Vitriol + guns = disaster
After Saturday's tragic shooting in Tucson, some have pointed the finger at inflammatory political rhetoric.
Many singled out Sarah Palin's now-infamous "Don't Retreat, Instead - RELOAD!" tweet and her 'Crosshairs' campaign map, which included Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords' district, as a sign that some politicians have gone too far in stoking vitriol against their political opponents. (Since the shooting, Palin reportedly emphasized in an email that she "hates violence.") Others reject any connection between the shooter, who does not appear to espouse any coherent ideology, and our current political climate.
What are the ethical and moral implications of incendiary political language?
"I don't understand how anybody can be held responsible for somebody who is completely mentally unstable like this," the New York Times reported a Palin advisor as saying. "People actually accuse Governor Palin of this. It's appalling - appalling. I can't actually express how disgusting that is."
It seems to be beyond the comprehension of Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and others how anyone could suggest that they be responsible for Saturday's violence. Perhaps it ought to be made expressly clear:
VITRIOL + GUNS = DISASTER
For two years we have watched as political leaders and members of the press have made incendiary rhetoric not the exception but the rule in Washington and around the country. A culture of fear and hatred has created a foundation for the most contentious political atmosphere in generations. Witness comparisons between Obama and Hitler, calls to "Impeach the Muslim Marxist," ginned up stories about Mexican immigrant beheadings, ceaseless attacks on Muslims ("No Temple for the God of Terror") and gays ("Homosex is a threat to national security"). Those who have been in politics from the heyday of the Civil Rights Movement and the most contentious years of the Vietnam War have warned us that they have never seen an America as dangerously divided as our country is today.
Combine this political atmosphere with the reckless and reprehensible proliferation of gun images, gun terminology and guns. And, of course, the absurd and illogical disconnect between gun access and gun violence. And then we wonder why tragic incidents such as Tucson occur.
Saturday was, simply, the brutal and inevitable intersection of fear, hatred and guns. There are those who, predictably, were quick to classify the violence as the work of a solo individual who held no coherent political ideology. This dangerous and misleading analysis reflects a willful blindness to the context and implications of the shootings. If we are smart and lucky, Saturday will be a wake-up call to America: We can continue with business as usual and respond with shock and abdication of responsibility when tragedy occurs. Or we can call for a radical readjustment to the new status quo. We can demand an end to the hijacking of American civil discourse by those who feed their own political and professional ambitions through fostering an environment that endangers all of us and threatens the soul of our democracy.
Did Sarah Palin hope that Jared Loughner would see her Crosshair map, take a gun and start shooting? Of course not. But in the prescient words of Bill Clinton after the Oklahoma City bombing: "There is this vast echo chamber, and [the words we say]... fall on the serious and the delirious alike." We have seen too many times the toxic combination of hateful words and dangerous weapons. It's about time we learn the lesson of history before even more blood is shed.
By
Sharon Brous
|
January 11, 2011; 1:08 AM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: American idolatry? |
Next: God, guns, and politics: an unholy Trinity
Posted by: US-conscience | January 18, 2011 10:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Did Sarah Palin hope that Jared Loughner would see her Crosshair map, take a gun and start shooting? Of course not.
Sharon you are a b i t c h. Libel with malicious intent of a public figure is a crime.
Posted by: rickshawjim | January 16, 2011 8:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The police found an envelope with a letter inside from Griffon, thanking JLL for attending her city meetup. Assissinate and Griffon were written on the envelope, in 2007. Palin wasn't even on the politcal scene, and Beck was still over at some other station, not even on Fox. But somehow this looney according to hack author saw Palin's map and went beserk. Instead of pointing fingers, which the hack is by mentioning Beck, Paln et al by name, (slime propoganda tatic), she should have left those names out completely and she would be more believable.
I wonder if this woman is competant to lead a temple, let alone write hack pieces in a major paper.
Posted by: rickshawjim | January 16, 2011 8:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment
For two years we have watched as political leaders and members of the press have made incendiary rhetoric not the exception but the rule in Washington and around the country.
Amazing somehow you missed the incendiary rhetoric and death threats for 8 years when Bush was president.
partisian hack. Called out.
And now the left has lost big time in Nov. and it is all Beck's Palin's etc. fault. Yes, the left implied through malicious intent that Palin was responsible. It's called libel, and the WP should be sued.
Now this hack writer is pretending it never happened, not blaming Palin. What a hack. Backpeddaling when it is already documented libeling of Palin with malicious actual intent as inciting the massacre. WP better get their lawyers ready. I see a lawsuit from my window.
Posted by: rickshawjim | January 16, 2011 8:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Apparently this mindless partisan hasn't gotten the memo.
First we had Truthers. Then we had Birthers. Now we have Mappers.
All three groups are made up of idiots.
Posted by: clydle | January 16, 2011 1:15 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Normally what comes to mind when I hear a Rabbi speak is intelligent discourse. But this one misses the mark so badly that I find it hard to believe she is what she says she is. How about my phrase "hit the mark"? Do you have a conspiracy theory for that one too? What I see here is someone who seems never to have heard or read any of the facts of this case. Perhaps she simply wrote what she wrote based on previous hate of her own without thinking. This horrid situation only gave her an excuse to bring forth her bias. Very sad and very disappointing.
Please spend a few days studying all the circumstances and history here and try again, please. You can do better.
Posted by: mostberg | January 15, 2011 5:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment
NewsBusters: Rabbis Blame the Right for Tucson 'On Faith,' Not Facts
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2011/01/15/rabbis-blame-right-tucson-faith-not-facts
Posted by: StewartIII | January 15, 2011 2:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I agree with Rabbi Brous that vitriolic political discourse and easy access to guns are key factors to be addressed but in addition, this tragic event is also related to the serious inadequacy in dealing with mental health issues in this country. The administration of the college Jared Loughner was attending was concerned enough to not let him return to classes and fellow students feared he could become violent yet there was no system to follow up to ensure that Loughner was evaluated and treated before it was too late. The large majority of mentally ill people will not be violent but there have been more than enough deadly events involving mentally ill people that we should stop dismissing them as aberrations.
Posted by: SofaSpud1 | January 12, 2011 4:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment
"This morning on “Good Morning America,” ABC’s Ashleigh Banfield sat down with Zach Osler, a high school friend of Jared Loughner, the suspect in the Tucson massacre.
Osler says his friend wasn’t shooting at people, “he was shooting at the world.” Regarding the high-pitched talk radio and cable news political rhetoric, Osler says his friend didn’t even watch the news.
He did not watch TV. He disliked the news. He didn’t listen to political radio. He didn’t take sides. He wasn’t on the left. He wasn’t on the right."
http://tinyurl.com/6bcqwnz
The only good that will come from this tragedy is that main-stream Americans have finally seen just how sick and repulsive the leftist media is.
The headlines today are already taking advantage of this opportune crisis, hoping to coax Obama in to turning the hatred they created, in to a weapon to bash the right.
It won't work this time.
It may have had some success with Clinton's speech after the OKC bombing, but now people are aware of the lies and twisted plots schemed up by the left.
Your time is almost up.
After 2012, you will never see power again for a generation.
Posted by: MrMeaner | January 12, 2011 2:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment
"There are those who, predictably, were quick to classify the violence as the work of a solo individual who held no coherent political ideology. This dangerous and misleading analysis reflects a willful blindness to the context and implications of the shootings."
Absolutely on target. (Forgive the pun.)
This shooter wasn't a nut going into a department store or a school or a cultural event and emptying his gun randomly because he felt like it.
This shooter may be mentally unstable, but he had a very specific target, and that target was a U.S. Congresswoman.
Dismissing this incident as just "a nut with a gun" completely ignores some of the most critical context for understanding the motivations of angry people.
Posted by: haveaheart | January 12, 2011 11:40 AM
Report Offensive Comment
It's been absolutely disgusting to watch figures like Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck, running to cover their responsibility for the culture of fear and hatred they've participated in creating, with cries of their own victimhood. Disgusting, but perhaps predictable. Would we really expect, even in the face of a national tragedy, for them to risk their carefully crafted popularity for some humanity and common decency? Comments like those above are proof that they don't have to. The vitriol has been injected deep, in daily treatments, where even the death of an innocent 9 year old girl cannot penetrate.
The only possible good that could have come out of an incident like this would have been the collective realization that all this has gone to far, that we have allowed ideological differences to descend into ideological conflicts, that we have become what we beheld. Palin and Beck have squandered that opportunity as the Bush administration before them squandered the international good will that grew out of 9/11. And in their effort to cleanse themselves of blame, they have sanctified the blamelessness of those who follow to them. They could have realized what's happened, and participated in a turning of the tides, and instead chose to dig the lines a little deeper, and we are all poorer for it.
"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you may murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate. So it goes... Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars." -MLK jr
Posted by: seanmgale | January 12, 2011 10:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Absolutely nothing that even the outliers in the Tea Party movement have said or done remotely approaches the level of homicidal hatred and vindictive spite that was ceaselessly and openly expressed toward President Bush from 2003-on.
A collection of photographic evidence of this systemic, collective hate for a political figure is viewable at http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621.
We've forgotten now, as the American people have the memory of a school of jellyfish, but it bears reminding that Obama and Democratic political figures today have never confronted the same pure vitriol that was distilled by the Left for Pres. Bush.
Sarah Palin is a useful straw (wo)man, but the suggestion that Republicans and their allied movements created the conditions for Jared Loughner is cynically disingenuous and reflects a convenient ignorance of recent political history.
Posted by: jcline1 | January 12, 2011 12:07 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The current level of rhetoric is hardly unprecedented. Unfortunately, the real shame here is some using tragedy though could have brought us all together as nothing more than rhetoric and vitriol to attack those you disagree with politically.
So continue with this divisive rhetoric and vitriol. Thank God, the majority of the country disagree with you.
Posted by: Fish2 | January 11, 2011 9:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Another load of crap assigning blame. People are responsible for their own actions & reactions regardless of outside influences. Ban guns & all you do is make it illegal to defend yourself. This guy would have found a gun regardless, or would have made a worse weapon. People speaking out against a corrupt government is what made this country. It has been said that a people who will sacrifice freedoms for security deserve neither. Freedom comes with a certain level of risk; the only alternative to that risk is slavery to the government. Maybe that's acceptable to you, but it's not to me.
Posted by: sharongerlach | January 11, 2011 7:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment
So true...it's bad enough when non-politicians make violent and hateful comments regarding a person or group of people, but it's even worse when a leader in our nation makes these remarks.
So often we point a "shame you" finger at celebrities for their bad behavior, insisting that they should consider their young, impressionable fans. It is so much more embarrassing that we now have to do this with our leaders!
Celebrities have always excused themselves because they "didn't ask to be role models." Politicians and government leaders of any kind have accepted a position in which "role model" is implied in the job description. They should be model citizens.
Obviously this tragic event was not Palin's intention; I'm also not sure it was the cause of this particular event. However, it is unacceptable for our leaders to make hateful/violent statements or to imply such sentiments.
Posted by: justsayin10 | January 11, 2011 3:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Twitter










Small brains + keyboards = articles like this.