Wrestling with faith in Iowa
By Elizabeth Tenety
Cedar Falls' Cassy Herkelman gets her arm raised after winning by default in a Class 3A 112 pound match at the Iowa State Wrestling tournament, Thursday Feb. 17, 2011 in Des Moines, Iowa. Herkelman was one of the first girls to ever qualify for the state tournament and won by default after her opponent Joel Northrup of Linn-Mar High, refused to wrestle a girl. (AP Photo/Steve Pope)
An Iowa high school wrestler with a 35-4 record gave up his chance at a state championship Thursday because he believes his faith forbade him from wrestling his opponent: a girl.
Homeschooled sophomore Joel Northrup, who competes for Linn-Mar High School, forfeited in the first-round of Iowa's state championship --giving female competitor Cassy Herkelman the victory.
In a statement released by the teen:
"I have a tremendous amount of respect for Cassy and Megan and their accomplishments. However wrestling is a combat sport and it can get violent at times. As a matter of conscience and my faith, I do not believe it is appropriate for a boy to engage a girl in this manner. It is unfortunate that I have been placed in a situation not seen in most high school sports in Iowa."
Cedar Falls' Cassy Herkelman, center, and her opponent Joel Northrup, center left, of Linn-Mar High, stand at the scorers table waiting for their leg bands prior to their Class 3A 112 pound first-round match at the Iowa State Wrestling tournament, Thursday, Feb. 17, 2011 in Des Moines, Iowa. Northrup, who was one of the favorites to win his weight class defaulted on his first-round state tournament match rather than face Herkelman, one of the first girls to ever qualify for the event. (AP Photo/Steve Pope)
Iowa's WHOtv.com reported Friday that Northrup was then "bumped down to the consolation bracket after his default to Herkelman. He lost to Tyler Willers of Pleasant Valley Friday morning."
According to a story in the Des Moines Register, "Joel's father is a youth pastor at Believers In Faith Church, a non-denominational church in Marion, as well as a volunteer chaplain with the United States Army."
Joel's father told Christian Broadcasting Network that his son "'believes, based on his conscience and faith, that girls should be treated with dignity and respect--taking nothing away from those two female athletes [another girl competed in the tourney but Northrup did not face her]-- but wrestling is a combat sport."
"There's certainly no scriptures that address this and nothing doctrinal or church based. I just believe this is a principled decision."
There may not be a biblical injunction against men wrestling women in the Iowa state championships, but you don't have to be a believer to imagine that the physical contact necessary during a coed match may make athletes (and their parents) uncomfortable.
Should Northrup have been put in that position?
Elizabeth Tenety
| February 18, 2011; 11:44 AM ET Save & Share:Previous: Details still sketchy about planned Capitol Hill hearing on U.S. Muslim radicals | Next: Somali pirates kill missionaries
Posted by: WmarkW | February 18, 2011 1:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment
"There's certainly no scriptures that address this and nothing doctrinal or church based. I just believe this is a principled decision."
Freedom and exercise of religion not based on cherry-picked Abrahamic scriptures - how refreshing.
Posted by: areyousaying | February 18, 2011 2:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Should he have been put in this position?
Well, is there an alternative? Either he plays by the rules and the seeding, or he imposes his admitted unjustifiable religious preferences on every other contestant in the tournament.
It is analogous to Muslim girls sports that seek to compete in public leagues, but want their opponents to submit to very restrictive sectarian limitations like not permitting males older than nine to be present for the contest.
The contestants in the tournament agree to play by the rules in effect at the time. Observant Jews refuse to play in various leagues that play on Saturday lest they violate Sabbath. That is their choice, but it imposes no obligation on the leagues involved.
Posted by: ceflynline | February 18, 2011 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The kid made a decision based on modern day cultural values. This had nothing to do with a book that allows slavery and rape.
Posted by: evolvedthinker | February 18, 2011 3:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment
So does this mean any boys should be able to compete in any sport against girls if there isn't a boys league?
Posted by: AlibiFarmer | February 18, 2011 4:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment
This is in high school. Maybe he is trying to respect the girls and not touch them in certain places. I mean can you just imagine the running commentary that a late night show or Talk Soup would put to a male female high school wrestling match?? It would be impossible to resist.
I've seen wrestling. It's a very close, intimate, contact sport.
Posted by: hebe1 | February 18, 2011 4:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment
They need to get some WWE divas to teach this kid a lesson. Have Kelley Kelly choke slam the pencil-necked geek.
Posted by: Garak | February 18, 2011 4:52 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I have to believe he knew going in that there were girls in the tournament. He was one of the top competitors and it seems she was too. Generally at that level, athletes are aware of who they may face. I think he had an obligation to face whatever competition was put in front of him. Now her tournament experience is tarnished too, and she didn't break any rules.
Posted by: allknowingguy | February 18, 2011 5:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I have a lot of respect for the young woman, who wants to compete and has put her efforts out there to do it. I am sure she has faced a lot of guff over her choice of wrestling as a sport.
I also have a lot of respect for the young man who refused to wrestle a woman out of his idea of decency and respect.
He is not being asked to do anything evil or bad. He is simply, forgive me, squemish. He holds a point of view that, if extended, would limit women to whatever he decides is suitable.
Joel really needs to get over it.
Posted by: amelia45 | February 18, 2011 5:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I have had my chimes rung in mediaeval re-creation combat by female fighters (the 40-60 odd pounds of armor and the length of a rattan broadsword keep things from getting as intimate as wrestling). I have been kicked and punched by female karateka in sparring, thrown by female judoka, and been launched into low-earth orbit by a silver haired grandmother in aikido class (many of these women had black belts, which I don't).
Mind you, I am not in a conservative Christian sect and was not a high school student (when gender differences are so highly sensitive), so did not have the personal ethical issues to confront that Mr. Northrup did. Generally, the first time a female opponent plants you on the mat or the tourney field, considerations of whether it is appropriate to work at full pitch in a combat sport with this particular opponent become secondary.
Posted by: paulhume | February 18, 2011 8:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Believers Faith Church,like
the Pentecostals, also don't
believe in premarital sex.
They claim it leads to dancing !!!
Posted by: flyersout | February 19, 2011 7:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I salute Mr. Northrup for taking a principled stand that he knew would hurt him. As to why he entered the tournament even though girls were entered: He probably hoped the female contestant(s) would be in other brackets and would lose before he would have to face them. Didn't work out that way.
Posted by: SilverSpringer1 | February 19, 2011 10:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Should he have been put in what position?
He refused to wrestle his opponent. He was not told he could not eat Fish on Friday.
End of story. Good luck, kid.
Posted by: Farnaz2Mansouri21 | February 20, 2011 6:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment
C'mon folks, be real here. He's a teenage boy who would have to have his hands and body all over this girl.
Did you read that? Teenage Boy. Wearing tight clothes, a whole audience of people staring at him.
Do I have to get biological here ...
Posted by: eezmamata | February 20, 2011 6:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Erections happen regardless of whether one's opponent is a girl or a boy. They happen in contact sports and they just happen.
It's an anatomy thing.
Girls have other issues.
Not the point.
NO story here.
Move on.
Posted by: Farnaz2Mansouri21 | February 20, 2011 7:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The girl lost 5-1 in the next round to another boy so maybe the pervs who allow physical contact and groping between girl and boy wrestlers got some kicks out of the competition. Other than that Its hard to fathom what the organizers wanted to prove.
Posted by: yasseryousufi | February 21, 2011 2:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment
There wisdom in: never use physical force on a female. Some would say in sport is different, but many gentlemen make no exceptions, not even arm wrestling, knowing how way leads on to way. It is a matter of principle, nothing to do with faith, nothing to do fear of being sexually aroused.
Posted by: ThishowIseeit | February 21, 2011 9:11 AM
Report Offensive Comment
If you compete in a sport, you compete against the opponents that are available for competition, or you don't compete. He chose to forfeit and that was his call to make. But he shouldn't complain if he gets cut from the team or doesn't make next year's team because his actions hurt the school's win/loss record.
Posted by: lepidopteryx | February 22, 2011 8:24 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Twitter










Would any female competitor in any sport be required to forfeit for refusing to compete in a close-contact match against a male?