Sally Quinn
Washington Post reporter

Sally Quinn

Washington Post journalist and author of several books, Quinn is founder and (with Jon Meacham) co-moderator of On Faith.

 ALL POSTS

Blame Hasan, not Islam

Devout Muslim kills 13
Psychiatrist kills 13
Disgruntled army officer kills 13
Disappointed bachelor kills 13
Grieving son kills 13
Weird loner kills 13
Deranged person kills 13

Which is it? After Maj. Nidal M. Hasan allegedly went on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood last week, any of those headlines would have been accurate. When James von Brunn went on a shooting rampage at the Holocaust museum earlier this year, was it because he was a Christian, a white supremacist, a bitter loser or a nut case? When Jason Rodriguez allegedly shot and killed one co-worker and wounded five others in Orlando last week, was it because he was Catholic, Hispanic, a disgruntled ex-employee or just crazy?

There's no excuse for what Hasan allegedly did, but there are explanations. "He must have snapped," Hasan's aunt said when she heard about Ford Hood. But why did Hasan snap? Was it because he was still mourning the loss of both parents at a relatively early age? Had he been traumatized by trying to deal with the post-traumatic stress syndrome of the patients he was treating, or because he was against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or because he didn't think he could get a discharge? Maybe he snapped because he was being harassed for being a Muslim in the U.S. military.

My point is that many factors were involved in each of these horrendous shootings. So why in this care are so many people blaming or even questioning Islam itself for the actions of one disturbed individual?

Many Muslim groups here and abroad have condemned the Fort Hood shootings as immoral, illegal and cowardly. Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt, declared to On Faith that the shootings violated Islamic law. Hasan's actions seems to have had much to do with his personal religious beliefs, but we cannot indict an entire faith for the distorted and disturbed thoughts and actions of one individual.

First, there are a number of issues that are relevant to the Fort Hood shootings that have nothing to do with religion. Certainly the military has a lot to answer for. How in God's name did they ever let this guy study to be a psychiatrist and actually treat people when by all accounts his colleagues refused to send patients to him. The lack of adequate psychiatric care in the military, particularly for post-traumatic stress syndrome, is shocking. Who and where were Hasan's medical and military supervisors? Are they being called to task?

As for religion, what should we make of reports that Hasan was harassed because of his religion and heritage? On one occasion, a diaper reportedly was left in his car with a note saying "That's your headdress." Another time, someone drew a camel on his car with a note saying "Camel jockey get out." It has been clear for years that evangelical and fundamentalist Christians have enormous influence in the military and have been allowed to proselytize, from the military academies to the battlefield. How much of a role did the military's evangelical subculture play on Hasan's state of mind? There should be a zero tolerance policy in the military for religious proselytizing and harassment. One strike and you're out, not only for those who are guilty of that sort of harassment, but also for those who tolerate or condone.

It is difficult, after 9/11, for many Americans to see Muslims who commit atrocities as anything but Muslims. Just look at some of the comments on the blogs. One person went so far as to suggest that we round up all of the Muslims in this country and put them in detention camps like we did the Japanese American citizens during world Ward II . Over the past two days I have heard a number of intelligent, well-educated and open-minded people allude to the fact that Hasan had equated suicide bombers with heroes, talked openly about his feelings against the wars, and expressed his belief's that they were anti-Muslim wars. "Who are we kidding,?" said one person. "This is an act of a Muslim terrorist."

It may be equally difficult for many mainstream Muslim Americans, mostly educated and affluent middle-class citizens, to admit that Hasan's faith might have had something to do with the Fort Hood killing spree. I wish we all were more evolved, but I'm afraid it is still impossible to separate out one's religion, background, color, looks or name from how one is perceived in America. Even though Hasan's background seems to be as American as apple pie -- his father immigrated to this country at the age of 16, Hasan was born and raised here and belonged to the U.S. military -- he was still perceived by many as simply a Muslim.

Clearly the truth is more complicated than that.

By Sally Quinn  |  November 9, 2009; 1:45 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: An act of bad faith | Next: Religious fanaticism is the issue, not religion

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



If Sally Quinn can't figure out that Hasan is a terrorist, then I'd call her IQ into question.
Call it what it is lady. The guy has contacts a Jihadist Muslim and yells, "God is Great" and then kills American soldiers on American soil.
I was you on O'Reilly and you looked like an absolute idiot.
But then again, we all know the Post is in the White House's pocket as long as it's a Democratic Administration...Our own President won't call it what it is, so why would you?

Posted by: syjererea | November 15, 2009 4:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Quinn.
Is Islam considered one of the world's great religions because of the large number of followers it has worldwide, most of whom are illiterate?
Is Islam considered one of the world's great religions because of the many Islamic medical facilities that are open to help people of all religions around the world? (None in the USA)
Is Islam considered one of the world's great religions because of the civil rights Islam extends to its women and female children? Like the female children locked in a gated school that was on fire and who burned to death because they wanted to leave the burning building without their burqua's?
Is Islam considered one of the world's great religions because a Muslim father is allowed to bury 3 of his female children alive in Pakistan because it's his country's culture or run his daughter over with a car in Texas and kill her because she had become too Westernized?
Is Islam considered one of the world's great religions because Islam's founding self-proclaimed 7th century prophet at the age of 53 married a 6 year old baby girl and referred to her as he favorite wife.
(does this make Islam's founder a prophet or pedophile, or both?)
Is Islam a great religion because it has millions of followers who will kill you if you don't agree with them that Islam is a religion of peace like Van Gogh was murdered?
If Christ had a 6 year old wife and had oversaw the beheading of 600 Jewish men in one 12 hour period and then sold their wives and children into slavery, or had a brother who's wife he coveted so he had his brother divorce his wife so he could marry her, would there even be a Christian faith today Ms. Quinn?
Ms. Quinn, can you give all of us your personal opinion on WHY Islam is considered one of the world's great religions?
Please, enlighten all of us because I don't get it. Is Islam a religion that should be respected or just tolerated?

Posted by: thevoter | November 11, 2009 8:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Liberal commentators are trying to protect Muslims and in this I am with them. Most Muslims are good people.

At the same time, liberals in their zeal do try to obfuscate the truth. Remember the Buddhist monks who sacrificed their own lives and eventually brought down the Diem government in Vietnam? But it was their own lives which they gave to protest an injustice. Killing someone else in the name of your religion is a bizarre idea. It is like saying, "I won't pray, but I will force you to pray so I go to heaven!"

Islam has been a violent religion over the centuries, and so of course has been Christianity. However, Christianity's hold on Christian nations has greatly weakened due to the influence of science, liberal political tradition, the intellectual heritage from the Greeks and last but not least, the gentle figure of Jesus who spoke of turning the other cheek.

Modern Christianity is a house that rests on many pillars. But Islam rests on only one, the Koran. That is what makes Muslims vulnerable because when the Koran tells them to kill infidels, they are faced with the choice of either killing, or else betraying (or ignoring) the Koran.
There is no prophet other than Muhammad and when he is wrong (as we all can be at times) there is great danger for Muslims.

This is a problem and most Muslims do solve it by remaining peaceful. But there is a danger, and the danger is in the Koran itself. We need to face this fact.

Posted by: rohitcuny | November 11, 2009 8:50 AM
Report Offensive Comment

It is time for Ms. Quinn to retire. No offense, but your voice one of the past. Your observations are those of a wealthy, isolated, out-of-touch Washington socialite. This country is in desperate need of real journalists.

Posted by: RafikiRuby | November 11, 2009 8:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Of course, this was an unfortunate incident. Sadly this was not the first of its kind and majority of the time, the blame or responsibility falls towards terrorists or those of Islamic faith ever since 9/11. Major Hasson was a certified, experienced, psychiatrist for the Army. His actions were not caused because he was suddenly provoked, but over an extended period of being constantly intimidated and discriminated against due to his religious beliefs. This is what ultimately caused him to subject to this level of rage and violence.

Posted by: TieyJay | November 10, 2009 12:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Perhaps it should be a deranged, devoutly Muslim, single, grieving army psychiatrist killed 13 people. It is certainly possible that there were factors other than his religion, but it is also becoming increasingly clear that his religion played a major role in motivating this man. When you list the possible "headlines" I have no reason to deny that they ALL should be included. To have a complete picture we should not limit the discussion and reject the notion the Religion of Submission played a role. While religion can play a positive role, in our world one particular religion is overwhelming a negative force.

Posted by: rentianxiang | November 10, 2009 10:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

**Blame Hasan not islam**

Yes,right.

Blame Hitler not Nazism.
Blame Musssolini not Fascism.
Blame Stalin not Communism.

Mentality/Logic of this article written,most probably,by one of Dear Sally Quinn's muslim friends is questionable.

*Blame Individual not faith* means *Blame mosquitos not Marsh/Morass*

My Dear Queen,
Please,Marsh has to be dried,otherwise,there will be always mosquitos.

Posted by: halozcel1 | November 10, 2009 8:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

No, Sally, Islam's a major actor here.

From the UK Morning Telegraph:
http://tinyurl.com/yk3ups9

"Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the gunman who killed 13 at America's Fort Hood military base, once gave a lecture to other doctors in which he said non-believers should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats.

He also told colleagues at America's top military hospital that non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell who should be set on fire. The outburst came during an hour-long talk Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, gave on the Koran in front of dozens of other doctors at Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington DC, where he worked for six years before arriving at Fort Hood in July."

Posted by: WmarkW | November 9, 2009 6:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"When James von Brunn went on a shooting rampage at the Holocaust museum earlier this year, was it because he was a Christian, a white supremacist, a bitter loser or a nut case?"


An opportunistic and disingenuous question, hilariously, intended to be rhetorical.
----------------------------
NOt rhetorical. People have died at the hands of Christian/Catholic antisemites.

There is no question that Van Brunn's cultural Christianity figured in his hatred and crime.

It is also not coincidental that Morgan, who gunned down co-ed Johanna Justin Jinich in a campus bookstore because she was Jewish, was Catholic.

He was a known antisemite, his diary filled with antisemitic filth culled from a variety of sources.

Did the Christianity of one, the Catholicism of the other cause their respective crimes? No. They were necessary factors, but they were not sufficient.
--------------------
Try, Sally, next time, to raise the discourse level just a bit. WE are dealing, as a nation, with a horrific crime.
People are confused. There is the possibility of backlash. Preventing it is better left to those better informed, better prepared than you have shown yourself to be.

Posted by: Farnaz1Mansouri1 | November 9, 2009 6:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The great number of terrorist incidents committed world wide are by Muslims. We may not like or understand that but it's sensible to a Islamic Jihadi, and the most effective way to engage with what he/she considers to be the enemy of their people and their God. Just because Europeans don't have such faith or Will doesn't make it insane. It does mean that we do not understand the Islamic World and we try to explain it in our terms, which is not productive. In this case it seems overwhelmingly clear that Major Hasan's religion and identity that was the factor that motivated him. We don't often hear of mass murdering Psychiatrists do we? We don't hear of Military Officers of rank, going berserk either. The idea that a Jihadi has to be crazy or deranged to do such a thing, is a Western liberal concept, he is considered a hero by many in the Islamic world. Islam is 1.4 Billion people and if half condemn his actions, the other half applaud, something we are aware of by polls done in the Islamic world. Let's try to understand the enemy rather than place a liberal gloss over things that obfuscates truth.

Posted by: leeada47 | November 9, 2009 6:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

What's troubling is the number of educated Muslims committing acts of violence more typical of person with lower IQ. How often do medical doctors go on shooting rampages? Or owners of TV networks behead their wives? Or groups of educated New Yorkers plot to blow up airports?

Plots like this are usually the province of losers like Timothy McVeigh, Buford Furrow or those two stupid skinheads in Tennessee who plotted to kill Obama.

Who would use their PhD to fly an airliner into a skyscraper?

Posted by: WmarkW | November 9, 2009 5:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company