SAIS Next Europe

« Previous Post | Next Post »

EU Takes Realist Tone With Colombia

By Jill O’Donnell

During Colombian President Alvaro Uribe's recent visit to Berlin, two agenda items garnered attention: closer economic ties with Europe and help fighting the drug trade.

Europe is charging ahead on the former. Negotiations over a free trade agreement (FTA) began in mid-February, leaving the EU poised to gain where the United States lost last year. After two years of negotiations and substantial expenditures of political capital by both the Bush administration and President Uribe, Congress refused to vote on the U.S.-Colombia (FTA) over concerns about human rights and labor standards--even after the FTA was revised to include enforceable labor provisions. (The bill ultimately fell victim to an underlying difference in perspective: The Bush administration saw the FTA as a tool for strengthening national security through economic development that could undercut drug activity in Colombia, but the Democrats in control of Congress saw it as a reward that Colombia did not deserve).

Violence against trade union members in Colombia was a highly publicized sticking point in Congress. The issue surfaced in Europe in December, when the European Commission announced that after studying Colombia's human rights record, it would consider revoking existing trade preferences. But less than a week later, the Commission decided to extend the preferences for two years.

While some in the EU have voiced concern about Colombia's human rights failures, Europe's top politicians do not seem interested in linking this problem to the FTA. For Fernando Cardesa Garcia, the European Commission's Ambassador to Colombia, it's all business. Earlier this month, he told the Colombian news magazine, Semana, "Basically, we don't believe the human rights issue is a problem for the negotiations, because it is not an element in the commercial agreement." Chancellor Merkel praised Colombia for an improved human rights record in her meeting with President Uribe, and he noted that German support of Colombia's efforts to strengthen its justice agencies would be welcome.

Keeping the FTA negotiations on a separate track from European support for Colombia's civil institutions could be good for free trade and for progress in tackling the problems plaguing Colombia. This approach would keep the trade agreement from becoming mired in a set of problems that require sustained attention in their own right. President Uribe was emphatic about one such problem during his Berlin visit. In an interview with the German newspaper Die Welt, he called on Europe for more help with fighting drugs, and said, "Every hectare on which coca is no longer planted in a Colombian jungle lowers the cocaine supply in Europe. It is to Europe's benefit to help us!"
He has a point. The United Nations estimates that Colombia produces 61 percent of the global cocaine supply, and cocaine use is rising in Europe. The 2008 report of the European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction noted that over the 2001-2006 period, cocaine-related offenses rose in all European countries except Bulgaria, Germany and Slovakia.

This is clearly an entrenched, multi-faceted problem that billions of dollars spent through U.S. anti-drug programs have not been able to solve. But recognition of how demand in Europe fuels the problem is important. Europe should attack this challenge with the same intensity it has shown in pursuing the FTA.

Jill O'Donnell is a graduate student in the IR/International Policy program at the Johns Hopkins University Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) in Washington, DC.

Email the Author | Email This Post | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Johns Hopkins University.

Comments (4)

JillODonnell Author Profile Page:

PeteGuither raises a good point that eradicating the coca plant in one area can result in coca cultivation in other areas. However, the quote by Uribe that I cited in the post must be read in the public, political context of a rhetorical call for help, and Uribe's mention of the demand side of the problem is relevant. Also, Johns Hopkins SAIS does require all of its students to take several international economics courses, therefore all students are familiar with supply and demand, and it is the demand side of the drug problem (as documented by rising cocaine use in Europe) that I chose to highlight in this post.

Chaotician Author Profile Page:

Clearly, the so-called War on Drugs has been a failure, is a failure, and has no potential to be anything but a failure in the future! Nation after nation has suffered for America's insatiable appetite for Drugs, legal or not! Our Courts are chocked and no doubt heavily bought and influenced by the obscene profits selling “poor” Americans their Drugs! Our police forces are armed like militias with expensive Swat teams to combat force protection by Drug Lords! Our Prisons and jails are stuffed with people who’s only crime was an appetite for Drugs that hurt no one but themselves! The hypocrisy of our Drug laws as opposed to our actual behaviors is obscene! One wonders how many of our politicians must benefit from keeping this activity illegal??

rodven Author Profile Page:

I think President Uribe is right, supply must be attacked but we all know demand must be attacked as well.

We need wiser methods to fight this war against drugs, not only bullets and open war will stop the drug flow.

What about legalization? Is this a real option? Are we ready to cope with the problem in a pragmatic way?

The drug lords are the ones who wouldn't like to see the restrictions disappear...the illegality of their business is which makes it profitable. Why don't we change strategy?


PeteGuither Author Profile Page:

President Uribe is clearly making things up, and, unfortunately, Jill O'Donnell has been taken in fully. Uribe says "Every hectare on which coca is no longer planted in a Colombian jungle lowers the cocaine supply in Europe." History shows this is false. Eradicate one hectare in Colombia, and another pops up in Bolivia, or another hectare of Rainforest is razed to create more coca crops, or, as has already happened, growers learn to get more productivity out of the other hectares.

Johns Hopkins should add a course in economics. Supply is a function of demand, not of interdiction or eradication.

From 1986 to 2007, the DEA seized 1,383,373 kilograms of cocaine (source: DEA) and yet during that same period, there were no shortages and the street price declined.

When you say that Europe should "attack this challenge," hopefully you mean an attack that is smarter than attacking the laws of economics.


PostGlobal is an interactive conversation on global issues moderated by Newsweek International Editor Fareed Zakaria and David Ignatius of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is On Faith, a conversation on religion. Please send us your comments, questions and suggestions.