My Brother's Keeper? What About Us?
In the politicizing that is going on about the economy, I keep asking myself, "What about us?" Those of us who make up the population of the United States, who elect presidents and congressional representatives, who are bleeding and nobody seems to notice or care.
Instead of genuine concern for "us," what I see are politicians and pundits already trying to set the stage for the 2012 presidential election.
When I heard Rush Limbaugh say that he hopes President Obama's plan fails, I asked, "but what about "us?" And while President Obama is facing a behemoth task of fixing a critically ill economy, the bottom line is that, when it is all said and done, he is still a politician who has to protect his interests.
The squabble between Republicans and Democrats is less government vs. more government. Less government didn't work, so more government is being tried. Less government doesn't really seem to care about "us" and Republicans think that more government, or big government, cares about "us" too much.
Is government supposed to be worried about "us?" Is government our brothers' keeper? I think it is. Surely, the government knows that without "us," this country as it is cannot continue to exist. But "we the people" are getting more and more diminished as the government bails out the corporations and banks. "We the people" are kind of being left to make it on our own.
Now, to be fair, I appreciate the President's efforts. He at least seems to have "us" in mind. His stimulus plan and his budget seems to have "us" being taken care of a bit better. Word has it that any time a government wants to rejuvenate itself, it should engage in social programs, programs that at least appear to help "us."
Some of what I have heard that is in the budget and in the stimulus plan will help some of "us." Supposedly, more of "us" will get jobs, and that is necessary. I guess that's at the heart of the stimulus plan.
But too many of "us" are down and out. Too many of "us" have lost our homes and our jobs, and to be honest, a bail out for "us" would feel mighty good right about now. A stimulus check for "us" in the amount of a couple of thousand dollars is a really nice gesture, but too many of "us" are too down under for that amount of money to do much good.
Then, I wonder how much concern there is for "us" when I hear that some state governments have earmarked their stimulus monies, or at least some of them, for demolition of downtown structures that will be replaced by parks. Huh? I do not for the life of me understand how that helps "us."
I know that this economic mess is bigger than my ability to understand it. I do not understand macroeconomics or microeconomics. I have a hard time understanding the stock market.
But what I do understand is that the people, "us," are in dire straits, and the government's policies are a lot of the reason why "we the people" are where we are. I don't know if it's better to have "big government" or "less government." What I do know is that the people who are elected by "us" ought to take a breath so they can hear our breathing, or lack thereof.
Is the government supposed to care? Is it supposed to treat the pain of the people it serves? I think so.
There is a crisis in this land, and it's not all about Wall Street.
Main Street is on life support.
By
Susan K. Smith
|
March 3, 2009; 12:00 AM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Holding Our Brothers, Fathers, Sons Accountable |
Next: "Forgive Us Our Debts..."
Posted by: spellady08 | March 7, 2009 10:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment
We are all called to do something! One being love thy neighbor as thy self. It is clear that some of our politicians have long forgotten this. Collectively as a nation, we got into this mess and only collectively will we overcome. Further, we didn’t arrive here overnight nor will our recovery be as prompt. Any person(s) who stands in the way of the attempts to help all of “us” will have their day. Perhaps it will come in 2012 when they or their buddy decides to run for office and “we the people” lovingly vote NO.
Posted by: fedennis | March 7, 2009 2:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment
When will the "us" realize that we are really an us and therefore our "brother's (and sister's) keeper?" When will the "us" shut down the Rush Limbaugh types by turning them off? I am so sick of political and so-called religious posturing.
Posted by: djw531 | March 7, 2009 11:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment
When Cain responded, "Am I my brother's keeper?" (Gen 4:9), he had already murdered his brother Abel. I guess I think by the time we ask that question it may already be too late. Maybe the question is this, “Who is your neighbor? “ In that parable there is the teaching that we still have time to choose act wisely and walk humbly, on behalf of others. Everyone has responsibility, the government (big or small) churches, mosques, synagogues, community organizations, social service agencies, families and individuals. No need to bicker over the details, there is enough work to be done by all, for our “neighbors”!
Posted by: tyson41 | March 7, 2009 5:43 AM
Report Offensive Comment
We must be the keepers of one another, if we are ever to attain the lofty goal of forming a more perfect union.
Posted by: rahmundo_imani | March 7, 2009 12:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Your vulnerability, saying there are things you don't understand, is so refreshing to read. I really think it's the republicans who are more concerned with the big vs. small government hullabaloo. They're so sure of their principles, but haven't got any ideas. Democrats aren't always right, but at least we know what solutions their principles offer us. We'd be eating principles for breakfast, lunch, and dinner if republicans were in office, and nothing else. They have no ideas; they're lost. I'd rather have robust dialogue in our democracy, but I'm experiencing some schadenfreude at seeing the republicans squirm in confusion.
Did you hear about RNC chair Michael Steel saying republicans needed to include everyone including "one armed midgets" or when he said that hip hop people, like DJ Chuck D, are inspirations because they come from the projects and get involved with politics? Chuck D had to call him out on that and say he wasn't from the projects I'm all for including one-armed people, but this man misrepresents our community and so many others. I don't think one-armed midgets want him talking for them. Steel is a shill for the republicans; Ishmael Reed calls it a "talking android." Now he isn't saying the things they like and are asking him to leave.
Posted by: scott1164 | March 6, 2009 11:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment
A country founded on greed, slavery, racism and the profit margin (profit motive) has always put people last on its agenda. It is nothing new that the Government does not care about us, care about Main Street (as opposed to Wall Street) or care about those who are homeless and live under bridges, cardboard "tents" and lean-to's on Whatever Strret where they can find shelter without the "law" carrying them away and/or chasing them out of sight.
The more things change, Pastor Smith, the more they stay the same. President Obama cannot change the evil Government he inherited all by himself. The Republican vote 100% against his stimulus package should have been a "wake up" call for him to see that and understand that very quickly into his first four year term.
Those who have profited off the misery of others do not want "the system" changed. They just want it "fixed" so they can make more profits! What Dr. King said in 1967 is just as true today as it was then. We have a three headed monster we are facing and fighting -- racism, militarism and CAPITALISM!
Posted by: Jamila1 | March 6, 2009 10:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Whether it's our government or our neighbor, we are all our brother's keeper. What affects one could affect the other, whether directly or indirectly. If my so-called "irresponsible" neighbor gets behind on their mortgage and their home goes into foreclosure, the value of my home will significantly decrease. Is the bailout plan for homeowners fair? How much will this bailout help us? God only knows. However, we have to try something. My prayers are with President Obama as he along with other government officials attempts to jumpstart this economy. My disdain is with those in the Republican Party, who instead of coming up with NEW ideas are simply trying to derail the President's plan. I believe history is going to judge the Republican Party harshly for their juvenile behavior during these tough times. The Republicans are trying to throw a wrench in the plan in hopes that it will give them leverage in 2012. For a party that tries to portray themselves as the moral compass of America, they refuse to extend a hand of grace to the American people. I agree, that there are some who were irresponsible in the ideas of what they could afford. But what's done is done. We have to move forward with bode ideas with the means to get the economy moving again.
Posted by: Esau | March 5, 2009 10:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter










I believe wholeheartedly that the government should have more of a concern for its people. After all as the article states, there would be no government and no democracy if there was no "us" to support it. The government needs to be less about who has the power, and more about how they can use their power to help their citizens. It is amazing that so much wealth exists in the United States and that so few of our citizens have access to it. I understand that the bail out does have to target some of the high end corporations that are responsible for the distribution of goods and services, but after all is said and done and the banks and car companies have their money, is the single mother facing foreclosure going to be any better off? Or what about the college student that cannot return to school because of their finances? I absolutely applaud Obama's principles of being "for the people" but also realize that he is still a politician in our American, 21st century, capitalist society, and that in order to live in a society where there is true equality in the exchange of resources there must be a transformation not only of societal processes, but thoughts and ideals. However, in light of the current situation that we live in, the more people that we can vote in leadership that are actually "for the people" not just "for the rich", the more change we will see.