« Previous Post | Next Post »

Guest Voice

Beijing's Ballot

HONG KONG - Despite a recent arms deal with Taiwan and nuclear agreement with India, China is still in a comfortable spot with Bush. They saw those moves coming. They appreciate that his international focus is and has consistently been on the Middle East, save the Six-party talks. (But even that initiative--the administration's greatest in the region--actually provides Beijing with leverage over Washington.) After eight years in office, his goals are well-understood and his actions generally predictable. He's a known quantity.

But Bush turns into a pumpkin in a week. So is Beijing rooting for McCain or Obama?

According to Dr. Richard Hu, professor of International and Public Affairs at Hong Kong University, China's policymakers traditionally prefer Republican presidents. One reason for this is the conventional wisdom that Republicans are less focused on human rights than Democrats, and are thus less likely to link this extraordinarily sensitive issue to other areas of bilateral relations. Bush's attendance of the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony in defiance of calls to boycott is a good contemporary example.

But China's elite haven't forgotten that it was Clinton who decoupled human rights conditions from the renewal of the US' Most Favored Nation status with China in 1994. Both McCain and Obama condemned China's crackdown on Tibetan monks in March. Obama called on Bush to consider skipping the Olympics, and McCain insinuated that, if he were president, he wouldn't have attended. Thus, regardless of whether there's a real difference in party ethos on human rights, in this instance the two candidates' views are comparable.

More significant to this election, says Dr. Hu, is the Republican's traditional embrace of free trade. China's elite are growing increasingly weary of what they view as protectionist sentiments from the Obama campaign. China's leadership is certainly not scared to go "to the mat" with an Obama Administration on currency manipulation, but at the same time, they'd rather not. They're also concerned that the global financial crisis may fan protectionist flames in Washington, and that a Democratic president may be more receptive to protective measures from a Democratic Congress. So on economics, Beijing is clearly in favor of McCain.

Under normal circumstances, that would be enough. But as Hu notes, recent--and frequent--references from McCain "about a 'League of Democracies'...bothers people in Beijing." They're content with the state of U.S.-China relations, and they would view a new "Democracies only" club as a serious detractor. This one issue is enough to tip the balances back into neutral territory.

With six in one and a half dozen in the other, China's leaders are not crossing their fingers for a certain outcome next Tuesday. Regardless of the unsettling themes in each campaign, Beijing "has a rather relaxed attitude toward this...election" says Dr. Y. Ren, professor of International and Public Affairs at Hong Kong University. "Past experience reveals that no matter how critical the presidential candidates are, they'll moderate their tones once they move into the White House." Hu agrees; rhetoric aside, "the structure...of the [U.S.-China] relationship will not...be turned upside down" by McCain or Obama.


Rob Sheldon is a graduate student in Security Policy Studies at George Washington University. He is currently studying politics and international affairs at Hong Kong University.

Email This Post | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Please e-mail PostGlobal if you'd like to receive an email notification when PostGlobal sends out a new question.

Comments (3)

Pebble1776 Author Profile Page:

It is time to end the rouge version of special interest free trade and replace it with real free trade. The way free-trade is supposed to work is if you have a current account imbalance, your currency should depreciate making imports more expensive and less desirable which shrinks the trade deficit. A self balancing process. With the corrupt, special interest version that we now have, mercantilist Asian countries rig their currencies and multinationals provide domestic political cover in order to protect their labor arbitrage schemes. Wall Street and the worlds banks make their money off the excess money flows created by the imbalance.

The unholy trinity of special interests (multinationals, Wall Street and Asian governments) have rigged a game under the disguise of free trade. If currencies rebalanced every few years, it would wipe out the profit margin of companies that have gone all-in, moving their production overseas. If free trade worked the way it is supposed to work, companies would balance their production domestically and overseas. It is time to end this corrupt perversion of free trade and replace it with real free trade.

Citizenofthepost-Americanworld Author Profile Page:

Interesting to hear what some have to say from Hong Kong... however, I would much prefer to hear what they think in Beijing... and from the dragon's mouth, so to speak.

On CCTV-9, with smiles, a unique sense of humour and much telling laughter, Chinese journalists, men and women, have been conducting most illuminating interviews, recently, on the current US generated financial crisis in the West. A good part of that material is available on the Web.

With all due respect, there seems to be much more to learn from Beijing, these days, than from Hong Kong.

Hypocrite1 Author Profile Page:

When babbling too much, you lose your aim and focus. Need to learn, study more and complete your Ph.D first.

PostGlobal is an interactive conversation on global issues moderated by Newsweek International Editor Fareed Zakaria and David Ignatius of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is On Faith, a conversation on religion. Please send us your comments, questions and suggestions.