Samuel Rodriguez
President, National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference

Samuel Rodriguez

Rodriguez is founding pastor of Third Day Worship Centers and President of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference.

 ALL POSTS

Hispanic Evangelicals See Major Flaw in Each Candidate

As members of the fast-growing brown evangelical community, we find ourselves between the proverbial rock and the hard place. Surely, we resonate with the Vietnam War Hero, Republican presumptive nominee Sen. John McCain, on issues such as marriage, life, and immigration. However, what do we say to our children and grandchildren when they ask whom we voted for in the election that embodied the prophetic possibility of permanently knocking the legs off and crippling the behemoth of racism in our nation via the candidacy of Sen. Barack Obama?

Let us contextualize the narrative a bit. Brown evangelicals currently stand at the nexus of a righteousness and justice platform. Historically, white evangelicals thrived by the continual impetus of a two-item platform agenda: life and marriage. On the other side, progressive evangelicals and particularly black Christians coalesced around the social-economic issues such as health care, education, and poverty alleviation. Suddenly, Hispanic Christians, particularly Hispanic evangelicals arrive with a commitment to reconcile both sides with a platform that incorporates the aforementioned issues within a framework of righteousness and justice.

So what do we do? On one hand, do we support the candidate who invested, in comparison to all the other, more political capital in supporting comprehensive immigration reform and deterring the deportation of 12 million of our brethren? Yet, how do we support McCain when his party stands responsible for a xenophobic and nativist strategy rekindling the racist elements within our society?

Or do we support Obama who stands on the polar opposite end with Hispanic Christians on issues such as sanctity of life and traditional marriage advocacy, yet resonates with us on health care, education, poverty alleviation, immigration and other justice concerns?

Correspondingly, the 47 million strong Hispanics in America, and particularly the entire Hispanic faith community, may very well determine the outcome of the 2008 election via the swing states of New Mexico, Florida, Nevada, Ohio, Arizona and Colorado. The question is not whom do we vote for? The true question is which Isaac do we place on the altar?

In order to address the question, The National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference hosted the "Hispanic Evangelicals and the 2008 Presidential Elections Summit" earlier this month in Costa Mesa, Calif. Both McCain and Obama sent representatives to this unprecedented gathering. Dr. Jesse Miranda stated that for the first time in American history, Hispanic evangelicals stand committed to contextualizing the narrative of political social activism within the framework of the presidential elections.

Accordingly, the summit participants, including the denominational leaders of America's largest Hispanic Christian denominations, from the Assemblies of God, Baptists, Pentecostals and others a long with mega church pastors, organizational leaders, scholars and members of the evangelical Hispanic media, discussed which candidate best addresses the concerns in the Hispanic evangelical electorate and which one best reflects the core values of such constituency.

Dr. Juan Hernandez, McCain's National Hispanic Outreach Director, explained to the group that McCain should be the candidate of choice simply on three key areas: Immigration reform, sanctity of life and traditional marriage. Hernandez in essence stated that McCain's commitment to immigration reform alone should prompt all Hispanics to make him the candidate of choice. The only problem with Dr. Hernandez's assertions is that according to research presented by Dr. Gaston Espinosa from Claremont McKenna College, immigration does not even appear in the top 5 concerns for Hispanic American voters. On the life issue, McCain does have more traction. The leaders unanimously voted and determined that a commitment to a life platform stands as the deal breaking issue for Hispanic evangelicals.

After Joshua Dubois, Faith Outreach Coordinator for the Obama Campaign, addressed the gathering via speakerphone, Dr. Shaun Casey, who flew in on the final day of the gathering addressed the summit on behalf of Sen. Obama. Shaun was recently appointed as the National Evangelical Outreach Director for Obama 08. Dr. Casey articulated the position of Sen. Obama as it pertains to the other half of the evangelical platform, justice issues. In addition, Shaun expressed the Senators' commitment to reducing abortion while addressing the causes of abortion such as poverty and the lack of a high school education. Undoubtedly, Casey's presentation provoked many questions and exchanges with various summit attendees.

Conclusion? "Obama is one issue away from capturing the Hispanic Evangelical vote", said Bishop Steve Perea of Christian Worship Centers, a multi-ethnic megachurch pastor and participant. If he can move a bit center right on abortion, then the Democratic nominee may capture a constituency that voted 68% for George W. Bush in 2004.

Even America's largest Hispanic evangelical organization stands divided on the presidential candidates. NHCLC Vice President for Social Justice, Rev. Wilfredo De Jesus, senior pastor of the 4,500-member New Life Covenant Church in Chicago, just joined the Obama Campaign and serves as spokesperson for Matthew 25, a progressive evangelical Political Action Committee committed to Obama's election, while Rev. Mark Gonzalez, NHCLC vice president for governmental affairs, serves on McCain's faith advisory board.

At the end of the day, here's the question. Will abortion trump immigration? Will Latinos ignore the xenophobic and nativist rhetoric allowed by the Republican Committee and vote for McCain? In other words, will Hispanics vote for McCain in spite of his party or will they vote for Obama in spite of his abortion stance? The answer may very well determine who occupies Pennsylvania Avenue come January 2009.

By Samuel Rodriguez  |  August 14, 2008; 4:03 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: What Evangelicals Want | Next: Forgiveness Requires Repentance

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



I am not Hispanic. I am Irish/German white. I am Christian.

Rev. Rodriquez writes:

"Or do we (Hispanics) support Sen. Obama who stands on the polar opposite end with Hispanic Christians on issues as sanctity of life (v. abortion) and traditional marriage advocacy, yet resonates with us on health care, education, poverty alleviation, immigration and other justice concerns?"

The issues of health care, immigration, education, poverty etc. are all noble, valid concerns.

However, they are all trumped by life issues especially abortion. Life begins at conception thereafter to be respected, defended and protected.

Abortion is the pre-eminent *INTRINSIC* evil of our day. The other issues, though important, pale in comparison to abortion.

The above is one of many reasons why I will be voting for Sen. McCain and not Sen. Obama this Nov.

Posted by: Dave | August 19, 2008 9:30 AM
Report Offensive Comment

How long will "On Faith" continue to confuse news/opinion with religious faith? Why not use your space more appropriately, stop making us "nauseous".

Posted by: R.S.Newark | August 19, 2008 7:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Barrack is a disgusting sick man. He did not vote against "induced labor abortion" in where a mother is given medication to have pre mature labor and the child is actually born alive and left to die. Obama opposed the born alive infant protection act and was the only democrat to do so.

95% of black people that vote for him will do so only because he is black and for entitlements.

95% of whites that for for him will do so because they don't want to be thought of as racists. There also cowards, cause when the going gets tough the whites start a running.

95% of Hispanics that vote for him will do so because they don't know any better, they think the white man stole there land and is trying to keep them down.

Silly hippies!


Posted by: Francisco | August 18, 2008 11:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a white person who lived in an immigrant community for 10 years out of compassion and tolerance for the "other", I can tell you all that the non-white immigrants are the most racist people I have ever seen in my entire life. They openly admitted to me many times that they were here to conquer the whites and steal their wealth.

But oh, I am not supposed to say stuff like that because even though it is true, I will be called xenophobic.

Posted by: DontTypeLies | August 18, 2008 10:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There were quite a few xenophobic democrats rearing their heads in the primaries, especially in Pennsylvania and West Virginia... I don't think xenophobia or racism can be confined to a single party. McCain, and (of all people) Bush, the de facto leader of the Republican Party, were advocates of the immigration legislation that would have brought many otherwise law-abiding Hispanics out from hiding.

Posted by: Chris | August 18, 2008 5:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Can someone tell me where Obama met Malcom X? He died in 1965 and Obama was born in 1961. How did they meet?
So how can he be "close" to him?
And to Farrakhan? Is he close to him because he lived in the same city?
Nice logic, "Pedro"

Posted by: athena3 | August 18, 2008 5:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The Bible has been the basis of many real life decisions for a host of people all over the world. The many versions of Christianity that claim to have the support of this book are presently beyond me. What I do know is that many of the acts committed in the name of "God and the king" can only be described as injurious to human beings. I am therefore challenged to understand how anyone can justify taking what is a personal ethical value such as whether or not to have an abortion and holding it above issues that are associated with a much higher rate of adversity and death in human beings. Unemployment, education and healthcare are a few that come to mind. I have never met anyone who, after having had an abortion regarded it with glee. Much like war, the only people who enjoy it are those whose lives are not at risk. Using the Bible as a basis of an attack upon this procedure is much like using the Bible to justify slavery and its successors. It would be wonderful if there were no need for abortions. The preoccupation with this ethical issue while children are undereducated, adults are harassed and healthcare is becoming more of a privilege than a right seems to have things backwards. Abortion is an issue, yes, but it is an issue that is being used, sometimes inadvertently, to distract from other more important matters which exist within the so called christian community as well as the secular. There are issues of race, gender, employment, education and healthcare,foreign and domestic policy that need to be addressed in detail before we get locked into eternally contentious issues that are so much less important.

Posted by: Draesop | August 18, 2008 5:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maybe Hispanics realize, as most people do, that turning immigration and citizenship into entitlement programs for Hispanics is utter nonsense.

Posted by: bonehead | August 18, 2008 5:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Some folks are bleating about Latino's somehow being "racist" when they are banding together to protect their common interests. Here's a clue for you all - it's been the Republican party that has been demonizing Latinos for nearly 2 decades. You try to pass state laws to punish people for being Latino and somehow are shocked when they turn away from Republicans and get organized?

Pedro - odd that you chose a forum on faith to lie. Guess you are the biggest athiest I've ever seen. Oh, and that racist you see = you're confusing your TV set for a mirror. Racists like you have no place in this country. Better practice saying "President Obama", cause yer gonna be using it a lot over the next 9 years!

MHR - you write like a racist. Black folks can think for themselves (pretty clear you avoid them in your life or you'd know better) and they prefer the Democratic party because the Democratic party doesn't use campaign tactics that appeal to white racists (like you?).

Posted by: Marc Edward | August 18, 2008 5:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

One thing I don't understand is why anyone honestly believes that voting for X equals a vote for Y.

Pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion. Just because I support a woman's right to choose does not mean that I support the death of so many unborn babies. Likewise, neither Obama nor McCain support abortion.

What Obama supports is the kind of education and health care reform that would make abortions seem less like the "only way out" for so many women. No woman wants to abort a baby. But some feel that they have to do so.

Answer me this: what do you expect McCain to do about abortion if he makes it to the White House? Do you think he'll make it illegal? Do you think anyone in their right mind would take the risk of illegalizing something like that? All that illegalization would do is increase the death rate as more and more women turn to back-alley butchers and wire hangers to perform a procedure they *could* have gotten done in a sterile, regulated environment. What McCain will do (if anything) is hopefully employ the same strategy that Obama would: better sex ed classes, health care reform, et cetera.

I agree with Marc Edward. Anyone who votes Republican based on abortion issues is kidding him/herself. As far as I'm concerned, abortion is a moot point in politics.

Posted by: J | August 18, 2008 3:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why does God seem to condone the unlawful behavior of millions of Hispanics who are here by reason of breaking the laws of this country. In the days of the Bible, the tribes of Abraham had laws for the good of the people and punishment for those who didn't obey. Did God draw a ring around the United States and make it a "no law zone" for the benefit of Hispanics who forced their way into this country ?

Why would any other American vote for Obama ? He's had the attitude it's all about Latinos so white and blacks should give their vote to somebody who needs it. Apparently Obama doesn't. He's all about amnesty and the destruction of the American culture hidden under the guise of "change". That change is nothing but a Trojan horse. Read that story. You'll see the outcome parallels the U.S.

If Hispanics want to let the Catholic faith dictate their lives fine, but some of us just don't want the "no birth control" dogma turn this country like the Latin American countries who over populated themselves into third world countries. That's not about God. It's about the church collection plates.

Posted by: TGood | August 18, 2008 2:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

In response to Rodriguez's point about "traditional marriage advocacy," I emphasize that the legality of gay marriage is a justice concern. The "xenophobic and nativist strategy" that he rightly condemns has its counterpart in the homophobic strategy of the religious right - both promote fear of a diabolical Other. I suspect Rodriguez can appreciate that similarity, whatever his personal beliefss about homosexuality.

Posted by: Tonio | August 18, 2008 2:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Unfortunately the Latin evangelical vote is not AT ALL like the latin catholic vote. Catholics vote on compassion as Jesus lived, love of thy brother, and caring for the least member of society, and being good stweards of the earth God gave us.

The majority of latin evangelicals will vote for the white guy out of fear, out of obedience to the 'big man is mainstream' concept, and out of overt racism. Why?

That's what evangelical radio and many
evangelical leaders spout.

They should take a lesson from Rick Warren, perhaps.

They will vote the republican line on abortion.

They will vote AGAINST their own best societal interests.

...And then will continue to argue for and support illegal immigration.

Posted by: JBE | August 18, 2008 2:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Let me just say anyone who votes for or against someone largely based on race, is an absolute disgrace and should have to forfeit the privilege of voting. Having a minority win an election certainly sends a message to the world about the abundant opportunities in America and that's nice, but it's no substititue for competence. And you're really lacking even an average IQ if you think having a black president fundamentally changes race relations in America.

Posted by: Concerned | August 18, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The only racism in this society is the anti-white racism that is widespread in the black, Hispanic and Asian communities. Barak Obama attended an anti-white racist church that whorshiped Africa and African Americans. Hispanic groups are openly racist, like National Council of the Race, League of United Latin Americans (just who are they united against? Whites of course.), Mecha, who worship Azatlan, which never existed, Chinese for Affirmative Action, etc. Non-whites are the most racist groups in the U.S. Affirmative action is anti-white discrimination. Electing Obama will only heighten the inherent racism in the non-white community in the U.S. When searching for racism to defeat, you should look to yourself and your community first. Where in Christianity do you find the right to discriminate against whites?

Posted by: Johnnie | August 18, 2008 2:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

first of all, to support obama is to support abortion and to support abortion is to not be a Christian...Hispanics who are Christians cannot let this slide...
second, Hispanics and blacks have issues in terms of power regardless of the fact that Hispanics outnumber blacks in this country and after comprehensive immigration is passed, they will double or triple the number of Hispanics in this country.
third, you inserted your hate rehtoric of the Republicans in your article...how sad, whose butt are you trying to kiss?

Posted by: Dwight | August 18, 2008 2:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't know why Christians have a hard time figuring out who to vote for. I'm a Catholic and it's easy. Jesus spoke all the time about justice for the poor. So it seems to me, if you vote your Christian conscious, you have to vote for the man who was against and illegal war from the beginning and who wants to help achieve justice for the poor. Case Closed!

PS. McCain is divorced too

Posted by: Bridget | August 18, 2008 2:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Brown Evange-poilticos Righteous Club

The Reverend Samuel Rodriguez makes it: That Might Makes
Right .. when it is welded to swing elections. The Reverend
arrives at the use of the political club, if the main politico
parties in this country exercise any kind of a platform to bar Brown Hispanic People who are here illegally.

The Reverend sees such a bar - as aggressive racism against people who are Brown. Mexico a country of over 100 million, for
example, can't seem to match the energy of Ireland and China. The politico will of Mexico is transferred to the United States; and now the Reverend states that those numbers will be used to sever the legs of the new racism that that would threaten Brown immigration to this country.

Jesus Christ was not a militarist evangelical. and he observed that laws were to be observed.


Posted by: 3rd-Party Advocate | August 18, 2008 1:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

author wrote: "As members of the fast-growing brown evangelical community..."

-------------------

So while screaming racism ... to quote you "the behemoth of racism in our nation", you don't seem to have a problem with segregating people by the color of their skin into political groups.

In other words, if we do not believe your political views, then we're racist? Wow, no wonder you see a racist everywhere.

Racist ... boy has that word lost it's meaning.

Posted by: Anonymous | August 18, 2008 12:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

How can Hispanic evangelicals voice a commitment to ending racism while simeltaneously committing themselves to destroying equal rights for women in this country? Maybe your confusion in due, in large part, to the fact that while you loathe descrimination against "brown" men, you salvate at the idea of discriminating legally against women of all colors.

Posted by: IH2008 | August 18, 2008 12:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Exactly what does this group's hispanicity add to discussions of public policy? Why is it assumed that an Hispanic views issues different from any other American? People do not think with their skin color or with their ethnicity- they do that with their brains and metaphorically with their hearts. Blacks do vote in overwhelming majorities for left wing candidates and for black candidates
but more Americanized Hispanics are not as circumscribed by ethnicity. 43% of Hispanics voted for Bush in 2004 and well illustrates the fact that Hispanics prefer thinking for themselves and as individuals. Group-think is fine for sheep.

Posted by: mhr | August 18, 2008 12:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Why should the Republicans get any credibility on the issue of abortion? Certainly the Democratic Party has upheld the Roe decision consistantly. The Republicans have opposed Roe, calling abortion "murder" and the years since Roe "a holocaust". However the Republicans have never DONE anything about abortion. When they have held both houses of congress, a massive Republican majority on the SCOTUS, and the White House they have done nothing. Why is this? Could it be because if Republicans started passing laws against abortion they might lose the rest of the country? Could it be that by doing nothing beyond proclaiming their "support for life" they are keeping the support (money and votes) of well meaning pro-life folks?
When are the pro-life folks going to wake up? The Republicans have been pimping you folks to the polls every 2-4 years and otherwise ignoring your cause. It was under Democratic policies that the number of abortions dropped for 8 years.
Oddly once Dubya took office the federal government stopped tracking numbers of abortions - why is that? Why wouldn't they want people to know if the rate of abortion went up once a Republican took office?

I ask these questions a lot, and the usual response from pro-life people is silence. I expect the same here.

Posted by: Marc Edward | August 18, 2008 11:40 AM
Report Offensive Comment

"So what do we do? On one hand, do we support the candidate who invested,...in supporting
and immigration."

"comprehensive immigration reform and deterring the deportation of 12 million of our brethren?"

"Or do we support Obama who stands on the polar opposite end ...yet resonates with us on health care, education, poverty alleviation, immigration and other justice concerns?"

"Immigration reform"

"McCain's commitment to immigration reform alone should prompt all Hispanics to make him the candidate of choice..."

"research presented by Dr. Gaston Espinosa from Claremont McKenna College, immigration does not even appear in the top 5 concerns for Hispanic voters"


"capture a constituency that voted 68% for George W. Bush in 2004." (Because of his support for immigrant amnesty)

"Will abortion trump immigration?"

I don't especially mind that none of this has anything whatsoever to do with religious beliefs-

But out of 11 paragraphs- 8 are about immigration.

It is ok- we know it is all about immigration.

Maybe you could link the study and its parameters-

Posted by: Not Immigration? | August 16, 2008 3:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Many Hispanics understand that racism is racism and it is wrong, whether from whites towards blacks or blacks towards whites.
Obama has come accross as representing black racism. His closeness to Rev wright, Farrakan, Malcom X, etc. When people look at Obama (and Michelle Obama as well), they see the racist black person that we have seen on TV, movies, and everyday in society, where they express rudeness, bad language, demanding special treatment, and hatred for America and white people. Hispanics voters hate racism, so they feel right voting for McCain. What about the mayority of white voters? Obama is not going to win, is probably the best prediction we can make.

Posted by: Pedro | August 15, 2008 2:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company