with special needs should be a stay at home mom-definately not work in the entertainment field like Angelina Jolie or be an executive in a company because we all know they have great working hours. You say you are a parent. Well I teach teenagers and have two of my own and if you are really around for YOUR children you would know that a parent can't be around 24/7 to monitor everything their child does. As far as the religion issue Govenor Palin made a choice to be a working mom. Don't dictate what she can and cannot do if you are NOT a part of her religion. In the Orthodox Jewish religion women are NOT allowed to be Rabbis and have many religious restictions solely for the fact that they are women yet a number of them have made it in the working world and are successful leaders.
I think you OWE all of us an apology and should take a deep look at what interior motive you had for writing this article.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 3:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I was amused to read when you wrote in your article: "I was once in a similar position." Do you realize how failed your logic sounds? How can you equate being a failed morning anchorwoman with being Vice President of the United States. With all due respect to your media savy, those two jobs hardly deserve being mentioned in the same sentence. It is mere journalistic hubris on your part. But that does explain your bias.

Still you are a good looking babe. I am sure Joe Biden will take notice.

Posted by: Pastor Ken | September 2, 2008 3:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job? She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome. Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?"

This is unfair and sexist. No one would ever ask this question of a male candidate. Maybe Sarah Palin's husband will be there to take on the role of the more involved parent.

Shame on you.

Posted by: mg | September 2, 2008 3:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You conservatives stupidly declaring that Gov. Palin has more experience than Obama and Biden combined are absurd. By your 4th grade logic McCain has less qualifications to be President than does Palin, how ignorant is that. By that idiot logic anyone who has run a Walmart has more executive experience than either of the Presidential candidates and we should just hand our government over to the first McDonlads manager the shows up. Do everyone a favor and stop parroting the idiot talking points of the right wing nut jobs, you just look like morons.

Palin has experience as a PTA member, a city council person, a mayor of a town of 6000 and 18 months as a Governor of one of the least populated states in the union. She has no international affairs experience (her living near Russia is no more "international affairs" experience any more than my living near Canada is, that's about as stupid an argument as I've heard but then consider the source), she has no experience with defense issues (the "commander" of the Alaska National Guard doesn't count much since the Governor is NOT in charge of them when they are deployed out of Alaska). Her only experience is as the executive of a state that is smaller than some corporations.

If the Dems had waltzed out an un-vetted half term governor of a small state you Repubs would eat them alive...as well you should. Instead, Obama chose someone eminently qualified to be President, namely another presidential candidate, whose unquestioned knowledge in international affairs and defense makes him a serious partner in the Presidency. In contrast, McCain chose an un-vetted woman simply because of her sex.

If he was serious about having a qualified woman on the ticket, and not just making a knee jerk choice as an F-you to Rove and his cronies, there are about a dozen highly qualified candidates who could fit that bill....Sara Palin ain't one of them.

Posted by: Taddles | September 2, 2008 3:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am absolutely stunned by the comments of some here.

This woman is unqualified by any objective measure. She is a mother of 4, still at home children, one of whom is a special needs child. She went back to work three days after that child was born. She intends to run around the country and the world. This isn't about sexism or gender, this is about her lack of qualifications, her bible thumping judgment, and her failure as a parent. Psst, her hubby is a failure too. Maybe they should devote themselves to their family first, not the public sector.

Posted by: Becky | September 2, 2008 3:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think you are very hypocritical. As a woman who is a Republican and is pro-choice I am HIGHLY OFFENDED by your article. You state women must be subservient because of the number of children they have. Tell me, what would you consider a fair number of children and still allow you to become a leader? I guess any parent that has at least five children(one who is actually an adult)and has a child with special needs should be a stay at home mom-definately not work in the entertainment field like Angelina Jolie or be an executive in a company because we all know they have great working hours. You say you are a parent. Well I teach teenagers and have two of my own and if you are really around for YOUR children you would know that a parent can't be around 24/7 to monitor everything their child does. As far as the religion issue Govenor Palin made a choice to be a working mom. Don't dictate what she can and cannot do if you are NOT a part of her religion. In the Orthodox Jewish religion women are NOT allowed to be Rabbis and have many religious restictions solely for the fact that they are women yet a number of them have made it in the working world and are successful leaders.
I think you OWE all of us an apology and should take a deep look at what interior motive you had for writing this article.

Posted by: Elise Cooper | September 2, 2008 3:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WOW! HOW HYPOCRITICAL.... ohh sally you forget one thing the messiah obama picked biden because he is old and white.... im sure its crazy talk but in politics you have to get votes to get elected so you pick people who will get votes... McCain should be damed for picking someone who the voters actually like and who actually acts like a normal person.....

Posted by: Stephen | September 2, 2008 3:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"I wasn't ready for Network TV. Palin isn't ready to be leader of the free world."

Let me get this straight. Just because you flubbed your big chance in life Sarah Palin will too? Kind of a self-centered world you live in. Do you always judge others' abilities based upon your own?

Posted by: Madison | September 2, 2008 3:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Lies, lies, lies, and not surprised
No commitment to what was promised
Don't you just love politics, phony

They tell you what you want to hear to get what they want out of your rear

Posted by: Bradford | September 2, 2008 3:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Spoken like a true elitist. This is a real mother!

Posted by: Independent Voter | September 2, 2008 3:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You have made some excellent points. As a mother including one with special needs, I know how much energy and focus it takes to be there for your children and I only have two. Something always gives when a mother takes on many roles. Too often, it is the children that suffer and this is obvious in Palin's case. Furthermore, I think this choice speaks volumes as to where McCann's priorities lie. Ambition First, Country, Second! He even sold out the military for his ambition. Is she ready for that role? As a Hillary supporter and a woman, I am completely insulted and disgusted! Obama now has my vote!!

Posted by: Teri | September 2, 2008 3:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Kudos Sally! Your comments are right on point. Sara Palin a) lacks the experience to be the VP pick b) She has come to the table with way more baggage than the GOP even could imagine. No way this woman was properly vetted! b) She came to US with her family problems, so how can she and the GOP now want a hands off approach with her? You cant have it both ways. Preaching family values, abstinence, etc., then have a 17 yr old pregnant daughter? Obviously her plate is already full, as Bristol sure had a lot of free time to get knocked up? She returned to work 3 days after giving birth to a Downs Syndrome baby. Most mothers of healthy babies dont want to return even after 3 weeks! Either her motherly instincts are out of touch or she simply doesnt practice the family values that she preaches about. Many women can have it all, career and family. However as a woman who attempted to do just that, I cant begin to deny that to a great extent, my family took a backseat or were cared for by hired help. THAT is not what the conservatives view as proper mothering.

This will be very interesting, as unlike what the GOP hopes, this isnt going away. In fact I fear that more dirty laundry will bear its ugly head in the coming days. I would love to see a woman on the ticket. I do personally believe that THIS woman just isnt the RIGHT one. I cant simply throw my vote at someone for gender purposes. McCain simply DID NOT pick the right candidate. Plain and Simple.

Posted by: AmericanandProud | September 2, 2008 3:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Earlier today McCain barked that his VP pick was fully vetted. Reports are still out regarding how many times the two met, and when she was vetted. As I understand it, the FBI, attorneys, and Republican officials are just now heading to Alaska to Fully vet her.

McCain seems to be as reckless as Bush.

Conservatives love his VP pick. Even saying that her teen daughter's pregnancy is good for the ticket- it makes her more like average Americans.

Are you kidding me?

Posted by: Fully Vetted? | September 2, 2008 3:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

I just watched your interview with Soledad O’Brien on CNN.
I am fuming!. I am shocked that you would limit a women’s role in society.
Just because you seemed to not be able to cope with your one child.
Please.. please do not suppose that the rest of us cannot juggle our
families and work. Do not superimpose your inadequacies as a mother on us.
I am an ardent Hillary Clinton supporter who was leaning towards John McCain, but could not bring myself to vote for a Republican.
However, you have and the Media have just pushed me over the fence. I have never voted Republican.
I voted for McGovern, Carter, Clinton, Gore, & Kerry. But the way the Media, the democratic party, and Obama campaigns have treated Hillary and now Ms. Palin makes me more determined then ever to work to put Mr. McCain in office. Better
the devil you know than the one who hides in democratic clothing.

Posted by: CB | September 2, 2008 3:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess it doesn't occur to you that McCain may have chosen Palin because she shares his beliefs and is willing to battle corruption in her own party and take on big oil. Your biases are obvious. And yet you claim you are a reporter? Since when do reporters editorialize? The Washington Post deserves better.

Posted by: dco | September 2, 2008 3:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother."

I'm conservative and I don't have a problem with Palin or how she raised her family.

Hillary Clinton could not manage her wayward husband. Does that raise the question about whether Hillary Clinton was enough of a hands-on spouse?

How's Obama treating his half brothers? One of them is living in a shack while he has millions. How is that moral or ethical? Even if they are not close, they are still family and related. If he is not willing to look out for a relative, why would he look out for me?

Your assertions are weak and your arguments are even weaker. They are really pathetic.

Obama has empty promises and no substance. He's not even doing his Senate job well. He is not qualified to be President. He promises change and then picks Biden?

And by the way, what makes you qualified to lecture me on faith and values? You don't even know me. I find that insulting.

Posted by: hogwash | September 2, 2008 3:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't understand you media folks! You want to have it both ways! On one hand men and women should be equal, women should have the right to choose. Women can do what every they set out to do and should be created equal. I seen your interview on CNN. I can't believe you think since Govenor Palin has a disabled child she shouldn't work and its her sole responsibility, every family is not like yours. Should she also have been home too, so that maybe her daughter may not have gotten pregnant? This happens in all families, good and bad. All you are doing is empowering the right with all of this rhetoric. You can't say on one hand women need to be equal and then on the other hand say they need to stay home if something is out of the ordinary! Obama doesn't even want to talk about this issue, he believes that families need to be out of this. John McCain seems okay with his vetting process and that he was aware of this issue and a DUI that happened more than 20 yrs ago. The only people who are worried about this is the media. Aren't you also of the party who think we need to afford people another chance. Just because someone makes a mistake, one person needs to be responsible others? By the way, at least her daughter is doing the right thing!! and getting married.

Posted by: Tina | September 2, 2008 3:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

These dupes are showing us how bias and sick they are and are setting us up for a Regan type landslide come November!

Pure Double-Standard Bile on a Faith Blog no less!

Their plan to trick us all into giving up our liberty is to sell Communist ideals under a "What Would Jesus Do" or "On Faith" header on their websites.

Yeah right. . .

The chattering class is so dumb and arrogant they think that all the people who produce, grow and fix things are stupid but they can't do any of that and it never dawns on them that we are essential - they are not.

One day Atlas is Going To Shrug!

Posted by: The Medias Doing It For Us | September 2, 2008 3:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I want to know why no one has challenged Mrs. Palin on why she boarded a plane in labor with the last child for a 6 hour plane trip. What about her judgment; and it does open up the question of "did she have to get back to Alaska because Bristol was having the baby" No woman in her right mind would board a plane in labor.

Posted by: jackieteeee | September 2, 2008 3:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you, Sally, for finally speaking to "motherhood". No woman should run for the presidency with small children under foot. It's appalling, and sad, and probably doomed to failure. In fact, the children are also being set up for failure. In all the clips I have seen of Ms. Palin's children, I have yet to see one of them smile. There is something already wrong with this family picture.

Once again, the "right" proves that they really care little about what they claim is important - "family" and "morality". They care more about controlling others. Sad.

Our country deserves better than Palin and her family situation. Her election will be a disaster for the country, her family, and ours.

Posted by: Denise Morse | September 2, 2008 3:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

BRAVO Sally... its high time someone started the ball rolling on the real questions regarding Sarah Palin's "distractions" at home - positioning herself with JM's (pre and post) help, as the potential Leader of this Country!!
I listened to your interview on CNN... makes me wonder just how Right Wing that news organization really is.. behind the scenes...

Posted by: Rich R | September 2, 2008 3:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Uh, am I the only one who really liked Ms. Quinn's article? I'm with you, sister. People on this board are wacked. Talk about ignorant fools.

Posted by: Tarheel | September 2, 2008 3:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How dare you criticize the typer of mother Sarah Palin is. You don't know her so how can you pass judgement? You have proven that you are not a true feminist, but instead only defend liberal women.

And why on earth would you want to bring up the experience issue? All that does is point fingers at the top of the Democratic ticket, Barack Obama, who touts his executive experience due to running a campaign? Despite the fact that she isn't even on the top of the ticket, Sarah Palin has been an executive for 15 years as both as a mayor and a governor. While Barack Obama was voting present over a hundred times his first year as a senator and then campaigning the rest of his incomplete term, Sarah Palin was running the largest state in the country.

Posted by: Sam Keffler | September 2, 2008 3:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I just saw your disgusting interview on CNN while on a break at work. I can not believe that in this day and age women like you actually espouse the mind blowing assessment that a woman can not have children and govern at the same time. You were bitter and mean and totally out of line. Oh yeah, you may want to change plastic surgeons. Your recent chemical peel looks dreadful. My husband, who is a fellow plastic surgeon agrees. (Oh yea, and I have three children, one with autism.) Don't you make enough money to go to a reputable plastic surgeon?

Posted by: Suzanne Wood | September 2, 2008 3:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,

Well, Imagine That! I am a Family Values Voter, and guess what, I am voting the "McCain-Palin" Presidential Ticket.

Many years ago in Sunday School we were taught to "Remove the Giant California Redwood from Our Own Eyes Before We Consider Attempting to Remove The Splinter From Our Sister's.

This is a great teaching with which to live and sometimes difficult to practice. However, this practice does work and one becomes a better person because of it.

Governor Palin, to my knowledge, is a human being subject to faults and failings, and yet also great achivements and successes as anyone of us.

Though please remember, as humans we are also capable of demonstrating great compassion and good.

What thinkest thou?

Posted by: Louise Hollins | September 2, 2008 3:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Bill Ayers; 'nuff said.

Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2008 3:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Brilliant article. Thank you.

Posted by: April | September 2, 2008 3:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The author of this article is a fool.

Posted by: Steve | September 2, 2008 3:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Of course McCain picked Palin to win the election - didn't Obama pick Biden to win? I find your article insulting to women, not Palin's pick as the vice-president candidate. How about you do some research on her acts as governor and successes within Alaska before you assume the choice was a mere pick for her biological parts? You are demeaning to women when you insinuate that. And let's lay off the daughter - it's a private matter and all you rude reporters are just making it harder on the young couple. I consider myself a conservative Republican with strong family values and the choice of Palin is not at all hard for me to swallow.

Posted by: c meredit | September 2, 2008 3:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a professional, working woman, I found your comments about Gov. Palin alarmingly arrogant. Judging Gov Palin on the tenants of her particular faith and how she practices is also inappropriate. I believe the majority of working mothers can identify more with Gov. Palin than even Sen. Clinton. Perhaps that is the fear of her being chosen the VP.

Posted by: D Reed | September 2, 2008 3:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I just wonder how many of you obviously hard-core right wing posters would be as sympathizing and forgiving if this had been one of Senator Obama's daughter's faced with an unwed teen aged pregnancy!

I'm willing to bet the mortgage not very many!

Posted by: Darryl from Kansas | September 2, 2008 3:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I AM a hands on mother- I am a stay at home mom by choice and I have teenagers at home and am raising the last of a combined family of 9.

Regardless of religion- we all have the "right to choose" what we do and even tho values are taught in the home, does not mean that teens will listen or choose them. I know preachers who have pregnant daughters and sons of preachers who are out getting girls pregnant- where is this discussion? The media is grasping at straws trying to find "something" wrong with her personally when the Media should be focusing on the most important issues and a pregnant teenager isn't something that will make or break our nation at this time! If the media wants to talk about teen pregnancy then they best be talking about the other government officials who have this problem in their homes as well- she isnt having an abortion much to the dismay of the liberals- she is making the best of a poor choice- lets give this family the support and credit for their right to choose!

Posted by: Gwen Mangelson | September 2, 2008 3:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn's comments on CNN a few minutes ago regarding her views on Sarah Palin only reinforced my decision to vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin. I am a Hillary Clinton supporter;and I have voted the Democratic ticket my entire adult life--not this time around. I cannot believe the double standard, she an educated woman, embraces.

Mary Kubas-Meyer, EdD

Posted by: Mary Kubas-Meyer, EdD | September 2, 2008 3:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

i read the artical and also seen sally quinn on cnn and i have to say she is one of the most disgusting people on this planet. why in the world don`t you people get rid of the idiots there and get some real newspeople that can be fair to both partys. sally is so far left it makes me sick to even see her face on tv or the webpage. absolutely pathetic person she is. you don`t even try to hide the love you have for the democrats. really makes me sick so be assured i will never read the web page and will change any channel any of the so called reporters from ur paper appear on.....

Posted by: jim | September 2, 2008 3:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't understand you media folks! You want to have it both ways! On one hand men and women should be equal, women should have the right to choose. Women can do what every they set out to do. I seen your interview on CNN. I can't believe you think since Govenor Palin has a disabled child she shouldn't work. Should she also have been home too, so that maybe her daughter may not have gotten pregnant? This happens in all families, good and bad. All you are doing is empowering the right with all of this rhetoric. You can't say on one hand women need to be equal and then on the other hand say they need to stay home if something is out of the ordinary!

Posted by: Tina | September 2, 2008 3:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I believe that Ms.Quinn is quite right in her analysis of the current situation surrounding the Palins. There is no way this pregnancy of her 17yr.old daughter should be off limits. They chose the lime light when she accepted the invitation onto John McCain's ticket. John Edwards was beaten up by the media and politicians that are non democratic and some democrats for his infedility. why Should the Palins be different? Her daughter becoming pregnant at 17 show's a lack of parental control within her own family. Is that the kind of role model parents want for their teen daughters? I think not! At least I don't. If being the daughter of a possible President of the country is acceptable, then the gloves are off for teen girls and who can tell them different?

Additionally, all those Republican surrogates who are defending their "vice president candidate" are obligated to, afterall, that is what they are paid to do. I also think it is a big fat lie when McCain says "we already knew about the pregnancy and we were not concerned." It troubles me that they would bold facedly lie to the country as a whole by saying that and frankly it makes them untrustworthy. Sen.Edwards had to remove himself, sen.Obama distanced himself from the shadows of Sen.Edwards saga, therefore this family is rightly investigated by the media and whoever else chooses to do so within the law. Finally, if this is the position that John McCain takes "she is exactly what America needs" then his judgement in my book is worse than Obama perceives; he is not who i would want to take that 3am call.

Posted by: Felix | September 2, 2008 3:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn, a legend in her own mind has the nerve to pass judgment on who is qualified to be the Republican Vice Presidential nominee. Ah, come on, quinn, you're just as big a fraud as that idiot at the Baltimore Sun. You're AFRAID, just like all the other lefties. Sarah Palin is going to pick off a lot of female voters and you can't stand it. You people are as transparent as glass.

Posted by: Steve toth | September 2, 2008 3:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a "stay at home" dad, raising my two daughters. I found your comments on CNN very sexist and disparaging. Let me tell you, men can raise children and be very caring and nurturing. Who the heck made you judge and jury on child raising??? I think you over-stepped your area of expertise and owe dads a very BIG apology!!!

Posted by: Ray Daniels - Sacramento | September 2, 2008 3:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn's comments on CNN a few minutes ago regarding her views on Sarah Palin only reinforced my decision to vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin. I am a Hillary Clinton supporter;and I have voted the Democratic ticket my entire adult life--not this time around. I cannot believe the double standard, she an educated woman, embraces.

Mary Kubas-Meyer, EdD

Posted by: Mary Kubas-Meyer, EdD | September 2, 2008 3:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Mommie Dearest" (Governor Palin) chose to give birth to Trig, a special needs child with down syndrome. For the sake of ambition she hands the nurturing of her special needs baby off to others. Governor Palin’s “Pro-life values” should extend beyond the baby leaving the birth canal. Ambition in a black man is "uppity". Ambition in wealthy white “Mommie Dearest” is “selfless”. We haven't come so far after all.

Posted by: Kathy E | September 2, 2008 3:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Here it is, the heart of sexism. The mother should say home and raise the kids, because the father is unable to do so. Using obstructionist and dictatorial Nancy Pelosi as a role model for mothers isn't going to play well. Watching how one reacts to a family crisis under pressure tells us more about a candidate than watching a perfectly clean Stepford wife, which sally Quinn would obviously prefer. And Ms. Quinn, Evangelicals do believe in consensual sex; they also believe in accepting the consequences of their actions, which in this case includes keeping the child. Chalk one up for Palin.

Posted by: Mensa Dude | September 2, 2008 3:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Are you as shocked and agry at the Democratic party for choosing Obama just because he is black? I doubt it. Your hypocracy is stunning, but predictable.

Posted by: Chuck from Ohio | September 2, 2008 3:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn's commentary on Sarah Palin is another example of the extremes that the liberals will go to to insure Obama's election. No exaggeration is unfair, no twisted truth is unfair. Where is your professional journalism, or did you skip that course in your academic endeavors ? I am sick of this crap that this paper, NBC News and CNN puts out as journalistic commentary and reporting.

You deserve Obama and he deserves you. Be happy

Posted by: Stan Grodin | September 2, 2008 3:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman" - and You determined this how? If she decides to get a gender reassignment before the election, I would still support her/him. You are blinded by your own agenda.

Posted by: jason goeke | September 2, 2008 3:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, your article is far more "cynical" in nature than McCains choice. How is it that you so easily condemn a woman who has easily risen so much higher than yourself (and of course "Saint Hillary") while carrying a burden so much larger than your own. One might think you would be excited to see the glass ceiling shattering, but no: Only liberals may do that, correct?

Posted by: Scott in Michigan | September 2, 2008 3:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find the attacks on Sarah Palin so unfounded that it is funny. The truth of the matter is she doesn't favor abortion like Hillary nor the ban on guns which is our constitional right as set forth by the 2nd Amendment. I have my guns but only to be used when and if our government decides to take them away as did the Gestopo before they held the masses helpless to do anything. Sarah holds traditional values and the liberal left feels so threatened that they have to attack her in anyway possible so they have to go after her daughter. Well I for one and many like me where debating on whether or not to vote at all or write in someone we felt held more fiscally conservative values and was unafraid of taking on corrupt government and the good old boys mentality. I will be telling all my friends and relatives and work associates to now take up the cause and vote for McCain because of his very wise choice in Sarah Palin as running mate.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 3:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sorry, but Ms Quinn's rant doesn't come close to hitting the mark. She's angry because he picked a woman AND a conservative? Well, are you mad because he picked a woman or because he picked a conservative? You're upset because it was "A calculated decision"... to try and win the presidency. Wake up Quinn! Every choice for vp is calculated to win the presidency.
Biden is the v.p. candidate for Obama because, unlike Obama, Biden has foreign affairs experience. What, do you think he picked Biden because he's got nice hair?
McCain picked Palin to shore up the right wing of the conservative party. Additionally, like McCain she is a reformer. Nothing more, nothing less. Angry Clinton supporters know McCain has more in common with Hillary than Obama does. He didn't need Palin to help pick up Hillary's supporters. Besides, its pretty clear to me that most of Hillary's supporters are pro-choice not pro-life as is Mrs. Palin
And that is ultimately where Ms. Quinn's objections to Palin as the vp nominee really falls apart. Come on, Ms. Quinn, you think McCain cynically picked a pro-life candidate to attract pro-choice votes? Get real....

Posted by: John Sheppard | September 2, 2008 3:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin has far more experience than Obama. Her character trumps Obama's on so many levels. You are upset because McCain picked a woman who will help him win! Do you know how stupid that sounds? Obama picked Biden because he is white, and because he thought he would help him win.

Posted by: Meg | September 2, 2008 3:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn. Just because you failed miserably when it became your turn to rise to the occasion doesn't mean all women will automatically choke. This post says more about you and your demons than about Palin or McCain. Better take it up with your therapist.

BTW: "Pesidency?" Get a spellchecker. This is your so-called job, afterall.

Posted by: Nick in VA | September 2, 2008 3:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Amen! perfectly said.

Posted by: Matt | September 2, 2008 3:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is so yesterday. Does she expect us to believe that if a woman is not selected it is prejudice, yet if a woman is selected it is an act of cynicism? In other words the old white man is damned if he does, and damned if he doesn't. If that is the choice then I'd just as soon be damned and pick Governor Palin.

Palin/Jindal in 2112!!

Posted by: cluelessinky | September 2, 2008 3:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn just went on CNN and said that mothers weren't fit to hold public office. She posed the question, "what would happen if Palin had a sick kid and a crisis happened, what would she choose to focus on?" She then said that "men do not pay as much attention to their children as women," and that letting a father care for a sick child was not a viable option.

I'm surprised that someone with such backward, anachronistic views of women and family would be taken seriously and allowed a voice on the site of a major newspaper.

Posted by: Cori McFlye | September 2, 2008 3:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree 150% with Sally Quinn. How very hypocritical of the religious right to act as if this is no big deal. It is a huge deal. For Sarah Palin's unmarried 17 year old daughter to be pregnant is an outrage. What kind of mother is Sarah Palin? While she's out here telling the world to be abstinent her own daughter is having unprotected sex. Isn't it a sin for an unmarried person to have sex? Isn't it fornication? How dare Sarah Palin try to tell anyone else how to live when her own daughter doesn't even respect her enough to listen to her. Hypocrite. That's what you are Gov. Palin and you should drop out of the race and go home to care for your special needs child and try to help your daughter with your illegitimate grandchild.

Posted by: Casandra | September 2, 2008 3:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow. What close-minded drivel. I just watched you on CNN and had to comment on what you said about how dads really can't meet a child's needs in the same way as a woman. Both my husband and I would strongly argue with you.

You know what I love about the Palins? Todd Palin IS an "average dad." He IS capable and willing to care for his children and do the dirty work like change diapers, etc. I love the picture of family that they represent because it is REAL. It's NOT the same as everyone, and not everyone is blessed to have two parents in the home, etc. But it's real.

Posted by: Mindy | September 2, 2008 3:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally I am watching you on CNN! Perfect! You are articulate and beautiful too!! Ignore all these attacks these are frustated Republicans who know McCain made a mistake in choosing his VP. She may even be qualified but she has too much baggage( not meant to be rude). She may be able to handle Alaska, but the entire nation! Obama could have chosen Hilary and got all the rural,Christian and womens vote and he didn't you think it was about winning the election or keeping the Country first!!

Posted by: Moh'd | September 2, 2008 3:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I just saw this woman on CNN and I am shocked! She has some decent points in her article but after hearing her on CNN I discredit all of it. She just blasted this woman by saying that conservation religious republicans will be bothered by her and her pregnant daughter because in those beliefs woman are subservient, meant to serve, and meant to stay home and only take care of the kids. She just branded an entire HUGE group of people that think women should be in essence barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen only. As part of the conservative religious republican group, I am deeply offended. She is taking a small percentage of people and telling the world that we all feel this way. It is ridiculous.

Posted by: Amy | September 2, 2008 3:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

let me 1st say to you miss Quinn as a male i am highly offended by your article on Gov. Palin. how dare you try to make it seem as if she is not a good mother because quite frankly that is what you are saying. she is not a single mother and has the support of her husband, father of all her children.
he has just as much responsibility for those children as she does.
If Obama was to be elected to office would that make him less of a father seeing that he has two kids??
Women all around the world are fighting for equal rights in our society today and its women like you who continue to make that aspiration difficult.

check yourself before your talk about others

Posted by: jamel | September 2, 2008 3:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

why are we still talking about Sara Palin and her teenage daughter? this ie getting rediculas. I watched you on CNN today and was really offended at your words regarding working mothers. There are many female executives and CEO's of companies that have more than one child, but you make it work with the support of your family and husband. I think the media is pouring too much energy into Sarah Palin and her daughter. Many families face this every day. The truth is no matter how much of a hands on mother you may be, your daughter can still become pregnant. Kids are very good had hiding what they want to hide.

Posted by: Fawn R. | September 2, 2008 3:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dr Owen,

I suggest that it is the special-needs infant which distinguishes SP's parental status from that of the other three major-party ticket candidates. Combine a yet-to-be-weaned baby with the Down syndrome and you have a child with extra need for close parental contact.

And Senator is a far cry from Vice President, a heartbeat away. And Sen Biden did consider resigning (or not taking the oath) when his wife died, out of concern for the two boys. So it was a factor he weighed carefully.

Posted by: Reap What You Sow | September 2, 2008 3:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn, Your bias is so pronounced it is shameful. How do you get a job like you do and still be so ignorant. Palin has way more experience than Obama. She is running a state for crying out loud. You liberals live in a constent state of immorality yet want to hang any conservative who errs in the slightest. No family is perfect. Remember Bill's. At least this family will let the child live!!!! It would end up in the dumpster if it were your choice

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008 3:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks for exposing your underlying sexist double-standard. What a pathetic and sad commentary. You obviously have zero understanding of anything going on outside Washington.

Posted by: Full Time Dad | September 2, 2008 3:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are angry. Not a good trait for a "faith" person. Oh, I forgot about Jeramiah Wright...

News flash: Sarah Palin is more qualified to be president than Barack Obama and Joe Biden!

OBAMA: A street agitator/state senator/US senator with absolutely NO ACCOMPLISHMENTS.

BIDEN: 36 years in the US Senate and absolutely NO ACCOMPLISHMENTS.

PALIN: Tax cuts as Mayor. Rooted out corruption as Chair of the Oil & Gas Conservation commission. Dumped corrupt governor in primary victory. Budget cutter and earmark slasher. Put together pipeline deal that had fallen dormant, and on and on and on...

Sally, you're just angry because your token woman -- Hillary (of the no accomplishment world, too) -- got heaved overboard by your patronizing party.

Best regards,

Brian Siegel
Bitter America

Posted by: Brian Siegel | September 2, 2008 3:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment


This looks some familar, Judge Bork, Clarence Thomas and now Gov. Palin. The left wing Jihad has been launched.

Posted by: Tex | September 2, 2008 3:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

I am a christian and a very patriotic American. I am happy to respond as a decided voter to your article on McCain's choice as a running mate. Sarah Palin, by her example is a determined and dedicated public servant who believes in the right to life by our unborn. She also believes that government should do only what the people want it to do and NOT what they can get by with. Because of McCain's choice in her, along with my confidence that McCain is the right man for President, I am very happy to say that together they will get my vote on November 4, 2008.

As for your reference to the possibility that folks like me feel dissapointed in Palin's decision to work outside the home in such a capacity, I say you are grasping at straws. You can be assured that I will vote WITH MY CONSCIENCE when I cast my vote for the McCain-Palin ticket. Any woman that seems to have such an ability to juggle family, spiritual life and work PLUS take seriously the responsibility of the welfare of others with such positive results has my total respect. She obviously reveres her husband and together they seem to provide excellent care for their children. I will remember to thank my God for Sarah Palin and ask that He continue to give her strength and support. May God bless us as we make the final choice.

Sincerely,

Arleen Pope

Posted by: Arleen Pope | September 2, 2008 3:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why is it when a strong woman who is a conservative evokes anger from the left, yet when a liberal woman with no experience runs for president it is ok? What is wrong with McCain choosing a woman to appeal to the GOP base? Isn't that why O'Bama chose Biden, to shore up his meager experience gaps? Palin's lack of experience pales compared to the Dem's ticket with Obama on top. He has accomplished absolutely nothing while Palin has run a city and a state and threw out the corrupt politicians on both sides of the aisle.
Why are liberals so threatened by conservative women? Women are ok in politics can even run for office if they are Democrats only. It always amazes me that the liberals find more ways to lose elections every time there is one.

Posted by: Dick Theis | September 2, 2008 3:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I’m as liberal as the next dyed-in-the-wool Democratic woman – the granddaughter of immigrants, a working mother and professional, who plans to vote for Obama (and voted for him in the primaries). And I have to say, Sally, that although there are million reasons to be horrified by John McCain’s choice, you are just profoundly wrong in arguing that Palin cannot fulfill her parental role and her VP (or heaven forbid, her Presidential) duties because she has an infant with Down syndrome and a pregnant daughter. Why does no one ask whether Barak Obama can fulfill his Presidential duties and still give his daughters all the parenting that they will need? Honestly! What would happen if, G-d forbid, something catastrophic happened to one of his daughters and she wound up as a “special needs” child? Would we ask him to resign the Presidency because he couldn’t possibly make the nation his first priority anymore? Please! People juggle. It isn’t always easy. But in the middle of a nuclear crisis, I would hope that Palin’s husband would surely step in to meet the children’s needs. Probably grandparents and other family members as well. That’s how we manage in our household. Although my children are, in the grand scheme of things, my first priority – the reality is that sometimes work beckons and I can’t be the one doing the comforting or meeting with the doctors or shopping for the special dress. Fortunately, I have a village, and we are managing to raise three reasonably polite, reasonably well-adjusted, reasonably achieving children. I'm sure Palin will have a village, too, and it’s really not the worst thing that can happen to Palin’s children. To question her career choice or John McCain’s judgment in selecting here based on the fact that those children have some intensive needs at the moment is just wrong. And regressive. So could we back off please? There are legitimate reasons to question McCain's horrendous VP choice but Palin's five children simply are not one of them.

Posted by: Naomi | September 2, 2008 3:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You don't like her? Don't vote for McCain. But have the decency to listen to your savior, Obama: the 17 year old girl is off limits.

What a classless woman you've become.

Posted by: grunk | September 2, 2008 3:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn you hipocrite. Since when do you have morals at all, much less a license to preach?

My God woman, read some of your older ravings, you have been for a woman's right to "choose" her sexuality, her reproduction and her politics.

It would be more consistent of you to encourage daughter to endorse Palin specifically because she is a woman, encourage her daughter to abort her child on principle, turn lesbian to establish her own identity and to vote for Obama specifically because he is black.

Posted by: Lizzy K | September 2, 2008 3:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Chea-Pet Joe Biden has the stones to debate Palin what will you Lib's say after she mops the floor with him.

Biden only got picked a Obama's VP because he said "Finally a Clean Black Democrat!"

His words not mine - "Finally!"

Poor Rangle, Jesse and Al

Hillary said she was ready to be President day one and So was McCain but Obama only gave a speech once.

Right on girl!

Posted by: Just Wait | September 2, 2008 3:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think the Republican party leak the info about Palin daughter so that it will take the focus off Palin being accused of using her position to get her sister ex boyfriend fired

Posted by: Tara From Columbia, SC | September 2, 2008 3:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Most of your posts indicate that you are VERY partisan indeed. To compare Palin's experience with Obama's is not a credible argument. First of all, millions of Americans voted for Obama. Palin got one vote - McCain's. You have to look at McCain's judgment here. He took a gamble with her. His preferred choice is Lieberman or Ridge. But the conservative right rejected both these choices. McCain has lost control of his own campaign, and did not thoroughly vet Ms. Palin. Now this poor woman and her family are under the scrutiny of the whole world. Yes, this choice fired up the base but surely there must be hundreds of other Republicans better vetted and better qualified for the VP slot. McCain is OLD and cancer-prone. With that in mind, why is he subjecting all of us Americans to such risk?

Posted by: GB in Mass | September 2, 2008 3:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

Family values types will indeed fall in behind Palin's daughters decision to not abort her baby. In fact, they will applaud the family's decision to stand behind their daughter.

You have a very narrow knowledge of "Family Values" if you can't see how this family is taking responsibility here.

That's sad.

Posted by: John Hampton | September 2, 2008 3:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Get over it. McCain choose a woman and the "Big O" didn't.

This is great for women in America, we could get a woman president.

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008 3:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Madame, with all due respect, you are an idiot. As I read your moronic diatribe, your leftist close-minded views became clearer and clearer. From your sentence, "this is nothing against Palin," through the rest of your editorial, it is obvious your have the highest distain for Palin. You're stupid statements about an "aging McCain," coupled with your diahrea laced statements about Palin's "inexperience" and her "family problems," are the height of hypocrisy. You are empty headed for your ignoramous attack against Palin and her daughter. You obviously pant heavily at the very thought of BHO; but Madame, if your candidate lives (as he does) in a glass house, you might want to stop throwing stones. BHO is unqualified to be President of the United States. No experience in his resume` what-so-ever. Two years in the US Senate (too bad he was absent better then 60 percent of the time). Though I understand it takes a lot of time to run for President, it is not supposed to occur at the expense of the job he has. I believe that is as a US Senator. He is an empty suit. If, Madame, you had bothered to "vett" BHO, with even one tenth of your brain cells used to write the subject article, you would have found him wanting as a Presidential candidate.

Posted by: greg | September 2, 2008 3:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am confused. John McCain selected a Governor of a State, I seem to remember that Bill Clinton was a Govenor of a State. The feminists should be excited about McCain's choice, she is everything they have wanted to be and more. She is a woman, she is a wife, she is a mother, she takes care of her family and she has multiple years of executive experience and two years running a state that provides 20% of the United States energy from oil. And, she has done it as a Republican...........maybe that is where the problem comes, she has not had to be a victum. Life has dealt she and her husband a couple of blows and like most Americans, they are dealing with the situation as a family. John..you made a great choice. I am an Evangelical Christian and I can see not fault in John's choice. I support the Palin family, I support Sarah Palin and I will vote for McCain-Palin.

Oh, yes, and another thing! You left the Clinton's daughter alone during Bill's election and the terrible days in the White House. If you are smart you will leave the Palin daughter alone now.

Posted by: George | September 2, 2008 3:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Should Joe Biden have stayed at home after losing his wife and daughter in order to be with his sons? If Sarah Palin's husband had all of the same credentials as his wife and was given the same opportunity to be VP would you recommend that he stay at home for his family? I thought that equal opportuniy for women didn't have an asterick mark beside it. It seems to me that Mrs. Palin considers her child with Down Syndrome a blessing rather than the curse that main stream media would like to attribute to her. Interestingly, she embodies the ordinary / exraordinary qualites that Obama is trying to inspire and motivate in Americans. I am looking forward to McCain and Palin being our next leaders.

Posted by: Keith B. Owen, M.D. | September 2, 2008 3:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In regard to this statement:

McCain's cynical choice has created a dilemma for many women. For still-angry Hillary Clinton voters, they will have to decide if they want to vote against their "concscience" and political interests by voting to elect a Republican woman who's even more conservative than McCain.

QUESTION--What concsience can one have if you can obstinately fight for the "right" to slaughter the
unborn?
PS And don't use the Supreme Court ruling as a defense--They were elite idiots in 1973 ruling against their own concsiences.

Posted by: Sick of people whose light is darkness | September 2, 2008 3:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Barbara Bush was correct that the criticism and scrutiny are enormous - IF a Republican is holding the office. It is outrageous how biased the press is against anything and everyone on the right. The op-eds and blogs have been non-stop with criticism of the choice of Sarah Palin. No matter she has more executive experience than anyone else on either ticket. She's a woman, but a Republican woman, so she must be crucified. It's disgusting.

Posted by: George Campbell | September 2, 2008 3:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is a retread liberal and could not carry Sarah Palin BIBLE .
Do not under estimate the value voter envangelicals .
We are forgiving and will vote this ticket .

Posted by: joe | September 2, 2008 3:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Seems to be Sally protest too much. Could it be that Palin is a better looking, stronger, than poor Sally? Is she actually jealous that Sarah Palin could be more powerful that the matron of Washington snobery? Palin out shines Biden in executive experience three to zero and Obama three to zero. She will make a great Vice President and one day President.

Posted by: Champsummers | September 2, 2008 3:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?"
I am a Hubert Humphrey Democrat and it is easy. Has Obama ever run a city? NO. Has he ever run a state? NO. Does he show up for most of the votes in his senate seat since he was elected? NO. Governor Palin has gone after corrupt politicians in her own party. Has Obama done this? NO. All things else being equal (and they are not) Palin is at least a heartbeat away from the Presidency... Obama is not.

Posted by: Edward Sonner Viet Vet | September 2, 2008 3:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's interesting that Ms Quinn doesn't have a clue about moral issues and yet has a "On Faith" blog.
Sally, might take a moment to ask your "renowned religious scholars" if any of them have ever heard of a religious faith that doesn't condem abortions.
Yet Ms. Quinn and the rest of the left-wing liberal rag publications support "a women's right to choose".
Thank God for Gov. Palin and her daughter.

Posted by: CraigInTexas | September 2, 2008 3:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

stop your pro feminist clap trap you old blowhard. Palin has expereince and the ability to connect with the people that matter avergae Americans, not D.C. insiders who are nothing better then paid mouth pieces, at bestr, at worst treacherous scum that should be sent to Gitmo

Posted by: out of touch | September 2, 2008 3:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I fully concur with these comments. My first thought was disgust, politics as usual, and not what was right for the country. I am a Reagan Republican and cannot support such a cynical ploy to get elected. I want to see a Republican President, but not this way. Come election day, assuming Palin is still on the ticket, my vote goes to Bob Barr.

Posted by: mike Herman | September 2, 2008 3:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

OMG do you read your articles or is this just stream of consciousness? First you presume that any female VP nominee got there purely because she's a woman and a pawn of male politicians. In doing so, you ignore, in Palin's case, a lengthy time in public office, and achievement in as Alaska's governor. Next you question a woman's (any woman's) ability to serve in any high office and still maintain a family, with all the challenges that accompany. I'm sure no one questioned Sen. Biden's ability to serve in the senate as a widower with two injured small sons. I'm sure those boys need him as much as Trig and Bristol need their mother. Palin, at least has a husband to depend on.

Way to set the women's movement back a half century!

Posted by: Nick in VA | September 2, 2008 3:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, get off the sky is falling bandwagon. Senator McCain would have chosen Governor Palin whether she was a man or a woman. The fact that she is a woman is simply an added bonus. This is something that ought to be celebrated by those on the left, but they don't really want equal rights for conservative women. They don't want conservative black men to succeed, i.e. Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell, etc.

The real problem for those on the left is that Palin is such a stellar pick, the liberals are reeling. She's sharp, intelligent, accomplished, attractive and more qualified than the Democrat's Presidential candidate. She's an executive, a CHANGE agent, and from far outside the beltway. Those are qualities you cannot say about Obama or Biden.

While I'm sure the McCain camp hopes to pick up disaffected Hillary women voters, I think their hope is to pick up moderate, independent women voters who are not ideologically driven.

Posted by: Marc in OKC | September 2, 2008 3:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I would never judge a parent based on what her daughter does because I have seen many kids from "good" Christian homes make mistakes with sometimes serious consequences (pregnancies, suicides, car crashes, other run-ins with the law). It was probably only by a twist of fate that I didn't end up one of these case studies. It does, however, raise questions about Palin's staunch support for abstinence-only sex education. How much more ironic can it be that her own daughter became pregnant? If Gov Palin had educated her daughter about birth control this could have been avoided. So, to be consistent with her principles, Gov Palin must not only accept Bristol's pregnancy but must unequivocally celebrate it and, by extension, all other unintended pregnancies. To do otherwise would be extremely hypocritical.

I agree with those commenters who find Ms. Quinn's post today anti-feminist. If Gov Palin has managed to juggle an extremely demanding job with the extreme demands of raising a house full of kids, kudos to her and her husband for making it work. What an awesome role model a nursing mother in the White House could make. (I personally could never find the energy to do this.) Her visibility could do wonders for working women everywhere. Oh, but wait, no it wouldn't because her views are so ANTI-family. Why are we lauding a woman who admittedly took less than a week off from work after giving birth? Is that the standard working mothers must meet to be accepted in the workplace?

In the end, I won't be voting for McCain/Palin, not because of who and what they ARE, which has dominated the discourse thus far, but because of what they would do if elected. Like take away the reproductive choices of all other women in America, for example.

Posted by: Reap What You Sow | September 2, 2008 3:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, admit it, the thought of a bright, accomplished, pretty, spiritual, athletic, politically savvy, loving, straight, strong-minded, Conservative woman scares the crap out of you and all your "beltway buddies".

This is the ultimate contrast; She is everything that you and the inbred Washington crowd despise and everything that most Americans really want in their leaders. I think that you are in for a real surprise.

Obama has a problem: time will reveal him to be a a stylish, but empty, suit.

McCain has a problem: time will reveal that his ticket is up side down.

Posted by: Jez | September 2, 2008 3:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What's your problem lady? The democrats picked Obama simply because he is black first, and totally liberal second. He has no experience at all to ruin the country but I suspect he will do a good job at it. It is highly irresponsible to attack someone with Palin's background yet continually overlook Barry's highly questionable and potentially dangerous past associations upon which he formed his beliefs and idealogy. When Palin and Mccain speak you have a good idea what they are talking about. When Obama speaks the first reaction is: Huh? What did he say? Did he say anything?

Posted by: daddydon | September 2, 2008 3:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

A mother's obligation towards her children don't end at birth. They cannot be ever delegated and they go beyond the day when they are ready to fend for themselves and start their own families.

Will the baby go along on the campaign? Who and how will he be cared for? A physically challenged child is a full time job at all ages.

Bristol was alone without a mother to talk to in the difficult and confusing transition years from child to grown woman. Will she have a mother to talk to when she delivers the baby? She will be married to the biological father of the baby. Is he ready to take on all the responsabilities and duties of a father, a family value, or is this just to mitigate on paper what was an irresponsible act. Is caring for her baby and creating a home from such inauspicious beginnings within her range without a wise and caring mother to speak to and consult with?

Life begins at conception and the development and birth of a child is a divine gift. Caring and loving it and guiding the newborn throughout his life into adulthood are the only family values the family is built on. Just bringing someone into this world and consider this the final achievement has nothing to do with family values.

What has happened here and what is going on and where it all is headed has nothing to do with family values.

Posted by: Dina | September 2, 2008 3:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

And Obama Husain was a drug dealer at one time. Coke dealer.

Posted by: joe | September 2, 2008 3:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dude.... thats a dope analysis.... for shizzle.

Posted by: Ashish Jangid | September 2, 2008 3:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The article sounds like the ravings of a religious and political bigot.

Posted by: Carl | September 2, 2008 3:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The terms "cynical and calculated" sound like a jounalistic partisan descriptions of an opposition candidate. In your religious blogging have you heard of the term "reflection"?
I find Mrs. Palin's credentials to run for the offcie of VP to be outstanding. In case your memory is short, a governor is a position of leadership, and gives the indiviual valuable experience for leading a country. Probably more than one could get in the Senate or the House in less than two years.
Do you think Mr. McCain may have thought of that as one of his selection criteria?? I do.....

Posted by: Tom - Va. Beach | September 2, 2008 2:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

Thank goodness this is an opinion piece, there is no "news" here! Please spew your rhetoric under another topic other than faith! What a disgrace!

God bless the Palin Family!

Posted by: aMom | September 2, 2008 2:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You, lady, sound like a bitter, old hag. Listen to yourself. So, you don't think she should be on the ticket because she has 5 kids and a grand kid on the way? I thought feminiazis were for all this. Get a real life and then mayby you'll understand what a great choice she is.

Posted by: rafael | September 2, 2008 2:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Governor Palin is a genuine human being who has coped with and surmounted legions of real life difficulties to prevail and come out on top. Senator Obama consorts with convicted felons, does business with radical bombers, and has a white-hating minister marry him and baptise his daughters.
He is trying to mimic JFK with his Berlin speech and football stadium acceptance. He hires JFK's daughter to further the effect.
I went to Princeton and have an ivy league education as well.
I will take the real human being with the real world life over the fake JFK with a bigger closet full of skeletons any day of the week.
God bless Governor Sarah Palin

Posted by: Dr. Baron | September 2, 2008 2:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm so happy that you are such an expert that you know that she is not ready based on such a thin resume. Hmmmmm...who else has a similar problem. Let me think. Oh, nevermind, you really can't compare Obama. He has NO executive experience and has been a senator for less time than Palin has been a real executive. It is amazing that the media is jumping on this woman's inexperience while at the same time ignoring Obama's and helping hi m ascend to the democratic nomination. Journalism is truly dead. You are all shameful, small and an embarassment to your craft.

Posted by: Skippy | September 2, 2008 2:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, Sally, Sally how you miss the point. We Christian have the same problems that everyone else has, it how we confront them. I have three children, one has fought the legal system his entire life the other two are upright citizen. We gave all the three the same values and love. I think Sarah Palin will be well received by the American people. She is real and seems to experience the same problems the rest of us have. I can only judge from your comments that the problem with Sarah Palin is that she isn't liberal. The last time I looked the only qualifications for President is being a U.S. citizen and at least 35 years. I think Sarah Palin fits that catagory and I believe you and me also fits that qualification.

Posted by: Larry B | September 2, 2008 2:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is apparent that Sally Quinnn is not a Christian. If she were she would understand what forgiveness is all about. The old adage "Good girls have their babies, bad girls don't" wouldn't even sink in with someone with Quinn's mentality. The media makes an issue on Palin being too inexperienced to be the #2 on the Republican ticket. But praises the less experienced Obama for the #1 on the Demogogue ticket!! Quinn's ignorance on this matter does not surprise me. After the interview she did with Dwight N. Hopkins (Black Liberation Theology) I wouldn't expect much from Quinn. That interview is spotlighted in the book No, No, No, NOT Obama at Amazon.com If you really want to see how shameful the media are - buy the book!


Posted by: Bill Anderson | September 2, 2008 2:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama had three criteria for selecting VP: 1. Can the person be President in a moment's notice? 2. Can the person help govern? 3. Can the person challenge his thinking and provide differing opinions (not being a "yes-man")? What criteria did McCain use? How to win the election by appeasing the far right and by the thinly veiled appeal to disaffected Hillary voters. Country first? We now have to wonder about McCain's temperament and question his judgment. This was a huge gamble for McCain - and we all know he really wanted Lieberman or Ridge. For him to present someone who he only met once and who is obviously not ready for international scrutiny is exemplary of his judgment when it comes to ALL Americans. McCain surely is the riskier choice.

Posted by: FMA in Mass | September 2, 2008 2:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is not the size of Palin's trailer nor the trash she has stashed it in that concerns me most about her. It is her character and judgement in matters that she claims are so important to her that brings my concern. I am also concerned about the lack of intelligence that she parades about proudly. Nukular, and 'I only know about Alaska', 'I don't know anything about the rest of the US, 'I don't know what a Vice President does'.

And as a matter of my opinion, I would be even more terrified if Mr. Palin was tapped for VP. Of the two, Ms Palin is clearly more experienced and more intelligent. But then again I refuse to accept the lessor of two evils. They both are still going to bring us evil.

My trailer is unassuming and full of trash too, yet I am smart enough to know that I cannot take all my trash to a political stage and expect to walk away with a win without destroying my family and friends.

Posted by: sierra | September 2, 2008 2:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama is an Uncle Tom!!! Ha Ha ha Ha HA

Posted by: Obama = Good Ole Boys | September 2, 2008 2:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are sooooooooo unaware of what "values voters" think. You are very wrong that S. Palin will be disowned by the "religious right" because of what happens in so very many families and has since the beginning of time. If she had chosen an abortion, I know your attitude would be different.

And why do most presidential candidates choose a particular person as their candidate for vice president anyway? I believe usually it is to help them politcally where they have a weakness. If this is an insult, then every choice is an insult, including Biden for Obama.

You are showing your elitist thinking on this one.

Posted by: Lois | September 2, 2008 2:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Wow! Talk about over the top responses! Sure smells like an orchestrated response, perhaps an email directed campaign? Obviously, someone has calculated that sufficient screaming will induce reason to back off, and perhaps others will be deterred from expressing similar opinions. Sadly, straight from the GOP playbook of recent years.

Simple facts:

1. She was chosen for her personal appeal, which is substantial.
2. But she is clearly, laughably, under qualified to be president.

Is winning so important that winning with a loser is better than losing to a winner?

Posted by: baffled and depressed | September 2, 2008 2:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I LOVE IT! The best thing about McCain's pick is giving hipocrite liberals -LIKE YOU- the chance to show their true colors on so many issues. Had Obammy picked a woman all we would have heard would be "shatter the glass ceiling." Instead he picks a LIFELONG politician as an agent for CHANGE. HaHaHaHaHaHa!!! Hey, if McCain wants to lend his choice towards advancing women as well as his campaign, good for him. So he picks one with similar views, convictions and intolerance for PORK, good for him. Puts you bedwetting bigoted libs right where you belong - LOVE IT, LOVE IT, LOVE IT!!!!!

Posted by: Fred | September 2, 2008 2:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

LIFE is THE most important family value, and it trumps all the rest.

Roe v. Wade gave Sarah Palin and Bristol Palin a choice; the most important choice any woman will ever make.

They both chose Life for their unborn babies even though society told them they didn't have to accept that responsibility. They both considered their options and they both decided that the death of a child, even though legal, is still an unacceptable result. They both chose correctly, and they are both heroes for having shown such courage.

The fact that they were both willing to put the life of their child ahead of their own academic and political careers is breathtakingly selfless and undeniably respectable.

Sarah and Bristol Palin's humanitarian definition of Family Values is a stark and refreshing contrast to the venial and bloody alternative promoted by the Pro-Abortion death cult that now infects the political left in this country. Apparently the media has blinded themselves to this fact in their rush to sway public opinion against these two great American women.

FROM THIS DAY FORWARD Sarah and Bristol Palin shall be towering icons for the Pro-Life movement; much to the consternation of the leftist Democrats and their viciously protective Hollywood/News Media jackals.

Posted by: Britcom | September 2, 2008 2:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The public SQ we know today and respect was once the cute blonde who was unproven and many smeared by saying she leveraged her good looks to get ahead.

Years later, you get to say that breaks or not, you rose to the challenge.

It is especially ironic then that you of all opinionated commentators offer your negative bile regarding Governor Palin.

By God woman, what would you have written about a log splitter with little congressional experience?

Posted by: Before you were SQ | September 2, 2008 2:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Her 17 year old child will need her more in the coming months? What about Barack Obama's children? Or are fathers given a free pass when it comes to career versus family?

Posted by: Walt | September 2, 2008 2:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

My mother was a stay at home mom and VERY hands on. She was a great mother. I started having sex at 16. Actually pretty late when compared to young boys and girls these days. So, if I had gotten pregnant, would that have made my mother not "hands-on" enough? Or was she not involved enough simply because her teenager daughter was curious about sex? Teenagers have sex. Are you too old to remember that?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 2:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The "heartbeat away" argument is a red herring. It assumes a McCain victory which is an interesting concession and it belies the historical significance of a Vice President which was to broaden the ticket but to bury someone in a post that has no real power.
I agree with your assessment of the dilemma women have. I think it was done deliberately. Many Hillary supporters voted based upon gender and I can't imagine they would vote for an inexperienced black man who beat Hillary or Joe Biden who represents middle aged white males. I suspect many women won't vote because of the dilemma which will neutralize the disaffected Hillary supporters and work to McCain's benefit.
As far as I am concerned, being pro life trumps a pregnant daughter. And if she has demonstrated the ability to be a governor with five kids I think she can handle being a grandmother.

Posted by: Gino | September 2, 2008 2:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think what you are really in fear of is that a conservative woman will be very successful in politics without the help of the N.O.W. or anyone else (save for her family) and that because of this, you and your kind will loose even more power. God bless Sarah Palin and her family.

Posted by: Art | September 2, 2008 2:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The public SQ we know today and respect was once the cute blonde who was unproven and many smeared by saying she leveraged her good looks to get ahead.

Years later, you get to say that breaks or not, you rose to the challenge.

It is especially ironic then that you of all opinionated commentators offer your negative bile regarding Governor Palin.

By God woman, what would you have written about a log splitter with little congressional experience?

Posted by: Before you were SQ | September 2, 2008 2:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find it really odd that you founded and moderate a blog on faith and yet wonder about how the "evangelical base" and the "family values voters" will respond to the news that Gov. Palin's 17 yr old daughter is pregnant out of wedlock.

I dont even have to visit the blog to know that you have NO IDEA about issues of faith in the family values and evangelical base.

Keep up the negativity. It will absolutely backfire on your side.

Posted by: Sonny | September 2, 2008 2:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

McSame Gate coupled with Pal-Gate is more baggage than we want at this time. Did not America learn its lesson with the Clintons? It is time for a fresh start, new beginning, new dreams, new leadership. As an American, I would never be happy with a new style Qualyle Blast-from the past. If McSame does not dump her as a choice, I will vote OBama. The only experience Pal has is , uh something-CAN'T THINK OF IT RIGHT NOW... and all McSame did was try to show to the voters that a woman could be on the ballot compared to Hillary- it was a last ditch deal to try to get votes from those that were Hillary fans. Hillary voters will not just vote for anyone in a skirt. The problem is, we don't want this woman...she is not "presidential" or presidential material. She would be the laughing stock of the free world. Come on people, instead of sucking up to this choice, state your true feelings, and let the people know. This is a choice we can do without. Eight years with McSame's eye-candy, not even. His choice is a disgrace to women. What does the choice of Palin show about McSame? McCain made a choice only Hugh Hefner would be proud of. DO NOT NOMINATE-Dump her I say.

Posted by: DBubla | September 2, 2008 2:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I believe the decision is high risk. But at this point in time the Senator would never have won this election by selecting Mitt Romney. Romney though conservative would not have capture the core evangelical vote.

Posted by: db | September 2, 2008 2:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How is it that liberal female newspaper columnists claim to speak for all women? As others here have pointed out, a lot of would-be Hillary voters wouldn't vote for Sarah anyway because she doesn't reflect Hillary's liberal values.

Uh, hello, she's a Republican, so why should she? But she will attract a lot of women who don't have such a radical liberal mindset.

Posted by: Jeff Collins | September 2, 2008 2:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I look forward to the comments by RWers when Palin removes herself from the ticket in the next few days. The AIP scandal has doomed her candidacy, the pregnancy mess is just an entertaining sidebar. McCain will demand she leave, and to add insult to injury, will insist she aver it was her idea to quit, not his demand.

McCain will then opt for Lieberman, and the fundies and the Rs will have to suck it up because another debacle like the Palin mess will be completely unacceptable.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 2:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What are the right reasons. What is wrong for you might be right for me. Tell me what are the right reasons for electing Obama, I think that if he is elected, it will be for all the wrong reasons.

Posted by: Gary | September 2, 2008 2:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I thought the point of running was to win?

"But she said nothing can prepare you for the criticism and scrutiny of being in the White House. Sarah Palin is not prepared for that"

If nothing can prepare one for it then no one is qualified.

"She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome. Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?"

yeah Palin stay at home with you kids as a matter of fact all women should. Keep up the excuses of why women shouldnt have a certain job and they will never have high level positions.

Someone is a bit egocentric comparing herself to a Vice Presidentail nomine.

Posted by: Don | September 2, 2008 2:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yours is among many articles that suggests Palin has neglected her maternal duties with her arduous career choice and gaggle of children. This article suggests that she should even temper her decision to accept the VP nod because she needs to be there for her unborn grandchild. Do you not see the double standard by which your comments drip? Would you ever consider these concerns should Palin be a man? I've read very similar comments from other "liberal women" but it's comical that you don't see that you judge her differently BECAUSE she's a woman. Your hipocrisy is laughable.

Posted by: TFKY | September 2, 2008 2:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The public SQ we know today and respect was once the cute blonde who was unproven and many smeared by saying she leveraged her good looks to get ahead.

Years later, you get to say that breaks or not, you rose to the challenge.

It is especially ironic then that you of all opinionated commentators offer your negative bile regarding Governor Palin.

By God woman, what would you have written about a log splitter with little congressional experience?

Posted by: Before you were SQ | September 2, 2008 2:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

They are Mad

They are seriously Panicked

They have just Shot themselves in the foot

They Hate pro-Americans like Palin

They are literally mentally Ill

And this week they will show us all just how Sick they truly are.

Sally Stupid is just the first bit of the pure bile the MSM is about to puke out.

When they are done - Obama will be a heap on the sidelines and the media outlets will have taken another Huge hit.

Posted by: This is Fun | September 2, 2008 2:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article demonstrates the viewpoint of a person who's knowledge of conservative values is based on that defined by other liberals, not by conservatives. Therefore, her suppositions are based on how liberals would react. The stronger conservative values were demonstrated based on the action of choosing life and choosing to stand up and take responsibility. Such courage and fortitude among conservatives and those of faith do not exists in Sally Quinn's ideology. Indeed, her ideology includes ignoring the overwhelming facts that contradict her prejudice by attacking children. Sally Quinn, if you had the courage to peer through your own haze of cowardice and bigotry, you would see that John McCain did in fact select Governor Palin for her accomplishments as an experienced executive and that the evangelical support is stronger now than ever because Governor Palin's daughter chose life over death. The miracle of life is not a "punishment!"

Posted by: Grant | September 2, 2008 2:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

For heaven's sakes Sally, get over it. The woman is RUNNING A STATE! She's a governor. He picked a woman who has executive experience. You are just p.o.'d because she is more accomplished than you are. She didn't have to marry someone to make a name for herself!!

Posted by: donna | September 2, 2008 2:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally--it seems you've undermined every point you made and made my up my mind for me. I will vote for McCain Palin. Thanks so much.

Posted by: frank vineland NJ | September 2, 2008 2:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

McSame Gate coupled with Pal-Gate is more baggage than we want at this time. Did not America learn its lesson with the Clintons? It is time for a fresh start, new beginning, new dreams, new leadership. As an American, I would never be happy with a new style Qualyle Blast-from the past. If McSame does not dump her as a choice, I will vote OBama. The only experience Pal has is , uh something-CAN'T THINK OF IT RIGHT NOW... and all McSame did was try to show to the voters that a woman could be on the ballot compared to Hillary- it was a last ditch deal to try to get votes from those that were Hillary fans. Hillary voters will not just vote for anyone in a skirt. The problem is, we don't want this woman...she is not "presidential" or presidential material. She would be the laughing stock of the free world. Come on people, instead of sucking up to this choice, state your true feelings, and let the people know. This is a choice we can do without. Eight years with McSame's eye-candy, not even. His choice is a disgrace to women. What does the choice of Palin show about McSame? McCain made a choice only Hugh Hefner would be proud of. DO NOT NOMINATE-Dump her I say.

Posted by: DBubla | September 2, 2008 2:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Silly Sally,

Sarah Palin is a self-made woman. Not like Hillary who is only famous because she married Bill Clinton and rode on his coattail. It's funny to watch you try to throw Palin under the bus because she is attempting to balance work and motherhood. How anti-woman of you. Ha, ha, Sally you are a FOOL.

Posted by: Pamela | September 2, 2008 2:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Another old sexist liberal. Odd that the same architects of the decay of morality somehow always seem to drag it out when it suits them. Let me make it clear for you, dear.
Sarah Palin was right to bring her special needs kid to term.
Her daughter was wrong to have sex before marriage.
Her daughter is right to bring the child to term.
Abortion is wrong.
There is nothing cynical about picking either a woman or someone from outside the inbred beltway. Many of us think that her background is a breath of fresh air and that politics have become an end in themselves rather than a servant of the people.

Posted by: K2 | September 2, 2008 2:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My god! Yours is the fifth article on Palin I've read today by liberal journalists and you all sound like you shared one single copy of talking points handed out by the DNC. Sally, how do you look at yourself in the mirror and still have the audacity to call yourself a "journalist"? Try reading your article while substituting the words Obama and Black where appropriate. Did the college you studied journalism at ever bring up the notion of fair and balanced reporting? I'm not going to loose any sleep over your diatribe, you and your other "advocacy" journalists are the main reason that newspapers are sinking fast. Farewell!

Posted by: Eli | September 2, 2008 2:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So, essentially, the writer is saying that because she wasn't ready to be a network news anchor; Palin isn't ready for the Vice President job. Well, maybe if she had a mentor with McCain's experience she would have been more successful.

Posted by: Robdog | September 2, 2008 2:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Meow, meow, meow.

Quick,get Sally to a clean litter box...she's about to explode

Posted by: Bob | September 2, 2008 2:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hello Ms. Quinn:

It seems a little disingenuous to cite Ms. Palin's being a "heartbeat" away from the Presidency as an issue, and yet Mr. Obama isn't even a heartbeat away - he's there and has less experience than Ms. Palin.
You mentioned a "calculation" on the part of Mccain when choosing Ms. Palin, but wouldn't you consider the choice of Biden (an insider of the highest order) as a similar calculation. In addition, I admire people who have the ability to read people's minds: I only thought God could do that however. I cannot speak for why Mccain chose Ms. Palin other than the fact than what he said. Unless you have evidence to support another contention, you are speculating (probably based on your own bias)
My preference would be to see which candidates are the best candidates. Isn't that a better way to hold an election? Aren't you tired of "gutter politics? Come on Ms. Quinn, you are a journalist: you can do better.

Posted by: Tom A | September 2, 2008 2:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How do you know first of all that McCain picked her just because "she's a woman?" Can you read his mind? Second of all, after years of trying to shove "it's OK if 13 year old Johnny wants to dress like a woman" or "it's OK for Sally to have two mommies" that anyone really gives a rip over your pseudo-moralizing about a girl that's preggers?

Posted by: Tim Callahan | September 2, 2008 2:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, with all due respect I think you miss the point. Sarah is not "just" a female, which is how liberals want to perceive her on the assumption that she represents only bait for Hilary voters. But Hillary voters stand for abortion on demand, a socialist universal health care system and activist government in general...How could they vote for Sarah - whether male or female? But the undecided vote is made up of independent thinkers - and many are going to fall in love with an amazing self made woman who can hunt, fish, raise a family, and run corruption out of the state of Alaska.....imaine, she probably even BAKES COOKIES! Her attraction will not be with Hillary supporters or along gender lines, but among many Americans who want a reformer politician you can "sink your teeth into" (Like a mooseburger).. The debate on her inexperience vs. that of Obama eludes me, as - given nthat each ticket has a "youngster" - where do you want them, in the top spot - calling the shots, learning on the job, and picking a cabinet from their equally inexperienced peer group - or perhaps better in the second slot, safely absorbing the "wisdom of inside the beltway of washington" while cutting ribbons on whatever... Sarah is the most exciting thing which has happened in this race so far, and as an Obama leaning independent a week ago, my vote is now with Mccain

Posted by: BcB | September 2, 2008 2:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, This is the third story I've read from a woman writer whose rantings are empty and useless. And it appears that about 95% of the comments on the other two stories strongly disagree with the other two. writers What is it with you people. Are you women jealous of Sarah? I know, it must be her conservative, wholesome, anti-radical feminist lifestyle that she has lead. As far as her qualifications to lead a nation; her experience as an executive of the state of Alaska and the rest of the experience on her resume MORE than qualifies her to lead this nation, if called to do so. I'd stack her qualifications over Obama's ANY day of the week.

Posted by: Mr. Bee | September 2, 2008 2:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Old lady Sally is really really mad, that means Palin was a good choice.

Posted by: jeff | September 2, 2008 2:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My god! Yours is the fifth article on Palin I've read today by liberal journalists and you all sound like you shared one single copy of talking points handed out by the DNC. Sally, how do you look at yourself in the mirror and still have the audacity to call yourself a "journalist"? Try reading your article while substituting the words Obama and Black where appropriate. Did the college you studied journalism at ever bring up the notion of fair and balanced reporting? I'm not going to loose any sleep over your diatribe, you and your other "advocacy" journalists are the main reason that newspapers are sinking fast. Farewell!

Posted by: Eli | September 2, 2008 2:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

From Donald ... "Sarah Palins resume includes.... a BA in journalism, a city council member, Mayor of a small town of 5000 people (when she was mayor). Governor for 18 months of a state with 600,000 people."

If Only she could replace all of that executive experience with being a "community organizer"! Would that convince you? LOLOLOL ... Community organizer?!?! Stop, you're killin me!

Posted by: Gary | September 2, 2008 2:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Good job,

You just put women back hundreds of years...they should be barefoot and pregnant.

The hypocrisy of LIE berals is amazing. You havve a clown running for president that supports and WANTS infanticide...killing babies that are a result of a bothched abortion...a person who had an extremist co-conspirartor Mulsim Jehaidist speak aas the keynote speaker for the interfaith elelment of the Demowhacko party. And the list goes on.

Doyou have kids? Then you're satin for working. Ypu should be a leave it to beaver mom and do what your husband says...if you're divorced, I can see why. No "real" man wants a submersive unethical, unintelligent woman to be there and ciontribute nothing except cooking and sex.

You're whack as are all of your readers who believe this crap.

I bet:
1.) This paper is losing readers at a historic rate.
2.) this paper is losing advertisiers at the same rate.
3.) Your financials are hemorraging.

Ask yourself? Why is it?

The answer....writing garbage like this. So go home, put a roast in the oven, dress sexy and do what your man says....if you even have one

Posted by: Billy | September 2, 2008 2:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey hobag, how do you know first of all that McCain picked her just because "she's a woman?" Can you read his mind? Second of all, after years of trying to shove "it's OK if 13 year old Johnny wants to dress like a woman" or "it's OK for Sally to have two mommies" that anyone really gives a crap over your pseudo-moralizing about a girl that's preggers?

Posted by: Jimmy Dooshette | September 2, 2008 2:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Got through about 100 comments...what is it, about 15:1 against the author? Man, I like the chances for McCain/Palin in November.

Posted by: MGCC | September 2, 2008 2:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The elephant in the convention hall is the misjudgement of John McCain. He would have us believe that the issues enumerated by Sally Quinn were of no consequence, because it was imperative to pick the best running mate in the United States to fill out the Republican ticket. Surely there are thousands of Republican men and women of ability and commitment who find this ludicrous and offensive. To try to convince the American people that he has found the perfect person to be one heartbeat from the presidency of a melanoma-prone 72 year old is going to take more time than McCain had planned to spend on that spin. This is such a disturbing pick that I don't believe she will survive the process. She may be dumped at the convention or "quit for the good of the ticket," but I can't believe she can run the whole race.

Posted by: Dr. Buddy Quinn | September 2, 2008 2:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is interesting that Quinn claims this nomonee does not solidify the base. I have talked to dozens in the base and they are VERY pleased with this choice. Many of them who had said they were going to stay home, are now excited.

ALL the weaknesses Paulin have, Obamah have. If she is not qualified to be vp, how is that Obamah is qualified to be president...NOT a heart beat away. Setting the resumes side by side: Obamah vs. Paulin: about even, oh yeah...Obamah is not running against Paulin, it is McCain...Resume winner is McCain.

Family values and responsibilities reside only in the mother!?! Come into the 21st century!

Feminists have been preaching for years there is no difference or men need to do more. The Paulin's are living their values and dealing with events and situation as they come.

Honesty & objectivity is needed from the American press.

Posted by: BeetleB | September 2, 2008 2:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

While many of the points made are valid concerns, those questions would not be asked or asked in a very different way if the VP nominee was a man with five children (including a special needs child).

Posted by: Janice Kay McClendon | September 2, 2008 2:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You missed Palin's crusade against corruption, (even within her own party), as a motivation for McCain's pick. Why? this is the most obvious. It tacks well with McCain's own 'Maverick - Independent' streak. Your omission is revealing is it not? Rather you peg it as a cynical choice - because she is a woman? You seem to be rather gender self absorbed.

Posted by: Jerry | September 2, 2008 2:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Enough of a hands-on mother? Are you kidding? More time "mothering" does not correlate with kids who have problems and often it will create more problems as teenagers strive to individuate from their parents.

That argument just doesn't hold water.

Posted by: Jae | September 2, 2008 2:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I quote you:

"It is a choice made to try to win an election"

Now there is an accusation that cuts to the heart of what is wrong with this selection. You are so right, the dastardly McCain has made a move to enhance his election chances.... thank you for pointing out what a rat he is. So many of us were ignorant and thought that candidates were supposed to do things to win elections. But now we know better. Where would be without your original insights?

Posted by: JimAroo | September 2, 2008 2:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's amusing to read all the liberal columnists pontificating on what the conservatives should be thinking about the nomination of Sarah Palin. Not a single conservative has yet said anything in agreement with the liberal pontification. Eat your heart out.

Posted by: Jay | September 2, 2008 2:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Donald says:

"Oh no a drudge linked article..."

That's right, Donny-boy. That means the discussion will take place outside the boundaries of your metrosexual liberal sewing-circle, outside your little Democrat-love-fest clique which you're so used to.

Now you got a real sample of the population commenting, not to mention that the warped and hypocrisy-laden liberal rhetoric is being dragged out into the light for all to scrutinize.

Oh, the horror!

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 2:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is either on the rag or having a hot flash.

Posted by: Buick from Boca | September 2, 2008 2:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wasn't Obama born to an 18 year old unwed mother?

It is staggering, the level of misunderstanding that the elite left has for the values and psyche of middle America. Sally dear, YOU ARE LOST on your analysis! Your opinion piece is more Huffington Post, or maybe Daily Kos, than thoughtful deliberation.

McCain/Palin will win by more than 2% nationally in November. Libs: GET SET FOR FOUR MORE YEARS OF THE GOP!

Posted by: center of liberal stupidity | September 2, 2008 2:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

1. Who says she was picked "simply because she is a woman?" In truth, I don't think McCain's VP pick was nearly as insulting to women as short sighted articles like this one that threaten to set woman back 50 years. So ladies, when we are still stuck under that glass ceiling, you have people like Ms. Quinn to thank. Thank you, Ms Quinn, for caring more about this season's politics than the long term equality and opportunity available to millions of women in America, and our daughters. You claim to represent the interests of women, but the simple fact is you don't. Be consistent. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

2. Mrs Quinn forgets that Obama would rather see babies that survive an abortion be left in a dirty closet to die alone rather than allow one of his daughters to be "punished with a baby;" To use his own words. Sarah Palin's daughter is choosing to keep her baby and accept it as a blessing rather than a "punishment." It seems to me that the Palin's have instilled in their daughter the strength of character to own up to her mistakes and accept the responsibility that comes with her choices. I wonder which point of view evangelical women will approve of?

3. Obama is running against McCain, not Sarah Palin. Lets compare apples to apples and take a look at the experience levels on the tops of the tickets. You can't legitimately compare the experience of one PRESIDENTIAL candidate to that of the other VICE PRESIDENTIAL candidate, and expect any thinking American to buy it. The talking points are so thinly veiled, it's pathetic...and desperate. So, Joe Biden has more experience than Sarah Palin, but Obama doesn't, and he certainly doesn't have more than McCain. No matter how you look at it on the experience end, it doesn't look good for Obama.

4. Shame on you for questioning Gov. Palin as a mother. Every time I think the media in this country has sunk to it's lowest, it surprises me with some new disgrace. Or maybe you think that women should remain barefoot in the kitchen until their children are of a certain age. Let me ask you Ms. Quinn, did you stay barefoot in your kitchen? To me, it looks like the only one insulting women and holding back opportunities here, is you.

Posted by: Trisha | September 2, 2008 2:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a born-again Christian, I fully agree with Ms. Quinn's commentary. I believe the GOP have been highly hypocritical regarding the experience debate, and now supports a candidate who seems to be too busy to attend the needs of her family TODAY - not to mention if she becomes VP.

I'm tired of this baseless argument that under 2 years as governor of a small-population state (and even two terms as mayor of a very small suburb) puts her ahead of Obama - a US Senator in the thick of the national debate. Common sense dictates otherwise. The GOP once said that Bill Clinton wasn't qualified because he was a "small state" governor in 1992. The Little Rock metro area alone has a greater population that ALL of Alaska.

All indications are this was a reckless choice. Can we really trust McCain under far more pressure as our president?

Posted by: Long Man | September 2, 2008 2:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn:
My reaction to your article was shock then anger. You assess Sarah Palin as bright and successful but then you assume she will be the miserable failure at her "opportunity" as you were at your CBS venture. Here is a woman that has become mother of five, one child with special needs, and has proven to be an effective governor. You on the other hand display no outstanding skills and, by your own admission can barely take care of one child.
I'm afraid you are way out of her league. I can't wait until the vice presidential debates take place. Sarah Palin will be a formidable candidate. I'll be watching, but reading your column no longer. You are too jealous and critical of a real middle class american woman to be an effective voice.

Posted by: D. M. M. Nick | September 2, 2008 2:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn,

As a 63 year old Hispanic male, who speaks English as a second language and proud American by Choice since 1973, I would like to respond to your very erudite blog "Palin's Pregnancy Problem".

After a lot of thought & thorough analysis it is obvious to this casual observer that "You just don't get it". My unsolicited advice to you & your unknown predicament is to secure a leave of absence from the Beltway or NYC and simply live for a few years anywhere in Middle America.

My best regards & wishing you life success,

Sincerely yours

Posted by: Gaston in Florida | September 2, 2008 2:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a born-again Christian, I fully agree with Ms. Quinn's commentary. I believe the GOP have been highly hypocritical regarding the experience debate, and now supports a candidate who seems to be too busy to attend the needs of her family TODAY - not to mention if she becomes VP.

I'm tired of this baseless argument that under 2 years as governor of a small-population state (and even two terms as mayor of a very small suburb) puts her ahead of Obama - a US Senator in the thick of the national debate. Common sense dictates otherwise. The GOP once said that Bill Clinton wasn't qualified because he was a "small state" governor in 1992. The Little Rock metro area alone has a greater population that ALL of Alaska.

All indications are this was a reckless choice. Can we really trust McCain under far more pressure as our president?

Posted by: Long Man | September 2, 2008 2:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?"

I agreed with you that it seems hypocritical to make such a move. However, this in no way eliminates the inexperience debate.

This move by Senator McCain makes those who would not otherwise question Senator Obama's experience take a deeper look at what he has actually accomplished. To be honest, Governer Palin and Senator Obama are not too different when it comes to their polical record. The only difference is, Senator Palin is running for Vice President while Senator Obama is looking to become the next Commander-in-Chief.

It is a shame I cannot vote for Biden-Obama...

Posted by: Josh | September 2, 2008 2:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You seem to be against the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message (about the wife submitting to the husband). That is your right. But it's based on Biblical principals. As a moderator of OnFaith, it seems somewhat hypocritical to bash the beliefs of Christians.

Palin has more executive office experience than Obama, and the pregnancy of her 17 year-old daughter is no more relevant than Obama's admitted cocaine use when he was 17. In fact, it's less relevant because Palin's daughter is not running for office.

The negative attention Palin is recieving is probably going to work in her favor, since it seems her family is being viewed as the normal American household by many.

Face it. The reason many liberals are upset with Palin is not based on her family history or her politics - it's because the announcement of her selection took all the hot air out of Obama's balloon. His "big speech" is now in the value bin at Wal-Mart, next to the Dokken CDs.

Posted by: Mike Garcia | September 2, 2008 2:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Typical, you are saying the same thing most liberal women are saying. McCain picked her because she is a woman. She's not ready to be president. Would you be saying these things if Obama had picked a woman (not Hillary)? NO! you say she will make a fool of herself and make women look bad, which is really the cruxt of the matter. You don't care wether or not Palin will do a bad job, you only care that she might make women look bad.
And by the way, the fact that her daughter is pregnant and not married is regretable, but it is not bad. It shows great character and superb upbringing that Bristol is doing the right thing and word in Wasilla is that the young couple have been engaged for some time. You should not comment on things you know nothing about. Someone who refers to Christians as "Republican conservative family-values crowd" shows how ignorant you are.

Posted by: jpl | September 2, 2008 2:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Funny how feminists are all for women when those women are liberals. She has more experience than obama...and just because you failed miserably as a newscaster, she is destined to fail as VP?

Please give me back 5 minutes of my life for reading that terrible article.

Posted by: Ha tofunny | September 2, 2008 2:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Washington Post is old news - I want the Enquirer's take on this!

Posted by: Steve | September 2, 2008 2:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There had to be serious and thorough discussions on her giving birth to a down symdrone child. Having an abortion would be policital suicide. Having the baby would enhance her self image with the anti-abortion groups. So, the advantages of her carrying this baby to term was definitely part of the decision making.

Posted by: William | September 2, 2008 2:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh no a drudge linked article, filled with thousands of comments by the dumbest people America has to offer.

Palin is a dittohead, thats why she was picked. Rush Limbaugh was pushing her on his radio show, so she will satisfy the evangelical vote.
The problem with this is that she is completely unqualified to be President. Just because you are a party hack that will excite evangelical voters, doesnt qualify you to be President.

Sarah Palins resume includes.... a BA in journalism, a city council member, Mayor of a small town of 5000 people (when she was mayor). Governor for 18 months of a state with 600,000 people. Wow that sounds like a brilliant decision right? Lets nominate some dittohead newbie!! Thats a ticket I can believe in!

Truly a odd decision, and one that puts the United States at risk.

Posted by: Donald | September 2, 2008 2:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally dear, you are breathtakingly ignorant on this issue.

Her treatment of her own special needs child and the welcoming of her own grandchild is less than ideal circumstances is a perfect test and testimony of her actual views on family values. She handled and is handling these with wisdom, consistency, love and resolve. She is doing everything exactly right. Sally, family values is not about preaching to others on how to live, rather it is about how you make decisions. I assume that you would tidy both of these matters over with an abortion. Coward.

I am in the base you speak of. Her daughter sinned (look the word up, I assume it is out of your lexicon). God will forgive her this sin if she asks Him. She will suffer some of the consequences of this sin; her life will be much more complicated for a time, but I rejoice in the new life and in her moral decision to bring it into the world. I love people that speak with their actions.

Posted by: SyLentze | September 2, 2008 2:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Clearly, ms. Quinn has no clue what family values are. That an "unwed mother" exists is in her universe an abomination, since liberal family values consist of partial birth abortions of anything conceived before their pot-smoking, Chavez-loving parents' 35th birthday.

Posted by: Johan | September 2, 2008 2:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Kudos to Sally Quinn for having the guts to say what the conservative talking heads won't. Just when I was getting use to the idea of voting for John McCain, he lost my vote. He showed once again, a lack of judgement in choosing Palin. Knowing the situation with Palin's pregnant 17 year old daughter and choosing her anyway angers me when there were so many other excellent candidates. As a parent, it's difficult enough to raise children with great values and morals when we are constantly barraged by the Hollywood left with the garbarge on television and other media sources. Call me old fashioned. Call me elitist. But this sets a hideous example for our kids. "Look Mom, even the vice-president's 17 year old daughter got pregnant. It must not be so bad." The last 8 years with the Bush's in the White House as opposed to the previous 8 years with Bill Clinton, was refreshing, to say the least. Here we go again.

Posted by: Phyllis V. | September 2, 2008 2:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your site tells me it will not accept my posting because I have already posted too many. ONE. MY FIRST ONE!

O well, so much for integrity!


Posted by: Robert L. Swanson | September 2, 2008 2:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, it does not matter how "hands on" of a mother you maybe. Statistics show that a good portion of our teenagers are having sex at a younger age. You can be there all day every day for your children and they are still going to take a risk, because that is what teenagers do. They experiment, they challenge and try to find establish their independence. We have all been there. Even if Palin was a stay at home mom, do you think that the same situation would not have happened? Please!!!!!! What you are implying is that Palin should give up her career and be a nice stay at home mommy and this would never have happened. I don't think so..... With all do respect for women whether they are at stay at home mothers or not, we as women have come too far to be pushed back in that mold again unless it is our own personal choice. Give millions of the hard working women in this world credit for what they have accomplished. We struggle every day with our choices and don't need to be continually questioned.

Posted by: Nikki | September 2, 2008 2:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't believe that you really understand the "Family Values" view. As one who hold character and family values in very high regard, I find Palin's response to her Daughter's pregnancy admirable. In contrast to Obama's comment regarding his own daughters hypothetical pregnancy... I believe he said that he would not want his daughters to be punished with a child. Those who read the Bible recognize that a child is a gift from God, not a punishment. Even when that child comes in sinful ways (The Bible is clear that sex is reserved for marriage). The Palin family are dealing with this with a strength of Character that I find refreshing. I for one was tempted to stay home on election day. But not anymore. I am excited about voting now.

Posted by: DW | September 2, 2008 2:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What an amazing and egotistical diatribe, especially in a blog titled "On Faith". Your unbridled anger is most unbecoming in this venue. You seem to be limiting a woman's ability to serve based on her family. Is one or two children OK for a woman to serve her country? How about all the women who serve in the military and leave behind children during deployments? Are they wrong?

The difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama in terms of experience is quite clear. Sarah Palin held elected office in an executive position five years before Barack Obama first held elected office in a legislative position. Sarah has run a state with very important energy considerations for the future of our nation. Barack Obama has never held an executive position. He has never been the person who had to make the call without anyone else to fall back on. For that matter neither has Joe Biden. McCain's only executive experience is in the Navy. In regards to executive experience, Sarah Palin is more qualified than the other three to hold the greatest executive position on earth.

I've always believed that Governors were far more suited for the Presidency than Senators. Perhaps the best would be someone who had been both a Senator and a Governor. Unfortunately, no one is running with those dual qualifications.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 2:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Guess the only women who can fit Ms. Quinn's bill is single, because she mustn't have any relationships because that might cause her to lose sight of what she is doing as V.P. (after all women can't control their emotions like guys can). Women can't balance those items now can they Ms. Quinn? The husband can't take care of the kids, now can he? That's the womens role...please ladies stay barefoot and pregs and never try to enter the oval ofice unless you are serving the male President.

Posted by: Just Thinking | September 2, 2008 2:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah was a wonderful choice.

She IS the America we feel good about. She is refreshing and uplifting, and unlike the many liberal feminist(?) who marry rich men to get them to the top.

God Bless Sarah and her family. My heart goes out to them.

Oh, and my middle finger goes out to the Obama stooges for their disgusting conduct ahd treatment of Sarah's family.

You'd think the reckless conduct of the Kennedy kids and the unfortunate life of George McGovern's daughter would have given them cause to lay off the children. I guess their hateful hearts overwhelmes their compassion.

Posted by: Johnny | September 2, 2008 2:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

i would happily give up my guns if the libs would give up abortions....

Posted by: ratdog51 | September 2, 2008 2:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The mother's birth of a Down Syndrome Baby is important. I agree that generally personal life issues and family issues that involve the children of that family are best considered off limits in political discourse. Except in this situation when a definite act of judgement is exercised. WHAT DID SHE KNOW? WHEN DID SHE KNOW IT? WHAT DID SHE DO? Did she actually have a broken membrane in Texas? Did she actually give this speech in that condition? Did she actually take the 8-10 flight to Alaska in that condition? Did she bypass Anchorage hospitals and drive the extra time required to get to her city? If all this was actually done, she is guilt of a massive misjudgment of solid conventional wisdom regarding childbirth. This has significance as to the nature of her wisdom and judgment generally. If none of this true, it needs to be shown definitively to not have happened.

Posted by: Robert L. Swanson | September 2, 2008 2:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

No matter what the GOP picks, media like yours will expose negativism. Good news is no news, unless you are a Democrat. No matter what they say, you don't analyzed. Is like the blinds leading the blinds. I wish I could knew what your Journalism teachers say, if there any.

Posted by: humberto hernandez | September 2, 2008 2:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, even though you are a adept writer, this is clearly a case of you simply trying to create propaganda for your political beliefs.

You never mention Barack Obama's jarring lack of political experience which consists entirely experience which consists of about 150 working days in the senate. During that time, he was did not pass any meaningful legislation, and essentially ran for president starting on day one.

Governor Palin has experience as the chief executive of a state. She is more qualified than Obama to be President.


Why don't you mention that? Why are you cherry picking? Please be honest!

Posted by: Baboonhead | September 2, 2008 2:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So let me get this straight...people are judging her by her age and experience (or lack thereof). What you're doing here is discrediting your own candidate-Obama. Obama has less governing, foreign policy, and economic experience than Palin. At least Palin has EXECUTIVE experience! You left wing nut-jobs kill me! Obama's record is non-existent. Take this VP pick for what it is...REAL CHANGE! Palin has risen to the top by challenging and smashing her competition on both sides of the aisle, most notably the republican hierarchy in Alaska. She has "de-corrupted" the Alaskan government and can start the same CHANGE in Washington! She's the REAL maverick! The REAL candidate for CHANGE!!

McCain/Palin '08!!!

Posted by: Markus | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm commenting on only the first portion of your article-- that's all I could stomach. Since you obviously don't know what is important to a conservative evangelical voter, I'll tell you: I'm not wigging out because a 17-year-old got pregnant. As a conservative evangelical, I know what it's like to make mistakes. We're not perfect (which appears to be your standard [unevenly applied, I'm sure], not mine). What matters is what you do when you mess up. That's where character applies.

I'm excited by the prospect of Sarah Palin. What I've learned about her (not knowing anything about her prior to last Friday), I've been very impressed.

Interesting that your blog is "on faith"... we apparently have a difference of opinion about what "faith" is as well.

Posted by: scott bronstad | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Clinton being the first trailer trash president opened up the floodgates. Just pick anybody off the Jerry Springer show and as long as they can give a good speech run 'em for President or Vice President.

Posted by: Danny K. | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article is truly embarrassing. Ms. Quinn appears to be someone with anger issues. The Washington Post should do a better job of reviewing what it prints if it is to continue the guise of being a credible newspaper.

Posted by: Dean in Wisconsin | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow you must be really worried she will be the next VP- since the WP readership and profitability drop every quarter you better quit and cash out of your company stock

Posted by: Jill Lengolier | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I wonder if her husband was picked, if you would have the same concerns. I love the left's concern about family values now that is funny!

To suggest Christians will not vote for her is from someone who must not be one. Obama has less expereince than Ms. Palin and is on the top of the ticket. Biden is rather old himself but, yet no one mentions his age.

Ahhhhh! The bias of the media.

Posted by: JM | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The criticism that this woman, who has held an executive, leadership office in state government is less than qualified is revealing...Bill Clinton was the governor of Arkansas before becoming President. How is Palin less qualified? If she were a man, would she be more qualified? This is sexism, coming from the feminists.

Posted by: MDF | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

An article full of pure liberal hypocrisy. Sally, dear, go back and review what you wrote about John Edwards and his nefarious behavior. He not only was a having a cheap, backstreet affair, his wife was dying of cancer, but you didn't think these would have been too much burden for a man running for President--not Vice President.
Pitiful!!

Posted by: Colin Richardson | September 2, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is almost as if McCain intentionally sabotaged his campaign with this choice. Plain was vetted enough for him to have known the very young daughter was immorally pregnant. If Palin stays on the ticket, McCain is toast. If Palin steps down, McCain is even bigger toast because the replacement will forever be thought of as the go-nowhere 'second choice'. McCain is dead in the water. What a strange turn of events this has been.

Posted by: Immoral Pregnancy | September 2, 2008 2:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

Just because you were not ready for the "Big Time" does not mean that Sarah Palin is not. I noticed her over a month ago and was very impressed. She has wonderful leadership qualities and handles herself extremely well when presented with difficult questions and issues. She has lead the State of Alaska and I believe she has done a very good job. Was Bill Clinton ready to be President after being Governor of Arkansas? Personally, I think she would make an outstanding President and I beleive that is the biggest fear from the "Left", that after 8 years as the VP she will be the first US Woman president. The basic thought of that is driving the left nuts, they will stop at nothing to prevent her from becoming the VP. Just like you, they will do and say some evil things all because they do not want a Republican to become the first Woman President. I see nothing but fear in their eyes...

Posted by: Chris Meyer | September 2, 2008 2:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Jeez Sally, you really brought the 'family values' crowd out of their hidey holes, didn't you?

Well, they voted for Bush twice, so what in the world would you expect? You think they all of a
sudden got smarter, or something?

Not a chance......

Posted by: common sense | September 2, 2008 2:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am very disappointed with McCain's choice. It's an obvious attempt at "softening" his ticket. He truly is a panderer's panderer. Pandering to conservative republicans while at the same time pandering to estranged Clinton supporters. It's a WIN-WIN!...or is it? It think this pick is going to back-fire on him in a big way. She's easy on the eyes, but I think she will prove to be McCain's Deadliest Catch.

Posted by: Richard Flynn | September 2, 2008 2:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The criticism that this woman, who has held an executive, leadership office in state government is less than qualified is revealing...Bill Clinton was the governor of Arkansas before becoming President. How is Palin less qualified? If she were a man, would she be more qualified. This is sexism, coming from the feminists.

Posted by: MDF | September 2, 2008 2:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I wonder if her husband was picked, if you would have the same concerns. I love the left's concern about family values now that is funny!

To suggest Christians will not vote for her is from someone who must not be one. Obama has less expereince than Ms. Palin and is on the top of the ticket. Biden is rather old himself but, yet no one mentions his age.

Ahhhhh! The bias of the media.

Posted by: JM | September 2, 2008 2:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Here's the bottom line -- Palin did not raise her children correctly. The first thing you tell a young daughter is -- keep the legs SHUT! This is not to mention the series of talks that need to occur around the importance of marriage before sex, and respect for the body. This effectively rules out her running on a ticket that highlights family values and high morals. The problem for McCain is that he'll look worse if he forces her off the ticket and chooses 'again'. McCain may not recover from this serious gaffe.

Posted by: Immoral Pregnancy | September 2, 2008 2:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am not a big fan of McCain, but after reading your article and others like it, I will vote for him. In fact if I die between now and then, I will come back from the dead to vote for him.

Posted by: WorkingMother | September 2, 2008 2:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

New Bumper-Sticker


POW-WOW'08


Prisoner of war - Wonder Woman

Posted by: ms helga | September 2, 2008 2:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,
Is the Washington Post using you for their agenda? Sure sounds like it. You know, you can spin all you want........however, I find Gov. Palin
a breath of fresh air.......I hope she can survive the vipers .......... and what they will put her family through........It is a shame good people
have not stepped up to the plate because how vicious Washington and the Media is........... and now comes Ms. Palin, whom I respect her accomplishments
and have no doubt she is bright, intelligent and able to be a quick study, however, worry she is tough enough to let the negative crap go by.
I, a woman voter, who previously did not know what I would do in the fall, will vote for McCain/Palin..... I pray for them and our country.
I resent how you categorize and stereotype, and insult my intelligence.
I cannot believe a so called "expert" on religion, (is that what you are?) would
print something like this....... I guess everyone has their opinion, like everyone has a nose.
Actually, reflecting on your comments.............it reminds me of the Pharisees in Jesus day......
dead bones....
Fran Boyle
Traverse City, Michigan

Posted by: Fran Boyle | September 2, 2008 2:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Pig-pile om Palin! the media's hypocracy is so extreme they do not even know how hypocritical they are! the ONLY reason why this story is still in the press is because liberals are mad that Bristol has decided to keep the baby i.e. not abort it. Liberals.....what a joke.

Posted by: ajsdaddy | September 2, 2008 2:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

get real....it has little bearing. God bless gov palin and her family...you libs have got it dead wrong.

Posted by: pop_pop502hotmail.com | September 2, 2008 2:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

your a pathetic woman

Posted by: jah | September 2, 2008 2:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I was a teenage mother who did not have the support of my mother until my daughter and I were older. One of the reasons I became pregnant ahead of schedule was because my parents did not pay attention to what I was doing. So to say that I am an ultra involved mom in my daughers life is an understatment.

I am pro choice because it boggles my mind that the right gets upset about the government taking their guns away but sees nothing wrong with taking out bodies away? Bristol and Levi should be able to enjoy responsible sex that doesnt lead to babies. I just hope that she doesnt become the next Jamie Lynne Spears stalked by photographers and I do not think it was fair of her mother to drag her into this type of spotlight. Take it from me, having a baby when you are young is tough enough without the entire world laughing at the entire country because of your actions.

Posted by: Becky | September 2, 2008 2:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,


Is the Washington Post using you for their agenda? Sure sounds like it. You know, you can spin all you want........however, I find Gov. Palin
a breath of fresh air.......I hope she can survive the vipers .......... and what they will put her family through........It is a shame good people
have not stepped up to the plate because how vicious Washington and the Media is........... and now comes Ms. Palin, whom I respect her accomplishments
and have no doubt she is bright, intelligent and able to be a quick study, however, worry she is tough enough to let the negative crap go by.
I, a woman voter, who previously did not know what I would do in the fall, will vote for McCain/Palin..... I pray for them and our country.

I resent how you categorize and stereotype, and insult my intelligence.

I cannot believe a so called "expert" on religion, (is that what you are?) would
print something like this....... I guess everyone has their opinion, like everyone has a nose.
Actually, reflecting on your comments.............it reminds me of the Pharisees in Jesus day......
dead bones....

Fran Boyle
Traverse City, Michigan

Posted by: Frances Boyle | September 2, 2008 2:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So Joe Biden is the "VP for change" and not a "political gimmick".

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008 2:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The story of Joseph finding that Mary is with child and not wanting her to face the "Law" raises the question about a women who would let her daughters sitution be known to the world rather than protect her.

Posted by: Roy | September 2, 2008 2:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well as a born again Christian myself,and being 71 and still in the process of raising 12 children,i find you pretty judgemental.
From what i see i guess you think a man who has 143 days in congress qualifies him to be President,and he one of the most liberal one at that,who to me after listening to him and all he is going to do "for us",he sounds just too very much like a devout Socialist,prokilling of babys,take from the haves and redistribute to the so-called poor and middle class.
Big oil is not 12 old men sitting on a Mountain top somewhere raking in the money. The oil business is many Stock holders who are just everyday workers who have savings in 401ks of which many are probably in oil.
Then he wants to up other taxes like on capital gains,well there goes our retirement,and its not much,it only came due to me losing family members to a drunk driver,and that settlement was very low.
Having been a miner and laborer and other low wage work,a veteran,for 50 some years,how can Obamma and his also rich wife really know what its like down on the ground in a mine or ditch. His wife makes 6 figures a year.
Where is his experience ? in the state level,and working for a street organization Acorn.
That qualifies him to be President,who is Obamma really ? A very left wing radical liberal,who couldn't hear the hate garbage coming out of his pastors mouth for 20 years,WOW!.can we afford a deaf President at 3 am ?
Plus if his daughters get pregnant they shouldn't be bothered with a un wanted child that may hold them back ?
He reminds me of a silver tongued devil,tell a lie long enough and the masses will believe every word of it and he and his democratic followers have bitten it hook line and sinker,i have never seen such worship and grovelling before,adoration,its as tho he were a god of some sort,does a King of Israel come to mind who spoke as tho a god were present.
He says one day America is the greatest country on earth,and then wants to "CHANGE" it,make up your mind,which is it ?
The Government is going to solve all our needs? or is it wants ? there is a difference.
Remember Congress passes the laws not the President and if he vetos a bill they can over ride it if they really think they should,instead of blaming everything on him.
I am insulted by you and others like you who have said these things in your report.
I think she have plenty of what it takes to be both Vice Pres. and Pres. More than Obamma.
Are you not upset that a majority of blacks will vote for Obamma just because hes black ?
I and my wife worked seven days a week many hours a day and all our children are very good people,some in military,some in college,some home makers and some in the work force. But you think Mrs Palin can't do both ?
Experience,why did Obamma get Biden to run with him ? because he has no experience in many more ways the does Palin. Besides thats why Presidents have Cabinet members and "advisors",they don't decide things all on their own.
Now if Mc Cain had asked Colin Powell,everyone would say he just got a Blackman because he wants to be Pres. well they both want to be,and will do whatever it takes to get there.
Bill Clinton after he lied about his opposion,was heard to say "you have to what you have to do"...my my and the voters put him in twice and tried hard to get his wife in...lesson not learned.
Judge not lest you also be judged,only harsher fo9r setting yourself up to be a judge...I could go on but i feel it will fall on deft ears anyway..
I am sick of hearing the lame excuse, of being a heart beat away...hey Biden is 66...DUH! he's nor spring chicken and he would be a heart beat away.
We want a real outsider,not a same ole insider good ole boy stuff.,She brings a true breath of FRESH AIR to DC. DC has become a cesspool of professional politicians who rub each others backs for favors,and Obamma is from that ilk.
Its about time a far westerner and small town person finally got in that office who really represents us.
Question,why is it if you are a rightwing conservative, gun owning, prolife,prodeath penalty person the medias potray us as evil ? but! if your antigun,anti death penalty,radical leftwing liberal for killing baby human beings,pro homosexual,socialist leaning your a great person ?...vote for Robinhood Obamma if you want more BIG Government control over your life and more socialism in America

Posted by: Jakal | September 2, 2008 2:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I've read quite a few comments regarding McCain's selection and have been scratching my head by many of the posts. Namely, Mr Obama is by far the least qualified, least experienced presidential candidate of a major party in memory. That is not a knock, but objectively true. Likewise, Mrs Palin is the least experienced and least qualified vp candidate in memory.

While both Obama and Palin have experiences, their experiences are different.

However inexperienced Mrs Palin may be, she does have a record of doing the things she claims, cutting waste and targeting corruption. While Mr. Obama is running on a message of change, what precisely has he changed? Moreover, as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's Subcommittee on European Affairs, his committee has not yet convened and has had no policy hearings since he took over as its chairman in 2006. This is very troubling!

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 2:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is a similar position???
"I was once in a similar position. After four years of reporting at the Washington Post, I was chosen by CBS to be the first network anchorwoman in America, to co-anchor their Morning News."
Get off your high-horse lady. This is part of the reason the feminist movement has lost so much steam and the young women of America are disenfranchised with it. No matter what women do to advance, the fem-nazis find something wrong and "offensive" about it. Grow-up, get a life.

Posted by: Kaare | September 2, 2008 2:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Speaker of the House 9% Approval and slipping every time she opens her stupid mouth or refuses to open up our oil fields.

Gov of Alaska 86% Approval.

Ouch!!!!

Read that again. . .

Oh and Obama's mom was pregnant and unmarried at 17 and Obama was crack head at 17 so just shut up.

Posted by: Slap From Reality | September 2, 2008 2:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow. What terrible journalism. Evangelicals are supporting the Palin's decision to have the baby, they aren't against it at all. Party bias is no reason to write such stupid articles with little to no research. I mean, does her daughter getting pregnant mean shes not a hands on mother? Not at all! Her daughter made a mistake (if you even want to call it that) and she is handling it in a very responsible matter.

Then she questions Palin's expertise on foreign policy. She has the same credentials as Obama on this matter: None!

Same old biased crap Quinn.

Posted by: kman | September 2, 2008 2:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

John McCain has continued to prove that we are not wrong in our assessment of him, and the Republican party's "Win-at-all-cost" brand of politics.

Sally Quinn said it all: Obama is not "experienced" enough for McCain yet he McCain is comfortable putting this inexperienced, new kid on the block a heart beat away from the presidency - literally - considering McCain's age and health situation.

Posted by: Ambrose Nwankwo - Ikoyi, Lagos | September 2, 2008 2:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So Obama, a man with small children, with virtually zero experience (zero military experience, zero executive experience, 3 years in the senate spent running for president) IS qualified for President, but Palin, a WOMAN with small children, with 6 years of executive level experience, with more years of elected service than Obama, is not qualified to be VP? Why? Because she is a woman? Because she is conservative?

Posted by: Gary Miller | September 2, 2008 2:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Governor Palin has more executive experience and more achievements to her credit than Obama and Biden combined! She is a great American and a real person. The choice of her as the Republican VP candidate and the media's response has really exposed the shameful Liberal bias of the mainstream media which includes the Washington Post. You know Governor Palin is a great candidate and you are desperate to stop her, so you resort to slinging mud like some cheap tabloid. Shame on you!!

Posted by: Bob, Texas | September 2, 2008 2:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S MANIFESTO

1. You have to believe the AIDS virus is spread by lack of Federal funding.

2. You have to believe that the school system that can't teach a fourth grader how to read is some how the best qualified to teach those same children all about sex.

3. You have to believe that guns, in the hands of law abiding Americans, are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Chinese communists.

4. You have to believe there was no art before Federal funding.

5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical, documented changes in the earth's climate, and more affected by Americans driving SUVs.

6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial, but being homosexual is natural.

7. You have to be against capital punishment but support abortion on demand.

8. You have to believe that business creates oppression and governments create prosperity.

9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but loony activists from Seattle do.

10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.

11. You have to believe that the U.S. Military, not evil and tyrannical regimes, start wars.

12. You have to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports certain parts of the Constitution.

13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.

14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, General Robert E. Lee, or Thomas Edison.

15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.

16. You have to believe Hillary Clinton is all about "progress" and not power. She just wants to help us out of the archaic system of governing that we have been subjected to since our founding.

17. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried, is because the right people haven't been in charge. (I've got news for you. It has never worked because the RIGHT people have been in charge.)

18. You have to believe Republicans telling the truth belong in jail, but a cheat, liar and sex offender belongs in the White House and you would vote him back in there in a New York Minute (if you could).

19. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag, transvestites, and bestiality should be constitutionally protected, and manger scenes at Christmas should be illegal.

20. You have to believe that illegal Democrat Party funding by the Chinese is somehow in the best interest of the United States.

21. You have to believe that the vociferous minorities who protest against prayer and saluting the flag in school have far more rights than the majority who believe in God and country, and want these values instilled in our young children.

22. You have to believe in MOB RULE and not RULING THE MOB (The Republican way).

23. You must not listen to Rush Limbaugh.

24 Trade Unions and Trial Lawyers are our strength and power.

25 The Main Stream Media and Hollywood are our propagandists.

26 WE HAVE TO CUT & RUN FROM IRAQ BECAUSE IF

THE U.S. HELPS THEM WIN - WE LOSE.

27 LAST BUT NOT LEAST WE ARE THE PARTY FOR THE LOSERS IN

LIFE AND WE CAN ONLY KEEP OUR POWER BY KEEPING THEM

THERE.

27 You have to swear to the : THE DEVIL'S CODE

HIS HEART DOES NOT EXIST

HE SPEAKETH WITH A FORKED TONGUE

HIS STRENGTH UPHOLDS THE WICKED

HIS SWORD SLAYS THE DEFENSELESS

HIS WRATH UNDOES THE INNOCENT

'

BUT NOT TO THE: THE KNIGHT'S CODE

HIS HEART KNOWS VIRTUE

HIS TONGUE SPEAKS ONLY TRUTH

HIS STRENGTH UPHOLDS THE WEAK

HIS SWORD DEFENDS THE HELPLESS

HIS WRATH UNDOES THE WICKED

THIS WAS THE OATH OF A FIGHTER PILOT. Keep forwarding and add more

PS-THE COWBOY AND FIGHTER PILOT IS AMERICA’S VERSION OF OLD EUROPE’S CHIVALRY AND KNIGHTHOOD.


—MR. BILL

Posted by: Ms Helga | September 2, 2008 2:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My dear Sally,
Regarding Ms. Palins need to stay home and babysit and bake cookies for her kids: As a single widowed father who raised three very successful children (starting at age 3), I say, balderdash... I certainly had to work a little harder and so did they - but I didn't quit my job to stay home to hold their hands and they didn't quit trying to live their lives well.

It enabled them to become quite self reliant and made the time we did get to spend together that much more fulfilling.

Based on my lifetime experience (and 19 years with my energetic wife), if a man can do it - I figure a woman will do even better since they're tougher in more ways than you might think.

I wouldn't bring up her foreign policy experience since young Mr. Obama has exactly none - and he's the front end of the ticket - one might argue that Mr. Biden's experience has managed to be on the wrong side of history since he turned up decades ago... so much for change. One might also consider that the last 4 presidents had no experience in that area when elected either and we're still doing pretty ok...

Regarding age issues, my parents, both born before McCain's era, are in their 80's and going strong - McCain's mom is in her 90's -

What's your real reason for your comments... it's not Hillary that's the woman in the race?
my best wishes,
Phil
ps. McCain/Hillary would have been an interesting ticket...
pps. might also be a mistake to bring up out-of-wedlock births too... I believe others in the race might be offended.

Posted by: Phil | September 2, 2008 2:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

By so called "progressive" female standards, Barack should have been an abortion since his mother gave birth to him at 18. Think of all the great leaders, inventors, and wonderful people who end up suffocating as infants in linen closets thanks to Roe vs. Wade.
PS - What does "pesidency" mean? Sally, did you know you could set up spell check as an auto feature?

Posted by: Sarah | September 2, 2008 2:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So let me get this straight... you think that when McCain was evaluating VP candidates he took into consideration whether or not the condidate would help him win the election! That is astounding. This is why I read columns like your to get this hard-hitting, insightful commentary.
-Obama 'bin lyin!!! Pick McCain, not Hussein!!!

Posted by: occams gun | September 2, 2008 2:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is amazing that no one mentions her current job as governor. We should look at Obama as qualified because of his time in the legislature (with his definitive "present votes")but some one with actual experience is unqualified. The topping statement is the unimaginable thought that because she is a mother with children she should be a home doing her wifely duty. What would be the outlook if a Republician made the comment about liberal?

Posted by: Dexx | September 2, 2008 2:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Unbelievable. This woman is much closer to me, my wife, and my daughter's values than your opinion. I have been exposed to McCain while at ASU for grad school and have been defending him to friends for months. To the last person, they have called or emailed me saying that they now understand why I have been supporting him. We ARE a "non-traditional" nation with traditional values. Everything in the Palin family so far speaks directly to us. We all have family incidents that should be handled with courage and strength vs. a cold calculated selfish decision. Get on a plane and go figure out why the greater land masses of the US vote this way. It will be a huge eye opener and I would bet you make some very good friends along the way.

WE LOVE THE PALIN FAMILY.

Posted by: Montana man | September 2, 2008 2:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Do you really need to project all your personal failures onto Palin, Sally?

Posted by: Kevin | September 2, 2008 2:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How do the liberals have the nerve to say that Palin isn't qualified to lead the country on day one (which she is only the vp choice) when their candidate has NO experience and they are voting for him to actually take the job on day one. I am so sick of the media and their obvious love of the arrogant Obama. They should really stop complaining about talk radio and Fox News when 90% of the media is pro liberal and anti conservative. The next couple of months will prove if Palin was a good pick but for now you should stop attacking her for being a successful female. We can name some accomplishments of Palin in only two years as a governor, can anyone tell me what Obama has done in three years?

Posted by: Travis | September 2, 2008 2:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is this women nuts ? The same old crap from the liberal left. I wonder how much praise she would have had if the a Clintonist were in the run.

Posted by: high five | September 2, 2008 2:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

what does "pesidency" mean? maybe you should spend some more time on spell check and less time on your liberal anti-female agenda.

Posted by: Sarah | September 2, 2008 2:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The Dems and their mainstream media mouthpiece push through an ineffectual street-radical leftist elitist candidate with extremely limited experience and a despicable voting record that even HE doesn't want to talk about -- they push through this affirmative-action candidate and subsequently throw their own viable woman candidate under the bus, and the pandering, slavish lib mainstream media is fine with all this.

The street-radical inexperienced political hack has close personal and/or political ties to the likes of Ayers, Rezko, and Wright -- not an issue with the lib mainstream media.

The affirmative-action street-radical unqualified candidate topping the ticket picks an entrenched old-boy Washington liberal who was roundly rejected by the voters whenever he sought the White House; an old-boy Washington fixture with a history of plagiarism and some serious eyebrow-raising issues relating to his own family -- not a problem with the libs and the MSM.

McCain picks an intelligent woman with strength of convictions and executive experience, who has a record of taking on the establishment, and the libs and MSM put on a sanctimonious show of pretentious indignation because -- GASP! -- her 17-year old daughter is pregnant.

What a sham. The liberals aren't even trying to hide their own hypocrisy. Not to mention the blatant sexism that goes with their blatant bias.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 2, 2008 2:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What happened to "women can have it all" and "all the proud working single mothers"? At least Palin has a husband to help out. The liberals should be happy that her husband is home and the wife works; a hippies dream.Democrats should be as happy as Bill on interns. Oh that's right I forgot about the baby killing part, well you can't have everything.

Posted by: Ray | September 2, 2008 2:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find it interesting the second term you use to describe Palin is "attractive." Would you say that about a man when describing his qualifications? Hypocrite.

Posted by: Bryant | September 2, 2008 2:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Was the nomination of Barack Obama, an individual with even less experience than Sarah Palin an insult to African Americans?

Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2008 2:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Me thinks, you do protest too much. This and other liberal stories about Sarah, just proves it was the right pick. All the negativism speaks volumes. You are scared of her.
A successful, smart, mother, who can do it all. Isn't that what feminism is about. Oh, the problem is she is conservative and attractive, which flies in the face of feminism.
Christians will not have aproblem with her daughters pregnancy, disappointing, yes, but she is keeping the baby, wonderful. Maybe that's what is bugging liberals, she is keeping the baby.
This pick finally got me excited about McCain. He made a bold and inspiring choice. Who made the better choice for "change"? McCain did, Biden is old same old boys club from Washington, Sarah is as far away as you can get from the incestual pool that is Washington.
Also, this baby will be loved by all, and not be a "punishment" on her children. As far as abstinence, "it works every time it is tried". Nothing wrong with encouraging kids to abstain, some succeed, some fail, but we love them anyway, that's LIFE.

Posted by: cowboy16 | September 2, 2008 2:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You all in the "insider" media just don't get it. But that's really OK. People who think for themselves couldn't care less.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 2:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's ammaizing how you women's Lib types will throw a woman under the bus if she doesn't tow the hard left liberal line. A wise man once told me that there is nothing a lib hates more than a conservative women. (Unless it's a conservative black.) How true those words turn out to be.

Posted by: Michael Cahill | September 2, 2008 2:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, Answer me honestly, would Obama be the nominee if he were not African American? Do you perceive the 95% of African Americans that voted in the primaries, as stupid, or as fools, like you imply women who support a woman candidate?

Posted by: Angela | September 2, 2008 2:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article essentially argues against the women's progressive movement with themes of " you are a mom, you need to stay at home." Funny how fast you will turn an argument around when it serves your political need.

Posted by: hypocrite | September 2, 2008 2:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Does Palin's gender have anything to do with McCain's VP choice? No doubt it does, but so does her record of reform, action, and willingness to confront the Establishment - even within her own party. It's too bad your myopia won't let you see beyond race and gender.

Gee, I would have thought the liberal-leaning would be jumping up and down that a serious presidential contender (i.e., not Mondale) would select a credentialled woman to be his running mate. This should be a cause for celebrating the destruction of stereotypes. But, as the Gipper would say, "There you go again!"

Consider these stereotypes that you - a feminist columnist in a liberal rag - are perpetuating:

"John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman and one who appealed to the Republican's conservative evangelical base. - You are insinuating that her gender was the only reason for her choice! If a conservative male columnist had made the claim, his editors would have his head!

"Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?" - Please tell this to all the female CEO's out there!!

"This is no time to to play gender politics." - Unless you have documented proof that this was the over-riding consideration, then you are just perpetuating the stereotype.

Shame on you!

Posted by: Janis | September 2, 2008 2:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Typical left wing blog on the part of Sally Quinn. She cannot truly believe that Biden was selected for other than political reasons. A strange pick on the part of Obama to select a 35 year member of the Senate who stated that he was not interested in the Vice Presidency and a man who said Obama was not qualified to be President. I would like your comments on this Sally Quinn.


Posted by: ken mack | September 2, 2008 2:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The WaPo thinks ALL It's Readers 'Customers' are Wrong and they are sticking with that delusion all the way to the ash heap of history!

Why it couldn't be that Sicko Sally is dead wrong she just needs to get her message out better.

So, screech your insanity from the mountain tops!

Posted by: Don't Worry | September 2, 2008 2:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You didnt make it on national TV because of your ridiculas leftwing views on the world.

Posted by: will | September 2, 2008 2:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm sorry Ms Quinn, but on this point you're wrong. In your world of glitz and glamour, you probably see your(example only)children when the Nanny goes home. Their every notion of life experience is not relayed to you directly, as if you were a stay at home mom. The criticisms in your article had me racking my brain why, until I saw the light. Going back to childhood days in Kentucky, back in the hither country. Back to the trips to Montana; where I was born. To Illinois, where my brother lived at the time. Looking at the corn fields; that ran for miles across the country side. To the people at the night club where our band played in West Virginia.They helped us break down, fed us; still, the best breakfast I've ever had. To finish; you and your ilk, just don't like us. The ones that keep the country running. The ones that go to battle to keep free speech and liberty from falling off the face of the earth. Caviar, and fine wine, is great. BMW's and "Benz's are good cars. I hope you enjoy your life. But please; understand: we understand. We'll take a Palin and McCain; anyday. Keep your DC politics, and your friends to yourselves. We, the real people of this great country, don't even know who a Sally Quinn, or a David Broder, or a Robert Novak is. But we know what's right. And you, are wrong. Fly over country USA won't miss DC at all. God Bless the good people of the USA. And bless all you wonderful mothers, girlfriends, sisters, and wives that vote for their country, not their club.

Posted by: Fx Mulder | September 2, 2008 2:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

@ Proud Uncle

You say

"This is a blattant attempt by liberal journalist to torpedo a very strong selection for VP by holding conservatives to a much higher standard than themselves."

No... she's holding conservatives to the standard they pretend to hold themselves to. Conservatives are the ones that look down on those who have children out of wed-lock, yet spit out more unprepared for kids than anyone else.

These standards are YOURS... and YOUR vice-president can't even abide by them.

Posted by: Matt | September 2, 2008 2:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why don't you watch and listen to the woman the next few weeks before making such judgements. After all, you don't have to vote tomorrow.

As for her lack of foreign policy experience... may I point to Barack Obama. His experience is nill. Sure, he has Biden to help him out, however, in the same light, Palin will have a mentor in McCain. Furthermore, Palin is running for VP and Obama for president. So the more pressing issue is Obama's experience. I would gamble that McCain will not drop dead after his inaugural speech.

If McCain's selection seems political, well, I am sure it has a lot to do with it. Can you tell me that Obama has not made decisions for political advantage? He selected Biden for political advantage! Personally, I think Palin is a better choice for McCain's VP than Biden is for Obama's.

Palin holds a lot of values that are important to the conservative base. She also has more executive experience that the three other principles in the race. Also, those who want "change" should welcome a woman in the White House. Why Obama did not select Hillary is beyond me!?!? I think it would have made for a strong team.

Oh, as for the issue of her daughter's pregnancy, polls show that it had no effect with Evangelicals. In fact, as one Evangelical article reported yesterday, he repeated what many Christians have said, "Christians aren't perfect, just saved".

Come on, give her more time. Voting is not until Nov. Let's see what she and McCain put out there before starting any petty Palin bashing.

Posted by: Boomer - Right Wing Squadron | September 2, 2008 2:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You didnt make it on national TV because of your ridiculas leftwing views on the world.

Posted by: will | September 2, 2008 2:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I love the fact that you compare yourself and your TV experience and your parenting experience with those of the VP canidate. Writing for a living and moving up to CBS is VERY similar to being a mayor and govenor. I am glad you drew those comparisons for me. thanks I look forward to not ever reading your work again. thanks again for saving me time

Posted by: drew | September 2, 2008 2:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article treats conservatives as sketches. Obviously Ms. Quinn has does not know any Christians or Conservatives, or has not seriously engaged in a conversation.

When Obama said he wouldn't want his daughter "stuck with a baby" we know what his councel would have been in this situation.

That fact that Governor Palin walks to the walk (counseling her daughter to keep to the baby, keeping her own special needs child).

Liberals who espouse the merits of public schools NEVER send their children to them. Ask Obama:
"My kids have gone to the University of Chicago Lab School, a private school"

Even poor Barack himself attended private school in Hawaii.

As for comdemning her daughter, this article shows how little you know and the low opinion you have of the 51% of your fellow citizens from to 2004 election. I for my part, would not condemn someone for making a bad choice. We are all sinners. I applaud her for making the choice not to make a graver sin by commiting murder.

I will pray for you Ms. Quinn. That you lose the anger you feel in your heart, and that you can show understanding for your fellow citizens who value the sanctity of life.

Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2008 2:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

What typical liberal, hypocritical, uneducated, thoughtless drivel you spout. You need to get a real job where your foolishness is not apparent for everyone to see. She has more executive experience (hint, that is what is needed in the office of the president, not senate blow hard politicians. educate yourself) than Obama, Biden and even McCain put together. Obama has no experience because he hasn't DONE ANYTHING. Name me ONE thing he HAS done that you think qualifies him to be president. And Biden? Come one. He has been WRONG on foreign policy more than he has been right. What good is experience if you are always wrong?

I feel sorry for you. You are so blind to your hypocrisy that you actually think you are somehow spouting intelligent though.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 1:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow. Sally needs to get out more and meet a few of those Evangelicals. Sarah's daughter being pregnant is not the issue; how the daughter, and the family, handle the pregnancy is the issue.

We freakish "family values" voters would be turned off from the Palin family if we found out that the daughter had had an abortion at the parents' request or raised her baby as a single parent relying on the state to fill her needs.

Did Sally mention a few months ago that the stakes were too high for gender politics when Hilarie was still in the race? What had Hilarie EVER done that qualified her to be president? Running for the Senate?

I value Sarah Palin's local responsiblities in a small town (it's a lot tougher to govern and make decisions when you're living next door to the people's whose lives you are effecting)and her experience as governor a lot more than Hilarie Clinton and B Obama's political careers.

Posted by: Anne | September 2, 2008 1:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Japan, Dearest Japan,
and Vatican

i dont practise Reiki, once upon a time, i was in Olimpos Antalya, and JApaneses didnt know it. later i learned that it is Egyptian Catholic Anatolian Colorado practise.

i know Reiki, i know what flows amongst people. and i have learned catholics and jupiter too after Reiki. so in your practises, Japan, Dearest JApan, you may consider multidimensional attitudes other than ultraviolet practises.

Posted by: sthumblewidecircle | September 2, 2008 1:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally needs to drive her SUV beemer or Volvo to the next irrelevant Georgetown cocktail party.
She is so classically elitist and naive that only that environment is suitable to her rediculous dribble.
What world does the Washington Post occupy?

Posted by: Rush | September 2, 2008 1:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Senator McCain put politics not the country first by picking Governor Palin. The pick is an attempt to gain angry women voters and shore up the base; not because he wanted to honor a woman.

The governor has a compelling story but this move is a transparent attempt to use her to gain votes and not because of her qualifications. What about Senators Bailey-Hutchinson and Olympia Snow?

This also shows how Senator McCain can run with his gut and do we really want a leader who relies on his gut more than reasoned deliberation and logic? I think not.

Respectfully,
Robert V. Simpson

Posted by: Robert V. Simpson | September 2, 2008 1:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally it wasn't cyical, it was genius. If the daughter had or was going to have an abortion you would have loved it. If the Downs Syndrom child was aborted, you would have loved it.

Sally, you and the rest of the far out lefties just can't take it. You (the collective you) just can't risk having a Republican Pro-life woman become a role model for American women. You will continue to try and destroy (to no avail) Sarah Palin just like the attempted destruction and derailment of Clarence Thomas. If thats not enough her daughter will be red meat for you and your lefties.

Lefty women activists are not activists for all women at all; only those who believe in their far far left liberal views. Democrat women in the news media (excuse me, I mean't to say those registered independents) can only survive in a world where women have premarital sex and then abortion. No religion! No guns! Nobody is responsible for what they do! Only liberal democrat government can do for the people; the people can't do for themselves. It makes me sick hearing about what you people think, say and write. I think I'll go take an antacid now.

Posted by: Richard Beltram | September 2, 2008 1:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find you people so stupid. You have no problem with your man who has no experence, but man you have a huge problem Palin's lack of experence. Never mind that your man is running for the #1 spot. I know that the she is lacking. After all she hasen't even had an abortion, she believes in God, she believes in gun rights. You can't have have person like that in this country running for office. If she wanted to be a Democrate she could at least wait and have partical birth abortion, and become an athiest.
I can't find the words vile enough to express my disgust to you and your kind.

Posted by: bill schroyer | September 2, 2008 1:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Call me a cynic, but I have to agree with your assesment of Senator McCain's choice for a VP running mate. If the goal was to sway the disenfranchised Democratic female voters to his side then he most certainly could have picked someone will a little more experience and a lot less baggage.

I applaud Governor Palin for all that she has managed to accomplished in the few years she's been on this earth. And I certainly don't want to seem sexist in saying that instead of politics she should be tending to her children. However, unless her spouse decides to be a stay-at-home dad, I cannot see how their children will be served by having a mother on Air Force Two traipsing around the world or if Heaven forbid, she has to become the President of the US and all of what that entails.

I feel the same way about Obama's family. Just because he is a man doesn't negate the fact that he is the parent of young children.

The difference between the two is the number of children and the fact that a special needs child and soon a grandchild will need the attention of very involved parents.

As much as a feminist I may deign myself to be, I have to wholeheartedly agree with Sally Quinn, "A mother's role is different from a father's."

Plus, I HATE TO BE PANDERED TO!!!!!! SHAME ON YOU SENATOR MCCAIN!

Posted by: E. Y. Figueroa | September 2, 2008 1:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Frankly, I find this article shocking and it angers me. Obama has little experience, as well, and in fact, I cannot even figure out how he landed with a sonic boom on the political scene so quickly. It is unexplainable. And, how can supposed journalists continue to dismiss his inexperience and, furthermore, his ties to Wright, Phleger, Ayers (just to name a few), who Obama has clearly had close relationships with and continues to associate with? He associates, denies, disassociates, denies, and disassociates time and time again. I find this more troubling than anything you could ever come up with on Palin. Whatever it is that your group claims to be, you certainly don't come off as being a group whose religious conversation is anything other than left-leaning and clearly proponants of Obama. Obama, himself, has chosen an "older" VP running mate, clearly also for political reasons. What an absurd statement....IT'S POLITICS! That's why they choose certain people for VP's; to gain some additional political traction. Your article is judgmental, slanted, and patently biased.

Posted by: Linda S. | September 2, 2008 1:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The author of this article is the reason I walked away from religion and its hateful perversion of what I read and understood of Christian love and forgiveness some 44 years ago. Now I tread a more deist road. I found this article to be hateful and the reason so many dislike so vehemently the mega-millionaires who preach to the masses today. Some Sarah is awful, while Hillary only brought being First Lady to the table. As First Lady she was specifically excluded from all substantive discussions and activities. He previous experience was in shady real estate dealing in Arkansas. These prissy judgmental folks who are throwing the first, second, and third stones ought to remember their Faith should be more than excoriating those they feel are sinful.

Posted by: George H | September 2, 2008 1:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

These democrate party Socialist/progressive regressives are running scared. This is a good signal we are receiving from them. Oh, let me use one of the regressive's favourite line, "lets discuss the issues".

Finally they are being honest and confirming about who they are. We already know Obama's bakground, hint...read his book. He was smoking weed and was proud of it. Great moral example from the democrate part.

Sally quin and others love to carry the water for the democrate party.

Posted by: jorge | September 2, 2008 1:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally: How could you be so hopelessly out of touch? Why did you accept the job titled "On Faith" knowing so little about people of faith? My advice: Get out of your Beltway/Liberal cocoon and talk to some real people! Real people are loving Sarah Palin because she is a movement conservative and is highly accomplished. I'm amazed you haven't learned that.

Posted by: Jim R | September 2, 2008 1:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Are you serious? Your concern for Palin's family is a little transparent and desperate. She is not a Democrat so she deserves no support of other "enlighted" woman I guess?

You guys know this was a masters stroke by McCain. Your fear is absolutely delicious. See you on November 4th.


Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 1:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm sorry... this is just too much for me...

A woman that claims to be ultra-conservative, but has a knocked-up 17 year old daughter?

Everyone says this is 'off-limits'. Well, I don't buy that!!!

This is an issue that conservatives beat like a dead horse.

Plain and simple... hypocrisy and stupidity.

Palin and family are just your typical white, trailer-trash rednecks... just this time, they're from Alaska... not Texas.

How dare she preach about 'family values' and 'anti-abortion' when she hasn't even taught her own children safe-sex (or abstinence) practices.

We the American people have every right to judge this woman on this issue alone... conservatives do it on a daily basis.

The hypocrisy is staggering.

Posted by: Matt | September 2, 2008 1:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Didn't Sarah Palin say in her statement to the TV press that she is "proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents."

When I heard the statement the first thought that came to my mind is I thought she was anti-abortion and if so, why is she using the women's right to choose language?

Did her daughter consider an abortion and then chose to keep it?

Therefore, what is her stance on conservative views, is she right to life, or right to choose?

Posted by: Jean | September 2, 2008 1:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Of course, this can happen in any family. But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother."

My mother was as dedicated a Baptist church member and "hands-on" mother that I know. Yet her only daughter of 5 children got pregnant in high school, and like Bristol Palin plans to do, got married and raised a beautiful daughter of her own.

This is a blattant attempt by liberal journalist to torpedo a very strong selection for VP by holding conservatives to a much higher standard than themselves.

Posted by: Proud Uncle | September 2, 2008 1:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are what I find insulting to women.

Posted by: LCR | September 2, 2008 1:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

your viewpoint is disgusting....you have a double standard but that is normal for a beltway liberal!!!!

Posted by: cute in mi | September 2, 2008 1:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

From reading this I can't help but think that McCain isn't the cynical one

Posted by: Frank | September 2, 2008 1:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is it always going to be a pander when a woman or ethnic minority gets chosen for a spot on a national ticket? If you were following conservative opinion, she was chosen because she was one of the few who had (limited) executive experience, was a reformer, and had the conservative credentials that McCain needed for the base. Republicans are grown up enough to recognize the pregnancy situation is going to be tough on the family but they are rallying and the father is doing the right thing by stepping up to his responsibility. How is that not "family values". Get off your high horse and realize that Palin was for the base, not women or democrats.

Posted by: Don Nelson | September 2, 2008 1:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obviously what you complain about is something you would ever do. That's why you are not a Vice President candidate. You are all too human, too risk adverse, too self serving. So thanks for letting us know all about you by projecting your lameness onto Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Robert | September 2, 2008 1:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Seems strange that I can read 2 articles, written by 2 women, in 2 cities, and they almost read exactly the same! Sally Quinn, Washington Post, writes. "Palin's lack of experience and her family situation are both valid and vital considerations here, especially when she will be running with a 72-year-old presidential candidate who has suffered four bouts of a deadly cancer." Susan Reimer, Baltimore Sun writes. "McCain is 72. He has had at least four go-rounds with melanoma, a deadly cancer."

One would think this was coordinated by a higher authority!

Posted by: J Mosher | September 2, 2008 1:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I wonder how Ms. Quinn would have advised Obama's 18 year old mother when she was pregnant?

Posted by: Ventoso | September 2, 2008 1:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You're an idiot...

Governor Palin's daughter has nothing to do with her run for VP. In fact most pro-life Christians will sympathize with her and her family during this time. Most know someone or have been in this situation themselves. She has handled it all with courage, dignity and class which is more that you have done. You should really be ashamed.

Posted by: Middle class mother of 3 | September 2, 2008 1:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is an anti-establishment candidate. McCains and her candidacy are a repudiation of business as usual in Washington. She dumped the crooks in Alaska and she will help do the same in Washington. Although she is an environmentalist she is aware of the down right stupidity of Congress's bans on drilling. She is the right woman at the right time.

Posted by: Ron | September 2, 2008 1:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess liberals believe in women as long as they are liberal women who agree with them.. Maybe they should change NOW to NOOLW.. The National Organization of Liberal Women.. No conservatives allowed!.... Because it is very clear now that the supposedly tolerant NOW, will only tolerate women who agree with them!

Posted by: lfs | September 2, 2008 1:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I suppose that picking Joe Biden is just as cynical as John McCains pick. The thought of him picking an old white Irish "Catholic" Man from Pennsylvania just "to win an election". Fisrt Joe is as Catholic as Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, and Pelosie(useing the catholic brand to influence votes and not following the teachings of "Thier" church, which is offensive to me. Second Obama wants to be the savior of change so he picks a washington monolith which means no-change, as third His original pick of Paris Hilton would have sent Hillary supporters into such a PMS jealousy attack the civil war would have less blood shed and Katrina look like a spring shower.
Every VP pick is to win the election and would be stupid to pick someone not to win the election.
Unless you have interviewed John McCain at to his reasons don't assume he did it for your reasons.

Posted by: Jen | September 2, 2008 1:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am SO offended by this article!! "..a hard one to swallow...", I don't think so. What it shows me and most people I've talked to is that this family is even CLOSER to us everday Americans than ANY other political family I know of. Palin's lack of experience? She has MORE experience then Obama has, and that isn't just my opinion, its a fact...and Obama is running for President, not just the Vice-President!! There is no comparison. I think Sally Quinn needs to jump off of her Obama Horse and consider what Americans have been craving for a LONG time, and that is to have someone in that Great White House of Ours that is like you-and-me, and Palin is one who can satisfy that craving. I was actually proud of the fact that Obama was the gentleman he was to handle Palins pregnant daughter with dignity and respect. You liberals should learn a lesson from him.

Posted by: G Wade | September 2, 2008 1:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In regarding your article on Governor Palin…it would seem less to do with a conversation on "religion", than about your personal opinion of dissatisfaction.

It looks as though Gov. Palin is/has already been working outside the home in a public office for some time and has successfully balanced a demanding work and family life.

I would argue over your assertion that because Gov. Palin’s teen-age daughter is pregnant, that she is not a good or attentive parent. Does that mean President and Mrs. Bush are responsible for their daughter’s former partying ways or that Former President Carter and his wife were responsible for their daughter’s problems in her young life? There are many full time attentive and home-schooling parents at home (moms AND dads) whose children STILL have less than desirable issues spring up…that’s life – it isn’t perfect. I believe there were quite a few young children in Washington who came out of the experience just fine…if their parent’s could accomplish that, why can’t Gov. Palin? And, how is the decision for the young parents to marry and raise the child become “difficult” for the Republican conservative family-values crowd to swallow? Isn’t this more of what they’d prefer instead of another young single parent filing for child support? These young people are taking responsibility, which is frequently less and less common. In reading through your article, you seem to be very knowledgeable on what skills & abilities people do or don’t have…what would your suggestion for this young couple be?

A thought; isn’t Gov. Palin a MRS. Palin? The children apparently have had a very involved Father in their lives and it would seem logical that he would continue to an involved parent and husband should they move to Washington. Apparently…their “roles” work just fine for their family. Good for Dad!

Drawing comparisons for what you weren’t ready for and what the GOP VP nominee isn’t ready for…isn’t your argument to make. It would seem as the qualifications for your individual employment positions…aren’t really comparable. Nor is it appropriate for you to suggest what she is or isn’t ready for, or question the Governor’s abilities in and how she chooses to raise her children …do you know her personally or her character? If not, then it would be more admirable for you to keep your journalistic “credibility” by commenting on the things you DO know or are verifiable, and not continually attempt to make weak parallel references to yourself…unless you plan to run for office as well.

Shandra L. Smith
Appleton, WI

Posted by: ssmith | September 2, 2008 1:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

One correction to an otherwise interesting and often insightful commentary: a pregnant 17-year-old who is marrying the baby's father and having the child is not likely to be an issue with most religiously conservative Christian voters. Most will view this as a seventeen-year-old who made a mistake and strayed from the values she was taught growing up, but who refused to take the easy out of abortion and is instead facing up to the responsibility of parenthood. To the extent that this impacts anyone's views on Sarah Palin, the impact among conservative voters is likely to be a net positive.

In my opinion, that in no way negates the rest of Sally's concerns. I agree that Palin, while an attractive person on a personal level, is not someone I would wish to see landed with all the weight of the presidency if John McCain should become incapacitated or die in office. She's inexperienced. She has no foreign policy background. She's an outsider in Washington who lacks the connections and support that a president needs to deal with international problems.

However, as a friend of mine says, the choice isn't between that candidate and the Almighty, but that candidate and the alternative. Barack Obama is also inexperienced (about equally so, in my opinion), and unlike Palin is the presidential candidate. So for those of us who think this country desperately needs a president who isn't learning too much of the job while on the job, Obama's lack of experience is likely to be the bigger issue of the two.

Posted by: Catherine Jefferson | September 2, 2008 1:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You've Got To Be Joking! Sara is everything you wish a Democrate Woman should be (but can't be)! If she was on your team, you would change every single thing you wrote!

Posted by: Norm | September 2, 2008 1:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn,
I'm amazed and appalled at your shortsightedness about Gov. Palin on so many fronts, but your arrogance betrays your apparent true motives. To imply that being an Anchorwoman is akin to being the VEEP is ridiculous and laughable. That comparison alone prevents me from addressing each of your assumptions...
Perhaps a bit more thought would be better before you write such unmistakeablly biased pieces.
Sincerely,
Jeff McLeod
Flower Mound, TX

Posted by: Jeff McLeod | September 2, 2008 1:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Idiotic article. Palin's DAUGHTER is pregnant - not HER!!!

And her daughter is having the child and getting married. I admire them both.

Men just don't get it.

Posted by: Mia | September 2, 2008 1:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a born again, evangelical christian that believes whole heartedly in the unconditional love and forgiveness of Jesus. To sit there and write an article which passes extreme judgement on a woman that you do not know, is undeniably un-christian and un-loving. Go back to the books of Matthew and take a hint from the acts of Jesus- then you might understand how to respond in a situation like this. Your article is also undeniably anti-woman's rights. If a man was running for vice president and had 5 children, as well as a special needs baby, I am sure you would not be bringing up the same point about Sarah Palin. If I were you, I would repent and ask for Mercy for passing such judgement on a woman and her 17 year old daughter who now faces a trying time in her life. What happened to Compassion? Maybe you missed all one of the most important messages Jesus delivered to his people- love one another. I would rather have Sarah Palin running this country any day than Joe Biden. She is a woman of honesty- clearly we have seen this, and a woman of pure strength. Your path in life and failing on Network television, does not support your position. You failed, but clearly Sarah Palin is a woman of more strength.

Posted by: Jessica Diehl | September 2, 2008 1:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Idiotic article. Palin's DAUGHTER is pregnant - not HER!!!

And her daughter is having the child and getting married. I admire them both.

Men just don't get it.

Posted by: Mia | September 2, 2008 1:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, so many issues in this article, I'm going to have to pick just a few to challenge. You cannot be serious with the "she should stay at home to care for her kids" line. She addressed that saying that her husband will be quitting his job and will be a "stay at home dad". Much more went into this selection than pandering to the HIliary voters. She looks like and lives like most of the Republicans that I know; no Ivy league education, no law degree, not born into a politcal family. As a lifelong Republican, I'm tired of the same resume and we see where those types of resumes have gotten us. As for experience, she has run in and won contested races, unlike Obama who got all of his challengers kicked off the ballot for his state seat and as for his Senate seat, his competitors each dropped out due to Sex Scandels. As far a foreign policy, one trip to the mideast and a tour through Europe does not make someone "experienced" in foreign policy. She is as qualified if not moreso than Obama.

Posted by: dawn | September 2, 2008 1:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What's in your closet that you are hiding?

Posted by: LCR | September 2, 2008 1:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I thought this article was supposed to be about Sarah Palin, not Sally Quinn. Get over yourself Sally--comparing Sarah Palin to yourself is the real insult. Seems that so far Sarah Palin's only real "failing" is that she is a real person with (gasp!) real family issues and not a liberal phony like you.

Posted by: Emmy | September 2, 2008 1:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Has anyone checked if Palin has any ties to extremist Eskimos? I have heard a rumor that she has ties to Inuit fundamentalists that are looking to spread their pro-snow, pro-moccasin, pro-Omega3 ideals on hard-working middle class Americans.

I have seen a picture on the net with Palin snow-shoeing rather than holding her hand to her heart during the pledge. This is alarming people!!!

I am afraid she will make this country be like Canada.

Posted by: Britt Hume | September 2, 2008 1:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You don't get conservatives or even independent voters - obviously. If Gov Palin were a liberal, you article would have had a much different tone and been full of nothing but praise. Your attacks on Gov Palin are as biased as they are transparent. Why should her 17 year old daughter who happened to end up pregnant be made to feel guilty and be the reason why Gov Palin should not accept the nomination? Would you demand that of a liberal woman?? Liberals like you claim to be the champions of womens rights but only if they are liberal women.

Another thing you don't get is religious conservative voters. Christian conservatives have many mothers who work outside of the home - some out of necessity and some out of desire. (Necessity because taxes are so high that it takes two incomes in one family to make ends meet - would you advocate lowering taxes so some mothers who have to work might have the choice of staying home????) I didn't think so. Michelle Obama has young children and works outside the home - would you demand that she decline her work role to make her children her first priority? I think we all know the answer to that question is a resounding no! Just because some Christian women work doesn't mean they have to say no to family values.

You say that this is no time to play gender politics, however that is exactly what you are doing.

Posted by: Rhonda Wilson | September 2, 2008 1:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Governor Palin was selected solely because she was a woman? The pick was "cynical"?

Absurd.

I imagine Sally would think differently if Governor Palin was a liberal. Then, the pick would be considered "courageous," right?

Unfortunately for Democrats, Governor Palin happens to be a strong woman who has her own opinions - and doesn't follow the liberal feminist talking points.

Governor Palin has proven herself to be a tough competitor, with experience rivaling the top of the Democratic ticket (that's being kind to Obama, who hasn't run anything but his mouth). Palin also didn't make her bones on the back of Monica Lewinsky. She actually took on the Old Boys' Network - and won.

Seems to me that Sally and all her left-wing "inside the beltway cocktail circuit" friends are a little scared of the Governor of Alaska.

Posted by: Tom | September 2, 2008 1:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yet another liberal talking head preaching to her faithful cool-aid drinkers. Would your diatribe be nearly as condescending and hostile if she was a pro-death liberal business woman who had no family? My thought is no, but since this is yet another liberal, bash the conservatives columnist, I guess I should not be surprised. Oh and BTW, why don't you mention how "cynical" Obama's choice for VP is?
Let's see, "Change = 35 year sitting Democratic Senator with the third most liberal voting record of 100 senators?" NOT
Let's see, "Change = Blue Collar Catholic with some foreign policy experience?" NOT
Let's see, "Change = Leading Democratic candidate who would not support Obama until he is chosen to be VP?" NOT
WOW - Check your liberal agenda at the door and start being at least unbiased in your opinions - you owe your readers that!

Posted by: Unreal | September 2, 2008 1:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

For what the Liberal press and Blogs have in store for her in the future and do to the fact that Jack Bauer is missing in action we will have to call her, Sarah "Collin" Palin.

Posted by: David George | September 2, 2008 1:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yet another Washington Post leftist is unhappy with a republican. What a shock.

Posted by: tbilll | September 2, 2008 1:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are the reason America has problems. Join Pelosi on the idiot, face lift crowd, except your doesn't look so hot and Pelosi looks like a blinking fool.

Posted by: Dale | September 2, 2008 1:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn- you are the reason people use the exclamation "dumb broad."

No "values" voters are going to reject Palin because of her daughter. The judgmental ones might question her parenting abilities and career priorities. THE JUDGMENTAL ONES... sort of like you! However, ultimately values voters will recognize that her positions, however 'poorly executed' they may have been in her family, are compatible with the upbringing they want for their children.

Let's not forget, either, that Obama has no executive experience and a very short record... oh yeah, and he wants to be the big cheese, not #2.

Posted by: Laura | September 2, 2008 1:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So women are supposed to be God-less and pro-abortion.

Isn't that the definition of Pro-Life: taking responsibility for one's actions and giving support after the birth?

Posted by: K Shannon | September 2, 2008 1:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How come all these liberals are claiming McCain picked Sarah Palin because she is a woman? Could it be that she compliments his ticket? Liberal women are only perpetuating a mindset that women will continue to only be seen as women and nothing more.

Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008 1:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is an anti-establishment candidate. McCains and her candidacy are a repudiation of business as usual in Washington. She dumped the crooks in Alaska and she will help do the same in Washington. Although she is an environmentalist she is aware of the down right stupidity of Congress's bans on drilling. She is the right woman at the right time.

Posted by: Ron | September 2, 2008 1:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article is disgusting. I have no idea who Sally Quinn is, as I was unfamiliar with her work prior to this article; but this column is as biased and unlevel as any ever written. I'm surprised the Washington Post tolerates this sort of thing. Lastly, I find it extremely insulting to women that Quinn considers Palin's "family situation" a "distraction" to the role of VP. One wonders if Quinn would consider the same circumstance a "distraction" if the candidate were a male and a father of the pregnant teen. Methinks not.

Posted by: Kevin kelly | September 2, 2008 1:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is the Republican platform in the midst of a major change? Is the obvious sin of sex before marriage dropping off the radar screen? If so, WHY? McCain's calculated choice of a running mate who's own child violated this sacred commandment may be a clear sign that the Republican party plans to drop some of their fundamentalist viewpoints in favor of focusing on other issues. I guess we'll have to see how things pan out.

Posted by: Immoral Pregnancy | September 2, 2008 1:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow... So much to rip apart here, I am not sure where to begin. Maybe I will just pick a couple. Sally Quinn you are a hack!

I'll start here...your comment ..."But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother." Hands on??? Should she be there by her 17 year old daughters side every moment of the day? Give me break. You say you are a mother? Are you with your child every moment to keep him out of trouble? Look around you Sally...there are tons of working moms who do the best they can to care for their kids. Even GOOD kids get in trouble. Can you really be this shallow? And this is a different century where you have stay-at-home dads and even nannies. So I ask you, are you telling all these moms who work that they are bad parents because they are working and not at home? Jeez, you are a naive, hypocritical ass Sally.

Next, how dare you throw in scripture to FIT your agenda. You are clueless as to how she and her husband manage their home. You make me sick Sally! This is not even worth my time to discuss.

And your question "And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?" Are you for real Sally? That is a Democrat talking point that will blow up in their face. Of course she has more experience than Obama the Messiah! She was in an executive position for many years between being a mayor of a town and govenor of a state. Do not discount that as your fellow dems are. It is disgraceful and an insult to the intelligence of Americans. What did Obama do... He was in the Senate with maybe 145 actual work days. He was part of a group of legislators who have NO EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE and make no singular decision that would affect a whole city or state of citizens and industries such as a governor makes DAILY! Obama voted 'Present' on virtually all important and tough votes in the Senate. He is not ready to be president...he cannot even take a stance and make a vote for one tough topic. He is a joke that the mainstream media has turned into a false god and you have fallen for it. And really, look at the people he surrounds himself with. A bunch of radical nuts and spent 20 YEARS with Jeremiah Wright in his BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY church. That is MARXISM. Do you understand this? That is bad news for America. We do not need a socialist country. Good God, what is wrong with you people?

You said Barbara Bush once told me that her husband had been a congressman, UN ambassador, ambassador to China, and head of the CIA and they thought they were prepared for the vice presidency (under President Reagan). But she said nothing can prepare you for the criticism and scrutiny of being in the White House. Sarah Palin is not prepared for that. OK Sally, do you know Sarah Palin? Have you worked with her? Seen her in action? How do you know she is not prepared to deal with scrutiny or even the presidency if needed? If George Bush Sr was not ready, then nobody is ready and it will be a learned job, so your point is mute and pointless. You all judge Sarah Palin but you know nothing about her and you all even admit it!!!!!!! You are all a bunch of circle jerk, hypocritcal morons. Get over yourselves adn stop judging others you do not even know.

The main stream media, you included, make this country worse off by your partisan nonsense and basically mean spirited attacks on good people. No wonder we cannot get a good number of good people to run for office. Who would want to deal with the way you go after them and their families.

Enough of this.... you make me sick. Puke!

Posted by: Ralph | September 2, 2008 1:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Will Palin now leave our gay brothers and sisters alone so they can marry? Will she allow that to be a private act? Of course not, she has the right to get into his bedroom, but we cannot speak about her daughter? She has the right to tell us that women who have been raped or the victims of incest have to bear the child, but we're supposed to give her and her family privacy?

Her privacy rights ended the day she said the oath of office in any public job.

This isn't about feminism. This is about fundy pandering by McCain, demonstrating he cannot stand up to the far right of his party, let alone follow Bin Laden to the gates of hell.

Posted by: Becky | September 2, 2008 1:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a born again, evangelical christian that believes whole heartedly in the unconditional love and forgiveness of Jesus. To sit there and write an article which passes extreme judgement on a woman that you do not know, is undeniably un-christian and un-loving. Go back to the books of Matthew and take a hint from the acts of Jesus- then you might understand how to respond in a situation like this. Your article is also undeniably anti-woman's rights. If a man was running for vice president and had 5 children, as well as a special needs baby, I am sure you would not be bringing up the same point about Sarah Palin. If I were you, I would repent and ask for Mercy for passing such judgement on a woman and her 17 year old daughter who now faces a trying time in her life. What happened to Compassion? Maybe you missed all one of the most important messages Jesus delivered to his people- love one another. I would rather have Sarah Palin running this country any day than Joe Biden. She is a woman of honesty- clearly we have seen this, and a woman of pure strength. Your path in life and failing on Network television, does not support your position. You failed, but clearly Sarah Palin is a woman of more strength.

Posted by: Jessica Diehl | September 2, 2008 1:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally says, "Palin isn't ready to be leader of the free world". Barak Obama, IS??? Ignorant remark here. Sally, please check your facts. Palin isn't running to be leader of the free world. Barak is, i.e. he won't be a "heartbeat away" (as the talking points suggest). He'll BE "first term senator/community organiser leader of the free world"! You claim "John McCain says Barak is inexperienced and unqualified". Is this sneaky or another ignorant comment? Is it that McCain says so, or is he just stating facts? C'mon Sally. Your readers are more intelligent than this and I believe you are as well. Pick up your game and show some professionalism over your feelings.

Posted by: Gary Takvorian | September 2, 2008 1:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Who are you to sit in judgement of another on their morals and their personal family matters? How very "Christian" of you.

Posted by: LCR | September 2, 2008 1:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Does this article sound "cynical and calculated" to anyone else?

The audience for this article isnt consevative evangelicals, its women voters who may seriously decide to cast their vote for McCain.

This is what we call "damage control".

Posted by: Allen | September 2, 2008 1:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

it’s interesting to see what Republican’s conservative evangelical has to say. I can’t help but to think if this was Obama oldest child what would be said. Being a evengelical myself I think back to 1 Tim 3rd chapter 1-7. It’s interesting to know how my fellow brothers & sisters, feel and think. We are taught not to judge for by the same judgement we will also be judge. Life is to short and I respect the childs decision to keep the child; but i feel Palin should step down and allow the Republican Party a chance.

As the book of 1 Timothy 3 Chapter says. How can one rule the house of God if they can not rule their own. Therefore, I am not judging Parlin this is just the word of GOD.

Posted by: Secert | September 2, 2008 1:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Interesting how the same stooges like Sally Quinn who insisted that Wright,Pfleger,Rezko and Ayers are immaterial and "distractions" from the important work of electing Obama are no fascinated with Bristol Palin's pregnancy.The whole lot are as phony as their candidate

Posted by: Cheryl in Fla | September 2, 2008 1:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"A mother's role is different from a father's." says Sally....my, my, my, how the worm turns when the Establishment feels the heat!

Posted by: william | September 2, 2008 1:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why is nobody mentioning that Barack Obama is not even raising his own kids. During this campaign, while he and Michelle are on the road, they are being raised by their grandparents. THAT's responsible parenting? No, that's a double-standard.

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008 1:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is an anti-establishment candidate. McCains and her candidacy are a repudiation of business as usual in Washington. She dumped the crooks in Alaska and she will help do the same in Washington. Although she is an environmentalist she is aware of the down right stupidity of Congress's bans on drilling. She is the right woman at the right time.

Posted by: Ron | September 2, 2008 1:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

When will Gov. Palin resolve the inconsistency in her beliefs that abstinence is a requirement before marriage, when in fact she raised her daughters to not practice abstinence? If my calculations are correct, her daughter that is pregnant at 17 must have had intercourse at age 16. It is valid to assume her sexual activity started even earlier. This obvious sin against God, one of the most damaging to families, let alone the child, was apparently encouraged in the Palin family. This is an extremely important inconsistency in public vs. private belief systems that Gov. Palin must reconcile.

Posted by: Immoral Pregnancy | September 2, 2008 1:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It’s interesting to see what Republican’s conservative evangelical has to say. I can’t help but to think if this was Obama oldest child what would be said. Being a evengelical myself I think back to 1 Tim 3rd chapter 1-7. It’s interesting to know how my fellow brothers & sisters, feel and think. We are taught not to judge for by the same judgement we will also be judge. Life is to short and I respect the childs decision to keep the child; but i feel Palin should step down and allow the Republican Party a chance.

As the book of 1 Timothy 3 Chapter says. How can one rule the house of God if they can not rule their own. Therefore, I am not judging Parlin this is just the word of GOD.

Posted by: Secret | September 2, 2008 1:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well, Sally, it's been years since I have read any of your articles and now I see why.

You are so deep in the Democrats pocket you don't get much light.

Most everything you wrote is so WRONG, I am surprised you still have a job. I guess you're doing "favors" for someone at the Washington Post.

Your column isn't worth reputing. The facts repute what you wrote all by themselves.

Posted by: Searchin4Truth | September 2, 2008 1:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Unlike Barack Obama, Sarah Palin does not feel that having a child is a punishment.

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008 1:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman and one who appealed to the Republican's conservative evangelical base."

So you somehow 'know' why someone was picked. Couldn't have been because of talent or anything just because she's a woman. What a sexist thing to say.

"I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country. "

You can speak for yourself but who are you to speak for the Republican party and all women?

"But is she ready to be president?"

She is running for Vice President. Barack Obama is only 47 and he is running for President. So, what is your point? Oh yeah, she's just a woman. I forgot.

"And now we learn the 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is pregnant. She and the father of the child plan to marry. This may be a hard one for the Republican conservative family-values crowd to swallow. Of course, this can happen in any family. But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother."

Uh, doesn't Barack Obama have children? Should he be out away from home so much solving the world's problems when they need a Daddy?

"McCain claims he knew about the pregnancy, and was not at all concerned. Why not? Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil. Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well."

You're only mad they both didn't get abortions.

"McCain's cynical choice has created a dilemma for many women. For still-angry Hillary Clinton voters, they will have to decide if they want to vote against their concscience and political interests by voting to elect a Republican woman who's even more conservative than McCain."

Oh dear god. Not a conservative! Couldn't we vote for some lesser evil than someone who is, gulp, a conservative?

"Evangelical women also will have to decide if they will vote against their conscience by voting to put the mother of young children in a job outside the home that will demand so much of her time and energy."

Get over it lady. Conservative women do it all the time. And they do it well. Without complaining. They are accomplished and content to be working mothers who can and do have it all.

Southern Baptist leaders like Richard Land and Al Mohler have praised McCain's choice. But these are the same men who support this statement from the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message:

"A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation."


"Palin's lack of experience and her family situation are both valid and vital considerations here, especially when she will be running with a 72-year-old presidential candidate who has suffered four bouts of a deadly cancer."

I look forward to reading your complaints about Barack Obamas lack of experience and the age of his running mate. I am sure it will just as insightful as this mess.

"And by the way, how can McCain call Barack Obama unqualified, inexperienced, not ready from Day One, not able to be commander in chief, and then put someone like Palin in a position that is a heartbeat away from the pesidency?"

Thats a what a Vice President is and does. I think your logic is flawed. The question is how can you complain about the experience of the number 2 slot but put up someone who has roughly equal qualifications by time in service for the number one slot.

"I don't blame Palin for accepting the position. How could she or anyone turn down such an opportunity? I was once in a similar position. After four years of reporting at the Washington Post, I was chosen by CBS to be the first network anchorwoman in America, to co-anchor their Morning News. I had never been on TV a day in my life. I was 32. There were women at CBS who were much more qualified than I was and certainly other men. They chose me because they wanted a woman. I didn't even want the job, but I didn't feel I could turn it down. Of course it was a disaster. I lasted four months. I wasn't ready for Network TV. Palin isn't ready to be leader of the free world."

I am not sure your career bio here is all that comparable. But hey if it makes you feel good about yourself to compare an anchor job to being VP of the USA you go for it.

"The calculation on the part of the McCain people is clear. Palin's candidacy could draw some of the 18-million Hillary Clinton voters who are not happy she lost and who want to vote for a woman on a national ticket. Palin is not of Washington and that will be appealing to some. Most importantly for McCain, Palin is decidedly anti-abortion and that will keep the Republican base under control and appeal to some evangelicals who might be considering Obama. She has a son who is headed to Iraq."

And the problem is?

Those are positives for a McCain-Palin ticket, but what about the negatives?

"She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy."

Governor of a State. That is political experience. And Barack Obamas foreign policy experience is? Yeah, I can't think of it either.

"That fact that she is not of Washington also will be difficult for her."

Whatever.

"Barbara Bush once told me that her husband had been a congressman, UN ambassador, ambassador to China, and head of the CIA and they thought they were prepared for the vice presidency (under President Reagan). But she said nothing can prepare you for the criticism and scrutiny of being in the White House. Sarah Palin is not prepared for that."

Because you know her so well? How do you know what anyone can and is capable of? Really these insights are amazing. Are you pshycic? Can I have next weeks lottery numbers?

"Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job? She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome. Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make? I'm the mother of only one child, a special needs child who is grown now. I know how much of my time and energy I devoted to his care. He always had to be my first priority. Of course women can be good mothers and have careers at the same time. I've done both. Yes, other women in public office have children. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has five children, but she didn't get heavily involved in politics until they were older. A mother's role is different from a father's."

So, if you aren't republican you can do it all. Otherwise, please go sit down and tend to your babies. I notice you failed to use a single republican or conservative as an example of someone who has done both. Interesting.

"These are dangerous and trying times for the entire world. This is no time to to play gender politics. The stakes are too high. And given McCain's age and history of health issues, the stakes for choosing a qualified vice presidential candidate have never been higher."

Which makes Barack Obama an even riskier choice. He has NO, and I mean NO, executive branch experience, at any level of government. But, hey, lets pick on the girl.

"Maybe this will work. Maybe McCain will win with Sarah Palin as his running mate. But if he does, it will be for all the wrong reasons."

According to you. But you seem to have an ax to grind.

Posted by: Bobby Bishop | September 2, 2008 1:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

And what "CONCRETE" experience does OBAMA bring to the table?


Yes he can read a teleprompter like there is no tomarrow. HE has spent MOST of his 1st term Senate position RUNNING FOR PRES... HE VOTED "PRESENT" OVER 190 times ... THIS DOES NOT SHOW LEADERSHIP ... it shows he is a patsy...

Posted by: Al | September 2, 2008 1:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is a smart, tough, accomplished woman who made it on her own and not on the coat tails of her husband. I'm confident she'll withstand the withering attacks from the left and hope that the vile criticism hurled her way will motivate voters to give McCain/Palin a landslide victory in November.

I have many friends on the right and the left of the political spectrum and I feel compelled to say that those on the left, overall, show more prejudice, intolerance, disdain and downright mean spiritedness than my right of center friends.

Posted by: stella e | September 2, 2008 1:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What a bunch of liberal CRAP from a newspaper that is so far left its not funny. I am a proud Republican MALE that thinks this is a good pick. Mccain, Obama, Biden have had no Executive Experience. At least she has run the state of Alaska as Governer. As a male Republican I say Great pick.

Posted by: JLP | September 2, 2008 1:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is a smart, tough, accomplished woman who made it on her own and not on the coat tails of her husband. I'm confident she'll withstand the withering attacks from the left and hope that the vile criticism hurled her way will motivate voters to give McCain/Palin a landslide victory in November.

I have many friends on the right and the left of the political spectrum and I feel compelled to say that those on the left, overall, show more prejudice, intolerance, disdain and downright mean spiritedness than my right of center friends.

Posted by: stella e | September 2, 2008 1:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn,

You are a pethetic two faced hypocrite! Your double standards, unprofessionalism and bias are exactly why I so despise the drive-by media. Why don't you scrutinize liberals as much you do conservatives! Why didn't Obam pick a pro-life VP to "reach out" to conservatives? Why are conservaties so abused by the rag media?

You two-faced elitist snobs, crossed the line on this one. If Obama gets elected, maybe I can agree with his former pastor and pray "not God bless Ameria, but God ____ America"! I certianly already feel that way about the crap you call journalism!

Posted by: Brian | September 2, 2008 1:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So... You spend the first half of your piece excoriating the evangelical position on a woman's role...

Then, the second half of your piece parroting it. Your quote: "A mother's role is different from a father's." Women's first duty is to their children... Mothers of young children are not qualified to be VP..

Oh. Ok.

Pretty shameful.

Posted by: Denise | September 2, 2008 1:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Sarah Palin was a man with 5 children, one a special needs, would anyone ask if he should be home with the children?? And please, tell me how do you know what she is and is not prepared for? I do not know who I am going to vote for, but I find this one of the most sexist articles I have read in a long time.

Posted by: dam2rem | September 2, 2008 1:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

I challege you to a debate on the issues with Mrs. Palin.
My money would be on Sarah!

Posted by: Pete | September 2, 2008 1:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is a smart, tough, accomplished woman who made it on her own and not on the coat tails of her husband. I'm confident she'll withstand the withering attacks from the left and hope that the vile criticism hurled her way will motivate voters to give McCain/Palin a landslide victory in November.

I have many friends on the right and the left of the political spectrum and I feel compelled to say that those on the left, overall, show more prejudice, intolerance, disdain and downright mean spiritedness than my right of center friends.

Posted by: stella e | September 2, 2008 1:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

sally, what an utterly plebeian and silly hit piece. i think you are published because you're a woman, it can't because of merit. you've opend your mouth and your brain fell out.

Posted by: stormin norman | September 2, 2008 1:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is a smart, tough, accomplished women who made it on her own and not on the coat tails of her husband. I'm confident she'll withstand the withering attacks from the left and hope that the vile criticism hurled her way will motivate voters to give McCain/Palin a landslide victory in November.

I have many friends on the right and the left of the political spectrum and I feel compelled to say that those on the left, overall, show more prejudice, intolerance, disdain and downright mean spiritedness than my right of center friends.

Posted by: stella e | September 2, 2008 1:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally's "On Faith" blog isn't about True Religions.

It's about the ONLY PROVED FALSE RELIGION - Socialism/Communism!

It killed 150 Million last century and ruined billions of lives, so hey lets give it another try with Obama/Ayers!

They want to take your money, your car, your guns and your free speech.

Then party all night with the dictator and whisper who gets dragged out to the football field and gets shot in the morning!


Posted by: Now I Get It! | September 2, 2008 1:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My first reaction was shock. Then anger. Ben Bradlee chose a columnist simply because she is a woman and one who appealed to his own sexual interests.

It has happened before, of course. I thought we were past this. Apparently not. Bradlee's choice of Sally Quinn as an editorial columnist is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win readers. It is a political gimmick. And it's very high risk. I find it insulting to women, to the readership of the Washington Post, and to the country.

It's a shame that talent no longer rules the roost at the Post.

Posted by: David Rogers | September 2, 2008 1:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"This is nothing against Palin. From what little we know about her, she seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person."

Yes, and Obama certainly seems clean and articulate.

Posted by: WTF | September 2, 2008 1:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin should have said "no thanks I have a baby that needs me"....selfish and unqualified.

Posted by: GS | September 2, 2008 1:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally:

You clearly are such a liberal mouthpiece you have no idea what you are actually talking about when it comes to the female Republican base. You have never really talked to or tried to understand the type of people who support Sarah Palin and her family. First off, we are smart enough not to blame the mother for the daughter's mistake. Many "Family Values" voters will vote for Palin because she is supporting her daughter through this and her daughter is living the values of the family in her choice. Most real people have a young member of their family who has been through this -- it's really not the end of the world. Their life may be more challenging, but it is certainly not over.

I find your feeling insulted by the Sarah Palin pick an insult to women who do not think just like you. We sit here and we take the opinions of the liberal elite media on the left and right coasts by the shovel full. So much so we do not even care anymore to read your tripe (the only reason I found your article was because of Drudge), but Sarah Palin as someone representing another breed of American Woman -- has fired us up! So be careful what write. So far, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Sarah Palin has no national experience, you are right. But she has run more executive experience than anyone on the presidential ticket -- ANYONE. Including McCain. So I am not worried about her learning whatever is missing. No one is ready to be president until they are - NO ONE.

Barack Obama had no experience in Washington until he ran for office so he could immediately start running for office. As far as I can tell, all that guy has done is run for office.

Hillary has an admirable Senate record (at least she has done something) - though I am a woman who does not agree with Hillary Clinton's positions. She would have been the better candidate. She could have won, I think. Barack Obama -- despite the 80,000+ acceptance audience, will not win. I did not think he could win before Sarah Palin, I really don't think he can win now. America is a lot savvier about what they want than the 87% liberal media thinks. We are not you, and unfortunately for you -- we are more of a science experiment than actual people with a mind.

Teenagers get pregnant all the time, yes even the children of evangelical's -- perhaps a public figure dealing with this out in the open will bring much needed attention to teenage pregnancy. Who knows? Honestly, I am not that concerned about it, I think the Bristol Palin news is a net wash. Most American people give people the benefit of the doubt. Teenage pregnancy is not a "platform" the country really needs to worry about in these challenging times.

You think the Republican women are all about family values and being pro-life. I honestly don't vote on those issues (yes, some do) -- as a small business owner, I vote on which candidate is going to let me keep more of my money! Inherently, I am pro-choice, but more importantly than being pro-choice, I am pro-business.

You can spin it all kinds of ways, but people will support Sarah Palin, especially if the likes of you start saying we won't. So keep it up -- get us riled up more. The Republican party just got engaged, Sally, and we are going to stay that way.

Posted by: Tracy | September 2, 2008 1:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

lol so what we are saying is that Hands on Mothering is the best form of Birth control available???

Please.

Evangelicals have gone through this experience many times prior to Sarah Palin. We realize that people make their own choices in the passion of the moment. We also realize that parents dont hover over their children 24 hours a day.

Shame on Ms Quinn for such a condescending tone.

Posted by: Allen | September 2, 2008 1:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks for the typical Washington DC left wing establishment opinion.

I'll bet she won't be going to any of your clubby parties either; even if you invite her. I hope shes in the White House for the next 16 years.

Just to annoy snobs like you.

Posted by: Dave Westphal | September 2, 2008 1:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

She has more experience than Obama does. And he is on the top of the ticket. I disagree with a major part of this op ed. Palin is a regular person not a Saint and not a washington insider. Those are positives. The fact that Bristol is prego is more testament that she is a regular middleclass mother of 5. I liked the pick from the start. Finding out about Bristol did not change my opinion.

Posted by: Ricker | September 2, 2008 1:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is more proof that the obama msm is freaked. The GOP VP has more experience and better qualified than the radical dem presidential nominee.


Obama to the attack!!!!


Go MSM obamabots, GO!!!!!!

Posted by: Jack Kennedy | September 2, 2008 1:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks for the typical Washington DC left wing establishment opinion.

I'll bet she won't be going to any of your clubby parties either; even if you invite her. I hope shes in the White House for the next 16 years.

Just to annoy snobs like you.

Posted by: Dave Westphal | September 2, 2008 1:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You mentioned Nancy Pelosi. THis is one appallingly airheaded dingbat. How dare you compare her to Palin who is obviously smart, tough, and not a phoney. Pshaw.

Posted by: lpmaynard | September 2, 2008 1:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The "elitist" media strikes again.

Posted by: Red State guy | September 2, 2008 1:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, my dear, you are SOOOOO out of touch with us women in fly over country. I wasn't voting for McCain, but I am now.

Posted by: mythril57 | September 2, 2008 1:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Q:How can you tell McCain made the right VP choice?

A: By the breathless & hysterical overreaction of the sit at my desk and pontificate liberal media.

Posted by: Ken Madden | September 2, 2008 1:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How sexist.. If Palin's name had bee Joe, or Frank, this would not be an issue.

You and you liberal ilk have just set woman’s rights back 100 years my dear. Chew on that for a bit...

Posted by: DJP | September 2, 2008 1:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Chris:

What could be so difficult to understand about the fact that she has executive experience? Do Barack, Biden, or even McCain have executive experience running a state and making executive decisions?

Look at it this way. Senators are the HR of the political world. They are sideways facilitators of equal representation of workers and management. They work to make things go smoothly and advocate situations for workers on all levels.

But this does not make them prepared for executive positions that require make difficult impactful decisions without the benefit of polling, overpragmatism and limitations of their influence as non-executives.

Palin actually has experience as an executive, not just as a middle functionary. So this brings the question back again, what other of the current candidates for president or vice president who has executive experience and not just HR experience. Don't hold your breathe until you figure it out tho.

September 2, 2008 1:14 PM | Report Offensive Comments
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Are you kidding me? Are you absolutely kidding me? You know who else had what you call "executive experience"? George W. Bush. That turned out great. He definitely made his own decisions and completely ignored polling or, hell, anything the American people wanted. Yeah what a great president. To the heart of this question,

You are all Token Christians, Token Evangelicals, whatever you wanna call it. The whole country. If you were really half as religious as you claim to be, this country wouldn't be so messed up. Your only concerns are bigger churches and getting rid of the "Fags". You do your works to be seen by men and for your own glory. You pass judgment whenever possible and never look in the mirror. You're more concerned with abortion than the poor. Caring more for the unborn than those who are already here.

"Oh but the unborn have no one to speak for them."

Yes they do, their parents. And your opinion on how they should handle it is irrelevant.

"You will be judged by how you treat the poorest among you".

This country will be judged harshly. Very harshly. Next time you get the feeling to talk down to someone else take a moment and think of how many times you could of helped someone less fortunate than you and didn't.


You seem to be perfectly fine with hating the gays, cause the Bible told you to, when it really didn't. However you get mad at me for wanting to own slaves, even though it too is endorsed by the same book.

"Family values" voters? Who the hell decided you get to define family values? If a family loves one another, then that is enough. You can take your "values" and stuff'em.

Posted by: Luke | September 2, 2008 1:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Being a "WASHINGTON INSIDER" is your problem, you need to get out and visit with real folks! I think you will be real suprised what this lady can do.

Posted by: JB | September 2, 2008 1:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Is this a pattern in the Palin family? Because that says something to me.....I mean wasn't Sarah the role model whom also got pregnant and ran off to the alter? Is that what family values means? John McCain's judgement has failed. And giving them our vote would take our country, women, and the next generations back in time. And NOT a good time. We all need to move forward and fix the huge and numerous errors that have been made by the Bush administration. It really seems like an easy choice.

Posted by: doyourhomework&vote | September 2, 2008 1:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Perhaps someone can explain why we should be concerned that Sally Quinn believes the Republican party has been "insulted" by Sen. McCain's choice of Sarah Palin. She is neither a Republican nor a evangelical Christian. The real hypocrisy is with Sally Quinn, not with the Republicans or the Christians.

Posted by: Chuck Grimm | September 2, 2008 1:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a Barak supporter and support his statement to leave families out of this. I don't think much of Palin - but think this is her family's business - and not ours!!

Posted by: EGN - Denver | September 2, 2008 1:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

STEWART, YOU ARE SO CORRECTOMUNDO !!!!
Had little Bristol run to one of their government sponsored death camps, and if Palin was a liberwacky, they would all be fawning over her !!!

Posted on September 2, 2008 10:38

Stewart:
What a load of BS. If Governor Palin were a democrat and took her daughter to an abortion mill you would be lauding her as a hero. Instead, her daughter made "the choice" to keep her baby and marry the father, and somehow that is anethama to the liberal Democrat sensibilities. What a bunch of hypocrites.

Barack Obama has even less executive and foreign policy experience than Governor Palin, yet all of you left-wingers are wetting yourself over what a maven of 'change' he is. As one wag put it, 'change' is all you'll have left in your pocket if he's elected.

Posted by: Chuck1 | September 2, 2008 1:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Seriously, this whole nonsensical left-wing hit piece boils down to this: "It is a choice made to try to win an election." Go figure - trying to win.

Posted by: J T | September 2, 2008 1:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'd say you're not half the woman Palin is.

A mother of 5, an effectivge and wildly popular Governor, and a woman who swam upstream against entrenched interests all her life.

What have you done, Sally, besides word crafting for others who think just like you?

You've been riding the easy current down your whole professional life.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

Posted by: Maine's Michael | September 2, 2008 1:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your very first paragraph was used to go after Sarah Palin's seventeen year old daughter who's personal life is absolutely off limits. She is not the candidate for public office. Joe Biden and Barack Obama are candidates so are you assuming that neither never had sex outside of marraige?

Personal matters aside, you mention that Sarah Palin has limited executive experience. This is true, however, her executive experience as Governor of Alaska is greater than that of both Obama and Biden combined. Neither candidate on the Demoratic ticket has any experience at executive level whatsoever yet they are running for the highest executive office in the land.

Posted by: Ric | September 2, 2008 1:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This "article" was a pathetic stab at making Palin out to be "unqualified" for the VP position. She has a young child and her daughter is pregnant, so that means she cannot serve as VP? What ever happened to "I am woman, hear me roar!" mentality of the feminists like Quinn? So the author is saying women are incapable of raising a family and holding a demanding job? What about all the women executives and business owners out there? Which is it? Either women can or can't be mothers and hold demanding jobs, not both. It's hogwash like this article that makes people want to vote against Obama even more than they did before.

Posted by: Henry | September 2, 2008 1:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally - what a bunch of horse squeeze!

Posted by: Kat from GA | September 2, 2008 1:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin recieved more votes as a Mayor than Biden as a Presidential candidiate!

Posted by: pete | September 2, 2008 1:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, it seems you overlooked the primary reason McCain selected Palin as his running mate. She is qualified. In fact, she is more qualified to be President than Obama, which I am sure you are shilling for.

Posted by: shoefan | September 2, 2008 1:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin recieved more votes as a Mayor than Biden as a Presidential candidiate!

Posted by: pete | September 2, 2008 1:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is the best analysis of the choice of Sarah Palin I have read so far and I completely agree with you with the exception of the fact that I think as a mother, who loves her children,she should hsve rejected the offer.This is puting her Career before her Family.I just can not understand how the evangelical world are spinning this.Well, its Mcain's VP choice and they are sticking to it....maybe

Posted by: nicholas badams | September 2, 2008 1:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

no my friend no no my friend. sex sells. Why????? because of you and the rest of the media. get a grip already. Politicians don't do anything anymore for anyone anyways. Whats the difference. God. There just in it for book deals and speaking tours after office run. God don't be so uptight

Posted by: kevin | September 2, 2008 1:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So, let me get this straight.

Only women who don't marry/contracept/abort (the last two being grave sins and offensive to God) are qualified to be leaders. Children are a "distraction." Ipso facto, all (married) women who take the moral demands of Christianity seriously are disqualified from leadership until they are roughly 60.

Liberalism is very misogynistic.

Posted by: John | September 2, 2008 1:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Blah blah blah blah....The liberal left in pounding away at the credentials of Sarah Palin, both as a mother as well as her credentials as a leader of her communitee and state, reinforce their ingnorance of American values and the perspective of politics today. Yes, there are those whose greatest stand as Democrats is their position on Iraq, so be it, but not all Dems are baby killing left leaning liberals.

This and other writers choose to focus on Ms. Palins inability to progress as a professional in her field of endeavor by attacking her motives and denigrating her ability to balance that with her obligations of motherhood. Now that is a laugh when a liberal left leaning Dem is espousing the obligations of motherhood. When I was 20 I was in the military, married to an active duty woman who happend to be an aircraft sheetmetal mechanic withan AP license. With the birth of our first daughter we shared in the responsibilities of parenthood and still maintained our professional obligations. Do you not think that Mister Palin is capable of making dinner, cleaning a house, and caring for the children as well as his wife. Many right thinking (not leaning) Republicans are working class Americans that identify with the values that mark the Repulican ideal. We work hard and suffer the same pains as others but still stand by beliefs of right to life, lower taxes, and an economy based on those that risk what they have to succeed and provide to others benefits of employment. Open your eyes and "see" what Obama has to offer, it is not hope, but nothing more than smoke and mirrors. Sarah Palin can be the spirit behind the American dream and show everyone that the way things were run in D.C. are not what they may have been.

Posted by: David Noret | September 2, 2008 1:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Judgmental.

Posted by: june | September 2, 2008 1:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, you are taking pro-Obama media bias to a new level! How can you say that Governor Palin was chosen simply because she is a woman?!! It's wrong to state this just because you don't happen to agree with the choice. By your reasoning, Senator Obama is the Dems choice simply because he's a black man. He's far less prepared for the presidency than she is! Why do liberals constantly harp about feminisim and women's rights then turn right around and make ridiculous statements like you have written. If a conservative was to say that Palin shouldn't run because she has five kids that need her to stay home you and all the so-called feminists and other liberals in the country would go postal! You can't have it both ways, Sally: Either you support equality of the genders or you don't.

Posted by: Steve | September 2, 2008 1:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Many of the people responding to this article just don't get it. It isn't about being a "good" person. It is about being a good person FOR THE JOB! Sally made great points.

The fact is that this woman advocates certain PUBLIC policies for our American youth and women regarding sex education and abortion rights. Now we have seen these policies fail in this woman's own home. So now she is marrying off a 17 year old girl to save face? Can she really focus overseeing that family situation? This brings up serious questions about judgment AND focus. Both of which are needed.

Sally is dead on. A father's role is different than a mother's. Not to say that I speak for 100% of all homes, but most I know the mother is the nucleus of the family. Can she be that nucleus AND be VP? I doubt it.

The fact that people defend this insanity says a lot about what American's expect from their leaders. McCain has shown once again that American politics is fundamentally flawed and that the flaw might be the ignorance of the people.

Posted by: Sad So Sad | September 2, 2008 1:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is the best analysis of the choice of Sarah Palin i have read so far and i completely agree with you with the exception of the fact that i think as a mother who loves her children,she should hsve rejected the offer.I think she is puting her Career before her Family.I just can not understand how the evangelical world are spinning this.Well. its Mcain's VP choice and they are sticking to it....maybe

Posted by: charlesnichol@comcast.net | September 2, 2008 1:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How many women who have had their intelligence "insulted" would have whined about Hillary Clinton's inexperience if she had been chosen to be Kerry's running mate after two years in the senate? I'm guessing not many. Unless, of course, they are less insulted by a woman who would not be able to get elected mayor of Podunk Arkansas if she used the name she had BEFORE she got married, holding any elective office. How many of the insulted women count Hillary CLINTON'S experience as a first lady as one of her qualifications for the presidency and how many of them would say that Todd Palin is gaining valuable experience for a future run for governor?

Posted by: Walt Lacey | September 2, 2008 1:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Come on Sally couldn't you rouse up a brainless Hey, Hey, Ho, Ho chant against Palin like they did in your good ol days? That would have rounded out your screed.

Please all you anti-American losers in the media and university - just move to N Korea and live the life you truly deserve! You add nothing of value to society!

You will be happy and we will be happy and it will save us the unpleasantness of forcing you to go when you once again fail to move after an election.

Go Now!

Posted by: What No Mindless Chanting? | September 2, 2008 1:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin is more qualified than Obama, having had an actual job as an executive. Sure being Mayor and Governor for less than 10 years total might not compare to a life long Washington insider like Biden or a Career Senator like McCain, but she's been the one making decisions and having her name on the line. She didn't have the cover of the legilature to say "well 50 other Senators agreed with me".

It's great that she can run her family and the State of Alaska at the same time. Wasn't that what Nancy Pelosi said when the Democrats took over Congress, that she could do both as Speaker?

What a joke, sure McCain pandered a little by picking Palin, but so has every other pick. Just because Obama picked a career politician who was suspended from law school for plagerism, doesn't mean McCain had to also make a bad pick.

We should honor Governor Palin's career and acomplishments instead of treating her like a female "Uncle Tom".

Hillary spoke of Democrat sexism, Obama proved it with his "sweetie" comments to several reporters, but once again the liberal women of America place liberalism over their priniples. These are the same women who said an employee could never have a consensual relationship with their boss, well unless it's Bill Clinton. These are the same women who scolded Bob Packwood and praise Ted Kennedy.

I guess the Obama Kool Aide is part of Ms. Quinn's DNA.

Posted by: Stephanie Stevens | September 2, 2008 1:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

For the good of the country, Palin should withdraw herself from the VP slot. Let McCain select another candidate. There is no other solution.

Posted by: Walter Lobo | September 2, 2008 1:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is interesting to watch the media with the opions they have that are so biased and censored it is rediculous.

Here a reporter is claiming that the reason a women is chosen is only to get the womens vote. You will see that the womens vote will be split probably 50/50 or very close to that.

However nobody has mentioned that the black vote will be 90/10 because a black man is on one ticket.

If it is newsworthy for a women on one ticket for votes why not make it known a black man will garner 90% because he is black not the better man.

Posted by: Edward Leh | September 2, 2008 1:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are an idiot and a *itch!

Posted by: LCR | September 2, 2008 1:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It just dawned on me that what is happening, to paraphrase Obama's quote re:abortion, is that the Media really is trying to "Punish the Palin's for the baby" (or in this case, babies). Wow!

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008 1:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Silly. This is not a serious article.

Posted by: Pete | September 2, 2008 1:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn we expect better.

Posted by: Please elevate the discussion Ms. Quinn | September 2, 2008 1:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's just sad and ironic that the two most scathing op ed pieces I've read today about Sarah Palin were both written by, well, females. Why do women seem bent on tearing each other down? Is it especially insulting to liberal women that one of their own gender could be, oh-my-gosh, a conservative?

If you see cynicism in McCain's choice, consider for a moment that you just may be projecting it. She's a maverick. He's a maverick. It's actually a fairly good fit.

Posted by: Josh | September 2, 2008 1:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey Sally, you know what they say about opinions, right? Well, bend over and look in the mirror; that's about how much value your opinion holds on this topic.

Posted by: scooter55 | September 2, 2008 1:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

ATTYLAURA said, "By voting for McCain Palin, I am voting for true change." The only change you're voting for is a change in the size of teenage wombs.

Posted by: Immoral Pregnancy | September 2, 2008 1:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The Washington Post and Sally Quinn are both clueless. The paper and its employee writers will never undestand the country until you literally move out of Washington (and from the East Coast). If you have an interest in saving the company/newspaper and if you are ever interested in reporting in an unbiased manner, move to the midwest, live as most Americans do, and send the articles in over the internet to the publishing house.

Posted by: KE | September 2, 2008 1:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I read an article recently that heralded Sarah Palin’s “decision” to give birth to a Down’s syndrome baby. Here is my question: If she’s staunchly pro-life, why was there a decision to be made? I’ve known a few pro-life women who had unplanned pregnancies later in life. In each case, they refused amniocentesis because they would never consider abortion under any circumstances.

Many will say that this is a personal matter; but abortion, by it’s very nature is always personal. And, given her extreme position on abortion, I believe she should explain what she means by “decision.” Even with her strict pro-life position, she is granted the freedom to decide via Roe v. Wade.

Posted by: RF | September 2, 2008 1:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"They chose me because they wanted a woman. I didn't even want the job, but I didn't feel I could turn it down. Of course it was a disaster. I lasted four months. I wasn't ready for Network TV."

Please don't project your inadequacies on another just because you share the same gender.

Posted by: Ron Rogers | September 2, 2008 1:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin is a smart, tough, accomplished women who made it on her own and not on the coat tails of her husband. I'm confident she'll withstand the withering attacks from the left and hope that the vile criticism hurled her way will motivate voters to give McCain/Palin a landslide victory in November.

I have many friends on the right and the left of the political spectrum and I feel compelled to say that those on the left, overall, show more prejudice, intolerance, disdain and downright mean spiritedness than my right of center friends.

Posted by: stella e | September 2, 2008 1:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What could be so difficult to understand about the fact that she has executive experience? Do Barack, Biden, or even McCain have executive experience running a state and making executive decisions?

Look at it this way. Senators are the HR of the political world. They are sideways facilitators of equal representation of workers and management. They work to make things go smoothly and advocate situations for workers on all levels.

But this does not make them prepared for executive positions that require make difficult impactful decisions without the benefit of polling, overpragmatism and limitations of their influence as non-executives.

Palin actually has experience as an executive, not just as a middle functionary. So this brings the question back again, what other of the current candidates for president or vice president who has executive experience and not just HR experience. Don't hold your breathe until you figure it out tho.

Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008 1:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Democrats,

I am shocked of your judgment towards Gov. Palin and her 17 yr. old daughter. At age 17 according to Sen. Obama, he was drinking excessively and getting high on hard drugs such as blow.

As far as Sara parenting have you forgotten Joe Biden's first wife died but he continued taking the train back and forth and attending to his children.

Interesting that you would show such tunnel vision. Were you all virgin's on your wedding day??? You point out the sliver in there eye and cannot clearly see for the log in your own....

Posted by: Greg | September 2, 2008 1:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Here's the question: would "journalists" like this even think about questioning whether a male politician was enough of a "hands-on" parent? Interesting how she decries playing "gender politics" when she is clearly doing the same...

Posted by: JB | September 2, 2008 1:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sunshine complains about Edwards "Love Child" while some of us consider the child a "Lust Child" of course through no fault of its own.

Posted by: myrna abdel-gawad | September 2, 2008 1:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a woman, but not an Evangelical. I am an independent who was leaning to Obama once he selected Joe Biden. I am now for McCain-Palin and, for the first time in my life, I have signed on to volunteer for them. She brings to the ticket something many Americans will find attractive- a true outsider who has cleaned up corruption and is poised to do more of the same in Washington along with John McCain. I am sick of the partisanship in Congress, sick of how the Dems have control there but have done no better.

By voting for McCain Palin, I am voting for true change.

To those women like you Sally who find the choice insulting, I say fine. Why so angry though? If she is indeed such a ridiculous and inexperienced choice, shouldn't you be elated? Doesn't this mean that your Man will be in the White House?

Why such vitriol? The elitism is showing through because anyone who would choose Palin must be "uninformed." Yea right. Keep underestimating her and then just watch them take office come January.

Posted by: attylaura | September 2, 2008 1:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm curious Sally, are you indicating then that women should stay at home with Children? Are you implying that men can not watch over the children? In all fairness - the VP jobs will be all consuming (as far as time goes), but what make a woman any less than a man? I am a single father of 3 and manage just fine. Indeed, I have a full time job, just completed a Masters Degree, and manage my kids just fine. I don't see any reason Mr Palin can not pull his weight and manage the household chores while his wife focuses on the VP job. Because she has a 5 month old with DS, because her 17 year old daughter is pregnant, the woman's focus should be on the family - yet you seem to forget there are two parents in the relationship. Way to hold up women put them back to the 50's!
On your point about experience....we have all these politicians (from both parties) that have worlds of experience - yet American confidence in all this 'experience' is at an all time low! This 'experience' is contributing nothing to the average American. The Dems blame it on the Rep. yet do nothing about it! The Dems blame Bush for the failed foreign policy, yet they have failed to act in countering his policies. This is why we have the three branches of government - to ensure one branch does not wield total power. No Sally, your argument of 'experience' holds little water with the average American. We are all fed up with Washington (not to mention a biased media), we want 'change' we can count on. That change must come from outside WA DC. I believe the average American will warm to Mrs. Palin as they continue to push away from a biased media reporting (commentaries) as already evidenced in the drop in readership of all national news publications. It is this biased reporting that forces Americans to look outside the national publications to get a clearer view of things, to see through the fog of media manipulation.
I’m not swayed by your opinion, nor should other educated Americans be!

Posted by: Harold - Seattle | September 2, 2008 1:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"...who has suffered four bouts of a deadly cancer."

If it were deadly, he'd be dead moron.

Posted by: dave | September 2, 2008 1:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

" Joe Olson: Choices:
Would you get on that next flight into bad weather if you knew the co-pilot has only flown model airplanes?"


If the other plane had a PILOT (not co-pilot) who hadn't even flown model airplanes, but only talked about it, then I sure would get on that first plane.

It's about the #1 person first. Let's keep the experience debate going, it only weakens Obama further.

Posted by: InnominateUser | September 2, 2008 1:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin must be respected as a Governor of Alaska.

The surprise, no! the shock though is this fussy talk of Palin in keeping with human values.

Values? Really! If Palin is someone who practices high moral values, of course -- with the hope of spreading her good values, her children -- Child Bristol Palin must have learned enough values to know that having a child at 17 is completely an adverse good human value.

Of course, there are wakie kids, Palin children do not or should not fall in the "Wakie kids" category.

Palin's 17-year-old pregnant child puts many questions on this wild noise about Palin values.

Allen Alex

Posted by: Allen Alex | September 2, 2008 1:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Palin is so bad, why aren't the democrats having a victory party now? Instead, they're running scared plastering the internet, TV and papers with the most desperate arguments I've ever seen.

If Palin is so bad, why are all the republicans elated and the independents so interested?

She's got everyone excited and energized, which answers both questions.

Hang in their Governor Palin. They only hate you because they fear you.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 1:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, what a sad and bitter column. I think libs are just mad that Gov. Palin's daughter didn't have an abortion.

Posted by: Paul Ross | September 2, 2008 1:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn wins the prize for the most sexist column in recent memory.

The liberal reaction to Palin's daughter's pregnancy exposes mainstream feminism's subservience to hard-left extremism.

If Republicans suggested a woman politician should quit campaining and spend more time with her family, the media would call them backwards, misogynistic mouth-breathers.

But since the woman in question is on the Republican ticket, all feminist "principals", all that blather about "reproductive choice" are forgotten. Get back in that kitchen, Sarah! Rattle them pots and pans!!

Posted by: S.O. in Seattle | September 2, 2008 1:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Who's going to look after her daughter's child while she attends college? And if she doesn't go to college what kind of message does that send to young Americans. Mc Cain has lost the election. He should be ashamed.

Posted by: CT Sadler | September 2, 2008 1:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn knows of what she speaks. She got her job by marrying the boss.

Posted by: wwpl | September 2, 2008 1:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If McCain's choice is cynical, the voters will see through it. I however believe McCain's choice was shrewd. Sarah Palin seems to be a quick study, which neither Obama nor Biden seem to be. Also, Palin has actual governing experience. Barry has none. And Palin is also of the people. Barry is not. It is interesting that journalists now seem to recasting the election as a the race between Obama vs Palin, when Palin is the far less consequential half of the Republican ticket. So be it. Barry comes up short in every way against Palin, a true political reformer. Barry's long and sordid involvement in Chicago politics makes him nothing but a water carrier for the usual left wing Democratic suspects and election fixers.

And talk about cynical. Barry would not be the Demo candidate if he were not African American. Just who is Sally Quinn trying to kid?

Posted by: Greg E., | September 2, 2008 1:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You're a dinosaur, Sally. Clearly, you are only a FINO (Feminist In Name Only) - or, better stated, a self-appointed Feminist as long as it carries the liberal tag and supports abortions. Why should women care what you think, or if you are upset with McCain's choice of Palin. You no better represent the feminist movement than Barry Bonds represents integrity in baseball.

Posted by: FINO | September 2, 2008 1:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, some of you are just ridiculous. Obama was ELECTED to be the party's nominee (not SELECTED) as is the case with Palin. He has also been scrutinized and under the national spotlight for the last 2 years; sat on the Foreign Relations committee, lead and controlled what could arguably been seen as one of the best and largest campaigns in history, traveled abroad and shown his strength in his judgment by the way he has ran his campaign, chosen his VP pick and on the Iraq war.

By comparison, Palin has less than 2 years experience of governing a state with less population than that of the city of Chicago, coupled with being investigated for abuse of power (wow, already within 2 years). Has had no national scrutiny (and has 2 months to make up for it). Has no foreign relation experience (admittedly did not know much about the Iraq war)and has praised Obama's energy plan. She will be expected to be a #2 who will have a fairly high chance of having to step into the #1 slot, and she crushes McCain's main arguments to Obama (experience and celebrity). It was obviously a political move done because McCain was shaking in his boots during the Democratic Convention; and I can only pray that women will see beyond the obvious pander and see that she will set womens rights back years and that Hillary herself would be ashamed to see anyone vote for her. (If only she would just come out and say it).

Posted by: Ryan | September 2, 2008 1:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, nice to be so sanctimonious.You have no idea living such a privileged life, the quality of Sarah Palins character.
She is my hero.

Posted by: comfortquilts | September 2, 2008 1:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

hmmm Palin sounds like Bush...
has similar values to Bush....

Anti-abortion, pro-creationism, pro big oil, anti-sex ed and pro abstinence only (a message that was completely ignored in her home) pro guns...

Seems alot like 4 more years of the exact same thing.

Posted by: Ghost Nyc | September 2, 2008 1:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You better give it a rest. If you journalists start pounding on Sarah and not examining Obamas career or lack of one, then you will lose the race for sure. Obviously the media is all rooting for the Obamiden ticket to win and you will do anything to destroy a decent woman, her family, and her career. Obama has never run anything in his life except his mouth. Oh, that's right, he has run for office non-stop and hasn't done squat in the Senate except run for President.

Posted by: steve | September 2, 2008 1:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I feel sorry in a way for young Levi.

People talk about 'shot gun weddings'. Here the girl's mother is a gun toting hunter with the entire NRA backing her. And conservatives needing the assurance that Young Levi will 'do the right thing'?

Seriously. A Shotgun Marriage? Is that the wise advice we need to give girls (yes, as a father of daughters she is a 'girl')in this situation? Maybe this handling should give people pause about a person who might be involved heavily in the development of social policy...or that little issue the current VP is hot about- blowing Iran to Kingdom come.

Posted by: poorrichard | September 2, 2008 1:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ok...we get it. Talk about cynicism against women. Do you actually think that evangelicals will be upset because of a pregnant daughter? Events happen within families and that is when 'family values' matter the most in dealing with a situation.

You are a demdocratic hack. Try some other spin. This just doesn't work.

Posted by: bjmck | September 2, 2008 1:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally...
You were in a SIMILAR POSITION ??
Wow !!! You must have been processed through the same AFFIRMATIVE ACTION sinkhole that bo and company had the pleasure of. He came out of it thinking he was much more superior than his qualifications TOO !!
I love it when you compare your 'FOUR YEARS' reporting.. to be consequential !! What did you do for those 4 years ?? ..sweep the floor ?!
If you had attended a real school of journalism, you would have had the principles to lay out bo's accomplishments and platform vis a vis Palin's and then comment on them.
You would see that bo's community and state senate work revolved primarily working in conjunction with liberal fraudulent programs.. assisting ACORN.. training their now criminal (indicted and convicted) staff in the art of voter registration (a euphemism for voter fraud, when done in Chi-town !!... bo votes 'Present' most of the time on issues presented to him.. maintaining an empty suit status, so he can go either way !! Associates like rev wright, ayers should disqualify him from DOG CATCHER !!
Palin has Enery Management executive experience. She has international experiene, managing two borders.. Canada, and RUSSIA !! She has more executive management skills than all 3 other candidates.. she is more principled than all 3 put together, and THAT is what I believe is such a catalyst for you liber-wackys to attack her !! How dare she turn the apple cart over !!

Posted by: Chuck1 | September 2, 2008 1:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Because apparently it is no problem for a man to have a small child in the whitehouse, but if a woman has a small child in the VP house it is utterly impossible for her to be able to do her job. If that's not sexist, then I don't know what is.

Posted by: Phil | September 2, 2008 1:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally...
You were in a SIMILAR POSITION ??
Wow !!! You must have been processed through the same AFFIRMATIVE ACTION sinkhole that bo and company had the pleasure of. He came out of it thinking he was much more superior than his qualifications TOO !!
I love it when you compare your 'FOUR YEARS' reporting.. to be consequential !! What did you do for those 4 years ?? ..sweep the floor ?!
If you had attended a real school of journalism, you would have had the principles to lay out bo's accomplishments and platform vis a vis Palin's and then comment on them.
You would see that bo's community and state senate work revolved primarily working in conjunction with liberal fraudulent programs.. assisting ACORN.. training their now criminal (indicted and convicted) staff in the art of voter registration (a euphemism for voter fraud, when done in Chi-town !!... bo votes 'Present' most of the time on issues presented to him.. maintaining an empty suit status, so he can go either way !! Associates like rev wright, ayers should disqualify him from DOG CATCHER !!
Palin has Enery Management executive experience. She has international experiene, managing two borders.. Canada, and RUSSIA !! She has more executive management skills than all 3 other candidates.. she is more principled than all 3 put together, and THAT is what I believe is such a catalyst for you liber-wackys to attack her !! How dare she turn the apple cart over !!

Posted by: Chuck1 | September 2, 2008 1:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a man, I'm also deeply offended by the insinuation that Mr. Palin is unqualified to take care of the children.

Posted by: InnominateUser | September 2, 2008 1:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maybe she'll become another Margaret Thatcher ...
as a Reagan Democratic I find that thought pleasing.

Posted by: doityourselfweather com | September 2, 2008 1:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I would also like to know how Gov. Palin represents the Republican family idea when she has evidently raised at least one loose daughter, supports sex before marriage, and supports teenage sex, all of which are clearly sins against God?

Posted by: Question 2 | September 2, 2008 1:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The suggestion that the ONLY reason McCain picked Palin is because she is a woman is one of the most shortsighted, sexist, and offensive things one can insinuate.

Posted by: InnominateUser | September 2, 2008 1:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Let's contrast Sarah's de-facto accomplishments to the documented record of Joe Biden. In spite of the fact that Obama's 3:00am VP announcement was a direct, and not-so-subtle, slap at Hillary and her supporters for her Primary criticism of his notorious and painfully evident inexperience, the Clintons are ecstatic over Obama's pick of "Jawbone" Biden as his VP. A man who can speak eloquently ad-nauseam while saying absolutely nothing of substance. Biden, advertised as the brain-trust for the Obama ticket, is the same foreign policy "expert" who told the Israelis that they would have to passively accept a nuclear armed Iran, which of course would eventually guarantee the destruction of their Nation. The same individual who stated that the "Surge" was doomed to failure; and, who promoted the partitioning of Iraq into three separate nations, which would have precipitated a violent Iraqi civil war; and, assured the eventual incorporation of Shia Iraq into Iran. Sounds more like a single digit IQ than an expert! The McCain camp will certainly exploit Biden's former prolific praise of McCain; his multiple assertions that Obama was not sufficiently experienced to assume the Presidency; and, who correctly noted that the White House was not the proper venue for Obama's: "On-The-Job-Training". Obviously Obama was smart enough to recognize that he needed a "Handler" close-by 24/7; and, no-doubt has scheduled Biden for remedial training in diaper changing. It's a good time to invest in "Pampers". It's become apparent that Obama has some insidious need to constantly poke the Clintons in the eyes. One has to wonder if an "angry" Michelle Obama is prompting such responses! However, the Clinton's, astute in the way of politics, will simply re-enforce their base of supporters in preparation for a now certain 2012 bid. Greg Neubeck


Posted by: Greg Neubeck | September 2, 2008 1:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Horrible analysis.

Posted by: James | September 2, 2008 1:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You just don't get it. This isn't gender politics to choose a conservative, energetic, telegenetic conservative woman to "walks the walk" is precise what John McCain and the Republicans need.

Posted by: Scott Crowley | September 2, 2008 1:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Bravo Sally Quinn! I remember your debut on CBS. Yes, you were chosen because you were blond, young, and attractive but definitely not ready for prime time.
You have framed this topic correctly. Obviously Sarah Palin's husband was not qualified to educate or supervise his children. Now the 17 year old will marry and he will have another supervision chore. Is this really Family Values?

Posted by: myrna abdel-gawad | September 2, 2008 1:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, are you really comparing your past failure to Mrs. Palin's ability to be VP? If that's a valid comparison, then it's also a valid comparison to BA's ability to be President. It doesn't seem like that's a road you want to go down.......

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 1:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

SHAME ON YOU SALLY!! How dare you pass judgement on Governor Palin and her family. I feel sorry for you and I think other readers will too. You are a mean woman. Wow...following your words...my first reaction after reading your article was shock!! Shocked that another person would spew such comments about another and that you actually signed your name to it! Shame on you.

Posted by: KW--Kansas City | September 2, 2008 1:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's okay for SEN. JOHN EDWARDS, a FORMER CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT and VICE PRESIDENT, to have a LOVE CHILD, but NOT the DAUGHTER of a V.P. CANDIDATE?
Sally, have you even MENTIONED or ACKNOWEDGED Edward's child in any of your columns?

Posted by: sunshine484848 | September 2, 2008 1:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn.

Wow and thank you. This is the first analysis I have read that makes so much sense. Coming from a woman who truly believes in womans rights I have to take a step back and ask myself, would I knowingly choose to put my 17 year old pregnant daughter in a position where she will be scutinized beyond belief for my own selfish reasons? I only hope not.

As a mother of two children, divorced, forced to find a meaningful job, I was continuously questioning my "quality time" with my childen. Was it enough? etc. How is it possible for a woman with 5 children, two of them needing her so much, make such a judgement call. It is contradition.....


Posted by: tc2000jt | September 2, 2008 1:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The liberal, left-wing has been putting many other things out about Sarah Palin. What about the equal rights liberals have, I thought, believed in for so long? I thought liberals believed a woman was as capable as a man. And, men were capable of parenting children. Mr. Palin is involved with the family. Liberal social policies have not destroyed the Palin family.

Are there any liberal, left-wing beliefs a liberal, left-winger would not throw under the bus of politics? The question is this, what do left-wing, liberals believe in and which of their beliefs will they stand up and defend no matter the political circumstances?

A Republican stands up and defends basic principles that do not change based on the political circumstance.

A democrat will attack a gay Republican with the most hateful, homophobic, anti-gay, inhuman and inhumane language one can imagine, while the Republicans will see the gay Republican as a human being deserving of human compassion, treatment and concern because they are still a human being. They are a life and have value and deserve compassionate understanding because all of us are fallible and imperfect.

The women of America are watching the democrat party and their liberal, left-wing media. Know this; the democrat party will experience a backlash from the women of America and the Hillary supporters because of that party's amateur, illogical, anti-female attacks against Sarah Palin.

Keep floating these left-wing, liberal attack talking points but know that America will not buy it!

Posted by: larsim | September 2, 2008 1:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I totally agree with you on all levels. You stated this in the most sensitive and diplomatic way so far. I as a woman and mother am offended that the McCain campaign selected a woman with five kids and a baby with down syndrome and a 17 year old preganat daughter. This just demonstrates to me that they do not care anything about her or her children.

I am sure this was an offer of a lifetime and they did not fully vet her --but who can blame her for taking the offer? I think this leads to McCain's judgement or the lack thereof. All the issues you outlined is so troubling to me about this selection (e.g. a daughter that is pregnant at 17: the need for more not less parental involvement; a four month old baby with down syndrome: need for more not less parental involvement. There is a greater role for mothers than fathers whether people want to admit it or not.

How many fathers are away on business travel and cancel their trips because their babies are sick? Her lack of national and foreign policy experience; the fact that she has only traveled abroad once speaks volume to what pitfalls she will experience in this role.

She is not at all prepared for the scruitny she will be confronted with! Actually I feel sorry for her and therefore will not vote for her-to save her!

Posted by: Speaking Truth to Power | September 2, 2008 1:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Evangelical women also will have to decide if they will vote against their conscience by voting to put the mother of young children in a job outside the home that will demand so much of her time and energy."

bet you never thought of yourself as sexist.

All the canidates have children, who all would love to have their parents more envolved in their lives.

Posted by: newmexican 4 mccain | September 2, 2008 1:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I just realized that secular people, especially those in the press, seem to think Christianity is a set of rules, and when you don't follow them, or your children don't, they have to leave the faith. Which misses one of the major points about Christianity--forgiveness of sins. Thus this strange kind of thinking that the evangelicals will be put off by the fact that Sarah Palin's daughter got pregnant and is keeping the child. You couldn't do anything they would like more! This also points to the truth of Bishop's The Big Sort. America is dividing into two cultures and we're sorting ourselves out by geography, and tend to know little about the other, and demonize them. In general the secular press has so little contact with evangelicals, or even religious people, that they don't know this. As Al Hunt said last night on Charlie Rose, he couldn't figure out the disconnect: the hall was thrilled about the choice, but outside in his world (the press) they weren't. Two cultures, it looks like, both of which the evangelicals are fully aware of, but the secular types are not.

Posted by: gg | September 2, 2008 12:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find it interesting that so many people focus on comparing Obama to Palin. I find that concerning that Obama supporters are focusing on the merits of Obama of Palin. I thought I was trying to decide on Obama vs McCain for President.

It seems to me that focusing on Obama's qualifications and experience vs Palin's is not really a good thing from Obama's perspective since at best it seems to be a wash, yet it's Palin who is running for the #2 job.

Still undecided but leaning more and more towards McCain/Palin as the Obama supporters are doing more to push me that way than to pull me their way.

Posted by: Undecided in WI | September 2, 2008 12:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My sentiments exactly, except one thing. She could and should have turned him down flat by saying, "my family really does need me now, more than ever".

It has now gone from, "what was he thinking?" on Friday, to "what was she thinking?" by Monday.

I think I know now how I would describe John McCain's personality. "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!".

Posted by: barb | September 2, 2008 12:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Choices:
Would you get on that next flight into bad weather if you knew the co-pilot has only flown model airplanes?
Would you continue with your banker or portfolio advisor if you knew his management experience was only to manage a fast-food joint?
Would you prefer your dangerous/complicated surgery by a veterinarian or a qualified surgeon?
In these very precarious, violent, and complicated international and domestic times, do you really want Sarah Paulin at the helm?

Think about it...

Posted by: Joe Olson | September 2, 2008 12:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The people of Britain had the good sense to elect a grocer's daughter from a small-town named Grantham, also with zero foreign policy experience, to the highest office in the land. She turned out to be the best peace-time prime minister Great britain has ever had. Margaret Thatcher.

Posted by: Sigmond | September 2, 2008 12:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Where are all the so-called feminists who cry fowl and sexism whenever there is a mere hint that a woman with children may find it difficult to balance career and family? What happened to women having it all? What happened to women supporting women because they're sisters-in-arms? Oh, wait, the curtain has finally be pulled aside and the feminist groups and feminists have been shown to be what they truly are - supporters of only liberal women, in general, and liberal women who support all abortions all of the time, in specific. I wonder whether this columnist would have praised Sarah Palin or Sarah Palin's daughter had either of them chosen to have an abortion. Thank you, women of the Left, for proving to the world once and for all, that organizations such as NOW are a sham and that your feminist agenda is really that of the radicalism. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. Then again, as demonstrated by columns such as this, you have no shame.

Posted by: Ken | September 2, 2008 12:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, great article. Ignore all the comments that came from hyperactive Drudge Report readers. Because anyone who uses Drudge as their main source of news is an idiot.

Posted by: Tom | September 2, 2008 12:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin has more experience as a mayor and governor than Obama or Clinton? Are you insane? I think my street in Los Angeles has more folks living there than her town, and her state has about 1/10 of the population living in the LA/Orange County region. By this absurd reasoning, the dog catcher in LA should be VP.

As for who has management skills, someone who was able to win 19+ million votes in the Dem primary certainly has a better case than someone who was mayor of a teeny, non-urban town and a state with less than 700,000 residents.

But keep drinking that fundy Kool-aid. If a VP candidate is not a role model, then who is? Sheet, we're supposed to laud her mothering skills when she goes back to work 3 days after she delivers a special needs child? It is one thing to have to go back to work for financial needs, or to keep one's job, but to choose to go back to work in 3 days? Or to CHOOSE to campaign around the country, and if successful travel around the country and world as VP, with a special needs child and children under 18 at home? What is wrong with you fundy GOP'ers?

She cannot sit in judgment of gays and women who abort fetuses created by rape and incest and expect us to sit on the sidelines and note that she, like all of us, is imperfect. Sorry, that doesn't fly.

And I'm a 2 time Bush voter voting this time for the smart guy, Obama. We don't need incompetent, unfeeling parents who went to second rate schools running this country.

Sara's gonna resign within the week, just like Harriet. Esp. after she screeches her acceptance speech.

Posted by: Becky | September 2, 2008 12:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I have no idea a woman would write like this about Palin, specially a liberal woman.
I do not know why Ms. Quinn was angry? She has a choice, she can vote for Obama. Mr.McCain can pick who he wants and so does Mr.Obama, I thought that is what democracy about.

Posted by: Charles | September 2, 2008 12:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Responding from the U.A.E

Sally, really. As a Southern Baptist and theologian, you totally read in your narrative into the BF&M statement. There is nothing that implies or states directly that a card-carrying Baptist female cannot have a career and STILL run a home in the biblical model. Happens every day. Sorry, I stole your thunder.

Posted by: Craig the Expat | September 2, 2008 12:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

man is the term which denotes the image of God. By herself woman is not the image and by himself the male is not. The two together make the image.

Truman was a nothing before his term. The job shaped him. The question here is if Palin's character can adapt or rise up to the office.

If this columnist is of faith than she should know that our wrong reasons are not God's reasons.

Why are these times more dangerous than any other time. If they are, this country and the way it has become so ideological divided (hot systems with little reflection)will be "lucky" to survive.

Posted by: allen antrim | September 2, 2008 12:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you for voicing all my thoughts!!!

Posted by: Maya | September 2, 2008 12:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

RE: sara ...."Sarah Palin should keep her mind on the human beings she has brought into this world and what they need from her, not what glory and praise she wants for herself."

Do you hold the same standard for BO and his kids? How 'bout HRC and her husband? Maybe if HRC wasn't trying to socialize health care in the 90's, she might have prevented Bill from staining dresses in the White House.

I love it...you libs cannot run away from your hypocrisy. Even if McCain/Palin lose, this is highly entertaining.

Posted by: Andy P | September 2, 2008 12:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are a sexist bigoted woman. You are not pro-woman. You are simply pro-feminist.

Dont tell me you are for women....you aren't. You are only for women that think like you. Your bigotry only holds women down, because you are anti-woman.

Posted by: Arthur | September 2, 2008 12:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess I am a bit concerned by some of your reasoning. Because you were not able to step to the next level and maintain the family life you needed, does not mean others, including Palin, cannot answer the call. I am all for women who want to stay home and raise their families - it is a wonderful thing. There are women out in the real world who are natural bread-winners and natural leaders so why is it such as issue if the husband stays home to be the primary care giver in the Palin home? She is making an extreme sacrifice every day to bring her state, and potentially, this country in line with the beliefs that all conservatives hold near and dear. That commitment could lead this entire nation to a better place in the future (she is pro-life for example). That is important, too. If your point is that she has no experience, leave it at that and stop the speculation that she is a "bad mother" for making the choices she has made. A mother can stay home with her children, yet spend no time with them and/or abuse them, so just staying hoem is not the answer.

Posted by: Charla | September 2, 2008 12:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is ridiculous. Now that the liberals feel threatened by McCain's brilliant pick for a VP, they are pulling out all the tricks. All this talk about her daughter's situation seems like a desperate bid to win the Presidency. Can't win on the issues because nobody knows how Obama plans to handle the issues. Empty rhetoric is all he has to offer. Change, what is he going to change? Better question, how does he plan to change things? He offers lots of promises and not one single solution in his "inspiring" speeches.

Posted by: Richard | September 2, 2008 12:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What an unbelievable load of hypocritical horse crap. My own, personal opinion, but having a special-needs child uniquely qualifiers her for dealing with some of the oversized babies in congress. Add to that her first-hand knowledge of homeland security (believe it or not, governors have to be well versed in all its ins and outs) AND the fact she's commander-in-chief of the Alaska National Guard (probably didn't DO much, but that's still more military leadership experience than Obama) and you have someone who is actually MORE qualified to be President than Barack Obama.

Oh...you say she's missing foreign diplomatic experience? Then, let's just take a page from Obama's book... we'll book her for a 2 week tour of Europe! Let her visit Iraq ONCE for a couple of days to shoot hoops with the troops. Maybe they should book her for a 3 week tour of Europe. That way, she can have MORE foreign relations experience than Obama.

Give me a break...

Posted by: Kevin | September 2, 2008 12:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well Sally get used to Sarah. Just think all the fun you're going to have kicking her around for 4 years. Keep up the good work. With junk like this the Repubs can go about their biz and keep Obambi shuckin' and jivin'. Where is his birth certificate and what State is he admitted to the Bar? Maybe Sarah will invite you to a Moose hunt along with Cheney. Heh heh. Anthony

Posted by: anthony amoroso | September 2, 2008 12:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
Got it - only a women can stay home and take care of a child? Very progressive thinking. Perhaps this is why you support Obama - that seems to be his viewpoint exactly.

PS: McCain really didn't need a women on the ticket to draw that vote away from Obama - Barack is already well on his way to doing that without any help.

Posted by: Mac McDonald | September 2, 2008 12:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I see one of the main GOP talking points has invaded this board as well.

Under this "logic," someone who was governor of Delaware for one day would be "more qualified" to be president than Obama. Now that is some impeccable logic.

Posted by: Laughing at Rightwingnuts | September 2, 2008 12:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well apparently, you know very little about faith. Faith is the belief in things yet unseen.
The Bible says that through God all things are possible.

You use your column not to talk about faith but to bash a incredible woman and place on her constraints you would never place on a man. Maybe Obama in four years will have a pregnant teenage daughter...this could distract him when making critical decisions about some military crisis. What kind of garbage is this.

There was this guy, and he had 1 year of formal education. He served on his states General Assembly for 8 years and was elected as a Representative to Congress for his state and served one term. 18 years later he ran for President and won...What a terrible resume'...for Abraham Lincoln.

Posted by: Kevin Cook | September 2, 2008 12:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

IT'S OKAY FOR SEN. JOHN EDWARDS, A FORMER CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT TO HAVE A LOVE CHILD, BUT NOT THE DAUGHTER OF A V.P. CANDIDATE?
Sally, did you even MENTION or ACKNOWEDGE that in any of your columns?

Posted by: sunshine484848 | September 2, 2008 12:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Do all of you columnists get talking points from the DNC? Your column reads pretty close to one from the Baltimore paper.

The common word out there from the 'family values' voters is that they have compassion for Palin and her daughter, admiration for the strength that Palin has instilled in her daughter, and admiration for them making a tough choice. No need to fret about the 'values voters'; it's the libs that are having a MUCH tougher time accepting Bristol's pregnancy.

And, really, in 2008 you are actually making the argument that we should consider voting against Palin because she should be at home with her kids? Did you consider Barack's young daughters and the absenteeism they will experience should he win? I haven't heard anyone talk about Obama's kids. This is sexist reporting, and the libs, those "feminist" libs, are the first ones to limit Palin because she is a mom. Can her husband not take care of the children? Us forward thinking "family values" voters say 'yes'; the libs, the hypocrits that they are, say 'no'.

And there is nothing cynical about McCain's choice. He didn't choose her because she wears a skirt. He chose her because she is not a Washington insider (something many of us were hoping for, as we have 'inside the beltway' fatigue), she's cut from the same cloth he is in being independent minded, and she is an impressive woman.

Did you also consider Obama's choice of Biden as cynical and political, designed to shore up his liberal base? I think Obama's choice is the insulting one. Obama has run his campaign on change and reform, not 'politics as usual', and has marketed himself as a Washington outsider. I was anxious to see who he would choose, certain it would be another newcomer and outsider. But instead, he completely goes against what his campaign is about, and chooses one of the most liberal Washington insiders that he could possibly choose. Did you take note of that?

Your column does nothing but reinforce how biased and small minded and out of touch the media is with real Americans.

The libs are in trouble. Voters are energized by the choice of Palin, despite the desperate attempts of the MSM to discredit her. Get ready for history to be made as Palin becomes the first woman VP!!!

Posted by: PJ | September 2, 2008 12:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
The degree of hypocrisy in your "article" is startling. You have simply regurgitated the same old lines that keep women from moving up the corporate/political ladder. Simultaneously, you manage to take a shot at the Southern Baptist position on gender roles. What is your position? How does this post relate to faith in the slightest?
Sorry, but I'm having trouble hearing you through all the talking points.

David

Posted by: David M. | September 2, 2008 12:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sure Sarah Palin is just a heartbeat away from the "pesidency " but the man you want in office is the heartbeat and she has more leadership experience than him.The way you liberal media women are attacking her is beyond belief.You are trying to say that McCain picked her just because she is a woman. Well how about this.There are an awful lot of people out here that believe you media people are rooting for Obama just because he is black.He has no qualifications to be president so how can we think otherwise ?

Posted by: Gimpy | September 2, 2008 12:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I sadly agree with all that you have said here.I do not vote Republican but I do respect them for their service to our nation but this is is just not right.Why not just ask me to be the VP I can do a jood job too..
Dennis

Posted by: Dennis | September 2, 2008 12:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You just spent a whole paragraph on why being a mother is not compatible with being in office, and then you say this is no time to play gender politics?

" But she said nothing can prepare you for the criticism and scrutiny of being in the White House. Sarah Palin is not prepared for that."

So if nothing can prepare you for it, nobody is prepared.

Posted by: motherandcareerwoman | September 2, 2008 12:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This effort to bury Palin is just going to backfire. Disgusting that such a sensitive family issue would be covered to this degree.

You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Posted by: Justin | September 2, 2008 12:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally

Was it difficult for Pres. Clinton to find time to run the country when he was busy with personal matters?

Was Gov Spitzer sleep deprived and able to run NY state while being up all night?

Was John Edwards able to campaign effectively while dealing with his special needs situation?

Posted by: Rob Kav | September 2, 2008 12:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You forgot about Bill Clinton???
He was cheating @White House!!on Hillary
when she was in nearby room working.
You also forgot John Edwards cheating on
his wife while he stressed on his family values.
Dem even knew what was going on with Edwards'
couple when they allow him to run for candidate.
Sarah is going to knock down these Old Boy Club
traditions in Washington DC.


Posted by: bibi | September 2, 2008 12:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Quinn is implying, among other points she raises, that there are certain jobs that a woman with children should simply not accept. I am hoping she can be more specific. Can she state when it would be appropriate for a woman with children to hold a certain job? Please tell us how old the children have to be, or how many children you have to have, or how healthy they have to be, in order to be able to take on a certain job. I'm wondering if the woman has a political philosophy more in line with Ms Quinn's would she be able to assume that job at an earlier stage of her life than a woman who has a different political philosophy???

Posted by: Curt | September 2, 2008 12:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are a stuipd cow. If this were a man you would not even question his ability to be V.P. and a parent.

It is because the Governor is a woman, she is weak and not capable of handle family issue like everyone else.

You are a shameful woman. I will vote McCain Palin proudly.

Posted by: Isiah | September 2, 2008 12:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You forgot about Bill Clinton???
He was cheating @White House!!on Hillary
when she was in nearby room working.
You also forgot John Edwards cheating on
his wife while he stressed on his family values.
Dem even knew what was going on with Edwards'
couple when they allow him to run for candidate.
Sarah is going to knock down these Old Boy Club
traditions in Washington DC.


Posted by: bibi | September 2, 2008 12:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The WP is trying to bury Palin and it's going to backfire.

Posted by: Justin | September 2, 2008 12:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is disturbing that someone who claims to be a liberal does not think women with children should be able to have an important job. When my grandmother first became a teacher in 1937 she was told that if she married and had children she should stay at home because "a woman's temperament was such that she could not concentrate on her job when she had children." I thought those days were gone. Apparently not.

Posted by: Amelia 2 | September 2, 2008 12:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are a phony! And you're scared, too, that McCain's choice will energize his supporters and defeat Sen. NObama. Swallow your cynical abus of your column and get ready to move to Canada!

Posted by: Sam | September 2, 2008 12:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

but you don't find it insulting if nobama were to pick billary. you stupid hypocrite!

Posted by: isy | September 2, 2008 12:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment

THE LIBERALS ARE COMING UNGLUED!!! PROOF POSITIVE MCCAIN HAS MADE THE BEST CHOICE!

By the way...what was Obama doing at the age of 17? GETTING STONED!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Amen

Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why should you be angry at McCain's choice, that he chose Palin simply because she is a woman? The Democrat Party chose a candidate for President simply because he is black. You know that Obama wouldn't be anywhere near the nomination if he was white. So, my advice to you is, Get a concept of justice into your brain. Do what your mom told you: Be Fair, Judge Righteously. Sally Quinn doesn't have to be so obviously partisan and biased to the point of blindness . . . But she is.

Palin might not be qualified, but Obama isn't even close.

Posted by: MacMoe | September 2, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with Sally 100% in fact, I feel that the choice of McCain of Sarah Palin as his running mate was possibily the worse choice he could have made. By this decision he has just reinforced my opinion that his he too old and not capable of making responsibile decisions for as the President of the United States of America. Sarah Palin should keep her mind on the human beings she has brought into this world and what they need from her, not what glory and praise she wants for herself. I only hope that the voters can see this for what is really is and realize that voting for McCain is bad for our country in every way.

Posted by: Sara | September 2, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well said....

Posted by: Jim MacKrell | September 2, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The way the elitist socialist left thinks they are tricking religious people!

Like SF Nan!

Now Silly Sally!

Keep it up!

You don't know how to drill for oil but you sure know how soak yourself in gasoline and set yourself on fire!

After the MSM have their run this week attacking Palin - McCain will be a lock!

Yeah!!!!!!

Posted by: I'm Trilled!!!! | September 2, 2008 12:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Selective quotations taken out of context are always the sign of a desperate argument. Immediately preceding the selection Ms. Quinn provides, the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message statement states:

"The husband and wife are of equal worth before God, since both are created in God's image. The marriage relationship models the way God relates to His people. A husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. He has the God-given responsibility to provide for, to protect, and to lead his family."

Now that certainly sounds a little different from Sally's abridged version--which, coincidentally, is an odd quote for Ms. Quinn to choose, since she explicitly encourages Ms. Palin to stay close to home and hearth instead of running with McCain.

Posted by: Winston Smith | September 2, 2008 12:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you for your article. I hope many normal women read it; it should help the McCain/Palin ticket.

Posted by: Brian | September 2, 2008 12:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So, women can have the same things as men as long as you approve of the timing? What an insult to the women you are trying to scare away from the McCain-Palin ticket. Te idea that she would be alone on an island should John McCain win, and heaven forbid pass away. I'm sure that we would find away to rally around our new president and help her, especially the new vice-president (which would make the oval office look a lot like Obama-Biden would if they win). That is except for the DNC with their pointing fingers and the Daily Kooks with their typing fingers. So when you cheered for the "ENOUGH" call from Mr. Obama, it wasn't from hyper-partisanship.

Posted by: nhraider | September 2, 2008 12:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How about we get indignant about the democrats choosing a wholly unqualified candidate for PRESIDENT? The guy has four years in the Senate, the last two spent on the campaign stump. If you don't like Palin and her family situation fine, don't vote for her. But calling her unqualified, that is utter nonsense.

Posted by: Jacob | September 2, 2008 12:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am offended by your suggestion that if a daughter gets pregnant that it means the parents were incompetent.

This news brings to home that it TRULY does happen in the best of families. I happened to us. My wife and I were the most hands-on parents you can be. Involved with my daughter at home and at school. Always involved, always knew exactly where with whom she was with. It happened. She made a mistake. I now have a lovely four year old grand daughter. My daughter graduated from college and is married to a young man going to Law School.

Could she have aborted the bady and gotten back to life as usual. Of course, but we've respected life all our lives, even when it was inconvenient.


Posted by: hands-on mother? | September 2, 2008 12:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How to justify critics of Obama's inexperience with picking Palin for VP? Simple, if she ever ends up being President, all she has to do is pick a 29-year Washington bureaucrat to be her VP and everyone will call her a genius... She has more governing experience and business experience than any of the other three on either ticket. Get over it.

Posted by: MarkHReed | September 2, 2008 12:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

See if I got this right. It is okay to elect a man that said he would kill an unborn child so that his daughter wouldn't have to live the rest of her life with a mistake.

But is not okay to vote for a woman that supports her daughter's decision to keep her child and marry the father.

More important than experiene is sound judgement, character and integrity.

We will not have the luxury of aborting the mistakes that Obama makes as president.

Posted by: Greg | September 2, 2008 12:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally and her fellow foot-shooters,

Please, oh please keep piling on Sarah Palin. The Republicans couldn't ask for more. In fact, the GOP ought to be paying you for the stupidity backlash you are about to bring on.

Keep it coming, oh most highly intelligent one. We need more. Please add even extra condescension as well. I understand the NY Time is about to help the cause by making the same mistake tomorrow. Unbelievably good news for the GOP.

Wow. Talk about snatching victory out of the jaws of defeat. I can't believe conservatives complain about the MSM when they keep paying off for the GOP in such huge ways.

I just can't keep some smiling these days...

Posted by: Uneducated, unwashed masses | September 2, 2008 12:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Test

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The reason you werefired from your TV gig is because you sucked. Not because you wereen't ready. You have a face that is made for radio!!
Keep typing and eating those pretzels.

Posted by: I remember you on TV | September 2, 2008 12:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Please re-read your article and then replace Mrs. Palin with Mr. Palin. Then please re-write your article. I bet you will be shocked at how short your article will be.

Posted by: David McConaha | September 2, 2008 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
You're just another Washington lefty who doesn't get it...you and your friends on the left can trash the women all you like, the fact is... she will be our next VP..So suck it up babe.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You assume too much. Unless she is flat out stupid, she understood the sacrifices that would be made, and the fact that the Media would hang her family's wash out to dry, no quarter or fairness given....and still she accepted. My guess is that she ia a believer. She believes in many of the things I do, and many things you obviously do not.
I have a friend whose child is Downs, and that friend was 22, with no family history. Stop trying to blame Ms. Palin for her child chromosomal makeup. With the advances in diet and education, many Downs children grow into adulthood as productive members of society...you can't say that about all "normal" children.
You have one of the premier schools for such children right up the road from Washington. The Benedictine School in Ridgely, Maryland...a hop, skip and a jump from the White House. Couldn't be more convenient.

Posted by: joanne | September 2, 2008 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey, "ISA", you're a bigger fool than Sally Quinn!

Posted by: Gator_Rick | September 2, 2008 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Not sure if this is meant to be satire or if you are really this hypocritical.

Posted by: Joe Average | September 2, 2008 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is just another viciously jealous liberal Washinton leftist. In backing the likes of Obama to lead this country as president, she is spotlighting her inability to understand what America is, and rather than face reality, she's quite amenable to destroying all which the Founders created for us. Vulturizing a seventeen year-old teenybopper brings hate to a new level.

Posted by: steve | September 2, 2008 12:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So Obama's move was not calculated? You have no facts to back up your cynical claim either. How is it Obama is that much more qualified than Palin? Also by your reasoning Obama having 2 children will also be distracted by being a dad. Is there really anything that prepares someone to be president or vice-president, short of the experience itself?

Posted by: Neocon1 | September 2, 2008 12:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

People who write faith columns often seem to know little about others with a real faith. This becomes especially clear with this article. Real people of faith may not want their 17 year old unwed daughter to become prgnant but they can be loving, forgiving and understanding, this may cause some noise, but mostly from the left.

A political move? Of course it's a political move this is politics. Your fooling yourself if you think Obama picked Biden as a friendship move. These decisions are about politics. If Maverick MCCain picked her to pacify the conservatives it would be the first time and a smart move.

Is she ready to be president? Much more than Obama. Most likely she will be VP for a while though.

And you complain that she has a special needs child. Suddenly having a special child keeps you from living the rest of your life? I'm sure she will have plenty of help.

Personally I'm not overly in favor of a women for VP, but of all the women, she is a pretty good choice and a smart choice and there is nothing cynical about that choice, just your article that is cynic.

Posted by: Larry Amon | September 2, 2008 12:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,

Why are you so threatened by Sarah Palin?

Sarah Palin is far more qualified for an executive position than Obama - on Day One. Shouldn't you be championing Palin instead? Shouldn't she be held up as an example of what a woman can accomplish in a 'man's world'?

Shouldn't McCain get credit for selecting a VP running mate who is more qualified on Day One than Presidential candidate of the other party?

How the mainstream press (and you) are portraying Sarah Palin is disgusting.

Posted by: Tony B | September 2, 2008 12:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is nothing against Palin. From what little we know about her, she seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person. She certainly has been successful in her 44 years. But is she ready to be president?

You can say exactly the same thing about OBAMA!

And he isn't running as a VICE-presidential candidate...

Posted by: Alex | September 2, 2008 12:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hillary was wrong when she said "I takes a village". The truth is "It takes a family". The love and support of her husband and children will carry her through as well as whatever "outside" help that is afforded to the Vice President.
I was on the fence before the announcement and I am now DEFINITELY VOTING FOR MCCAIN/PALIN.
YOU GO SARAH...YOU GO JOHN MCCAIN!!!

Posted by: Father of Three Girls | September 2, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Do you have children? If you do, you would have known that children are not robots and will do everything you ask, expected of them. Each child is an individual with their own mind. To judge Gov. Palin by her daughter's pregnancy is ridiculous.

Personally, I have not make my mind yet. I'm willing to see how she perform in a debate before judging her qualifications. I suggest you do the same before attacking her.

Posted by: Kelly | September 2, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think Palin rocks! I am on board with McCain/Palin. In a word, AWESOME!

Posted by: Anthony | September 2, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm glad women are saying this.

http://markploch.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Mark Ploch | September 2, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn proves beyond all doubt that she doesn't have a clue about REAL American women. Poor Sally only hangs around the Beltway. Palin wears a skirt and can defend herself with a gun. Wow, Sarah for President.

Posted by: Gordon Bloyer | September 2, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn is obviously a DGI (don't get it).

Posted by: Alan | September 2, 2008 12:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article is embarrassing. Palin has more experience than Obama or Mrs. Clinton. She has been a Governor and a Mayor. Obama has been running for President longer than he has been in the Senate! Also, we shouldn't judge people based on the actions of their children. Look at Al Gore's son and his drug problem. Hello. He was Vice-President and did ok in my opinion.

Posted by: Clint Brown | September 2, 2008 12:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I felt this hit the nail right on the head. I am a thoroughly independent voter, not wanting anything to do with any political party. So I was keeping an open mind to McCain, but this ended any possibility of him getting my vote. Picking a vice president should be done with responsibility and with the best interests of the nation in mind, especially if you are a 72-year old with a history of cancer. But McCain picked one that is obviously designed to help him win the election, and nothing more.

We can debate about lack of qualifications, say that Obama is the same, etc, etc, etc, all we want. But this is all about McCain. This man who may be president made a very strange, risky, and self-serving decision, one that made me nervous about what other decisions he may make in the White House.

Posted by: leetz | September 2, 2008 12:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin's strength of character is evidenced by her personal history and accomplishments. Obama at 46, is still looking for his character. Liberals must think character is a figure in a movie. McCain/Palin 2008 has a good ring to it.

Posted by: Sigmond | September 2, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally -
Do you realize that if you read your words on whether Palin can handle caring for her children and being VP 20 years ago....you would have been outraged at the sexist comments and the negative attitude that women can't do both!

It really is unbelievable that you can't see this.

-Patti

Posted by: Patti | September 2, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yeah, if she were Obama's daughter her parents would counsel her to abort in order to avoid being "punished" with a baby. No question that the 17-year-old should not have gotten into that situation, but at least she's not compounding her moral failure by murdering the child.

Posted by: Matt Cvetic | September 2, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey, Sally, she's certainly more accomplished than you! And she's more qualified than that stupid, racist, Marxist, empty suit Obama that all of idiots in the left-wing media suck up to. You are despicable!

Posted by: Gator_Rick | September 2, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"You aren't really in favor of electing women to high office. You are only in favor of electing women who agree with you! What a farce!"

Don't most people--if not every voter--choose which candidate to support based on similar positions?

I think it is unfair to point at Mrs. Palin's experience considering Mr. Obama has very little and he is running for President. However, Mr. McCain's intentions are quite transparent: he hopes to snag the disgruntled Hillary supporters and attract the social-conservative base. This VP selection will be successful for bringing the conservatives. If the Hillary supporters needed one reason to avoid McCain, he has given it to them in the-polar-opposite-of-Hillary Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

YOU MUST BE JEALOUS

Posted by: DOG WATCHER | September 2, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So if a woman with several years of executive leadership experience is not qualified enough to be VICE president, how can someone with NO years of executive leadership experience, and whose entire senate career has been spent campaigning, be qualified to be President?

The liberal bias of the media never ceases to astound me. How can Obama, as a minority and with his experience, be a savior, while Ms. Palin, as a woman who also has a very impressive track record, be a moron.

I am no McCain fan, but he is a lesser evil than a tax and spend Democrat with documented socialist leanings.

Posted by: Todd | September 2, 2008 12:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I concur with your comments and review of the Palin situation. Furthermore, and even more important is her position on issues and her pre-govenor position on earmarks and the Bridge to Nowhere. In favor of both, and post govenor election, against. Seems she wears two faces.

My issues are many with the Palin choice. First is her ability to become President if the call comes. But, more concern goes to the judgement of John McCain. He was rash in his judgement and goes to many who say he shoots from the " HIP " and then deals with the consequences.
VP is not something to take so lightly.

I am concerned and this has helped me shore up my belief that the Obama/Biden ticket is much stronger. I am an Independent and have been for over 20 years.

THANK YOU

Posted by: Will Schulak | September 2, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find it very humorous that after all Hillary went through with the way it was portrayed how she was treated bt the Obama campaign and the sexist that the same standard does not hold to a Republican female candidate! I find it appalling that women on the left find a reason to join their male counterparts in calling into questions another woman's character when it comes to how she raises her children!

The Left has lost all credibility on this topic. Is it only women on the Left that are qualified to hold high office? Women who have had abortions or put career before family?

You could stoop no lower by attacking a 17 year old young women who subscribes to the very principles that the Left encourages in all women.. to be in control of their own bodies! hmmmm, that doesn't apply to Republican families?

Well, I for one will be happy to cast my vote for the Mcain ticket just to piss you hypocrites off!

Posted by: John - San Diego | September 2, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

WOW all the Liberal Haters sure know how to express their prejudice..

To bad they have nothing useful to say..

BUT hey what do you expect from a person afflicted with NEOCON KoolAides..

ISA

Posted by: ISA Gallego | September 2, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

A much better article on this subject: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26501011/

Posted by: Independent from California | September 2, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The author (and many others in the media) are totally ignorant of what real evangellical voters think and how they will react.

Here you have the first woman nominated for Vice President in the Republican Party and the media couldn't even wait 3 days before they starting digging for dirt on her.

And using a special-needs baby to question Palin's qualifications or dragging her 17 year old daughter into an election campaign is only going to reflect badly on the press-not Palin or McCain.

You are going to be surprised at the backlash but then again, those who live in an echo chamber often are surprised by the REAL election results.

Just like Kerry in 04.

Posted by: ironchefofmunchies | September 2, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Using your position to support the sexism against Palin is rich. You apparently don't have much else to say to convince your readers that Senator Obama has qualifications for the top job. No, you choose to spend your time piling on the sexism toward the qualified candidate for VP. It is precisely that Governor Palin poses significant problems for the Dem ticket that you take such risks. Compare and contrast Sally. You're clever, I'm sure you can find something to demonstrate that Barack has an achievement other than writing about himself and running for office.

Posted by: Susan | September 2, 2008 12:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Brilliant move. This article could just as easily have been written about BA. Every word written and read about Palin's inadequacy and lack of qualifications will redound about Obama. There will be many attempts to make Palin out to be not up to the task while trying to avoid the comparisons with Obama. But, they will be there. She is being compared, not to Biden, but, to Obama. Not sure if we will ever hear of Biden again.

Posted by: bigmaq | September 2, 2008 12:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Both McCain and Obama are trying to win the election, genius, so if you haven't been living in a cave your entire life you might want to consider that everything both of them say and do is intended to get votes. Its called politics. If you think McCain overlooked Palin's lack of experience in things like foreign policy and chose her simply because she's a woman, you are drinking the Kool-Aid. She's a smart white girl who did not grow up in politics but was still able to rise on her own merits from the lowly PTA to governor, where she's made positive changes, all the while raising a family. Regardless of the argument she lacks experience, why isn't she a true American success story? Why is experience-lacking Obama and his story so much more inspiring?

Posted by: Reggie Hammond | September 2, 2008 12:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah won't have to choose between job and family. She and McBush will lose by the biggest margin since Goldwater/Miller in 64

You heard it here first!

JP

Posted by: joel palmer | September 2, 2008 12:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

another angry woman....

Posted by: wow | September 2, 2008 12:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally:

I always knew that you were a useless, partisan left-wing hack at a newspaper full of useless, partisan left-wing hacks, but now I know you're also stupid.

Ben's getting old...Don't you have any more homes to wreck?


Posted by: Dr. Right | September 2, 2008 12:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

what did Ms. Quinn say that is untrue? Isn't it grotesque that a woman with a 5 month old special needs child is running all over the country running for office? Palin is willing to tell others that they must bear the child of incest or rape, yet we cannot judge Palin's parenting, or her daughter's lack of moral character? Palin is willing to deny gay Americans their basic human right to marry, yet we are supposed to pretend that Palin's failure to be a good parent is a 'private' matter?

This isn't about who is pro Christian or anti-Christian. This is about Christians in politics who see their role as sitting in judgment about the rest of us who do not share their religious beliefs. If they didn't quote to bible verses about gays, we wouldn't point to bible verses about fornication (which is what dear Bristol was doing).

As far as experience and judgment is concerned, McCain loses to Obama on this one. When the first choice had to be made, for vp, someone who could be president, Obama chose someone with gravitas, skill, true family values (commuting to be with his sons while trying to do his job was certainly family values), and experience. McCain cynically picked a woman (not that many Hillary voters will go for her) who panders to the alleged GOP base. I say alleged because that noise you hear is the slamming of the door by GOP moderates like me who cannot stand how the party has been hijacked by hypocritical family values fundys.

The issue isn't experience per se, it is judgment, and McCain has little. He is a short-tempered, quick decision man seeking a job that needs more temperance and deliberation.

Lastly, the Obama 'experience' issue compared to Palin. Let's start with the most obvious difference==Obama ran for his party's nomination, and won. Palin was picked after McCain met her once or twice, and didn't really vet her at all. That alone demonstrates his management skills far beyond those of Palin or McCain, whose campaign was in the crapper for most of the past year, who won because fundys were afraid of a Mormon. Now, McCain caves into the fundys to try to get elected. What kind of values does that show?

Then we can move on to the quality of Obama's experience. Just living in Chicago (forget his legislative experience for the moment) makes him vastly more qualified for the job--some keep harping on foreign policy experience, but we have urban and suburban problems too, and someone who has been governor of a state with a population exponentially smaller than most major US urban/suburban areas has no idea how to deal with urban/suburban problems.

Then when you add on the legislative experience that Obama has had, including a successful run for Senator, Obama vastly exceeds Palin.

Lastly, let's talk about education. Obama went to Columbia and Harvard, majoring in real substantive, foundational subjects like international relations and law. Sarah has a degree from U of Idaho (seemingly without honors) in journalism, something so many of you claim is a worthless endeavor.

Sara Palin is less qualified for VP than Harriet Miers was for the Supreme Court. Sad that McCain is so cynical.

Posted by: Becky | September 2, 2008 12:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You elite liberals just don't get it. We love the fact that Sarah Palin is grossly uninformed and has a poor educational background. It's something we can throw back in your faces when McCain wins in November. We eat this stuff up.

I expect to see the McCain polls soar in the next two months. The Dems have been out-smarted, once again. The Dems... so "smart", and yet so dumb... Yuck, yuck!

Posted by: John Rosselli | September 2, 2008 12:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you've been in Washington to long!

Posted by: Nancy | September 2, 2008 12:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The left wing mainstream media is going absolutely insane over the Palin pick and have gone totally whacko over the disclosure of her daughter's pregnancy. You must really be terrified that center right America will win this election too. Sorry.

Posted by: Al J | September 2, 2008 12:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Shame on you! YOU are cynical for insinuating that a woman can't "handle" a job because she has children. She hunts moose, has babies, AND fights government corruption! Governor Palin is living proof that Women CAN do it all!

Posted by: Eliza | September 2, 2008 12:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess Quinn thinks Palin is the wrong kind of woman, not a liberal woman, just like Condi Rice is the wrong kind of black woman, not a liberal one.

Posted by: Sigmond | September 2, 2008 12:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn doesn't age well. An aging lib who leaves no stone unthrown when it comes to attacking Republicans. Time and life have rendered her irrelevant. Even Obama has said that the subject of Palin's daughters pregnancy. Perhaps Quinn would have been more supportive of the daughter had she chosen to abort the baby rather than have the child and marry the father.

Posted by: Tony Rohl | September 2, 2008 12:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sounds like a democrat who is REALLY worried now!

Posted by: Derek B. | September 2, 2008 12:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm tired of the media focusing on the candidates' lives, whether they have a crazy uncle, or urinate standing up. The real issue is who is best equipped to govern the country and the answer is John McCain. No, he's not the ideal choice, but between the two, McCain is the lesser of two evils. Obama is nothing more than an empty shirt who thinks "governing" is a photo op.

Posted by: Mike Jefferson | September 2, 2008 12:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

the sad fact is that Palin has more executive experience experience than Obama, Biden, or Hillary.

Posted by: Mike from Saline | September 2, 2008 12:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is interesting that the same scrutiny isn't given to Obama. He is far less qualified than Sarah Palin. To make the excuse that she was chosen "simply because she is a woman" to vent your frustration is so transparent that it is laughable. Why isn't the same argument given to the first "black" candidate. Isn't that a "gimmick" also? He has no qualifications to become President. He became the media darling because he was embraced due his "uniqueness". However, the same excitement isn't resonating through the liberal media for Ms. Palin. Mainly due to the fact her value system doesn't agree with the elite liberal media's. Shallow and transparent so-called journalist such as Sally Quinn, take cheap shots in an effort to promote hollow arguments to detract from the real issues such as Ms. Palin has more experience to become the Vice President than Obama has to become President. Now that's the real issue!!

Posted by: MHicks | September 2, 2008 12:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm confused.

Why is the "What President Clinton does in his private life has no bearing on his performance in office..." crowd so interested in Gov. Palin's daughter?

Posted by: Bill the Weak | September 2, 2008 12:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This diatribe is disturbing on so many levels it almost begs to be ignored. I'll be brief:
1. Kudos to you for being a self professed 'good mother'. Shame on you for questioning another mother's ability.
2. Kudos to you for saying this is not the time to play gender politics. Shame on you for doing exactly that in this column.
3. Kudos to you for admitting you were not up to the task of a network TV position when you were in your thirties. Shame on you for projecting your shortcomings on someone else.
4. Kudos to you for saying 'this is nothing against Palin'. Shame on you for being disingenuous.

Posted by: Terri | September 2, 2008 12:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Great Obama endorsement.

I find it hilarious you are a moderator On Faith and seem to know nothing about the Biblical view of Palin's pregnancy. I could delve into what the Bible says about man's imperfection but what's the point. It is almost sad to say but Obama's world view it is say abort that child which should be the story.

Also on quoting religious bodies of the church you try to skew what we know they know the Bible means. Submission is a natural response to loving leadership. When a husband loves his wife as Christ loves the church (Ephesians 5:25-33), then submission is a natural response from a wife to her husband. You cannot have one without the other.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 12:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm not even going to refute the mountain of spew in this article while you pretend to be objective. Does the DNC pay the proper amount of taxes for your employment??? I am just going to relish this moment as you Liberal schills display your panic and terror of losing yet again. I LOVE IT!!!!!

Posted by: Jerry O'Laughlin | September 2, 2008 12:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I wonder if Sally has thought of the VEEP picks in this way...??
http://screaminglunatic.wordpress.com/

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 12:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I feel sorry for Sally Quinn. She must tear down Governor Palin to build herself and her little blog (one of a million) up. Yay! You have a blog! Congratulations. Your argument that Palin is unqualified because she is exactly as qualified as Obama, makes no sense. Obama is running for PRESIDENT, and has never ran a thing. Palin has been a Governor, a Mayor, a Commissioner... Name ONE accomplishment of Mr. Obama? And would you say a father was absentee if his daughter got pregnant? You're sexist. And you're ugly, inside and out. You are pathetic.

Posted by: Sally Quinn is bitter and sad | September 2, 2008 12:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

You are tring to set back the rights of women tp an early 1900's mindset. This is very disturbing to read a woman of all people spreading such rubbish. Sarah Palin appears to be a very capable person and you seem to have left her husband's role in the marriage out (intentionally?)

What are you trying to say? She is not qualified because she is a mother? Shame on you and your leftist liberal hugging newspaper.

Move into the 21st century!

Posted by: Michelle Swinson | September 2, 2008 12:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You obviously hate conservative philosophy as much as you hate President Bush. And this from the party of "love". You are just as terrified of Sara Palin as the rest of your pathetic, hateful crowd. Of course, McCain made his pick to win the election! Do you expect him to pick a condidate to lose? You liberals never cease to amaze me. By the way, Sara has more executive experience than your two candidates combined, (oh I know, her experience is in fly over country, so it doesn't count). You liberals are really a bunch to be pitied, and not just because you are facing four more years of Republican rule!

Posted by: Phil | September 2, 2008 12:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

From your letter one can conclude that we socially progressive liberals should discourage our daughters from pursuing careers that include opportunities for leadership responsibility until they can devote all of their energies in that domain. As parents if we encourage her to be in a position in which she would have to chose between professional demands and those “enormous distractions” (children and family) then somehow we will have unethically or unpatriotically shortchanged the nation.

I’m sorry my daughter can be a rising corporate executive and a mother of young children. She can be a whole person of her own design, a gifted-professional, family-oriented woman. Her mother and I have told her that all of her life!

Posted by: Paul Loeffler | September 2, 2008 12:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Population of Alaska: 670,053

Good choice McCain, rape ANWR for oil starting on day 1.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

1) "John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman..." This is a shallow assessment. If McCain chose Lieberman would you say "John McCain chose a running mate simply because he is Jewish..."?
2) I do not think that Geraldine Ferraro was chosen simply because she is a woman. This belittles her as well.
3) I find it further insulting to make sexist arguments in regards to her raising her children with the demands of the job of VP. Last I checked, she has a husband too. Furthermore, why don't we also ask Obama how he is going to care for his daughters? Why is this simply a question posed to women?
4) I somehow doubt that your being chosen to be on network TV at 32 is a similar comparison to Gov. Palin being chosen as a running mate and possible VP, other then the shallow assumption that you both were chosen simply because your women.
5) As for the foreign policy experience, wasn't that argument made when then governor Bill Clinton was running for president? I doubt you would say he failed.
6) If you say that a mother's role is different then a father's then you would also be against gay parents (two fathers) raising children?

It is sad that this article is filled with so many contradictions.

Posted by: Dad_In_CT | September 2, 2008 12:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How does this shock, anger and left wing venom find its way to a column on religion and faith? Desperation.

Posted by: Glenn | September 2, 2008 12:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I hope Gov. Palin changes her position as it clear now that ABSTINENCE ONLY does not work. If you can not handle your own house, how the heck are you going to take care of the nation.

I do not understand that why media is afraid to talk about this issue. If she had committed crime, she would be tried as an adult....for pete's sake she is 17. Let's just say as it is: as a mother PALIN FAILED!

Posted by: JSG | September 2, 2008 12:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Let me make sure I understand your points.

Gender issues are important, but picking a woman running mate is a cynical choice.

Women can have careers and be good mothers, but this one can't, or in your view, shouldn't.

How can you be so sure that Sarah Palin is not prepared for the criticism? What do you think will happen? She'll cry?

Give us a break, Sally.

Posted by: Oprah | September 2, 2008 12:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally this was so well written!

I agree on so many levels!

We are not going to vote for any random skirt just to say there is a woman in a position of power. It has to be for the right reasons and I truly feel that Palin stands for no women's rights what so ever...so why would women of the country vote to set themselves back several decades?

Thank you so much for writing this!

-Amy

Posted by: Amy | September 2, 2008 12:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Are you telling us you didn't know that so-called "family values voters" are hypocrites? Just watch as they now bend over backwards to find ways to explain the daughter's pregnancy as a wonderful example for our children to follow.

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008 12:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

This article is below you. For you to assume cynicism in John McCain and be THE reporter responsible for the Washington Post's "on faith" pages is...well...the height of cynicism and the opposite of faith. Your eligibility for leading these pages, just zeroed out. I'm genuinely surprised to get this from you. Shocked in fact. Such cynicism should not be so blatant and unrepentant in the head of the "on faith" pages. You should take a time out and get your head right again.

Jonathan

Posted by: Jonathan Switzer | September 2, 2008 12:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment


commenters, readers, get up, keep manners, calm down, be seated, make up your mind.

Posted by: sthumblewidecircle | September 2, 2008 12:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What this article does show, among other things, that Ms. Quinn is not able to get through her prejudices about Evangelical Christians. This blind spot is particularly disappointing for a person who writes about faith.

As to the political ravings its enough to say that had Sen. Obama picked someone like Gov. Palin Ms. Quinn would be leading the charge for the strong woman who can multi-task and bring a new perspective to Washington politics. One of the greatest fears of the pampered feminist chattering class is that someone outside of their cliques may obtain power and when that happens out come the claws.

Posted by: John the Fierce | September 2, 2008 12:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

jon meacham and sally quinn have a "love child", that was aborted in 2000.

Posted by: dan | September 2, 2008 12:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's obvious from all the liberal bleating that this was a brilliant move by McCain. All you have is no experience? Obama has no experience, unless the five years he spent reading Karl Marx somehow counts as experience.

Posted by: Steven Raye | September 2, 2008 12:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Although I would never have voted for Hillary Clinton. We are at polar opposites on most things. I admire her abilites and strength.

It seems Liberals cannot abide a woman black or white or a black man that does not believe exactly as they do. i.e. Condaleeza Rice, Clarence Thomas, Sarah Palin, etc.

You and several other columninst and reporters seem to be close to hysteria.

Are you all really that scard of Sarah Palin?

Posted by: rusino | September 2, 2008 12:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You say "But is she ready to be president?"

Why the double standard. She has more executive experience than Obama and he's at the top of the Democrat's ticket!

Rather than reading yet another article parroting the party line talking points I would like to see you do a point by point comparison of Barack's "community organizer" and Senate experience with Palin's Conservation Commission and Governorship credentials.

I think it stretches credulity when the Obama campaign tries to tout his recent European trip as foreign diplomatic experience and he himself points to his own presidential campaign as his only "executive" experience.

Palin may not be perfect but her "lack" of experience is a red herring used by people who can't or won't argue the merits of her policy positions and theory of government.

I'll wager that most Americans will see her positions and judgment as more mainstream than either Biden or Obama's.

After all, she didn't spend the last 10-20 years hanging out with Bill Ayer's and attending Jeremiah Wright's church!

Posted by: Robert | September 2, 2008 12:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If this woman were a lib she would already be coronated by the MSM. They are flummoxed by this brilliant pick. They can't pick on her lack of experience without pointing out that she has more of it than their Messiah. If a man had written this article about a lib, he would be pilloried as a sexist of the worst stripe. The first woman veep will be a conservative Republican! Ooh, that's gotta sting! You think they hate her now, wait until she serves her two terms as President! Go get 'em Sarah!

Posted by: Rickard | September 2, 2008 12:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Where was your concern when John Edward's wife was stricken with cancer early in the campaign? What would happen if Edwards was "distracted" by his terminally ill wife or worse, she died and he would be a single-parent taking care of his children in the white house?

Posted by: UAMatt89 | September 2, 2008 12:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The biggest problem is that the Annie Oakley pro life but ok to kill animals .
Is is a perfect fool for the special interest including the gun and
military Industrial Complex to control and Jew lobby whom runs our GOP state Dept...

If fact this special interest group whom control the GOP may want to poison McCain so their complete fool can be controlled and do their biding . just as in the Middle ages when the son or daughter came to power they were controlled by the evil insiders.

McCain and his VP are really enemies of we the people and champions of the greedy special interest groups.,

As pay back we the people should demand that the Democratic
congress sells back Alaska to Russia to reduce our National debt
that the GOP has gave to our children and grand children.


Warren Parr
Killeen Tx

Posted by: Sally missed the biggest Problem with Annie Oakley | September 2, 2008 12:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Plain and simple Ms. Quinn... you are bitter.

Posted by: Man Coulter | September 2, 2008 12:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Would you really be saying all of this about a man who was going to be nominated for VP?

"Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months."

I doubt it. You are a sexist.

Posted by: lslkaahuna | September 2, 2008 12:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just wondering when the angry harsh outrage column will come from you, regarding the insulting nomination of an unqualified, inexperienced black man simply designed to play on everyone's feelings and force-fed guilt....?

Oh and while you're at it, why not try a column where you compare Palin and Obama side by side...maybe compare the church she has gone to, with the church he went to...or the religious teachings both have listened to over the years...

Pathetic, angry, misguided, and sad...that is where you reside.

Posted by: Cala | September 2, 2008 12:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Such a predictable comment from a "Washington Insider". I think it's time we elected leaders who want to serve instead of career politicians.

Posted by: Jack Cassell | September 2, 2008 12:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find your whole premise sexist. Her husband is a stay-at-home-dad so that should answer every "concern" you have. You just don't agree with her political stances, so why don't you argue about them? If she were a man you would never even worry about these family issues. If a first term male governor were chosen you would not question his experience, just as you don't question Obama the first term senator with no executive experience who is at the top of his ticket.

Posted by: Mandy | September 2, 2008 12:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

By the way, Sally, did your daughter ever mention that I nailed her back in 1982... without protection? Martha's still quite the dish.

Cynical choice by McCain? Doubtful. You just sound terrified that a QUALIFIED woman isn't a far left moonbat.

Posted by: Simon LeBon | September 2, 2008 12:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn, leading the way to the demise of the American newspaper.

Posted by: Beetle Bailey | September 2, 2008 12:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I have read the peice you have written about Sarha Palin. Madam , I beg to differ with you. I am a 72 year old woman and I wish her daughter were not with child but she is and I am so very glad that this lovely family are standing by thier daughter.I only hope that if this had happen to your son you would have done the same.

Posted by: Mary L. King | September 2, 2008 12:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The conservatives are like ostriches, burying their heads in the sand. Their double messages of abstinence only and the hell with contraception and abortion not only undermine the health of the nation but aggravate the increasing maladies of the middle class. It is easy to "support" a teenage pregnant daughter when you are wealthy or ,as in the case of Palin, in the upper crust of the middle class, but when you are a blue collar worker, barely making it day to day the "options" and opportunities get increasingly skewed with any "mistake" or "miscalculation" that happens within the family. Republicans are truly a disconnected crowd. Like Obama said in his speech, is not that they don't care, they just don't get it!!! OBAMA 089

Posted by: SISL | September 2, 2008 12:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You can actually hear the liberal heads popping over Sarah Palin. So too with this Wapo writer who is looking capitalize off the liberal election train derailment. Good luck. Hahaha

Posted by: schratboy | September 2, 2008 12:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Time to pick on the chick!

Posted by: Hutch | September 2, 2008 12:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The more I read the establishment pundits like Ms Quinn...who must dredge up any kind of spin to try to demean a Republican ..even if it is a women, the more amused I am. What a double standard!!...and how bankrupt can you become???? What outrage if some critic would dare question a Democrat women holding office because she has children and may not be able to preform her duties!!!... for shame!!! Pure sexism!!!!

I draw comfort that Ms. Quinn and her ilk are really writing columns for their own amusement..surely no reads them and if they do, no one can take them seriously.

Posted by: Larry Bruch | September 2, 2008 12:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I find Ms. Palin a wonderfully refreshing choice. Not just because she's not a lawyer, but just that she's a very down to earth individual with obvious leadership skills.

I was born and raised in NY, moved to TX about a year ago and have worked in/with major corporations my whole career. For anyone, especially a woman, to not just take on but beat both the political establishment in Alaska and Big Oil, is one tough person.

I can only hope to McCain is man enough to break the mold of what a VP does in Washington and let's Palin kick some ass.

Registered independent voter, my last vote for a Presidential candidate (I vote in all elections) was Perot in '92. You news folks are missing the real story here. It's not the female voter Palin is attracting, it's the Perot independents. When you add them to the Republican base, McCain wins easily.

Posted by: steve | September 2, 2008 12:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn, you've successfully listed all of the most obvious critiques of Palin's selection.

Congratulations.

Posted by: Thanks for nothing | September 2, 2008 12:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think the way they are dealing with the daughter pregnancy is totally in line with good family values. We all make mistakes, it's how we deal with them...it seems like the family is sticking together, and not hiding it. All of this reminds me of the "Cheney's daughter is gay" routine Kerry/Edwards try to pull. It'll be just as effective (not at all).

Posted by: Neil SHeep | September 2, 2008 12:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Mrs. Quinn
You are an elegant, eloquent, spiteful loser.

Posted by: jw | September 2, 2008 12:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Time to pick on the chick!

Posted by: Hutch | September 2, 2008 12:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is an excellent and even-handed discussion of the Palin nomination. I agree that she is woefully unprepared for the job of national candidate, let alone vice president should the McCain/Palin ticket happen to catch lightening and win. She herself should have shied at the offer to join McCain as she better than anyone else knows how unprepared she is. That she accepted with alacrity is a damning indictment of her judgment. While I greatly appreciate John McCain's courage and service to America, this nomination is nothing more than a cold calculation designed to help him achieve victory, not to provide the leadership Washington so desperately needs.

Posted by: Paul Bloustein | September 2, 2008 12:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So far, Sally, it's been people like you on the left who have been "judgmental" and the "faith & values" folks who have been mature about things that happen in many families, recognizing, too, that it isn't relevant to the matter at hand.

You say McCain's choice was "cynical". Obama's choice of Biden wasn't? They had to spin a fantasy about him being "working class" and interested in the economy. Of course, the media bought it and advanced it. Palin, on the other hand, brings the real thing: working class, small business, union, proven reformist guts. So, who's being "cynical"?

It is refreshing, however, to see your acknowledgment, however late, that "a mother's role is different from a father's". Maybe women applying for jobs should be asked about how many children they have? Oh wait, that battle was fought 35 years ago and you were on the other side.

Posted by: deerhurst | September 2, 2008 12:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

anyone who is not a washington insider and elitist is a good candidate. we are sick of washington types

Posted by: mur | September 2, 2008 12:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So, Ms. Quinn says that mothers' roles are different than fathers' but criticizes church leaders who recognize that same fact. Like most self-involved liberals this story has to be about her and her experience as if no other possibilities exist. Since she probably knows no "evangelical women" she wrongly assumes that they would look down on Sarah Palin for working outside the home. Ms. Quinn looks at the world and judges other women through the myopic lens of her personal experience and surroundings - like the snobby rich woman years ago who exclaimed her amazement at Richard Nixon's victory because no one she knew voted for him.

Posted by: BKB | September 2, 2008 12:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama is an empty suit. Palin has more experience and more accomplishments than Obama. There is not a single thing you can find that attests to Obama's "experience".How he bacame the Dem nominee is unbelieveable.After a few years in the Senate,if he ran for and was elected Gov of IL and then ran for the presidentcy, he would have some basis on which to run. But as it is, he has, in my opinion, none.

Posted by: bob | September 2, 2008 12:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How odd that the media cognescenti who are so eager to turn the Oval Office over to the ex-community organizer who writes biographical tributes to himself are offended that the Governor of a state has been tapped by McCain for the VP slot. Actually, its not so odd, its only more evidence of how foolish and disgusting the so called fourth estate has become here

Posted by: Norman | September 2, 2008 12:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

That is a very well written article. I just don't get how McCain came to this conclusion. It is almost like he is purposely screwing the GOP (perhaps this is payback??) for how they have treated him?

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008 12:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hypocrite, hypocrite, hypocrite. Sally Quinn is a hypocrite.

Why would having children preclude a woman from being the Vice President, but it doesn't preclude a man from being President? This is what feminists/reporters/liberal media people like Quinn don't understand.

Fathers are parents too, and Palin should'nt have to stoop to answering questions over whether she can "juggle being a mother and an elected official."

Posted by: Jorge Wesa | September 2, 2008 12:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"She and the father of the child plan to marry. This may be a hard one for the Republican conservative family-values crowd to swallow."

So, Sally, what is your impression of what the "family-values crowd" would want to occur at this point in time? She is keeping the baby and getting married. Both actions seem completly in line with family values. Having an abortion and living in sin, in contrast, would seem like actions to take issue with.

At this point in time, debating whether or not she should have gotten pregnant seems useless.

Posted by: Todd | September 2, 2008 12:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hypocrite, hypocrite, hypocrite. Sally Quinn is a hypocrite.

Why would having children preclude a woman from being the Vice President, but it doesn't preclude a man from being President? This is what feminists/reporters/liberal media people like Quinn don't understand.

Fathers are parents too, and Palin should have to stoop to answering questions over whether she can "juggle being a mother and an elected official."

Posted by: Jorge Wesa | September 2, 2008 12:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Mrs. Palin is just too American for the Washington Post. She is a real person, with a real life.

You attack a defenseless 17 year old girl. You eagerly destroy her life so as to advance a minor advantage for your candidate.

Posted by: Mark Baker | September 2, 2008 12:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

you can't have it both ways-'a mothers's role is different than a father's"-and imply that a woman's vocational role should take a back-seat to her children-why haven't you ever said that about any president we've had who had a number of children of HIS own--double speak double standard feminism from someone i had respected

Posted by: bill fritz | September 2, 2008 12:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a Hillary supporter and lifelong independent female, you have it all wrong. This women will be a breath of fresh air to Washington. Based on my analysis, she has more real experience that matters to the vast majority of Americans than that self-indulgent Harvard elite that managed to back in to the the democrat ticket. Between Obama and Biden, they can just keep patting themselves on the back, I think the American people see right through Obama.

Posted by: Jane | September 2, 2008 12:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Did you write that all by yourself Sally? You must be so proud of yourself. How many male editors did it take to make it readable?

Posted by: Erik | September 2, 2008 12:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Despots almost always invoke the name of God. Read some of "you know who's" speeches in Germany and you will clearly see that God was on his side.

Posted by: sanity | September 2, 2008 12:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The fact that the loony left does not like Palin
IS A GOOD THING.

I would not vote for the republicans if he had picked Hillary as his VP.

Posted by: Fred | September 2, 2008 12:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn: SHE'S A WOMAN BUT SHE'S A CONSERVATIVE. AND -- GASP!!! -- HER DAUGHTER IS PREGNANT!!! SHE ISN'T A GOOD MOTHER!

What a hypocrite, Quinn -- maybe she should be more like you, humping her way to the top by chasing the boss. THAT'S HOW A REAL WOMAN MAKES A CAREER.

Posted by: Carleton | September 2, 2008 12:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
I'm not sure if your understanding of Christianity in america is really this inadequate, or if you're simply so blinded by your own political bent that you can't think clearly right now.

Here's a quick lesson in basic Christianity: Christians aren't perfect. They make the same mistakes others do - in fact their faith is entirely premised on the assumption that they will occasionally disappoint themselves and God.

As much as you would like it to be true, the slips and falls of Christians do not weaken their message or make them less admirable in the eyes of average people. The situation with Gov. Palin's daughter, which elitists like yourself see as credibility-destroying hypocrisy, Christians and traditional-values americans see as a microcosm of our Christian condition - and we respect her all the more for the struggle and for the determination to do what's right.

You might consider skipping your next feminist book club meeting and picking up a Bible or poking your head into a church service. You'll find that the rest of us simple people outside the beltway aren't nearly as two-dimensional as you'd hoped.


Posted by: Julie | September 2, 2008 12:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You are clearly putting your hat on Sarah's Palin's head. Your failure as a News Anchor at age 32 is not a rational argument for comparison. It is always interesting to read how journalists spin the story toward their own agenda. How many women have the grit and tenacity that Sarah Palin has demonstrated? You assume her family is perhaps like yours, and will not have the family assistance she needs with family issues as they arrive to handle their child. Do you know how Bristol's fiance's family will interact with their grandchild? Probably not.
The mass media hysteria over Sarah Palin has to do with how threatened Democrats feel over the selection of a woman who has fought the Republican establishment in Alaska - and won. She battled for ethic reform and won. She clearly is a winner. It is revealing that you did not mention this. Instead you mentioned yourself and chose to focus on the minutiae regarding the size of her family. You interjected your interpretation of how she should manage her family. The Palin family issues present fairly commonplace problems currently facing many families. So typical of Washington Post reportage. FYI: conservatives rejoice in conserving life - not killing life. We see solutions, your report emphasizes problems.

Posted by: Judith Eytel | September 2, 2008 12:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm anxious to hear Sarah come out on a national stage and voice her opinions about abortion. You know, all about how she feels women who are victims of rape and incest should be forced to carry and give birth to her attackers child.

This is not only an issue for women to consider. All you men out there I see posting in support of Sarah need to ask yourself how hip you would be on her if you found out that your wife had been raped and is now pregnant and there was nothing at all you could do about it but raise the rapist's baby.

Posted by: John D | September 2, 2008 12:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Substance vs. platitudes - that is defining difference between McCain and Palin vs. Obama. Sara comes across as a real person, not a political automaton. Her story and character will resonate with many in this country who are tired of the insulting, content free platitudes of Barack Obama and many other politicians on both sides.

Posted by: Ed Jones | September 2, 2008 12:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally you and yours are really afraid of the political clout of this woman. You are not afraid of her qualifications. This is but cover for your hit piece. "Maybe this will work." Indeed.

Posted by: oldted | September 2, 2008 12:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,

The Daily KOS just called.
Said your column was great!
Just like you promised.

Posted by: Captain Hook | September 2, 2008 12:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Despots almost always invoke the name of God. Read some of "you know who's" speeches in Germany and you will clearly see that God was on his side.

Posted by: sanity | September 2, 2008 12:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn wrote, "From what little we know about her, she seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person. She certainly has been successful in her 44 years. But is she ready to be president?" Gosh, that sounds an awful lot like, "From what little we know about him, he seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person. He certainly has been successful in his 40+ years. But is he ready to be president?"

Sally Quinn finds it impossible for a spouse to both "... respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation..." and to be Vice-President (or President.) I see no inherent conflict, but I guess Sally Q is less liberated than she thinks.

Sally Quinn wrote, "These are dangerous and trying times for the entire world. This is no time to to play gender politics. The stakes are too high." So Sally doesn't think a woman is capable of being a capable Vice-President or President - now I KNOW Sally is less liberated than she thinks!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

O.M Gray ... Your post is almost too stupid for a response, but I'll respond anyway. You say that she obviously didn't know what her daughter was doing? And who does? Do you expect her to be at her side 24 hours a day? It's called freedom and trust. Just because her daughter made a bad choice, doesn't mean that she is a bad person or that her mother is a bad mother. You think that because her daughter is pregnant that her mother didn't honestly try to teach her abstinence? That is ridiculous! Do you think that people who smoke were never told that they shouldn't smoke? That it is bad for them? Have you applied everything that you were taught in school or in church in your life without making mistakes or failing? Before pointing your finger at her, take a look at yourself in the mirror. Then take a look at Obama, his girls aren't old enough to make these kinds of mistakes yet, but if they do will you throw him under the bus? Obama himself has said that if his daughters make a mistake he doesn't want them to be punished with a child. Is that the kind of president you want? One who considers a child a punishment? Think about it.

Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2008 12:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am amazed on a daily basis how the Palin pick has exposed the hypocrisy of the left. The same group that espoused the freedom for females to have careers and motherhood are now questioning how Sarah Palin can be a good mother and a career-seeking female. And how can Sally Quinn know what reasons McCain used to make his choice? It is really fascinating how the left is trying anything and everything to besmirch only the second woman to be considered for the Executive branch. Lets judge her on the facts, shall we?

Posted by: John C | September 2, 2008 12:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother."

It's good to check in with the ignorant every now and again to see what their views are. I guess that Sarah Palin should have chained her daughter in the basement. Would that be "hands-on" enough for Ms. Quinn?

If Palin's daughter had had an abortion, the liberals would probably be falling over themselves to congratulate her on doing the right thing. What a bunch of phony hypocrites.

Posted by: Mr. Brucas Lice | September 2, 2008 12:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a "conservative" I find it funny when clearly liberal writers try and state how I feel about a candidate. You have no clue what family-value voters will think of Sarah Palin. It shows how out of touch liberal elitest in the media are with most Americans. Sarah Palin was a brilliant choice and has turned a sure victory for Obama into a likely defeat. Keep attacking her, you will only push more voters to our side. This may be the issue that finally shows all of America how extreme the far left has become. This is the start of another Reagan Revolution.

Posted by: Steve LaRocque | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh it is so obvious that you Ms. Quinn, are a bitter and jealous woman of this magnificent pick by the Maverick! Yes, all you liberal "feminists" jokes are showing your true colors that you're not actually for women in high places - just radical liberal left-leaning, abortion-loving types! Oh the jealousy is just spewing against Governor Palin's tenacity, brains, strength and courage, beauty, values, etc. You, on the other hand, are a bitter, old, nobody elitist, (who can't stand the fact that you need Botox every month) and are again, on the losing side of the ticket. That's ok Sally, keep it up, you and the others look like the jealous, pathetic, idiots that you are. GOD forgive me, but that felt so good!

Posted by: susan donaldson | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Let me get this straight.... Liberals believe it's okay for the Massachusetts senator to murder the woman he's having an affair with. A Democratic President can commit rape and have an affair with his intern. But, a Republican Vice Presidential candidate cannot have a daughter who is pregnant out of wedlock. Sounds like close-minded liberalism at its best.

Posted by: Gary | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you are obviously a staunch democrat and wouldn't approve of any women on a Republican ticket. As such, how could one find validity in any of your comments? As to the experience of Palin vs Obama - she has sat in the executive chair more than once, Obama is just a lawyer turned "rock star" with virtually no experience except running a campaign. Even rock bands can successfully run a tour that involve thousands of people and millions of dollars - that does not qualify them to run the country, nor would anyone consider voting for them to do so.

Posted by: aconder | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"I didn't even want the job, but I didn't feel I could turn it down. Of course it was a disaster."

So is this one.

Posted by: Nadelstich | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh it is so obvious that you Ms. Quinn, are a bitter and jealous woman of this magnificent pick by the Maverick! Yes, all you liberal "feminists" jokes are showing your true colors that you're not actually for women in high places - just radical liberal left-leaning, abortion-loving types! Oh the jealousy is just spewing against Governor Palin's tenacity, brains, strength and courage, beauty, values, etc. You, on the other hand, are a bitter, old, nobody elitist, (who can't stand the fact that you need Botox every month) and are again, on the losing side of the ticket. That's ok Sally, keep it up, you and the others look like the jealous, pathetic, idiots that you are. GOD forgive me, but that felt so good!

Posted by: susan donaldson | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

At we know stupid people still work for the Washington Post.

John McCain would be doomed no matter who he picked, so what's the point of writing the article in the first place?

Posted by: Jeff | September 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Assuming that the pick was only about you and getting the disgruntled female vote because Hillary didn't win, is incredibly egotistical. It's not all about you. He picked one of the few people who are actually gaining governing experience daily...a state governor. And he picked the most popular one. A governor who stood up to her own party, the 'old white guys' as some would call them. A feminist icon in-the-making if she were a liberal, no doubt. But since she's a conservative, well then she's just a ploy by the right to woo disillusioned female voters. She shares McCain's values and views of government, she's been both a mayor and a governor, taken on the oil industry and her own party, is tremendously popular...gosh, I can see why she'd be an insult to women everywhere! Give me a break!

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,
In your next column could you list ALL of O'Bama's actual accomplishes in some kind of detail? It may take a long time to research it, but it shouldn't be too long of a list.

Posted by: Heywood Jablome | September 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I whole wholeheartedly agree. His choice of Palin was in the best interest of himself, not the country. I was undecided yet jubilant when Barack chose Biden, a decision that would ensure he was backed up by one of the most qualified men in the senate. John McCain lost my vote when he picked Palin, and I hope the vote of many others.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You would not be saying this if Obama had put a woman on his ticket with similar qualifications. You can make a good argument that Palin has better experience and is more qualified than Obama. In a way you are making a good argument for voting for McCain over an inexperienced Obama.

Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's over .. the dems are sinking and I see the bubbles... cheers from texas

Posted by: Rhonda T. | September 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

A very big problem in this country is the media, the press. They are a 5th column that abuses the 1st Amendment right of a free press in order to undermine the nation. Something needs to be done about the media and soon!

Posted by: Thomas Shea | September 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

didnt sally quinn "succeed" in journalism by sleeping with that zombie ben bradlee?

Posted by: indyvoter | September 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So Barrack is qualified to be number one but Sarah isn't qualified enough to be number two. She has been in elected office longer than Barrack, But the real reason a Woman such as yourself is against her is on demand abortion. Just be honest.

Posted by: Robert Adair | September 2, 2008 12:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

So the only women that can run for office is Hill ....

Posted by: david | September 2, 2008 12:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I predict that quotes from Ms. Quinn's hit piece will soon be appearing in McCain/Palin campaign materials and will convince millions of voters, denied the ethereal heights inhabited by Ms Quinn, to vote McCain/Palin this Fall. You go girl!

Posted by: David Cavanagh | September 2, 2008 12:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Me thinks you sound a bit worried.... A real person gets nominated - not a Washington gasbag - and you freak out. Making an issue of the daughter is over-the-top.

Do you actually believe that Christians would throw a young woman "under the bus" because of bad judgement. You will be surprised to see the community support the mother, unborn child and the grandmother - and wonder what world they live in. The question is what world do you live in?

Posted by: Bill Z | September 2, 2008 12:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It angers me to read opinions like yours that are so out of touch. By questioning whether Gov. Palin will "have enough time" to take care of her children, you are doing what the establishment has been doing to women for years, taking them off the same playing field as men.

Shame on you, especially since you yourself are a woman.

Please name one male President or Presidential candidate whose ability to take care of their children if elected was ever brought into question. Don't waste your time, becasue there's not one.

It is also ludicrous to insinuate that Gov. Palin is somehow not the correct choice as John McCain's running mate because her 17-yr old daughter is pregnant. How reactionary and shortsighted of you. You barely place yourself above the liberal blogsophere with that line of thought. Even the teenagers of wonderful and responsible parents get pregnant. You were a teenager once weren't you? Did you ever do anything that your parents warned you against doing for fear of the repercussions? You don't need to answer that one either.

The simple fact is that Gov. Sarah Palin is an eloquent, educated, articulat, experienced, strong conservative woman who has a strong set of values and lives her life by them. She wasn't picked just because she's a woman, she wasn't picked just because of her tradional conservative values, she wasn't picked just because she's a Washington outsider.

She was picked because when you combine all of those qualities, she becomes the most qualified PERSON for the job.

If McCain/Palin win it won't be for the wrong reasons, it will be because a majority of Americans believed they were the right people to lead our country.....nothing more, nothing less.

Posted by: Keith | September 2, 2008 12:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn - there is no chance in Hell that you would vote for a Republican ticket anyway, so please get off of it. And please don't assume that, because someone has high moral values, that they can 24/7 control what a 17-year old daughter does with her boyfriend. I would rather elect someone with good moral values than someone who thinks their morals are "whatever feels good".

Posted by: Tony - Kansas City | September 2, 2008 12:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, slow down dear your SPINNING totally out of control!

The contortions you can go to obviously got you your job!

Literally and figuratively

Posted by: Amazed | September 2, 2008 12:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself. I will never again read an article written by you, and will urge others to do the same.
You should apologize to Gov. Palin, and to working mothers everywhere for your comments.

Posted by: Josh | September 2, 2008 12:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"A mother's role is different from a father's."

Don't know, that sounds awful sexist to me. If a man made that statement, the feminists (including yourself) would be all over him

Posted by: edf | September 2, 2008 12:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

While I applaud Mccain's attempt to select someone from outside the "white country-club establishment", it is a fact he is 72, has fought and beat cancer, and ANY VP choice should be absolutely qualified to take over as president at any time. In Palin, he failed to provide the voters with this qualification. It appears to me that he was trying a "political ploy"....playing to Mrs. Clinton's supporters.

Posted by: kevin d. | September 2, 2008 12:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your claim that McCain made a pick that failed to appeal to you, is absurd John McCain picked Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska and mother of five, to be his running mate to woo women like you? That kind of Twilight Zone expectation is utterly vapid. Ms Quinn, do you really think you are some archetypical or representative woman? Sorry 'Missy' but a Cynical, Collectivist, 'uber alles' Liberal like yourself is hardly disposed to give a fair hearing to any selection by McCain. As a traditional everyday pedestrian American, I take great comfort in the piquish scorn you & the rest of the Socialist Left have shown this accomplished mother of five. Please continue to spew. I promise Sally, America is 'listening'...

Posted by: Angel R. | September 2, 2008 12:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

uh Does anyone think that Hillary Clinton would be a consideration for Prez if she wasn't Bill's wife?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 12:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

OH PLEASE! YOU WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ACCEPTING OF ANYONE JOHN MCCAIN CHOSE. LOOK AT THE FACTS: PALIN HAS BEEN IN ELECTED OFFICE LONGER THAN BARACK OBAMA. SHE HAS SHOWN A CLEARLY INDEPENDENT STREAK. AND, SHE HAS TAKEN ON CORRUPTION.

IF YOU APPLIED THE SAME LITMUS TEST TO OBAMA, THEN YOU COULD NOT SUPPORT HIM. SO, PLEASE CALL THIS WHAT IT IS: JUST ANOTHER BLOG FROM A LIBERALLY BIASED JOURNALIST.

Posted by: Free2Speak | September 2, 2008 12:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil. Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well."

So right you are Sally. It is much too risky to ever have a woman on the ticket. They should stay home and keep the homefires burning while the men handle the problems of the world. Women have too much family baggage to contend with while men have none of those responsibilities.

RIGHT?

Posted by: Fred | September 2, 2008 12:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How does Sally Quinn know if Sarah Palin is ready for the scrutiny and criticism of being in the White House? Does she know what Ms. Palin has lived through in her life? Does she know what Ms. Palin deals with on a daily basis?

This article is an insult to American women who are highly successful CEO's with children they have been raising throughout their entire careers. In addition, it is an insult to women with special needs children who are CEO's and women who have learned to balance their families and businesses. More and more women have outside help to work with their kids. This article is even more an insult to Sarah's husband. More and more, fathers play a larger role in their children's lives and in raising their children. This article insults the contemporary American father who takes a bigger role in his children's lives than those in the past.

The comments that Palin is not ready to be a leader of the free world is an insult to the American intelligence. What I see in this article is fear of women in America and what they really believe.

In addition, remember the Bush twin daughters? They were typical teenage girls and the press tried to bring disgrace on the family by blowing the girls actions out of proportion. This article is truly another example of the American press' love for putting their personal views on the public or in many cases just trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill.

Salle Quinn has no conceivable idea of what "evangelical Christian" women or families think or believe. I am one of these women and I am considered a successful woman business owner and leader. I have worked with women across the country who are successful women entrepreneurs who have strong faith-based values and are mothers. They have learned to balance family and running a major business. Ms. Quinn's article is trying to demonize Christian women and their lives and way of thinking. It is also an attack on any woman who has strong faith-based beliefs including Jews and Muslims. Most importantly Sally Quinn's article shows me she does not know or understand the strength of women leaders who are CEO's of businesses and corporations and are also mothers and wives. They began their successful lives while their children were younger than Sarah Palin's children. In closing, this article shows me that there are people in the United States who literally have no idea what evangelical Christian women and men believe. It also shows me the writer has no idea what Jewish and Muslim women leaders consider important. I wonder what the late, great Mrs. Bhutto would say to Sally Quinn's article.

Quoting the statement from a Southern Baptist convention has no relevancy in this article. It shows me that Sally Quinn has never learned what the Christians believe nor what the Biblical teachings mean. If you are going to look at Christian beliefs, then get an accurate interpretation of the Biblical context. That statement from the Southern Baptist convention has nothing to do with Sarah Palin being Vice President of the United States. It has to do with the relationship with her husband and what the husband and wife determine is right for their family. Nothing in that statement says women cannot be leaders outside the home. It is dealing specifically with the relationship between the husband and wife. The Washington Post needs to be concerned about its writers expressing "truth" rather than "distortion of the truth" or in this case-using statements they don't understand since they have probably never studied the Bible with a Christian nor even know the true meaning of Christianity.

Posted by: Sylvia Scott | September 2, 2008 12:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Really, Ms. Quinn. You should be embarrassed of this column.

Posted by: kj | September 2, 2008 12:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The writer is wrong on just about all levels. Not even worth getting into it.

Posted by: good grief | September 2, 2008 12:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh ... and how dare you accuse her of not being a hands on mother just because her daughter is pregnant! A mother can only do so much, but when it comes down to it, a child will do what they feel like doing in the spur of the moment. You are out of touch with America. My sister had a child out of wedlock and she was married to the father and now they are a very happy couple who has been married for nearly 8 years with 3 children. She is a wonderful mother partly because of the "hands on" mothering that she received from her, and my, wonderful mother. Get a clue and stop trying to make a story where there is none.

Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2008 12:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Lets look at this from the insider position within the dem party. Obama made a speech! Now to Obamas' credit he negotiated the Chicago underworld without receiving charges. He managed to spend nearly twenty years listening to a racist preacher without absorbing a word said! He honestly believes friendship with Ayers is a good thing. He endorses the communist viewpoint. Hope and Change is his dream, to late MLK beat him to that. Living in a dream world is not an asset. He has managed to use his time as a senator mostly to run for president. Not fair to his constituents but hey you need to look after yourself, I get that. He wants to help underpriviledged but his own family lives in an out house in Nairobi. It could be he didn't know of this brothers existence, but he does now, and my guess the guy lives in the same outhouse. Says a lot about the family of Americans. Oh!wait Obama and his wife struggled to pay off education related bills instead of sending him a dollar a month to double his income. I guess there is only so much that can be done at 4 million a year. Give me a break. Someone give me a substantive reason to consider Obama for president. One just One.

Posted by: donald cantrell | September 2, 2008 12:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I see, I guess you would prefer a socialist-leaning, less qualified PRESIDENTIAL candidate, to a qualified conservative VICE presidential candidate, woman or not? Sally Quinn-TRUE Conservative?? More like a sell out. tsk tsk

Posted by: Shawna | September 2, 2008 12:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother."

I believe Jesus very carefully taught us, to paraphrase, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." What is enough? Who is the judge? Do you not understand divine providence? That's just plain silly, but hey, nobody's perfect? Thank God there will be a new life in this world, that her daughter chose life over....It's a blessing, I wish everyone would be as accountable for their actions..... As in Clinton's famous "I did not have sex with that woman." O you crack me up!

Any inclination I had of engaging in a serious consideration of Obama has been totally wiped out by the actions of the Democratic Party. Shame on you.

Posted by: JL | September 2, 2008 12:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How we always talk... "talk", about finding responsible people in government.

Governor Sarah Palin is clearly an honest broker for people who want responsible government, and I want you to know how much I support this woman, and wish her luck in her becoming the first woman Vice President.

You say nothing of Obama, someone who has half the experience this woman has, and they're running for completely different jobs.

I hope my statement is one, of what I believe will be thousands, against your point of view.

Posted by: I Support Sarah | September 2, 2008 12:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Gov. Pallin's qualifications -- or lack thereof -- to be vice president are not the key issue. Lost in all the finger wagging is her 17-year-old daughter, who will have to go through her pregnancy under intense media scrutiny? Then comes the demanding round-the-clock job of caring for and raising the child, all this from someone who is still in high school.

Gov. Pallin should ask herself if the vice presidency is worth the price her family is already paying.

All the name-calling and holier than thou posturing, both from the family values types and women's rights crowd, is shameful and juvenile.

Posted by: Free Thinking | September 2, 2008 12:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How pathetic a post....

Let's see, because a child gets pregnant the parent is some how unable to be a true supporter of "family values".... I thought it was what one said and taught to the child BEFORE and AFTER they child screws up that defined one's "values".... Hence why the "family values" gets excised over cultural groups with very large percentages of their children "raising children".... Oh wait, it's not the "children" doing such it's the "grandmothers"....

Such feminist arrogance...."She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome. Her first priority has to be her children.".... I guess men, Fathers, cant fulfill the role....

McCain was brilliant on this one. You Dems & libs are going to see a land slide wake up call election of McCain/Palin....

You're just too blind by your selfish ideology and too deaf from your blather to figure it out....

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008 12:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin should be home with her children. She should be commended for giving life to a Down Syndrome child, it is a big, big, job to care for him. What is Sarah doing now, but abandoning him for the limelight. She may have 5 children, but she is not a MOTHER! She evidently didn't know what her 17 year old daughter was doing, and she certaintly didn't teach her abstinence. Sarah Palin, get with it and go home and be a MOTHER to your children, especially your little boy who needs so much care.

Posted by: O.M. Gray | September 2, 2008 12:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Palin's Pregnancy Problem? Since when is PREGNANCY A PROBLEM?

What about Kennedy's CHAPPAQUIDDICK PROBLEM?

You liberals just don't get it!

Posted by: sunshine484848 | September 2, 2008 12:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Your claim that McCain made a pick that failed to appeal to you, is absurd John McCain picked Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska and mother of five, to be his running mate to woo women like you? That kind of Twilight Zone expectation is utterly vapid. Ms Quinn, do you really think you are some archetypical or representative woman? Sorry 'Missy' but a Cynical, Collectivist, 'uber alles' Liberal like yourself is hardly disposed to give a fair hearing to any selection by McCain. As a traditional everyday pedestrian American, I take great comfort in the piquish scorn you & the rest of the Socialist Left have shown this accomplished mother of five. Please continue to spew. I promise Sally, America is 'listening'...

Posted by: Angel R. | September 2, 2008 12:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As an American (not a Republican or a Democrat), I believe real change is cleaning up Washington! Sarah Pelin is the first caudate to make me believe that is possible. Selling the state jet on Ebay? Say no more! She's got my vote!

Posted by: Lisa Conrad | September 2, 2008 12:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally:

Your comparison of your disaster at CBS and Sarahs' chances as a good VP are demeaning to women. In your "analysis" one women is just like the next. I hate to upset you but there is a good chance that she is better at managing her life than you are.

Posted by: Terry | September 2, 2008 12:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'll take Palin over Quinn, Biden,Obama any day.

Posted by: rennnndelll | September 2, 2008 12:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Now this is my kinda ticket! MacCain is gonna give that Obama a good ole fashined asswhoopin! I'm a republican from the good ole days and it's good to see somebody with some commen sense. Palin is the new butt kicker and these Dems are gonna be on the run. This obama fool is no different than that osama running around the middle east with the blood of america on his hands. We gotta get some heros in office MacCain is a HERO! Palin is a HERO and even if she wasn't locked in a tiger cage back in Nam at least she knows how to fire guns. MacCain and Pallin have BACKBONE people. They have the backbone that the Dems wish they had. The Dems with their song and dance about not drilling in Alaska are full of hot air. We have more oil sitting in Alaska than those OPEC train robbers do the middle east. I say just drill the damn thing. We have the tecknolegy to replace animals with cloning. So what are you worried about people? We are AMERICANS damn it! Stop boo hooing about roe and wade and wipe that starry eyed look of obama off your faces and lets get to work! freedom and liberty is at steak here.

Posted by: True American | September 2, 2008 12:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment


we have a plane that Governor of Alaska rides. we have snow. we have an Eskimo husband, five children, all of pregnancy have birth.

Ireland, England, Scotland, France, Pasific Ocean, New Ginea, Denmark, Russia and USA, Eskimos, Sibirians, French and Canadians!

Norway is known with NATO. and also another way, Endonesia, Portugal, Holland, Africa, Central Asia and Israel.

we had completely forgotten NATO, MArtin Luther King and Norway. and the Husband of Queen of England is King of Denmark.

and the store for seeds, as Ark of Noah is in Norway. and Candidate John McCAin was Navy Commander in Pasific Ocean and Mediterranean Sea.

Posted by: sthumblewidecircle | September 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

If McCain wanted a woman to gen up the disaffected Hillary Clinton voters, there were much more qualified Republican women he could have chosen (Hutchinson, Snowe, Collins, etc).

McCain was forced to pick Palin because he realized he would lose based on Obama's successful convention, and he needed to shake things up and he picked this particular woman because she is a religious concervative and will excite the religious base for the Republicans.

Posted by: Steve Wild | September 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Excuse me, Ms. Quinn, but you needn't worry your empty little head about what we Evangelical Christian women must decide. You have enough problems of your own - obviously.

Posted by: kati | September 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"This is nothing against Palin. From what little we know about her, she seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person. She certainly has been successful in her 44 years. But is she ready to be president?"

And Obama is ready to be president? Based on what credintals? Alaskan politics has been hit in the head with a two by four since she has taken office. What is going on in south Chicago? The same thing for over 50 years. NO CHANGE, by the candidate for change. What a crock.

Posted by: dick | September 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Stink-O

Bye, Bye O - B.O.


Bye, Bye Obama

Oh, and thank you WaPo your Sick O support is going to be the stake through O's heart!

Posted by: WaPo | September 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow. Sally why aren't you home in the kitchen? Sometimes females can be the worst misogynists on the planet. I was only disappointed you didn't comment on the size of her butt. That would have really put her in her place.

Posted by: Edward G | September 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, your Bio nails you...A WASHINGTON INSIDER...your angry article just shows you you are not one of us...the traditional values, middle America, pro-let-the-babies-live women.
I grew up when I threw away my tie dyed shirts, cut offs, and Jesus sandals in the 70's. When are you going to grow up and shed your radical out dated feminism?

Posted by: sunshine484848 | September 2, 2008 11:58 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Can anyone honestly compare Barack Obama's experience with Sarah Palin's experience? A man who could not pay back his student loans, after graduating from one of the country's premier universities, until just recently, is prepared to handle the nation's affairs? Senator Obama has spent his career talking his way through, but everyone knows talk is cheap. His resume is so thin it can not be found. Obama has never walked the walk and proven he can accomplish, anything except talk people out of their votes. In public office he is a disgraceful non-starter. Buying bloviating is all the democrats have done and they will regret it in the end.

Posted by: bill gearon | September 2, 2008 11:58 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil."

Peculair that you did not mention Obamas two kids and how he should me home taking care of them. What a real sexist hag you are.

"I didn't even want the job, but I didn't feel I could turn it down. Of course it was a disaster."

No suprize there.

Posted by: pappy | September 2, 2008 11:58 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You aren't really in favor of electing women to high office. You are only in favor of electing women who agree with you! What a farce!

Posted by: Jill | September 2, 2008 11:58 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Can the republicans fill an arena as big as Invesco?
i heard they had a tough time filling a small auditorium!! Why are the republicans wasting time here they should be going door to door canvassing, as it is McCain just gave Obama the Presidency on a platter when he picked the lady from up north!!
Cindy watch out Barbie is here!!!!hehe

Posted by: HuLiu | September 2, 2008 11:58 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This is a vapid hit piece. The fact is that dems lose because they don't connect with the center of the country. I was not excited by Mc Cain, but was going to vote against Obama. Now the millions that have taken to calling themselves independents will stream gladly to the RNC because for the first time in a long time somebody who is like us is on the ticket. Obama will win the coasts, Mc Cain will win everywhere else. Obama is too radical. He can play to the center but we don't believe him. His friends and his voting record tells us just who BO is.
I didn't say this first, but don't know who to attribute it to: Obama wants to kill children and raise taxes. Palin wants to raise children and kill taxes.

Posted by: Not a Mc Cain Fan | September 2, 2008 11:58 AM
Report Offensive Comment

If "she" were a man, married, with five children, your concerns would be different, no doubt. Your column is insulting to me as a woman. Maybe you couldn't have handled this, but you, then, are not as strong as she. I am excited about this pick, and for the first time in my life, I have contributed to the campaign.

Posted by: teresa emmanuel | September 2, 2008 11:57 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

You understand the family values crowd about as well as Nancy Pelosi does the Catholic Church's stance and teachings on abortion. Neither of you know what you are taliking about!

Posted by: BOJD | September 2, 2008 11:57 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hi Sally,

The left just doens't get the right. Never has, never will. It's too bad that you are so invested in what you think you know to be open the possibility that you're wrong.

As for all that stuff about Sarah's kids and all that...if that were a left-wing woman, you'd be slamming anyone for suggesting that she can't do it all.

Posted by: Lisa E | September 2, 2008 11:57 AM
Report Offensive Comment

All of the Dems seem to be really mad at this pick. If it really is a bad pick shouldn't they be gleeful. Me thinks they are very worried. BTW I am a stay at home dad who does fine thank you.

Posted by: Ken | September 2, 2008 11:57 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This is probably the most bigoted article I have ever read in a profesional journal. How dare you. Your leftist stereotyping of Christians is despicable and your feminazi stereotyping of women is almost as bad. The fact is a women need not slaughter her own children in order to have a career and the fact is Christians respect a women right to mother regardless of age. Sarah's daughter is also planning to marry the father. All you have done here is prove that your know nothing of family values and that their is something in your past that pushes you to have disdain for mothers. My guess is you slaughtered at least one of your own and need to write this crap to make yourself feel better about it. See shrink you despicable bigot.

Posted by: Ron Fella | September 2, 2008 11:57 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The more I read the establishment pundits like Ms Quinn...who must dredge up any kind of spin to try to demean a Republican ..even if it is a women, the more amused I am. What a double standard!!...and how bankrupt can you become???? What outrage if some critic would dare question a Democrat women holding office because she has children and may not be able to preform her duties!!!... for shame!!! Pure sexism!!!!

I draw comfort that Ms. Quinn and her ilk are really writing columns for their own amusement..surely no reads them and if they do, no one can take them seriously.

Posted by: Larry Bruch | September 2, 2008 11:56 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Your article seems to imply that Palin is a one issue candidate. Abortion does not define the evangelical position and for that matter you haven't a clue as to what is Palin's religious affiliation. You are the cynical one for jumping into the fray so quickly without giving credit to anything Palin has done in the past. I could understand your position had Palin been an insider with a long national record, but there are certainly other outsiders that have gone further. Certainly Alaska is arguably on par with an Arkansas and you let a virtual unknown into office. I'd put her experience up against Obama's anytime and as for Biden, what kind of change should I believe in when the candidate has a 30-year insider record. Give me a break!

Posted by: GoPalin | September 2, 2008 11:56 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ha, ha -

Lib's pretending faith?

Too Funny!

The party that takes to the streets for a persons right to kill the defenseless unborn then turn right around and have a candle light vigil to save or release a serial killer - We got your number its 666.

Bet you are so proud of your little hatch job Sall.

Now, lets ask all this stuff about Obama?

Oops you lose.

Posted by: On Faith? | September 2, 2008 11:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You say you're a person of faith! Well sins are not passed on to the children. You can be insulted all you want but a conservative is what is needed of vp, since McCain isn't one.
What's wrong with you?

Posted by: Unbelievable | September 2, 2008 11:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

wow! Shouldn't you be at home cooking for YOUR husband? Don't you have a shirt to iron or something? Judge yourself by the same stick lady. You democrats wouldn't be so hateful toward her if you were not so threatened by her. So my words to you are to shut up and quit your job, your just a woman and your opionions don't matter. No one is listenig to you anyway. You are a complete disgrace to your family! Your husband is supposed to be your number one priority! You have nothing to offer and untill he is dead or has divorced you you have no right to speak your mind or attempt to make a difference in the world.

Posted by: kat | September 2, 2008 11:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

She was in elected office and held accountable by voters 5 years before Barack Obama. She has been in politics since 1992. Obama has actually worked in the US Senate 143 days! Obama got a job then immediately made his passion in life pursuing a promotion. That is not experience, that is self-absorption. McCain had the experience so he could afford to pick someone complimentary. Obama lacked it so he had to get a hack from inside the Beltway who has twice failed to get any interested outside the 3 counties in Delaware.

Posted by: Tom King | September 2, 2008 11:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Doesn't she have a husband, perhaps he can help his
children as well or are men completely
irrelevant or not capable in your circles. Plus
there must some government program out there to take
care of our children for us as we work and make money to pay the taxes the government has put on us.
Best of Luck

Posted by: sign guy | September 2, 2008 11:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The all-important purpose of choosing a Vice Presidential candidate is to govern if the President were to become incapacitated. Demonstrated competence should be the first consideration in the selection. The fact that Sarah Palin's name never came up in the short list of supposedly competent candidates speaks volumes about the appropriateness of her selection. I am a Republican woman and am so angry that I could spit nails.

Posted by: SwimWaters | September 2, 2008 11:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment

When did Sally Quinn get added to the Obama payroll? If Palin had a squeeky clean family Quinn would have undoubtly claimed she didn't represent a majority of women in America. Amazing how the mainstream media portrays only liberal women as qualified to hold public office. Simply disgusting!

Posted by: Bryan W | September 2, 2008 11:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,

I'm voting for Obama, but I find this column insulting and petty. It simply isn't for YOU to decide how another woman should raise her children. Of all the issues about which we should be concerned, this one isn't even in the top 20.

Lets assume the worst - that Palin ends up neglecting her 4 children while serving as VP. So what? There are millions of children in our country who go to bed hungry and/or don't have health insurance. At least the Palin kids will be well tended to by someone, even if it is a team of nannies. Besides, how many father have held demanding political jobs and ended up neglecting their families. The Palin kids certainly will not be the first.

Find a real issue over which to opine...

Posted by: Heather | September 2, 2008 11:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Please keep beating the experience drum. She has more executive experience than Biden and Obama combined. Obama has never been in a position where he is solely responsible for the decesions he makes, Palin has.

Posted by: Morgan | September 2, 2008 11:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I can show you many excellent "hands on" mothers who have had both sons and daughters have babies outside of marriage. Where is your head and your objectivity? Its what you do with the situation of a pregnancy outside of a marriage that counts. The Palin's are doing the right thing and they will be embraced by everyone. Well, not everyone. There is, of course NARAL, Planned Parenthood and the author of this pathetic piece of "journalism" we all need to be concerned about.

Posted by: RGB | September 2, 2008 11:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with your oints. It would have been fair to mention that she is not the only one responsible for her decisions regarding her family, so is her husband and her children's father!

Posted by: Billie Rosene | September 2, 2008 11:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The plain truth is, if Sarah Palin is not qualified to be Vice President, then Barack Obama certainly is not qualified to be President. In every objective comparison of executive experience, she is much more qualified because she at least has some. And the experience she has, as a former mayor and current governor of Alaska, is more than McCain's, Obama's, and Biden's combined.

I'm sure if the Democrats had their own Sarah Palin, lack of experience would not be an issue. After all, Obama's complete lack of experience isn't.

Posted by: Dave M. | September 2, 2008 11:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally,
Are you jealous? I know that Hillary was your champion(you bought into her) and yet she was thrown under the bus by B. Hussein. You sold out your soul to the DNC long ago and yet are still pulling that lever like a deer caught in a headlight. I would have thought that Palin would agree with you(mother, feminist, wife, daughter with disability, another daughter dealing with issues of her own?). What does this say about you? Are you afraid that the GOP will put the first woman as VP, just as they have as NSA advisor, Secretary of State, and other important cabinet positions? Oh, the Democrats have not done this, have they? Sally, perhaps it is time to look into the mirror and face the fact that you have been backing the wrong horse for far too long. Go McCain/Palin '08!!!

Posted by: Kevin Davis | September 2, 2008 11:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Lets look at this from the insider position within the dem party. Obama made a speech! Now to Obamas' credit he negotiated the Chicago underworld without receiving charges. He managed to spend nearly twenty years listening to a racist preacher without absorbing a word said! He honestly believes friendship with Ayers is a good thing. He endorses the communist viewpoint. Hope and Change is his dream, to late MLK beat him to that. Living in a dream world is not an asset. He has managed to use his time as a senator mostly to run for president. Not fair to his constituents but hey you need to look after yourself, I get that. He wants to help underpriviledged but his own family lives in an out house in Nairobi. It could be he didn't know of this brothers existence, but he does now, and my guess the guy lives in the same outhouse. Says a lot about the family of Americans. Oh! wait Obama and his wife struggled to pay off education related bills instead of sending him a dollar a month to double his income. I guess there is only so much that can be done at 4 million a year. Give me a break. Someone give me a substantive reason to consider Obama for president. One just One.

Posted by: donald cantrell | September 2, 2008 11:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

There are plenty of 'hands on' mothers who's children have become pregnant in their teenage years, where have you been. I find your article insulting and I am a Conservative, a Christian, and a woman.

Posted by: Leeners | September 2, 2008 11:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What a surprise! Sally Quinn lecturing Middle America and the West, primitive lands, on cynicism.

West of the Blue Ridge Mountains there is no culture, only primitive humanoids.

They haven't even read the Post or the Times.

Posted by: What a hoot! | September 2, 2008 11:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment

If nothing else, the choice of Palin is making the hypocritical left show their true colors. Where were the articles blasting HRC and her lack of experience? Why is it OK for a socialist male minority with zero experience to be prez, but not OK for a conservative white female to be vice-prez? The best part about this, is that the left is completely blind to their hypocrisy and actually believe that the world is laughing WITH them...not at them.

Posted by: Andy P | September 2, 2008 11:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment

If you think he picked her just because shes "a woman" I think you are mistaken. If you look at her values, what she stands for, and what she has done; you will understand his choice.

"She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy." You are correct on that, but neither does Barack Obama so that is no argument for this. She is #2, Barack Obama is #1.

I am surprised at what people are saying about this. It is really getting to me how people are talking down to Sarah Palin for things that are actually positives.

Lance
http://www.AmericaAgainstObama.com

Posted by: Lance Haynie | September 2, 2008 11:50 AM
Report Offensive Comment

A few things:
1) You obviously are not part of the family values crowd and have no understanding of how they think because they will accept Bristol Palin's situation with lovingkindness and not shun her or her mother. Besides her daughter's pregnancy is irrelevant to her political ambitions.
2) If Sarah Palin is not ready to be president how can you support Obama? He has one year of Senate experience prior to running for president (even Hillary looks experienced with only 8 years compared to Obama). Prior to that he was part of the Democratic machine in Chicago, one of the most corrupt political organizations around. At least Sarah is a reformer.
3) As far as picking a woman just because she is a woman, so what the Democrats have been doing that for eons. Besides you guys picked a completely inexperienced guy over a bunch of other much more experienced guys (and one lady) and a major reason was because he is black.
I feel sorry for you that your hypocrisy is now so apparent.

Posted by: CAK | September 2, 2008 11:50 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Quick question: Palin is the governor of the larget state in the US. The state Palin governs is the only state in the nation that resides completly between two foreign countries. Palin has exeperience at every level of government (PTA, town council, mayor, governor). Yet you claim she has nothing to compete with Obama? Obama, who has never run a state. Obama, who has never had to interact with any foreign state? Obama, who had a wife raise his children? Hate to break it to you, but just because you couldn't hack it when brought up to the big time, in regard to "reporting", doesn't mean she, too, is a green pea with such little talent and capability. Palin has more experience and a better resume than the democrat party's presidential candidate! Hilarious!

Posted by: Mike N | September 2, 2008 11:50 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Everyone get off Obama's back. After all, Fidel Castro had no executive experience other than "Community Organization" and look how well that turned out.

Posted by: Jack | September 2, 2008 11:50 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What are you so afraid of? If she is what you say, and we are dealing with an informed electorate, you won't have to worry will you/

Posted by: Carmen A. Renaldy III | September 2, 2008 11:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This sounds like a lot of whining to me.

Being an evangelical does not mean she pretends to be perfect. Her daughter's situation is an unfortunate one that has been common in all-too many families in these days. What you need to do is to look at her response to it, not point fingers in an attempt to accuse her of hypocricy or failure as a parent.

Would you rather have Obama's stated response of letting his daughter have an abortion so she wouldn't be "punished with a baby" for an indescretion? Instead, Palin's daughter will marry the father and raise the child. What a wonderful example to all of us.

If you want to compare experience, Palin actually has more exectutive experience than Obama. She's actually run things of consequence and faced opposition as she helped bring about change. Obama, a former community organizer with very shallow Senate experience, just talks about change with very polished skills as an orator. If you look at Obama's background and the kinds of people he has surrounded himself with, you should see the kind of change he really wants to bring about. That should scare you.

You sound as if what you quoted from the Southern Baptist statement of faith is a put-down of women. However, millions of men and women who actually believe and understand what the Bible says about such things would disagree.

But if you want to fault Palin for a lack of experience as VP candidate, you effectively eliminate Obama as a viable choce for president. You can't have it both ways.

Posted by: SteveB | September 2, 2008 11:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I echo the previous cries of "hypocrite" when reading this bitter, catty post. So-called "feminists" should cheer the choice of a smart, capable, well-spoken woman for such a position. Instead, we get the rather odd line of attack that she is supposed to be at home with her kids, cooking for her husband and sticking to the PTA because she can't handle more. Go ahead, now lecture me about "equal pay for equal work" and "glass ceilings". I'm sure in your confused head, it's not contradictory at all.

Posted by: amazed | September 2, 2008 11:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess Sally Quinn is right. Women with children should not be involved in public service or politics. I thought women with careers and family were applauded by liberals. Seems like Ms. Quinn supports the "barefoot and pregnant" approach.

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008 11:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Yeah, I guess all women with children should stay home barefoot and naked in the bedroom. Why did women enter the workforce anyway? How can we send them into combat if they have children? How can they do ANYTHING if they have children according to your line of reasoning?

Posted by: JRM | September 2, 2008 11:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I find it amazing the stuff people will find to complain about. So what if picking a woman was a political move. It's what the people seemed to want. Isn't that what politicians do? give the people what they want? or should they do like Bush did and 'stay the course'. The democrats were just patting themselves on the back.. "Oh we have a black man and a woman running for our ticket, how open minded and ground breaking are we? the Republicans only have an old rich white guy.. how typical" .. well I would say how was that not cynical too?
as far as her daughter being pregnant.. SO WHAT? girls get that sometimes.

Posted by: byron | September 2, 2008 11:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You liberals never stop do you? Palin may be one heartbeat away from the presidency, but you are putting Obama one measly vote away from the presidency. Obama is not qualified to be president, and last I checked we are voting for who is on the top of the ticket. Palin in her acceptance speech listed many of her accomplishments as governor of Alaska ... something that Obama has been unable to do in any of his speeches. Obviously you democrats are expecting and hoping for McCain to die sometime within the next four years, and while it is a possibility, it honestly probably won't happen and you know it. If it does, I trust that Palin would do a great job in keeping the country steady and she would do much better from day one than Obama would ever be able to "hope" to.

Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2008 11:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The louder the radical left screams, the more I'm convinced Senator McCain made the right choice.

Posted by: WayneM | September 2, 2008 11:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh Sally,
What a joke you make of women. Get over your fear of Sarah. She is amazing. I am incredulous that you and many other liberal women are knocking her for "not putting her family first." Who the hell are you to judge? I am sure you put YOURSELF first. Did the numerous nannys you hired take care of your only child? Oh please Sally. Have a cocktail party, and let the topic of conversation be how smart you are, how wonderful you are, and how you aren't jealous of this amazing "outsider."
Please get over yourself, and go get a manicure.

Posted by: Jana | September 2, 2008 11:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am a life-long Democrat who can't remember the last Republican I voted for. Yet, after Hillary's defeat, I was prepared to vote for McCain. Obama lacked experienced and I didn't know him. Now, McCain has added an inexperienced person as VP. The man is 72 with 4 bouts of cancer. I'm back to voting the Democratic ticket. I am tremendously disappointed with McCain's choice. Instead of a woman making me vote for him, his choice has turned me away.

Posted by: Linda Simmons | September 2, 2008 11:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally totally Amazing how many posts are on this blog about you! You have to be flattered that you are in the spotlight more than Sarah WHO! Well done!!

Can you imagine her having discussions with Putin and at the same time having to take care of her kids and grandchild. I know her son is old enough but doesn't he need his mothers support. How often has she traveled and for what lengths of time!! Has she ever met a Foreign head of state!!

Does she know the names of Foreign Presidents, like Bush knew!! How could McCain pick someone who was under investigation! Did McCain not know that Sarah's daughter would be hounded by the press. What was he thinking? can McCain make a decision?? i don't think so!! look what happened to his pick!!! Is he going to Change her for Joe Liberman! He better do it soon, time is running out!! Then you will get another 2000 hits or more. You are one smart LADY!!


Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 11:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

C'mon Sally, I was just on Scarborough's show talking about how the child's pregnancy was a private issue for the family and should be off-limits.

Just because you believe that a "mother's role is different from a father's" doesn't mean you have the right to go off message.

We need to consider whether your editorial load should be cut back in order to care for your special needs child. After all, if a story breaks at 3am and he's feeling ill, can we really count on you?

p.s. Glad to see you got the talking points memo on McCain's Four Bouts with a Deadly Cancer response. That somewhat large Baltimore Sun female/mother columnist did a little better job with the prose though.

Posted by: J Meach | September 2, 2008 11:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin will not only be the next VP of the United States, but she will be the first woman president. She is the living embodiment of the "Founding Mothers" of our nation. While John Adams was off on diplomatic missions to France and England, Abigail Adams was running the family plantation as well as her husband's law practice. She was sending her husband political advice while raising a future president of the United Sates and birthing and burying her children. If Abigail Adams had been able to run for President she would have certainly been more qualified than a professor and community organizer who hasn't even run a senate committee and so is Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Robin Fox | September 2, 2008 11:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What a load of garbage that Sally Quinn has written. As you read the article you realize that 95% is personal and there is just enough meat on the bone to keep one from starving. Sally conveniently left out that Sarah Pallin has more experience in executive management, by being Gov of AK than Barak, who is a senator where you govern by consensus. Editor of the Harvard Law review, now there's a job that prepares one to lead the US. A new Mom, that disqualifies her from any job that requires leadership, dedication, a lot of hours and decision making, well that excludes 35 % of the population from those meaningful jobs.Let's wait for the debates to see how she does before we disqualify her from any "meaningful" jobs. Barak impressed me with his statements that family and certainly children are off limits. the media is crucifying Sarah and they, and us, don't even know how she will perform. let's give her a chanch and then make informed judgements before we continue to pillory her in the press.

Posted by: Ray George Jr | September 2, 2008 11:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, what a bigot you are. First you are 'mad' at McCain -- like you would EVER vote for him -- because he chose a candidate appealing to evangelicals.

And then you have the nerve to criticize someone who personifies the feminist dream of full womanhood with a high-powered career, a large family and stellar professional credentials.

As usual, reactionaries like you can't muster sound arguments, so you check your brain at the door and just start blasting away. In this case, your bigotry and hypocrisy sail way over the heads of reason.

Posted by: Bradford Lang | September 2, 2008 11:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother."

Why? I've yet read no evangelical commentators raise any question about this. Are you seriously questioning if a woman can do it all?

"This is no time to play gender politics". Isn't this what your entire column was devoted to?

Posted by: EK | September 2, 2008 11:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with your article. I understand that Palin is an avid hunter and as an 85 year old woman,the thought of her out there maybe shooting Bambi's mamma does not appeal to me.

Posted by: M arjorie Davis | September 2, 2008 11:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Picking Palen was a brilliant move by McCain. She epitomizes the candidate conservatives are looking for. She is a natural leader who represents traditional family values that makes America great. She is also attractive and is bringing in more money to the campaign than any other choice would have.
Her charisma and record of accomplishments has put a strong challenge to the Obama/Biden ticket and democrats know it. That is why the NY liberal media is doing everything they can to find fault and magnify issues that are non existence in importance. They do NOT want their candidate Obama to lose...and anything goes!

Posted by: Vince Hugh | September 2, 2008 11:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Jealous.

Posted by: Lowell | September 2, 2008 11:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment



A "calculated move"? Meanwhile, Obama chose Biden by pulling his name out of a hat.
How could McCain be so cold and diabolical as to choose Palin "to try to win an election"? It's as if he wants to become president or something.

Posted by: Greg McFarlane | September 2, 2008 11:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Is she ready to be president?!?!

Are you serious Sally? Is Obama ready to be president? The answer is a resounding HELL NO!

What? Did you and Sally (Baltimore) and Fatimah (Philadelphia) get together at Starbucks this morning to write your attack articles?!?

You three are idiots! More eveidence of the lib's fear! McCain got it right - somone who represents regular Americans with a proven track record of reform and you can't stand it! - She trumps Barry's "Change" platform hand's down!

Posted by: patriot | September 2, 2008 11:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You are such a sexist and a hypocrite. You make fun of the wife serving the man, and imply that it should be a 50/50 marriage. So where is Mr Palin's responsibility now. Can he not nurture and oversee the children. Only a hypocrite can have it both ways.

Lack of foreign policy experience is such a joke and a sexist charge. No one said a word about John Edwards, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan. GWB, Jimmy (one term) Carter's lack of foreign policy experience. She shared a long border with a foreign country; it worked for GWB. Only a sexist could not see that she is as experienced as those who have gone before her.

Posted by: Joe Thompson | September 2, 2008 11:44 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't recall Vice President Al Gore giving up his office when his son was charged with a variety of drug and alcohol offenses, including DWI, and was obviously a deeply troubled youth in need of his father's attention. Why one standard for him and another for Palin?

Posted by: Truthsayer | September 2, 2008 11:44 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You're the On Faith columnist? You twist "faith" into a blunt instrument to bludgeon a political candidate. You certainly do not speak for MY faith, even though you seem to like to pretend that you do.

Posted by: George | September 2, 2008 11:44 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Perhaps you can get a lense implanted in your navel. It is apparent that your head is so far up your butt that you can't see where you're going.

Posted by: jackal | September 2, 2008 11:43 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, please stop!
You are insulted because McCain picked a woman because it was "cynical"....but not insulted when the Democratic Party picked a completely unqualified African American for the same "political" reasons?

You thought we were "beyond that" when running women because of their gender? Have you read Hillary's speeches over the last several years? It all about being a woman.......

Come on!!! Think before you write these columns that contravene everything you have written prior!

Posted by: David Simmons | September 2, 2008 11:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Good thing, you're a woman. Had a man written that screed ("Of course women can be good mothers and have careers at the same time... Nancy Pelosi has five children, but she didn't get heavily involved in politics until they were older. A mother's role is different from a father's.") it might be considered just a wee bit.... uhm... patronizing.

Posted by: frank | September 2, 2008 11:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

That is original.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 11:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I think Ms Quinn has been inside the beltway too long. Perhaps a summer spent touring the nation, spending quality time with the little people would give her a wider perspective. But maybe it's best she stay where she is.

Posted by: ODIrony | September 2, 2008 11:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

McCain clearly has nothing to fear from the evangelicals and other assorted rightwingers - he is right with their God. Now all he has to contend with is the rest of the nation.

They might have expected better from a Presidential candidate - unless Palin steps down, this should signal the end for McCain.

Posted by: pontificator | September 2, 2008 11:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

you are clueless.

family values? yeah - keeping the baby. bad things happen. good people deal with them and embrace them.

go sarah!

Posted by: aos | September 2, 2008 11:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Libs = Nuts!

Posted by: ozhole | September 2, 2008 11:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally's understanding of the Evangelical community is so out of touch it's just time for her to go to school on them. Live with some - drive around with them - get to know them. It's amazing and it's not a slam on Sally it's just revealing how little she understands that community of people. It's like she is singing from some 40 year version of another America and another Christian community. I'm sorry Sally but it really does reveal stark STARK ignorance of what you are talking about. That is not meant as an insult it just is you don't know them or you wouldn't assume they'd have this big problem with this teen pregnancy.

Posted by: Oregon Democrat | September 2, 2008 11:40 AM
Report Offensive Comment

First of all, to think that the evangelical base will not vote for McCain because of a teen pregnancy is a far more cynical point of view not to mention completely hypocritical. As for Palin being a working Mom and whether she has neglected her family in doing so, that is her choice and her freewill. It is certainly not a choice I would have wanted my wife to make but we aren't talking about her. The only question here is whether McCain/Palin are worthy of our vote. I think they are not but that can be determined from a political standpoint.

Posted by: Tim | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Is this the new DNC talking points column. In 7 different anti-Palin columns in 2 days I have read McCain is old and has had 4 bouts with deadly cancer. And blasting her for spending time with her family ... Didn't you all praise Edwards who went on the campaign trail while his wife was battling terminal cancer? Don't call the evangelicals hypocritical when you are just as bad. And when is the article about Obama leaving his two young daughters at home to be president or Biden staying in the Senate when his wife died and he had two young sons at home ....

Posted by: Dino | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, you are pathetic. It's patently clear that McCain outsmarted B.O. by selecting a very talented, young politician who also happens to be a woman from outside the Beltway, and that McCain will likely win as a result. I'm sure that you're thinking, "If only B.O. had done the same!" Instead he went the "No Change" route by picking an old doofus like Biden who grew up in Wash DC. Re your outrage that her daughter became pregnant out of wedlock, I thought that's what liberals want -- sex outside of marriage whenever and with whomever. I guess her only mistake was not killing the baby in her womb, right?

Posted by: Go McCain/Palin | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Stop the "hack attack." Don't they pay people at this outlet for journalism and not smears?

Posted by: Drew from S. Jersey | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I believe this article is spot on. All thinking women should be greatly offended. This act of pandering follows along the same lines of the Gas Tax Holiday McCain proposed earlier this summer.

I am a well-to-do Black American, and would be just as offended if he had chosen a Shill black candidate. Women will never be able to achieve parity if these types of things continue to persist.

Unfortunately, my party has been once again hijacked by the Christian Radical Right. I was torn at the beginning of this process, but am now definitely not voting Republican. Ron Paul is looking soooo tempting these days!

Posted by: Cortez | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I like the choice of Governor Palin for the vice president. She is a good conservative and that makes the McCain ticket a winner for me! Calm down Sally Quinn, Americans will vote for Governor Palin because they think like she does and they admire her leadership, not because she is a woman. If you don't agree with her way of thinking, you will have to vote against a woman; I think that is your personal problem!

Posted by: Jeffrey P. Clagett | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Welcome to the real world, Sally, where teenagers get pregnant, where women can be both mothers and leaders, and where the political status quo can be shaken by a relative outsider. "Cynical choice"-hardly. Inspired, high risk, and bold seem more fitting adjectives.

Posted by: Tripp | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Do people really want this kind of so called EXPERIENCE that McCain has or the the really BETTER JUDGEMENT that Obama possesses.
Please Republicans, wake up, this is not the same party of RONALD REAGAN. The evangelical LEADERSHIP has sold their souls to the devil.

Posted by: Nick | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey everyone, not only does Mrs. Quinn insult women and mothers, she also insulted Catholics and other Christians when she (avowed atheist) took communion at Tim Russert's funeral and later said it made her feels nauseous. How can someone have a religion blog when they have no respect or knowledge of the basic tenants of one of the world's major religions?

Posted by: Happy Conservative | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Just because Sally wasn't ready to chat it up on primetime doesn't mean that Palin will be a failure. She may be able to handle the pressure much better. Why would you even compare yourself to her? You were never on tv for a day in your life, and she is the governor of Alaska. Apparently, you weren't even Busch League and she is succeeding in the majors. Palin will do fine.

Posted by: unqualified guy | September 2, 2008 11:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Of all the nonsense in this column, the "a mother's role is differnt from that of a father" is by far what I find most insulting. So you're saying a father of five can serve in office because he really has nothing to do with his children, but a mother of five is excluded? Nonsense! As a father and grandfather I can tell you that I have been every bit as involved in the lives of my children and grandchildren as my wife. What a sexist, insulting and degrading comment, to both men and women.

Posted by: Richard | September 2, 2008 11:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment

My children are grown now...all six of them. I'm a registered nurse who has had many opportunities to accept work that would have paid me a very fine salary. Like Sarah Palin, I love all my children and wanted what was best for them. I had to make decisions in my life according to what would be best for them....after all, I chose to have them. When my fourth child (our only son) was adolescent, he had cancer. My youngest child was two years old. At that time, I was offered the job of a life time. We sure could have used the money, but I knew where I belonged. I have no regret in having chosen to be with my son and five other children. I'm sorry Mrs. Palin was put in this position and has chosen to further exclude her young family who now need her "hands on " more then ever.

Posted by: Rose McCarthy | September 2, 2008 11:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job? She is the mother of five children, one of them a four-month-old with Down Syndrome. Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?"

Sally, would you ask this same question of Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, not to mention all the other politicians--men and women--who have children?

Oh, wait a minute, you are a hypocritical, Northeastern liberal snob who only believes that "capable" Democratic women know how to juggle the responsibility of family and political office. What utterly vapid tripe you serve up!

Posted by: YoYo Pa | September 2, 2008 11:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment


Mrs PAlin is catholic and in the widest catholics, marriage is after pregnancy, according to Bible and life of saints, John Jesus and MAry. we must read the language and words, CAndidate John McCain has been verbalizing with the governor of Alaska that have met six months ago!

what is the structure they have been building, as the Ark of Noah, to launch and sail in these eight years!?

Posted by: sthumblewidecircle | September 2, 2008 11:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment

O please! You are offended? Shock and anger? What the hell are you talking about? You know you had no intention of voting for McCain so why would it matter to you who he picked as his VP? You arrogant elitists in the media make me sick.

Posted by: Doug | September 2, 2008 11:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, I am glad most woman do not think the way you do...If your name wasn't Sally, I would have thought the article was written by a male shovenist Democrat in the tank for Obama. What a disgrace! As a Govenor, Palin has been the CEO of one of the wealthiest states in America for 2yrs, made executive descions on state budgets, crisis management, conservation, energy, etc...Obama's 3 yrs of US senate experience is dwarft becasue he has been on the presidential campaign trail for 19mos, besides O's appying the first chair not second like Palin...Nice try, but the American see through people like you and will express that with thier vote in November.

Posted by: Lgarcia- Texas | September 2, 2008 11:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you very much for this thoughtful commentary. I think you've summarized the concerns about Gov. Palin very accurately. I would only add that when people point to the governor's "executive experience" - this vague term that is now making the rounds - they should consider Obama's own "executive experience" as leader of his presidential campaign. His campaign has thousands of employees (similar to the state of Alaska) and a budget of tens of millions of dollars per month. Isn't that also "executive experience?" Isn't the presidency an extension of the presidential campaign? How can Obama and Palin even be compared in this regard?

Posted by: Colorado Voter | September 2, 2008 11:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"This is nothing against Palin. From what little we know about her, she seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person. She certainly has been successful in her 44 years. But is she ready to be president?"

If it wasn't for women thinking as simply as this, calling her attractive, instead of focusing on her qualifications it wouldn't have happened. You feminist always say you are just as good as a man but yet you think so simply, then get pissed when a guy figures out, that your just women.

Posted by: CHRIS | September 2, 2008 11:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

McCain, is just the opposite of what he claims to be.

Posted by: Jeronimo Dan | September 2, 2008 11:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Surely McCain could have found a woman with "Community Organizer" experience.

Posted by: jack | September 2, 2008 11:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Wow, I am glad most woman do not think the way you do...If your name wasn't Sally, I would have thought the article was written by a male shovenist Democrat in the tank for Obama. What a disgrace! As a Govenor, Palin has been the CEO of one of the wealthiest states in America for 2yrs, made executive descions on state budgets, crisis management, conservation, energy, etc...Obama's 3 yrs of US senate experience is dwarft becasue he has been on the presidential campaign trail for 19mos, besides O's appying the first chair not second like Palin...Nice try, but the American see through people like you and will express that with thier vote in November.

Posted by: LG | September 2, 2008 11:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This is such a funny little piece. You obviously do not know Sarah. Not only will she win the hearts and minds of "normal" women but many independents and conservatives as well as moderate democrats. What a wonderful choice for VP. Keep in mind that she was not picked to influence the anti-gun, pro-abortion hippie/elitist types such as yourself and your gaggle of close friends. She is going to electrify the fly-over middle american working class like we haven't seen since Reagan...yes, I said it. Watch and learn. And with all the hub-bub from the left it just shows what a wonderful pick this was and obviously has you all shaking in your boots.

Posted by: Rett Hodge | September 2, 2008 11:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You should get a hold of Joe Trippi's article before you make yourself look like an even bigger fool. If you really think that John McCain chose her solely because she is a woman, you shouldn't even be writing your column. As for Joe Biden's foreign relations experience, he really looks like he is on top of things when he votes against the first Gul war on the early 90's and for this Iraq war--here is someone who apparently hasn't used any of his foreign relations experience when he makes major decisions.
God Bless

Posted by: Melissa K | September 2, 2008 11:34 AM
Report Offensive Comment

McCain chose her because of her principals and she is a woman and I think you should let Sarah decide is she is ready for VP. Do you speak for everyone? Are you trying to compare the VP to an anchorwomen's position that you gave up after four months? That is not long enough to determine how tough a job is. But is very easy to criticize people isn't it.

Posted by: Jerry McKnight | September 2, 2008 11:34 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally you are aparently a Washington Post reporter because you are a woman. Normally a man would do it better. Right? Hey isn't that the same logic you use against Sarah Palin? She was chosen simply because she is a woman. Do you read? Do you do ANY homework or are you so incredibly biased, dismayed and angry that woman could be a conservative and a gutsy maverick. Are you angry that she just happens to be attractive? Did you do any research on the enormous amount of work that went into deciding on Palin, in fact going all the way back to last February? Palin's biggest problem is that she is attractive. If she were older, overweight and held an angry demeanor, we wouldn't be reading the negative destructive commentary. Kind of reminds me of that old shampoo commercial from about a decade ago, " please don't hate me because I'm beautiful".

Personally, I am thrilled at McCain's choice. First we say we want change. We want new blood. We want women in power but then when it we get them, we set out to destroy them. Remember, our parents and teacher told us, "anyone can be President". Now this proves that anyone can be President...or Vice President.

I hestitated to vote for McCain but now...I can't wait to vote. In the meantime, I expect a lot of angry left-win-nuts to come out of the woodwork in an attempt to destroy Palin.

Posted by: Alex Campbell | September 2, 2008 11:34 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally - your first reaction was shock? Then anger? Wow, what a hardened pro of a journalist you are. And you think because he daughter "does it" she will lose the "family values" voters? You leave in the beltway fog dear - you are out of touch, and I kindly submit that you should consider getting out of journalism. Shocked. Angered. What tripe.

Posted by: Jim Kwawchyk | September 2, 2008 11:33 AM
Report Offensive Comment


Ya, I have a professor who is not of medicine.

What a break. Perhaps he will do brain surgery better, and with less hangups than the brain surgeons amongst all those persnickly, inbred medical staff persons.

You know how they are. Famous, maybe corrupt and around too long. The unmedicine prof is standing by, in case there's any emergency.

Very reassuring.

Posted by: o please | September 2, 2008 11:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Failed liberal social programs have created more unwed mothers than any other event in our nation's history.

Posted by: jhc | September 2, 2008 11:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, three of the four canidates are senators in the lowest polling congress in years so why not a outsider? Experience does not always make a good president, justlook at past examples! The Dems have their rock star, now we have ours!

Posted by: James Overlie | September 2, 2008 11:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

For me, the most astonishing part of this article was Ms. Quinn's quotation of the statement from the Baptist Faith & Message. I am shocked that any thinking person could be offended by this statement of Biblical values, equality in the eyes of God, and obligation to lovingly serve one another in marriage. Her disdain for these traditional and mainstream ideas betrays her complete failure to grasp the basic tenets of the Christian faith. It's also a perfect example of the total disconnect between liberal/feminist idealogues and the average American.
She attacks McCain as a panderer, hoping to distract her readers from the more obvious message of Gov. Palin's selection: radical feminists like Ms. Quinn don't want to see the advancement of all women, only liberal women who hate traditional values as much as they do.

Posted by: Robert | September 2, 2008 11:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Once again another looser tries to compare herself with Mrs Palin, and fails miserably. Sally your arguments simply dont hold water. Mrs Palins daughters situation is no more taxing on her than her whole familys situation. She has done fine by them and by the great state of Alaska while being a great mom. What you libs dont understand is FAMILY. Because of your moral bankruptcy you see the family as some kind of freak show that cannot stand up to problems that arise because they belive in creationism or they exercise their freedom of choice to raise a child that most libs would abort! Now she has to be a mom instead of the vice president? Where is the feminists now that its a conservative running. Mrs Palin will be what she has always been, The Best that she can be. Thats more than we can say about Hillary Or even you Sally.

Posted by: Mr Bill :o | September 2, 2008 11:31 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You are dead wrong. And comparing your stint at CBS is nothing compared to this, so don't try to twist your experience into hers. Also, have you ever considered that McCain picked her because she is a TRUE conservative? She has moral clarity and has conservative convictions - more then any of the other short/long list VP choices (Lieberman, Ridge, Romney, Hutchinson). She has guts. So, tell me - who is the one who is insulting?? You are!! - by looking beyond her other attributes and accolades and looking merely at her sex. Shame on you.

Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2008 11:31 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Your essay not only confounds me, especially with the heading of your colu,m "On Faith". One can envision you on a mountain top casting stones on sinners, you who is without sin! This young lady erred and as Jesus Christ would do, she would be forgiven and not stoned as you so summarily do with your co-mescient Mr. Meacham.Must Sarah Palin be damned because wh is a woman? Must she be damned because hr daughter faulted? Can you indeed fault her for having delivered a child with Down Syndrome, one God ordained?You are a hypocrite and belie the fact thast your are indeed one who write a colum "On Faith" Ot should be retitled with something that ruly conveys your cyncism your absolute shiled of hate you display with your every word.

Posted by: hurricane joe | September 2, 2008 11:31 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin is a fantastic choice and I'm saddened to see (well, read) that you believe she was selected merely because of her gender. You are also parroting the liberal line of Palin being 'one heartbeat away' from the presidency should McCain get elected. We need to get behind the competent McCain/Palin ticket and ensure they're victorious in November.

Posted by: Gary | September 2, 2008 11:31 AM
Report Offensive Comment

My, doesn't this smack a bit of a certain kind of reverse sexism?

Would Palin's daughter have been better off aborting the child? It would have made Gov. Palin's life "easier", wouldn't it? But of course this "choice" of leadership is quite hard for elite's like Ms. Quinn to accept.

For Ms. Quinn, only women who look and act like her deserve the "priviledge" to represent the people.

What a grunting and ignorant assessment of Sarah Palin, and what a fine example of the kind of self-possessed myopicism that is endemic the to the inside Washington thinktankdom world.

Ms. Quinn, we "ordinary" Americans see in Sarah Palin one of our own, and you most definitely are not one of us....

Posted by: Johnnyjoe in KC | September 2, 2008 11:31 AM
Report Offensive Comment

My first reaction was shock, too. Sarah who? My second reaction was not anger. After learning more about McCain's VP choice, and listening to her speak, I think picking her was a brilliant idea. And guess what? I'm not a member of the evangelical, anti-abortion pack, either! Sarah Palin is more experienced than Barack Obama, savvy, intelligent, PLUS she is a woman and mother. Your article is belittling,dismissive and hypocritical.

Posted by: Iowa | September 2, 2008 11:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn,

I'll take executive experience over the editor of the Harvard Law review any day!

Also, she is not a lawyer, and we middle americans love that about her.

Posted by: Whit | September 2, 2008 11:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally Quinn is an idiot! The entire media is so in the tank for Hussain Obama - it makes me sick.

Posted by: Dean | September 2, 2008 11:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"Who wouldn't jump at the chance to be Vice Presidnet of this great country!"
I certainly would not if my family was in this much chaois!!
"What the f--k were they thinking!"

Posted by: Lisa | September 2, 2008 11:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"what little we know of her"?? What do you people ever tell us about Obama? Something about change?

Posted by: allhaileris | September 2, 2008 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama's total lack of experience to become commander in chief doesn't bother his supporters one bit. But it is okay to attack Governor Pahlin, even though what little executive experience she has had, is more than Obama and Biden combined.
As an evangelical, I am 100% behind John Mccain and Sarah Pahlin. It is unfortunate Governor Pahlin's daughter is pregnant at such a young age, but I am thankful she wants to keep the baby and not abort it.
If the news media went after Obama's background like they are with Governor Pahlin, we all would know a lot more about Ayergate, Rezkogate, not too mention the Chicago "good ole boy" political machine that is currently under investigation.
With all due respect Ms Quinn, to compare being hired by CBS to being asked to run as a VP is a real stretch.

Posted by: Mike Smith | September 2, 2008 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Has Sally Quinn taken leave of her senses? Does she have a clue about "family values" and what they represent? Apparently not. Sally--I hate to break the news to you--Palin's daughter isn't aborting her child. She is bringing it into the world and will raise it with family help and love. This is truly real family values. As for Palin's lack of political experience, I would submit that her national experience matches up well with Obama's political resume and she isn't running for President! My goodness, what a double standard Ms. Quinn holds. But, of course, in Ms. Quinn's eyes a political savior, like Obama, doesn't need a whit of real world leadership experience [see foreign policy, Sally]. As evident in Quinn's piece the "elite" Washington media will do everything imaginable to bring the Republican ticket down. In this case asserting Palin can't lead due to family concerns. Yes, the expected low blow from a Demo., but one has to think that if Palin were the Democratic nominee, Quinn would be singing her praises to no end as the true feminist ideal.

Posted by: phil20 | September 2, 2008 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Liberals, especially in the media, are so cynical. Why so much anger and hatred? Why has sexism and ageism become acceptable within the media? Now theyre becoming cynical about cynicism...amazing.

Posted by: Bret | September 2, 2008 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin seems like a nice person with a cute family, and has (already) had an incredible life-story. I find her inspiring!

But I am amazed that a sizeable portion of this country believes that that is enough to be President. I accept that Obama is not our most experienced candidate but surely he's been vetted well, after a long and bruising campaign?

Can we afford the risk of a barely-tested person (woman or not) on the ticket - just one heartbeat away from the most powerful office in the world? I am clear in my mind - NO.

Posted by: hoboken | September 2, 2008 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

To the editors of the Washington Post:

Please read this article. This is absolute, undeniable proof that Sally Quinn knows nothing about faith as it relates to this country. In fact, it sounds more like Sally is putting out there an opinion she'd like "the Religious Right" to pick up and run with. She can't even spell Palin's name right in the URL for this blog article!

Oh well, just another Lefty media person scared that McCain just kicked her beloved choice to the curb.

Posted by: Poor Sally | September 2, 2008 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The crux of the argument here is that because Sally Quinn was once not ready to do network news then Palin is not ready to be vice president.

Your cyncism is noted; and time will tell us if it is warranted. Your politics are noted; and they are certainly less insulting than the similiar, but painfully elitist, remarks of Susan Reimer. However, your personal problems are also noted; get a therapist and give her a chance.

It is clear that somehow your inability or ineffectualness is being projected onto Palin. She can raise a family and hold elected office.

She can and she has!

Posted by: j | September 2, 2008 11:27 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Quinn's rant is typical of the countercultural Left. It's a complaint made by an apparently childless & therefore unnatural female who's a voice of the rising culture of death in our society.

Her ideal society would be grotesquely evil and self-destructive.

Posted by: Banshee5 | September 2, 2008 11:27 AM
Report Offensive Comment

And The democrats picked oBama because he is black. I hope your ashamed about that too.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 11:27 AM
Report Offensive Comment

For those of you like me that believe that the overall media (newspapers, cable news, etc) has lost it's true calling of journalism and turned into the PR division of the DNC, isn't it time we said enough already?

We should all be fed up with this and realize that this article doesn't demonstrate journalism, it represents propaganda. Let your voices be heard to the management and owners of these news organizations that enough is enough.

Posted by: Enough Already | September 2, 2008 11:27 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You say Sarah is not prepared for the criticism & scrutiny of being in the White House. Um - didn't you just quote Mrs. Bush as saying nothing can prepare you for that. So if that's the case - what is your point of saying Sarah is not prepared? All of your points are irrlavent since nothing can prepare you for such a thing. You have to just go & do it.

Secondly - the whole "teen pregnancy" thing is pretty funny; that is, its funny who's making an issue of it and why. Fact of the matter is - nearly ALL pregnancy's are not planned or on purpose. And many involve teenage mothers. This is nothing new in any generation. So what's the issue? I could see if the girl decided to use government assistance to raise the baby, and/or the father was unknown or not present - but that's not the case here. Sarah's child, and her family, are not taking liberal/socialist actions here. They're doing what any good, Christian conservative family has done in similar situations. That is to be applauded & commended.

We've got a strong VP candidate (with a strong family & inner & outer circles), with more relavant experience than the Presidential candidate on the other side. This election will be a landslide. Anyone who can't see that is honestly dissillusioned & out of touch with a majority of the American people's realities.

Posted by: Curious | September 2, 2008 11:26 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Carter, Reagan and Clinton, governors all, had no national political experience either, especially in the area of foreign policy. They weren't of Washington either.
Reagan and Clinton had pretty successful presidencies.

EVERY VP pick is a choice made to try to win an election.

Obama has worked less than 150 days in the Senate. That makes him qualified?

The premise that a woman can't hold a job like this and be a mother as well is an insult to every working woman in America.

Posted by: Leon | September 2, 2008 11:26 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Talk about "shock" and "anger". This is another example of how members of the media frame a discussion. Case in Point #1 Take unrelated personal events of their lives and somehow make them relevant to McCain's VP selection (it's really all about me anyway).CIP #2, let's assume it is a political choice. Hey member of the news media; they are all political choices (I'm sure Obama selected Biden because he liked him). CIP #3, stretch to breaking point the bounds of credibility. This writer has to go back to a SB convention statement 8 YEARS AGO to somehow try to nullify the support Palin is getting over running for office and supporting her daughter's choice not abort a baby? Whatever happened to women getting ahead; where are the 60's when you need them?

No wonder newspapers are losing money

Posted by: Danny | September 2, 2008 11:26 AM
Report Offensive Comment

When I interview nurses for jobs at my company, there are several interview questions that are not only crass and taboo, but violations of Federal law. For example, asking a woman if she has personal or home commitments that might interfere with her job. That's a biggie...

It is curious that so many women, like Sally Quinn seem to think that a woman is qualified for any job if she is not too tied down with domestic responsibilities. What happened to the womens liberation movement? Why are women not considered for jobs based upon their qualifications? Is the VP job "man's work". This is really pathetic.

Posted by: John | September 2, 2008 11:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

ive NEVER seen liberals so angry and distressed over a VP pick in my life

must be scared

Posted by: jeremy | September 2, 2008 11:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Your article is ridiculous and baseless. As one of the "Christians" who you think will be offended and not vote for Palin, you could not be more wrong. I was not sure before McCain's selection if I would vote, but now I will. In fact, I even donated money which I have never done before. I convinced my mother to vote for McCain now. Silly Sally - you don't get it. And your "religion" does not appear to be the religion many of us belong to. Oh, and what a sexist comment that the man cannot stay at home. Are you living under a rock or in an ivory tower. This is not journalism. Sarah Palin would know - she was a journalist. How that must get you riled up that one of your own will be the VP.

Posted by: father of 7 | September 2, 2008 11:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I really cannot believe the media's reaction to Palin. I'm utterly astounded. The same people who have for years complained that women are not given the same opportunities as men are now turning and sinking their teeth into Palin. Just because she's a woman, a mother, and a wife doesn't mean that she can't handle the job of VP.

Honestly I wish she were running for President, I'd vote for her in a heartbeat. I'm tired of the same old faces and names floating around Washington. Look at what good all their "experience" has done for us. I hope Palin shakes things up and the media and Washington regulars finally realize real America is tired of the BS.

Posted by: Tim | September 2, 2008 11:25 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Play the cancer card, why don't you? Looks like the Evangelicals are happier than ever with Palin. If I were you, I'd read Drudge Report so that your column won't have to be outdated.

Posted by: Chris G | September 2, 2008 11:24 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"She has no national political experience, especially in the area of foreign policy. "

What national political experience did Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, or Jimmy Carter have? As Govenors, they did not have the foreign policy exeperience either, so why did the country not fall apart under their watch? This is a lame argument. The only real qualification should be leadership ability. Being Govenor of any state shows that quality exists with that person.

Posted by: Bruno T | September 2, 2008 11:24 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This does raise the question whether the conservative right will look at their abstinence only education as very unrealistic and just plain wrong. If you can vote for Palin knowing this, then you should realize that our daughters and sons should be taught the truth about sex and be taught about condoms. And, kids will have sex and you can't stop them. Here is a decent, conservative woman who has probably been a good mother and her daughter had an accident. Was she using birth control (condoms)? Was she taught about birth control? Abstinence only education does not work!

Posted by: Bob | September 2, 2008 11:24 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Up your tight liberal ass.

Posted by: Mary Beth | September 2, 2008 11:23 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I haven't yet gotten over the fact that the Republicans would nominate a 72 year old to be president. Now this? Maybe they need super delegates.

Posted by: C. Toll | September 2, 2008 11:23 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, don't be offended, McCain was not cynical. He found the damned politician he thought was most like himself. That is a reformer, fiscal conservative, and go against your own party when you think you are right person. If he selects Romney, he gets the desired resume, but a slick politician that McCain has made a living by ridiculing. If he picks Huckabee, he gets as big of a liar as Smugsy. If he picks Pawlenty, he potentially pulls an unknown Republican governor from a state that won't likely elect another to replace him. If he selects Hutchinson, he gets a woman with great credentials but a lousy campaigner, who is not known outside of a state that already will vote for McCain. Palin is not your choice, but I think McCain demonstrates that he will make choices that he wants regardless of what you and others want. See what she does. By the way, in the VP debate, Plugsy is in real trouble. THAT is what is suspect bothers you the most.

Posted by: Jim Baker | September 2, 2008 11:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I take it that the childs pregnancy is a BIGGER problem than: Ted Kennedy & Mary Jo, John Kerry shooting an unarmed 17 yr. old in the back, Bill Clinton doing 'who knows' how many women, Robert Byrd's membership in the KKK, Obama's love for the Rev. Wright, Obama association with Ayers, oh, almost forgot about Gary Hart, Barney Frank, Gerry Studds, etc etc etc..... ya, i guess you guys are right(ious) for sure....

Posted by: dp | September 2, 2008 11:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I agree with your comments and analysis. McCain is playing politics while putting in danger the country by first trying to reach a personnal goal to be President, even though he is sick and old, plus picking an unperienced person who obviusly should spend more time with her kids. I think it shows that both McCain and Palin put their personnal/ego goals first and then their families and third the country of United States of America.

Posted by: Carolina | September 2, 2008 11:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"Sally Quinn, a woman who committed adultery with a married man...a woman who broke up his marriage and used her affair to further her own ambitions and career..."

That is exactly what John McCain did. How can you even make an argument like this? Do you really want to bring up John McCain's past actions right now? This is getting ridiculous.

Posted by: What? | September 2, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Well said. Sarah Palin should not be put in the position of
possibly having to negotiate with Russia in the next cold war. This was a very irresponsible pick and anyone that is comfortable with her as a VP is a complete fool who obviously doesn't have the best interests of the country in mind.

Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Blah, blah, blah.....Typical liberal talking points. I am quite sure that John McCain would love to have a discussion about the respective experience level of the two tickets. Especially considering that the #1 person on the liberal ticket is woefully inexperienced.

Posted by: Fake Steve Jobs | September 2, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

HA the liberal women are just angry that their democratci party turned their backs on women ARE SEXISTS and the republicn party will make history with a WOMAN VICE PRESIDENT -- also it is the republican party who hired Condoleeza rice- the democratic party is now known as the SEXIST PARTY

Posted by: former democratic woman in nyc | September 2, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

No foreign policy experience???? I guess making overseeing and making a deal with Canadians on a pipeline doesn't count. But hey don't let the facts get in the way of your analysis.
Its also funny to me how a woman isn't allowed to work if she has kids at home. At least that is exactly what I gather from your paper. Instead let us talk about Obama's neglect to his daughters having been on the campaign trail for the better part of the last two years. HMMM that seems more detrimental than a woman who actually takes care of her kids and works at the same time.
Your analysis is piss poor and reminds me of a catty school girl.

Posted by: Alain | September 2, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"4) 50 % of its population has a 5th grade or lowr education level."

According to the census bureau, there are almost 85% of adults (over age 25) that are high school graduates (lets see, that's 7 grades above fifth grade). Now maybe you manipulated the data by including infants and students in grades 1 through 4, but I still don't think you get to 50%. Kind of similar to what Obama does with statistics. This is only one of your facts that I checked out, but I suspect that they are all equally misleading.

As for bringing up social security, it is the Bush administration that has been pushing for reform to prevent it from running out of money. The Democrats in Congress have fought him at every turn. Here is just a short excerpt from a USA Today story on the issue:

"President Bush said Saturday that Social Security "in on the road to bankruptcy" and unable to pay promised benefits to future generations, raising the stakes in a major political battle with Democrats.

Bush used his weekly radio address to try to build support for his plan to allow workers to divert part of their Social Security payroll taxes into private investment accounts. Democrats accuse him of exaggerating the problem to sell a plan that would scale back Social Security.

Bush said the cost of fixing the system grows larger each year, and he quoted Social Security trustees as saying that waiting just one year would add $600 billion to the price of a solution.

"If we do not act now, government will eventually be left with two choices: dramatically reduce benefits or impose a massive economically ruinous tax increase," the president said. "Leaving our children with such a mess would be a generational betrayal."

The Democrats don't think there is a problem with social security. You seem to forget that the President cannot enact legislation on his own. The democrats in congress don't want to have anything to do with addressing the problem while a Republican is in office. The problem is a demographic problem, the population of folks eligible for social security is growing faster than the population of folks paying taxes. There are only two choices, either reduce benefits or raise taxes. If Obama is elected and given the choice between reducing entitlements and raising taxes, I think I know what will happen.

Posted by: GC | September 2, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I'd rather have less experience in the veep spot than the presidency.

Posted by: Easy there lefty | September 2, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"McCain's pick may not even find support among "family values" voters. "

That's one of the lamest statements I have seen on the coverage of this story. Why would what happens to a parent's child effect what a "family values" voter thinks? (short of that child being a serial killer) The fact this child is keeping the baby shows the major difference between Republicans and Democrats; Republicans admit mistakes and take responsibility for them, Democrats blame others and abort the problem if they can.

Posted by: Steve | September 2, 2008 11:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment

To have Sally Quinn telling us what the conservative evangelical base may or may not accept is about as logical as Rev Wright writing an essay on how much he loves America. Or Bill Clinton writing a book about Staying Honest and Truthful in your Marriage.

Stick to your life inside the Beltway Gala's, Sally. You look like a dam fool when you try to pretend you know what us folks out here in fly over country think and say.

GO Sarah!!

Posted by: SallyIsABigFatLiar | September 2, 2008 11:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

She doesn't have to apply for a position with Kos. She already works with him. How much does Newsweek pay Kos to spout vile rumors about conservatives? Seems you would know since you drink the same kool-aid...

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 11:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Oh my gosh! A politician running for president picked a running mate to "to try to win an election"? Lowly Republican! I'm glad Obama's motives were pure when he chose the older, more experienced, foreign-policy-savvy Biden. Obama is running as an intellectual exercise, not to actually win an election, eh? Brilliant!

Posted by: ralfdude | September 2, 2008 11:19 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, you better go hide in the woods for a while. After reading the comments on your subject about the future Vice President it looks like you didn't make any friends. Mrs. Palin is the ray of light that we have been looking for in politics for a long time. When the Dems found out they couldn't win with Hillary they threw in a black man to try for an edge. What a great history he has!! McCain came up with a winner for a partner and the Dems a loser, so get used to it.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 11:19 AM
Report Offensive Comment

So much for Womens lib, I thought the push was men and women are the same. Now we learn that a womens role is different from a mans. Wonder what we will learn next? Women should stay barefoot and pregnant until they are 60? Of course 5 abortions would have fixed her problem and she wouldn't be punished by Sally.

Posted by: Calvin | September 2, 2008 11:19 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"It is a choice made to try to win an election."

I cannot belive that got past your editors.

First Prize for the blindingly obvious analysis awards of 2008.

Posted by: James N. Ward | September 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Was Obama nominated because he is black or was Hillary Clinton so close to being nominated because she is a woman? Why do you assume the defining characteristics of this pick are her ovaries? There is substance there is you take the time and effort to objectively look. Sounds like a self-imposed glass ceiling.

Posted by: Andy | September 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

We will win BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

We lost the last two Presidential elections.

WE WILL NOT LOSE THIS ONE

NO MATTER WHAT WE HAVE TO SAY.

Posted by: Consumate Liberal | September 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Of course, Sally Quinn wasn't ready for 'reporting at the Washington Post,' either--given the details of her famous job interview with Benjamin Bradlee who, looking her up and down and evaluating her blank resume, cheerfully remarked, 'Nobody's perfect' (see memoirs by Quinn and Bradlee). Is it the new feminist position that women are different from men and should stay at home and take care of the kids? Interesting ...

Posted by: Philip Terzian | September 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You are an elitist!

Posted by: lawdevil | September 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I just have to say that as a conservative it's extremely frustrating to have to hear from every news source about the pregnancy situation with Governor Palin's daughter while a few weeks ago no one had anything to report on John Edward's extramarital affair and illegitmate child. How can you possibly justify this kind of news coverage?

Posted by: Brian (TX) | September 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I am outraged concerning the slandering of Gov Palin’s daughter. Yes the child will need her parents support. However, the support she will need is emotional.

In 1971, when I was 19 years old I became pregnant. I was barely 20 years old when I gave birth to my child. I was not married.

I was the one that sinned not my parents. My father kicked me out and I had to live with my grandmother. The only help I needed was a sitter when I went to work. Emotional support was needed the most.

What Sara’s daughter needs most of all is forgiveness and for her family to stand by her emotionally and to be shown love.

As for Sara not looking pregnant at six months. I did not have to wear maternity clothes until I was 7 months.

Posted by: S Fritz | September 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I can't believe what I'm reading in this story. Oh, I get it now- On Faith w/Jon and Sally includes all religions- like the DEM party and their Messiah candidate. If the Chosen One had selected a woman VP candidate then all would be well.

To insinuate whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother because her 17 year old got pregnant is just insane. No parent can watch their kids 24/7. This is most parents nightmare but, newsflash, kids do have premarital sex. Due to this fact, a young girl can become pregnant.

Two things in closing-
1) If the 17 year old had an abortion then all would be well, right? No pregnancy, no story... Actually, this scenario would probably attract some on the left- "she's one of us!"

2) If a man wrote this piece can you imagine the outcry? But if a liberal woman author, writing under the guise of "faith" writes it, then all is okay.

Posted by: disappointed and disgusted with Sally | September 2, 2008 11:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Tired of Hipocrisy wrote: "It's tragic to think that this election will be decided by the type of hate mongers who have posted so many replies here.

Sally Quinn wrote a non-vitriolic, non hate mongering piece to make people think, and immediately the knives of the conservative right come out."

Dear Tired of Hypocrisy,

It's not even noon yet.
What are you smoking?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 2, 2008 11:17 AM
Report Offensive Comment

since public schools now teach all about sex including gay relationships to babies in pre school what else does a child growing up have to think about. certainly not book learning. only the sex education which is pushed down their throats.
this young woman is not the first and will not be the last.
at least the fellow is going to marry her. not running(hopefully) to another girl and impregnating her as done by many in this country.
why do gays decide they need a child.
the world is crazy.

Posted by: anne | September 2, 2008 11:17 AM
Report Offensive Comment

When Sarah Palin suddently appeared on TV, I was immediately reminded of Elle Woods.

In the movie, Legally Blond, Elle was a blond, giddy sorority girl type who implausibly was admitted to Harvard Law School and won a sensational murder case before graduating or passing the Massachusetts bar.

Elle was played by beautiful and blond Reese Witherspoon while Sarah Palin, a brunette, played herself on the news as a hockey mom from Alaska. being implausibly named as the "next vice president of the United States" by U.S. Senator John McCain.

A delightful movie and a charming Mrs. Palin, but ....if Senator McCain wins November 4th, Mrs. Palin would be a heart beat away from a president that is getting up in years and has had numerous bouts with cancer.

Implausible, but legally brunette.

Posted by: Ron Johnson | September 2, 2008 11:17 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't have anything particularly against Palin or her family; a teenage pregnancy can happen in any family and we should mind our own business. I do however think that it might be worth asking if everyone would be as forgiving if it was Obama who had an unmarried teenage daughter. I suspect if that was the case we'd be hearing about how it shows the Obama family doesn't have good values.

Posted by: bendra | September 2, 2008 11:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What an utterly insulting op-ed. Sally seems to have an incredibly low opinion of both women and men(she doesn't thing Mr. Palin can take care of the family during that 3AM phone call?)


And judging Palin by Quinn's experience--now that is absurd.

Posted by: Working woman | September 2, 2008 11:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Mrs. Bradley,
You once again prove that your only claim to fame was in marrying Ben Bradlee. Your lack of knowledge of how and why evangelicals think, let alone anyone of strong faith, is very evident. Possibly if you had a strong faith and had children of your own, you would see things differently. Stick to having parties and acting like the socialite and pseudo-intellectual you think you are.
J. Kingfish

Posted by: kingfish | September 2, 2008 11:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Mrs. Bradley,
You once again prove that your only claim to fame was in marrying Ben Bradlee. Your lack of knowledge of how and why evangelicals think, let alone anyone of strong faith, is very evident. Possibly if you had a strong faith and had children of your own, you would see things differently. Stick to having parties and acting like the socialite and pseudo-intellectual you think you are.
J. Kingfish

Posted by: kingfish | September 2, 2008 11:15 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Panic is what I see. Ha Ha.

Posted by: michael thomas | September 2, 2008 11:15 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally - After reading this "article" I was so motivated to write a comment telling you how pathetic you sound...But after reading a few of the other reader's comments, I see that has already been accomplished! Glad to see the readers of this site are on to you...Maybe you should apply for a position with the kos!

Posted by: Bill White | September 2, 2008 11:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally, your evangelical nutcase audience is taking you to the farm on this one! However, while I am a proud liberal Democratic supporter of Senators Obama and Biden, I respect a reasonable, intelligent and non-fanatical religious perspective on issues of the day. Your position on the good Governor from Alaska is clearly just that, reasoned, somewhat tormented but the kind of questioning in which a good reported must be engaged!

Stick to your guns, don't be intimidated by the nutcases. A voice of reason in the evangelical community is well over do!

Posted by: Sheldon Kaye | September 2, 2008 11:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sally is in the tank for Obama. Sh fails to understand a few facts like Obama has no experience running anything, he is not an economist, nor a military man, nor a foreign policy expert. He is nothing but a lawyer with no experience except as an old time politician from Chicago. As a businessman responsible for 100 employees and a $100M company, Obama terrifies me. He has no comprehension of what makes business work and who actually employees people. Remember that Limo liberals always talk about what they will require of others but they are above it all. They must keep people poor and uneducated to have something to hold over their head. They have to do this to hold power which is what it is all about. They love welfare, Medicare, social security and any other government program which affords them the opportunity to threaten people. They just can't tolerate self sufficient people who can't be bought.

Posted by: Byron Allen | September 2, 2008 11:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't know how you can write that it is clearly a cynical move on McCain's part to select Palin. If in time it becomes clear that McCain didn't think Palin could do an excellent job, if it becomes clear he doesn't respect her judgment, her leadership qualities and intelligence, if it turns out that McCain would rather have selected a different running mate but decided to throw a bone to the roiled up females of the US of A, well then I suppose you could write that McCain made a cynical selection. But, until evidence is provided to support YOUR assumptions, the only person you have truly cast as a base cynic is yourself.

Which is probably fine with you and apparently apropos. In the meantime you should try to stop being so sensitive to your vulnerabilities, it reeks of weakness. And consider two things:

1. This election will surely be historic no matter who gets elected. And McCain at least deserves praise for that. There will be no refuge party for small minded individuals hoping to block either of these remarkable individuals from becoming one of the leaders of our nation. A less cynical person might be given pause by this.

2. No Republican VP selection is likely to have made you any happier than Palin. But would you ever consider the idea that Barack Obama was selected by dent of his skin color? A cynical view might be that he used his skin color to gain votes, by aligning himself with historical figures and disallowing others to use such touchstones, and possibly even more cynical behaviors might be attributed to him. BUT I HOPE we can all agree that is absurd. Barrack is who he is, and is imminently qualified to be the DNC selection for President. If we can look past Barrack's skin color to see the quality of the individual than I think we should do the same at least for Palin.

I may not agree with everything Palin says, but there is no reason for me to demean her as a being selected solely for her gender.

In the end I would suspect no-less Machiavellian machinations were compelling Obama to not select another minority individual as his running mate.

If you can't look that in the face honestly than you don't deserve to have a podium for your views.

Posted by: g | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"They chose me because they wanted a woman. I didn't even want the job, but I didn't feel I could turn it down. Of course it was a disaster. I lasted four months. I wasn't ready for Network TV."

And now? What are you now Sally?

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you, Sally, for your insightful and well written article. I appreciated your adding a personal dimension with your own experience in not being ready for a particular job. With Palin so new to everyone, this is on the mind of many people, I suspect.

Posted by: MarkM | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Why is it that people that seemingly know how to characterize "evangelicals" always get us wrong?

How dare you determine how she raises her children. This is so condescending and typical of the left.

Posted by: Gumby | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"These are dangerous and trying times for the entire world. This is no time to to play gender politics. The stakes are too high. And given McCain's age and history of health issues, the stakes for choosing a qualified vice presidential candidate have never been higher."

And neither is it a time for race politics. And if the stakes for choosing a VP have never been higher, what about the stakes for choosing a President? Obama's lack of experience is breathtaking, and his judgment is highly questionable.

Palin may have a mere 2 years of executive experience as a governor, but that is 2 more years than either Obama or Biden have.

The intellectual dishonesty of Ms Quinn's commentary is striking. There is not a shred of objectivity in the article. A serious disappointment, indeed.

Posted by: Jim M. | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama's pick of Biden was just as cynical as McCain's, calculated to buttress his two biggest weaknesses: An obvious lack of experience and an inability to connect with blue-collar voters.

So save the indignant routine, eh? You're covering politics - where politicians make political calculations for political reasons.

Posted by: John Bankston | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Please explain how your inability to handle a co-anchoring position with CBS has any relevance to a VP candidate who has successfully called her own party to task.

This candidate has appeal to me if she'll challenge Republicans on the Hill who have been spending like drunken Democrats.

Posted by: Rand | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Soooo, Sally...

How are these responses going for you?

I'll bet you are "shocked" that 99.9% of the respondees here think you are totally out of touch... or that you are a panicked shill for the Obama ticket.

My hope would be that these responses would give you a clue, but, I don't think that will happen. I'm sure you still think you are right and all of us are misguided.

Luckily, we get to vote.

Posted by: TexGEOas | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

LT369, as the chair of the FRC, Biden was not only dealing with foreign policy from the Senate, but traveled abroad to do so as well. Look up his extensive travels to the Balkans in the 1990s.

This article, to me, is only another illustration of the destructive nature of neocon "christian family values;" prevent birth control at all cost, preach abstinence, et cetera.

I cannot in good conscience support someone whose personal values stand against birth control pills, condoms, ecology, and the scientific method.

Posted by: Tomas | September 2, 2008 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Your article fails to mention that Obams'a senatorial experience consists of his 143 days on the job. Is this his qualification to be president?

Posted by: Paul | September 2, 2008 11:11 AM
Report Offensive Comment

It's tragic to think that this election will be decided by the type of hate mongers who have posted so many replies here.

Sally Quinn wrote a non-vitriolic, non hate mongering piece to make people think, and immediately the knives of the conservative right come out.

The question is whether or not this woman is able to lead a nation. Can she speak with authority on world issues, challenge rouge operatives within an administration, hold her ground on national security issues and tell the President he is wrong or getting bad advice? What will she use and whom will she count on to give her the truth?

The Christian right has done a 180 one this and the lies are showing. Had this been a Democratic pick, they would be braying like wounded jackasses at the lack of integrity and poor choice. Pat Robertson would be joining his fellow charlatans in calling for nationwide days of prayer to smite the ticket for having such a godless sinner. James Dobson would be railing from the pulpit. And Rush would be calling them every name in the book. Instead, just as he has given McCain's adultery and his wife's substance abuse a pass, he and the others are turning a blind eye and silent tongue here.

John McCain pandered on this one. Time will tell if the American public is willing to risk our future and that of the world on his single focus...to become President, whatever the cost to our nation.

Posted by: Tired of the hypocrisy | September 2, 2008 11:11 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This is quite possibly the most sexist article I have ever read in my whole life.

Posted by: Ryan | September 2, 2008 11:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Many folks apparently think of "evangelicals" as a bunch of straight-laced, judgemental Bible thumper's and therefore misjudge our reactions. We understand that all have missed the mark, there is none righteous, not one. We know that but for the grace of God, we are capable of any sin as well.

Sarah Palin is exactly what we need,honest,forth-right, not a political insider, and conservative on social issues. In the weeks to come you will see she should not be underestimated in how well she connects with regular folks across all genders and races.

A real person! What a breath of fresh air!

Posted by: steve | September 2, 2008 11:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Sally,

Why all the concern for the Republican party. Not exactly your first choice when it comes to voting now is it? Me thinks thou do protest too much. If Palin is such a transparently poor choice for VEEP then why are Democratic operatives dumping all over her? I think the Dems are scared.

Posted by: dhart1949 | September 2, 2008 11:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I may not agree with women being in leadership roles that usurp the authority of men but I do believe that when men do not step up to the plate and have the leadership qualities needed to lead then women certainly will take up where the men left off. Compare her to Obama and she is by far a more appealing candidate. Obama has no experience, "JUST WORDS". She has executive experience and unlike Obama's "JUST WORDS", she has proven herself in her own State of Alaska. She may be obscure in the eyes of Americans but so was Bill Clinton--who ever heard of him outside of Arkansas when he ran for President? Whoever heard of Obama outside of the Senate or Illinois? I certainly hadn't but that hasn't stopped them from becoming household names. Should that be a factor for Palin? Only the media wants to bring these talking points to the forefront when it is a Republican. If she were a Democrat we wouldn't be discussing the issues. She would be praised for being able to juggle her homelife and physically challenged child with her career and that would be proof enough that she was ready to lead. But no, since she is a Republican, the media must raise concern on how can she juggle these duties? The liberals are dripping with hypocrisy that it makes one sick.

Posted by: Alena | September 2, 2008 11:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman"
and he obviously told you this. Sorry but maybe you're projecting yourself into this mix. You might have picked someone because they had a vagina but simply using your noggin you can see that McCain sees himself in Palin. They are both Mavericks. They have taken on their parties they have fought corruption they have reached across the aisle for bipartisan support. Hmm perhaps he picked someone that enhanced his message. But unfortunately you've been playing identity politics so long the first thing you see is a vagina and can't get past it.
Why don't you go back and do some critical thinking and get back to us when you can stop defining actions and people by their genitalia.

Posted by: Alain Hamblet | September 2, 2008 11:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Your article is slanted on so many levels. Your angst against Gov. is not that she is inexperienced, it is that she is a Conservative, Christian, Pro-life candidate. What happened with the feminist rally that you can have it all--profession and family. This is a principaled woman who was NOT going to destroy a child because it was either physically challenged or "inconvenient". The fact that she has successfully juggled family and leadership roles as mayor and Governor shows that she is qualified to lead. Much more so than Senator Obama who has not held ANY executive position. In fact, his dossier is skewed given his many questionable alliances with radical preachers and the leader of the Weathermen. So, who should we more leery of?

Posted by: Diane | September 2, 2008 11:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Mrs. Quinn, you just don't get it. As a woman, you do not speak for me. I am not at all insulted by McCain's pick of Sarah Palin. I am insulted by you. She & I have share the same values. You cannot understand why conservative women would support her because you do not share our values. I am fine with that, but why do you have to insult us? It seems as if you are afraid of something.
Your "negatives" about Palin are laughable. You mentioned Barbara Bush's comment "nothing can prepare you for the criticism & scrutiny of the being in the White House". That applies to anyone (Obama, Biden, & McCain), not just Palin. "A mother's role is different than a father's"...that's true, but what does that really mean? A father cannot be the comforter or the primary care giver? Why aren't you asking the same thing about Obama and his children? Why is it ok for a man with young children to aspire to the White House, but not a woman. That seems sexist. You libs claim to be for equal rights, but you don't walk the walk.

Posted by: texas wife & mom | September 2, 2008 11:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

To review: it's ok for blacks to vote for Obama because he's black, but not ok for women to vote for Palin because she's a woman.

Posted by: Matt | September 2, 2008 11:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

You are an embarassement to your profession.

Posted by: Tony | September 2, 2008 11:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Your article fails to point out that Obama's senatorial experience consists of his 143 work days on the job. Is this his qualification to be president?

Posted by: paul | September 2, 2008 11:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn:

Your "shock" comes from the fact that Sarah Palin already looks like a winner that stole the carefully choreographed show prepared by the Democratic Party. Mr. Obama is less qualified and less accomplished for the office her runs for than she is. He promises things that he has not deliver in the past while she already has a record of accomplishment in cutting government waste and curtailing government corruption.

The sooner you realize the root cause of your "shock" the better for your recovery. So, please, stop trying to find substitute causes, like her daughter's pregnancy. Besides, don't you think that going after family of a candidate is a lowly thing to do? When people criticized Mr. Obama's wife, all the Democrat-leaning media cried "Leave her alone". So why do you think it's OK to do to a Republican what's hateful to a Democrat? Do you think people don't see a double standard here?

Posted by: A Reader | September 2, 2008 11:07 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't consider this mess Palin's fault. I lay it at the feet of John McCain and the GOP who showed reckless abandon for truly vetting the VP nominee for the American people, not to mention little concern for Palin's family and her future.

I hope Palin is wise enough to look at the landscape and withdraw, leaving John McCain and his out of touch cronies to stew in their own juices.

Posted by: laurie | September 2, 2008 11:07 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Obama(and his friends in the press) asked Palin to the prom and she said no. And now they're mad.

Posted by: jaykay vers. 2.56 | September 2, 2008 11:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Perhaps you need to spend some time in flyover country. The Palin choice is being very well recieved here in Southern Illinois. Not only is her executive experience greater than any of the candidates in the race, she is honest, and her positions on all the important issues are consistently correct and based on logic. We Illinoisans know Barack Obama for the carpet bagger he is. Reverend Wright,Emil Jones, Tony Rezko,almost 200 present votes in the state legislature,the Jack Ryan Affair, and Alan Keyes all really happened here. Obama's record of accomplishment is pathetically thin. He is a clever opportunist who can really read a teleprompter. His concept of central government has been tried and has failed everywhere it has been attempted.

Posted by: David A. Hopkins | September 2, 2008 11:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I totally agree with you. I'm a mother of seven, a Christian, Republican and prolife. My heart aches for the Palen family. Whether man or woman this family needs both parents to be there for the special needs child and now the teen daughter and the new grandbaby. I am at a loss as to whether I can vote for the McCain Palen ticket. I am also surprised at the evangelical response. We have always put family first in any decision we make. Anti-abortion is not the only test for leading our country. While I cannot vote for Obama I'm hoping Sarah Palen will step aside for a more qualified person.

Posted by: Rae | September 2, 2008 11:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Note to author: Most, if not all, Governors do not have foreign policy experience! Bill Clinton didn't. George W. Bush did not. It's insulting that the liberal media will not look at the fact that Mrs. Palin has Executive experience that demonstrates her ability to lead and to govern. In case you don't remember, Alaska is a state of our great nation. Hence, national experience. Get over your anger that Hillary wasn't picked and give McCain some credit for choosing a polished leader that happens to be a woman.

We are proud of you Sarah!!!!

Posted by: Women for McCain | September 2, 2008 11:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn,

I read your biased and vicious article in the Post this morning and, frankly, I am puzzled. It left me with these questions:

1. If Mrs. Palin ewere an abortion supporter, would you be so opposed to her candidacy?
2. If Mrs. Palin were a black woman, would you have the guts to print a similar diatribe against her?
3. Do you think if Mr. Obama were white there would be this adulation and bias such a we have seen in the media?
4. Do you think the DNC would have picked Mr. Obama if he were white? Do you not think that the reason for Mr. Obama's selection by the DNC was because there was no viable democrat candidate?
5. How can you point out Mrs. Palin lack of experience when I am sure you are aware that Mr. Obama chose Mr. Biden to counterbalance his lack of experience? Yes, I know he a U.S. Senator but
look at his voting record.
6. Were you suggesting that if Mrs. Palin were a stay-at-home mother her daughter would not have become pregnant? If so, you are either so naive, which I think you are not, or you are hell bent on destroying this woman.
7. I do not know if you printed "your opinion" when Mr. Obama showed a lack of judgment in the Rev. Wright incident so I cannot take you to task for that. But I would be interested to know the answer to that question.
8. What has happened to the compassion and support women used to have for each other? That one is rhetorical, of course.
Thank you.
Helen Saunders
Age 72
Longwood, FL

Posted by: Helen Saunders | September 2, 2008 11:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

My Lord, the democrats have really lost it on this comment list.

"I don't see how anyone who was President of her PTA can be seen as capable of being POTUS"

Really? You want to go with that? Don't want to mention the fact that she is GOVERNOR of Alaska? LOL, LMFAO. Okay then, I don't believe Obama who is just a community organizer could be POTUS. Fair is fair.

Again, SHE ISN'T RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. She is running for Vice President, idiots.

Keep on with the experience attacks. It is becoming painfully clear that Obama is less experienced than Palin and is running for POTUS!


Posted by: Ryan from Cali | September 2, 2008 11:05 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Perhaps you need to spend some time in flyover country. The Palin choice is being very well recieved here in Southern Illinois. Not only is her executive experience greater than any of the candidates in the race, she is honest, and her positions on all the important issues are consistently correct and based on logic. We Illinoisans know Barack Obama for the carpet bagger he is. Reverend Wright,Emil Jones, Tony Rezko,almost 200 present votes in the state legislature,the Jack Ryan Affair, and Alan Keyes all really happened here. Obama's record of accomplishment is pathetically thin. He is a clever opportunist who can really read a teleprompter. His concept of central government has been tried and has failed everywhere it has been attempted.

Posted by: David A. Hopkins | September 2, 2008 11:05 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Dear Ms. Quinn:

Your "shock" comes from the fact that Sarah Palin already looks like a winner that stole the carefully choreographed show prepared by the Democratic Party. Mr. Obama is less qualified and less accomplished for the office her runs for than she is. He promises things that he has not deliver in the past while she already has a record of accomplishment in cutting government waste and curtailing government corruption.

The sooner you realize the root cause of your "shock" the better for your recovery. So, please, stop trying to find substitute causes, like Sarah's daughter's pregnancy. Besides, don't you think that going after family of a candidate is a lowly thing to do? When people criticized Mr. Obama's wife, all the Democrat-leaning media cried "Leave her alone". So why do you think it's OK to do to a Republican what's hateful to a Democrat? Do you think people don't see a double standard here?

Posted by: A Reader | September 2, 2008 11:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

There are a lot of women that do not hold your views. Your ego has entered this debate and your jealous remarks indicate a lack of understanding of some of this countries most influential women. Keep attacking. It is working for Mccain and Palin.

Posted by: Pat | September 2, 2008 11:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I dont think the country can afford Baracks history of questionable judgement having learned it all from his spiritual mentor for the past 20+ years.... Whereas WE CAN deal with an underage pregnancy...

Posted by: concerned | September 2, 2008 11:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Now we know we pick the right lady!

Keep trembling Ms Quinn. . .

SanFran Nan Marches with NAMBLA and says the church is open to abortion! - Snarf. ..

Obama votes three times to allow doctors (or anyone else) to murder newborns who somehow survive abortion attempts - Sweet!

Obama launches his campaign from a guys living room who is proud to have bombed the Capital! - Oh yeah, and the Hate Whitie stuff for twenty years! - We couldn't make this stuff up!

Just because you have the letters R.E.L.I.G.I.O.N connected on your website doesn't mean very much does it?

Sally your a Dimrod.

Posted by: Laugh | September 2, 2008 11:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Please read Judges chapters 6-9 in the Bible and see how God brought a farmer into a position of leadership. Not only did God select Gideon with no experience as a warrior, but He led and enabled him to accomplish God's purposes. God knew Gideon's heart and also knew that what was to follow would fulfill His purposes and bring glory to God. I see striking comparisons between Sarah Palin and leadership that God often chose and worked through in the Old Testament.

Posted by: Gary Meier | September 2, 2008 11:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"Family Values" voters should have much more concern about McCain than Palin and her daughter. Personally, I'm having a really hard time reconciling the fact that John McCain is an adulterer. It has been well-established that after returning from Vietnam, he met the future Cindy McCain, began a relationship with her while still married to the woman who had been at home raising his kids while he was a POW. Having become infatuated with Cindy, John McCain left his wife and kids and filed for divorce. He married Cindy McCain only a couple of months after his divorce was finalized. So based on my reading of Jesus' teachings on divorce, John McCain is an adulterer and continues to this day to live in this sin. I just can't get past that. At least Bill Clinton and John Edwards didn't leave their lawfully wedded spouse and kids to run off with their tramps. And I know it has been several years since this happened, but as far as I know sin doesn't have a statute of limitations.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008 11:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I remember when I was 17. My parents dragging me out of parties at 2:00am. Neither my mother or father drink and they didn't want me drinking, but at 17 I thought I was invincible. I got drunk with my friends one night and was involved in a pretty severe car accident. Not because I wasn't taught right, it was because of my own bad decissions. I was taught right. I just didn't follow the teachings. I would say that's how I view Bristol Palin. She was taught, but didn't follow her parents teachings.

Posted by: Al-in-Indy | September 2, 2008 11:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Another real problem with her suitability to be Vice President is her former affiliation with the Alaska separatist movement party. This has been reported by ABC News on their website, as a headline yesterday and as part of another story today.

Posted by: Christimarie | September 2, 2008 11:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What an elitist snob Sally Quinn is - I guess the only good female candidate is a snob liberal pro abortionist like herself ....

Posted by: Ed DeLucie | September 2, 2008 11:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

How hypocritical of you. Without doubt, if the parties were reversed and Barack had named a VP candidate with identical family issues you would be enraged if a conservative commentator dared to presume that a woman could not handle family and career issues at the same time. You would probably try to have said commentator fired for 'hate speech' or at a minimum sent for diversity reeducation. Get real.

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008 11:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn, you really need to venture from your Georgetwon townhouse more often. Spend some time at Potomac Mills rather than the shops along M Street - you'll be amazed at what you learn, good and bad. You are, simply put, just out of touch with the middle class values that Gov. Palin exemplifies. And she has more executive experience than Sen. Obama. But I'm afraid, that for people of your ilk, being editor of the Harvard Law Review is far more important (in part because you probably know other former editors) than running a small town or even a state.

And that says a lot more about you than it does Gov. Palin.

Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008 11:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment


Sally,

This article is a pure hit piece!

You covered all the smear points but you really smear yourself and the rest of your colleagues.

Not a particle of logic in it. Just irrational liberal panic.

It's Obama's background and experience you should direct your fear toward. You "journalists" haven't even gotten to Bill Ayers yet. You DO plan to inform your readers about Barack Obama and Bill Ayers, don't you?

We'll know how honest you are when we read about Obama and Ayers in your column.

Waiting...

Posted by: TexGEOas | September 2, 2008 11:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

As a Christian woman I find your comments to be demeaning to both women and men. Todd Palin has made it clear he intends to be the primary caregiver for their children during the VP term. Was it wrong for Kennedy, Carter and Clinton to run for president when they had small children? The country was content to know there was a primary caregiver in mom. Are you saying that men are less loving or nurturing than women, making Todd Palin unable to parent his children and care for their infant son's special needs? Or are you saying that Kennedy, Carter & Clinton were bad, uninvolved fathers for being president while they had small children? Seems to me there's a huge hole in your argument that demeans the maternal/paternal soul. Todd Palin made his decision for his family. Is he only a man, head of his household if he makes a paycheck? How demeaning to reduce a husband's role in the family to nothing more than an ATM machine.

As for foreign experience, Sarah Palin is the Commander in Chief for the Alaskan National Guard - which has troops in the Middle East. (How many troops have Obama and Biden commanded? Hmmm... that would be none.) In fact she went to Kuwait in 2007 to visit her troops, then went to Germany to visit wounded troops. (How many troops in Germany did Obama visit this past summer? Hmmm... that would be none.) Alaska has major trade dealings with Canada (another country, btw, in case you were wondering.) They share major trade ports. Alaska is a stone's throw from Russia. Then there's the whole Alaska oil issue and international implications. Palin has been a mayor and a governor. Already that gives her more executive experience than Obama who would be president - not a heartbeat away. Have poltics become so elitist that the only qualification needed is to appear on Meet the Press?

Shame on you for such a poorly researched article - and most of all, shame on you for demeaning a man's ability to be a Christian, caring parent to his children.

Posted by: Cathy | September 2, 2008 11:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

jealous? perhaps your own failures leads you to not believe in Sarah Palin's ability to handle the job of VP and family. Get over her daughter's pregnancy also. you belittle young single mothers everywhere, and most are typically democrats looking for handouts.

Posted by: tws | September 2, 2008 11:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

So, if Obama chose Hillary has his vp, that would be fine?

Posted by: Tony | September 2, 2008 11:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Sarah Palin's candidacy presents more of a problem to liberals than it does conservatives. We all sometimes wonder how a mother does all that a mother does. But, they do it. Liberals champion these accomplishments in the poor single mother who works mulitple jobs to provide for her family all the while shouting that she cannot do this alone, she must have help from her government. (The liberals are doing the shouting, not the mother - she's just doing it.) And that mother poses no danger to the liberals, because their own policies are designed to keep her where she is, in a cycle of poverty, not allowed to use her strengths and abilities to rise above her station under her own power. They can always point to her as an example of the need for and success of their own failed "poverty busting" programs - the same programs that produce generation after generation of individuals whose spirits are smothered beneath the great mother hen wing of social engineering. The pro-abortion liberals say that women cannot reach their greatest heights with children in tow, and must therefore be allowed to eliminate them in the name of equality.
Now, Sarah Palin is proving in a big way that children are not a deterrent to a woman becoming all that she can be, and, of all the horrors that can be inflicted upon liberal womanhood, she will say that motherhood is the greatest height to which a woman can rise, and that all the rest - governorship, vice presidency - are secondary accomplishmments achieved along the way.
The problem that Sarah Palin presents to liberals is that she is about to disprove the myths that liberal women have been trying to pass off as fact for years. You can "bring home the bacon, fry it up in the pan, go to work in the White House, and take over for the number one man!"

Posted by: Dennis Manor | September 2, 2008 11:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

And mr obama was not chosen simply because he is black was he? And biden was not chosen simply because there had to be someone who could recall the party line backwards and forwards. Look- SHUT UP- the voters will decide we like her, and toss a few more cheap scum liberals aside to unclutter the highway ofr progress!!

Posted by: ralpherus | September 2, 2008 11:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

This "lack of family values" talking point is such an empty argument. What is more family values oriented - aborting the child, or getting married and having the child?

And the constant comparisons between Obama and Palin - keep it up! She really does have more experience than Obama - she beats him hands down in years in elected office and executive experience. (PS- she's not the presidential nominee either).

Posted by: Eric | September 2, 2008 11:00 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil. Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well".

Hmmm... by this logic, no woman with a child or two could ever hold office for 20-25 years of her adult life! So I guess a woman's place is at home?

Posted by: nada | September 2, 2008 11:00 AM
Report Offensive Comment

i find it incredulous for the attacks maby "conservatives" against reporters for raising questions, while at the same time questions are raised about obama's past. i'm a centrist and was waiting to see where mccain went with his pick. i was impressed at first, but i'm afraid proper vetting did not occur. with what's coming to light, i'm afraid he made a poor choice.

he did not put america first. he put himself first.


Posted by: next | September 2, 2008 10:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Apparently, Sally, neither your "faith" nor your "religious scholarship" includes defending the sanctity of life for babies in the womb.

Posted by: freddie mac | September 2, 2008 10:59 AM