Susan Jacoby
Author and reporter

Susan Jacoby

Susan Jacoby is the author of nine books, most recently "The Age of American Unreason" and "Alger Hiss And The Battle for History."

 ALL POSTS

The Ill Truth About Falwell

Predictably, obituary writers are already portraying the Reverend Jerry Falwell as a more respectable figure than he was. Ah, what a beautiful tradition it is to speak no ill of the dead!

In the online edition of The New York Times, writer Peter Applebome observes that Falwell was "demonized on the left in much the same way Senator Edward M. Kennedy or Jane Fonda were on the right." The word "demonized" suggests that the well-meaning Falwell was treated unfairly by the left and that there ought to be a more balanced view of his so-called achievements.

How do you demonize a man who declared that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were evidence of God's judgment on a nation corrupted by civil libertarians and advocates of abortion and gay rights? Falwell demonized himself and followed up his sincere vitriol with the usual insincere public relations apology.

Jerry Falwell, by mobilizing the religious Right as a force for reactionary politics, played a vital long-term role in every retrograde social trend of the past thirty years. He and his Christian soldiers put George W. Bush in the White House.

This man's legacy is one of bigotry, xenophobia, anti-modernism, and utter stupidity. No doubt his funeral will be well-attended.

By Susan Jacoby  |  May 15, 2007; 2:54 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Jerry Falwell | Next: A Friend Who Will Be Missed

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



bougainvilliidae tashlik altingiaceae lipoprotein antidote reeled capel spermy
http://www.sportsline.com/u/baseball/college/alumni/5206_college_index.htm >Panthers in the Majors
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/meast/9908/04/arafat/index.html

Posted by: Melodie Manning | December 19, 2007 5:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Christopher Hitchens got it right when asked if he thought Jerry Falwell went to heaven. "No, and it's a pity there's no hell for him to go to either."

ps - Randall, your momma is in here burning with me.

Posted by: Marty Kay Zee | June 27, 2007 4:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There's nothing more beautiful han watching an atheist being burned alive in their own home.

Posted by: Randall Schauffer | June 27, 2007 4:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There's nothing more beautiful han watching an atheist being burned alive in their own home.

Posted by: Randall Schauffer | June 27, 2007 4:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There's nothing more beautiful han watching an atheist being burned alive in their own home.

Posted by: Randall Schauffer | June 27, 2007 4:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks SOK7, you said that very well.

Posted by: Someone | May 18, 2007 1:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Aha, thanks, Maurice. I'd always presumed it was a Classical reference. :)

Posted by: Paganplace | May 16, 2007 10:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

David: "I suspect that it reflects a bias against people of faith"

No. It reflects a bias against, for example, people who blame September 11 on "the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America".

Posted by: Craig | May 16, 2007 8:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maurie,

Haha! Thanks for that. You learn something new everyday.

Posted by: Andrea | May 16, 2007 7:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Andrea - So was it God who coined the phrase "You stole my thunder"?

Waiting for god to create something would be akin to putting a thousand computers in a warehouse full of chimpanzees, hoping one would type "As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods; They kill us for their sport", from King Lear.

The actual phrase "You stole my thunder" was uttered by playwright John Dennis in 1709 during a production of Macbeth in which his method of simulating thunder was used in the same theater where his own play had previously been a flop.

During the Macbeth production, when Dennis heard the thunder, he stood up and screamed, "That's my thunder, by God! The villains will not play my play but they steal my thunder."

Posted by: Maurie Beck | May 16, 2007 7:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Paganplace,

Quit stealing my thunder!

Posted by: Andrea | May 16, 2007 6:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

They say that what you are
Will surely overtake you,
and you become the monster
so the monster will not break you.

G-bye Jerry. I do not hate you. And I refuse to be like you.

Posted by: Bono | May 16, 2007 6:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Think tales of Zeus might just have had something to do with it, actually, Andrea. :)

Posted by: Paganplace | May 16, 2007 5:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maurie,

So was it God who coined the phrase "You stole my thunder"?

Posted by: Andrea | May 16, 2007 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Terra Gazelle - It was that fat pudgy finger of bigotry and hubris that blamed those he thought beneith him for the death of 3000 people; not 19 men that had more in common with him then us.

One would think that god, being the omnipotent sort, would be a lot more competent in offing abominations, blasphemers, and heretics. However, whenever He acts, there seems to be a lot of collateral damage. Although I'm a lousy shot, even I could dispatch a blasphemer with relative ease. Especially since I'd only have to shoot myself.

Perhaps it is Ben Franklin's fault. After he invented the lightning rod, the Reverend Thomas Prince, pastor of Old South Church, suggested that by stealing god's thunder, Franklin's invention forced god to resort to cruder, less precise means, such as earthquakes, to send sinners below below below, gone to where the goblins go.

Posted by: Maurie Beck | May 16, 2007 3:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hi, Terra.

I don't know if it's exactly 'glee' that the man's passing really engenders, so much as that's how his supporters seem to be casting it in following his message of political division.

Certainly I bear no ill will such as his fervent (Did I see any glee there at the thought?) desire to see us tortured for eternity if we didn't obey him.

He's been an abusive, droning voice in the background of my American life for a long time. Am I a little relieved that one among several stopped? Maybe a bit. Will I sleep a little easier without worrying if something crazy and hateful that particular voice says will set off some believer having a bad day or psychotic episode?

Yeah. Just a little.

Hardly an occasion for 'glee,' though, I just hope his spirit will help work on some of the damage, wherever it goes next.

Posted by: Paganplace | May 16, 2007 2:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I guess the reason I and others are a bit gleeful about Falwell's demise, is that it was our face he pointed his finger at and blamed for 9-11.

Those who are more forgiving are most likely the ones that are included in the Moral Majority. Me I am a Pagan and my best friends are Pagans and one happens to be a Gay Pagan.

It was that fat pudgy finger of bigotry and hubris that blamed those he thought beneith him for the death of 3000 people; not 19 men that had more in common with him then us.

I do not believe in tolerance, I believe in acceptance. Accept me as I am... you do not have to accept my beliefs, but accept me.

And keep your fat finger out of my face.

terra

Posted by: Terra Gazelle | May 16, 2007 2:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maurie Beck,
lol...well we can only hope that he would then learn that being gay and Pagan is as much a blessing as anything else we, as humans can be.

It is not who you love, but how you love.
Too many forget to love.

Blessed Be...

terra

Posted by: Terra Gazelle | May 16, 2007 1:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't hate Falwell for being Christian - I hate him for being a horrible human being.

Posted by: Luke | May 16, 2007 1:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I don't hate Falwell for being Christian - I hate him for being a hateful, horrible human being.

Posted by: Luke | May 16, 2007 1:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It seems his teaching to misconstrue the words of and vilify anyone who calls him and those like him on his BS is a lesson well-learned, anyway.

And, believe it or not, it's not the world's fault if some Christians came 'out of their sanctuary' and found, much to their surprise, perhaps, that their ideas about others just don't hold up in the real world.

That you don't rule here.

I think Rev. Falwell did Christians a major disservice *by* so-politicizing an untenable and regressive view of your religion that simply can't stand, but continues to do damage all around.

I think what he did 'for' conservative Christianity in politics and public life was no real service: he sanctified ignorance and bigotry, and, I think, drew out the very worst in the service of corporate interests that harm the people and the Earth. Taught people to *ignore* the wrongheadedness of anyone that waves a bible or claims to be religious, to call intolerance and intrusion into the daily and public lives of others 'love,' to buy claims of divine power when they're being made, but dismiss them when they turn out to be *wrong* or even seem to backfire. You should see a list of the 'prophecies from God' he's made over the years... all dead wrong.

Would Bush's totally irrational and inadvisable 'divinely inspired' Iraq war have washed if much of the population weren't rather conditioned to blindly support such things? Would he himself have even dared go ahead and do that 'On Faith,' with no real plan, if that hadn't been made 'socially acceptable?' I don't think so.

I'm not an atheist, but what they don't like him for is *not* because they really are the villains in people's personal 'passion plays' that people like Falwell make them out to be: they don't like him because he's *pushed ignorance and unreason.*

As for me, well, blaming me for 9/11 on three counts... (really, blaming *American Christians* for 'tolerating' people he happened to hate, as in, apparently, not oppressing us sufficiently? What's he talking, there, exile? Death? Where's that go?)

Well, that was more than a 'hoof in mouth' to me, (interesting metaphor. Who has hooves in that religion, again? :) )

The fact that he seems to have taught you not to take such horrible things *very seriously* as a sign of the rot in his theology and political vision, may be part of the legacy of these kinds of people that you'd do well to put to rest with the man.


Posted by: Paganplace | May 16, 2007 1:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is interesting to hear inclusivistic liberals like Susan Jacoby complain about the vitriol of Jerry Faldwell in a very vitriolic fashion.

Amy, who posted above, apparently is intolerphobic and bigophobic. How shameful.

Posted by: Frank Chase | May 16, 2007 1:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Sko7.

I won’t totally disagree with you. Executing your beliefs in everything you do would generally be helpful. The problem really was the presentation of his message.

I am guessing people got irked at him because he was or appeared to be perpetuating his belief onto others through politics and eventually through changes to the law. I would like to hear people chime in on that.

We are a world of varied beliefs and what works for a one does not work for another. Christians don’t even agree on everything so why would atheists or those of other faiths be any different? If you present your message in a way that is hateful (or at least perceived as such) then you are either one doing a disservice to your religion or two not serving you purpose of perpetuating your belief. I think that is where Farwell missed the mark.

The old argument goes you can not legislate morality. You can not force people into things, we are not wired that way. Change comes from within and I don’t think his approach helped the general populous change from within.

Posted by: Rob Adams | May 16, 2007 12:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I hope you're right, SOK7 and that people never forget what happens when someone like Falwell has so much political clout

Posted by: E favorite | May 16, 2007 12:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Jerry Falwell is hated not because he was a Christian. He was hated because he was a political Christian. It is okay to Believe behind the drawn curtains of your home or in the basement of your church, but to have the audacity to stand in the legislature and the courts of law and say ‘I believe’ – well atheists would tell you that’s not quite American.

Modern culture is largely based upon self-indulgence - if it feels good, do it (it must be right). Falwell had the balls to stand up and say that there is a Right and a Wrong and that modern self-indulgence is almost always wrong.

What is intolerance? Is it bad? Are we cool or hip if we tolerate drugs in our schools? Are we in the right if we tolerate consensual sex between minors and adults? Jerry Falwell’s intolerance is a mirror image of what he thought the Bible told him was right and wrong. I don’t know how he got to the conclusion that Rock-n-Roll was evil – I can’t find any passage in the scriptures that might apply. But in a day and age where no one will stop to help a man being mugged in the streets, Falwell stood up and said ‘this is what I believe is true’, and this is why. Everyone who disagreed with him labeled him intolerant.

In making a stand, the Rev. Jerry Falwell managed to piss a lot of people off. Falwell even managed to piss a lot of Christians off. Billy Graham is much more likable and much less offensive. But Falwell may well have made a greater mark on society than Graham or any other evangelist, because he dared to tell Christians it was okay to be political, to vote political, to say things political. I think that is the real reason atheists hate him: not for the hoof-in-mouth he had after 9/11; not for his crusade against modern music or gays; nor for any of the other presumed missteps he has taken with his life and ministry. He taught that it was okay to let God out of the sanctuary and carry Him with you in everything you do.

And his death will do nothing to change that message.

Posted by: sok7 | May 16, 2007 12:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm intolerant toward intolerant people. I'm also bigoted against bigots. I see no contradiction in that. There's no requirement in my morality to give equal consideration to reprehensible positions.

Posted by: Amy | May 16, 2007 10:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Rob,
I see you beat me to a post again. How fitting it is you. Here is my answer to a question you posed a few weeks back. I'd like to thank the hundreds of Jerry Falwell "well wishers" for helping me set up this point so easily.

get attacked-return fire-justify response

get attacked-return fire-justify response

get attacked-return fire-justify response

get attacked-return fire-justify response

Each time we fall deeper into the trap.

The only way to a higher level of spirituality, as you asked, or freedom as I would call it is to break this cycle.

"Yeah, It stinks bad. And we all covered up in it too. Ain't nobody clean. Be nice to get clean, though." - from Glory

Posted by: ghostbuster | May 16, 2007 9:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The_Scully.

I somewhat agree with you that there is a lot of attack going on. Don’t get me wrong I vehemently disagree with what he stood for but Mr. Farwell’s actions no doubt contribute to the nasty responses. I guess my point is does the attack do any good? There definitely is benefit in point out his stance and his affect on the population. . Regardless of Farwell’s actions in the end we are only responsible for our own actions and whether we attack or merely comment.

I saw a great post by someone on Chuck Colson’s post. “forgive him and move on”.

The comment I made was I loved that post and thought it was a good idea. Before we move on we should learn the lesson Mr.Farwell taught us. When you cause division among people you are likely misguided in your religion/spirituality.

I wouldn’t say the blog is full of faithless people. We all pass back and forth from a place of high consciousness and low consciousness. When we are acting from our higher place of consciousness we can merely comment/observe when we are not in that place we act from emotion and present our message less insightfully which in the end doesn’t serve our purpose.

Posted by: Rob Adams | May 16, 2007 9:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment

DLP,

We were asked the question "How will he be remembered?". Seems the majority of us will remember him as a creep.

Posted by: Andrea | May 16, 2007 9:15 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I think this is horrible the things some people are posting here. The guy is dead, leave it be. If you want to be happy about that then do it to yourself. Public rejoicing in ones death, through any means, is absolutely disrespectful. Whether I agree with everything the man did or not, he has family and friends who love him. Please reconsider whether or not you make your thoughts public.

Posted by: DLP | May 16, 2007 1:10 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Tolerance can be a wicked practice. It depends on what one tolerates.

Posted by: DaveB | May 16, 2007 12:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment

" Ian:

Many posting here seem to be as intolerant of others as they claim Falwell was. I guess it only depends on your point of view as to who you believe is intolerant. This page just proves that those on the left are just as intolerant as those they oppose on the right."


Actually, posts like that prove nothing except that the 'Right' doesn't care what they actually do as long as they can fallaciously try and deflect the blame elsewhere with bad analogies.

Posted by: Paganplace | May 16, 2007 12:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ian,

"Many posting here seem to be as intolerant of others as they claim Falwell was. I guess it only depends on your point of view as to who you believe is intolerant. This page just proves that those on the left are just as intolerant as those they oppose on the right."

If someone launches a gratuitous and intolerant attack on a group he dislikes, such as gays, and members of the group attack him back, they are not being intolerant - they are defending themselves and pointing out the attacker's intolerance.


Posted by: Norrie Hoyt | May 15, 2007 11:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ian

Good point you raised on intolerance.

Positive intolerance - against war, terrorism, drug abuse, environmental degradation, child and spouse abuse, murder, rape etc

Negative intolerance - the list is too long and would include irrational hatred of people due on their race, religion among others.

So, for example, what is so bad about "intolerance" of ignorance, bigotry and such?

But of course, intolerance is when others don't agree with one's own views and actions and seek to counter them. Those intolerant, ignorant, obstructionist, immoral, amoral, leftist/rightist (pick either) twits!

And by the way, how can one tolerate Falwell, Robertson, Graham et al but not the Mullahs of Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq?

Equal tolerance, equal intolerance or subjective and selective tolerance/intolerance?

Obviously, intolerance begets intolerance.

Posted by: Jihadist | May 15, 2007 11:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Many posting here seem to be as intolerant of others as they claim Falwell was. I guess it only depends on your point of view as to who you believe is intolerant. This page just proves that those on the left are just as intolerant as those they oppose on the right.

Posted by: Ian | May 15, 2007 10:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Or was that thirty?

My, how time flies when you're fixated on other people's business.

Posted by: Paganplace | May 15, 2007 10:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It was said by a bumper sticker twenty precious years ago, in which other things could have been accomplished:

"The Moral Majority

Is Neither."

Period.

Posted by: Paganplace | May 15, 2007 10:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The man who coined the term "Moral Majority" (based on the assumption that all the people who told pollsters they believe in the 10 Commandments are actually moral, which is pretty funny) also coined the term "The Civil Wrongs Movement" and called Desmond Tutu a phony. He blamed 9/11 on people in American society he didn't like, even though it's clear from Osama bin Laden's writings what the true motivation was.

Having someone on this blog link lim with Martin Luther King, Jr. because they were both "men of faith" who "acted on their faith" is laughable.

And yes, Jeffrey Dahmer accepted Jesus Christ as his lord and savior in prison, so according to Falwell's theology, Dahmer will go to Heaven and Gandhi won't.

Don't like that contradiction? Then stop supporting hypocrites who claim they have a lock on morality.

Posted by: Amy | May 15, 2007 10:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

DC: "Hopefully, the American Evangelical movement has peaked."

Don't count on it. I'm amazed at the number of people who still send Jimmy Swaggart money even after he has repeatedly proven himself to be nothing but a liar.

Posted by: lepidopteryx | May 15, 2007 9:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Bye Jerry, you'll be missed... mostly by gullible, simple, "red state" people. Granted, most of these people are merely trying to make sense of existence and this flash of life (as we all are).

Hopefully, the American Evangelical movement has peaked. Religous fundamentalists should have no place in in western, secular, modern nation-states.

It makes me shudder that there are millions of people that followed this guy. Sure, if Jerry Falwell was never born, there would've been another leader of the right-wing Christian movement. However looking at the situation over the past decade or two, potential successors have seemed to just fade away; Ralph Reed, Ted Haggart, Jim Baker, etc. One of the beauties of the digital age is that "dirt" will be found on everyone, culling the group of prospective candidates exponentially.

Unfortunatly, the digital age reduces the potential group of "good" candidates also. I'm sure there would be youtube videos of the young Bill Clinton being drunk and stupid and groping women, if people had camera phones pre-1992.

Excuse the rant, I just hope to never see a more powerful version of Jerry Fallwell.

Posted by: dc_guy | May 15, 2007 8:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Good riddance to bad rubbish. The world became a better place today.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 15, 2007 8:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I love you Susan. Marry me.

Posted by: ADIOS JERRY | May 15, 2007 7:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Richard Anderson,
So the population of Hell increased by one today. How do you know? Did you get an email from one of your relatives?

Posted by: lars | May 15, 2007 7:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The_Scully has obviously never visited Christian Forums or Rapture Ready if he/she believes that one cannot both be a person of faith and bitter.

Remember, Scull, being naive isn't evidence that your opinion reflects reality.

The world is, for a short while, a happier place. May no one rise to claim Falwell's fetid throne.

Posted by: Ash | May 15, 2007 7:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Here's another one for Andrea to sing in her head:

"I could wile away the hours
Conferring with the flowers
Consulting with the rain
And my head I'd be scratching
While my thoughts were busy hatching
If I only had a brain"

Serious Hysteria.

Posted by: from oz | May 15, 2007 7:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

dont worry darling - no chance of people talking good about you after you are dead. just a lot of your sex partners damning you for those little gifts you left them in life.

Posted by: frank collins | May 15, 2007 7:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey The Scully....

Who says I have to be a person of faith. Any god that would set up a logical world where thing follow verifiable laws and processes and then leave no logical way to prove his own existence is ..... well I cant think of a word, but WHY would he do that? Why let us have proof of everything but himself? Faith doesn't make sense...

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2007 7:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Maurie,

Hysterical. Seriously. I sang that in my head.

Posted by: Andrea | May 15, 2007 6:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I used to live in Jerry's neck of the woods, and I was always struck by the sight of his mansion with white stretch limos, an extreme rarity in the Appalachian area, one of the poorest in the nation.

Posted by: stmarx | May 15, 2007 6:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's too bad the fool died so easily for all the misery he visited on this country (think Bush). Death is the end of everything and Falwell will never know that there is no god, no eternal rest, no nothing.

Posted by: Ralph | May 15, 2007 6:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Personally, Rev. Falwell woke me up to the fact that opposite the Muslim extremists, there are Christian extremists.

As for opposing views, Jerry Falwell has his views. Susan Jacoby has her views. I'm more towards Jacoby's except for the small and irrelevant wrinkle of her not believing in God (gasp!)

Billy Graham : "The worst place in hell are reserved for those who are neutral on the great issues of life."

Susan Jacoby (on Jerry Falwell): "This man's legacy is one of bigotry, xenophobia, anti-modernism, and utter stupidity. No doubt his funeral will be well-attended." ... by those who shared his views, and by those whom he vilified to make sure he's dead and buried.

May Falwell rest in peace. As he was a man of God and believer in heaven, hell and Armageddon, let him answer to God for what he has said and done in God's name and for what he believed in.

My condolence to his family for their loss and sympathies to them if they read his obituaries.
They may or may not share his views and the obits on him.

....and Pat Robertson and Osama et al are still with us. The living, the living the living.

Posted by: Jihadist | May 15, 2007 6:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The_Scully - you know, what you said is not so nice either: "This entire blog is full of faithless people (no matter what many of you say, you cannot be both a person with a true faith in a Creator God and so full of bitterness - the two just don't go together) spewing nonsense after assumption after invective."

Plus you seem to know the mind of God, asserting that that people who are bitter can't be believers.

Or perhaps this is just your own opinion?

You seem so sure.

Posted by: E favorite | May 15, 2007 6:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Since the utterly stupid will be attending Falwell's funeral, it appears that Jacoby will have a front row seat!

Posted by: Cicero | May 15, 2007 6:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I worked on the Reagan campaign in 1980. Falwell was a minor concern at that time, to me at least. Over the years I watched as his wing of the Republican Party made it increasingly uncomfortable, and eventually impossible, for fiscal conservative/social libertarian people such as myself to associate ourselves with his narrow minded theocratic initiatives. Ultimately, this slide culminated in GWB, Iraq, the faith-based initiative, and the subjugation of science to theo-politics.

I won't revel in his death. He has been replaced by others anyway (Kennedy, Dobson, Bauer etc). But I will not mourn his death either. His influence was not positive, his legacy is not either.

Posted by: Phaedrus | May 15, 2007 5:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

To my own embarrassment I felt somewhat happy that Jerry Falwell died. He did an incredible amount of harm in the name of God. I wish God grants him the mercy that Falwell didn't have for those he hated and feared so much.

Posted by: Carlos | May 15, 2007 5:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Munchkins
Ding Dong! The Fundamentalist is dead. Which old Ist? The Funda - mentalist!
Ding Dong! The Fundamentalist is dead.
Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed.
Wake up, the Fundamentalist is dead. He's gone where the goblins go,
Below - below - below. Yo-ho, let's open up and sing and ring the bells out.
Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low.
Let them know
The Funda - mentalist is dead!

Barrister
But we've got to verify it legally, to see

Mayor
To see?

Barrister
If he

Mayor
If he?

Barrister
Is morally, ethic'lly

Father No.1
Spiritually, physically

Father No. 2
Positively, absolutely

Munchkins
Undeniably and reliably Dead

Coroner
As Coroner I examined him, and I must say, "amen."
he's not only merely dead, he's really most sincerely dead.

Mayor
Yes, let the joyous news be spread The Old Fundumentalist at last is dead!

Posted by: Maurie Beck | May 15, 2007 5:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"If you're not a born-again Christian, you're a failure as a human being." =Jerry Falwell.

From personal experience I've witnessed some really vile behavior; more hatred and lies and utter failure from those who claim to be born-again than anyother group of people.

I feel about his passing in much the same way I would feel about Pat Robertson, GW Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, or Karl Rove's death. Good riddance.

Posted by: Ginny | May 15, 2007 5:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It may be "unbecoming" of people to criticize a man after his death, but at the same time, its highly disconcerning when people lavish praise on a person who did so much to advance the cause of bigotry and prejudce. (Oops there I went)

Death is not a shield against criticism.

Posted by: Madrone | May 15, 2007 5:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Don't know Speechless. From what I read there is an common thread of people who are upset by a national figure who held very strong views against people based on their religion, sexual orientation, etc. Yes, the exchange is a little heated, but I find it encouraging that we are brought together sharing a passionate voice.

Perhaps this is an upside of Falwell's passing.

Posted by: Sal | May 15, 2007 5:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Compassion for the rest of mankind is what drives these commenters to point out who wrong and harmful Falwell was. He had political power, money and influence.

I didn't 'know his heart'. I only heard what he said and saw what he did, and it was those things that impacted the world. As people of any religion who care for others, that should be enough to condemn him to strong language here.

None of that means the commenters lack compassion or forgiveness. I'd have forgiven him - if he'd changes his views and actions.

Posted by: Steve B, UK | May 15, 2007 5:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Scully

Not sure you can be a person of true faith in God and be an outright bigot either.

Posted by: Burt | May 15, 2007 5:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

While some of the things Mr. Falwell said left me scratching my head and speechless, the words and thoughts I've read these past five minutes leave me equally speechless.

What kind of people have we become?

Now I am sad.

Posted by: Speechless | May 15, 2007 5:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I wish I could say that I am shocked by most of these comments, but alas I cannot. This entire blog is full of faithless people (no matter what many of you say, you cannot be both a person with a true faith in a Creator God and so full of bitterness - the two just don't go together) spewing nonsense after assumption after invective.

The utter lack of logic in these comments isn't suprising either, unfortunately. Many of you ascribe to Falwell your assumptions about what he stood for, or what vision he had for America and the world. Not one of you actually knew him - I didn't either. I cannot presume to know what was in his heart.

I, too, have often been dismayed by his comments, or at least the ones reported in the major media. I don't know why he said some of the things he did. I know I didn't agree with him theologically on many things, but we had others in common. However, I find it illogical for some actually to believe that Falwell wanted to control our every action, especially those in the bedroom, and that he wanted to force little children to pray to "his" God. I mean, please. Advocating against abortion is now intolerant? How 'bout advocating against the death tax, or for liberalization of concealed carry laws? Intolerant, too?

Differences in values don't mean others are the enemy, no matter how vehemently we may disagree. Admittedly, Falwell didn't evince much respectful disagreement either, but the old say is just as true, "two wrongs don't make a right."

This is truly juvenile stuff, people. But, of course, actual reasoned discourse isn't really any of your strong suite, now is it?

Posted by: the_scully | May 15, 2007 5:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Susan,

That was wonderful. I love your mind. And your ability to translate it into memorable words.

Thanks,

sw

Posted by: strangely warmed | May 15, 2007 5:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm hoping that Falwell's followers will join him in heaven ... quickly. The sooner the rapture comes, the sooner the world will be left to us sinners.

BTW - I've always favored the warmer climes, so I don't want him polluting the ambiance in the nether world. I don't think Mark Twain would enjoy his company either.

Posted by: Maurie Beck | May 15, 2007 5:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Ricko:

Yes, we'll all face it, but let's hope we won't be saying "oops!"

Paul

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2007 5:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I have followed the deceased's maunderings with raised eyebrown and an occasional chuckle for many years. Since I choose to follow the salutary custom of "not speaking ill of the dead", I am left with nothing to say.

Posted by: PAGANLADY | May 15, 2007 5:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Amy, equality for all people is HARDLY an American value. If it were, we wouldn't have needed the Civil War to end slavery, and then another 100 years to have equality enacted into law. If it were, then I could marry my partner.

But you've made my earlier point, which is this: Falwell, through his hate and vitriol, polluted Christianity to the point that plenty of good people--yourself included--now see it as something inherently dangerous, rather than something that can actually bring about good.

MLK and Falwell had more in common than just believing in God--they were both driven by their faith. The problem is, Falwell's faith was a pretty sick and twisted version of Christianity.

And no, Dahmer wouldn't go to heaven under fundamentalist theology. And no, I'm certainly no fundamentalist, either.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2007 5:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm sure that Jerry will be greeted by his Muslim counterpart, the late Mullah Dadullah of the Taliban. I just hope that, when those Pearly Gates open, Jesus greets him wearing red high-heeled pumps, a feather boa, and a stunning evening frock. :D

Posted by: Athena | May 15, 2007 5:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Terra Gazelle - I hope karma hits him right between the eyes. May he return as a black, homosexual, Pagan, Transgendered, lesbian.

I don't think that would be karma at all. As a black, homosexual, Pagan, Transgendered lesbian, Falwell would just be another well adjusted person in San Francisco.

Posted by: Maurie Beck | May 15, 2007 5:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

OK - the man was sick and deluded. He's gone now so we need to forgive him for the hate he spewed and the families he hurt and move on. We're not God to judge. I can only hope he is finally in peace and has found enlightenment regarding his ignorant teachings here on earth.

Posted by: Roy | May 15, 2007 5:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Good riddance to a pig of man in both mind and body.

Posted by: Ash | May 15, 2007 5:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Upon hearing of his death I felt compelled to add my two cents...But Susan has pretty much already said what I was thinking and I think she hit it right on the head. Jerry Falwell along with Pat Robertson are / were the poster children of everything thats wrong with Conservative religion. They pretend to follow christianity, but in truth are in it solely for their own miserable selves. They are despicable human beings. If there is a hell, then Jerry Falwell is warmin' up right about now....Good Ridance.

Posted by: Don Knutsen | May 15, 2007 4:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Amy, thank you for not being prejudice against people of faith. No one likes to be ridiculed and/or persecuted. I’m a devout Catholic and I promise not to be prejudice towards non-believers. We live in America and we should all be grateful for our freedoms. We should all be proud of our heritage and continue to make America great. Let’s try to put an end to all the hostilities. Have a great night.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 15, 2007 4:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There would be something to celebrate if the bigotry and ignorance for which Falwell stood had died with him. Indeed, it would be better still if he had survived his hateful ideology and, thus, shown us all what real redemption looks like. But, as things turned out, we can only do justice by wishing his ideology the worst even as we wish his family such peace as they may find.

Posted by: Michael | May 15, 2007 4:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a Christian and a voter, I don't agree with Falwell on any number of issues, but by calling him, in effect, stupid and intolerant, I daresay you reveal something of the same qualities in yourself.

Posted by: mtl | May 15, 2007 4:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I hope he enjoys meeting God and finding out how wrong and harmful he has been.

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2007 4:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It is too bad that there are so many negative comments about this man upon his death. But you know, you do have some control over how people will remember you, by the way you live your life. And Jerry Falwell did not live a very good life, I am afraid to say. He took money from poor old ladies, and used it to sew bitterness and unhappiness. Just look at this forum, to prove my point.

Posted by: Daniel | May 15, 2007 4:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment


Sue, Falwell was anything but reverend and his majority was any thing but moral.You are right to say, "This man's legacy is one of bigotry, xenophobia, anti-modernism, and utter stupidity. No doubt his funeral will be well-attended."
In addition, he was a hypocrite and a racist: on the one hand, he hated the Jews and on the other, he supported the racist apartheid Jewish state and the tormenting of the Palestinians.
HE will not be missed at all.

His ultimate and biggest evil and that of his immoral majority was to bring Bush to the white house and the consequent evil and destruction brought upon the Iraqi people.

Posted by: Asim | May 15, 2007 4:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Hopefully, Jerry picked a good time to die. For a while, he seemed triumphant. This was in part due to the tolerance of those who disagreed with him. He championed an exclusive faith while his opponents argued for a more inclusive approach. He could then claim, then you need to accept me and give me my due.

Things appear to be changing. Because he played a significant part in the Bush coalition, he is recognized now as political rather than faith leader. Since that political coalition has looted our country, he no longer receives the 'inclusive' pass. He was increasingly damned as is our president. And, justifiably so.

As this awareness appears to be escalating, it was a good time for him to exit.

Posted by: TWstroud | May 15, 2007 4:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"This man's legacy is one of bigotry, xenophobia, anti-modernism, and utter stupidity."

Complete agreement. You could also specify sexism, homophobia, inciting hatred, intolerance and working really hard to make America a Theocracy.

Not glad he's dead, but relieved that a voice capable of blaming "the lesbians" and "the ACLU" for 9/11 has been silenced.

Posted by: Steve B, UK | May 15, 2007 4:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Susan Jacoby, you don't respect anything...

Posted by: Anonymous | May 15, 2007 4:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Show of hands -- who think Falwell is kicking back in heaven talking to Jesus right now?

Posted by: B-Man | May 15, 2007 4:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Martin Luther King didn't try to make all people Christian - he stood for equality, which is an American value. Giving people their due right is a far cry from taking away the rights of large groups of people.

I repeat: I am not against people of faith. As long as they don't try to convert others, take away rights guaranteed under the constitution, or force the country to subscribe to Christianity, they can do whatever they want.

Jerry Falwell and Martin Luther King, Jr. had nothing in common other than believing in God. If you're going to start listing famous believers, don't forget Jeffrey Dahmer. According to fundamentalist theology, he went to Heaven, while Gandhi went to hell. Fair, huh?

Posted by: Amy | May 15, 2007 4:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"And, in the end the love you take is equal to the love you make"

Posted by: wiican | May 15, 2007 4:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's easy to say Falwell was misguided...and he was. But it was not what he said that was/is the problem; it's that so many people were happy to provide him with an audience, including Newt Gingrich and John McCain, and Monica Goodling.

Posted by: Dan | May 15, 2007 4:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yes, everyone does have a right to be wrong. But no one has a right to force me to live my life in a way that conforms to his beliefs, and that's exactly what Falwell tried to do.

BTW, I am a person of faith; more specifically, I am a follower of Christ. People like Falwell pervert the message and teachings of Christ. This man caused great harm in his lifetime and his message of intolerance, divisiveness and rigid fundamentalism harmed Christianity beyond measure.

Posted by: KJ | May 15, 2007 4:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

May God open your eyes to His beauty. May you delight in Him and live a life of joy in Him, everlasting, like He has with mine.

Posted by: knuckle scraper | May 15, 2007 4:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Everybody's got a right to be wrong. Falwell was just just wronger than everybody else.

Posted by: tom | May 15, 2007 4:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Everyone's got a right to be wrong. Falwell was just wronger than most everybody else.

Posted by: valerie printemps | May 15, 2007 4:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you, I'm glad to see that not every corner of the media is going to kowtow to the imagined masses of the "immoral minority". It was Falwell and his disciples who tried to politicize every inch of our lives and force their politics on us, so I see no reason to forbear from politicizing his death. His family and friends will reap the ridicule he has sown for them...

Posted by: Rich | May 15, 2007 4:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Amy--I just want to remind you that Martin Luther King, Jr, was a "person of faith" who we should be all glad didn't leave people alone.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2007 4:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

PS..
and a card carrying member of the DNC.

Posted by: Terra Gazelle | May 15, 2007 4:32 PM
Report Offensive Comment

For those of you who are troubled by the vitriol being sent Falwell's way on this blog:

Isn't there some Bible verse about reaping what you sow?

Posted by: Mr Mark | May 15, 2007 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Posted by: David Ehrenstein | May 15, 2007 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I joined the immoral minority in 1980 after Falwell decided become part of the mainstream of American politics.....does anyone remember the immoral minority our motto is "divided we rot, united we ferment"....Well now that he is gone and thats a damn good thing......He started what king george is still trying to do...convince america that the right and religious cause is the american way.....well let us be relieved that there is one less idiot out there..........

Posted by: john hicks | May 15, 2007 4:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Falwell was an evil, divisive man.

From the standpoint of Christianity, he was, first and foremost, a blasphemer. He claimed to speak for God. This is the fundamental blasphemy, before all others: he claimed to speak for God.

Posted by: POed Lib | May 15, 2007 4:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Posted by: David Ehrenstein | May 15, 2007 4:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I am not biased against "people of faith." Jerry Falwell in no way represents the best of believers. Instead, he tried to force his beliefs on a nation that supposedly leaves beliefs to the individual conscience.

He wanted to overturn Roe v. Wade, force students to pray to his god in school, and pack the Supreme Court with religious fundamentalists. As an American I am appalled at what he wanted to do and horrified at how much success he had.

I have nothing against "people of faith" as long as they leave me alone. Falwell wasn't one of them. I repeat: good riddance.

Posted by: Amy | May 15, 2007 4:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Observer:
Falwell made a career out of whipping up hatred against people like me and some of my dearest friends and family members. Why exactly should I mourn his passing?

Posted by: lepidopteryx | May 15, 2007 4:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The population of Hell increased by one today.

Posted by: Richard Anderson | May 15, 2007 4:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

falwell was a hate filled spirit. He was an ignorant bigot and I did smile when I heard he had gone to his maker.

I hope karma hits him right between the eyes. May he return as a black, homosexual, Pagan, Transgendered, lesbian.

Now that really makes me smile!

Posted by: Terra Gazelle | May 15, 2007 4:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"This man's legacy is one of bigotry, xenophobia, anti-modernism, and utter stupidity. No doubt his funeral will be well-attended."

Indeed, the entire Republican party will attend, led by St John McCain, himself.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 15, 2007 4:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Now that was real "Pure unadulterated poppycock".

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2007 4:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm probably too young to remember him in his heyday. But the guy built homes for unwed mothers and alcoholics. He can't be all that bad.

Posted by: dcp | May 15, 2007 4:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

OBSERVER:

No, these comments speak out against hatred, bigotry and other evil ideas.

Falwell spoke out against people. The words he said and the ideas he espoused hurt people.

There is a vast difference.

Posted by: KJ | May 15, 2007 4:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well, he blamed me for 9/11 and he condemned me to hell without even knowing me. How come I'm the one who's mean-spirited and hateful?

Posted by: Xtopher | May 15, 2007 4:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

These posts and Jacoby's invective reflect a sad state of affairs for the left. Is is rational, or reflective, or enlightened to launch a mean-spirited attack on a dead man? You may not have agreed with his public policy or religious beliefs, but how sad that your disagreement must be communicated in such a manner. I suspect that it reflects a bias against people of faith, a form of the very bigotry you ascribe to Jerry Falwell.

Posted by: David | May 15, 2007 4:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The hateful comments to this link are very telling and descriptive of the people and issues Falwell spoke out against.

Posted by: Observer | May 15, 2007 4:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Lars:

Pure unadulterated poppycock. Pointing out the biases, prejudices and bigotry of a person who (quite proudly) displayed it so publicly is in no way a bigoted activity.

Falwell advocated the abridgment of human and civil rights of those with whom he disagreed. His theocratic goal was to create a fundamentalist government that would control the most private of decisions and that would destroy individual liberty.

Falwell was an evil man of evil thoughts. Yes, he was a bigot. Yes, I believe he has now looked into the face of God and been told "depart from me, I never knew you."

Posted by: KJ | May 15, 2007 4:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Jerry Falwell is likely to be fondly remembered by those whose knuckles are just a bit scraped from their daily walks.

It is now being said that Falwell was a better person than he appeared in private life. If true, that just means he said bad things about groups and people for reasons other than true belief.

Someone on a television show just attested to Mr. Falwell's "integrity" because the preacher would say outrageous things and then retract them. Webster appears to define integrity in a different way.

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2007 4:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's interesting that most of the people here condemning Falwell's death are non-Christian. Jesus preached messages of love, compassion, tolerance and acceptance, and Falwell and his ilk turned them into words that divide, hurt, and anger. He turned the word into evangelical into something dirty, and probably did more harm to the Christian faith than any other person in the last 100 years, by making it seem that being Christian was something mutually exclusive of also being gay, a feminist or ecumenical.

As a devout Christian myself, I won't celebrate his death because that would uncharitable, but I don't mourn his passing, either.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2007 4:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment

No, not a candle. A cadelabra!

Posted by: Anonymous | May 15, 2007 4:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

If Falwell had had a uterus, I would have let him decide what to do with it, and I wouldn't have started a movement to merge Church and State to take it away if he did something I didn't like.

It's not bigotry to hate someone who is hateful because of what they do and what they represent. Get a dictionary, lars.

Posted by: Amy | May 15, 2007 4:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Talk about a group of angry, hateful, mean-spirited group of people, your readers are at the head of the class.

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2007 4:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

My one great regret about Rev. Falwell's passing is that we never caught him coming out of a bawdy house (or a bath house). Oh well.

Posted by: wiccan | May 15, 2007 4:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

For someone being accused of so much bigotry and hate, Rev. Falwell doesn't hold a candle to the bigotry and hate of the people commenting on his death.

Posted by: Lars | May 15, 2007 4:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Compare Fallwell's Moral Majority to Goldwater's conservative movement and Presidential campaign in the early 1960s.

Which one do you think more deserves the label, "loyal opposition"?

I'd go with Goldwater. I mean, I wouldn't have voted for him, but I'd rather have him as an opponent making his points than Falwell.

Martina, SSC-Athens, GA

Posted by: Martina | May 15, 2007 4:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I completely agree with your assessment of Falwell. However, I think this makes it that much MORE appropriate to demonize him the same way we do Ted Kennedy. Neither were trying to ruin the country, but surely would have if left unopposed.

Posted by: Vern | May 15, 2007 4:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Falwell's entire life's work was based on the belief that he had a right to tell me what to do with my uterus because of his goofy interpretation of an ancient fairy tale.

Good riddance!

Posted by: Amy | May 15, 2007 4:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Paul,
Rev. Fallwell isn't the only one who will be surprised at death. We'll all face it. Kind of a scary thought isn't it.

Posted by: ricko | May 15, 2007 4:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Falwell preached ignorance and he died ignorant. There's no god and no afterlife. Falwell not only didn't meet his god, he didn't even get to find out that there was no god to meet.

He leaves his legacy of bigotry from which there is no redemption.

We don't all get to write our own tombstone, but Falwell did, and it's eternal.

Posted by: Mr Mark | May 15, 2007 4:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Jerry Falwell, may you rest in peace, you ignorant ba$tard.

Posted by: mizbinkley | May 15, 2007 4:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a pro-choice woman, a feminist, a pagan, and a friend and family member of many BGLT people, I'm finding it difficult to muster any tears over Falwell's passing. OK, so I'm not really trying all that hard. He was such a hateful man.

Posted by: lepidopteryx | May 15, 2007 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There's a theory that one finds all truth upon death. If that's true, the Reverend is in for a big surprise.

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2007 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

There's a theory that one finds all truth upon death. If that's true, the Reverend is in for a big surprise.

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2007 3:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment

As a feminist, a pagan, and friend and relative to many BGLT people, I'm having a difficult time working up any tears over Falwell's passing.
Well, actually, I'm not trying all that hard. He was such a hateful man.

Posted by: lepidopteryx | May 15, 2007 3:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you! I am constantly amazed at the following and press someone receive who spouts the most heinous kinds of hate speech and how that same person can then be sanctified by death.

Posted by: Cyndy | May 15, 2007 3:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Amen, Susan!

Posted by: Norrie Hoyt | May 15, 2007 3:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well and truly spoken, Susan!

Posted by: Mr Mark | May 15, 2007 3:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company