Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite
Professor, Chicago Theological Seminary

Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite

Former president of Chicago Theological Seminary (1998-2008), Thistlethwaite is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

 ALL POSTS

Christmas for sale

"Keep Christ in Christmas!" is the familiar refrain of Christians who fear the secularization of the holy day celebrating the birth of Jesus, their savior.

But in America, non-Christians often celebrate Christmas.

According to a recent poll by the Christian group LifeWay Research, "A majority of agnostics or those claiming no preference (89 percent), individuals claiming other religions (62 percent), and even atheists (55 percent) celebrate Christmas along with 97 percent of Christians."

Do you need to be Christian to celebrate Christmas? What is Christmas all about?

Here's a radical idea. Let's move the Christian celebration of the birth of the savior, Christ our Lord, to late January, and let the marketers have the shopping part of Christmas in December. I know it's a challenging thought, but hear me out.

Companies can have "black Friday" so they can turn a profit for the year, and let's give them the hideous decorations in the malls as well. Let the marketers have the plastic trees, the twinkling blue lights (what happened to red and green, by the way?), the tinsel and the ribbon, Santa Claus, his sleigh and the reindeer too. I especially want the marketing people to take the Nutcrackers. And for heaven's sake, let's include company Christmas parties in this deal. Marketers can also have any movie Hollywood makes about Christmas. Take it. Take all of that.

From November until the end of December, people could greet each other with the cheery call, "Merry Shopping Season to All!" This is pretty much the way it is now, and think of this added benefit: no talking heads pontificating about the "war on Christmas." The war is over and the consumers won.

Christians could then have the ritual part of Christmas at an agreed upon Sunday in late January. We'd be rested because there would be no shopping, no wrapping, no cards, no parties, and no decorating. We could focus on the birth of the Christ child and the message of peace and good will to all that is the heart of the Christian message of salvation and the foundation of our faith.

I imagine going to church on 'new Christmas eve,' lighting a candle and singing in the semi-darkness with other people of faith. "For unto us, a child is given, for unto us, a child is born, and his name shall be called, wonderful, counselor, the Mighty God, the everlasting Father, the prince of peace."

Note to marketers: you can't have the magnificent words of Handel's Messiah, and especially not the Hallelujah Chorus, or any of the deeply meaningful Christmas hymns like Joy to the World, Oh, Come All Ye Faithful, Oh, Little Town of Bethlehem, and particularly Silent NIght.

Check out the Christmas Food Court Flash Mob Hallelujah Chorus and you'll see the difference. People shopping in a mall are suddenly surrounded by the holy sounds of Handel's "Hallelujah Chorus." The consuming stops and for one brief moment, Christmas appears. It's heartbreaking.

So, in this new deal of dividing Christmas from the shopping, Christians get the deeply religious hymns for the new ritual of Christmas or there's no sale.

By Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite  |  December 20, 2010; 2:41 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Church could be a home for the holidays | Next: Celebrating a Jewish Christmas

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Posted by: beautiful-mind | December 25, 2010 12:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

RevMark2U

I read your post of December 21, 2010 2:32 PM and it appears that you do not have a clue what Christianity is about, but you are not alone, there are many who call themselves Christian and many who most vehemently say they are not Christian that seem to be clueless about what Christianity is about.

Take care, be ready.

Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum.

Posted by: ThomasBaum | December 22, 2010 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms Thistlewaite the consumerists only win when you give over your soul to them. Christmas is not an outtie but an innie. By that I mean it is how one feels about the season that counts. If consuming is your thing then by all means consume. Someone desperately needs the job that your spending is supporting! But if Christmas is about the sharing of God's love with the world then all one has to do is to share a little love and that costs nothing but it is worth more than all the black friday receipts.

So to speak of Christmas for sale is like to say that air is for sale or smiles are for sale. Don't over think the obvious. And don't dwell on what your neighbor does just be true to your own faith and share the love.

Posted by: JDYoung | December 22, 2010 6:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Posted by: wek41 | December 21, 2010 8:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thistlethwaite is right. Only she and the rest of the columnists at OnFaith are allowed to profit from religion.

Do you have to be a raving hypocrite to be a liberal? Sure seems that way.

Posted by: bobmoses | December 21, 2010 4:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Susan, I think you're right: the consumerists have won that battle. And perhaps your idea of moving the observance/celebration to a new date also is good. Perhaps that would also be a fit response to my own Christmas-time wish(es):

I crave a word from progressive Christian friends, a message that is a distinctive Christian addition to the religiously pluralist dialogue, "This is what we think we have to add to the earnest religious conversation, recognizing that we are not superior to the other religions, but also not inferior to them. We are eager to listen deeply, in order to learn deeply, in order to re-form our own tradition where they teach us meaningfully. And then we are eager to add in our voice as a co-equal voice, worthy of reciprocal engagement by those other religions, they listening and learning as deeply from us as we from them."

I crave a word that acknowledges that Christianity, in creating Christmas (and inventing itself), has borrowed at least as much (I personally think more) from the Greek mystery religions and the Native European religions and rituals as it has from Jewish culture and religion; indeed, that it continues to neglect the Jewishness of Jesus and religion as he practiced it. I look for it to seek "teshuva" for the latter and yet also, at the same time, to take pride in its creativity, inventing a new religion with as much creativity as William Shakespeare employed in turning old plots into new plays, and with as much inexhaustible depth of meaning.

I look for it to take pride in its creativity, along with pride in the creativity of the other religions. Perhaps therein can lie an exuberant happiness and sharing among all. Perhaps something similar then can happen on Divali from the Hindu side, on Wesak from the Buddhist side, on Eid from the Muslim side, and so forth, on all the more embracing and universal observances and celebrations of the worlds different religions.

In the meantime, I wish you a deeply joyful Christmas, minus all those heinous elements you wish to be rid of, and with Handel in your ears and heart.

Posted by: RevMark2U | December 21, 2010 2:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is the first idea I have seen written in the WaPo with merit. However, moving the celebration of Christmas all the way to the end of January is a little too extreme. Do as they do in Mexico. The Feast of the Epiphany would do for celebrating the birth of Christ, because that was the first time homage had been paid to him by strangers from both near and far as the Messiah and presented with the gifts the Maji had brought with them on their search led by a star.
In Mexico, not a single outside decoration goes up until December 24th and stays up through the Feast of the Epiphany, and then it is taken down. It is this time we as Christians should celebrate all of the traditions of the church, including the birth of Jesus on the 24th. I know that you said to wait until the end of January but do you think retailers care about anything once their store closes early on the 24th so their employees can go home and celebrate the holiday? I guarantee that by noon on the 26th you will not even know that a major holiday had just occurred in every shopping mall in America.
In summation, I am with you and your premise. Enough of the Christmas decorations going up in stores during the week after Halloween and the start of the playing of Christmas music. It burns people out, and it certainly does not have the desired effect retailers hoped for, i.e. making people want to buy more. Instead, I give a card and a check to be used at some future date, when the prices will not be "seasonally adjusted upward".

Posted by: jfregus | December 21, 2010 2:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Actually, those who follow the Julian calendar - such as patriarchal Russian Orthodox, celebrate our Christmas on January 7th, and it is far less commercial and feels more holy.

Posted by: annwhite1 | December 21, 2010 2:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

joe_allen_doty

You wrote, "The 1st Century AD Church (called "The Way" in the Bible) didn't observe any holy days."

What difference does that make?

At the very beginning of the "Church", there was absolutely no New Testament part of the Bible either but there is now.

You then wrote, "Therefore for Jesus' followers even in modern times, relig holidays are not scriptural."

Actually, they are, but some look at them as holydays as opposed to holidays, Jesus's birth is mentioned, Jesus's death is mentioned, Jesus's rising from the dead is mentioned, they are mentioned in scripture, are they not?

Take care, be ready.

Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum.

Posted by: ThomasBaum | December 21, 2010 12:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Moving Christmas to a Sunday in January, huh? Great idea, that could work! I can see the stores now re-stocking after "The Holidays" to prepare for "Christmas". Special cards, candles with Jesus's image on them, electonic creches,special-edition Bibles and prayer blankets, music CDs and let's not forget the TV specials hosted by your favorite TV evangelists. Oh yes! Another opportunity to to market and make money!!

Posted by: sux123 | December 21, 2010 11:43 AM
Report Offensive Comment

In Response to comment posted by thebump -

Our consumerism is actually the cause of why so many third world countries are still in poverty. Our corporations go there to rape and pillage these other countries' natural resources and then dump our toxic electronic trash for the impovished children to pick and burn through. We are poisoning their water supply, cutting down whole forests for our greed of palm oil and wood, mining their mountains for minerals, all the while we fail to open our eyes to the destruction our consumerism causes.

Learn how our consumerism affect the rest of the world, watch the "Story of Stuff": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLBE5QAYXp8

Posted by: thebump
The inconvenient truth about our Godless consumerism is that it has lifted more millions of God's children up out of grinding poverty in just the past two or three decades than two millennia of Christian charity.
That's a thought for Christians to ponder — and one that's a hell of a lot more challenging than the authoress's drivel.

Posted by: BringYourOwnBags | December 21, 2010 9:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Academics should leave the sarcasm to South Park.

Posted by: Delongl | December 21, 2010 9:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment

In the interest of basic journalistic integrity, I demand that the Post update the above head shot of the authoress with a likeness that is less than three decades old.

Posted by: thebump | December 21, 2010 8:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Buy the kids illegal fireworks. Mom, can I have your lighter? Be carful. Here's an empty wine bottle, go shoot rockets out of it. Parents are having fire inside and kids are blowing things up outside. Put an M-80 in broken Chinese toy from last birthday.

Posted by: jobandon | December 21, 2010 6:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I've never sold knowledge. The Dermis Probe. We're on Operation Blue Light here. Doubt disciples will want Jan. for change. If we move 2/14 to 7/4 we can celebrate love late and get a divorce from independence. We have fireworks for everything around here. I expect sooner or later they'll be having Christmas night fireworks for the kids. A New Castle Christmas.

Posted by: jobandon | December 21, 2010 6:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Just a note - as with so many Christians, you've got it wrong when you talk about the "Hallelujah" chorus. One of my silly pet peeves is that the Hallelujah chorus belongs with Easter, not Christmas. Anyone who is even vaguely familiar with Handel's oratorio would know this - it's position in the performance is pretty explicit - plus, it's message isn't a Christmas one at all.

So - if the Hallelujah chorus is sung at Christmas, that's fine, since Christians shouldn't be attaching it to that event anyway.

Posted by: iamweaver | December 21, 2010 1:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't celebrate "Christ's Mass" (what Christmas really means) because I am not a Roman Catholic Church member. I have never been a member of a Protestant Church either.

Jesus' followers didn't call themselves "Christian." It was Greek-speaking pagans who made up the name. Jesus' followers were BELIEVERS!

The 1st Century AD Church (called "The Way" in the Bible) didn't observe any holy days.

Therefore for Jesus' followers even in modern times, relig holidays are not scriptural.

Posted by: joe_allen_doty | December 20, 2010 10:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Actually, Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus every time they take part in the Mass and recite The Creed.

Posted by: ThishowIseeit | December 20, 2010 9:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The inconvenient truth about our Godless consumerism is that it has lifted more millions of God's children up out of grinding poverty in just the past two or three decades than two millennia of Christian charity.

That's a thought for Christians to ponder — and one that's a hell of a lot more challenging than the authoress's drivel.

Posted by: thebump | December 20, 2010 5:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Just a thought. How about you celebrate the holiday when and how you want and leave others to do the same? You don’t have to participate in any of the commercialism; you don’t even need to put blue lights on your holy, hijacked pagan evergreen.

“you can't have the magnificent words of Handel's Messiah, and especially not the Hallelujah Chorus, or any of the deeply meaningful Christmas hymns like Joy to the World, Oh, Come All Ye Faithful, Oh, Little Town of Bethlehem, and particularly Silent NIght.”
Does that mean the performers of those songs will be returning their royalties to the ‘marketers’?

“We could focus on the birth of the Christ child and the message of peace and good will to all that is the heart of the Christian message of salvation and the foundation of our faith.”
Go right ahead.. what’s stopping you?

You are part and parcel of the War on Christmas when you start declaring how others SHOULD BE celebrating the holiday.
Mind your own business, do whatever pleases you.

Peace on earth.

Posted by: gladerunner | December 20, 2010 4:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Post a Comment




characters remaining

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company